Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] .. 41 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Shevar
Minmatar A.W.M Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:04:00 -
[1171]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler I don't really see this as a community win. It appears that Chribba's dread was moved by some n00b GM on his first day/unaware of the rules. Chribba poasted here meanwhile I'm sure an escalation was ponderously making it's way through the system.
Noone else's hisec Capitals (mine wasn't plus one or two others in this thread) were affected so one assumes that this was down to a GM making a decision on the spot to some eejit's petition instead of a policy change by CCP.
This is not a case of special treatment, merely a mistake that has been put right.
For the 'Caps don't belong in Hisec crowd' Oh hi. Seeing as they can't engage in any form of remotely hostile activity (although I do miss the days of the Sobaseki Phoenix killing can flippers) I don't really understand the problem. Seeing as many empire mouthbreathers are unwilling to see hisec its the only chace a lot of people get to see a Cap ship. And yes they are unique in there own way. That doesn't mean that you will never own one, I was considering selling mine and I may get the urge again should my iskies run dry. Would you say the same thing about the Fedathron owner or the Impoc owner? Yes cap ships in lowsec and 0.0 exist but by being in Highsec that makes them unique, there are what, no more than a dozen. 4 Owners have posted in this thread. Get over yourselves. They do no harm to you and upset no delicate balance.
For the 'Mining in caps gives an unfair advantage'. You can pretty easily suicide gank proof yourself and 2.6 times the yield in a BS. LOL at the person who claimed that Chribba could help a friendly alliance by mining in a Suicide proof ship. You people are pathetic killjoys. We mine in caps for a reason and that reason is not profit.
Read that post by the GM.
If you petition to have it moved back it will be moved back. --- -The only real drug problem is scoring real good drugs |
Larkonis Trassler
Neo Spartans
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:23:00 -
[1172]
Originally by: Shevar
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler I don't really see this as a community win. It appears that Chribba's dread was moved by some n00b GM on his first day/unaware of the rules. Chribba poasted here meanwhile I'm sure an escalation was ponderously making it's way through the system.
Noone else's hisec Capitals (mine wasn't plus one or two others in this thread) were affected so one assumes that this was down to a GM making a decision on the spot to some eejit's petition instead of a policy change by CCP.
This is not a case of special treatment, merely a mistake that has been put right.
For the 'Caps don't belong in Hisec crowd' Oh hi. Seeing as they can't engage in any form of remotely hostile activity (although I do miss the days of the Sobaseki Phoenix killing can flippers) I don't really understand the problem. Seeing as many empire mouthbreathers are unwilling to see hisec its the only chace a lot of people get to see a Cap ship. And yes they are unique in there own way. That doesn't mean that you will never own one, I was considering selling mine and I may get the urge again should my iskies run dry. Would you say the same thing about the Fedathron owner or the Impoc owner? Yes cap ships in lowsec and 0.0 exist but by being in Highsec that makes them unique, there are what, no more than a dozen. 4 Owners have posted in this thread. Get over yourselves. They do no harm to you and upset no delicate balance.
For the 'Mining in caps gives an unfair advantage'. You can pretty easily suicide gank proof yourself and 2.6 times the yield in a BS. LOL at the person who claimed that Chribba could help a friendly alliance by mining in a Suicide proof ship. You people are pathetic killjoys. We mine in caps for a reason and that reason is not profit.
Read that post by the GM.
If you petition to have it moved back it will be moved back.
Quote:
Noone else's hisec Capitals (mine wasn't plus one or two others in this thread) were affected
Quote:
Noone else's hisec Capitals (mine wasn't plus one or two others in this thread) were affected
Quote:
Noone else's hisec Capitals (mine wasn't plus one or two others in this thread) were affected
Reading comprehension ftl Assumption of Risk |
Drunk Driver
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:32:00 -
[1173]
Dude, I want big giant text.
How do I get big giant text?
It's not fair if others have big giant text and I don't.
. |
Oli Robbo
Gallente Galactic Defence Syndicate Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:33:00 -
[1174]
Edited by: Oli Robbo on 28/08/2008 15:35:03 I havent been bothered to read all of the posts, but i know that he got his dread back and people are debating whether or no it's an 'unfair advantage' for him to mine with it...
To you specific guys who are insistant on posting to stop him from mining in it due to an 'unfair tank' i've noticed that you're not carebears, right?..well, neither am I, And i'm sure you enjoy watching other people's posted videos/screenshots of pvp battles etc on the forums, [as I do]...
The question you have to ask yourself is; who supports that site that the *majority* of those videos are hosted on ? Chribba.
And although I don't believe in 'one rule for one, another rule for another' I think you guys should actually sit down and think about how much this man does for the EVE community... [and you can't even say he's buying his way back through brown-nosing, as EVEfiles is completely seperate to CCP].
Live and let live.
|
Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:34:00 -
[1175]
Originally by: Drunk Driver
Dude, I want big giant text.
How do I get big giant text?
It's not fair if others have big giant text and I don't.
.
Text can only be giant if it was made giant before giant text was disallowed. If this is the case and your text was downsized, you may petition to have it restored. -
DesuSigs |
5pinDizzy
Amarr Umpteenth Podding
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:42:00 -
[1176]
Originally by: Oli Robbo
The question you have to ask yourself is; who supports that sight that the *majority* of those videos are hosted on ? Chribba.
Chribba owns youtube?
HOLY SHIT!
Just wondering though, by what logic to you come up with "If player has got/done website/help for community, player get's x ingame, just because..."
As I would like a Titan, but not willing to pay $5000 in GTC's to get one etc...
But if I come up with something, I dunno, christmas presents for the children of eve players or something, do I get popularised and have it pushed forth in my favour?
I'm not saying take Chribbas veldnaught out of Amarr, I'm saying I think your logic is flawed.
|
Asuka SoryuLangley
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:52:00 -
[1177]
Edited by: Asuka SoryuLangley on 28/08/2008 15:52:46
Originally by: GM Grimmi
3. You may not use your capital shipÆs attributes to gain any sort of advantage over other players while in high security space.
Mining in a capital ship while in high security space is a huge advantage.
Of course you will allow that, becouse Chribba do, and that is why you get them back: becouse Chribba cryied.
Shame.
|
Midnight Firestarter
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:53:00 -
[1178]
Edited by: Midnight Firestarter on 28/08/2008 15:54:44 Capitals in highsec = no ....
Rules are rules, no matter who you are or what support you have given the community doesn't justify a select few being treated differently from everyone else.
As far as I'm concerned it should have been long removed to low sec...
|
Asuka SoryuLangley
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:53:00 -
[1179]
Originally by: Midnight Firestarter Capitals in highsec = no ....
Rules are rules, no matter who you are or what support you have given the community doesn't justify a select few being treated differently from everyone else.
As far as I'm concerned you were lucky that it was this long before it was removed ...
Firestarter for president.
|
Drunk Driver
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:54:00 -
[1180]
Originally by: Crumplecorn
Originally by: Drunk Driver
Dude, I want big giant text.
How do I get big giant text?
It's not fair if others have big giant text and I don't.
.
Text can only be giant if it was made giant before giant text was disallowed. If this is the case and your text was downsized, you may petition to have it restored.
I've never had big giant text. I guess I'm out of luck.
. |
|
Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 15:55:00 -
[1181]
It's amusing to see people so sore over not being 'special'. There are people with far more unfair advantages in the game which they got within the rules. But the rules are a good excuse to get someone who you see as 'better' than you taken down a peg, eh.
WTS: Insecurity and tears. -
DesuSigs |
Drunk Driver
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 16:06:00 -
[1182]
Originally by: Crumplecorn It's amusing to see people so sore over not being 'special'. There are people with far more unfair advantages in the game which they got within the rules. But the rules are a good excuse to get someone who you see as 'better' than you taken down a peg, eh.
WTS: Insecurity and tears.
So you're saying you have a lot of insecurity and tears you're trying to get rid of?
. |
Cygnus Zhada
Amarr Reckless Corsairs
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 16:10:00 -
[1183]
Edited by: Cygnus Zhada on 28/08/2008 16:10:36
|
Zen Guerrilla
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 16:45:00 -
[1184]
The amount of jelous people in this thread is just awesome.
So much fun to read.
----------------------------- Not an alt. And proud of it.
|
Haldane IV
Einstein's Dreams
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 16:53:00 -
[1185]
CCP certainly dropped the ball here, but Grimmi has recovered the fumble as far as I am concerned.
|
Ecks Orion
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 18:28:00 -
[1186]
Originally by: Asuka SoryuLangley Edited by: Asuka SoryuLangley on 28/08/2008 15:52:46
Originally by: GM Grimmi
3. You may not use your capital shipÆs attributes to gain any sort of advantage over other players while in high security space.
Mining in a capital ship while in high security space is a huge advantage.
Of course you will allow that, becouse Chribba do, and that is why you get them back: becouse Chribba cryied.
Shame.
No, it's not a huge advantage. Please explain how mining in a Cap in the Amarr system is an advantage.
|
Kyra Felann
Gallente Noctis Fleet Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 19:07:00 -
[1187]
I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
|
Larkonis Trassler
Neo Spartans
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 19:51:00 -
[1188]
Originally by: Kyra Felann I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
The point is that before yesterday there were no set rules merely guidelines. Now there are rules.
Cry harder. Assumption of Risk |
Haradgrim
Tyrell Corp INTERDICTION
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 20:12:00 -
[1189]
Originally by: Kyra Felann I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
This is not just about Chribba's icon status, the dozens of posts like this make me wonder how much the average player knows about EVE's history and the decisions and positions the dev's have previously taken. The fact that he is an icon just rallied a lot more people to his cause, it was a legitimate cause however. --
Originally by: CCP Oveur ...every forum whine feels like a baby pony is getting killed
|
Cpt Branko
Surge.
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 20:25:00 -
[1190]
Originally by: Kyra Felann I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
Before Grimmi posted there were no rules to be enforced. Now rules are there and they're being enforced. Well?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
|
Sodium Phosphate
Gallente Killer Koalas Kingdom of Butan
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 20:26:00 -
[1191]
Originally by: Kyra Felann I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
Care to quote just those rules? And don't say that capital ships are not allowed in high sec, or werent allowed in high sec. You'll just prove yourself wrong. They clearly were and are, as long as they follow the previous guidelines and current rules.
|
Highwind Cid
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 20:33:00 -
[1192]
Forty(40) pages over a single character in a mining dreadnought. Wow, just wow.
|
5pinDizzy
Amarr Umpteenth Podding
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 20:40:00 -
[1193]
That's nothing Cid. If they still hadn't have given Chribba his Veldnaught back we'd be on about page 200 by now, and all posts would have degenerated into "ugh ugh, smash ccp".
I don't know about you but I've never had any of my reimbursement petitions answered in a matter of hours.
Did anyone work out whether or not he's still allowed to mine in it?
|
Sodium Phosphate
Gallente Killer Koalas Kingdom of Butan
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 21:04:00 -
[1194]
Originally by: 5pinDizzy That's nothing Cid. If they still hadn't have given Chribba his Veldnaught back we'd be on about page 200 by now, and all posts would have degenerated into "ugh ugh, smash ccp".
I don't know about you but I've never had any of my reimbursement petitions answered in a matter of hours.
Did anyone work out whether or not he's still allowed to mine in it?
He should be able to, I think... Not quite sure tho.
|
Malcanis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.08.28 21:05:00 -
[1195]
Originally by: Highwind Cid Forty(40) pages over a single character in a mining dreadnought. Wow, just wow.
Yeah, it's almost as if he is actually someone special in this game.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |
Kyra Felann
Gallente Noctis Fleet Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 03:27:00 -
[1196]
Ok, maybe not rules, but apparently it was decided to move high-sec capitals to low sec and it looks like the decision was reversed because it happened to someone who's popular (for good reason or not isn't the issue). If it'd happened to some unknown person, the original decision could have very well stood because there wouldn't have been a massive thread full of people complaining about it.
This reminds me of the change to clean up anchored cans that weren't touched for 30 days and the outcry over it because of a "cemetery" and other can spam that had become famous and/or popular. At least CCP stuck to their guns in that case.
|
Ho HsienKo
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 04:13:00 -
[1197]
Originally by: Kyra Felann Ok, maybe not rules, but apparently it was decided to move high-sec capitals to low sec and it looks like the decision was reversed because it happened to someone who's popular (for good reason or not isn't the issue). If it'd happened to some unknown person, the original decision could have very well stood because there wouldn't have been a massive thread full of people complaining about it.
This reminds me of the change to clean up anchored cans that weren't touched for 30 days and the outcry over it because of a "cemetery" and other can spam that had become famous and/or popular. At least CCP stuck to their guns in that case.
Did you own Jenny Spitfire after the original and just before the present owner?
Just curious
|
SSgt Sniper
Gallente MAIDS
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 04:39:00 -
[1198]
Originally by: Haradgrim
Originally by: Kyra Felann I think rules should be enforced no matter what sort of "icon status" you or others think you have.
This is not just about Chribba's icon status, the dozens of posts like this make me wonder how much the average player knows about EVE's history and the decisions and positions the dev's have previously taken. The fact that he is an icon just rallied a lot more people to his cause, it was a legitimate cause however.
Less and less every day, to answer your question.
------- CEO of Maids. No I didn't pick the name. I've grown rather fond of it though.
|
SSgt Sniper
Gallente MAIDS
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 04:44:00 -
[1199]
Edited by: SSgt Sniper on 29/08/2008 04:45:44 Edited by: SSgt Sniper on 29/08/2008 04:44:42 Edited by: SSgt Sniper on 29/08/2008 04:44:04
Originally by: Kyra Felann Ok, maybe not rules, but apparently it was decided to move high-sec capitals to low sec and it looks like the decision was reversed because it happened to someone who's popular (for good reason or not isn't the issue). If it'd happened to some unknown person, the original decision could have very well stood because there wouldn't have been a massive thread full of people complaining about it.
This reminds me of the change to clean up anchored cans that weren't touched for 30 days and the outcry over it because of a "cemetery" and other can spam that had become famous and/or popular. At least CCP stuck to their guns in that case.
wait for it, wait for it....
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler No one else's hisec Capitals (including mine) were affected
wait for it.......
there you go. ------- CEO of Maids. No I didn't pick the name. I've grown rather fond of it though.
|
Alaknor Dresden
|
Posted - 2008.08.29 05:27:00 -
[1200]
Originally by: Midnight Firestarter Edited by: Midnight Firestarter on 28/08/2008 15:54:44 Capitals in highsec = no ....
Rules are rules, no matter who you are or what support you have given the community doesn't justify a select few being treated differently from everyone else.
As far as I'm concerned it should have been long removed to low sec...
Amen.
This.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 [40] .. 41 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |