Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ordais
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:09:00 -
[271]
Edited by: Ordais on 27/08/2008 10:11:42
Originally by: Gaia Thorn Edited by: Gaia Thorn on 27/08/2008 10:07:43
Originally by: Cyberman Mastermind Edited by: Cyberman Mastermind on 27/08/2008 09:41:09 Edited by: Cyberman Mastermind on 27/08/2008 09:40:20
Originally by: Krxon Blade Exceptions should be allowed.
Exceptions shouldn't be necessary.
IF there is a good reason to remove those silent giants from high-sec, then I'm sure we'd accept the loss of the Veldnaught (and the others). Till now, though, no one could think up a good reason. And CCP remains silent...
[edit ] "Good reason" does not include "Duh, it's obivous" or "Capital ships do not belong to high-sec". Neither is "CCP says so - now".
Hows this for a reason they made a rule about them not being in high sec ?
END of discussion if u dont like it adapt or leave welcome to new eve online.
look, you are just another of this "if i cant have it noone else should have it" type of ppl he? go away, plz.
This high-sec caps added something to the game, its obvious. They take it away (and not because it was broken). That shows how CCP are NOT in touch with the game anymore. Thats why there are complaints. The feeling of "just a matter of time till they nerf me too for no apparent reason" is all over us, and you can feel it on the forums already.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:09:00 -
[272]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:10:06
Originally by: Kuolematon Aww comoon people. Stop this maddness. Their game, their rules.
They want to remove caps from hisec for reason X .. so be it.
Stop this NERD RAGE now!
so you support them not telling us before hand?
edit: nerf the opux yatch, it's not fair for only one person to own it.
|
Jimbob Jumbo
Macabre Votum Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:10:00 -
[273]
bring back the veldnaught !
|
Eben Rochelle
Gallente LFC Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:10:00 -
[274]
Posting because it need to be said. C'mon CCP show your face(s) and explain this pointless change.
|
Gaia Thorn
Villains
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:11:00 -
[275]
I mean think of the carebears that cant mind veldspar cause chribba and his co-horts have stripped the systems in there unbeatbable machines.
Its a unfair advantage and should be corrected so that everyone conforms to the same standard of gameplay.
No one should stick out nor have any advantages over any one else
Removed. Please keep your EVE signature related to your EVE persona and not that of a real life politician. Navigator
I am a political prisoner of eve. |
Another Forum'Alt
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:12:00 -
[276]
This is a stupid move on CCP's part, and proof they are trying to alienate their own players.
/signed to move it back. Save EVE's most famous landmark: Linkage |
Zeknichov
Dark Prophecy Inc. Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:12:00 -
[277]
Seriously the second devs introduced faction warfare everyone should have been suspicious. Then nano-nerf than hi-sec ganking nerf than this? CCP this is just ridiculous. Please go back to your old ways of being a good developing company.
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:12:00 -
[278]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:13:59 Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:13:21
Originally by: Gaia Thorn I mean think of the carebears that cant mind veldspar cause chribba and his co-horts have stripped the systems in there unbeatbable machines.
Its a unfair advantage and should be corrected so that everyone conforms to the same standard of gameplay.
No one should stick out nor have any advantages over any one else
so the people with one of kind ships shouldn't have them?
edit:also a dread can't mine well, all it has is a large cargo bay. you're better off with a mining barge.
|
Eben Rochelle
Gallente LFC Executive Outcomes
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:13:00 -
[279]
Edited by: Eben Rochelle on 27/08/2008 10:13:07 doh nvm
|
Kuolematon
Space Perverts and Forum Warriors United
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:14:00 -
[280]
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:10:06
Originally by: Kuolematon Aww comoon people. Stop this maddness. Their game, their rules.
They want to remove caps from hisec for reason X .. so be it.
Stop this NERD RAGE now!
so you support them not telling us before hand?
edit: nerf the opux yatch, it's not fair for only one person to own it.
English, motherfracker, do you understand it?
"The Amarr are the tanking and ganking floating rods of goldcrap"
|
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:16:00 -
[281]
Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:16:24
Originally by: Kuolematon
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:10:06
Originally by: Kuolematon Aww comoon people. Stop this maddness. Their game, their rules.
They want to remove caps from hisec for reason X .. so be it.
Stop this NERD RAGE now!
so you support them not telling us before hand?
edit: nerf the opux yatch, it's not fair for only one person to own it.
English, motherfracker, do you understand it?
yes you said it's CCP's game and they do what they want when they want without telling anyone.
great I disagree with you, I believe they can do whatever they want, when they want, but in no way can they do this without telling those that will be effected.
the issue? you said it yourself reason X, you shouldn't have to post reason *fill in the blank*
|
Ordais
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:16:00 -
[282]
Originally by: Kuolematon
Originally by: MotherMoon Edited by: MotherMoon on 27/08/2008 10:10:06
Originally by: Kuolematon Aww comoon people. Stop this maddness. Their game, their rules.
They want to remove caps from hisec for reason X .. so be it.
Stop this NERD RAGE now!
so you support them not telling us before hand?
edit: nerf the opux yatch, it's not fair for only one person to own it.
English, motherfracker, do you understand it?
yep, their game, our money. allways good to frack off your customers for no reason (nano at least has a reason, but this?)
|
ApaKaka
Lone Starr Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:17:00 -
[283]
Originally by: Zeknichov Seriously the second devs introduced faction warfare everyone should have been suspicious. Then nano-nerf than hi-sec ganking nerf than this? CCP this is just ridiculous. Please go back to your old ways of being a good developing company.
CCP: Hai, we just hired the lead-developer from Sony Entertainment and Star Wars: Galaxies. We are going to see a wide range of fun changes and "expansions" the coming years. Thxbye.
Oh, and. **** you ccp, this is pretty much the last straw, I was already pretty disillusioned with your visions for the future, now I've lost all hope that you even care about the player made stories and content as well.
|
Frug
Repo Industries R.E.P.O.
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:18:00 -
[284]
There is SO MUCH STUFF that needs to be done with this game. They could use their manpower, even the GMs and higher ups who wasted however long they wasted discussing this issue, could have been doing numerous other things.
Instead they spend time making decisions like this.
This is garbage. There's no reason for it.
No, I don't have one. No, it doesn't affect me directly. Only the stupidity of these moves bugs me.
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |
Delectatio Morosa
Fatal's Marauders
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:18:00 -
[285]
This was a needless thing to do :(
|
MotherMoon
Huang Yinglong
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:20:00 -
[286]
Originally by: ApaKaka
Originally by: Zeknichov Seriously the second devs introduced faction warfare everyone should have been suspicious. Then nano-nerf than hi-sec ganking nerf than this? CCP this is just ridiculous. Please go back to your old ways of being a good developing company.
CCP: Hai, we just hired the lead-developer from Sony Entertainment and Star Wars: Galaxies. We are going to see a wide range of fun changes and "expansions" the coming years. Thxbye.
\
take it back, you haven't referred to the official tarminic post.
|
Frug
Repo Industries R.E.P.O.
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:24:00 -
[287]
Hi. We're CCP.
We're not going to give you a single dev blog for a month because we're all very busy taking vacations and going through the "growing pains" as we expand our company. We're very busy reassigning developers around and restructuring so that we can better serve you, our valued community. Until we can settle down and work things out, we hope that you will be patient with us because we will be very communicating and vocal with you as soon as we have the time.
Also, we just moved your high sec cap ships to low sec for no good reason! Toodles!
- - - - - - - - - Do not use dotted lines - - - - - - - If you think I'm awesome, say BOOO BOOO!! - Ductoris Neat look what I found - Kreul Hey, my marbles |
Nypon
Unseen University
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:24:00 -
[288]
Lets see,
1. Demios proposed changes. Not called for and totally clueless...
2. The speed "nerf". While necessary, the proposed changes showed that whoever tought them out did not play the game.
3. And now this, another UNNECESSARY change...
The high sec capitals have not as far as I know been abused in any way... and still there is some sort of "NEED" to fix them?
CCP, please stop FUBAR-ing things that do work in your wonderfull game and start fixing all those "intended feature" things that break it. |
Casino Alkasar
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:24:00 -
[289]
oh dang!
Well this highsec caps have been a rumor even my non eve-gamer friends knew of. _________________ itze mine RockŠn roll |
MellaRinn
Gallente Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:25:00 -
[290]
it does take the mick a little bit, tbh :/
✖Veto Corp. Officer✖ Click the sig 4 my vids |
|
Smagd
Encina Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:27:00 -
[291]
Actually, it WAS still possible to aquire high-sec capitals: They're on sale sometimes.
So the argument that it's impossible to get one is naff. The same argument would go for unique ships, like Tribal Issue Tempests or Opux Luxury Yachts or the Federal Issue Megathron or those Apotheosises.
If you want to nerf hard-to-get ships, why stop at unique ships? Get rid of faction ships, of capitals altogether, allow all those to fly each in one system only maybe, then replace all Tech 2 items with Tech 3 at three times the skill cost and half the performance and a dozen times the cost.
Then we'll all be force to fly frigates and be on equal footing.
Good game. *ironic smiley*
|
Sophia Germain
Fluxion
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:30:00 -
[292]
Chribba, it's quite simple for you to boycott what CCP did. Simply disable eve-files and anything related to it for a week. No doubt this will be a nuisance to players, but most of all, it will show CCP that they should give you at least some slack for all the free work you've put in to running such services.
|
DasDizzy
Developmental Neogenics Amalgamated
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:31:00 -
[293]
CCP... f**k you
|
iloni atoriandra
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:33:00 -
[294]
Iv been playing since 2004 but the last 6-8 months the actions CCP have taken have made me loose all faith in them.
Firstly there was the GTC thing with the "Industry Standard" prices, which was later admitted that it was basically a lie and they said they would be more open in the future.
Then all the other nerfs and catering to whiners and screwing over all the vets.
Now this. CCP have gone back on their word. They said when they stopped caps being able to be constructed that the caps already there could stay there forever as long as they werent used in combat. Now for some reason they completely go back on what they said previously and for no reason.
Way to get people to trust you CCP, its nice to know a company that has all my credit card details is so trustworthy and honest with its customers and playerbase. Oh and i think you messed up my billing for EON and STILL havent resolved it and paid me my money back
Chribba if i were you i would shutdown EVE Files and EVE Search with a big notice of why, deactivate your accounts (make sure to set a long skill) and then write a letter to the press about it and the direction CCP seem to be taking now. Im sure that would finally get their attention when the press start calling.
|
Dirk Magnum
Spearhead Endeavors
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:35:00 -
[295]
The fact that this thread has gone for ten pages without a Dev response suggests that this is a 10/10 troll by Chribba. Just MHO.
But if not, then CCP really does need to rethink their relocation of historic ships. Maybe the whole thing was just an accident? Some automated bit in Eve detected cap ships in High Sec and relocated them automatically?
Originally by: Sophia Germain Chribba, it's quite simple for you to boycott what CCP did. Simply disable eve-files and anything related to it for a week. No doubt this will be a nuisance to players, but most of all, it will show CCP that they should give you at least some slack for all the free work you've put in to running such services.
If Chribba wanted to ruin his good name and forever be remembered as the ultimate whiner, this would be the thing to do. Now recruiting! Click FFS! :X |
BiglipsMarie
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:37:00 -
[296]
Originally by: DasDizzy CCP... f**k you
Signed. And frankly, Chribba, if you boycott their behaviour by closing your services, a lot of us will back you. |
Kade Jeekin
Kinda'Shujaa
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:38:00 -
[297]
I lend my support to Chribba on this issue.
To those suggesting - even ironically - in order for this to make sense, that other historical elements of EVE should also be nerfed - Don't! We should all stand up to defend all of these harmless, but significant, elements that give the game some character.
If CCP truly wants the game history to be player generated, then this action of theirs can never make sense. |
Lazuran
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:43:00 -
[298]
The answer: Linkage
|
Zo5o
Gallente Longcat is Long
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:47:00 -
[299]
Originally by: Lazuran The answer: Linkage
Epic win in a sad thread.
|
Cygnus Zhada
Amarr Reckless Corsairs
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 10:54:00 -
[300]
Damnit Chribba, that sucks hardcore. Oddly it enough it strenghtens my belief about what has been happening; Changes that are made against past ideals and without acknowledging the past and it's past players, all in hopes to make as much cash short term to fund their new puppy.
- Tzar'rim
------------ We didn't want that boot.ini anyway |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 .. 41 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |