Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 35 post(s) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4241

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Recently CCP rewarded the staff members of SOMER Blink, the highly popular micro lottery website, with Ishukone Watch Scorpions (IWS) as a thank-you for their contributions to EVE. There was also the matter of a recent special lottery event at SOMER Blink that CCP supported by contributing rare ships as prizes. This has raised concern in the community, with some calling favoritism and others airing opposition to CCP spawning items into the single-shard sandbox we all love, whether as rewards to third-party contributors, or prizes for them to hand out.
So letGÇÖs go through what happened, why it happened, what else has happened, and then letGÇÖs have a discussion on what all of us want to happen in the future.
First, what is the Ishukone Watch Scorpion?
ItGÇÖs a re-skinned version of the Scorpion-class battleship, with the old Scorpion slot layout and slightly worse stats than the current Scorpion when it comes to functionality. It refines to 1 piece of Tritanium and as such is designed specifically to have no actual base value in the gameGÇÖs economy, similar to the rookie frigates handed out for free when you suffer a ship loss. The IWS was originally created as a vanity item to be sold in the NeX store for Aurum, but once that plan was cancelled, the Community Team secured it as a promotional item to be given out for various efforts or events.
In its very essence, the IWS is a skin with its own GÇ£show infoGÇ¥ description. But while thatGÇÖs certainly an important thing to realize, we of course recognize that rare items you can sell on TQ will be coveted and will have some value through the law of supply and demand despite a lack of base value or actual functionality.
How many exist and who have you given them to?
A total of 132 exist on TQ today, all handed out by CCP as that is the only way for them to come into existence. The first one went to the winner of the 2012 Fanfest Poker Tournament. Subsequent ones have been given to participants of various PVP tournaments, the 2013 Poker Tournament, the winner of the BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL) and most recently the staff of SOMER blink. Giving these particular ships out as rewards for services rendered is a relatively new initiative and we intended to gift them to more fansites and contributors; however, those plans are currently on hold.
Why hasnGÇÖt my favorite fansite or community enterprise received something nice too?
ThereGÇÖs no single answer to that question. Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or theyGÇÖve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, CollectorGÇÖs editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc.
Something to keep in mind is that the Community Team hasnGÇÖt always had the ability to give prizes or thank-you rewards to major long standing fansite operators like we would have wanted, but times change and we hope that those long-time contributors at least appreciate that we are trying to do better in that regard, specific rewards, quantities, and situations aside.
How do these recent events compare with previous ones?
Regarding the handing out of prizes for third-party events, weGÇÖve always seen value in providing reasonable prizes to boost interest in events run by enthusiastic and capable players. ThereGÇÖs value in it for us as a company and for you as a community. What constitutes GÇ£reasonableGÇ¥ is always a judgment call that has to do with the history we have with the operator, the scope of the event, and the attention and participation the event can draw. Tl;dr, big event = bigger prizes. Not every event gets the same but we of course want to avoid any feelings of unfairness or resentment and we should be able to avoid that with increased transparency and by working with you guys and the CSM (more on that in the last section of this post).
Now on to the personal reward
The IWS is a cool thing to have and thatGÇÖs why we use it as a reward, not because it carries X ISK value. The price people negotiate is wholly decided between individuals and is hard for us to predict with any precision.
In the past we have given out time codes and PLEX both as prizes and rewards for going the extra mile for the community. These have been given to just about every major fansite at some point and PLEX have a much more predictable value over time than skinned ships.
The rewards for the SOMER Blink staff was around three times larger than the one to the SCL staff but thatGÇÖs because they have three times the staff. In both cases everyone got one each.
When we gave out thousands of pirate-skinned rookie frigates to players at PAX East and Gamescom, they initially sold for 1 billion ISK in-game without causing stir. Obviously those were less rare from the get-go and were handed out fairly randomly in the familiar environment of GÇ£go to game show GÇô get swagGÇ¥.
So the concerns raised seem to revolve around quantity, the selection process of the recipients, and the level of transparency. Which leads me to the next question.
Was CCP being secretive about this?
We really werenGÇÖt. In his leaked mail, SOMER asks his staff to keep this reward on the down-low but that requirement didnGÇÖt come from us at all and is completely their prerogative. When we give rewards or prizes, we often donGÇÖt announce it specifically but we donGÇÖt ask for secrecy either nor do we expect it at all.
ItGÇÖs worth noting that when the SCL staff got their IWSs there was public chatter about it, it just didnGÇÖt get a lot of attention. It wasnGÇÖt until articles appeared about the reward to the SOMER Blink staff which also hinted at some secrecy that concerns were raised.
So, are you totally happy with this whole thing?
No weGÇÖre not. While we want to keep rewarding and encouraging projects that add value and are popular with our community, we absolutely agree that it has to happen in a way that the community is on board with, whether that means we have to make big changes or small tweaks.
We recognize that gifting rare in-game items of potential ISK value proactively to select third-parties, whether as prizes for them to hand out or as a personal thank-you, can have implications no matter how well-meaning you are. We realize that for example in the IWS reward situation, a line was crossed in many peopleGÇÖs minds despite there being certain similarities with previous gifting events. Where the li... CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1299
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
First! Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |
|

CCP Manifest
C C P C C P Alliance
859

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:35:00 -
[3] - Quote
Thanks to the CSM for their help thusfar and players who have already given their feedback.
======== o7 CCP Manifest | Public Relations and Social Media | @ccp_manifest |
|

Maximus Andendare
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
624
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Thanks for the statement. Step onto the battlefield, and you're already dead, born again at the end of the battle to live on and fight another day.
>> Play Dust 514 FREE! Sign up for exclusive gear today! << |

CorryBasler
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
first page comment! |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5214
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. |

Forlorn Wongraven
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
78
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks Guard! Shadoo > whoever was the first nyx on grid Shadoo > THANK GOD YOU ARE A SMART MAN and fitted the best tank in PL Shadoo > (ie. cyno) |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1261
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ideally sponsorship will come in the form of items that are not insanely valuable (magnates etc) and do not impact the sandbox in any meaningful way. ISK is highly meaningful.
Sponsorship should also be limited to non-profits like Chribba's EVE Files, or The angel project, or possibly EVE UNI. Things that enrich the community and are not simply large scale businesses that send a lot of time card revenue CCP's way. Out of game items are much preferable to ingame ones. T-Shirts, or Rifter Hubs, or other various marketing swag. It would be preferable if game-time was given in such a way it cannot be easily monetized, perhaps game-time directly applied to an account.
These guidelines may not always be preferable and some exceptions may occur but those should be screened through the CSM. Everything should strive to keep the sandbox as pure as possible. Vanity items would be perfect for this. I can see CCP giving out 1000 free ship skins sometime down the road when you introduce that feature. Things that are nice to receive as a player but have no impact on the sandbox.
Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Seras VictoriaX
Relentless Grind
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Out of game rewards only please.
|

Kate stark
569
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
it doesn't matter if you didn't announce it or didn't ask for secrecy. by not announcing it, you simply weren't being transparent. i don't think transparency is a big ask. i mean a quick "oh and for their awesome initiative, the guys at somer have been given IWS" at the bottom of their spotlight article would have taken seconds to type and avoided most of the issue.
also, yes, rewards for these kinds of things should be kept to non-transferable and/or out of game stuff. when you essentially just dump a few billion isk in to a player's hangar... do i really need to explain why just handing players a fist full of isk is wrong?
nobody is saying that they don't want you to reward people in the community who add something to the experience of eve, we're just asking you to be transparent about it, and not do it in such a way that it gives some one an advantage over some one else no matter how small or unintended.
even better, would be a set of written guidelines you can refer to and say "well, we did it all legitimately on our side." because had there been an devblog prior to the spotlight articles saying "we're going to start actively rewarding people in the community that do great stuff with some cool scorpions" then none of this would be a surprise, none of it would have been a secret, and the only issue we would have had would have been "uh guys, might want to rethink the reward if you're essentially handing out fist fulls of isk as "rewards"" Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

iskflakes
701
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:47:00 -
[11] - Quote
When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. - |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4249

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem.
I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event.
Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites.
As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

gr ant
Blackwater USA Inc. Pandemic Legion
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
LOL goons bringing in alts to reiterate their posts.
this isn't really that big of a deal, CCP never promised they would not give anymore of these outs unlike other unique ships. lots of jelly folks |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3794
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
I'm still scratching my head about what these "great contributions" are exactly that SB made to EVE that CCP and others keep referring to.
Is out of game gambling for isk and in-game swag via a 3rd party for-profit entity considered creating content? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

A Research Alt
Perkone Caldari State
128
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:54:00 -
[15] - Quote
This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
577
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame.
It does not matter if it's a Video, a blogpost or a whole Tournament. Some people put so many hours into fan projects and they deserved at least something. It does not matter if it's ISK or just a thank you.
Bloggers already get their media account, how about something for those awesome video makers from /my eve/? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Synthetic Cultist
Church of The Crimson Saviour
242
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world.
Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist.
Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing.
Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ?
Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4249

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:54:00 -
[18] - Quote
iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever.
That argument I would agree with in regards to certain rare items, but not the ISW as it was created for the express purpose of being a reward for all kinds of contributions and contests, making it inevitable that the price of the early ones will plummet. The problem more people would have with it is much rather that those who get it early gain more by selling it than those who get it late, which is a byproduct of slowly seeding rare items in this manner. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

I've got himtackled
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts. Okay.
CCP Guard wrote:Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Yes. I don't care if Somer gets a dozen USB hub Rifters.
CCP Guard wrote:Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? No. Bound items are terrible and dumb.
CCP Guard wrote:Give no personal rewards and only prizes? In-game items yes. Out of game stuff no.
CCP Guard wrote:Only items below a certain expected ISK value? No, mostly because that doesn't work in Eve. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4250

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:56:00 -
[20] - Quote
Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks Guard!
Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :) CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
I think my biggest problem with the whole situation is that I feel CCP is awarding a straight up gambling enterprise simply because they help sell plexes.
When you give out upwards of 400+ billion ISK in rare ships to 'the house' who is already raking in ISK hand-over-fist it seems lame as hell. Not today spaghetti. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1422
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:57:00 -
[22] - Quote
Seras VictoriaX wrote:Out of game rewards only please.
^^^ This. This is not a signature. |

Kate stark
571
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 18:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event.
Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites.
As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
if they're good at what they do, why do they need to be given extra things to profit from?
It's not like you need blink in order to get gifts out to your average joe player. you've shown you can do that in many ways. for example the player count record thing when everyone emailed you a guess at the number. things dropped from wrecks in dev roams, etc.
also, this is really something some one else said and i'm just repeating, if you're giving things to blink and giving them cool ships to give away, why would any one play with one of blinks competitors when they've essentially been priced out of the market because you're handing blink prizes they can't compete with? (although i'm not sure that's a very compelling point, but i guess it's worth asking all the same)
due to the fact that it has been 2 acts of benevolence towards blink, and none to anyone doing similar things to blink it's very easy to interpret it as "favouritism" even if it isn't and it's just CCP exploring new avenues. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1299
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:01:00 -
[24] - Quote
First!
-Edit-
I believe it's sad when CCP has to think before they reward.
There was over 100 ISW "spawned" before this whole fiasco started. Why wasn't this an issue then and why now? Not only that, but plans to release more?
As the players of this universe, we set the prices of everything contained within. Its annoying watching some peoples reactions on this matter.... "T20 2.0" or "CCP gave Trillions to SOMER."
It's NOT T20 2.0 because the ships are not game breaking. It's not trillions of ISK either, do the bloody math! The cheapest ISW I seen was 10 Bil, 10 x 30 = 300 Bil, not even halfway to Trillion!
The people who've invested a lot of ISK from buying them is obviously going to be at a greater loss, thus more upset. It's the same as any investment IRL, it has a chance to loose its value.
People should stop complaining about not receiving free shinys, Get off your lazy asses and earn it!
(This was a first post, until it was removed as I was writing my reply, not cool.) Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
2073
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:01:00 -
[25] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Ideally sponsorship will come in the form of items that are not insanely valuable (magnates etc) and do not impact the sandbox in any meaningful way. ISK is highly meaningful.
there is no difference between a painted magante and a painted scorpion. Both are useless but rare. The fact that the scorpion sells higher is because there are more people which want this particular useless but rare item.
CCP does not give out ISK. The item you get only allows you to transfer isk from people who collect useless but rare items to people who don't.
thats all. eve style bounties (done) dust boarding parties imagine there is war and everybody cloaks - join FW |

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
727
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:05:00 -
[26] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
These guys are good at making ISK so we will give them an unrestricted working permit for a brand new gold mine only them will have access to. It's not like it gives an in-game advantage like a T2 BPO would tho since they have a website to handle the tapping instead of stations in game for production. |

Kate stark
571
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:05:00 -
[27] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:There was over 100 ISW "spawned" before this whole fiasco started. Why wasn't this an issue then and why now? Not only that, but plans to release more? because the ISW was the prize for the poker tournament, hence it was announced.
and the poker tournament was open to any one (i assume) and as such it was available to "everyone" and not just some one that CCP decided deserved it based on an unknown set of criteria. also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1422
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:05:00 -
[28] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame.
It does not matter if it's a Video, a blogpost or a whole Tournament. Some people put so many hours into fan projects and they deserved at least something. It does not matter if it's ISK or just a thank you.
Bloggers already get their media account, how about something for those awesome video makers from /my eve/?
This is not a signature. |

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
727
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote: As the players of this universe, we set the prices of everything contained within. Its annoying watching some peoples reactions on this matter.... "T20 2.0" or "CCP gave Trillions to SOMER."
The close to a trillion accusation comes from the previous gift package, not the ISW. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4254

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:08:00 -
[30] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame.
It does not matter if it's a Video, a blogpost or a whole Tournament. Some people put so many hours into fan projects and they deserved at least something. It does not matter if it's ISK or just a thank you.
Bloggers already get their media account, how about something for those awesome video makers from /my eve/?
The video makers from My EVE are awesome contributors and it would be cool to find a way to encourage and reward them more. We have done things like just send someone a T-shirt or a ship model for catching our attention in a big way but we should look at what we can do more when we design our framework for this. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
363
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:08:00 -
[31] - Quote
In the future I would suggest sticking to gifting plexes and the like. No one (or at least not many) would have batted an eye if you gave Somer 30 plexes. Nex clothes would also work.
Giving out unique ships in a spaceship sandbox....eh......not the best idea. |

Gamer4liff
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:09:00 -
[32] - Quote
No in game isk-bringing rewards sounds about right to me honestly. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1299
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:09:00 -
[33] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:There was over 100 ISW "spawned" before this whole fiasco started. Why wasn't this an issue then and why now? Not only that, but plans to release more? because the ISW was the prize for the poker tournament, hence it was announced. and the poker tournament was open to any one (i assume) and as such it was available to "everyone" and not just some one that CCP decided deserved it based on an unknown set of criteria. also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You failed to read this part...
CCP Guard wrote: The first one went to the winner of the 2012 Fanfest Poker Tournament. Subsequent ones have been given to participants of various PVP tournaments, the 2013 Poker Tournament, the winner of the BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL) and most recently the staff of SOMER blink. Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

ShadowandLight
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
217
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:09:00 -
[34] - Quote
Here's the million dollar question
what else has CCP secretly given out to pilots, communities, player run organizations?
EveServers.info - Fully configured web server for your corp / alliance TS3 / Mumble / Jabber / SMF Forums + Temar's Mod / CMS Website / ECM / EVEWSpace https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=266284 |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
578
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them.
You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Kate stark
571
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:09:00 -
[36] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:In the future I would suggest sticking to gifting plexes and the like. No one (or at least not many) would have batted an eye if you gave SOMER 30 plexes. and even less if CCP would have just credited each blink employee with a month or two of game time and cut out the middle man. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Harvey James
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
538
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:10:00 -
[37] - Quote
i agree that ONLY out of game items should be given .... i also despise ISK giving in large quantities like bloody lotteries .. kind of destroys the point of having to earn isk the hard way like everyone else and the sense of achievement making isk off your own time and effort...
i would also like pirate noob ships to be cheap and attainable for all Tech 3's need to be multi role ships not cruiser hulls with battleship tank and insane resists ABC's are clearly T2 in all but name AB's need a buff-á like a big mass reduction ... module tiercide FTW role based instead of tiers please. |

Kate stark
571
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:10:00 -
[38] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless.
doesn't matter; because that's not what i said.
my point was; running blink is their day-to-day activity. playing poker is not a day-to-day activity for eve players as there's no poker mini-game. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2651
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:10:00 -
[39] - Quote
Don't let the jealous screw up everyone else's fun. The ONLY problem with the ISW giveaways is that you gave so few of them out! I mean come on CCP... you've been running the most complex video game economy ever for 10 years and you don't know that? I don't believe that for a second. Not one. If you had dropped a bunch on the community it would be fine. Nobody would care. They are common and so they become worthless. Give them a slight handicap and give them away in bulk and you won't have a problem. So, be transparent about the numbers (because the markets need to know that) and don't create awards that us collectors are going to drive the price up on into the billions, otherwise you are giving away advantages. Also, the more you do this, and the more "special edition" assets are out there, the less people will care about them and the cheaper future gimped skin-job freebee ships will be. Somewhat self correcting over time, but just think about the market. Easy.
Second, I'd like to talk about the Gold Magnate. You should make more of them. Give them out as super high LP rewards. It's a shame not to use that model. Really silly in fact. Also, You should do the same for the serpentis corp and the guardian vex. I know this will lower the value on mine and I don't care. These are faction ships... it makes sense in the lore and just as a game to actually let the players USE them!
So those are my thoughts. Hope someone reads them.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

A Research Alt
Perkone Caldari State
130
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:12:00 -
[40] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Should we stick to out-of-game things only?
Yes.
Quote:Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards?
No. Absolutely totally 100% no.
Quote:Give no personal rewards and only prizes?
Not really sure what the difference there is supposed to be.
Quote:Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out?
You shouldn't be giving out cash rewards in the first place.
Quote:List all rewards publicly?
Absolutely. And list the reasoning behind them--something you still have not done for Somer Blink's rewards. |
|

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
363
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:12:00 -
[41] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:In the future I would suggest sticking to gifting plexes and the like. No one (or at least not many) would have batted an eye if you gave SOMER 30 plexes. and even less if CCP would have just credited each blink employee with a month or two of game time and cut out the middle man. Yeah, this is an even better idea tbh. I think its possible to reward people without compromising the integrity of the spaceship sandbox. |

A Research Alt
Perkone Caldari State
130
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
At the beginning of this, you say you'll cover why this happened, but you don't say why Somer Blink actually got anything, let alone the massive amount they received. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4255

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used.
The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well.
We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Rosen Thornn
House of Nightshade
21
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:In the future I would suggest sticking to gifting plexes and the like. No one (or at least not many) would have batted an eye if you gave Somer 30 plexes. Nex clothes would also work.
Giving out unique ships in a spaceship sandbox....eh......not the best idea.
What is the difference between NEX clothes and IWS? |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
394
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:22:00 -
[45] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
The problem is this reeks of 'Greed is Good' at the moment and the secret nature in which SOMER wanted it handled only makes it seem that much worse.
I haven't heard of SOMER helping anyone in game. I don't gamble with them so maybe I'm in the dark here but the only service I see that they provide is taking peoples ISK through gambling and the only reason they got a reward from CCP is that they help sell plexes. Not today spaghetti. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1423
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:24:00 -
[46] - Quote
If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system? This is not a signature. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:24:00 -
[47] - Quote
thanks for the dev blog, so far I'm liking what I read. the recent events had me quite alarmed and i did not renew the first round of my accounts that expired, awaiting CCP response first.
so, with the rewards program currently suspended and being looking at again in light of current happenings, i take it that the number of scorpion ishukone watch present in game now will remain stable and any new giveaways will be using new prizes, which are hopefully out of game or non-transferable? as some others mentioned prior, even some plex wouldn't be bad, as those can also be used for stuff like subscription or re-sculpts. just please, no more rare items! |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:25:00 -
[48] - Quote
Rosen Thornn wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:In the future I would suggest sticking to gifting plexes and the like. No one (or at least not many) would have batted an eye if you gave Somer 30 plexes. Nex clothes would also work.
Giving out unique ships in a spaceship sandbox....eh......not the best idea. What is the difference between NEX clothes and IWS? there is no difference. the monocles which PL and somer acquired are selling for billions on the forums and via contracts. the rarity of the item is what drives the demand, regardless or what the item actually is. |

Gilbaron
Free-Space-Ranger Nulli Secunda
1102
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:26:00 -
[49] - Quote
free RL-Swag would be much more appreciated We are recruiting german-speaking PVP players, contact me :)
Banner was used for this Post |

Jake Rivers
Senex Legio Gryphon League
182
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:28:00 -
[50] - Quote
I never had a problem with CCP giving out vanity items as a reward to a fansite and I feel it was all blown out of proportion by our own EVE media, way to go guys.
These things are not game changing and at most they create some quality tears of the ones who are jealous, and it sure the hell didn't rate anything even close to a jita riot.
Keep up the good work CCP you guys are doing great work with all our new improvements. Senex Legio |
|

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:28:00 -
[51] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
When we gave out thousands of pirate-skinned rookie frigates to players at PAX East and Gamescom, they initially sold for 1 billion ISK in-game without causing stir. Obviously those were less rare from the get-go and were handed out fairly randomly in the familiar environment of GÇ£go to game show GÇô get swagGÇ¥.
I would point out that the PAX east event covered a broad cross-section of the player base and had a uniform distribution of "swag". The Eve Vegas event favored a particular group of players. Moreover, the event significantly increased traffic to their for-profit site, increasing their revenue both in terms of isk and RL $$$. By using Blink (and thereby contributing Profits to Somer), players perceived that their chance to acquire "swag" increased.
By giving out the eve Vegas prizes through Blink participation, CCP effectively drove a significant amount of traffic to Blink, which seemed to be a case of favoritism. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3797
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[52] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
"the time was right to do stuff with them" is extremely vague. How about disclosing what the exact criteria was in this case?
What was SB's "great contribution" to EVE exactly?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4258

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[53] - Quote
ShadowandLight wrote:Here's the million dollar question
what else has CCP secretly given out to pilots, communities, player run organizations?
Secretly...nothing. And what we've given out as rewards or prizes doesn't generally come in big bundles which is one of the key reasons eyebrows were raised over this incident.
It's worth keeping in mind that Internal Affairs has complete oversight over every single item spawned or transferred on our server and monitors all staff account activity closely as is their purpose. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[54] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote: I haven't heard of SOMER helping anyone in game. I don't gamble with them so maybe I'm in the dark here but the only service I see that they provide is taking peoples ISK through gambling and the only reason they got a reward from CCP is that they help sell plexes.
They give away ISK and goodies for community events or related stuff.
Like videos, podcast, tournament and so on.
I don't know any details though. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites.
No, you mentioned one site that the community already knew about - SCL.
How many did they get? Who else got them? How many did these entities get?
What I'm driving at, is 30 a lot, or a little, a whole lot, or average to give out to an organization. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1300
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[56] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things. The problem is this reeks of 'Greed is Good' at the moment and the secret nature in which SOMER wanted it handled only makes it seem that much worse. I haven't heard of SOMER helping anyone in game. I don't gamble with them so maybe I'm in the dark here but the only service I see that they provide is taking peoples ISK through gambling and the only reason they got a reward from CCP is that they help sell plexes. A SOMER Director is a regular at a Monthly EVE meet I help with. He donated tens of billions in prizes in August. And gave 250 Mil to everyone in attendance last Christmas...
Now you have heard of SOMER helping people when they didn't really need to, but wanted to! Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[57] - Quote
A well written and reasonable response.
Just a few things:
1. Both in this response and in the original threads and articles related to the incident, there is an assumption that because this has happened before, nothing is different. But what seems to have been overlooked is that most players were never aware those things happened either. I, for one, was surprised to learn only a few months ago that certain fansites receive free subscriptions. Today I was surprised to read just how much stuff has been given out in general (I'm not including Fanfest. Those were well publicized and distributed in an egalitarian manner). In both the previous cases and this one, the rank and file playerbase (by which I mean, those not totally obsessed with following every site, event, and thread) were completely unaware that such things were happening or could happen.
2. It seems only fair that all of the rules and conditions for "gifting" be laid out publicly. Not just for the sorts of things involved in the latest incident, but also for free fansite subscriptions, player-run PvP events, etc. If there are free accounts on the table, I want one and I need to know what it takes to get it. I'm reasonably certain that someone at CCP probably said "if we make a rule set, the min/maxers will descend on us like a plague of locusts." You're right of course, and if you read some of my comments during the recent hubbub, that's one of my chief concerns with all of this. Still, if there are goodies to be had, everyone deserves a shot at them.
3. Will someone please take the step of writing some canned language to post in "we recognize there is a problem of some sort but we can't deal with it at the moment while we investigate/return from trip/run from the volcano/sober up" situations? Having random GMs and Devs post poorly thought out responses only fuels the fire. It doesn't take much for tone of voice, word choice, or unclear writing to turn a genuinely benign post into an insult, troll, or snarky reply. This is especially true for employees who speak English as a second language (or, for that matter, many who speak it as their first). Hire a pro. If you do a post mortem on many of these [Insert Event]-gates and threadnaughts, most of the problems have arisen as a direct result of either a failure to communicate or a failure to communicate clearly. In a few cases, it almost appears that Devs are intentionally posting snarky responses. It might be funny around the office (and to me or others), but it's unprofessional to engage the playerbase on that level. All of this is almost certainly a result of gaps in your internal processes that would be filled by some sort of communications specialist at other companies. Not someone who just has two titles, but an actual specialist.
4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else? "Those guys might be scammers! CCP endorsed this one, so why go anywhere else?" That's not good for anyone but the group that was endorsed. This latest incident would pale in comparison to what will happen if the business that was endorsed actually did turn out to be a scam after CCP endorsed it. You'll never be able to hire enough staff to handle the flood of reimbursement requests. In this particular case, it also raises some potentially problematic questions: HOW could the dev know they're legitimate? If he doesn't know or can't know (and unless he has complete access to the backend, he can't), then what exactly is the basis of the endorsement?
Hope you guys had a good retreat and it leads to future awesomeness! |

Kate stark
573
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:29:00 -
[58] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:Kate stark wrote:Azami Nevinyrall wrote:There was over 100 ISW "spawned" before this whole fiasco started. Why wasn't this an issue then and why now? Not only that, but plans to release more? because the ISW was the prize for the poker tournament, hence it was announced. and the poker tournament was open to any one (i assume) and as such it was available to "everyone" and not just some one that CCP decided deserved it based on an unknown set of criteria. also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You failed to read this part... CCP Guard wrote: The first one went to the winner of the 2012 Fanfest Poker Tournament. Subsequent ones have been given to participants of various PVP tournaments, the 2013 Poker Tournament, the winner of the BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL) and most recently the staff of SOMER blink.
you're right, i did fail at reading that part. it has been a long day at work.
although, you know what separates those recipients from blink? they got it for doing something outside of their day-to-day isk making activities.
generally, this is why we need a set of criteria for who is worthy of such rewards because if blink just got it for making isk then do we also give one out for every 100th mission completed, or every 10th incursion site? also blink sponsoring in-game events is simply advertising for them. if me giving a 2 month old character a bunch of isk and in return i got a 3x multiplier on incursion site payouts i'd make sure i had an alt in all the starter zones showering them with my generosity.
don't get me wrong, i'm not saying blink don't deserve a reward for their initiative however when listed against other recipients of IWS they do seem to have got it for a different reason (hence the need for guidelines).
in fact; i doubt anyone in this thread would say blink don't deserve recognition and reward for their initiative. however i bet that many wouldn't agree that this was the correct way to do it. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1935
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:30:00 -
[59] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system?
Hard to abuse a system which isn't automatic. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Livonia Velorea
Banana Corp
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill - Press pass to Prometheus Station opening - Assassination Contract: Mirial - Premier ticket for: The last G campaign - Premier ticket for: Clear Skies - Premier ticket for: Day of Darkness
as mentioned http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/time-capsule-full-of-memorabilia/ here.
Whatever is decided, i'd avoid binding items to accounts ect and the out of game stuff should be just that. T-shirts and other swag. |
|

Kate stark
573
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:31:00 -
[61] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well.
That's all you had to say. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
395
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things. The problem is this reeks of 'Greed is Good' at the moment and the secret nature in which SOMER wanted it handled only makes it seem that much worse. I haven't heard of SOMER helping anyone in game. I don't gamble with them so maybe I'm in the dark here but the only service I see that they provide is taking peoples ISK through gambling and the only reason they got a reward from CCP is that they help sell plexes. A SOMER Director is a regular at a Monthly EVE meet I help with. He donated tens of billions in prizes in August. And gave 250 Mil to everyone in attendance last Christmas... Now you have heard of SOMER helping people when they didn't really need to, but wanted to!
News to me. I can see why maybe they were in need of some recognition. Good to know this after the fact. Not today spaghetti. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:33:00 -
[63] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system? Hard to abuse a system which isn't automatic. This is EVE. A way will be found. |

Chris Winter
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
243
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:34:00 -
[64] - Quote
The two aspects of this that bug me are: - It was not announced at the time. This makes it seem sketchy, especially since the value of the IWS in player eyes is based on how many there are. - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
When I kill sleepers and sell their delicious gooey insides, that's my "normal operations" and I make plenty of ISK doing it.
So why exactly are they getting rewarded any more than me? It's not like they're providing a community service for free the way E-UNI or Chribba or any number of other people are.
I would be totally okay with stuff, even in-game stuff, being given to people who donate their time for the benefit of the whole community, as long as it's given out in the open.
But giving stuff to people who have as their primary goal making money off the stupidity of other EVE players? Yeah, no. That's basically saying, "Here. You're so awesome at making money that we're going to give you EVEN MORE money." |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4258

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:35:00 -
[65] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless.
This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Zeus Maximo
Mentally Assured Destruction
476
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
Almost equivalent to the United States Government rewarding Wal-Mart with some of the worlds rarest diamonds because they "helped" the economy out. I can see why CCP wants to reward people that take ISK out of the game but damn.... Shouldn't goonswarm be rewarded because they keep so many people interested? Or TEST because they are great at destroying a ships supply when they go out on a roam.
CCP should take a histroy lesson from every country on earth. People that help the economy do not get RARE good for free, they get benefits that help them continue their business model. Prime examples are tax breaks and special zoning.
You don't help someone out but GIVING them something for FREE. You make their job easier to make a profit so they can in return help you! Allow these third parties freedom when it comes to coding so the processes can become more automatic or a special delivery service that spawns the ship in their hangar instead of jita. This would businesses in eve something to strive for.
As we speak SOMER could keep all of the ships to himself and set the code to make sure nobody wins. When you let someone in your back pocket CCP they will take every dollar you have. Don't give too much...... |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:36:00 -
[67] - Quote
Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Gougeres
Bearded Dawn Silent Infinity
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:37:00 -
[68] - Quote
SomerBlink provides additional revenue for CCP, that's about it (Besides donating a few in game items to certain events).
What positive impact has SomerBlink had on the Eve community that they would be deserving of rewards? Do they create game content? Do they run useful websites (Evefiles, Dotlan, blogs)?
Anything SomerBlink does is a direct result of the players that use their ISK to play SomerBlink. Giving in game items back to the community is not, in my opinion of any net benefit to the Eve Community.
Instead of rewarding someone for creating a website that takes something from players, CCP should reward those who aren't asking for ISK, but provide useful, thoughtful additions to the game. |

DJ FunkyBacon
Eve Radio Corporation
165
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:38:00 -
[69] - Quote
http://funkybacon.blogspot.com/2013/10/learning-from-past-and-moving-forward.html
My thoughts moving forward. I know some of you in Reykjavik have already seen it, but wanted to make sure I included it in your thread here too. Thanks you guys for pausing to put some thought into this. |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:38:00 -
[70] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS? For starters, you can't undock in a piece of Steve.*
*possibly something I would like to see in the next expansion |
|

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:38:00 -
[71] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS?
depends entirely upon if they're transferable or not. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5219
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:39:00 -
[72] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things. The Vegas thing makes sense (though I think it was still a poor decision to reward a for-profit site and that shouldn't be repeated - sponsorships don't really change that because they're advertisements for SOMER). I think the immense value of the prizes - and that you could only get a reasonable shot at them by giving SOMER gigantic piles of money - was really poorly thought out. It'd have been one thing to let SOMER sponsor and host it or something, but tying the tickets themselves to giving SOMER money was...not good. |

Takari
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:39:00 -
[73] - Quote
If the ISW Scorpion was created specifically as an item to be spawned and given away, that should be in its "Show Info" box. If people still want to spend tons of money on them, that's their own fault.
Still I support the creation of and giving away of a ship whose sole purpose was to be created and given away just as long as everyone knows or can easily know that this is the case. "Roll the dice, don't think twice. This is the way of things.
Welcome to EVE." ~ CCP Falcon |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2484
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:41:00 -
[74] - Quote
A few questions, if you will:
Quote:Recently CCP rewarded the staff members of SOMER Blink, the highly popular micro lottery website, with Ishukone Watch Scorpions (IWS) as a thank-you for their contributions to EVE.
To be clear first of all, what are SOMER's "contributions to Eve", exactly? They run a successful and profitable in-game business and they invest some of their profits into sponsorship of other in-game events. In that respect, they seem little different from a Jita alt playing the 0.01 ISK game to fund a lowsec PvPer's main, or Goonswarm's OTEC profits being used to bankroll Burn Jita.
Essentially what I'm asking here is: How is CCP defining and quantifying a specific organisation as making "contributions"?
Quote:In its very essence, the IWS is a skin with its own GÇ£show infoGÇ¥ description. But while thatGÇÖs certainly an important thing to realize, we of course recognize that rare items you can sell on TQ will be coveted and will have some value through the law of supply and demand despite a lack of base value or actual functionality.
In a way, something like the Ishukone Scorpion is pretty much the worst item you could use for this purpose. As a ship to undock and fly around in, it's A Bit Rubbish (having the pre-buff Scorpion statline) and Scorpions aren't exactly elitist prestige items to begin with (though they can be useful support ships in a large fleet fight), its a bulky item which is hard to move around, and it is unobtainable through conventional means. Essentially, they'll never be undocked and the only value they have as a gift is the fact you can sell it to collectors in exchange for a massive pile of ISK (in a perverse way, it would actually have been better if you'd handed out something like a bunch of Alliance Tourney prize frigates, since at least they might have been used to create some content in the form of hilarious lossmails).
Quote:Why hasnGÇÖt my favorite fansite or community enterprise received something nice too?
ThereGÇÖs no single answer to that question. Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or theyGÇÖve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, CollectorGÇÖs editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc. Have Internal Affairs and/or the CSM been at all involved in the decision making process for these giveaways previously? I find it hard to comprehend the idea that CCP spawns in-game valuables for a selected group of players and nobody stops to consider the historical baggage associated with such an action.
Quote: Now on to the personal reward
The IWS is a cool thing to have and thatGÇÖs why we use it as a reward, not because it carries X ISK value. The price people negotiate is wholly decided between individuals and is hard for us to predict with any precision. The problem there is that whilst a limited ship is quite a cool thing to have, its arguably less cool a thing to have than the 15 billion ISK or so they were selling for. They're not very 'show-off-able', even if the character in question can fly a Caldari Battleship there's no reason to ever undock in one so it seems inevitable the end result of them being handed out to a select group is that they'll largely end up being sold to collectors to gather dust in a hangar.
Quote:We recognize that gifting rare in-game items of potential ISK value proactively to select third-parties, whether as prizes for them to hand out or as a personal thank-you, can have implications no matter how well-meaning you are. We realize that for example in the IWS reward situation, a line was crossed in many peopleGÇÖs minds despite there being certain similarities with previous gifting events. Where the line of acceptability lies is something we need to work out together before we move forward. You have barely touched here on the items given to SOMER as lottery prizes, which in my mind at least is the larger problem in this whole incident. Gifting these lottery prizes as well as the large amount of publicity that accompanied it, had an inevitable effect on the popularity of SOMER's business whilst these prizes were available, inevitably at the expense of other rival lottery organisations. In effect CCP decided to choose winners and losers within the community of lottery organisations, which is of great concern for those of us wishing to maintain the integrity of the sandbox.
The latest statement you have provided is a welcome start, but questions remain. CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5219
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:41:00 -
[75] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Yeah, this was a serious, serious problem as well. There should not have been a CCP endorsement that SOMER is not a scam and has operated completely honestly for its entire history. I don't actually believe the research to verify that was done, but it was wrong even if it was. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:41:00 -
[76] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote: - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
The "Bring Solo Back" podcast got ISK and ships for doing PvP and talking about it. They made profit.
It's hard to draw a line with those community projects. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Leigh Akiga
State War Academy Caldari State
232
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:41:00 -
[77] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam
The largest and most successful scams always appear to be.... not a scam
|

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:42:00 -
[78] - Quote
Takari wrote:If the ISW Scorpion was created specifically as an item to be spawned and given away, that should be in its "Show Info" box. If people still want to spend tons of money on them, that's their own fault.
Still I support the creation of and giving away of a ship whose sole purpose was to be created and given away just as long as everyone knows or can easily know that this is the case. i would be ok with this too. and if/when you do decide to resume giving stuff out, please please please have it be a new ship that is announced for that purpose beforehand. leave the amount of ISW in-game as is  |
|

Chribba
Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire
9804
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:43:00 -
[79] - Quote
Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. This pretty much exactly, the reward of being recognized and in a way immortalized with the items you have, or monuments, or even names of planets etc is one of the best ways to show appreciation.
Things like that would be worth so much more in terms of memories and feeling accomplishment than a regular item you sell for some ISK. I've been joking since years that my personal ultimate goal would be to have a planet named after me, and I'm sure that alot of people who dedicate themselves making things to try and improve and build the community (not for profit only) would feel very rewarded by things like that.
/c
|
|
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4261

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:44:00 -
[80] - Quote
Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:thanks for the dev blog, so far I'm liking what I read. the recent events had me quite alarmed and i did not renew the first round of my accounts that expired, awaiting CCP response first.
so, with the rewards program currently suspended and being looked at again in light of current happenings, i take it that the number of scorpion ishukone watch present in game now will remain stable and any new giveaways will be using new prizes, which are hopefully out of game or non-transferable? as some others mentioned prior, even some plex wouldn't be bad, as those can also be used for stuff like subscription or re-sculpts. just please, no more rare items!
That's what we're pausing until we have a better system the community feels better about; All selective give-aways of rare in-game items. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1349
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:45:00 -
[81] - Quote
Thank you so much ccp I really appreciate your response. I will leave it with this quote: "always remember that the road to hell is paved with good intentions". There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:45:00 -
[82] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong?
Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:46:00 -
[83] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
The "Bring Solo Back" podcast got ISK and ships for doing PvP and talking about it. They made profit. It's hard to draw a line with those community projects. I'll draw some lines for you:
Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. Don't take actions that directly increase the profits of an existing enterprise (e.g. don't tie item giveaways to Blink usage). Giving out plexes to media people is ok.
Not that hard really. |

Laserak
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:46:00 -
[84] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Yeah, this was a serious, serious problem as well. There should not have been a CCP endorsement that SOMER is not a scam and has operated completely honestly for its entire history. I don't actually believe the research to verify that was done, but it was wrong even if it was.
So if Sommerset Mahm ever or anyone with the roles over there decides to cash in their chips, quit EVE and take Blink for everything they can does that mean that any customer losses would be reimbursed by CCP since the good behavior of Blink has been guaranteed by CCP?
|

Aurthes
M. Corp Engineering Fatal Ascension
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:47:00 -
[85] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:ShadowandLight wrote:Here's the million dollar question
what else has CCP secretly given out to pilots, communities, player run organizations?
Secretly...nothing. And what we've given out as rewards or prizes doesn't generally come in big bundles which is one of the key reasons eyebrows were raised over this incident. It's worth keeping in mind that Internal Affairs has complete oversight over every single item spawned or transferred on our server and monitors all staff account activity closely as is their purpose.
I think a problem with IA is that while they may work to make sure that individual developers (and I guess GMs) don't do anything for their personal benefit, they aren't a counter to CCP itself enriching/favoring one set of players over another.
You would think that maybe the CSM could assist with this, but the CSM seems to only be called in after the screw-up is in effect. (and even then, some CSM members are just shills)
|

Chris Winter
Zephyr Corp V.A.S.T.
245
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:47:00 -
[86] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
The "Bring Solo Back" podcast got ISK and ships for doing PvP and talking about it. They made profit. It's hard to draw a line with those community projects. Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1350
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:47:00 -
[87] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. This pretty much exactly, the reward of being recognized and in a way immortalized with the items you have, or monuments, or even names of planets etc is one of the best ways to show appreciation. Things like that would be worth so much more in terms of memories and feeling accomplishment than a regular item you sell for some ISK. I've been joking since years that my personal ultimate goal would be to have a planet named after me, and I'm sure that alot of people who dedicate themselves making things to try and improve and build the community (not for profit only) would feel very rewarded by things like that. /c Are all the planets in the ammar system named? If not name one after cribbs... I mean dust bunnies got to name a planet There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

BigCountry
Specter Syndicate Tactical Narcotics Team
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:48:00 -
[88] - Quote
First off , Somer Blink didnt get these ships, the individuals who work for SB did ... that doesnt mean that is ISK in SB pocket..
Second .. they do contribute to the EVE community by backing almost every single contest or competition that people do..
Third.. I like the idea that CCP gives away something cool , even an ingame item... somethign not everyone has.. No where does it say CCP is obligated to maintain the value of "rare" items.. especially for an item they previously stated for an item that would be gifted to people as thank you items...
Fourth ... Haters and Cry Babbies , most people wanna cry about how much somer makes, what about the cost of running their site?? what about allll the free stuff they give away not only on their site , but to other people who run events and what not ... SB makes the money they do , cuz they are smart and found a way to make money, while letting people gamble and basicly get ships for less then they could ingame, with a chance... |

Kuda Timberline
Not Quite Stable
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:49:00 -
[89] - Quote
Well, for all those jumping up and down screaming like a 2yr old "IT ISN'T FAIR" ...seems you got what you wanted.
Quote:For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors.
...and this is why "we" can't have nice things.
"We" being folks who spend extra time to create content for this community. I don't see this game going far if people stop engaging and just start sitting in station ship spinning.
|

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
1257
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:49:00 -
[90] - Quote
I'm glad this lead to a response and a change of policy. I'm still bitter about the spawned scorpions still existing.
As far as further rewards: Stick to out of game items, promotions on your website, perhaps gametime (added directly to account, NOT PLEXes).
Character- or account-bound cosmetic items are okay, as long as such mechanism exists. Also they need to be destroyed when the character is sold. |
|

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[91] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4263

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[92] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system?
Not unless we design a bad system :).
But seriously, that's not going to be a problem. We're not novices when it comes to providing incentives. We've had a fansite program since forever that rewards registered fansites that meet our standards with free accounts and we've gotten pretty good at knowing what constitutes a worthy contribution there. Also just so it's clear we don't award straight ISK. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:51:00 -
[93] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
The "Bring Solo Back" podcast got ISK and ships for doing PvP and talking about it. They made profit. It's hard to draw a line with those community projects. I'll draw some lines for you:Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. Don't take actions that directly increase the profits of an existing enterprise (e.g. don't tie item giveaways to Blink usage). Giving out plexes to media people is ok. Not that hard really. I was talking about the line between for profit and non profit player events/communities/websites/whatever.
If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Bjurn Akely
Knights of Nii The 20 Minuters
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:52:00 -
[94] - Quote
I think regarding why/how/to who and what-not others have said all I want to point out. Regarding how this whole thing came to be two things come into my mind:
- You guys at CCP is pretty good at coming forward with acknowledging problems and/or discussing them in a pretty open way. Kudos for that.
- You guys continue to make mistakes that almost anyone with any sort of media training or background can tell you "this will backfire when it comes out". This is a weakness CCP have. Do you have people that are working with such things (much like the most awesome Dr. EyjoG is regarding the economy)?
|

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:53:00 -
[95] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion.
i was under the impression they catered to separate niches, and i'm unaware of any group that fills the same niche as RvB at all. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kalindra Chan
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:53:00 -
[96] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote:The two aspects of this that bug me are: - It was not announced at the time. This makes it seem sketchy, especially since the value of the IWS in player eyes is based on how many there are. - It was given to a for-profit enterprise. SB is a for-profit website. They make plenty of ISK doing their normal operations.
When I kill sleepers and sell their delicious gooey insides, that's my "normal operations" and I make plenty of ISK doing it.
So why exactly are they getting rewarded any more than me? It's not like they're providing a community service for free the way E-UNI or Chribba or any number of other people are.
I would be totally okay with stuff, even in-game stuff, being given to people who donate their time for the benefit of the whole community, as long as it's given out in the open.
But giving stuff to people who have as their primary goal making money off the stupidity of other EVE players? Yeah, no. That's basically saying, "Here. You're so awesome at making money that we're going to give you EVEN MORE money." exactly this! I'm a trap! |

Livonia Velorea
Banana Corp
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:55:00 -
[97] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS?
They have the same essence in that they are both a vanity item but you can't fly them for a start, they have less demand, they hold more sentimental and intrinsic value to the recipient, they offer near no discernible gameplay, they are a more appropriate reward. (in my opinion atleast)
Would it not be a bigger reward by CCP and the community as a whole if you were imortalised in the game you love by an ingame trinket, than a simple ship that alot of people get? Perhaps it's not practile or more likely it's reserved for more unique and rarer circumtances but I still thing something of this nature would be more fitting. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2654
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:56:00 -
[98] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:That's what we're pausing until we have a better system the community feels better about; All selective give-aways of rare in-game items. Um... well isn't that the core of the problem? Making them rare is inherently going to make them extremely valuable. Selectively giving them away is favoritism.
Doesn't anybody notice this? I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:56:00 -
[99] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple.
If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap.
Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:57:00 -
[100] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Do you also think that giving Red Vs. Blue advertisement was wrong? Competitors like E-Uni will have harder time. A reasonable question, but I don't know anything about this, and so will not tender an opinion.
Interesting angle actually. Because even when we design a more transparent system around this, it's not ever going to make everyone completely content all the time. But we'll always try to be as fair as we can. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:59:00 -
[101] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:We recognize that gifting rare in-game items of potential ISK value proactively to select third-parties, whether as prizes for them to hand out or as a personal thank-you, can have implications no matter how well-meaning you are. We realize that for example in the IWS reward situation, a line was crossed in many peopleGÇÖs minds despite there being certain similarities with previous gifting events. Where the line of acceptability lies is something we need to work out together before we move forward. Sounds good. And yes, of course the value of the in-game things you hand out matters. In principle the same arguments apply to gifts of lesser value, but if the value is perceived as insignificant then nobody will really bother much.
Quote:Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly? Answering all those questions in order:
- Out-of-game things are IMO the least problematic gifts so I think they should be preferred as give-aways.
- Non-transferable in-game items are absolutely acceptable too if 2 conditions are met: They are truly non-transferable, e.g. just taking the IshuScorp off market and contracts would not be enough, the thing would really need to be "character-bound" or something the character doesn't even own like a monument. And the second condition is it can't have significant in-game use. I feel a soulbound IshuScorp would be comparatively useless enough to still be ok, a soulbound capital ship or T3 would already cross the line. Obviously this is a matter of personal opinion what constitutes useless. Generally speaking the more cosmetic and the less useable the better as far as in-game stuff is concerned.
- I see no compelling reason to entirely stop handing out personal rewards, as long as you take extra care of the sandbox's integrity when you do so. Btw, giving a little in-game goodie to everyone showing up at a RL meeting is OK in my book, it's close enough to "available to everyone" so I don't consider it favouritism. And prizes for tournaments and similar events that are available to everyone and which have clear rules are OK too of course.
- I think handing out rewards in bulk so early receivers can't cash out doesn't really solve any of the core issues. If you stick to either out-of-game or "useless", "worthless" in-game stuff then this point is a non-issue anyway.
- IMO if you stick to out-of-game and "useless", "worthless" in-game stuff a list isn't strictly needed, though it would certainly be a good thing to have even in this case cause transparency generally is a great thing and builds trust. For non-useless or non-worthless in-game stuff a public list is a necessity IMO, but as I said you shouldn't hand out these kinds of items as personal rewards in the first place.
|

Vahl Ahashion
Risk Breakers Fidelas Constans
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 19:59:00 -
[102] - Quote
In general I don't see any problem with handing out rewards providing its in the open which was the only problem I really had with what happened. That said CCP should ask themselves whether a for profit organisation which makes as much isk as Somer is the kind of organisation most deserving of receiving gifts. |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[103] - Quote
Chris Winter wrote: Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing.
Gambling is also for entertainment :D If not that then for what? The podcast had advertisment (for SOMER Blink, hehe), that means the listeners were the product. If you want to take part in a Tournament you also need to have an active account.
Do ISK doublers (the scammers) give out billions of ISK for ingame events? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[104] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position.
the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kinis Deren
The Nyan Cat Pirates Disband.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:00:00 -
[105] - Quote
I had no problem with the issue of the IWScorps since they conferred the recipients with no in game advantage (gold ammo style). I feel that the ISK value arguement is weak, since the value is based upon unfounded speculation on how rare those ships will remain.
I would urge CCP to continue to reward individual players, or organizations, as they see fit and with the appropriate oversight. I would suggest that any community reward is published to curtail any malicious suggestions of secrecy. |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:01:00 -
[106] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing.
Gambling is also for entertainment :D If not that then for what? The podcast had advertisment (for SOMER Blink, hehe), that means the listeners were the product. If you want to take part in a Tournament you also need to have an active account. Do ISK doublers (the scammers) give out billions of ISK for ingame events?
if it meant more people gave them isk to double, of course they would. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Plug in Baby
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:01:00 -
[107] - Quote
Thanks for the reponse, although not entirely sure why you bothered thanking the CSM, if their role had any value surely they would have been consulted beforehand.
Just an additional question that has come out of this, apologies if this is off-topic but it seems that any thread with the word Somer in it should be kept to one thread at the moment.
Are Somers GTC selling activities acceptable with regard to the EULA?
I.e. provided I set up a website:
A) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK for $5 profit
B) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK value of lottery tokens for $5 profit
C) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK for $200 profit
D) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK value of lottery tokens for $200 profit
within the EULA? This is not a forum alt, this is a forum main. |

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:02:00 -
[108] - Quote
Character-binding things is very much not in the spirit of EVE, and I don't think that should ever happen.
Things like the trading cards and other random items that aren't ships never seem to draw the level of ISK that a rare ship would. That might be an area for you to look at.
I still think WiS would offer great opportunities for more reward-type things. Heck, awards you could stick on your CQ walls. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:03:00 -
[109] - Quote
I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

K0ttDiledundee
Pwn 'N Play Nulli Secunda
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[110] - Quote
What about those of us who have played for many many years without breaks in our subscription.........where's our special rare items? We've spent years generating real content in the form of battles and participation in your game and we dont even get a thanjs. All sb does is rake in isk through controling a lottery with stacked odds in favor of fake/alt characters. And now they've been given even more isk. Sad ccp just sad. And what on earth is this rubicon "expansion" theres nothing new except two ships and some balancing....oh and bastion mode.................this "expansion" looks a lot like incarna. No expanding just a couple bells and whistles. Way to shoot yourself in the foot twice in about a week |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[111] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote: If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap.
Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event. It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position.
That is what I seriously don't get.
The ship is not better in any other way, it's just like a golden monocle thats locked in a station somewhere. It does not give you any ingame benefit, even if they decide to undock it, no? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:04:00 -
[112] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Meh, the market for monocles and thousand dollar jeans is not that large and saturates far more readily. If that wasn't the case, we'd have seen far, far greater development of incarna/WiS by now.
No one would have batted an eye if CCP gave Somer 20 monocles instead of 20 IWS. |

Kate stark
575
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:05:00 -
[113] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4266

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:06:00 -
[114] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person.
 CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
2139
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:06:00 -
[115] - Quote
I personally don't care about this whole Somer Blink issue, I think it has been overblown, but I do have reservations about spawning in-game items as rewards.
If CCP really wants to spawn in-game items as rewards, then the items must be non-transferable, and there needs to be transparency about the award. Not just for auditing purposes, but because as an EVE player I want to know who is doing what for the EVE community. I'd love to see a site showing all the IWS people with a brief description of what the award was for! I'm amazed that so many community heroes may not be getting any recognition beyond the reward.
I also dislike limited editions of anything, example: tournament ships, Quafe fanfest shirts, etc.
What I do approve of, and think is incredibly cool, are things like the Jita & Amarr monuments with names forever emblazoned on them, even after the events are long forgotten. I was disappointed to see those removed after the Incarna riots. I could imagine a CONCORD system set aside for just such a NCO museum. |

Erica Sukarala
Rokh You like a Hurricane Nomads.
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:08:00 -
[116] - Quote
Everyone should be happy about CCP giving away this ship as a prize. All it does is put a little money in someone's pocket. What are they going to do with it? Spend it on ships and modules that are going to get blown up. If you have a problem with this system, you should have a problem with the PLEX to ISK exchange, since anyone can just spend IRL to be space rich.
Every bit matters. |

Kate stark
576
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:08:00 -
[117] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:l0rd carlos wrote: If you say items you can't undock, do you also mean not tradable? Or why does the undocking part matter? And 1B ISK ship has the same value as a 1B monocle, no?
We needed a line in the sand. I provided it. Just that simple. If people want to put monocles on their furries, I don't give a crap. If people want special unique ships in a spaceships sandbox, I give a crap. Hence the line in the sand; Don't give out anything that can undock unless it's a part of a CCP organized event.It's up to the community at large if they agree with this position. the market is still part of the sandbox, unless the item is nontransferable the issue persists regardless of whether it can undock or not. Meh, the market for monocles and thousand dollar jeans is not that large and saturates far more readily. If that wasn't the case, we'd have seen far, far greater development of incarna/WiS by now. No one would have batted an eye if CCP gave Somer 20 monocles instead of 20 IWS. "as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox" is a bad justification. either the rewards should affect the sandbox, or they shouldn't.
nobody massively cared that they got scorpions, the fact that CCP seem to be showering blink with benevolence and half of which was done in secret is what made eyelids bat. mostly the combination, individually i doubt either would have stirred up much interest either.
Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:14:00 -
[118] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: "as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox" is a bad justification. either the rewards should affect the sandbox, or they shouldn't.
nobody massively cared that they got scorpions, the fact that CCP seem to be showering blink with benevolence and half of which was done in secret is what made eyelids bat. mostly the combination, individually i doubt either would have stirred up much interest either.
Favoritism was/is absolutely an issue. When CCP tied the chance of getting a gold magnate or w/e to Blink participation, that is a line that should never have been crossed. Personally, I would like all giveaways (excluding CCP run events like the alliance tournaments) to be limited to plex or subscription time.
But, CCP clearly wants to expand their giveaway program. Fine. I'm providing sample guidelines for that expansion.
"as long as it doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox"
Spaceships are a pretty big corner of the spaceships sandbox. Monocles for furries isn't, otherwise we'd have full fledged WiS by now. |

Cyrane Aurorea
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:16:00 -
[119] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. We want to carefully consider your feedback and determine what our framework should be and what improvements to the level of transparency are needed so that the rewards program serves its intended purpose of making the EVE Universe a better place.
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
I honestly feel this is a ridicilous decision.
It's really sad to see that cool things CCP does are now impossible due to a jealous, whining and selfish community that can't accept another player receiving special recognition from CCP and the rewards associated with that.
If anything CCP should increase its contribution to people, websites and initiatives that offer a certain (unique) service to the community, to further incentivize these.
These giveaways do not negatively impact me personally, nor do I feel that they negatively impact the EVE universe. I actually feel that the people that have received something from CCP so far have more than deserved it, and have, in most cases, enriched my experience in the game through their community contributions.
The only critique that may be deserved here is that there could be some more transparancy on the matter. An example to make it more transparant could be the following; a publication in the EVE newsletter detailing ''player abc'' has received a special reward from CCP for his/her contribution to the game, with details of what this reward is, and what contribution was deserving of such a reward (e.g. special event organized in the game).
Anyway I would hope that CCP reconsiders its stance on this subject and resumes its reward program in the near future. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
47
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:16:00 -
[120] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person. CCP should not endorse pizza toppings. It isn't fair to the other toppings. |
|

Kate stark
577
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:17:00 -
[121] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Spaceships are a pretty big corner of the spaceships sandbox. Monocles for furries isn't, otherwise we'd have full fledged WiS by now.
and spaceships can be purchased with the isk furries will pay for the monocles. as i said, it either affects the sandbox, or it doesn't. that's basically why it's still an issue with the scorpions even though they're crap and refine to 1 trit. you can sell them and fund an entire fleet of ships.
a whole fleet of ships certainly affects the sandbox. an extra fleet could be the tipping point for an otherwise evenly matched fight.
but whatever, we're straying from the point here. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Morphisat
Millard Innovation Inc The 20 Minuters
32
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:17:00 -
[122] - Quote
This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
47
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:17:00 -
[123] - Quote
Tau Cabalander wrote:I was disappointed to see those removed after the Incarna riots. I could imagine a CONCORD system set aside for just such a NCO museum. They put it back to the old monument a while back. |

Gougeres
Bearded Dawn Silent Infinity
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:19:00 -
[124] - Quote
Cyrane Aurorea wrote:
I actually feel that the people that have received something from CCP so far have more than deserved it, and have, in most cases, enriched my experience in the game through their community contributions.
I am genuinely curious as to what SomerBlink has done to 'Enrich your experience in the game' ? |

Grarr Dexx
Snuff Box
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:19:00 -
[125] - Quote
Why Blink? Why not Dotlan, why not EVE-Files, why not anything else that actually provides a service not with the intent of just making mad dough? |

Tinman Spectacular
EVE University Ivy League
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:20:00 -
[126] - Quote
Some people have already mentioned this idea, and it's been done before. Immortalize individuals and corporations with permanent relics and monuments in-game as reward for their community contributions. You like what Somer is doing, why not a "Somer Gambling Hall" off Dodixie Fed Navy? You want to give credit to their members, let people warp to it and buy junk items like "1 blink credit - issued by [somer employee]." Like someone said, it's no different than "piece of steve," etc.
Even better, let them name their junk item with your final approval. CCP gets an ISK sink. Somer employees get a very VERY special in-game achievement, and players get something to do other than buy a passport from Poitat. This would be an achievement most of us will never accomplish because of what they've done for the community, respect or hate it, their name will be remembered even after they unsub and nobody gets a tangible ISK advantage over anyone either directly or indirectly. I get that a couple billion ISK to outfits like Somer is just a rounding error, but it's still an in-game advantage. I also get ships and junk have been given before, so what? Things change in this game.
-RvB gets some magical kill number in their eternal war, how about a flaming statue named after the pilot who died or something? -Some event attracts 10k people in local with super duper reinforced nodes, maybe they'll get a station named after them in that system? -How about an item for sale at SOE stations called "A Map of Eve - by Dotlan"?
It's not that hard.
Nobody will have a problem with this. The player is immortalized and the community gets FREE content; free as in I'm not paying $14/mo for in-game corps to get marketable items which benefit them in some tangible, non-existential manner, that may or may not be used against me.
For comparison, for most players their corporate titles and medals are more meaningful and treasured than ISK gifts and their equivalencies (rare items and such). Usually you get them for spectacular in-game feats, or spectacular in-game failures. It's hard to say which kind is more regarded by the individual they were conferred upon  |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2656
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:24:00 -
[127] - Quote
A Research Alt wrote:Quote:Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? You shouldn't be giving out cash rewards in the first place. The Devs get a cash reward for building the game. The web designer got a cash reward for building this forum. WTF is the difference if they want to pay people cash for building a community site? Putting up something ridiculous like this robs any of your other arguments of credibility. If your objective is to sway your audience, you should focus on the points most important to you.
/my2isk
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Frying Doom
2579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:24:00 -
[128] - Quote
Personally I would like the rewards to be out of game.
But the biggest thing is for CCP to be transparent in these types of things, it looks dodgy when these kinds of things are hidden. You might not have meant for these to be kept a secret but you did not announce them your selves so that makes it just as responsible.
Also some customer service training for some ISDs wouldn't go astray. Closing a threadnaught and directing it to two different topics just showed us that they didn't have a clue. That just made it look like CCP where deliberately trying to shut down the communication on this issue by burying it in other topics.
As to the CSM some have shown (elsewhere) that they were pissed with the rest of us and others showed why the CSM needs the ability to recall members by the community because they had no clue what was going on. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
364
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:24:00 -
[129] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
and spaceships can be purchased with the isk furries will pay for the monocles. as i said, it either affects the sandbox, or it doesn't.
But by that logic, so does purchasing plex. You can buy titans and fleets with plex, and people have done so in the past. CCP has been giving out plex/subscription time to media people for years.
The fact is, unique ships are an order of magnitude more significant than various clothing items and plex. Giving out, 20 or 30 unique ships while endorsing someone's for-profit business by tying unique handout rewards to patronage of that business?
That's a great deal more significant than a dozen monocles. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3800
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:26:00 -
[130] - Quote
Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships.
This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

Kate stark
578
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:27:00 -
[131] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:
and spaceships can be purchased with the isk furries will pay for the monocles. as i said, it either affects the sandbox, or it doesn't.
But by that logic, so does purchasing plex. You can buy titans and fleets with plex, and people have done so in the past. CCP has been giving out plex/subscription time to media people for years. The fact is, unique ships are an order of magnitude more significant than various clothing items and plex. Giving out, 20 or 30 unique ships while endorsing someone's for-profit business by tying unique handout rewards to patronage of that business? That's a great deal more significant than a dozen monocles.
1) plex isn't restricted with regard to who gets it. 2) plex aren't free handouts from ccp. (and those that are, i would wager are from banned accounts. it's fact that ccp take plex from banned accounts)
two very important differences. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:31:00 -
[132] - Quote
What I forgot in my earlier post: You generally have to be very careful about rewarding in-game for-profit organizations. Even an endorsement from your side is potentially hurting their competitors. The nice thing here is, if an organization is run for-profit and is successful enough to catch your attention it probably doesn't need your support anyway.
Non-profit organizations might need the support and they don't have competition that icould be distorted by supporting them.
iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. Of course people owning PLEX would suffer devaluation. When you increase the supply the price decreases, it's no different for PLEX than for any other item in the game. Therefore PLEX are just as bad an idea. The only difference is that a single PLEX is worth considerably less than a single IshuScorp at the moment. But if they handed out 20b in PLEX to everyone it would be just as bad.
Synthetic Cultist wrote:Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist.
Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. No, those items (if new ones were created for the reward program) would be rare and tradeable and therefore would have significant ingame value just as the IshuScorps. There would be no significant difference, cause nobody is against the IshuScorps for their very limited combat value, but because of their considerable ISK value.
|

Cyrane Aurorea
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:32:00 -
[133] - Quote
Gougeres wrote:Cyrane Aurorea wrote:
I actually feel that the people that have received something from CCP so far have more than deserved it, and have, in most cases, enriched my experience in the game through their community contributions.
I am genuinely curious as to what SomerBlink has done to 'Enrich your experience in the game' ?
My post wasn't specifically aimed at SomerBlink, as stopping the giveaway program affects everyone, not just that specific organization.
But to answer your question, SomerBlink has sponsored many other organizations, corporations and individual players in the game, financially and through ships.
Some examples of sponsoring; - Sponsoring Kil2 (now knows as CCP Rise) - Sponsoring the New Eden Open tournament teams - Sponsoring Alliance tournament participants - etc..
I think that for a large amount of playerbase the aforementioned have enriched their game experience due to the events and content being created for everyone to enjoy and even for non-EVE players to enjoy and create awareness for the game.
Apart from that they have also created a successful and interesting gambling game which many people in EVE enjoy playing.
At the very least they have allowed for a more diverse, active and vibrant EVE community to thrive through their contributions. Obviously SomerBlink is not the only entity that makes this possible, and other similar ones should also be shown appreciation by CCP too, but as you mentioned them specifically I used them as an example. |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:35:00 -
[134] - Quote
Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

PotatoOverdose
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
365
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:35:00 -
[135] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
1) plex isn't restricted to who gets it. 2) plex aren't free handouts from ccp.
two very important differences.
2) They are to certain media organizers and community sites, and have been on numerous occasions for quite some time.
Look, we can say "no CCP involvement in helping fan sites," but that would probably end up being a net-negative. These giveaways can have a net-positive effect, when given to the right communities/events.
But the magnitude of the reward should be kept in check. No one would care if Somer got 20 exotic dancers in-game from CCP. Everyone apparently cared when Somer was to get even a single Gold Magnate (enough for CCP to take that one of the table REAL quick).
Clearly, the magnitude of the reward is something that should be kept in check. |

Gougeres
Bearded Dawn Silent Infinity
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:37:00 -
[136] - Quote
Cyrane Aurorea wrote:Gougeres wrote:Cyrane Aurorea wrote:
I actually feel that the people that have received something from CCP so far have more than deserved it, and have, in most cases, enriched my experience in the game through their community contributions.
I am genuinely curious as to what SomerBlink has done to 'Enrich your experience in the game' ? My post wasn't specifically aimed at SomerBlink, as stopping the giveaway program affects everyone, not just that specific organization. But to answer your question, SomerBlink has sponsored many other organizations, corporations and individual players in the game, financially and through ships. Some examples of sponsoring; - Sponsoring Kil2 (now knows as CCP Rise) - Sponsoring the New Eden Open tournament teams - Sponsoring Alliance tournament participants - etc.. I think that for a large amount of playerbase the aforementioned have enriched their game experience due to the events and content being created for everyone to enjoy and even for non-EVE players to enjoy and create awareness for the game. Apart from that they have also created a successful and interesting gambling game which many people in EVE enjoy playing. At the very least they have allowed for a more diverse, active and vibrant EVE community to thrive through their contributions. Obviously SomerBlink is not the only entity that makes this possible, and other similar ones should also be shown appreciation by CCP too, but as you mentioned them specifically I used them as an example.
Well, I would disagree with some of what you have said, since it's the players that donate ISK to Somer that result in the sponsoring of events you noted, but I appreciate your reply.
|

Kate stark
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:37:00 -
[137] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
do they not have alarm clocks in your timezone?
with all due respect, if you wanted them you'd log in and try and get them. if you chose not to participate; that's on you really. just like if you never turned up to whatever event it was they were giving away the noobships then you didn't have a right to moan about that one either. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Riyal
Fluffles Inc. xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
138
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:40:00 -
[138] - Quote
Thanks you for the post Guard.
It seems that the internal company mindset is that the scorpions are nice but not overly valuable gifts. I don't think that this was communicated well enough.
(The in game price drop after the leaked mail and the surprised player reactions are a pretty good indicators of this) |
|

ISD Eshtir
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
500

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:40:00 -
[139] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Personally I would like the rewards to be out of game.
But the biggest thing is for CCP to be transparent in these types of things, it looks dodgy when these kinds of things are hidden. You might not have meant for these to be kept a secret but you did not announce them your selves so that makes it just as responsible.
Also some customer service training for some ISDs wouldn't go astray. Closing a threadnaught and directing it to two different topics just showed us that they didn't have a clue. That just made it look like CCP where deliberately trying to shut down the communication on this issue by burying it in other topics.
As to the CSM some have shown (elsewhere) that they were pissed with the rest of us and others showed why the CSM regulations need the ability to recall members by the community because they had no clue what was going on.
Discussion of moderation is not allowed. If you feel we have done something in error, please file a support ticket. ISD Eshtir Vice Admiral Community Communication Liaisons Interstellar Services Department @ISD_Eshtir | @ISD_CCL |
|

None ofthe Above
842
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:41:00 -
[140] - Quote
Kuda Timberline wrote: ...and this is why "we" can't have nice things.
I was thinking this too.
Thanks, Guard for a thoughtful well considered response.
I think one of the key things is that CCP has been investing in its player base and working with player organizations to help EVE thrive.
It may very well be that CCP misstepped here, but clearly not out of malice or corruption. Overly enthusiastic and without due consideration perhaps.
Calls for out of game gifts are all well and good. That is certainly the fairest. But does it give CCP enough tools to get the job done? Meaning the job of sustaining and growing eve's population? The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit. |
|

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
579
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:42:00 -
[141] - Quote
Gougeres wrote: Well, I would disagree with some of what you have said, since it's the players that donate ISK to Somer that result in the sponsoring of events you noted, but I appreciate your reply.
They did not donate the ISK to somer, they paid for a service. In this case: entertainment.
If a player got rich by traiding, you would not say that people donated money to him. They paid him for a service, buying and selling goods. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:42:00 -
[142] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:Tau Cabalander wrote:I was disappointed to see those removed after the Incarna riots. I could imagine a CONCORD system set aside for just such a NCO museum. They put it back to the old monument a while back.
What a petty thing to do.
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

J3ssica Alba
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1017
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:43:00 -
[143] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person. 
pineapple and anchovy, best pizza combo This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.-á Without me, my signature is useless. Without my signature, I am useless |

Kate stark
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:43:00 -
[144] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:
1) plex isn't restricted to who gets it. 2) plex aren't free handouts from ccp.
two very important differences.
2) They are to certain media organizers and community sites, and have been on numerous occasions for quite some time. Look, we can say "no CCP involvement in helping fan sites," but that would probably end up being a net-negative. These giveaways can have a net-positive effect, when given to the right communities/events. But the magnitude of the reward should be kept in check. No one would care if Somer got 20 exotic dancers in-game from CCP. Everyone apparently cared when Somer was to get even a single Gold Magnate (enough for CCP to take that one off the table REAL quick). Clearly, the magnitude of the reward is something that is quite relevant.
there's a difference between "here, have a plex" and "here, let us give you a free account". i don't know how media accounts etc work but i'd imagine they're the latter not the former. and that's great because it doesn't **** with the sandbox.
pretty sure the magnate had some kind of lore issue with it too? or a story about there only being 1, or something equally noteworthy to do with it's rarity. i'll be honest; i don't really have much of an issue with the lottery prizes as i do with "here have a bunch of stuff that we're not going to tell anyone about".
i think while we disagree in the implementation, there is an issue that needs looking at. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:44:00 -
[145] - Quote
J3ssica Alba wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a terrible person.  pineapple and anchovy, best pizza combo
you're a terrible person, and you're wrong. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Metal Icarus
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
644
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:45:00 -
[146] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. if you have pineapple as a topping, you're a N AMAZING person. 
fix'd |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
1350
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:45:00 -
[147] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far.
what kind of pizza? There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... Winter Expansion new ship request |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2657
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:45:00 -
[148] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:
1) plex isn't restricted to who gets it. 2) plex aren't free handouts from ccp.
two very important differences.
2) They are to certain media organizers and community sites, and have been on numerous occasions for quite some time. Look, we can say "no CCP involvement in helping fan sites," but that would probably end up being a net-negative. These giveaways can have a net-positive effect, when given to the right communities/events. But the magnitude of the reward should be kept in check. No one would care if Somer got 20 exotic dancers in-game from CCP. Everyone apparently cared when Somer was to get even a single Gold Magnate (enough for CCP to take that one off the table REAL quick). Clearly, the magnitude of the reward is something that is quite relevant. Kate stark makes a really good point. I mean, let's say CCP hires cerberus to do another of his awesome ship sites. They pay him 5 grand. He takes the paycheck and spends it all on PLEX. ...so about 250 PLEX. What's the problem? That's reasonable. It's not even about the magnitude. Anybody could buy that much PLEX given the money and motivation. It's not an advantage. The only problem is if there's something given to them that's otherwise unobtainable to the other players. In the case of the IWS, it's not that big of a deal honestly. It's not a T2 BPO before invention, as some have likened it to. not even close. The ONLY problem is one of principal. So wtf over... PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:46:00 -
[149] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:First off , Somer Blink didnt get these ships, the individuals who work for SB did ... that doesnt mean that is ISK in SB pocket.. Individuals who were being paid for their efforts. If they earned a bonus, why wasn't it paid by their employer?
BigCountry wrote:Second .. they do contribute to the EVE community by backing almost every single contest or competition that people do.. They "give back" a fraction of the ISK they collect. Their real profit is not in ISK. It's in real life cash money. The ISK they collect is a means to an end. Sponsoring an event generates more business. While such sponsorship is a boon to the event, it represents ISK collected from and then partly refunded to the EVE community.
BigCountry wrote:Third.. I like the idea that CCP gives away something cool , even an ingame item... somethign not everyone has.. No where does it say CCP is obligated to maintain the value of "rare" items.. especially for an item they previously stated for an item that would be gifted to people as thank you items...
Fourth ... Haters and Cry Babbies , most people wanna cry about how much somer makes, what about the cost of running their site?? what about allll the free stuff they give away not only on their site , but to other people who run events and what not ... SB makes the money they do , cuz they are smart and found a way to make money, while letting people gamble and basicly get ships for less then they could ingame, with a chance... Yes, Somer is smart, and yes it is a very slick operation. Presumably it generates enough income to pay the cost of running the site and enough to stay in business. No argument there. But I wouldn't call it philanthropy. |

Gougeres
Bearded Dawn Silent Infinity
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:49:00 -
[150] - Quote
Edit - Removed my post |
|

Pharill
An Eye For An Eye AN EYE F0R AN EYE
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:53:00 -
[151] - Quote
K0ttDiledundee wrote:What about those of us who have played for many many years without breaks in our subscription.........where's our special rare items? We've spent years generating real content in the form of battles and participation in your game and we dont even get a thanjs. All sb does is rake in isk through controling a lottery with stacked odds in favor of fake/alt characters. And now they've been given even more isk. Sad ccp just sad.
*ahem* cry, cry, whine, moan, etc etc.
This it what it boils down to. "ME ME ME, I I I"
Anyone who feels like this .. Stick your rails up your rear and hit F1. CCP is a company and as such can do pretty much anything they damn well please with their product.
I have zero, zilch, nada issues with them giving away these ships. They are worthless in game and only worth isk because in game fools are willing to throw away billions on them. Here's a thought take the 15bill you're going to spend on that IWS and through it into BLINK. Even if you hate to gamble I bet you can turn a profit.
Oh and the complaint "They're for profit. You're making them richer" That's like giving Scrooge McDuck a million bucks and letting people say you made them rich. He's already rich! 300-600bill is a effing drop in Somers wallet.
So CCP you want people to shut up about the IWS give one to everyone, tha'll shut em' up. I fully support what you are doing, I personally don't really care who or how many of the IWS' you give away. And do you have to tell me about it? Heck no. Why? Because honestly it doesn't affect a single individual player in the entire cluster. |

Kate stark
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:53:00 -
[152] - Quote
Gogela wrote:PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me.
no, he's right with respect to handing out plex as rewards. whether scorpions, or a stack of plex; ccp are still giving players a fist full of isk and that fucks with the sandbox.
on the other hand, people buying and selling plex isn't an issue.
here's why; plex spawned by CCP and given out is a resource that has no limit and provides wealth in conjunction with the pilots day to day activities. plex purchased by your average joe eve player is limited to the cash in their bank account; and you can either earn money at work to turn plex in to isk, or play eve (don't argue that you can do both, because you're either going to get fired or make **** isk/hour to the point of irrelevance) and hence in some capacity plex via that method is limited.
however this really isn't about how plex works and lets shut up now please? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

E6o5
Tyler Durden Demolitions
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:55:00 -
[153] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS?
you can fly an iws
though isk wise they could have the same value |

E6o5
Tyler Durden Demolitions
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:57:00 -
[154] - Quote
out of game items only |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
580
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:57:00 -
[155] - Quote
Gougeres wrote:Edit - Removed my post. Edit: he removed his post while I was answering. German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1936
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:57:00 -
[156] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Kate stark wrote:
1) plex isn't restricted to who gets it. 2) plex aren't free handouts from ccp.
two very important differences.
2) They are to certain media organizers and community sites, and have been on numerous occasions for quite some time. Look, we can say "no CCP involvement in helping fan sites," but that would probably end up being a net-negative. These giveaways can have a net-positive effect, when given to the right communities/events. But the magnitude of the reward should be kept in check. No one would care if Somer got 20 exotic dancers in-game from CCP. Everyone apparently cared when Somer was to get even a single Gold Magnate (enough for CCP to take that one off the table REAL quick). Clearly, the magnitude of the reward is something that is quite relevant. there's a difference between "here, have a plex" and "here, let us give you a free account". i don't know how media accounts etc work but i'd imagine they're the latter not the former. and that's great because it doesn't **** with the sandbox. pretty sure the magnate had some kind of lore issue with it too? or a story about there only being 1, or something equally noteworthy to do with it's rarity. i'll be honest; i don't really have much of an issue with the lottery prizes as i do with "here have a bunch of stuff that we're not going to tell anyone about". i think while we disagree in the implementation, there is an issue that needs looking at.
They extend the game time on one of your accounts. You can nominate which (as that account has certain limitations, such as not being allowed to run for CSM, and so on. I nominated a different account, as you might expect.)
The Magnate was a problem, due to lore issues.
I have fewer issues with Somer giveaway of other things. Something to know: Somer never had them. CCP delivered the prizes directly, so Somer had no option to not give them away. And I don't doubt that they kept track of who the alts of the staff of Blink are, wrt to who got the prizes.
tbh, the current price of the IScorp is just a teeny tiny bit crazy.
Keeping this kind of thing to vanity items works for me.
Disclosure: I was one of the winners (Around 300 tickets, if memory serves). And I have a media account. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
188
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:57:00 -
[157] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Thanks for the statement. However, it doesn't particularly address the glaring fact that SOMER received free trips to Fanfest and unique ships for a "fair" contest "for the community" that CCP has no control over or audit power for. Further, the contest is inherently biased toward people who blow billions of isk playing blinks, giving them a disproportionate amount of entries for unique ships only obtainable through this medium (not to mention making SOMER even more isk), as well as giving a player-run, for-profit corporation the ability to decide who can even have a chance at winning it, considering SOMER Blink solely and unilaterally has the power to ban accounts at will.
The fact that you guys earlier compared SOMER Blink to a charity is shocking, off-putting and shows a deep disconnection between what CCP believes "a community service" is and what the players do. Many players believe that "a community service" is something that actually enriches the game or provides content to it. SOMER Blink is a third party website created solely to print isk for its founder. They provide no services in game. At all. (This doesn't even to speak to the fact that serious concerns exist for many players to the legitimacy of the SOMER Blink lottery system. For example, how is it that the player with the most blinks won, Replacement 234, doesn't appear in the most blinks played? Is Replacement 234, with an win rate at a minimum of 32.7%+ simply luckier than the next-highest winner, Featious who has a 28.8% win rate? Or the highest winner (with over 9 TRILLION isk more than Replacement 234) doesn't even appear to have played or won the most blinks?)
The difference in your example of "go to game trade show, get swag" and the SOMERgate fiasco is that as players we can choose to attend game trade show--at our wills--and get swag. We don't, however, have the luxury of playing blinks if the account is banned. Further, you're not limiting the prize pool to players attending EVE Vegas, as your trade show example would indicate. It is open to anyone willing to blow billions of isk on blinks. Even then, they would still have an inequitable chance of winning against other players who have a disproportionate amount of tickets. Your basic example of simply playing a promo blink and having an entry is pedantic at best and deceitful at worst, considering that everyone knows that blink players will have hundreds or thousands of tickets entered.
It's good that you've put future plans on hold for hopefully a better process. It's unfortunate, though, that you decided to stop recognizing community sites short of providing rewards to meaningful providers of content in the game, instead opting to enrich a for-profit corp's wallet instead. The fact that you haven't pulled the unique rewards, given the glaring deficiencies in using SOMER Blink as the provider of the contest, shows me that CCP has only a passing concern to the legitimate grievances we players have. CCP owes nothing to SOMER Blink, and if this were believed by CCP, it would have pulled the unique and fantastical prizes in favor of something more traditional like PLEX packs or Collector's Editions.
Well said and sorry the damage is now increasing. The fact there was no community session during the CSM summer summit is at best a slap in the face to all of us and to why the CSM was started. You guys had a chance to run this by them 2 months prior to EVE VEGAS and didn't That was flat out wrong. I am holding back so much more and the more I read the sadder I get. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:57:00 -
[158] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame. See and this is exactly why this was such a bad idea. CCP is financing the PvP activities of a group picked by CCP. That's the last thing that should ever happen in a sandbox and it clearly shows how these give-aways can influence the competitive surroundings of everyone in the game. Some random person might have gotten his ship blown up only because CCP financed your PvP.
Crasniya wrote:Character-binding things is very much not in the spirit of EVE, and I don't think that should ever happen. When I say character-bound stuff I don't actually envision soulbound ships (which won't happen anyway if only for the extra programming work), I rather envision something like a medal which I think is not un-Eve-ish in any way. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2657
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 20:59:00 -
[159] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me. no, he's right with respect to handing out plex as rewards. whether scorpions, or a stack of plex; ccp are still giving players a fist full of isk and that fucks with the sandbox. on the other hand, people buying and selling plex isn't an issue. here's why; plex spawned by CCP and given out is a resource that has no limit and provides wealth in conjunction with the pilots day to day activities. plex purchased by your average joe eve player is limited to the cash in their bank account; and you can either earn money at work to turn plex in to isk, or play eve (don't argue that you can do both, because you're either going to get fired or make **** isk/hour to the point of irrelevance) and hence in some capacity plex via that method is limited. however this really isn't about how plex works and lets shut up now please? I explained how it works. Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference?
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:02:00 -
[160] - Quote
Gogela wrote:The Devs get a cash reward for building the game. The web designer got a cash reward for building this forum. WTF is the difference if they want to pay people cash for building a community site? ... Cash is an out-of-game "reward". I don't see anything wrong with CCP giving cash to anyone and everyone they want, for any reason. For one thing, it would cost them real money, unlike in-game items which they are in the unique position of being able to spawn at will.
But when you give cash to someone, they are in the same position as the rest of us. Some of us have less money and some have more, but we each decide how much of our money to take from our real life wallet and put into this game. That's fundamentally different from an in-game reward, which enhances the recipient's in-game wealth or experience at no personal cost.
|
|

Klyith
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
30
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:03:00 -
[161] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
First and foremost, whenever in-game anything goes from dev spawned to players hands is should be public knowledge. Absolutely. Big promotions like the giveaways at fanfest and gamescom have publicity, selective things like the IScorps should as well. It doesn't need to be a big devblog announcement or anything, just a dev thread on the forums that you post in whenever a reward gift is given would be enough. As long as it's public and the general players have a chance to know about it soon after the recipients.
Only items below an ISK value is impossible, because as long as something is unique it has value to some players. Non-transferable items would be a great idea for this type of thing, but not if it would require new work to implement to a game where everything is transferable.
What I would encourage you to do is think a little bit about how you define "fansite". When us goons asked "why not Zoidberg Goonfleet?", it was not serious. We don't expect to get gifts in return for running one of eve's highest traffic non-profit websites. But Somer Blink is a for-profit enterprise. I think you've given things to GTC sellers (to use as prizes for their customers) before, so giving promotional items to Somer isn't unprecedented. But I think many people feel it's a bit crass to give Somer the same items in the same method you use to reward real volunteers. |

Kate stark
582
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:03:00 -
[162] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me. no, he's right with respect to handing out plex as rewards. whether scorpions, or a stack of plex; ccp are still giving players a fist full of isk and that fucks with the sandbox. on the other hand, people buying and selling plex isn't an issue. here's why; plex spawned by CCP and given out is a resource that has no limit and provides wealth in conjunction with the pilots day to day activities. plex purchased by your average joe eve player is limited to the cash in their bank account; and you can either earn money at work to turn plex in to isk, or play eve (don't argue that you can do both, because you're either going to get fired or make **** isk/hour to the point of irrelevance) and hence in some capacity plex via that method is limited. however this really isn't about how plex works and lets shut up now please? I explained how it works. Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference?
read the post you quoted for the explanation of the difference! also, stop derailing the thread. this isn't about how plex works. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Tao Dolcino
Radio Silence Inc.
231
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:10:00 -
[163] - Quote
Seras VictoriaX wrote:Out of game rewards only please.
This.
Thank you CCP Guard and Manifest for your posts. Finally it sounds like we can have a good and constructive level of communication. I will reopen my subscription.. So sad that i have no trust in this CSM anymore to defend a clean and sane EVE after reading what many of their members have written during the somergate. Favoritism is good - CCP 2013 |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2657
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:11:00 -
[164] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me. no, he's right with respect to handing out plex as rewards. whether scorpions, or a stack of plex; ccp are still giving players a fist full of isk and that fucks with the sandbox. on the other hand, people buying and selling plex isn't an issue. here's why; plex spawned by CCP and given out is a resource that has no limit and provides wealth in conjunction with the pilots day to day activities. plex purchased by your average joe eve player is limited to the cash in their bank account; and you can either earn money at work to turn plex in to isk, or play eve (don't argue that you can do both, because you're either going to get fired or make **** isk/hour to the point of irrelevance) and hence in some capacity plex via that method is limited. however this really isn't about how plex works and lets shut up now please? I explained how it works. Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference? read the post you quoted for the explanation of the difference! I did and it doesn't address what I said at all. PLEX = $20. I'm a web designer in RL. So if I do a site for company X and charge them 5 grand, I could get 250 PLEX. I could do that right now. If CCP had me do a site I would charge them real life money for my real life work. I don't care about EvE at this point I care about getting paid for my work. They pay me 5 grand and I buy 250 PLEX. The only difference between these scenarios is who my RL client was... and what does that matter? Answer that.
There is one difference. EvE players who build sites for the community do it because it's fun. Thus, they will work for peanuts. It's good business to pay eve players to develop their labors of love, and encourage more of it. It's a frickin' bargain.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:12:00 -
[165] - Quote
Gogela wrote:I explained how it works. Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference? I agree with you to some point. I would say it is a matter of quantity though. If CCP decided to hand just enough cash to a non-profit 3rd party community person to help with hosting costs or such I could live with that.
If CCP were "contracting" a community dev as you call it, then they are IMO business partners and I would expect that the community dev would have to follow rigid rules regarding his in-game activities similar to a CCP dev. Basically a business partner of CCP can't be a regular player anymore cause that would indeed hurt the sandbox. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
189
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:13:00 -
[166] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
1. Somer did not support any events the eve community and it players did by playing a out of game gambling lottery.
2. They used the profits the took as the house to gain your favor and then gain legitimacy as a trusted CCP site to further there ability to make more isk.
3. So is Somer Blink a CCP owned Fansite? If not they are in the sandbox and are now 100% CCP approved and that my friend is more valuable then any ship or ingame item. Every player of this game will see somer and in turn see CCP. I guess all we need now is a player of somer to commit suicide over losing all his isk and then blaming CCP.
4. Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself?
On and On
|

Freelancer117
so you want to be a Hero
84
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:15:00 -
[167] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: letGÇÖs go through what happened, why it happened, what else has happened, and then letGÇÖs have a discussion on what all of us want to happen in the future
First, what is the Ishukone Watch Scorpion?
The IWS was originally created as a vanity item to be sold in the NeX store for Aurum, but once that plan was cancelled, the Community Team secured it as a promotional item to be given out for various efforts or events.
Your first mistake: the "vanity item" was considered controversial because of the whole "greed is good" debacle. And you kept it so you can give it away for free, without players having to gain it through actual eve gameplay.
How many exist and who have you given them to?
Your second mistake, giving these "particular ships" out as rewards for services rendered is a relatively new initiative and we intended to gift them to more fansites and contributors. These "particular ships" are part of the eve ingame lore, and should not just "magically" appear out of air, but has to be tied into the Ishukone corporation.
Why hasnGÇÖt my favorite fansite or community enterprise received something nice too? If I don't care about the circle jerk ingame, I really don't care about who is buddy buddy oog concerning eve. Let the past affiliations to player alliances and subsequent conspiracy theories run loose imho, that's what the metagame is about.
How do these recent events compare with previous ones? WeGÇÖve always seen value in providing reasonable prizes to boost interest in events run by enthusiastic and capable players. ThereGÇÖs value in it for us as a company and for you as a community. Keep up the good work everyone, the community and the company CCP has to build a future for it's players.
Lastely: The IWS is a cool thing to have and thatGÇÖs why we use it as a reward, not because it carries X ISK value. I don't think CCP understand it's players concerns and should read the DNSBlack open letter to CCPgames and the csm-8:
"This is about receiving assets solely and directly from CCP itself vs earning them in game like everyone else. CCP can reward whoever they want to, how ever they want to, outside of game. as long as I donGÇÖt have to compete with the creators or benefactors of these sites at a disadvantage in game due to them having been given that advantage by CCP"
Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|

Kate stark
582
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:15:00 -
[168] - Quote
Gogela wrote:I did and it doesn't address what I said at all. PLEX = $20. I'm a web designer in RL. So if I do a site for company X and charge them 5 grand, I could get 250 PLEX. I could do that right now. If CCP had me do a site I would charge them real life money for my real life work. I don't care about EvE at this point I care about getting paid for my work. They pay me 5 grand and I buy 250 PLEX. The only difference between these scenarios is who my RL client was... and what does that matter? Answer that.
There is one difference. EvE players who build sites for the community do it because it's fun. Thus, they will work for peanuts. It's good business to pay eve players to develop their labors of love, and encourage more of it. It's a frickin' bargain.
yeah, my post covered that. since you have no intention of reading, i have no intention of further encouraging you to derail the thread. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Wollari
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:15:00 -
[169] - Quote
I'll stay out of the main fight here: I'm just leaving a quick note:
I prefer out-of-game items/merchandise/shirts compared to ingame items. I'm still using my eve cup from fanfest 2009 and still wearing proudly the fanfest shirts every attendee received or fleece jacket i bought. I mostly don't care about ingame items cause most of the time real-life, DOTLAN or chatting with (eve)friends is keeping me out-of-the-game.
That said I'm not totally against ingame rewards: I really like the ideas players brought up earlier to name stations/planets/landmarks/items etc. after community entities to show their respect. Giving out gametime (as free account(s) or gametime codes) is okay as well, I just have a bad feeling when player gifts are being abused to get an ingame advantage.
btw for the record: I just ordered/bought the collectors edition in the single hope that the developer/fansite community (and hopefully my fansite) is mentioned in the GÇ£Into the Second Decade" History Book. And tbh. It would be very disappointing if CCP would have left out the community that helped growing and supporting the player base. We'll see. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1762
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:17:00 -
[170] - Quote
I think it would be in everyone's best interest if CCP simply never again gave out freebies of any type whatsoever to anyone, for any reason at all. In game, out of game, no matter. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |
|

Kosakei Sanko
State War Academy Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:23:00 -
[171] - Quote
Throwing money at EVE and EVE-related events hardly qualifies as enriching the average player's EVE experience. If simply giving tons of money to the sandbox is the only qualifier, then every subscriber deserves some recognition and the long term subscribers something truly remarkable.
Before those less adept at critical thinking get a hold of this, let me state that I am not at all advocating this. The struggle is what sets this game apart from others, and there are certain groups that have actually contributed to the game by teaching, helping, and otherwise making it easier for people to enjoy this game. Those are the ones that deserve recognition in this form.
The remarkable thing about SOMER is that they've managed to find a way to take people's virtual currency even when they're not playing the game, but that shouldn't be rewarded, especially this impartially, because they're STILL PLAYERS.
Just to reiterate: not in favor of free stuff for everybody. Gimme a unique T2 Khanid battleship called the Castigator and I'd be willing to forget all this happened. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2659
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:24:00 -
[172] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:I did and it doesn't address what I said at all. PLEX = $20. I'm a web designer in RL. So if I do a site for company X and charge them 5 grand, I could get 250 PLEX. I could do that right now. If CCP had me do a site I would charge them real life money for my real life work. I don't care about EvE at this point I care about getting paid for my work. They pay me 5 grand and I buy 250 PLEX. The only difference between these scenarios is who my RL client was... and what does that matter? Answer that.
There is one difference. EvE players who build sites for the community do it because it's fun. Thus, they will work for peanuts. It's good business to pay eve players to develop their labors of love, and encourage more of it. It's a frickin' bargain. yeah, my post covered that. since you have no intention of reading, i have no intention of further encouraging you to derail the thread. All you did was copy and paste "PLEX doesn't work like that" over and over in so many words. I think you just don't have an argument or are trolling.
Rob Crowley wrote:I agree with you to some point. I would say it is a matter of quantity though. If CCP decided to hand just enough cash to a non-profit 3rd party community person to help with hosting costs or such I could live with that.
If CCP were "contracting" a community dev as you call it, then they are IMO business partners and I would expect that the community dev would have to follow rigid rules regarding his in-game activities similar to a CCP dev. Basically a business partner of CCP can't be a regular player anymore cause that would indeed hurt the sandbox.
"that the community dev would have to follow rigid rules regarding his in-game activities similar to a CCP dev..." so don't give out T2 BPOs or show favoritism? A 3rd party developer wouldn't have the capability to do those things. Those dev rules are in place because devs have placement and access above and beyond any player. It doesn't have anything to do with what I'm saying. Every penny CCP pays any 3rd party could theoretically be used to buy PLEX. As long as there is PLEX, this will always be the case. ...and it's fine.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:35:00 -
[173] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Rob Crowley wrote:that the community dev would have to follow rigid rules regarding his in-game activities similar to a CCP dev... so don't give out T2 BPOs or show favoritism? A 3rd party developer wouldn't have the capability to do those things. Those dev rules are in place because devs have placement and access above and beyond any player. While I don't know any details I would very much hope and assume that the code of conduct for CCP employees regarding in-game activities is much broader than just devhax. I would assume that they are not allowed to do anything of major significance like e.g. FCing for Goons or funding PL supercaps or building the next Blink-like thingy. I would also guess that they might get discouraged from engaging in the shadier activities of Eve like scamming, AWOXing or stuff like that. |

Buzz Madullier
The Essence of Nike
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:36:00 -
[174] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Thanks for the statement. However, it doesn't particularly address the glaring fact that SOMER received free trips to Fanfest and unique ships for a "fair" contest "for the community" that CCP has no control over or audit power for. Further, the contest is inherently biased toward people who blow billions of isk playing blinks, giving them a disproportionate amount of entries for unique ships only obtainable through this medium (not to mention making SOMER even more isk), as well as giving a player-run, for-profit corporation the ability to decide who can even have a chance at winning it, considering SOMER Blink solely and unilaterally has the power to ban accounts at will.
The fact that you guys earlier compared SOMER Blink to a charity is shocking, off-putting and shows a deep disconnection between what CCP believes "a community service" is and what the players do. Many players believe that "a community service" is something that actually enriches the game or provides content to it. SOMER Blink is a third party website created solely to print isk for its founder. They provide no services in game. At all. (This doesn't even to speak to the fact that serious concerns exist for many players to the legitimacy of the SOMER Blink lottery system. For example, how is it that the player with the most blinks won, Replacement 234, doesn't appear in the most blinks played? Is Replacement 234, with an win rate at a minimum of 32.7%+ simply luckier than the next-highest winner, Featious who has a 28.8% win rate? Or the highest winner (with over 9 TRILLION isk more than Replacement 234) doesn't even appear to have played or won the most blinks?)
The difference in your example of "go to game trade show, get swag" and the SOMERgate fiasco is that as players we can choose to attend game trade show--at our wills--and get swag. We don't, however, have the luxury of playing blinks if the account is banned. Further, you're not limiting the prize pool to players attending EVE Vegas, as your trade show example would indicate. It is open to anyone willing to blow billions of isk on blinks. Even then, they would still have an inequitable chance of winning against other players who have a disproportionate amount of tickets. Your basic example of simply playing a promo blink and having an entry is pedantic at best and deceitful at worst, considering that everyone knows that blink players will have hundreds or thousands of tickets entered.
It's good that you've put future plans on hold for hopefully a better process. It's unfortunate, though, that you decided to stop recognizing community sites short of providing rewards to meaningful providers of content in the game, instead opting to enrich a for-profit corp's wallet instead. The fact that you haven't pulled the unique rewards, given the glaring deficiencies in using SOMER Blink as the provider of the contest, shows me that CCP has only a passing concern to the legitimate grievances we players have. CCP owes nothing to SOMER Blink, and if this were believed by CCP, it would have pulled the unique and fantastical prizes in favor of something more traditional like PLEX packs or Collector's Editions.
Why is this getting ignored? |

Morphisat
Millard Innovation Inc The 20 Minuters
37
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:38:00 -
[175] - Quote
Weird, first the index indicated 14 pages and now it's down to 9 . Magic !  |

sally Deninard
mss industry
59
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:44:00 -
[176] - Quote
I really still am no clearer on this matter at all. The problem of the scorpions is that the award could be classed as "over the top and plain odd " as compared to other in game organisations. Eve uni for example does good things.... but you don`t give EVERY SINGLE eve uni member a free ship.
As for the lottery, much the same. You effectively custom skinned a ship for SOMER, it`s just over the top and makes it smell of corruption. The fanfest prizes too, each trip could fund Eve radio(which relies on paying subscribers to survive) for months. It just seems odd?
This is my most major question. Some players could not compete on the somer site due to somers own 3rd party toc`s and banning. The CSM told you this and you ignored them indirectly shutting out the opportunity to win these prizes. Why did you ignore the csm on this matter and what are you going to do for the players that could not compete on the somer site?
to quote from the csm thread "However, the requirement that one must be a member of SOMER Blink in order to participate remains, and for a lottery with such significant prizes, is very troubling to us. Furthermore, the structure of the lottery, which encourages and rewards extensive use of SOMER Blink, may raise legal concerns in some jurisdictions. For example, in the United States, commercial lotteries cannot require the purchase of a product or service in order to receive an entry.
For this reason, we strongly suggest that the entry mechanic be adjusted as follows:
1) Members of SOMER Blink are automatically entered into the lottery and receive one ticket, regardless of how much they use the site.
2) An alternate method (such as posting in a particular thread) be used to allow people to enter who do not wish to become a member of SOMER Blink."
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2660
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:45:00 -
[177] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:While I don't know any details I would very much hope and assume that the code of conduct for CCP employees regarding in-game activities is much broader than just devhax. I would assume that they are not allowed to do anything of major significance like e.g. FCing for Goons or funding PL supercaps or building the next Blink-like thingy. I would also guess that they might get discouraged from engaging in the shadier activities of Eve like scamming, AWOXing or stuff like that. I hate to dash your hopes but that is not the case. As long as they aren't spawning stuff out of thin air (devhax) even devs are encouraged to participate in the community. There's a long list of rules that go with it... for instance if someone with a player account is outted as a dev by a player, I think the dev has to stop playing that account. I don't know them all... but no we play alongside everyone. For all you know you've flown with CCP Greyscale himself on several occasions. 
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4281

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:47:00 -
[178] - Quote
Tinman Spectacular wrote:Some people have already mentioned this idea, and it's been done before. Immortalize individuals and corporations with permanent relics and monuments in-game as reward for their community contributions. You like what Somer is doing, why not a "Somer Gambling Hall" off Dodixie Fed Navy? You want to give credit to their members, let people warp to it and buy junk items like "1 blink credit - issued by [somer employee]." Like someone said, it's no different than "piece of steve," etc. Even better, let them name their junk item with your final approval. CCP gets an ISK sink. Somer employees get a very VERY special in-game achievement, and players get something to do other than buy a passport from Poitat. This would be an achievement most of us will never accomplish because of what they've done for the community, respect or hate it, their name will be remembered even after they unsub and nobody gets a tangible ISK advantage over anyone either directly or indirectly. I get that a couple billion ISK to outfits like Somer is just a rounding error, but it's still an in-game advantage. I also get ships and junk have been given before, so what? Things change in this game. -RvB gets some magical kill number in their eternal war, how about a flaming statue named after the pilot who died or something? -Some event attracts 10k people in local with super duper reinforced nodes, maybe they'll get a station named after them in that system? -How about an item for sale at SOE stations called "A Map of Eve - by Dotlan"? It's not that hard. Nobody will have a problem with this. The player is immortalized and the community gets FREE content; free as in I'm not paying $14/mo for in-game corps to get marketable items which benefit them in some tangible, non-existential manner, that may or may not be used against me. For comparison, for most players their corporate titles and medals are more meaningful and treasured than ISK gifts and their equivalencies (rare items and such). Usually you get them for spectacular in-game feats, or spectacular in-game failures. It's hard to say which kind is more regarded by the individual they were conferred upon 
Definitely one route we can take! And it's a cool one. Doesn't have to be the only one though. Also since we discussed "soulbound" items (heh I said this word on the EVE forums), medals for example are essentially that by default. Again...not the only thing we should look at. We should look at a lot of different things.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1936
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:48:00 -
[179] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Rob Crowley wrote:While I don't know any details I would very much hope and assume that the code of conduct for CCP employees regarding in-game activities is much broader than just devhax. I would assume that they are not allowed to do anything of major significance like e.g. FCing for Goons or funding PL supercaps or building the next Blink-like thingy. I would also guess that they might get discouraged from engaging in the shadier activities of Eve like scamming, AWOXing or stuff like that. I hate to dash your hopes but that is not the case. As long as they aren't spawning stuff out of thin air (devhax) even devs are encouraged to participate in the community. There's a long list of rules that go with it... for instance if someone with a player account is outted as a dev by a player, I think the dev has to stop playing that account. I don't know them all... but no we play alongside everyone. For all you know you've flown with CCP Greyscale himself on several occasions.  Buzz Madullier wrote:Maximus Andendare wrote:WALL OF TEXT Why is this getting ignored? ...something about pineapple pizza, i think.
I believe it's been said they're not supposed to gank people. (At which point some players complained.)
And I suspect also, something about it being almost 10pm in Iceland. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3806
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:51:00 -
[180] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
"the time was right to do stuff with them" is extremely vague. What criteria was used in this case exactly?
What was SB's "great contribution" to EVE exactly?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

Buzz Madullier
The Essence of Nike
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:57:00 -
[181] - Quote
Gogela wrote:
...something about pineapple pizza, i think.
Are you a magician? I just put a Hawaiian Pizza in the oven. :O |

G Nesh
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 21:59:00 -
[182] - Quote
First I'd like to say: This issue should be taken away from the forums and left strictly to the CSM to work out. This thread constitutes an end-around of the elected officials. The reason I'm saying this is I feel like the silent majority isn't being represented here, and that the squeaky wheel is getting the grease. This certainly is a tear harvest - content creations successful!
CCP Guard wrote:ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts. See above comment. This would be like the mayor of my town asking all citizens to call him about an economic development deal. Do you know many leaders who would actually do that? Very few are that crazy.
CCP Guard wrote:Should we stick to out-of-game things only? No, screw that. Somer Blink, TMC, eveonion, etc... has kept my interest beyond the massacre of my noobships by assholes with actual skill in better ships. They are well-run organizations that provide services to me and many of my comrades. (just kidding, I have no friends) The fewer people innovating and providing extra, sometimes out-of-game content, the fewer casual Calvins like me will be in-game to act as loot pinatas.
CCP Guard wrote:Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? I did not know they existed. As long as hordes of brave young pilots such as myself can blow them up, whatever floats your boat. However, this cannot be the way to cop out of truly rewarding innovation. I could see this turning into the "turkey for a christmas bonus" to all of these people who go above and beyond. (Look, honey! We can buy a space-pool after I apply the tramp stamp tattoo that ccp gave me for my awesome widget!)
CCP Guard wrote:Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Prizes in the context of junk with no combat advantage that I can win from these great organizations? It is still worth isk? Heck yeah to prizes. Heck no to the sentiment!
CCP Guard wrote:Only items below a certain expected ISK value? NO! GIVE UNTIL IT HURTS! Giveaways to people/groups who spend an extraordinary amount of time and their own money to make my game experience more enjoyable are good. 95% of the population of tranquility will never spend the isk on a fancy gimped ship, ridiculous eyepatch (yarr) or any other collector's item anyway, but a very large portion of them WILL use the services of the rewarded entities.
Offering in-game incentives to community builders = economic development. Plus you get all these delicious tears to boot!
Caving in to the pilots who, for the most part, suddenly exhibit "moral" opposition to supporting a popular player-run organization because it's a gambling site validates their own personal reasons for whining. Don't be an enabler... |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4283

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:00:00 -
[183] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered.
I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.
Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there.
p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Freelancer117
so you want to be a Hero
85
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:02:00 -
[184] - Quote
DJ FunkyBacon wrote:http://funkybacon.blogspot.com/2013/10/learning-from-past-and-moving-forward.html
My thoughts moving forward. I know some of you in Reykjavik have already seen it, but wanted to make sure I included it in your thread here too. Thanks you guys for pausing to put some thought into this.
Dam Funky, shameless plug, shouldn't you use the eve radio forums for that ?
Also, in before any CSM member post, maybe they do not missed their old job description ....  Eve rule no.1: The players will make a better version of the game, then CCP initially plans.
http://eve-radio.com//images/photos/3419/223/34afa0d7998f0a9a86f737d6.jpg
|

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1268
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:04:00 -
[185] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
No one is debating the effort. The point is they are doing it for profit and they are making a huge profit already. They do not need the additional profit handed to them by CCP. You are doing enough promoting them as is. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation The Cursed Few
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:05:00 -
[186] - Quote
End conclusion; the ships have been given out as prizes and as community rewards over 100 times before. Obviously the ships nor their value were EVER an issue before. Anyone screaming this is about the huge value of these ships can buzz off right now.
The core of this entire thing is simple; it's the perceived unfairness in peoples mind where an entity that is already making tons of money is getting tons more money for free. Even though its not tons of money, it's a ship with no real value.
"They don't deserve it! They take peoples money!"
It's a ridiculous statement really. And frankly it disgusts me that players of a game are bashing on the game's developer and ordering them who they can and can not reward. Because again; this isn't about the prizes given out. It never was. It's about who got them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoavH8xbrPE |

Galen Darksmith
Sky Fighters
44
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:06:00 -
[187] - Quote
[quote=CCP Guard Also since we discussed "soulbound" items (heh I said this word on the EVE forums) [/quote]
PURGE THE UNCLEAN
(have been clean since 2007)
I support the idea of ingame monuments. Like many other have pointed out though, you need to be VERY careful about rewarding for-profit or political entities. Groups like Chribba, RvB, EVE Uni, and so on are very apolitical and oriented towards providing a service to the community. Groups like SOMER Blink and TEST or Goonswarm have very specific goals meant to benefit their membership over non-members. Which is fine but as many have pointed out these entities are competing against each other in the sandbox, so getting what amounts to help from God is going to be frowned upon by the playerbase. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2660
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:08:00 -
[188] - Quote
Buzz Madullier wrote:Gogela wrote:...something about pineapple pizza, i think. Are you a magician? I just put a Hawaiian Pizza in the oven. :O I know some tricks, but I'm no space wizard
...you know that sounds really good to me right now. Hawaiian pizza for dinner it is! 
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Garandras
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:10:00 -
[189] - Quote
I say keep giving out ingame items to people/corps that put a effort into EvE
IWS is a status item.. if you see someone flying one its a mark that they have been reconised by the CCP (given they are the origonal owner)
Also the IWS has less of a impact on the EvE ecconomy than Plex.. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1937
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:10:00 -
[190] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Buzz Madullier wrote:Gogela wrote:...something about pineapple pizza, i think. Are you a magician? I just put a Hawaiian Pizza in the oven. :O I know some tricks, but I'm no space wizard ...you know that sounds really good to me right now. Hawaiian pizza for dinner it is! 
with or without slugs?(mushroom) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2660
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:13:00 -
[191] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Gogela wrote:Buzz Madullier wrote:Gogela wrote:...something about pineapple pizza, i think. Are you a magician? I just put a Hawaiian Pizza in the oven. :O I know some tricks, but I'm no space wizard ...you know that sounds really good to me right now. Hawaiian pizza for dinner it is!  with or without slugs?(mushroom) With. Definately. If I only get two toppings I usually go w/ pepperoni and mushroom. All pizzas require mushrooms. I didn't make the rules...
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1767
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:16:00 -
[192] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Because again; this isn't about the prizes given out. It never was. It's about who got them.
Correct. Which is why CCP should refrain from giving anything to anyone ever again. Then no one need experience the sheer amount of raw, jealous butthurt that has been displayed over the past couple of weeks.
Way to go, CCP. You have indirectly provided a 4th quarter windfall to hemorrhoid creme manufacturers. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation The Cursed Few
99
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:19:00 -
[193] - Quote
As an alternative to giving unique items, why not give people a unique tag or something. In reality what good is a unique ship if you can never show it off? The second you undock in it people just want to kill the thing for teh lulz.
Having a tag by your name somewhere would, at least to me, mean much much more in terms of recognition from CCP than an in-game item ever would. And at least that is something you can easily show off without even trying. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoavH8xbrPE |

ConranAntoni
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
97
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:22:00 -
[194] - Quote
Am I the only one who doesn't care as i'm not a self entitled whiney ***** like the rest of the uber mad posters? |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4286

|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:23:00 -
[195] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. 1. Somer did not support any events the eve community and it players did by playing a out of game gambling lottery. 2. They used the profits the took as the house to gain your favor and then gain legitimacy as a trusted CCP site to further there ability to make more isk. 3. So is Somer Blink a CCP owned Fansite? If not they are in the sandbox and are now 100% CCP approved and that my friend is more valuable then any ship or ingame item. Every player of this game will see somer and in turn see CCP. I guess all we need now is a eve player who started playing eve to kick his gambling habit to start playing somer and commit suicide over losing all his isk and then blaming CCP. Then we will see how much support CCP wants to give somer. 4. Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? On and On
In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy.
And I know you are less than happy about the way this went down. I get that, the sandbox is sensitive and complex and we're going to be taking a careful look at how we step in it as we've said.
Betting mechanics could be an interesting mechanic in the game but so far we haven't gotten around to prioritizing any such thing. Like with many other things, our community has beaten us to the punch.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Kregan Gadhar
Helion Production Labs Mildly Intoxicated
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:31:00 -
[196] - Quote
I'm sure this is about to get me some flames, but here goes anyways.
What is deemed a fansite?
I have paid for a corp website that the sole operation behind it is Eve related. Not open to the public like many other alliance/corp sites have theirs hidden. But there is game content in the site that isn't on Eve forums. There are things my members can see or do that they would have to write a program themselves to figure out if other sites don't have something like it.
There are director level things that we are able to keep up with based on the API key, thanks to one of the directors abilities to program, that isn't available on any outside site. Which all my guys know who that director is.
Where do you even draw those lines? I don't get isk for it or cash. It adds a bonus for people who have access. It is all about Eve with the exception of the Off Topics forum which even Eve Forums have. There are audio files talking about Eve things.
I don't care if I see anything from CCP on the ordeal and honestly even if it hit every criteria I wouldn't hold my breath. As much as I enjoy this game and it has held my attention for many of years, the shear ability to award/benefit the few over the many has been staggering over the years.
As has been stated, it is one thing to give awards at an Eve event that everyone in theory has an opportunity to show up at. Financial, job or family set aside, because those are separate issues to that kind of thing. If it is announced and the ability to get there is possible, that is one thing. Giving away things either through the lottery give away, or as a prize recognition that can benefit unfairly is really the issue.
Clearly I don't see this as a T20 issue revisited because that was a whole different ordeal altogether and it seems like these new policies being put into place could be a good thing. When you spring it on a group that has had things going one way for so long and don't announce things can be different, it leaves a bad taste. Seems like favoritism is being placed on people who are hidden behind alt names in a random selection system setup that at the end of the day is controlled by a person. Been an issue here almost from the start with CCP giving ships to be lotto'ed off and not seeing that it would only continue into handing out behind the scenes even more ships isn't just bad judgement. There is a point where it seems to be that it didn't matter how the community felt, but what CCP thought the few deserved despite the outrage of the many. |

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
290
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:32:00 -
[197] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
How is it any different to running an alliance with forums, mumble, support services, politics, metagaming etc? It's creating content, takes work, gets in the news. I fail to see how you think it's at all defensible to give 1 person items which they can then sell and potentially do something like buy a small fleet of supercaps with. What would have CCP done if somer put those ships up for gambling, made a trillion profit off them at no loss to himself, then given it to say PL to go and evict an alliance from it's sov? 1 trillion would have covered all the losses from the fountain war on both sides. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:33:00 -
[198] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:End conclusion; the ships have been given out as prizes and as community rewards over 100 times before. Obviously the ships nor their value were EVER an issue before. Anyone screaming this is about the huge value of these ships can buzz off right now. This is a logical fallacy. The majority of people have not been aware of the earlier reward give-aways, mostly because CCP never announced them. Their use as prizes was known but has nothing to do with this issue. A reward for which the recipient is chosen by CCP is very different from a prize for which everyone can compete under a known set of rules. Therefore an item might be completely fine as a prize, but not acceptable as a reward.
Quote:The core of this entire thing is simple; it's the perceived unfairness in peoples mind where an entity that is already making tons of money is getting tons more money for free. Even though its not tons of money, it's a ship with no real value. You're wrong about 2 things here: 1. It's not important if Somer is already making tons of money. The important thing is that they're operating for-profit and in competition with others. If they're successful or not in this competition doesn't matter. 2. The ship has real value. The value of a thing is what someone is willing to pay you for it. That's the only valid definition of value. Incidentally people were willing to pay ~20b for IshuScorps.
Quote:It's a ridiculous statement really. And frankly it disgusts me that players of a game are bashing on the game's developer and ordering them who they can and can not reward. Because again; this isn't about the prizes given out. It never was. It's about who got them. Wrong again, it is about both. Firstly, it is about the rewards which can influence the balance of the sandbox because of their value. And secondly, it is also about who got them, though not that is was specifically Somer, but in a more abstract sense that it was an in-game competitive for-profit organization. |

Doris Dents
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
340
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:40:00 -
[199] - Quote
I've bitched enough so thought I'd pop in and say thanks for listening CCP! Gifts and thank yous are fine long as they don't give arbitrary in-game leg ups to favoured groups. |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:41:00 -
[200] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P It's good he brought up the spotlight. The Community Spotlight also has no known rules or criteria. Each one amounts to an advertisement and that's the specific reason that I (as my alt Zaxix) poked CCP about Red Frog. By getting an RF spotlight, I accomplished a long held goal to get Red Frog's name on the login page. Frankly they don't need the advertising at this stage of the game, but for anyone not already familiar with EVE's courier services, it got the Frog some serious mind share and was a de facto CCP plug for the Frog. |
|

Alpheias
Euphoria Released Verge of Collapse
2844
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:45:00 -
[201] - Quote
As a longtime subscriber and as a player, I wish to extend my thanks to CCP that continue to ensure the greatest entertainment there is to be had from a forum and that is the greatest reward I personally could ever ask for.
It is like symphony orchestra, with CCP conducting and the musicians are goons, goon alts, some more goon alts, goon pets and wannabe goons. Allow me to be frank. You will not like me. You will not like me now, and you will not like men++ a good deal less as we go on. |

Kosakei Sanko
State War Academy Caldari State
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:46:00 -
[202] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't care as i'm not a self entitled whiney ***** like the rest of the uber mad posters?
I dunno. That sounded slightly mad to me. Gimme a unique T2 Khanid battleship called the Castigator and I'd be willing to forget all this happened. |

Frying Doom
2582
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:47:00 -
[203] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:The core of this entire thing is simple; it's the perceived unfairness in peoples mind where an entity that is already making tons of money is getting tons more money for free. Even though its not tons of money, it's a ship with no real value. Just like a stupid picture of sunflowers, absolutely worthless, its just canvas and some paint after all.
Until it becomes valuable just because its rare and Van Gogh is dead.
Any item that is rare in this game is valuable to collectors, saying it has no real value is ridiculous. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Zoe Armageddon
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:56:00 -
[204] - Quote
Without trying to go deep on explaining why, my preference for these types of rewards in future would run along the lines of:
- Untradable/otherwise technically valueless (and not able to be made valuable by demand) items or indicators of some kind to recognize player contributions. I was thinking there could be a faction that people could have standings towards, it could even give them a few perks in the right locations or something, but, unless that player sold their character entirely, which would be an unstoppable out of game action anyway, these perks would have no value to compete over in the economy.
- PLEX is a pretty safe and stable straight gift, especially given the total existing PLEX vs. the rate of gift giving, it would have no measurable or detectable impact on in-game economy and also represents a pretty predictable and comprehensible value, even if players openly brag about it. "It's just a plex, big deal, anyone can get one".
- But if you want something really clearly visible, such as a skinned ship, I would suggest one of two things. Either you make the ships unsellable, or (my preference) you make the skin an effect that appears on a normal ship, attached to the player, with their option to disable it if they want. So the dudes flying around in BRIGHT SHINY GOLD MYRMIDONS or something, everyone can see right away that they got recognition, but, otherwise it's just another ship-in-game. The side benefit is the player won't be afraid to actually fly that ship since the effect could show up for any new replacement they had to buy as well.
|

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 22:58:00 -
[205] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't care as i'm not a self entitled whiney ***** like the rest of the uber mad posters? If you didn't care, you wouldn't post.
Complaining about complaining. How meta. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
45
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:01:00 -
[206] - Quote
I think it would very interesting if CCP would peer into their database and tell us how many of the Ishukone ships are still owned by original recipients AND are not currently listed for sale in the market.
If it's a large proportion, it reinforces the notion that unique gifts are not primarily valued for the ISK they can be traded for. If not, it would indicate that a different mechanism might be better to introduce rare items into the game.
I have seen plenty for sale on the market, but it could be the same ones over and over.
|

ConranAntoni
Empyrean Warriors Insidious Empire
99
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:02:00 -
[207] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:ConranAntoni wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't care as i'm not a self entitled whiney ***** like the rest of the uber mad posters? If you didn't care, you wouldn't post. Complaining about complaining. How meta.
Postception. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:04:00 -
[208] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
Before I have had the chance of reading all the other posts I just want to comment: you still don't get it, do you? SOMEr is the WORST "fan site" you could have chosen to "reward" for its contributions to the GAME. I am very sad.
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2665
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:09:00 -
[209] - Quote
ConranAntoni wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote:ConranAntoni wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't care as i'm not a self entitled whiney ***** like the rest of the uber mad posters? If you didn't care, you wouldn't post. Complaining about complaining. How meta. Postception. FTFY 
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Plug in Baby
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:12:00 -
[210] - Quote
Not sure if this got missed pre- well earned Pizza break... I'll post again in case it was missed accidentally, if it was intentionally ignored feel free to do so again and sorry for spam.
Plug in Baby wrote:Thanks for the reponse, although not entirely sure why you bothered thanking the CSM, if their role had any value surely they would have been consulted beforehand.
Just an additional question that has come out of this, apologies if this is off-topic but it seems that any thread with the word Somer in it should be kept to one thread at the moment.
Are Somers GTC selling activities acceptable with regard to the EULA?
I.e. Could I, provided I set up a website:
A) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK for $5 profit
B) Sell a GTC + 100m ISK value of lottery tokens for $5 profit
C) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK for $200 profit
D) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK value of lottery tokens for $200 profit This is not a forum alt, this is a forum main. |
|

Edward Pierce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
122
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:13:00 -
[211] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:So, are you totally happy with this whole thing?
No weGÇÖre not. While we want to keep rewarding and encouraging projects that add value and are popular with our community, we absolutely agree that it has to happen in a way that the community is on board with, whether that means we have to make big changes or small tweaks.
Could you please touch on the problem where CCP keeps diving into things head first and end up apologizing afterwards, after the damage has been done?
It seems to be a reoccurring theme here where someone in CCP comes up with a brilliant, well intentioned, idea and inevitably fucks it up to the point where people are reaching for the pitchforks and torches, and only then does CCP go to the community for their feedback.
Is CCP intending to change their "do first, ask later" approach for a much more sensible "ask first, commit later" policy? If not, may I suggest this as a priority item over what kind of free stuff you want to give people? |

Plug in Baby
Crouching Woman Hidden Cucumber
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:15:00 -
[212] - Quote
Plug in Baby wrote:Thanks for the reponse, although not entirely sure why you bothered thanking the CSM, if their role had any value surely they would have been consulted beforehand.
Just an additional question that has come out of this, apologies if this is off-topic but it seems that any thread with the word Somer in it should be kept to one thread at the moment.
Are Somers GTC selling activities acceptable with regard to the EULA?
I.e. Could I, provided I set up a website:
A) Sell a GTC + 200m ISK for $5 profit
B) Sell a GTC + 200m ISK value of lottery tokens for $5 profit
C) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK for $200 profit
D) Sell a GTC + 10bn ISK value of lottery tokens for $200 profit
This is not a forum alt, this is a forum main. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:19:00 -
[213] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
Please now address the other side of the argument and try not to favour what you have already favoured in order to defend your earlier mistakes.
|

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
1769
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:21:00 -
[214] - Quote
Edward Pierce wrote:[
Could you please touch on the problem where CCP keeps diving into things head first and end up apologizing afterwards, after the damage has been done?
You assume that it is a problem, or that there was actually any significant damage. Even schoolchildren know that it is easier to beg forgiveness than to ask permission.
As a bonus, CCP now has raw data on how many people will scream bloody murder over things like this in the future, and how it does or does not significantly impact subscription numbers. You can be certain that this data will hold more weight in their decision making process than anything the CSM or anyone else has to say. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruiting pilots for lowsec solo & small gang operations. Visit our website at www.rifterlings.com or join our in game channel weflyrifters to speak to a recruiter. |

Sir Spottington
Merchants Trade Consortium The Last Chancers.
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:24:00 -
[215] - Quote
bet this giveaway to blink was the EA guys idea
*puts on tinfoil hat*
seriously though, just name a station or statue in game after them or something like that.... or a item like a BLINK gambling guide explaining who they are with a link to blink in the description, like the collectable items and give them to everyone (im sure blink would love this, more people that know about them the more isk they make)
or just give them a trip to your offices in iceland, a fanfest trip, USB rifter, danger game.... out of game stuff that doesn't make them 100's of billions of isk in game.
kinda weird logic to give ships worth tonnes to a corp that already claws in probably more isk than they know what to do with.
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:27:00 -
[216] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:thanks for the dev blog, so far I'm liking what I read. the recent events had me quite alarmed and i did not renew the first round of my accounts that expired, awaiting CCP response first.
so, with the rewards program currently suspended and being looked at again in light of current happenings, i take it that the number of scorpion ishukone watch present in game now will remain stable and any new giveaways will be using new prizes, which are hopefully out of game or non-transferable? as some others mentioned prior, even some plex wouldn't be bad, as those can also be used for stuff like subscription or re-sculpts. just please, no more rare items! That's what we're pausing until we have a better system the community feels better about; All selective give-aways of rare in-game items.
But that is not all the community is worried about. The give-away of trillions of isk to favoured sites is perhaps an even bigger issue than just rare items being handed over. Please take all issues under consideration. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
65
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:27:00 -
[217] - Quote
CCP,
IMHO, WTH ????????????? Come on CCP, I don't think you have addressed alot of the community's concerns.
As Somer is a gambling site :
- What was the process that determined that Somer are honest? ( Were they actually audited? ) - CCP Navigator basically declaring that Somer is not a scam, ( IMO, I think it is ).
- Is CCP going to continue to associate with gambling sites? - Does CCP endorse gambling?
So Somer have sponsered Eve related events and have provided advertising opportunities for Eve.
- What positive contribution to the community have Somer provided? - How does Somer have the financial ability to do what it does? - "Is Somer involved in RMT?????????????"  
- Will CCP eventually end up still providing gambling sites with Eve goodies? ( IMO nothing should be given to any gambling sites ).
- Will CCP decide that Somer is OK and "Hunky Dory", just because it's anothere good means of cash revenue for them? - Will CCP choose money or "company / personal / game" integrity?
IMO, CCP should distance itself from all gambling sites. ( My apologies to the other gambling sites ).
- How exactly is CCP going to avoid secrecy so as to remain transparent? - Why not reward the positive community contributors with "out of game" stuff only.
- New rules and guidelines should be set up and introduced.
I'm sure there are, ( sadly ), more issues, but I can't think of them right now.
Please CCP, you have a major mess on your hands. Please, fix it. |

Sturmwolke
459
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:29:00 -
[218] - Quote
This approach of giving rewards to third-party EVE related sites (which has the potential to be converted into ingame isk or create a player advantage) has to stop. You will breed nothing of any real value when you start putting a price reward (read bribe) to fandom. It'll be fertile ground for distrust and alienation between the haves and have nots. It erodes a lot of goodwill towards CCP.
A truly passionate community does need any cajouling, prodding or bribes, to do whatever they do. Remember that.
Find other ways to recognize their contributions without raising the players' hackles. Very simple things like a CCP Recognition Seal which can be displayed on their sites ... an official CCP Fansite Hall of Fame ... unique plaque to display in their Captains Quarters ... an ingame monument somewhere .. etc etc. ... you get the idea. These things will remain immortal until EVE closes down. Your "one time" monetary rewards will be forgotten long before that happens ... now wasn't that a pointless exercise?
Deep down, fans want to be remembered and immortalized in some way or another.
|

Zella Polaris
Pitchfork Militia Catastrophic Uprising
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:30:00 -
[219] - Quote
This whole boondogle has a simple solution.
1) Announce a limited run of certain ships (say, 100 or 500) for reward purposes.
!! Congratulations, you have now solved the "devaluation" concerns!
2) Give out ships as rewards within a reasonable, specified time-frame (say, 1-3 months).
!! Congratulations, you have now solved the "cashing-out early" concerns!
3) Announce the winners on a public website.
!! Congratulations, you have now solved the "Transparency" concerns! Pitchfork Militia is now recruiting PvP-oriented pilots. Catastrophic Uprising is now recruiting corporations for NPC nullsec. |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1383
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:32:00 -
[220] - Quote
I'm satisfied. It was simply a case of not thinking through every possible outcome, which happens to all of us, especially when we're engaged in a process that is meant to generally be positive with no "losers".
Lesson learned, time to move on.
I'm actually somewhat disappointed tough, in that I was kind of looking forward to unsubbing from this terrible game that I really don't play, yet will stick around giving CCP my :15bux: because I like them and think they deserve it. Well played, CCP. Well played.
Also, holy cocks, never let CCP Guard leave. His posts are like a cool gentle breeze of soothing mountain air. I feel calm and confident when I know CCP Guard is on the job. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1383
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:35:00 -
[221] - Quote
Give the man a raise or a bonus.
(not a guard alt btw) Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:36:00 -
[222] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:If fan-sites etc are rewarded with isk, be it in the form of rare ships or whatever, could it not lead to a situation whereby some folk will learn how to milk-abuse the rewards system? Not unless we design a bad system :). But seriously, that's not going to be a problem. We're not novices when it comes to providing incentives. We've had a fansite program since forever that rewards registered fansites that meet our standards with free accounts and we've gotten pretty good at knowing what constitutes a worthy contribution there. Also just so it's clear we don't award straight ISK.
Oh come on! You have given SOMER rare ships that are worth billions and the fact that it can be only won via SOMER raked in god knows how much ISK for SOMET and you call that not rewarding straight ISk ... That is more than a very thin line. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:45:00 -
[223] - Quote
ISD Eshtir wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Personally I would like the rewards to be out of game.
But the biggest thing is for CCP to be transparent in these types of things, it looks dodgy when these kinds of things are hidden. You might not have meant for these to be kept a secret but you did not announce them your selves so that makes it just as responsible.
Also some customer service training for some ISDs wouldn't go astray. Closing a threadnaught and directing it to two different topics just showed us that they didn't have a clue. That just made it look like CCP where deliberately trying to shut down the communication on this issue by burying it in other topics.
As to the CSM some have shown (elsewhere) that they were pissed with the rest of us and others showed why the CSM regulations need the ability to recall members by the community because they had no clue what was going on. Discussion of moderation is not allowed. If you feel we have done something in error, please file a support ticket.
Support ticket filed. ISD made an error closing earlier topics about this subject.
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:54:00 -
[224] - Quote
Buzz Madullier wrote:Maximus Andendare wrote:Thanks for the statement. However, it doesn't particularly address the glaring fact that SOMER received free trips to Fanfest and unique ships for a "fair" contest "for the community" that CCP has no control over or audit power for. Further, the contest is inherently biased toward people who blow billions of isk playing blinks, giving them a disproportionate amount of entries for unique ships only obtainable through this medium (not to mention making SOMER even more isk), as well as giving a player-run, for-profit corporation the ability to decide who can even have a chance at winning it, considering SOMER Blink solely and unilaterally has the power to ban accounts at will.
The fact that you guys earlier compared SOMER Blink to a charity is shocking, off-putting and shows a deep disconnection between what CCP believes "a community service" is and what the players do. Many players believe that "a community service" is something that actually enriches the game or provides content to it. SOMER Blink is a third party website created solely to print isk for its founder. They provide no services in game. At all. (This doesn't even to speak to the fact that serious concerns exist for many players to the legitimacy of the SOMER Blink lottery system. For example, how is it that the player with the most blinks won, Replacement 234, doesn't appear in the most blinks played? Is Replacement 234, with an win rate at a minimum of 32.7%+ simply luckier than the next-highest winner, Featious who has a 28.8% win rate? Or the highest winner (with over 9 TRILLION isk more than Replacement 234) doesn't even appear to have played or won the most blinks?)
The difference in your example of "go to game trade show, get swag" and the SOMERgate fiasco is that as players we can choose to attend game trade show--at our wills--and get swag. We don't, however, have the luxury of playing blinks if the account is banned. Further, you're not limiting the prize pool to players attending EVE Vegas, as your trade show example would indicate. It is open to anyone willing to blow billions of isk on blinks. Even then, they would still have an inequitable chance of winning against other players who have a disproportionate amount of tickets. Your basic example of simply playing a promo blink and having an entry is pedantic at best and deceitful at worst, considering that everyone knows that blink players will have hundreds or thousands of tickets entered.
It's good that you've put future plans on hold for hopefully a better process. It's unfortunate, though, that you decided to stop recognizing community sites short of providing rewards to meaningful providers of content in the game, instead opting to enrich a for-profit corp's wallet instead. The fact that you haven't pulled the unique rewards, given the glaring deficiencies in using SOMER Blink as the provider of the contest, shows me that CCP has only a passing concern to the legitimate grievances we players have. CCP owes nothing to SOMER Blink, and if this were believed by CCP, it would have pulled the unique and fantastical prizes in favor of something more traditional like PLEX packs or Collector's Editions. Why is this getting ignored?
Why is this getting ignored? |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:57:00 -
[225] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered. I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe. Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there. p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P
In short .. it is about the money ... gambling money in this case. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.10 23:57:00 -
[226] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
You are still being very vague about what exactly SOMER Blink did to deserve such rewards. Please give a detailed description of what exaclty makes them so deserving.
Note: - Being "good at what they do" is not a valid reason; what they "do" is make ISK. If you are going to reward them for this, then you must reward every other player organization who earns above a set level of ISK. - Sponsoring events is also not a valid reason; like any other business, the reward for sponsorship is greater public visibility potentially resulting in additional business. Receiving an advantage over other participants is not a legitimate reward for sponsorship.
It's perfectly clear though that you were not "recognizing" SOMER for anything; by defintion, "recognition" requires some level of public awareness, and whether by intent or neglect, this was all kept under wraps. This has the result of looking a lot like market manipulation in order to favor one particular group of players.
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
Let's be perfectly clear on one thing: SOMER Blink is NOT a fansite! It is a for-profit business which supports an in-game player organization's activities. Please stop lumping them in with true fansites that actually benefit the community instead of taking from it.
CCP Guard wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Interesting angle actually. Because even when we design a more transparent system around this, it's not ever going to make everyone completely content all the time. But we'll always try to be as fair as we can.[/quote]
I find it highly disturbing that you consider this an "interesting angle," rather than this being something that was carefully considered before deciding to benefit a single for-profit business to the detriment of their competitors by driving traffic to their site and away from others. This should have been an obvious consequence of the lottery giveaway, yet your response seems to indicate that the thought never occured to you. To top it off, a certain CCP representative's remarks endorsing one particular site (effectively over others) just threw more fuel on the fire, and reeks of a lack of forethought on the effects of your actions as a company on the fairness of the game.
When all of this started, I held off on making any decisions with regards to the continuation of my account until after CCP had a reasonable opportunity to fix the situation. So far, I see no solutions, only PR spin. I'll give it a little more time as my account is not up right away, but if nothing changes soon I will be unsubscribing.
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:00:00 -
[227] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. 1. Somer did not support any events the eve community and it players did by playing a out of game gambling lottery. 2. They used the profits the took as the house to gain your favor and then gain legitimacy as a trusted CCP site to further there ability to make more isk. 3. So is Somer Blink a CCP owned Fansite? If not they are in the sandbox and are now 100% CCP approved and that my friend is more valuable then any ship or ingame item. Every player of this game will see somer and in turn see CCP. I guess all we need now is a eve player who started playing eve to kick his gambling habit to start playing somer and commit suicide over losing all his isk and then blaming CCP. Then we will see how much support CCP wants to give somer. 4. Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? On and On In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy. A
Thank you ... you now convinced me to not renew my subscription.
|

Clean Head
Space Jews United
47
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:03:00 -
[228] - Quote
sooo... my Vindicator that got blown up in a TCRC incursion site completely due to the fact that the server kicked me and a bunch of other people off at the same time with no warning (or visual cue when the disconnect happened, so couldn't even call out for shields), when do I get that back?
lol |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4388
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:07:00 -
[229] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks Guard! Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :)
What tingled my senses is that SOMER have been depicted as some charity.
I happen to manage the only surviving EvE <==> RL charity since years, and never got proposed a Rifter for it.
And I don't want a Rifter, I just don't want a casino being accosted to a charity. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:08:00 -
[230] - Quote
sally Deninard wrote:I really still am no clearer on this matter at all. The problem of the scorpions is that the award could be classed as "over the top and plain odd " as compared to other in game organisations. Eve uni for example does good things.... but you don`t give EVERY SINGLE eve uni member a free ship.
As for the lottery, much the same. You effectively custom skinned a ship for SOMER, it`s just over the top and makes it smell of corruption. The fanfest prizes too, each trip could fund Eve radio(which relies on paying subscribers to survive) for months. It just seems odd?
This is my most major question. Some players could not compete on the somer site due to somers own 3rd party toc`s and banning. The CSM told you this and you ignored them indirectly shutting out the opportunity to win these prizes. Why did you ignore the csm on this matter and what are you going to do for the players that could not compete on the somer site?
to quote from the csm thread "However, the requirement that one must be a member of SOMER Blink in order to participate remains, and for a lottery with such significant prizes, is very troubling to us. Furthermore, the structure of the lottery, which encourages and rewards extensive use of SOMER Blink, may raise legal concerns in some jurisdictions. For example, in the United States, commercial lotteries cannot require the purchase of a product or service in order to receive an entry.
For this reason, we strongly suggest that the entry mechanic be adjusted as follows:
1) Members of SOMER Blink are automatically entered into the lottery and receive one ticket, regardless of how much they use the site.
2) An alternate method (such as posting in a particular thread) be used to allow people to enter who do not wish to become a member of SOMER Blink."
Especially in light of the whole issue with player participation the in-game RP channels, this definitely requires some attention. This appears to be a direct contradiction of previously stated policy, yet there has been no official explanation for the discrepancy. To the contrary, it has been widely avoided and ignored. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
676
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:33:00 -
[231] - Quote
For those of you wondering,
We ARE reading this threa (as well as the others) but the purpose of this is to get your feedback.
If you want to be represented don't you think it is best that we do that rather than just going off to do what 'we think is best for you'?
I am talking to a lot of players in channels and you are welcome to evemail me with your opinion but please, boil it down, dial back the rhetoric and get to the point.
What would YOU like to see, going forward?
Awards or not
in game out of game, what sort?
how are they chosen?
how is it kept transparent
I am here to listen
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Sabriz Adoudel
Compulsory Euthanasia
961
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:38:00 -
[232] - Quote
Happy that this debacle is unlikely to be repeated.
I have no issue with open, transparent gifting of items that do not have a non-trivial lasting effect on the game's PVP aspects (the market of course being a PVP aspect). I'm willing to tolerate open, transparent gifting of things like Alliance Tournament ships - despite the (secondary market value) 3+ trillion ISK prize for winning an AT being economy warping, the AT offers enough to the game for it to be worthwhile.
This incident was not open, not transparent, and provided a non-trivial effect on the market (the effective transfer of ISK from those that had previously purchased IWS's as a collectible to SOMER). Due to SOMER directors having links to CCP staff it also reeked of collusion.
As a suggestion, in future whenever gifting enough rare items that you'll increase the number in circulation by more than 1-2%, please provide the community 7 days notice of your provisional decision to do so and why the recipients deserve it. Following that would have prevented this debacle.
Also, untradeable vanity items would be excellent awards to use in future. No economic impact, no ship PVP impact. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. Say NO to GM-player collusion - Boycott SOMER Blink |

Kern Hotha
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:41:00 -
[233] - Quote
The original post still doesn't address the problem: gambling isn't a beneficial service that enriches the "community", and Somer/BIG/EOH don't deserve any CCP favoritism or collusion.
I'd prefer future official rewards be constrained by two simple rules: 1. Recognition will be granted only to a person or group whose activities actually benefit the game. 2. The reward will have no isk value but be of superlative status; e.g. a commemorative statue.
We distinguish the excellent man from the common man by saying that the former is the one who makes great demands upon himself, and the latter who makes no demands on himself.
Jose Ortega y Gasset (1883 - 1955) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4303

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:51:00 -
[234] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Guard wrote:We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
You are still being very vague about what exactly SOMER Blink did to deserve such rewards. Please give a detailed description of what exaclty makes them so deserving. Note: - Being "good at what they do" is not a valid reason; what they "do" is make ISK. If you are going to reward them for this, then you must reward every other player organization who earns above a set level of ISK. - Sponsoring events is also not a valid reason; like any other business, the reward for sponsorship is greater public visibility potentially resulting in additional business. Receiving an advantage over other participants is not a legitimate reward for sponsorship. It's perfectly clear though that you were not "recognizing" SOMER for anything; by defintion, "recognition" requires some level of public awareness, and whether by intent or neglect, this was all kept under wraps. This has the result of looking a lot like market manipulation in order to favor one particular group of players. CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members. Let's be perfectly clear on one thing: SOMER Blink is NOT a fansite! It is a for-profit business which supports an in-game player organization's activities. Please stop lumping them in with true fansites that actually benefit the community instead of taking from it. CCP Guard wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote: 4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Interesting angle actually. Because even when we design a more transparent system around this, it's not ever going to make everyone completely content all the time. But we'll always try to be as fair as we can. I find it highly disturbing that you consider this an "interesting angle," rather than this being something that was carefully considered before deciding to benefit a single for-profit business to the detriment of their competitors by driving traffic to their site and away from others. This should have been an obvious consequence of the lottery giveaway, yet your response seems to indicate that the thought never occured to you. To top it off, a certain CCP representative's remarks endorsing one particular site (effectively over others) just threw more fuel on the fire, and reeks of a lack of forethought on the effects of your actions as a company on the fairness of the game. When all of this started, I held off on making any decisions with regards to the continuation of my account until after CCP had a reasonable opportunity to fix the situation. So far, I see no solutions, only PR spin. I'll give it a little more time as my account is not up right away, but if nothing changes soon I will be unsubscribing.
You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
191
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:54:00 -
[235] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:CCP Guard wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. 1. Somer did not support any events the eve community and it players did by playing a out of game gambling lottery. 2. They used the profits the took as the house to gain your favor and then gain legitimacy as a trusted CCP site to further there ability to make more isk. 3. So is Somer Blink a CCP owned Fansite? If not they are in the sandbox and are now 100% CCP approved and that my friend is more valuable then any ship or ingame item. Every player of this game will see somer and in turn see CCP. I guess all we need now is a eve player who started playing eve to kick his gambling habit to start playing somer and commit suicide over losing all his isk and then blaming CCP. Then we will see how much support CCP wants to give somer. 4. Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? On and On In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy. A Thank you ... you now convinced me to not renew my subscription.
Exactly and that is favortisum Guard. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2667
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:55:00 -
[236] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:*snip* What would YOU like to see, going forward?
Awards or not
in game out of game, what sort?
how are they chosen?
how is it kept transparent *snip* I liked the idea of in game monuments someone put forth. Non-transferable assets? Also an awesome idea and solves all problems in my view. Just pay them in PLEX? Sure, that works for me too. T-Shirts and shwag? Awesome!
How they are chosen: I don't know. I would say in several ways. If a CCP dev sees a cool fan site they are impressed with, sure. If the marketing department sees the tramendous value SOMER, EvE Poker, BIG Games, Entity, Chribba, cerberus, and the like provide... go for it. Hell if the CSM sees something they think is of value to the community it's totally cool with me. I don't know "how" they should be chosen... but I wouldn't restrict it too much. I'd open it up even more.
...and as a minor addendum, I would say this: Don't contract community sites. I am kicking around the idea of a new iteration of mine with another better known fan dev. We do it because we love the game. That's what makes sites awesome. There's no schedule... we just work when we can. ...but that gets you the best result because it's a labor of love and very personal. We do it our way on our time. That's what makes the best community sites. My hat is off to Entity and SOMER for all they do. I guarantee you they don't do it because they think CCP is going to give them some stuff. They do it for themselves, first and foremost. That's the motivation you want. The fact that we have so many awesome community sites is a testament to how awesome eve is and how loyal the fanbase is. Don't frack that up.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4303

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 00:58:00 -
[237] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:CCP Guard wrote:p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P It's good he brought up the spotlight. The Community Spotlight also has no known rules or criteria. Each one amounts to an advertisement and that's the specific reason that I (as my alt Zaxix) poked CCP about Red Frog. By getting an RF spotlight, I accomplished a long held goal to get Red Frog's name on the login page. Frankly they don't need the advertising at this stage of the game, but for anyone not already familiar with EVE's courier services, it got the Frog some serious mind share and was a de facto CCP plug for the Frog.
There's a lot of good projects and site we have yet to cover in the Community Spotlights and we can't do everyone at once.
What we've tried to do is focus on established things over brand new ones, but we've made exceptions in special cases for example when the Brave Newbies rose fast and hard because it was just such a good story. Timing is important (again) so if there's an upcoming event by someone we have on the back burner we may pull them up a few slots. Also we try to have diversity, not write about similar things week after week etc. But the selection method isn't highly developed or scientific and for something like this I don't think it can be, or that it has to be.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:02:00 -
[238] - Quote
Is there no plan to repair the damage already done by giving a player corp trillions of isk worth of 'stuff'? Was that plan OK'd by multiple members of CCP management or was that idea dreamed up and pushed through by an isolated group?
A lot of players really feel cheated by this whole fiasco - not in the manner that we feel we are owed something(or even want anything -I sure as hell don't). We just want the illusion of fairness restored - I mean, what is the point of playing monopoly with your friends if the bank straight up gives the third player on your left 200 bones 'because that player was cool'. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4305

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:08:00 -
[239] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks Guard! Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :) What tingled my senses is that SOMER have been depicted as some charity. I happen to manage the only surviving EvE <==> RL charity since years, and never got proposed a Rifter for it. And I don't want a Rifter, I just don't want a casino being accosted to a charity.
I have to correct that we haven't said that SOMER Blink is a charity :). Just that they sponsor events.
Just to let you know, if you have a charity event in mind and if you are interested, you can always contact the community team and we can look at options to support it in some way. I know it's not the point of your post but I'm just putting it out there :) CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:08:00 -
[240] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here.
There was a limit on quotes allowed in the post, and I did my best to distill it down while maintaining the essence. If I misunderstood, please take the opportunity to explain rather than dismissing it outright.
For that matter, there were several valid and salient points in that post, and you seem to casually ignore all of them. Care to try again? Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Kuni Oichi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
131
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:10:00 -
[241] - Quote
With regard to the free Ishukone Scorpions given as freebies to the Somer blink staff:
1) What contributions to Eve were CCP recognising?
The bulk of staff at Somer blink, as I understand it, process deposits, hand out winnings, freighter ships/items and deal with customer service issues. For this they receive a plex per month and 90+ mil an hour (freighter pilots being paid per jump) for their 'work' for the company. What did CCP feel the need to further reward them for doing what they are there to do for their corporation.
2) If (speculating) that contribution to the community is in the sponsorship of events, why did CCP not give that recognition and reward to the people running the events, rather than those funding them via their own marketing?
With regard to the unprecedented largesse given for the Somer blink lottery
1) Was CCP aware of how Somer blink would run the lottery for the prizes they were given? Namely that instead of 1 ticket per person, customers/gamblers were heavily incentivised to put more and more money into somer blink to increase their chance of winning?
2) Was any consideration given that doing this would act as a huge promotion for Somer blink, increasing their short and long-term revenue. If not then what is CCP's thought on the enrichment of a corporation via freebies now? If it was, then why was this done?
3) Was any consideration given to the fact people would have to sign up to Somer Blink's services and participate in gambling? There are individuals who have rl gambling addiction (in fact the likelihood is that there are people in eve with gambling addiction because of somer blink) or religious probibitions against gambling.
With regard to this statement 'The IWS is a cool thing to have and thatGÇÖs why we use it as a reward, not because it carries X ISK value. The price people negotiate is wholly decided between individuals and is hard for us to predict with any precision. '
1) The price of most things in the game is easily checked via assorted means, why was this not a consideration and, moreover, why was there no consideration over the economic effects of keeping the 'gifts' secret?
CCP made exceptionally bold claims about Somer, assuring their reliability, that they'd never scammed etc. They were given unprecedented largesse not once, but twice - once in public, once without disclosure. Fundamentally then we have the same corporation being given special treatment by CCP on two occasions.
Going forwards
What would YOU like to see, going forward?
Awards Personally I think the community spotlight should be enough for most things. Likewise I'm not personally convinced someone needs to get a plex each month for running a blog on the game, but then that's a cheap marketing extra for CCP.
in game out of game, what sort?
Out of game for preference. Recognition is its own reward (the community spotlight) but t-shirts, rifter USBs etc. work as well. If not out of game then without economic or political value. Special pods that are a different colour, things that have no possible trade value, and they're lost if that character is sold.
how are they chosen?
There's no such thing as a fair metric for community recognition, because one person's excellent event is another person's 'meh' however it should be kept broad, the same company/individual shouldn't be getting rewarded twice in a short period of time as Somer was and it should take in the different facets of the game. EveMon/EveFit are indispensible tools, likewise Dotlan and Garpa. The Angel Project apparently does something to help new players (Though I doubt it's as good as Goon support for our newbies, but that's not exactly typical), someone whose name escapes me fought rifters in their nyx as part of the 10 year celebration etc. Those are all things that support the community and add value. Ohh and Goons got Eve on the BBC, so obviously we should be top of the list!
how is it kept transparent
You publish your guidelines on how people are chosen, you publish who is getting what (Why wouldn't you want people to know who CCP thinks deserves recognition, I'm frankly baffled it has been kept secret until now).
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:11:00 -
[242] - Quote
" We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
You are still being very vague about what exactly SOMER Blink did to deserve such rewards. Please give a detailed description of what exaclty makes them so deserving.
Note: - Being "good at what they do" is not a valid reason; what they "do" is make ISK. If you are going to reward them for this, then you must reward every other player organization who earns above a set level of ISK. - Sponsoring events is also not a valid reason; like any other business, the reward for sponsorship is greater public visibility potentially resulting in additional business. Receiving an advantage over other participants is not a legitimate reward for sponsorship.
It's perfectly clear though that you were not "recognizing" SOMER for anything; by defintion, "recognition" requires some level of public awareness, and whether by intent or neglect, this was all kept under wraps. This has the result of looking a lot like market manipulation in order to favor one particular group of players.
You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless.
This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
Let's be perfectly clear on one thing: SOMER Blink is NOT a fansite! It is a for-profit business which supports an in-game player organization's activities. Please stop lumping them in with true fansites that actually benefit the community instead of taking from it.
4. A Dev endorsed a player run lottery and specified that it was totally legitimate. CCP endorsements of player run businesses must never be allowed to happen. Ever. By endorsing one group over another, he has potentially crippled all of the competitors. Who would risk their ISK with anyone else?
Interesting angle actually. Because even when we design a more transparent system around this, it's not ever going to make everyone completely content all the time. But we'll always try to be as fair as we can.[/quote]
I find it highly disturbing that you consider this an "interesting angle," rather than this being something that was carefully considered before deciding to benefit a single for-profit business to the detriment of their competitors by driving traffic to their site and away from others. This should have been an obvious consequence of the lottery giveaway, yet your response seems to indicate that the thought never occured to you. To top it off, a certain CCP representative's remarks endorsing one particular site (effectively over others) just threw more fuel on the fire, and reeks of a lack of forethought on the effects of your actions as a company on the fairness of the game.
When all of this started, I held off on making any decisions with regards to the continuation of my account until after CCP had a reasonable opportunity to fix the situation. So far, I see no solutions, only PR spin. I'll give it a little more time as my account is not up right away, but if nothing changes soon I will be unsubscribing. "
The above is from another post I agree with 100 % but cant quoate . It wont let me quote so much stuff. So by your thought process Guard goons who collect isk in game and do it very well will be given 400 bil in stuff and trips to Iceland to auction. The sad part is the goons do it in game and I can at least shoot them while they are doing it. The more you try to defend your action the more it makes me sad. the other part is I cant type for shot and would love to have this discussion on Skype with you or eve radio. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3809
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:11:00 -
[243] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
"the time was right to do stuff with them" is extremely vague. What criteria was used in this case exactly?
What was SB's "great contribution" to EVE exactly, as referenced in the OP? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2668
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:13:00 -
[244] - Quote
StabThigh wrote:Is there no plan to repair the damage already done by giving a player corp trillions of isk worth of 'stuff'? Was that plan OK'd by multiple members of CCP management or was that idea dreamed up and pushed through by an isolated group?
A lot of players really feel cheated by this whole fiasco - not in the manner that we feel we are owed something(or even want anything -I sure as hell don't). We just want the illusion of fairness restored - I mean, what is the point of playing monopoly with your friends if the bank straight up gives the third player on your left 200 bones 'because that player was cool'. I can almost guarantee SOMER is looking at this thread and scratching his head wondering if the player base can count. If somebody hacked his account and stole "just" 100 IWSs worth of ISK he probably wouldn't notice for a long time, if at all. That's how far outclassed our wallets are by him. It's a non-factor. He hit the ludicrous ISK mark a long time ago. If he even does it for the ISK anymore it's only to see how crazy "crazy" can get.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Jassmin Joy
Oblivion Watch HYDRA RELOADED
194
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:14:00 -
[245] - Quote
I'm not sure why you dont just make more of those in-game cards you did for the NEO, I can say as a player who's names on an item in game i consider it to worth alot more than any IWS, You might be giving them billions of isk in ship, But they don't have an item in game that has their name on it, and wont ever be going away, that to me is a huge reward.
So there you go, create more "community spotlight" cards, mix them in with the NEO and give them to players through in-game and perhaps out of game events, Anyone who doesn't think that having an item in game forever with your name engraved into it is a reward that is literally priceless, probably doesn't deserve the reward imo. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4309

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:24:00 -
[246] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here. There was a limit on quotes allowed in the post, and I did my best to distill it down while maintaining the essence. If I misunderstood, please take the opportunity to explain rather than dismissing it outright. For that matter, there were several valid and salient points in that post, and you seem to casually ignore all of them. Care to try again?
Sure thing. Sorry if I came off as gruff.
You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time.
I see you obviously don't agree with that call or with the fact that SOMER or any lottery site deserves any attention. Not everyone will agree on that subject naturally. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:25:00 -
[247] - Quote
Gogela wrote: I can almost guarantee SOMER is looking at this thread and scratching his head wondering if the player base can count. If somebody hacked his account and stole "just" 100 IWSs worth of ISK he probably wouldn't notice for a long time, if at all. That's how far outclassed our wallets are by him. It's a non-factor. He hit the ludicrous ISK mark a long time ago. If he even does it for the ISK anymore it's only to see how crazy "crazy" can get.
tl;dr; what damage?
We're not looking at the value of isk related to Somer's assets, we're looking at the value of isk in relation to the reset of the playerbase, a good indicator of that value is in the value of plex. 1 plex represents a noticable 'chunk' of isk because the players have determined that that much isk is worth 1 month.
Now compare the amount of isk given to Somer to the value of that chunk.
That damage. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2670
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:32:00 -
[248] - Quote
StabThigh wrote:Gogela wrote: I can almost guarantee SOMER is looking at this thread and scratching his head wondering if the player base can count. If somebody hacked his account and stole "just" 100 IWSs worth of ISK he probably wouldn't notice for a long time, if at all. That's how far outclassed our wallets are by him. It's a non-factor. He hit the ludicrous ISK mark a long time ago. If he even does it for the ISK anymore it's only to see how crazy "crazy" can get.
tl;dr; what damage?
We're not looking at the value of isk related to Somer's assets, we're looking at the value of isk in relation to the reset of the playerbase, a good indicator of that value is in the value of plex. 1 plex represents a noticable 'chunk' of isk because the players have determined that that much isk is worth 1 month. Now compare the amount of isk given to Somer to the value of that chunk. That damage. If you are talking about the total "damage" to the eve economy, you haven't bothered to see what the isk traded per day in game is. Those IWSs are a drop in the bucket... and when that drop fell it didn't even cause a ripple.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:32:00 -
[249] - Quote
WHY wasn't this discussed during the AUG SUMMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This should have been agenda item one. If I was on the CSM and thank God I am not. I would have taken this as a direct breach of our white paper. You never informed the community supported body you were going to do this. Wait that's right the CSM had a member that already knew about this cause his friends already got a scorp worth billions while I was out running missions. Now I have to fight that isk in game and during the next alliance tourney. I see they run a fight league on the test server which has no barring on the real game of eve. So play on the test server and make isk on the real server, Run gambling site out of game make isk in the real server. I get it now don't play the real game of eve and CCP will give you billions.
Was supporting eve vegas that fricken important. That you wreck the integrity of the game and your company
How does giving isk to a third party for profit support a out of game gathering??? How do you convert auction isk into real money explain that to me. Did the rio take eve isk?????????????????
Somer Blink Made isk in the auction how did that pay for the events at vegas which require dollars??????????????
I am so confused and disconnected. So please keep up the white wash job I am just about done |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3809
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:34:00 -
[250] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here. There was a limit on quotes allowed in the post, and I did my best to distill it down while maintaining the essence. If I misunderstood, please take the opportunity to explain rather than dismissing it outright. For that matter, there were several valid and salient points in that post, and you seem to casually ignore all of them. Care to try again? Sure thing. Sorry if I came off as gruff. You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time.
This is what you said in that post:
CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few.
That is still vague and lacks specific details.
An "overall track record" of doing what exactly?
SB's capability of doing what exactly?
If by "niche", are you referring to their organization being a gambling operation, as opposed to say a fansite such as eve-files.com?
Do you truly consider SB to be a "fansite"?
You said those are a few, how about disclosing some more, that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:35:00 -
[251] - Quote
Gogela wrote: If you are talking about the total "damage" to the eve economy, you haven't bothered to see what the isk traded per day in game is. Those IWSs are a drop in the bucket... and when that drop fell it didn't even cause a ripple.
That is not what I am talking about - but if you'd like to continue this discussion my inbox is open to you. I'd like to hear what Guard has to say about several very pertinent and unanswered questions in this thread without mucking it up with side-discussions. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:36:00 -
[252] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here. There was a limit on quotes allowed in the post, and I did my best to distill it down while maintaining the essence. If I misunderstood, please take the opportunity to explain rather than dismissing it outright. For that matter, there were several valid and salient points in that post, and you seem to casually ignore all of them. Care to try again? Sure thing. Sorry if I came off as gruff. You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time. I see you obviously don't agree with that call or with the fact that SOMER or any lottery site deserves any attention. Not everyone will agree on that subject naturally.
Specifics would be a good place to start, something measureable, quantifiable. Something that can be held as a standard of measure to other sites/organizations. Otherwise, this award was purely arbitrary.
Any explanation as to why it was deemed acceptable to shift player traffic to one player organization's business and away from others would also be appreciated.
As would an explanation as to how the use of SOMER Blink, with their control over player participation as a prerequisite to participating in the giveway, was considered to be in line with CCP's previously stated policy of not engaging in community events in which participants could be excluded based on other players' whims. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Garandras
Black Aces Against ALL Authorities
14
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:50:00 -
[253] - Quote
I say give out in game prizes. they are kewl and are mainly just a epeen at any rate.
Somer Blink does make profit.. but they do it in a manner that is fun for the partisipants. I know I did enjoy a curier race that they hosted during their 1Q party.. there was no cost involed, you didnt actually needed to be registered on Somer Blink to participate, and everyone that finished got 25mil.. plus prizes for the winners..
People also keep throwing around this TRILLIONS!!! in prizes thing around when talking about the IWS' so they were valued at between 10-20bil a peice.. at 30 scorps that makes them valued as a group at around 600bil.. that is well short of the trillion mark.
I also wonder just how much Somer Blink actually does make per month.. I am guessing alot but I'm also thinking probally a fair deal less then most people are claiming.. Sure that make about 20% of each blink but when you fator in the Promo's and the rate that they pay their staff (which sits at about 30members) doing some quick rough math with the 20% figure.. you have their earnings sitting at about just over 24tril isk,
this figure in itself is inflated as it counts the value of promotinal prizes handed out aswell but keeping with that figure.. and the fact it has been running for 3 years.. thats 8Tril a year earnings before negating the cost of paying employees (say there is one person on 20hrs/day which makes it 657bil/yr plus adding in freight employee we will round to 1T) and promotional items (3.65T at roughly 10bil worth of promo giveaways a day)..
So at the end of that you have about 3.5T profit per year..
And while that is a larger number then most wallets it really isnt that big |

Disdaine
442
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:51:00 -
[254] - Quote
So how many GTC do I have to sell, and how many plex do I have to give back to the community out of my vast profits in the form of advertising and self promotion before I can be endorsed by CCP?
I'm offering a third party service in direct competition to Chribba and a CCP endorsement of being trustworthy would go a long way to helping me make more isk.
I'm fully prepared to donate hundreds of plex to player run activities and competitions so long as they loudly proclaim my involvement and make me seem more like a kind hearted philanthropist than an isk guzzling business.
Can someone at CCP please pm me the criteria I have to match to gain this most advantageous of references?
|

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1577
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 01:55:00 -
[255] - Quote
I still have issue with gifting anything to a RL business that is operating in game. Hell, I have issue with a RL business operating in game.
If SOMER's intent was to be a community fansite, they're no longer such. There should be a clear delineation between the two with strict rules of conduct. Frankly, I'm not excited that a for profit business is being 'gifted' anything, especially rare in game items.
Don't ban me, bro! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
193
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:01:00 -
[256] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few.
1. Timing really the summer summit was in AUG. you chose not to include the CSM in any of this WHY?????????????????????? Please give me a real answer for this. here is the answer Trebor gave me on the phone when this broke back in Sept. " This was the first we heard of this and we are pissed"
2. The one thing the CSM is charge with after the T20 crap and yet it never hit the agenda.
3. What amazes me is you guys have yet to post a single solution. All I keep hearing is we will work on that for the future.
4. Hell I had a friend who got hired by CCP and when he did he told me he could not be apart of DNS any longer. He then joined another group with some other memebers of DNS and I warned him this was a dangerous road to travel. I warned his friends who he was trying to remain with and play eve with this was a dangerous road to travel. This plus a number of other issues ended my friendship with him. He is still working at CCP and to this day doesn't speak with me. I am thankful for this cause of the reasons your somer blink issue of favortisum brings up.
5. I thank the eve gods everyday after I watched CCP presents from this year that Hilmar gets it. He mined trit during his childs first birth to replace a thorax of his corp mates he got blown up. If any one deserved to spawn a ship and benefit from their hard work for eve it was him but he didnt. this example should set the stage to how special this game is and no third party, corp or GOD himself should get any inside the sand box favors ever. If I have to earn it in game then so should those who I have to fight and that includes the fing ceo of CCP. |

Gamer4liff
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:04:00 -
[257] - Quote
knobber Jobbler wrote:CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members. How is it any different to running an alliance with forums, mumble, support services, politics, metagaming etc? It's creating content, takes work, gets in the news. I fail to see how you think it's at all defensible to give 1 person items which they can then sell and potentially do something like buy a small fleet of supercaps with. What would have CCP done if somer put those ships up for gambling, made a trillion profit off them at no loss to himself, then given it to say PL to go and evict an alliance from it's sov? 1 trillion would have covered all the losses from the fountain war on both sides. I'm gonna have to go ahead and quote this, as this is probably the hugest issue with this mess. I don't care how "neutral" parties look at times, there's no guarantee of anything. Isk is power here, and CCP has given gave Blink considerable power.
People need to re-read the above until it sinks in. This is the real problem with playing kingmaker. |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
447
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:12:00 -
[258] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
do they not have alarm clocks in your timezone? with all due respect, if you wanted them you'd log in and try and get them. if you chose not to participate; that's on you really. just like if you never turned up to whatever event it was they were giving away the noobships then you didn't have a right to moan about that one either.
They don't allow alarm clock responses at my WORK.
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
194
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:15:00 -
[259] - Quote
At some point you are going to wake up and realize what you have done and the damage you guys are causing. here is a good answer
1. We were wrong
2. We are sorry
3. We will be collecting all the scorps back or making them be bound to that charcter that got them so they cant enter the market place, so you dont have to fight CCP isk. We are sorry but we have to honor the free trips and bling from vegas and it wont happen again and we failed at truly supporting the sand box by favoring a single website that is trying to earn the same eve isk u are.
4. Any and all future give aways will be brought to the CSM first for review if we feel they are going to effect the integrity of the sandox.
5. If there is any eve player who has a gambling addiction we are sorry for endorsing a gambling site and compromising our integrity. We know some of you play online games to take the focus off of real life and our actions of being a service provider to that community was wreckless. In the past we have shown that we do not support in game and out of game actions and behavior by our players that can lead to real life problems. We as a company will hold ourselves to that same standard from now on.
Thank you
P.S. I could have gone on but will leave it at that
|

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
729
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:16:00 -
[260] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Kate stark wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
do they not have alarm clocks in your timezone? with all due respect, if you wanted them you'd log in and try and get them. if you chose not to participate; that's on you really. just like if you never turned up to whatever event it was they were giving away the noobships then you didn't have a right to moan about that one either. They don't allow alarm clock responses at my WORK.
INB4 accusation of not being hardcore enough because you won't miss workdays for pixel spaceship. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:27:00 -
[261] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
Are they still going to be giving away the prizes (SOE ships, Iceland Trips, etc) ? Shouldn't you rethink that entirely given the response?
What is so great about Somer other than they make a lot of isk in the game? How many devs have been Somer employees before working at CCP.
Frankly your response is inadequate, and raises a lot of questions about honesty and transparency.
I want to hear from Hilmar frankly, maybe he'll get it... |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:28:00 -
[262] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:At some point you are going to wake up and realize what you have done and the damage you guys are causing. here is a good answer
1. We were wrong
2. We are sorry
3. We will be collecting all the scorps back or making them be bound to that charcter that got them so they cant enter the market place, so you dont have to fight CCP isk. We are sorry but we have to honor the free trips and bling from vegas and it wont happen again and we failed at truly supporting the sand box by favoring a single website that is trying to earn the same eve isk u are.
4. Any and all future give aways will be brought to the CSM first for review if we feel they are going to effect the integrity of the sandox.
5. If there is any eve player who has a gambling addiction we are sorry for endorsing a gambling site and compromising our integrity. We know some of you play online games to take the focus off of real life and our actions of being a service provider to that community was wreckless. In the past we have shown that we do not support in game and out of game actions and behavior by our players that can lead to real life problems. We as a company will hold ourselves to that same standard from now on.
Thank you
P.S. I could have gone on but will leave it at that
+1 |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
447
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:28:00 -
[263] - Quote
Frostys Virpio wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Kate stark wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
do they not have alarm clocks in your timezone? with all due respect, if you wanted them you'd log in and try and get them. if you chose not to participate; that's on you really. just like if you never turned up to whatever event it was they were giving away the noobships then you didn't have a right to moan about that one either. They don't allow alarm clock responses at my WORK. INB4 accusation of not being hardcore enough because you won't miss workdays for pixel spaceship.
lol +1 from me.  CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

Molic Blackbird
Orion Faction Industries Orion Consortium
100
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:51:00 -
[264] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. That argument I would agree with in regards to certain rare items, but not the ISW as it was created for the express purpose of being a reward for all kinds of contributions and contests, making it inevitable that the price of the early ones will plummet. The problem more people would have with it is much rather that those who get it early gain more by selling it than those who get it late, which is a byproduct of slowly seeding rare items in this manner.
No, that was not the express purpose for why the IWS was created. As was stated in the first post, the IWS was created to be sold on the NeX store. I've seen several statements from CCP saying that community giveaways was the reason for the ship to exist all along. Is almost as if CCP is hoping that lie being told enough will make it become true.
When was the purpose of the IWS changed? If CCP had announced the change in purpose for the IWS ship ahead of being released in larger quantities, the price for the ship would never have been as high as it was nor do I think the outrage would have been as big. People were paying 30b from the start under the false assumption few additional ships would be added . If people knew CCP was planning on releasing 100's of the ship, the price would never have gotten over 10b. |

Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 02:59:00 -
[265] - Quote
In my opinion any fansite giveaway program has to include at a minimum:
1) Published guidelines used for selecting recipients, and 2) Most importantly, a published list of all in-game items given away.
Giving away plexes and swag is less problematic for me, if only because it's basically similar to the commissions for GTCs.
And you can't really use "we've been doing this for ages and no one's complained about it so far" as an excuse, since these giveaways haven't been very widely publicized. Other than, of course, events at cons and the Alliance Tournament. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:01:00 -
[266] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Mr Kidd wrote:I still have issue with gifting anything to a RL business that is operating in game. Hell, I have issue with a RL business operating in game.
If SOMER's intent was to be a community fansite, they're no longer such. There should be a clear delineation between the two with strict rules of conduct. Frankly, I'm not excited that a for profit business is being 'gifted' anything, especially rare in game items.
Yeah this. Wtf? Can I start a RL business in game and offer isk as a reward if people use my services out of game?
Agreed.
Does anyone at CCP get it? |

Sai Talos
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:24:00 -
[267] - Quote
Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators. |

Sai Talos
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:26:00 -
[268] - Quote
PS: When did we start looking to themittani.com as a source of credible space journalism? Jesus H Christ. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3811
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:37:00 -
[269] - Quote
Sai Talos wrote: They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK.
Such as?
Do you know what a Remora is?
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Callduron
Corporate Scum Northern Associates.
525
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:37:00 -
[270] - Quote
Total storm in a teacup.
CCP has done nothing wrong and I feel no respect at all for thin-skinned narcissists who get furious any time someone else gets something nice that they don't get.
I'd like to see CCP carry on supporting people who put exceptional effort into the community and if people feel bitter maybe they should consider putting in an outstanding contribution.
Full disclosure: CCP Guard gave me a 30 day new account code at the Feb London meet. Think I got a Quafe bag once too. Encouraging fans is just business sense and helps us fall in love with the game. CAOD: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest. |
|

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 03:53:00 -
[271] - Quote
Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators.
And in doing so, they raise visibility of their site, bringing in more customers and making themselves more ISK.
Sponsorship is not altruism, it is advertising. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Daenna Chrysi
Omega Foundry Unit Shadows Of Betrayal
84
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:00:00 -
[272] - Quote
I think the rewards should be non-transferable, and the list of them should be public. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:07:00 -
[273] - Quote
Sai Talos wrote:PS: When did we start looking to themittani.com as a source of credible space journalism? Jesus H Christ.
CCP and Somer both have confirmed the mittani story as accurate. So therefore in this regard it was credible...
In regards to "sponsorship" - it is called "advertising". Somer is not a "do gooder" group, they are in the game to MAKE ISK. They are no different than any other eve corporation that is MAKING ISK.
There is nothing WRONG with them (aside for the risks they create to the eve economy by concentrating large amounts of wealth should they ever release it all back into circulation) but they certainly do not do anything special for eve players.
CCP screwed up on this one, and they don't have the guts to really admit it and fix it.
People want a FIX, not lip service. Someone above Guard needs to handle this imo, as the devs who have handled it thus far seem to be in over their heads. If CCP goes through with the plan to use Somer to give away high value, out of game prizes, it will be proof they are clueless. The MMO market isn't that big, no MMO company can afford to ignore their player base. So even if not all players are upset - there are enough of us who are that CCP should take notice.
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:11:00 -
[274] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered. I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe. Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there. p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P
Let Somer sponsor whatever they want - doesn't mean that CCP should have a hand in hand relationship with them.
It's not about what Somer does, it's about whether or not CCP as the impartial entity that manages the game world should be basically in business with Somer.
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:17:00 -
[275] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. 1. Somer did not support any events the eve community and it players did by playing a out of game gambling lottery. 2. They used the profits the took as the house to gain your favor and then gain legitimacy as a trusted CCP site to further there ability to make more isk. 3. So is Somer Blink a CCP owned Fansite? If not they are in the sandbox and are now 100% CCP approved and that my friend is more valuable then any ship or ingame item. Every player of this game will see somer and in turn see CCP. I guess all we need now is a eve player who started playing eve to kick his gambling habit to start playing somer and commit suicide over losing all his isk and then blaming CCP. Then we will see how much support CCP wants to give somer. 4. Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? On and On In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy. And I know you are less than happy about the way this went down. I get that, the sandbox is sensitive and complex and we're going to be taking a careful look at how we step in it as we've said. Betting mechanics could be an interesting mechanic in the game but so far we haven't gotten around to prioritizing any such thing. Like with many other things, our community has beaten us to the punch.
Guard, the point is we don't ALL support Somer. We don't all believe in supporting Somer. Are you going to tell us all to f**k off?
CCP should stay out of the business of supporting ANY in game entity.
Anyway, this will be my last post on this - you clearly do not get it Guard, and its pretty sad. And you know what sucks, we as players don't have any recourse but to stop playing.
Keep telling everyone how awesome Somer is - I hope it doesn't come back to smack you in your face some day.
Maybe I'll go play Star Citizen, at least I already know those game developers are greedy bastards, lol.
o7 |

Montmazar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 04:56:00 -
[276] - Quote
Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators.
If Somer is paying X, Y and Z, and we think X Y and Z are great, then reward X, Y and Z directly. Paying Somer back makes no sense. And that's not even getting into the ludicrous concept of Somer sponsorships being something other than advertising.
In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
221
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 05:03:00 -
[277] - Quote
"This is a really unique thing CCP is doing that doesn't directly map to anything they have done in the past, and we don't want to mess up that future relationship."
That quote from Somer, combined with the overwhelmingly pro-Somer stance of the devs in this thread have me seriously questioning what the "relationship" is. And that's not rhetoric. |

Kate stark
585
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 05:30:00 -
[278] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Kate stark wrote:KIller Wabbit wrote:Is this review going to include the lack of opportunity for some time zones to participate in in-game events where items worth billions are "dropped"? I'm including both Dev roams and RP events.
do they not have alarm clocks in your timezone? with all due respect, if you wanted them you'd log in and try and get them. if you chose not to participate; that's on you really. just like if you never turned up to whatever event it was they were giving away the noobships then you didn't have a right to moan about that one either. They don't allow alarm clock responses at my WORK.
how are hours you choose to work, any of CCP's problem? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Molica Iwaira
Perkone Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 05:37:00 -
[279] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered. I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe. Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there. p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P
You are a great guy being here, listening and being involved. Thanks Guard! I think most every one is wondering how an "out of game" website can generate enormous amount of isk with "minimal to zero" in-game involvement when most everyone have to sweat their asses "in game" to make tiny bits of isk. Is this legitimate? Are you rewarding this? CCP who constantly nerfs, monitors, micro-manages the tiny bits in game so that people should not be making excessive isk and exploit anything...is actually rewarding this sort of money making?
Of course, this goes to other gambling sites as well. So people are naturally questioning CCP's sincerity in this. I know that CCP was complaining that there was too much isk in game. So is Somer Blink a back-handed operation to vacuum out the excessive isk from the game? You will hear all kind of such questions. Because you are spotlighting and rewarding "this way" of out of game isk making and people are rightly suspicious. |

Shai 'Hulud
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 05:40:00 -
[280] - Quote
I don't think any of us have a problem with you rewarding contributions to the community, but these rewards should be limited. I thought Chribba's ideas on this were more the types of rewards that would be appropriate for these types of gestures (or out of game rewards, or course).
But I don't like that you are acting like PLEX would be ok... that makes me think you still don't get it, CCP. Rewards of this type should be about recognition, NOT compensation. Replacing the gold magnate reward with a new unique ship only solved the threatened encroachment on EVE's history. It did nothing to prevent effective favoritism of a seemingly random gift. It scares me that you guys are just throwing around game wealth so whimsically. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |
|

Bi-Mi Lansatha
RillaCorp The Kadeshi
217
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 06:36:00 -
[281] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:...Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?.... Awards/Rewards given by CCP... out of game items only. Prizes won by players... in game items.
|

Morphisat
Millard Innovation Inc The 20 Minuters
37
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 06:46:00 -
[282] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:Morphisat wrote:This doesn't answer any questions at all. What ties does CCP have with Somer Blink ? First the weird community spotlight, then the lottery, followed by Billion isk ships. This has been asked several times since page 1, but it conveniently remains unanswered. I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe. Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there. p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P
I was talking about the Markee Dragon spotlight that came out of nowhere. In hindsight it was a setup for this blatent Somer Blink favouratism. Accuse me of tin foil hattery if you will, but I and a lot of other people have a feeling there is more to this than meets the eye.
I am very sorry to hear that you will keep exploring these 'relationships'. Knowing that CCP is heading in this direction has already caused me to log in less the past few weeks.
|

Prince Kobol
1038
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 06:50:00 -
[283] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators. And in doing so, they raise visibility of their site, bringing in more customers and making themselves more ISK. Sponsorship is not altruism; it is advertising.
Yet it is still a good thing, unless you are saying that the 100 of billions isk they have used in sponsoring player driven events was worthless and that they should stop? |

JohnnyRingo
Perkone Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:07:00 -
[284] - Quote
Honestly, in my opinion, i have no problem with you guys giving away ingame items as long as they give no ADVANTAGE over other items and or ships, i mean if someone wants to pay 15 billion isk for a reskinned scorpion that is worse than a normal scorpion then that is HIS CHOICE. |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:28:00 -
[285] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself?
Montmazar wrote:In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense.
*sigh*
CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law.
Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should.
Greed is good.
CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2454
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:32:00 -
[286] - Quote
So CCP directly, secretly, and personally spawn ships that are known to be worth around 20bn isk each for a bunch of their favourite people and then after the fuss says "well no one else is going to get the same handouts because we're putting that little policy on hold"
Unsubbing because this is even worse - and sadly, it was predicted. Somer got their massive cash influx, and no one else is going to get the same. Thanks CCP. Great.
|

Gysele
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:33:00 -
[287] - Quote
Somer Bink is the largest scam site of Eve and CCP doesn't even see it.
People playing think its fair. You can even calculate Somers share of ISK for each lottery, which is fine.
What people don't see is that Somer Bink can buy tickets on their own lotteries thus skewing the ratios and maximizing their profits.
As this can't be tracked by outsiders without knowing accounts from CCP's database this ISK printing will go on forever, now even officially approved by CCP.
So here we have it. CCP supports scammers, even awarding them for their genius. Next time someone gets banned for scamming he should mention why Somer bink isn't shut down. |

Cierra Royce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
76
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:40:00 -
[288] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. This pretty much exactly, the reward of being recognized and in a way immortalized with the items you have, or monuments, or even names of planets etc is one of the best ways to show appreciation. Things like that would be worth so much more in terms of memories and feeling accomplishment than a regular item you sell for some ISK. I've been joking since years that my personal ultimate goal would be to have a planet named after me, and I'm sure that alot of people who dedicate themselves making things to try and improve and build the community (not for profit only) would feel very rewarded by things like that. /c
I'm sorry Chribba, but you shouldn't have a planet named after you, planets are big boring, no one pays attention to them really.
Instead there should be one of those huge asteroid colony models spawned in Ammar with a globally warpable beacon, let's call it 'Old Chribba's Claim' and put a whole bunch of l1 & l2 agents there for the various mining corporations, with the immense help you have given to the community at large over all these years I think it's only fair you get a proper thank you.
One of the things I enjoyed most about eve, when starting out, was the monuments and the stories behind them. This is a persistent world and we are the content, if there is to be any in game reward for in game actions outside the tournament then it should be in the form of monuments to the events those players took art in or inspired.
You do raise the perfect point though, there a tens, possibly hundreds of thousands of planets, moons, stars in game, all with very boring names, these also are ripe for CCP to do a little renaming.
I won't add any comments on blink or the hidden and open giveaways, I've said more than enough and others are saying the right things here, and I think you guys are listening now. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2454
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:40:00 -
[289] - Quote
I also fail to see any kind of response to the fact that Somer ban people at their own discretion, which excluded paying subscribers who have done nothing wrong (by any of CCPs own rules or standards) from partaking in the contest.
Neither have I seen any kind of response to the fact that Navigator made claims about them being 100% legitimate and honouring everything perfectly. Do CCP have access to somers code and services, have CCP performed a thorough investigation and audit into the services and every single transaction? If not then Navigator needs to publicly apologise and correct his statements. |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
854
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:52:00 -
[290] - Quote
Oh Yeah??!!
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|
|

Balthazar Lestrane
Fallen Supremacy SCUM.
71
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 07:56:00 -
[291] - Quote
What the flying ****. Stop giving **** out to people outside of the game and you won't have any problems.
1. Blink is an enabler for an addiction, gambling. I don't care if it's not real-life money, it doesn't mean it isn't an issue. I am sure there are plenty of addicts out there who buy PLEX to gamble away on Blink but again, it's kind of irrelevant. Stop supporting unhealthy behaviors. There's a reason gambling is illegal in Iceland, no? Supporting the community with gambling? What? That only supports your wallet, CCP, nothing else.
2. Giving things away to third parties shows favoritism. What conditions were these given to blink? For them to give away? For them to keep? There's still a massive lack of transparency about why this happened and what the intended goal was. They support the community? So do I, so do a plethora of other pilots. Where are our special edition ships? Has EN24 gotten anything? Or TheMittani.com? They're bad sites but all the same they support the community. Lack of transparency.
More importantly, we support YOU, CCP, by playing your game, living in this universe. I constantly defend your actions (even when I don't agree with them :cough cough DUST cough cough: because I have faith in your ability to keep this universe alive. You continuously give me reason to not give a damn or even care anymore about what happens to EVE. The skill renaming was something that bothers me still, not to mention the constant rebalancing that has taken the place of real, actual new expansion content though Rubi is a step in the right direction to mitigate this).
3. If you want to continue with this whole giving back bullshit you claim to be doing, you NEED to announce these things and you NEED to do it in advance or people will continue to be pissed when they find out 2 weeks later that ships that are supposed to rare are being given out for literally no reason other than to support third parties that are not always supporting players in a healthy way.
Giving out rare ships like this DEVALUES them. This is why all those Tech 1 Faction Exploration Frigates (Sarum Magnate, Inner Zone Imicus, etc.) are worthless. Stop. Doing. This. You're making ownership of these special ships/items meaningless for people who would fly them or collect them.
Balthazar out. :throws mic over shoulder:
|

Kalindra Chan
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:01:00 -
[292] - Quote
Balthazar Lestrane wrote:What the flying ****. Stop giving **** out to people outside of the game and you won't have any problems.
1. Blink is an enabler for an addiction, gambling. I don't care if it's not real-life money, it doesn't mean it isn't an issue. I am sure there are plenty of addicts out there who buy PLEX to gamble away on Blink but again, it's kind of irrelevant. Stop supporting unhealthy behaviors. There's a reason gambling is illegal in Iceland, no? Supporting the community with gambling? What? That only supports your wallet, CCP, nothing else.
2. Giving things away to third parties shows favoritism. What conditions were these given to blink? For them to give away? For them to keep? There's still a massive lack of transparency about why this happened and what the intended goal was. They support the community? So do I, so do a plethora of other pilots. Where are our special edition ships? Has EN24 gotten anything? Or TheMittani.com? They're bad sites but all the same they support the community. Lack of transparency.
More importantly, we support YOU, CCP, by playing your game, living in this universe. I constantly defend your actions (even when I don't agree with them :cough cough DUST cough cough: because I have faith in your ability to keep this universe alive. You continuously give me reason to not give a damn or even care anymore about what happens to EVE. The skill renaming was something that bothers me still, not to mention the constant rebalancing that has taken the place of real, actual new expansion content though Rubi is a step in the right direction to mitigate this.
3. If you want to continue with this whole giving back bullshit you claim to be doing, you NEED to announce these things and you NEED to do it in advance or people will continue to be pissed when they find out 2 weeks later that ships that are supposed to be rare are being given out for literally no reason other than to support third parties that are not always supporting players in a healthy manner.
Giving out rare ships like this DEVALUES them. This is why all those Tech 1 Faction Exploration Frigates (Sarum Magnate, Inner Zone Imicus, etc.) are worthless. Stop. Doing. This. You're making ownership of these special ships/items meaningless for people who would fly them or collect them.
Balthazar out. :throws mic over shoulder:
couldn't have said it any better!
I'm a trap! |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
588
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:03:00 -
[293] - Quote
Please never stop the Community Spotlights!
Many people are not that active in the forum and just read the dev blogs. With out those spotlights they would miss many community events and organisation that make eve a better place! German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:07:00 -
[294] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe. Regarding the rewards specifically, we've said we'll reconsider our approach there. p.s. What was weird about the Community Spotlight? :P
Yes betting sites, drinks companies, clothing companies and many other types sponsor teams, but the organisers of these events not also go and hand them money back, also why do you think they sponsor these teams and events ? To get more revenue in by advertising.
What Somer brings to the eve universe is dubious as to what I can see they actually encourage people to not play eve but gamble on a website only needing to log in to transfer isk over, the website does nothing else apart from give links where people can buy a plex so they can transfer more isk over.
Dotlan, eve-mon, e-fit and a huge amount of other sites actually benefit players.
Is it a case that CCP wanted to say thanks to Somer for getting people to buy plex's and make them RL money, then again what a strange gift, you make me RL money and i will hand you something which costs me literally nothing to give you, no effort on my part or anything indeed special about it as others have them, least making a medal and handing them to whoever was deemed to of deserved it would be special to them, but instead you give something which will add billions out of thin air and effect others ingame as well. If you really thought the players would like Somer to get all this for what they do for content then why did you tell them to keep it quiet ? Don't take this as a knock on Somer, they work hard and run a great buisness, but so do a whole host of other ingame entities but don't get mixed up with giving sponsorship and creating content, one is advertising and the other is organising a event, the Syndicate racing league or whatever it's called adds content, whoever sponsor's it doesn't.
Is very simple, CCP should not favour one ingame group over another, it is unfair to anyone else who has really added content, also though I am not a supporter of them but one word to the CSM about it would of made the concerns known and adverted all of this why weren't they consulted ? The CSM came about so you had a group of plyers you could get the opinion of. Items given free by CCP to say thanks should be personal to those people and non-transferable items not items which effect other players ingame by gifting people multiple billions in assets.
Mra Rednu, Proud holder of a Kourmonen medal given for adding content in FW which is non transferable and worth jack-**** ( which is how it should be :P ) |

Ra Jackson
the unified Negative Ten.
244
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:17:00 -
[295] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
They are good at relocating ISK. That's about it. In this spirit you could give every relevant scammer a rare ingame ship. |

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:23:00 -
[296] - Quote
I'd like to register my corporation as an entity that adds valuable content and provides an entertaining experience for the general Incursion community. I'll take free accounts for me and my corporation, a Revenant BPO, an Etana BPO, or a Basilisk BPO, whichever is more convenient for you.
/troll |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1302
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:31:00 -
[297] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Tinman Spectacular wrote:Some people have already mentioned this idea, and it's been done before. Immortalize individuals and corporations with permanent relics and monuments in-game as reward for their community contributions. You like what Somer is doing, why not a "Somer Gambling Hall" off Dodixie Fed Navy? You want to give credit to their members, let people warp to it and buy junk items like "1 blink credit - issued by [somer employee]." Like someone said, it's no different than "piece of steve," etc. Even better, let them name their junk item with your final approval. CCP gets an ISK sink. Somer employees get a very VERY special in-game achievement, and players get something to do other than buy a passport from Poitat. This would be an achievement most of us will never accomplish because of what they've done for the community, respect or hate it, their name will be remembered even after they unsub and nobody gets a tangible ISK advantage over anyone either directly or indirectly. I get that a couple billion ISK to outfits like Somer is just a rounding error, but it's still an in-game advantage. I also get ships and junk have been given before, so what? Things change in this game. -RvB gets some magical kill number in their eternal war, how about a flaming statue named after the pilot who died or something? -Some event attracts 10k people in local with super duper reinforced nodes, maybe they'll get a station named after them in that system? -How about an item for sale at SOE stations called "A Map of Eve - by Dotlan"? It's not that hard. Nobody will have a problem with this. The player is immortalized and the community gets FREE content; free as in I'm not paying $14/mo for in-game corps to get marketable items which benefit them in some tangible, non-existential manner, that may or may not be used against me. For comparison, for most players their corporate titles and medals are more meaningful and treasured than ISK gifts and their equivalencies (rare items and such). Usually you get them for spectacular in-game feats, or spectacular in-game failures. It's hard to say which kind is more regarded by the individual they were conferred upon  Definitely one route we can take! And it's a cool one. Doesn't have to be the only one though. Also since we discussed "soulbound" items (heh I said this word on the EVE forums), medals for example are essentially that by default. Again...not the only thing we should look at. We should look at a lot of different things. This isn't a bad idea, BUT you'll run into similar issues...
Like take this "scandal" for example, if CCP "spawned" a structure instead, you will still have another group of players getting upset because stuff they did wasn't also recognized. There's groups of them still upset because certain stuff/events wasn't immortalized.
Also, ingame monuments...for example...would take resources from other projects to complete. Artists and Programmers, who's time would be better spent fixing stuff, instead of giving someone a shiny.
If a ingame shiny was to be given to a group, it's rarity makes it valuable. If you give this to everyone, then they're immortalized and the shiny, is still shiny, but worthless.
I'd still suggest that players who done stuff for the community that CCP feels that they need to be rewarded, should be, sadly others will take offense/jealous and will cause a stink. ESP if a shiny that just so happens to be worth alot of ISK.
In this situation, I would've suggested an ingame medal, and a dev blog. The community gets another little item in the random items handed out that will sit beside A Piece of Steve.
I know that there's some random ships that's in the database that CCP would love to hand out. Why not hand them out during live events? Like dev roams would contain 1 BPC of said ship they want to give out. OR, entrants to tournaments. Or smaller tournaments, like Frigs only tournament? Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

Lina Thamaris
Vicis Inter Astrum Solar Destiny
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:33:00 -
[298] - Quote
I think there's nothing wrong with CCP giving out rewards to players who "do good for the community". I actually prefer you giving them in-game items with no "real" value than PLEX, which has a very real value. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6150
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:42:00 -
[299] - Quote
I'm just going to quote myself from another thread since it says pretty much everything I want to say:
James Amril-Kesh wrote: What most people seem to misunderstand about this issue is that our grievance here predominantly lies not in the nature of the gift itself, nor in the recipient. The most significant problem with what has happened here is twofold:
First, CCP's awarding of these gifts to SOMER Blink was in complete secrecy. While this may not have been CCP's intent, they certainly never made any effort to tell anyone else that they did this. Considering the nature of the gifts involved this amounted to a substantial amount of ISK directly in the wallets of SOMER's employees.
Second, there was (and still is) no defined criteria for reward selection. CCP has stated previously that they wish to reward players and player groups for excellent community services rendered. Nobody disputes that CCP has a right to reward anyone they wish, for whatever reason. However, picking a massively profitable lottery site (yes, with some philanthropic contributions) over the vast number of other groups that have rendered significantly more popular and useful services (Chribba, EFT, EVE-kill, EVEMon/Battleclinic, etc.) suggests that the criteria used in this case was little more than "we like Blink a lot. We should give them stuff."
While this is less important than the other two points, I strongly urge CCP to look into creating items that have significant sentimental value, but not necessarily the kinds of items that can be sold on market or that would have particularly high ISK value. This may have been what CCP intended when they repurposed the SIW, but they should have carefully noted market values and realized just how much ISK they were handing Blink when they gave them the SIWs. But I'm thinking more along the lines of statues that the awardee could have placed in a certain location, much like the monument in Jita originally intended as a tribute to the winners of a riddle challenge several years ago.
Long story short: most dissenters are likely to agree that we would all prefer that any items given away have reasonable ISK value or cannot be sold for ISK, that CCP should create and publish a set of well defined criteria for such rewards, and that when CCP selects a certain group or person to receive such rewards they make an announcement detailing why this person or group deserves these rewards
EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

Laughing Mime
Stormblessed Bandits
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:47:00 -
[300] - Quote
I've decided not to resubscribe my two accounts.
CCP still don't see what is wrong with financially supporting a for-profit gambling site.A casino is not a community service. They support SOMER purely because they drive GTC purchases.
You pissed in my sandbox CCP, I'm moving to another playground. |
|

Morphisat
Millard Innovation Inc The 20 Minuters
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:50:00 -
[301] - Quote
Ra Jackson wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. They are good at relocating ISK. That's about it. In this spirit you could give every relevant scammer a rare ingame ship.
Yeah following that logic, I am good at shooting sleepers in a C2, can I haz spaceship plz.... |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2460
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:50:00 -
[302] - Quote
Also going to echo what a lot of people have pointed out: A for-profit organisation giving money to an event in order to raise their visibility is not a community service. It is a business investment. Somer is a business, it is not a community service. Some of it's business decisions may result in 'good' things, but that doesn't make it a charitable organisation or community service. It is still a business.
One which excludes people at their own discretion.
And one which Navigator has unjustifiably claimed is completely honest.
These are bad bad bad things |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6152
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:54:00 -
[303] - Quote
Most importantly, I should say this:
CCP should never give any in-game entity a gift, under this type of promotion, which would incur a significant financial, political, or strategic advantage.
Suddenly being gifted half a trillion ISK in assets is a significant financial advantage, no matter how you slice it. EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
588
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:54:00 -
[304] - Quote
Laughing Mime wrote:I've decided not to resubscribe my two accounts. When do they run out?
Laughing Mime wrote: CCP still don't see what is wrong with financially supporting a for-profit gambling site.A casino is not a community service.
But where do you draw the line? If someone makes ISK by being a 3rd party on Super Traiding and sponsors community events to get more known, is that also "bad"? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
240
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:58:00 -
[305] - Quote
Zoe Armageddon wrote:PLEX is a pretty safe and stable straight gift, especially given the total existing PLEX vs. the rate of gift giving, it would have no measurable or detectable impact on in-game economy and also represents a pretty predictable and comprehensible value, even if players openly brag about it. "It's just a plex, big deal, anyone can get one". Unless you are specifically talking about 1 PLEX I don't agree. I'm not sure why many people seem to think PLEX are different than any other item. If each Somer employee had gotten 20b in PLEX it's just as bad as the 20b in IshuScorps they got. In fact even worse cause the chance that they don't trade off the PLEX for ISK is even smaller.
So the only thing better about PLEX is that 1 of them has a smaller value than 1 of any rare give-away. But it's still an in-game item with in-game value. I would agree though that 1 PLEX is probably not enough to have a serious effect on anything, however 1 PLEX is also not a very impressive reward for a 3rd party dev.
Quote:But if you want something really clearly visible, such as a skinned ship, I would suggest one of two things. Either you make the ships unsellable, or (my preference) you make the skin an effect that appears on a normal ship, attached to the player, with their option to disable it if they want. So the dudes flying around in BRIGHT SHINY GOLD MYRMIDONS or something, everyone can see right away that they got recognition, but, otherwise it's just another ship-in-game. The side benefit is the player won't be afraid to actually fly that ship since the effect could show up for any new replacement they had to buy as well. This is an incredibly cool idea. I thought about it and there are even ways to make this system useable both for transferable, limited-use skins (e.g. Quafe Catalyst) and for non-transferable, unlimited-use skins (IshuScorp), but I don't wanna bloat this thread anymore with off-topic details.
Gogela wrote:I can almost guarantee SOMER is looking at this thread and scratching his head wondering if the player base can count. If somebody hacked his account and stole "just" 100 IWSs worth of ISK he probably wouldn't notice for a long time, if at all. That's how far outclassed our wallets are by him. It's a non-factor. He hit the ludicrous ISK mark a long time ago. If he even does it for the ISK anymore it's only to see how crazy "crazy" can get.
tl;dr; what damage? Why do you think it matters how big Somer's wallet is? If a trillion ISK is relevant or not in-game is decided by everyone's wallet, not by the richest guy's wallet. It has been said many times that the trillion ISK Somer received in the 2 give-aways combined could fund a major nullsec war for quite some time. It does not matter at all if Somer could do this with his own ISK (because that's legitimate sandbox stuff), it matters that CCP doesn't hand anyone the opportunity to do so.
Sai Talos wrote:PS: When did we start looking to themittani.com as a source of credible space journalism? Jesus H Christ. I guess since they reported about stuff that turned out to be true? AFAICS everything they reported about this story turned out to be true and was confirmed by all involved sides, so what exactly is your problem with their reporting? |

Laughing Mime
Stormblessed Bandits
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 08:58:00 -
[306] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Laughing Mime wrote:I've decided not to resubscribe my two accounts. When do they run out? Laughing Mime wrote: CCP still don't see what is wrong with financially supporting a for-profit gambling site.A casino is not a community service.
But where do you draw the line? If someone makes ISK by being a 3rd party on Super Traiding and sponsors community events to get more known, is that also "bad"?
I'll tell you how much time left when i check tonight.
I get you, there are definitely ambiguous cases, this is not one of them. Wherever you draw the line, a casino is not a community service. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
240
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:02:00 -
[307] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:But where do you draw the line? If someone makes ISK by being a 3rd party on Super Traiding and sponsors community events to get more known, is that also "bad"? It's not "bad", just as running a gambling business is not "bad". However both are in-game businesses and as such should not receive in-game support from CCP.
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6152
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:04:00 -
[308] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Sai Talos wrote:PS: When did we start looking to themittani.com as a source of credible space journalism? Jesus H Christ. I guess since they reported about stuff that turned out to be true? AFAICS everything they reported about this story turned out to be true and was confirmed by all involved sides, so what exactly is your problem with their reporting? "Grrrr Goons" is their problem. EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

l0rd carlos
Friends Of Harassment
588
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:05:00 -
[309] - Quote
Laughing Mime wrote:a casino is not a community service. I see it more as a entertainment service, you pay money and get a adrenalin kick out of it.
But, yeah. I get what you mean. But they did not get the price for being a gambling site, they did because they give out money to Video Makers, Podcast, Tournaments and RL meetups.
If they did not get any advertisement in return, would that have been ok? German blog about smallscale lowsec pvp: http://friendsofharassment.wordpress.com |

Laughing Mime
Stormblessed Bandits
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:10:00 -
[310] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Laughing Mime wrote:a casino is not a community service. I see it more as a entertainment service, you pay money and get a adrenalin kick out of it. But, yeah. I get what you mean. But they did not get the price for being a gambling site, they did because they give out money to Video Makers, Podcast, Tournaments and RL meetups. If they did not get any advertisement in return, would that have been ok?
CCP should support those Video Makers, Podcast, Tournaments and RL meetups, not barely EVE related gambling sites passing off a minute amount of its profit to "charities".
Its blatantly obvious CCP are doing this for the GTC sales generated through SOMER's website. |
|

Molica Iwaira
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:14:00 -
[311] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators. And in doing so, they raise visibility of their site, bringing in more customers and making themselves more ISK. Sponsorship is not altruism; it is advertising. Yet it is still a good thing, unless you are saying that the 100 of billions isk they have used in sponsoring player driven events was worthless and that they should stop?
You cannot seriously assume that people are too naive to ignore that 100 of billions can be easily sacrificed as a facade for an operation which might be bringing 1000s of billions. You sound like an insider or an associate Kobol. How much are they making - say - a month? |

Arcueid Saber
Legio XCIX CA
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:19:00 -
[312] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
In my opinion, this thinking is very offensive because you discarded 3rd party non profit services such as skill planning, ship fitting, mapping, pos planning etc that help EVE players since day one.Without these services, do you really think an in game tournament will go smoothly if SOMER (a "I quit EVE, send ISK and i will double it" scam) sponsors it? Did SOMER sponsor the Fountain war or the 4000+ battle that scored CCP some press time?
In your OP, you forget to address the CCP "Seal of Approval" with in game for profit services or groups, |

Diva Ex Machina
D'reg The Methodical Alliance
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 09:48:00 -
[313] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do.
Quote:I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.
These justifications for supporting Somer Blink are very vague and totally out of proportion with the sheer size of the kickback they received: a community spotlight, a CCP Dev recommendation for being an honest and legitimate Eve entity, 30 Ishkone Scorpions and a bunch of valuable prizes (in and out of game) which earned them yet more ISK, reputation, site traffic and real world cash from GTC sales than the massive amounts they were already getting.
I suspect the real reason is that Somer Blink brings CCP a lot of business in the form of GTC sales. People buy GTCs via Somer to get credits to gamble with on their site. In turn, I'm sure many convert the time codes to PLEX which they sell on the market for ISK to then turn back into Somer credits to fund more gambling. The amounts of money that Somer Blink brings to CCP must make such perks seem quite reasonable in the minds of both parties but to outsiders it can look rotten and corrupt.
It certainly seems more than mildly dodgy to me. Unfortunately I paid up my sub many months in advance so I can't 'vote with my wallet' as I'd really like to do, since reading all of the Dev posts thus far in this thread have only convinced me that you've shut the gate after the horse has already bolted. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2461
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:03:00 -
[314] - Quote
I mean that's basically it in a nutshell, isn't it? Somer exploits gambling addictions in a fashion that result in CCP gaining money through GTCs. That's why they got all these special prize items to give away despite unfairly controlling who can enter, that's why they got unjustifiable claims of complete honesty from CCP employees, that's why they were chosen over countless other community-supporting individuals and groups.
It's rather nasty to have to point that out so bluntly, but that's what it is and we all know it. |

Nanatoa
315
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:16:00 -
[315] - Quote
As I said in the Assembly Hall, CCP should at least publicly disclose anything valuable or rare they spawn ingame, if only to make sure the market remains transparent and efficient.
Now, as for the Gold Magnate bait and switch, I'm still waiting for SOMER Blink to return my 16 billion. Posts in their thread have been ignored and ingame messages to Somerset Mahm had no effect, but I still like this organisation with "a solid history of trust and reliability" [CCP Navigator's endorsement, not mine] to honour my refund request. How do I go about this? "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
57
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:17:00 -
[316] - Quote
I can see why CCP would want (to be able) to reward effort in regards to advancing the community or giving the game as a whole more "air time", the problem I have with it all (and I'm fairly sure others will feel the same about) it are the following.
- it was given to Somer who's drive is of course a monetary one and as such their "effort" isn't aimed at advancing the community or the game itself, it's aimed at increasing their wallet and influence. Anyone with a brain sees through their "charity" and recognises it for what it is; more advertising and a simple ingame isk investment to gain more RL revenue because of plex sales
- As such ANY help/reward given to an entity like that will autmatically result in a red flag, we're fine with CCP helping or rewarding people who actually DO help the community but anything that sounds fishy, well... you know what will happen
- it was done in secrecy, your "but we've been giving them out before and all the participants knew about it" means nothing because all you're saying is "yes we kept it quiet but the ones we let in on it were of course part of the conspiracy". Not saying that's truth but perception is reality, especially because of uhm ...."previous issues in regards to CCP spawning items for certain players"
- It wasn't announced such a program exists although I can understand the logic of not wanting to advertise it as that would create a precedent, still something should have been stated in advance. The CSM wasn't informed nor asked for their opinion.
- these "gifts" are simply too valuable, I don't care about your "but they refine to nothing". They get value through scarcity and quite a bit of it too
So I'm pissed because you gave it to the wrong party, in the wrong manner and the wrong amount of value. But I'm even MORE pissed about the fact that the one who makes these decisions didn't see these issues themselves, before hand. That tells me said person(s) either lacks any real understanding of EVE and its history or they just don't give a fck. Not sure which is worse. |

Warde Guildencrantz
TunDraGon
921
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:31:00 -
[317] - Quote
why do people even care about this? play the game. It's just more expensive ships that you can kill if people let you, not like anyone ever uses them anyways. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2464
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:40:00 -
[318] - Quote
Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions. |

Jori McKie
Friends Of Harassment
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 10:48:00 -
[319] - Quote
I think the best course for rewards would be
Ingame items: Only worthless but special stuff like the cards you gave out for the 10th anniversary, any kind of vanity stuff.
Out of game items: Fanshop stuff
To avoid that already given out rare items stay rare or even increase in value like the IWS make them available for every player as christmas or anniversary gifts.
|

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
116
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:25:00 -
[320] - Quote
If you want to give away free stuff like the ships given out by SOMER create a lottery or some other way yourself so "EVERYONE" can have a chance at winning these ships. SOMER might be popular to those that like to gamble or just have isk to be dumb with but not everyone does. I must of also been an idiot cause I heard there were free blinks to get in on to get a ticket in for the stuff but never did find that so never got a chance to play and possibly win something. (Not going to give them my hard earned isk to play in a 3rd party website for profit)
Transparency for the IWS but other than that I couldn't care less for them getting those ships. Giving ships to fansites that way doesn't bother me at all but like I said up above:
Don't let fansites run promotions like that where you have to spend isk to even have a chance! |
|
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4317

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:29:00 -
[321] - Quote
Molic Blackbird wrote:CCP Guard wrote:iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. That argument I would agree with in regards to certain rare items, but not the ISW as it was created for the express purpose of being a reward for all kinds of contributions and contests, making it inevitable that the price of the early ones will plummet. The problem more people would have with it is much rather that those who get it early gain more by selling it than those who get it late, which is a byproduct of slowly seeding rare items in this manner. No, that was not the express purpose for why the IWS was created. As was stated in the first post, the IWS was created to be sold on the NeX store. I've seen several statements from CCP saying that community giveaways was the reason for the ship to exist all along. Is almost as if CCP is hoping that lie being told enough will make it become true. When was the purpose of the IWS changed? If CCP had announced the change in purpose for the IWS ship ahead of being released in larger quantities, the price for the ship would never have been as high as it was nor do I think the outrage would have been as big. People were paying 30b from the start under the false assumption few additional ships would be added . If people knew CCP was planning on releasing 100's of the ship, the price would never have gotten over 10b.
In this dev blog prior to Fanfest 2012, we announced that the ISW was not exclusive and would evntually be made available to everyone eventually:
"This leads on to another question, does this mean we will be seeing ship skins for sale in the NeX store or by some other method? That is currently not the plan and is not in development so the short answer is no. The Ishukone Scorpion was already created as the first prototype and Game Design plan to release it to everyone at some stage." CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Lukas Rox
Aideron Technologies
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:29:00 -
[322] - Quote
Jori McKie wrote:I think the best course for rewards would be
Ingame items: Only worthless but special stuff like the cards you gave out for the 10th anniversary, any kind of vanity stuff.
Out of game items: Fanshop stuff
To avoid that already given out rare items stay rare or even increase in value like the IWS make them available for every player as christmas or anniversary gifts.
I agree. Especially with the last point - I'd really love an IWS in my ship collection ;-) Blogging about EVE on http://pozniak.pl/ |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4482
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:31:00 -
[323] - Quote
tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6153
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:33:00 -
[324] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
Yes, EVE is fair. Why shouldn't it be? Would you want to play air hockey with the table tilted towards you? EVE Online - A Rigged Game |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1302
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:43:00 -
[325] - Quote
Is it just me, or am I the only one noticing a running theme here?
A group of people isn't allowed recognition because they run a 3rd party site. But, another group who fought battles and waged wars and massive organized ganks. Which was organized by a groups personal agenda in game, just so happend to get media attention. CCP needs to kiss their ass at every waking moment? Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4483
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:50:00 -
[326] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
Yes, EVE is fair. Why shouldn't it be? Would you want to play air hockey with the table tilted towards you?
Yes, and I have. It's even more satisfying to win against tilted odds.
These freebie ships have no value other than what people decide to perceive. They don't unbalance the mechanics of the game the way tilting an air hockey table would.
EVE is all about reaping rewards for your actions. You kill a ship, you get isk. You complete a mission you get LP. You conquer a region you get its moons.
...and if you create a popular community site that creates content and gives back support to others in the EVE community, you might get a trinket from CCP. Good for them for having the drive to do it and succeed at it, and good for CCP for rewarding these kinds of organizations.
It's too bad they feel they had to stop because other people have more desire to tear down than build.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Azami Nevinyrall
Carbon Circle Tactical Narcotics Team
1302
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:55:00 -
[327] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
Yes, EVE is fair. Why shouldn't it be? Would you want to play air hockey with the table tilted towards you? Yes, and I have. It's even more satisfying to win against tilted odds. These freebie ships have no value other than what people decide to perceive. They don't unbalance the mechanics of the game the way tilting an air hockey table would. EVE is all about reaping rewards for your actions. You kill a ship, you get isk. You complete a mission you get LP. You conquer a region you get its moons. ...and if you create a popular community site that creates content and gives back support to others in the EVE community, you might get a trinket from CCP. Good for them for having the drive to do it and succeed at it, and good for CCP for rewarding these kinds of organizations. It's too bad they feel they had to stop because other people have more desire to tear down than build. Excuse me while I quote a perfect piece of common sense... Support my (possibly dumb) Ideas!! Worm Rebalance!!! |

Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 11:59:00 -
[328] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
Yes, EVE is fair. Why shouldn't it be? Would you want to play air hockey with the table tilted towards you? Yes, and I have. It's even more satisfying to win against tilted odds. These freebie ships have no value other than what people decide to perceive. They don't unbalance the mechanics of the game the way tilting an air hockey table would. EVE is all about reaping rewards for your actions. You kill a ship, you get isk. You complete a mission you get LP. You conquer a region you get its moons. ...and if you create a popular community site that creates content and gives back support to others in the EVE community, you might get a trinket from CCP. Good for them for having the drive to do it and succeed at it, and good for CCP for rewarding these kinds of organizations. It's too bad they feel they had to stop because other people have more desire to tear down than build.
And by "support" you mean "give away ingame isk (of which they havr too much of) to gain back RL revenue due to plex sales", of course. |

Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
858
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:01:00 -
[329] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:
...and if you create a popular community site that creates content and gives back support to others in the EVE community, you might get a trinket from CCP. Good for them for having the drive to do it and succeed at it, and good for CCP for rewarding these kinds of organizations.
It's too bad they feel they had to stop because other people have more desire to tear down than build.
Are you talking about SOMER Blink (However its spelt)?
'creates content' dont make me laugh, the only reason the Blink site was set up is to make the owner ISK, and possibly RL $$$ via PLEX sale endorsements (also do they have advertising on their site???? I dont know).
This is not a site that has been built and maintained 'for the good of the Eve community'
Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2469
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:36:00 -
[330] - Quote
CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? |
|

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
9295
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:43:00 -
[331] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between
you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Twitter: @EVEAndski
TheMittani.com: The premier source for news, commentary and discussion of EVE Online and other games of interest.-á |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:46:00 -
[332] - Quote
Yes, it is so terribly criminal and BadGäó to want to make money.
Fake money. In a game.
Um... shame on them?
And what was their reward? Fake spaceships. In a game. Shame on CCP?
Everyone raise your hand if you've never wanted to make any isk. Keep your hand up if you gave away all the isk you ever accidentally made in order to preserve your holier-than-thou image. Anyone with a hand still raised, congratulations on being better than the rest of us playing Eve. You can claim the moral high ground in this "oh noes, they made a profit" discussion.
Again, more whining about people with the motivation and ability to make something happen from those without either.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
210
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:47:00 -
[333] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy
Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first.
1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit.
2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled?
When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire.
Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2469
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:50:00 -
[334] - Quote
No one is arguing against somers - or anyone elses - ability to try and make a profit. That is basically what this entire game is about - ruthless space capitalism.
What we object to are the creators of the game unfairly and arbitrarily stepping in and granting their personal favourites massive advantages to their business or massive personal rewards for succeeding in the game.
That is not how ANY competitive game should ever work. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:51:00 -
[335] - Quote
Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~
Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league.
I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

KuroVolt
The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance
901
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:53:00 -
[336] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first. 1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit. 2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled? When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire. Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis. The vibe I got from this post:
Guess who DNSBLACK is in this.
Ill give you a hint, hes BLACK. BoBwins Law: As a discussion/war between two large nullsec entities grows longer, the probability of one comparing the other to BoB aproaches near certainty. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2469
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:56:00 -
[337] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league. I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another.
There are plenty of other for-profit gambling organisations within EVE, there are plenty of groups who organise pvp events. There are plenty of groups who do not organise events but sponsor them. And so on and so forth.
These other ones were not given the same massive boost to what their businesses can offer (i.e. special ships) and were not given direct personal wallet lining gifts (again with special ships).
So claiming "other people can do it" seems a bit empty when other people HAVE done it but haven't been treat the same way.
To resort to just claiming it is "jealousy" is rather childish. It isn't "jealousy" to expect a level playing field in a game |

knobber Jobbler
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
292
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 12:58:00 -
[338] - Quote
Callduron wrote:Total storm in a teacup.
CCP has done nothing wrong and I feel no respect at all for thin-skinned narcissists who get furious any time someone else gets something nice that they don't get.
I'd like to see CCP carry on supporting people who put exceptional effort into the community and if people feel bitter maybe they should consider putting in an outstanding contribution.
Full disclosure: CCP Guard gave me a 30 day new account code at the Feb London meet. Think I got a Quafe bag once too. Encouraging fans is just business sense and helps us fall in love with the game.
OK, so think about this: What happens if this had taken place in say June and Somer decided to keep all the profits of the ships it was given for its gambling site, and then say gave all those proceeds to an entity you were fighting at that time? Lets say it was 800b ISK to be on the safe side.
There is nothing wrong with encouraging community sites, as long its fair and balanced. However its pretty well known that CCP has a clique of community sites and anyone outside that gets nothing. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:01:00 -
[339] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:No one is arguing against somers - or anyone elses - ability to try and make a profit. That is basically what this entire game is about - ruthless space capitalism.
Yes they are. The words "For profit" are creeping into many arguments as if it was an evil thing.
Quote: What we object to are the creators of the game unfairly and arbitrarily stepping in and granting their personal favourites massive advantages to their business or massive personal rewards for succeeding in the game.
How is it unfair and arbitrary? CCP has explained a couple times why they rewarded the SCL and SOMER employees with these fake spaceships with different paintjobs.
Success breeds success and should be rewarded.
Failure shouldn't be rewarded or subsidized. That just encourages more failure. (Welfare anyone?)
Random lotteries shouldn't be the way to recognize people - does anyone think Joe Schmoe who got his name picked out of a hat is worthy of a reward? No - he just got lucky. Nobody gives a damn.
Success is what should be recognized and rewarded.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
116
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:02:00 -
[340] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league. I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another. Really the jealous reason is old and tired.. |
|

Molic Blackbird
Orion Faction Industries Orion Consortium
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:02:00 -
[341] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:In this dev blog prior to Fanfest 2012, we announced that the ISW was not exclusive and would evntually be made available to everyone eventually: "This leads on to another question, does this mean we will be seeing ship skins for sale in the NeX store or by some other method? That is currently not the plan and is not in development so the short answer is no. The Ishukone Scorpion was already created as the first prototype and Game Design plan to release it to everyone at some stage."
Saying it will be made available to everyone is a very vague statement. Putting on the NeX store would still have made it available to everyone. Also, that statement was made over a year before the IWS was released in greater numbers. Plans change at CCP all the time without any way to know about them. There was no way to know if that was still the plan for the IWS or not. Lastly, a few select community members would not qualify as 'everyone'. |

Frying Doom
2586
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:03:00 -
[342] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league. I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another. Yes it is a form of Jealousy.
Players are jealousy guarding a game that some people have invested years in that some organisations have thousands of pilots collected together in.
What you don't seem to realise or care about is the fact that one organisation was favoured over all most all of the others in EvE and given ships capable to be sold on for hundreds of billions. If we followed that path then what happens if TEST or the Goons start sponsoring in game events for the whole player base and not just their own members?
Would it then be OK for CCP to give PL half a trillion when they started a war, if they had previously sponsored community events?
Yes people are jealous, they are jealous of losing the player driven sand box and the competition it stands for. After all why would anyone want to compete in a sandbox where CCPs flavour of the month suddenly gets a massive injection? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2470
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:04:00 -
[343] - Quote
It's rather sad to see the only defense of this boiling down to "you're just jealous because you didn't get stuff!!!"
That's not quite how it works, my dears. Lets imagine we're playing the ol' classic game Counter Strike. Lets say you start your first round, and the admin gives the other team AK47s, while your team are stuck with the pistols.
If you speak out against the admins actions, would it be fair to scream "you're just jealous you didn't get them!"? No, of course it wouldn't. It isn't jealousy, it's about balance and fairness. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:04:00 -
[344] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:War Kitten wrote:Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league. I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another. There are plenty of other for-profit gambling organisations within EVE, there are plenty of groups who organise pvp events. There are plenty of groups who do not organise events but sponsor them. And so on and so forth. These other ones were not given the same massive boost to what their businesses can offer (i.e. special ships) and were not given direct personal wallet lining gifts (again with special ships). So claiming "other people can do it" seems a bit empty when other people HAVE done it but haven't been treat the same way. To resort to just claiming it is "jealousy" is rather childish. It isn't "jealousy" to expect a level playing field in a game
You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.
Trophies for everyone!
That would be meaningful.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
210
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:06:00 -
[345] - Quote
KuroVolt wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first. 1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit. 2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled? When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire. Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis. The vibe I got from this post: Guess who DNSBLACK is in this.Ill give you a hint, hes BLACK.
Thank you for making me smile. I guess the irony in this video is this; my only ability to kill them is by canceling my accounts in the only money making game CCP has created in the last 10 years. But since they seem to do stuff so willy nilly and think this practice of knocking down the fourth wall of the sand box is ok then maybe it is time to kill them and hope another steps up in its place. Does any one have a link to star citizens development page? |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2472
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:09:00 -
[346] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.
Trophies for everyone!
That would be meaningful.
That's not what I said at all. Creating strawman arguments just makes you look like a troll.
You claimed anyone could do this and get the same 'reward' - and I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things. That is me demonstrating that your statements are false.
Please be mature |

Kalindra Chan
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:09:00 -
[347] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:It's rather sad to see the only defense of this boiling down to "you're just jealous because you didn't get stuff!!!"
That's not quite how it works, my dears. Lets imagine we're playing the ol' classic game Counter Strike. Lets say you start your first round, and the admin gives the other team AK47s, while your team are stuck with the pistols.
If you speak out against the admins actions, would it be fair to scream "you're just jealous you didn't get them!"? No, of course it wouldn't. It isn't jealousy, it's about balance and fairness.
exactly!
@ War Kitten: to your comment why we dont run a website like Somer blinks lottery by ourselfs? Because we want to play EVE Online in that said sandbox and not administrating some website!
I'm a trap! |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:11:00 -
[348] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:War Kitten wrote:Andski wrote:War Kitten wrote:tl;dr:
A bunch of whiny "adults" complained something in life isn't fair. CCP puts on hold a cool reward program until definition of fair can be determined. Whiny adults continue to whine because they are whiners.
Get over it people, life isn't fair, EVE isn't fair.
HTFU.
eve is quite fair, actually: any advantage a player has over any other player is within the reach of any player, with exceptions few and far between you're just trying to be the ~contrarian~ Creating a for-profit gambling website is also within reach of any player. So is organizing a competitive combat league. I'm not being contrary for the sake of contrariness. I truly think people are up in arms over nothing and at the root of most all of the complaints is jealousy in one form or another. There are plenty of other for-profit gambling organisations within EVE, there are plenty of groups who organise pvp events. There are plenty of groups who do not organise events but sponsor them. And so on and so forth. These other ones were not given the same massive boost to what their businesses can offer (i.e. special ships) and were not given direct personal wallet lining gifts (again with special ships). So claiming "other people can do it" seems a bit empty when other people HAVE done it but haven't been treat the same way. To resort to just claiming it is "jealousy" is rather childish. It isn't "jealousy" to expect a level playing field in a game You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation. Trophies for everyone! That would be meaningful. You are reaching with your trolling now.. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2472
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:11:00 -
[349] - Quote
Additionally, why can't the "meaningful" rewards be ones that don't give a direct in-game advantage over other players?
How about a non-transferable t-shirt for your char that has "SOMER" stamped on it? How about a USB rifter hub?
You understand that rewards can be meaningful and fair at the same time, yes? |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:25:00 -
[350] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:War Kitten wrote:You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.
Trophies for everyone!
That would be meaningful.
That's not what I said at all. Creating strawman arguments just makes you look like a troll. You claimed anyone could do this and get the same 'reward' - and I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things. That is me demonstrating that your statements are false. Please be mature Regardless of anyone else doing this in the past or future.. Items should not be given out as a promotion on their site like that.. If they are doing a fanfest or something of the like then CCP can be like sure we'll give you this item(s) to give out to such and such.. but don't give them the ones running the event the items.. Have the event runner tell CCP who won the item at their event and then CCP contract/give the item to the winning person.
Yes there could be some collusion at a fanfest meeting or whatever. But given that this is taking place where the people are actually gathering the likely hood of that is a little smaller because if you screw someone over they could start a mob and burn the place down or you get the crap beat out of you.. |
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:26:00 -
[351] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Additionally, why can't the "meaningful" rewards be ones that don't give a direct in-game advantage over other players?
A scorpion... marginally useful by itself....with lesser stats than other scorpions.... and a fancy paintjob. Oh big in-game advantage there.
The only value is the rarity, and that's a value that can be made liquid and useful a few times only. Once the collectors have the 1 they "NEED" for their collection, who else is that ship worth billions of isk to really?
The Mona Lisa is valuable because there is one of it. 132 exact duplicates of the Mona Lisa are not worth 132x as much as the one Mona Lisa.
Quote: How about a non-transferable t-shirt for your char that has "SOMER" stamped on it? How about a USB rifter hub?
You understand that rewards can be meaningful and fair at the same time, yes?
An out of game reward can be sold on ebay and turned into plex too. What's the difference?
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:33:00 -
[352] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:War Kitten wrote:You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.
Trophies for everyone!
That would be meaningful.
That's not what I said at all. Creating strawman arguments just makes you look like a troll. You claimed anyone could do this and get the same 'reward' - and I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things. That is me demonstrating that your statements are false. Please be mature
It's not a straw man if you present the same argument again in your reply.
TheGunslinger42 wrote: I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things.
That right there is exactly what I'm replying to.
"We made a website too, where's our free stuff?"
"We played football too, where's our trophy for participating?"
You have to win.
You may not know ahead of time what the criteria is for winning in this case, but I guarantee you it doesn't include whining about the others who have won.
Relevant.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3822
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:35:00 -
[353] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You are misquoting me. My reply wasn't to that post as can be seen here. There was a limit on quotes allowed in the post, and I did my best to distill it down while maintaining the essence. If I misunderstood, please take the opportunity to explain rather than dismissing it outright. For that matter, there were several valid and salient points in that post, and you seem to casually ignore all of them. Care to try again? Sure thing. Sorry if I came off as gruff. You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time.
This is what you said in that post:
CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few.
That is still vague and lacks specific details.
An "overall track record" of doing what exactly?
SB's capability of doing what exactly?
What niche exactly are you referring to?
Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"?
You said those are a few, could you please disclose some more, any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:37:00 -
[354] - Quote
I'm disappointed to see that it still seems as if CCP does not 'get it'... we don't want you giving stuff to people in-game that gives them any kind of advantage... the SIW is worth what it's worth because of it's rarity, if you look at the sell history people are clearly willing to pay huge amounts for it, even now. It doesn't matter if it only refines to 1trit if it can be easily converted to a t2 bpo or a supercap hull. Also, that thing about the SIW being announced to be a promo item... yeah, that was vaguely worded, over a year ago, and doesn't excuse handing out a full 33% increase in supply to one entity in complete secrecy, enabling them to engage in insider trading. Also, the response the what qualified Somer to receive so many handouts is evasive... we want better answers than they do cool stuff.... what were the exact criteria? Also, why do people keep forgetting about the monocles they also recieved? those are also selling for billions of isk... so that would make somer the recipient of 3 different handouts, a spotlight, and seemingly offical dev endorsement of legitimacy? show me on other entity receiving that kind of attention please. better yet, show a non-profit entity receiving anything close to that. all those handouts totalover 1tril in profit for somer easily. and all given in dubious circumstances. i'm sorry, but it still doesn't smell right to me.
Edit: oh, and one more thing... why would you give 15bil ships to individual corp members... who are only doing their jobs? they joined the corp to make easy isk, they get paid per hour as well as plex. they definitely do not join somer's corp to donate to charity, lol, they are already being rewarded through the insane profits blink makes and the compensation somer provides. devs are way out of line giving them all those free ships to do shady deals with. somer runs a purely for-profit corp, there is no charity in his actions, sponsoring anything is only marketing/advertising, not an altruistic action. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
212
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:45:00 -
[355] - Quote
"GM Nythanos wrote: Warnings include information stating that additional violations can lead to further action being taken up to and including a permanent ban if violations continue to be committed, such as: "Please refrain from such activities in the future or we may take further action against your account, up to and including a permanent ban."
The other option is that we don't inform a player that additional action may be taken for future violations and just act if they continue but that's hardly ideal for anyone. It's better to let players know that they need to stop such activities since if they don't we may have to take additional action beyond warning them.
If a player receives a warning and has questions or concerns regarding it they are welcome to file a ticket and we can assist them with the matter accordingly."
LOL This is Irony and I think this is what the eve player base is telling you CCP community team. |

Kalindra Chan
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:51:00 -
[356] - Quote
The moment has come...
Thank you CCP for taking away my motivation to play Eve Online!
Somer blink actually cannot be blamed, because it is CCP alone allowing their lottery business.
I dont care about the few thousand dollars i put into plexes and collector editions..
The thing what makes me very sad is, that you took away the joy i had playing eve, which is.. i mean was such a great universe for a virtual life.
I know nobody cares, just wanted to let you know CCP and maybe i am not the only one... :( I'm a trap! |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:52:00 -
[357] - Quote
CCP Guard did you really say those ships were worth 30 trit?
Frankly Somer has conquered this game more than anyone else to date.
1) He has raked in isk from players in game hand over fist, God knows how much he has now.
2) He has strategically sponsored events to advertise his lottery service, so he can get more people on his website losing all their isk and not enjoying it in game, and as a reward CCP print him out a 300b isk prize (no not 30 trit Guard).
3) He has all the top names vouching for how great his lotteries are, and even has CCP tirelessly asserting, again and again, and even in this thread, how great his service is to this game.
Nice work.
Time to quit eve I suppose. There is only so much insult to my intelligence I can stomach. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:57:00 -
[358] - Quote
Kalindra Chan wrote:The moment has come...
Thank you CCP for taking away my motivation to play Eve Online!
Somer blink actually cannot be blamed, because it is CCP alone allowing their lottery business.
I dont care about the few thousand dollars i put into plexes and collector editions..
The thing what makes me very sad is, that you took away the joy i had playing eve, which is.. i mean was such a great universe for a virtual life.
I know nobody cares, just wanted to let you know CCP and maybe i am not the only one... :( you aren't the only one... i already let several accounts lapse due to this and am still debating what to do with the others as they come up for renewal. unfortunately, i do have to keep 2 accounts up for another month due to some in-game business (i keep my word, not gonna leave people holding the bag like CCP does), but depending on how this turns out, i may just let everything expire once that business is taken care of.
at the very least, i expect a complete halt in the issuance of SIW... not just a temporary stop... i'm talking a full, we're done, the units in game will be the only units in game type of deal. if you want to resume in the future, you do it with a new ship skin and announce it clearly and well ahead of time so that we don't have another situation with insider traders taking advantage of a falsely reported supply to sell their dev-spawned items for top dollar. of course, the truly correct thing to do would be to remove the 30 units given to somer from the game and reverse transactions on any of those issued that have been sold through dishonest means. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
213
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 13:58:00 -
[359] - Quote
Kalindra Chan wrote:The moment has come...
Thank you CCP for taking away my motivation to play Eve Online!
Somer blink actually cannot be blamed, because it is CCP alone allowing their lottery business.
I dont care about the few thousand dollars i put into plexes and collector editions..
The thing what makes me very sad is, that you took away the joy i had playing eve, which is.. i mean was such a great universe for a virtual life.
I know nobody cares, just wanted to let you know CCP and maybe i am not the only one... :(
DNSBLACK wrote:"GM Nythanos wrote: Warnings include information stating that additional violations can lead to further action being taken up to and including a permanent ban if violations continue to be committed, such as: "Please refrain from such activities in the future or we may take further action against your account, up to and including a permanent ban."
The other option is that we don't inform a player that additional action may be taken for future violations and just act if they continue but that's hardly ideal for anyone. It's better to let players know that they need to stop such activities since if they don't we may have to take additional action beyond warning them.
If a player receives a warning and has questions or concerns regarding it they are welcome to file a ticket and we can assist them with the matter accordingly."
LOL This is Irony and I think this is what the eve player base is telling you CCP community team.
I guess your reponse to this crisis has reached the community GM desk and they are beginning to wiegh in. Hey have you ever heard of the butterfly effect let me link a cool video this company named CCP uses http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08hmqyejCYU
By the way Iam being a smartass no if and or buts about it |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:02:00 -
[360] - Quote
Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Kalindra Chan wrote:The moment has come...
Thank you CCP for taking away my motivation to play Eve Online!
Somer blink actually cannot be blamed, because it is CCP alone allowing their lottery business.
I dont care about the few thousand dollars i put into plexes and collector editions..
The thing what makes me very sad is, that you took away the joy i had playing eve, which is.. i mean was such a great universe for a virtual life.
I know nobody cares, just wanted to let you know CCP and maybe i am not the only one... :( you aren't the only one... i already let several accounts lapse due to this and am still debating what to do with the others as they come up for renewal. unfortunately, i do have to keep 2 accounts up for another month due to some in-game business (i keep my word, not gonna leave people holding the bag like CCP does), but depending on how this turns out, i may just let everything expire once that business is taken care of. at the very least, i expect a complete halt in the issuance of SIW... not just a temporary stop... i'm talking a full, we're done, the units in game will be the only units in game type of deal. if you want to resume in the future, you do it with a new ship skin and announce it clearly and well ahead of time so that we don't have another situation with insider traders taking advantage of a falsely reported supply to sell their dev-spawned items for top dollar.
I agree. CCP are trying to claim what was given was worth 30 trit / nothing. it was worth 300b isk. And we are all paying for this game and deserve a better account than this. They simply dont want to face up to the train wreck that this is.
I am the same as you. I used to have multiple accounts but I have honestly let them all lapse apart from my main due to the constant having to stomach this kind of nonsense. If anyone from CCP doesnt believe me... check my account history. |
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1429
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:07:00 -
[361] - Quote
To those who say they are going to or may quit, I would ask them wait to see what CCP do about this...error of judgment.
Those of us who are opposed to the favouritism are against it precisely because we really care about and enjoy Eve Online, where success or failure is fought for (by whatever means) on a level playing field, where the same rules apply to all.
The likes of War Kitten and Jenn Aside et al, who constantly try to portray opposition to valuable/useful in-game freebies, as a jealously issue, simply serve to help me realize that as bad as I am at Eve, they are worse. This is not a signature. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:13:00 -
[362] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To those who say they are going to or may quit, I would ask them wait to see what CCP do about this...error of judgment.
Those of us who are opposed to the favouritism are against it precisely because we really care about and enjoy Eve Online, where success or failure is fought for (by whatever means) on a level playing field, where the same rules apply to all.
The likes of War Kitten and Jenn Aside et al, who constantly try to portray opposition to valuable/useful in-game freebies, as a jealously issue, simply serve to help me realize that as bad as I am at Eve, they are worse. well, i am still here because i am giving CCP a chance to make it right, i'm just not feeling so optimistic after reading the replies in this thread that display lack of understanding of what is upsetting people. and no, i'm not jealous of the ships... i own one myself, and it wasn't spawned for me, it's one of the first run units that was handed out at the tourney. even if it were to completely lose all value, it wouldn't destroy my wallet or assets list, but that's not the point. the point is i actually had to work for my isk to be able to acquire one, and i didn't have any insider info to help me sell at an inflated price either. the devs giving somer the ships directly impacts my gameplay in that it devalues my items and gives me competition. if that is going to be the case, why would i want to bother doing things to earn isk when others are getting their stuff for free? |

T1nyMan
Interstellar Solutions Agency
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:15:00 -
[363] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Kalindra Chan wrote:The moment has come...
Thank you CCP for taking away my motivation to play Eve Online!
Somer blink actually cannot be blamed, because it is CCP alone allowing their lottery business.
I dont care about the few thousand dollars i put into plexes and collector editions..
The thing what makes me very sad is, that you took away the joy i had playing eve, which is.. i mean was such a great universe for a virtual life.
I know nobody cares, just wanted to let you know CCP and maybe i am not the only one... :( you aren't the only one... i already let several accounts lapse due to this and am still debating what to do with the others as they come up for renewal. unfortunately, i do have to keep 2 accounts up for another month due to some in-game business (i keep my word, not gonna leave people holding the bag like CCP does), but depending on how this turns out, i may just let everything expire once that business is taken care of. at the very least, i expect a complete halt in the issuance of SIW... not just a temporary stop... i'm talking a full, we're done, the units in game will be the only units in game type of deal. if you want to resume in the future, you do it with a new ship skin and announce it clearly and well ahead of time so that we don't have another situation with insider traders taking advantage of a falsely reported supply to sell their dev-spawned items for top dollar. I agree. CCP are trying to claim what was given was worth 30 trit / nothing. it was worth 300b isk. And we are all paying for this game and deserve a better account than this. They simply dont want to face up to the train wreck that this is. I am the same as you. I used to have multiple accounts but I have honestly let them all lapse apart from my main due to the constant having to stomach this kind of nonsense. If anyone from CCP doesnt believe me... check my account history.
Paranoia is a ***** isn't it... Must be tough living with it.
Not once has guard said it was worth one trit. They have a refine value of one trit. He was speaking to the initial design of the item.
But I am seriously wasting my time here I can see. Hopefully though those that aren't so silly might see some benefit from it. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:22:00 -
[364] - Quote
T1nyMan wrote:
Paranoia is a ***** isn't it... Must be tough living with it.
Not once has guard said it was worth one trit. They have a refine value of one trit. He was speaking to the initial design of the item.
But I am seriously wasting my time here I can see. Hopefully though those that aren't so silly might see some benefit from it.
when i read the first responses on TCM and that other gaming site, they pretty much said them item is worth 1trit, lol.
and we've already established the original design of the item was for the Nex store and rest is just retconning on CCP's part |

Molica Iwaira
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:22:00 -
[365] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:To those who say they are going to or may quit, I would ask them wait to see what CCP do about this...error of judgment.
Those of us who are opposed to the favouritism are against it precisely because we really care about and enjoy Eve Online, where success or failure is fought for (by whatever means) on a level playing field, where the same rules apply to all.
The likes of War Kitten and Jenn Aside et al, who constantly try to portray opposition to valuable/useful in-game freebies, as a jealously issue, simply serve to help me realize that as bad as I am at Eve, they are worse.
Well, as much good intentions as CCP Guard has, I have noted that he is exclusively focusing on what CCP has to give to whom as rewards, awards etc. As important as this is, some of us are also discussing the legitimacy of the 3rd party gambling websites which is extremely disturbing. We are still worlds apart in understanding I am afraid. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
241
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:23:00 -
[366] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP Guard did you really say those ships were worth 30 trit?
Frankly Somer has conquered this game more than anyone else to date.
1) He has raked in isk from players in game hand over fist, God knows how much he has now.
2) He has strategically sponsored events to advertise his lottery service, so he can get more people on his website losing all their isk and not enjoying it in game, and as a reward CCP print him out a 300b isk prize (no not 30 trit Guard).
3) He has all the top names vouching for how great his lotteries are, and even has CCP tirelessly asserting, again and again, and even in this thread, how great his service is to this game.
4) He has so much power that if he did pull a massive scam out of his operation, it would literally probably feature in headline world news, would also deal a massive gut blow to CCP and all the other fools that have promoted him, and might just bring the whole game crashing down.
Nice work.
Time to quit eve I suppose. There is only so much insult to my intelligence I can stomach.
Honestly any dev or CCP employee who continues to attempt to argue their point based on the fact that the IWS is "not very good" or only "refines to 30 trit" is a complete and utter idiot and deserves to be fired. And that is NOT rhetoric .
How you can be expected to solve problems when you can't even understand the problem, despite it being defined for you about a hundred times over is beyond me. This is favoritism - you screwed up. The response is to fix it, not to continue your ridiculous attempts to defend it.
1) Remove the Somer ISW scorps from the game pending a decision on how best to reward players. You halting of giving them out has just increased the incentive for selling them. At the very least, render them "unsellable"
But more importantly:
2) Cancel any involvement with SOMERblink and CCP on out of game and in game projects. The raffles/giveaways at EVE Vegas should be handled by CCP themselves or the EVE Vegas staff. If there is a need to have a third party handle this, I am sure the casino (a totally impartial, well established third party entity) might be able to be of assistance if you explain what you need. It's just a raffle.
3) At this point I am afraid there needs to be a full investigation into SOMERblink and any involvement that devs may have had with them past or present. I would like to see someone like outside of the community team and suitably high up the chain of command such as Jon Lander, David Reid, or someone else well trusted by the player community to handle this.
A CCP dev has come out and pronounced SOMER has trustworthy, but this goes beyond simply paying off bets. As any intelligent person would know, to declare them trustworthy would also mean assuring there are no shills used, that their payouts are c/w with odds, and most importantly that none of the isk that they pay to themselves or their employees is used in ways that violate the EULA.
4) We need some promises from CCP, once again from higher up than the dev team, that they respect that players want CCP to keep its meddling hands out of the economy and in game player interactions and that they will no longer try and pick winners. If they want to reward genuine out of game sites, then they should do so with out of game prizes like USB hubs and ship models and the like.
So let's be clear:
It isn't just about ISW Scorps, it isn't just about raffles. It is about the fact that SB is an in game corporation, that makes isk IN THE GAME. They exist within the context of the game, and therefore CCP should be impartial and unbiased towards them (as they ironically chose to be toward new player training organizations, lol).
They have literally no credentials that we have seen or been presented with that make them in some way well suited to giving away out of game, taxable prizes like trips to iceland. They can only profit from this arrangement. So CCP has engaged in an out of game relationship with an in game corporation that will increase their profit making.
Does this really need to be made any clearer? A goddamn monkey could understand the conflict of interest here and yet we have thus seen three CCP devs come to us who have shown an inability to "get it".
So yes - stop insulting our intelligence. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:31:00 -
[367] - Quote
He said Somer deserved 300b for getting players to lose all their isk on his website, and has along with most of ccp persistently held somer out to be 'great' and a 'content provider'.
Its pure garbage. Might be good enough for you, not for me.
And yes, if you read Guards original post, he did throw around '30 trit' as being one way to view the value of the ship. He also tried asserting it is worthless by saying the ship is not as good as a tech 1 scorpion, totally ignoring the collectors / rarity value. The reason for this is because they are trying to hide the 300b bit.
If you can stomach garbage arguments then good for you.
CCP gave Somer Blink 300b isk. The only thing more tragic than this is that CCP cannot pry themselves away from promoting Blink and holding it out as being a really great service that adds content.
Question for CCP: Do you really think players losing isk to Somer qualifies as 'content'?
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
242
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:34:00 -
[368] - Quote
Pingu wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? Montmazar wrote:In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense. *sigh* CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law. Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should. Greed is good. CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them.
Can SOMERblink legally give away prizes that have real cash value in the "real world"? These items are subject to taxes in the United States and there a ton of laws regarding their distribution that already potentially being violated. Frankly I am surprised any US based member of SOMER would want the attention because if they are paid enough game time/isk as 'payment in kind' it also could be subject to taxes (although I admit I am not an accountant, so correct me if I am wrong).
Why not have the casino help run the lottery for the items? They can legally raffle off whatever they want, and have actual "out of game" credentials to do so. Or why not the EVE Vegas folks themselves.
The point is, CCP screwed up bad by getting into bed with SOMER and the only acceptable course of action is to get out. Going ahead with this lottery through SOMER, is a bad path to go down. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1431
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:39:00 -
[369] - Quote
I am not convinced that CCP being involved with a 3rd party gambling site for a game 13 year old kids can play is the best move they have ever made.
However, it seems that CCP is going to look at all aspects of this, so all may change in the near future. This is not a signature. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:46:00 -
[370] - Quote
There is so much sense being spoken in this thread, and I just cant stop thinking about the audacity of CCPs '30 trit' gambit.
I agree with Argus Sorn and Josef Djugashvilis 100%, and many others that have posted I have not named.
Another Question for CCP (bet they dont answer): Why are you pushing online eve gambling so hard? |
|
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4321

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:53:00 -
[371] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc?
We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

jimbolina
TheDarkLegion Inc
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:54:00 -
[372] - Quote
So, You are stopping this madness and making those ships even more valued. Congrats CCP ( or i missed line where they took all those ships back?) |

Nanatoa
323
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 14:57:00 -
[373] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer
That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence. "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:02:00 -
[374] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide.
CCP keeps calling what they are providing 'support'.
CCP gave hundreds of billions of unique (and spawned out of thin air) ships to Somer Blink in support of what? It was in support of online gambling in eve.
So why does Guard avoid answering my question.
Q: Why does CCP want to support online gambling in eve with free assets and extensive vouching? |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:07:00 -
[375] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide.
I can draw your line for you.
CCP on one side. SOMER on the other. Don't cross it.
It isn't that hard, businesses have to draw these kind of lines all the time to avoid conflicts of interest, why are you having such a hard time?
And how do you plan on addressing this concern in time for EVE Vegas to make sure everyone has a fair opportunity to enter, because otherwise such arbitrary banning of participation might not only create discontent among the player base, but it may not even be legal given the Vegas 'lotteries' are for prizes with real cash value? The fact is SOMER is not necessarily equipped to do this fairly.
Once again, I have your answer, since CCP seems to struggling with it.
CCP | SOMER
Don't cross the line.
|

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:07:00 -
[376] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
SOMER - not a fansite, not a community site, do nothing for the community other than as advertising to bring in more revenue to SOMER, already unbelievably isk-rich - why, why, why would you ever think they deserved anything from CCP to help them?
This stinks of favouritism and your responses stink of covering up as you (CCP as a whole) continually imply they do good for the community without any evidence whatsoever other than the obvious point that you think they're great.
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:14:00 -
[377] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide. CCP keeps calling what they are providing 'support'. CCP gave hundreds of billions of unique (and spawned out of thin air) ships to Somer Blink in support of what? It was in support of online gambling in eve. So why does Guard avoid answering my question. Q: Why does CCP want to support online gambling in eve with free assets and extensive vouching?
To be honest I have thought about this quite a bit and have come to only one conclusion that doesn't involve outright misconduct by CCP employees. Despite my stance on this issue, I generally do not subscribe to the "cheating dev" theory. I have met Guard, for instance and think he's a great guy. I don't believe he is guilty of misconduct. I just think, and I am sorry for this Guard, that he's a little too emotionally attached to SOMERblink, either because of a love for SOMER or because of an attachment to their decision and an inability to admit they made a mistake.
So that all being said, there is one answer that doesn't involve misconduct and makes sense:
SOMERblink, either knowlingly, or more than likely unknowingly (because he hires CCP dev alts without knowing it) is literally removing isk from the game. They are taking it, and destroying it. This would actually be supportive of the economy believe it or not. So yeah, CCP supports the removal of isk from the game because it prevents inflation in the economy, and that's good for the game.
The problem is, if that isk isn't being destroyed, but instead is being hoarded somewhere, if it is released in a large amount into circulation, it could have terrible consequences in terms of inflation.
CCP has basically chosen to support SOMER as a sort of Federal Reserve, which is only safe and reasonable if CCP knows that they are permanently removing isk from circulation. |

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:17:00 -
[378] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide. CCP keeps calling what they are providing 'support'. CCP gave hundreds of billions of unique (and spawned out of thin air) ships to Somer Blink in support of what? It was in support of online gambling in eve. So why does Guard avoid answering my question. Q: Why does CCP want to support online gambling in eve with free assets and extensive vouching? To be honest I have thought about this quite a bit and have come to only one conclusion that doesn't involve outright misconduct by CCP employees. Despite my stance on this issue, I generally do not subscribe to the "cheating dev" theory. I have met Guard, for instance and think he's a great guy. I don't believe he is guilty of misconduct. I just think, and I am sorry for this Guard, that he's a little too emotionally attached to SOMERblink, either because of a love for SOMER or because of an attachment to their decision and an inability to admit they made a mistake. So that all being said, there is one answer that doesn't involve misconduct and makes sense: SOMERblink, either knowlingly, or more than likely unknowingly (because he hires CCP dev alts without knowing it) is literally removing isk from the game. They are taking it, and destroying it. This would actually be supportive of the economy believe it or not. So yeah, CCP supports the removal of isk from the game because it prevents inflation in the economy, and that's good for the game. The problem is, if that isk isn't being destroyed, but instead is being hoarded somewhere, if it is released in a large amount into circulation, it could have terrible consequences in terms of inflation. CCP has basically chosen to support SOMER as a sort of Federal Reserve, which is only safe and reasonable if CCP knows that they are permanently removing isk from circulation.
Or if CCP have some sort of agreement with SOMER on what will happen to the isk. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:18:00 -
[379] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: I can draw your line for you.
CCP on one side. SOMER on the other. Don't cross it.
It isn't that hard, businesses have to draw these kind of lines all the time to avoid conflicts of interest, why are you having such a hard time?
And how do you plan on addressing this concern in time for EVE Vegas to make sure everyone has a fair opportunity to enter, because otherwise such arbitrary banning of participation might not only create discontent among the player base, but it may not even be legal given the Vegas 'lotteries' are for prizes with real cash value? The fact is SOMER is not necessarily equipped to do this fairly.
Once again, I have your answer, since CCP seems to struggling with it.
CCP | SOMER
Don't cross the line.
I couldnt agree more. Put bluntly, Somer must be laughing all the way to the bank thanks to CCPs promotion of his service.
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:
SOMER - not a fansite, not a community site, do nothing for the community other than as advertising to bring in more revenue to SOMER, already unbelievably isk-rich - why, why, why would you ever think they deserved anything from CCP to help them?
This stinks of favouritism and your responses stink of covering up as you (CCP as a whole) continually imply they do good for the community without any evidence whatsoever other than the obvious point that you think they're great.
you are 100% right Rus, Guard is doing what I call the dance. He is overtly avoiding all the hard, honest talk and discussion points and totally skirting the topic. Somer blink simply doesn't contribute anything. It is an online gambling service HELLO. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:18:00 -
[380] - Quote
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:
SOMER - not a fansite, not a community site, do nothing for the community other than as advertising to bring in more revenue to SOMER, already unbelievably isk-rich - why, why, why would you ever think they deserved anything from CCP to help them?
This stinks of favouritism and your responses stink of covering up as you (CCP as a whole) continually imply they do good for the community without any evidence whatsoever other than the obvious point that you think they're great.
Let's put an end to this nonsense because I am frankly, sick of it.
http://cogdev.net/blink/
Guard, please tell me what makes that a great fansite? Explain to me how that site makes people play eve or enhances their experience in EVE. |
|

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1938
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:21:00 -
[381] - Quote
Is it too hard for people to believe that the train of thought at CCP was:
Our players are meeting up in Vegas. Lets do something cool for them. What's cool? Prizes are cool. We don't have an infrastructure in place to give out prizes. Who gives stuff out regularly? SomerBlink gives out a lot of stuff. Lots of people use them. Lets use Somer to raffle the prizes off. People like prizes, it'll be fine. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:26:00 -
[382] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Is it too hard for people to believe that the train of thought at CCP was:
Our players are meeting up in Vegas. Lets do something cool for them. What's cool? Prizes are cool. We don't have an infrastructure in place to give out prizes. Who gives stuff out regularly? SomerBlink gives out a lot of stuff. Lots of people use them. Lets use Somer to raffle the prizes off. People like prizes, it'll be fine.
totally invalid contribution to the debate.
ITS JUST A RAFFLE!
Literally, anyone with even the most basic and rudimentary resemblance of intelligence can do a raffle. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2215
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:28:00 -
[383] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide. CCP Guard, you need to set the bar higher, far far higher. It should be a big red flag if the event is inaccessible to even one member of the player base. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:28:00 -
[384] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Ruskarn Andedare wrote:
SOMER - not a fansite, not a community site, do nothing for the community other than as advertising to bring in more revenue to SOMER, already unbelievably isk-rich - why, why, why would you ever think they deserved anything from CCP to help them?
This stinks of favouritism and your responses stink of covering up as you (CCP as a whole) continually imply they do good for the community without any evidence whatsoever other than the obvious point that you think they're great.
Let's put an end to this nonsense because I am frankly, sick of it. http://cogdev.net/blink/Guard, please tell me what makes that a great fansite? Explain to me how that site makes people play eve or enhances their experience in EVE.
Its got nothing to do with being a fan site. It is just a way for the owner to make isk hand over fist. Who'd have guessed this gambling site could also be passed off as a 'community centre' and thus qualify for hundreds of billions in isk gifts (spawned from thin air by CCP) and persistant, and determined, CCP promotion? |

Sturmwolke
459
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:36:00 -
[385] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: [good post]
Does this really need to be made any clearer? A goddamn monkey could understand the conflict of interest here and yet we have thus seen three CCP devs come to us who have shown an inability to "get it".
So yes - stop insulting our intelligence.
Well, if one was to analyze CCP's Guard OP, assuming he wrote all of that ... it's really nothing more that a fluffy damage control post which sidesteps most of the angst against it.
First few paragraphs is a subtle attempt to devalue the gifts given, lessening the impact ... whilst at the same time avoiding critical questions. The middle attempts to provide justification through weak blanket comparisons, instead of on a case-by-case basis and the rest deflects the arrow aimed at it through a "let's all move forward" routine.
I think they missed explaining on WHY those ISW weren't pulled, with all the pertaining juicy details. 
The fact that they allowed a third-party to sponsor an EVE related event puts CCP at a disadvantage when it comes to negotiation. Think of it as a goodwill debt towards the third-party .... i.e. CCP owes them something. Those blind to this fact will say .. no no, it's of mutual benefit - a win-win situation. Well my dear fellow, read up on the controversies surrounding TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Agreement and tell me, can you smell a rat? These agreements were supposedly of mutual benefits to its signatories ... supposedly. There's plenty of other cases of insidious and subtle maneuvering towards an end goal(s) that masks itself as beneficial/mutually beneficial - prev example was just from top of my head.
Hammer down policies for 3rd party sponsorship so that you'll never be put at a ransom. Evaluate each offer on a case-by-case basis. Integrity should never, ever be compromised. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:36:00 -
[386] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame.
It does not matter if it's a Video, a blogpost or a whole Tournament. Some people put so many hours into fan projects and they deserved at least something. It does not matter if it's ISK or just a thank you.
Bloggers already get their media account, how about something for those awesome video makers from /my eve/? The video makers from My EVE are awesome contributors and it would be cool to find a way to encourage and reward them more. We have done things like just send someone a T-shirt or a ship model for catching our attention in a big way but we should look at what we can do more when we design our framework for this.
Like, invite them to a dev roam to film a video? Create a test account to use in the holy dev space maybe?
As someone who used to film (other games) the opportunity to film something, anything!, with game devs and/or staff is off the charts awesome.
This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:43:00 -
[387] - Quote
Sturmwolke wrote:Argus Sorn wrote: [good post]
Does this really need to be made any clearer? A goddamn monkey could understand the conflict of interest here and yet we have thus seen three CCP devs come to us who have shown an inability to "get it".
So yes - stop insulting our intelligence.
Well, if one was to analyze CCP's Guard OP, assuming he wrote all of that ... it's really nothing more that a fluffy damage control post which sidesteps most of the angst against it. First few paragraphs is a subtle attempt to devalue the gifts given, lessening the impact ... whilst at the same time avoiding critical questions. The middle attempts to provide justification through weak blanket comparisons, instead of on a case-by-case basis and the rest deflects the arrow aimed at it through a "let's all move forward" routine. I think they missed explaining on WHY those ISW weren't pulled, with all the pertaining juicy details.  The fact that they allowed a third-party to sponsor an EVE related event puts CCP at a disadvantage when it comes to negotiation. Think of it as a goodwill debt towards the third-party .... i.e. CCP owes them something. Those blind to this fact will say .. no no, it's of mutual benefit - a win-win situation. Well my dear fellow, read up on the controversies surrounding TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Agreement and tell me, can you smell a rat? These agreements were supposedly of mutual benefits to its signatories ... supposedly. There's plenty of other cases of insidious and subtle maneuvering towards an end goal(s) that masks itself as beneficial/mutually beneficial - prev example was just from top of my head. Hammer down policies for 3rd party sponsorship so that you'll never be put at a ransom. Evaluate each offer on a case-by-case basis. Integrity should never, ever be compromised.
You are being far to reserved for my tastes.
The OP could be summarised as saying:
"Somer does a lot of good for the community, so to support them we gave them 30 trits worth of ships. This has upset a few people so we will be responsible and introduce new rules to give prizes by"
Somer doesnt do any good for the community. Somer is just good at raking in isk from its eve punters hand over fist, and strategically sponsoring events to get even more punters on its website losing isk.
CCP saw fit to reward said behaviour with hundreds of billions in unique rare ships and constant promotion and vouches.
Question to CCP: Are you trying to promote more of us to start up online gambling ventures in eve?
Again I dont expect an answer as CCP purely made this thread to do their 'avoid the issue' dance. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:52:00 -
[388] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:A Research Alt wrote:This does not address at all the criteria CCP uses to determine "services rendered" and why Somer Blink got so much in the way of rewards while there are far more deserving entities for any particular criteria it would be reasonable for CCP to have used. The precise criteria isn't that scientific at the moment which is why we're planning to design a more transparent criteria for contributors and others as well. We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. Same story with the SCL which was having an active period and doing really exciting things.
I'm posting this as I'm reading them, so forgive me if it's been addressed (20 pages already!!!) but when you reward the entity that sponsors an event... isn't that disingenuous?
You would think the Event Coordinators (say, for the SCL) would reward their benefactors, not the game creators.
Like... why are you giving the impression Somer Blink was behind the SCL when they only assisted in making sure it went through?
The coordinators are the heroes in that story.
Just seems odd that if I were to create a huge event, say, sacrifice a titan, or a highsec capital which would be a huuuge impact since I would be giving up any sort of grandfather mechanic, that you would reward the person who bought a bunch of battleships to kill it as opposed to "me" who organized, supplied the target, and sacrificed a game changing mechanic that would never be done again (well, rare if existent at all).
I think that's where "transparency" gets muddied. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4322

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:57:00 -
[389] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first. 1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit. 2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled? When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire. Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis.
I'm sorry if this offended you, was certainly not my intention. But it may be that we have slightly differing philosophies on what constitutes sponsoring an event and I was mostly just trying to highlight that difference. Note that I'm not talking about any specific entity here or any specific case but rather the overall point of whether a profit making enterprise can actually be seen as sponsoring something with a portion of the money they get from their profit making enterprise since they get the money from others. I think it can since it obtains the right to decide where that money goes once it's legally acquired it. Of course, everyone is always free to have their reservations about individual cases based on whatever factors matter to them. Just to add an example CCP has supported charities time and again and we are a company that has a board and investors and is expected to do well financially. Of course that support would never be possible without you, the players, so maybe we both have a point :). Anyway...philosophy aside, I'll address your questions.
1. We didn't because we were, at the time, treating this as business as usual. We don't generally bring individual reward or prize ideas up with the CSM. But looking back, if we had...maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation so there's that... We
2. No special reason we didn't have one this time. We'll definitely have one for the winter summit. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 15:58:00 -
[390] - Quote
If you run the SCL, you didn't build that! SOMERBlink did.
lol |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:01:00 -
[391] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: I'm sorry if this offended you, was certainly not my intention. But it may be that we have slightly differing philosophies on what constitutes sponsoring an event and I was mostly just trying to highlight that difference. Note that I'm not talking about any specific entity here or any specific case but rather the overall point of whether a profit making enterprise can actually be seen as sponsoring something with a portion of the money they get from their profit making enterprise since they get the money from others. I think it can since it obtains the right to decide where that money goes once it's legally acquired it. Of course, everyone is always free to have their reservations about individual cases based on whatever factors matter to them. Just to add an example CCP has supported charities time and again and we are a company that has a board and investors and is expected to do well financially. Of course that support would never be possible without you, the players, so maybe we both have a point :). Anyway...philosophy aside, I'll address your questions.
LOL.
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:04:00 -
[392] - Quote
CCP shouldn't be parachuting in any 300b isk support packages for a start. It is simply meddling in the game too much.
And any praise given to in game entities needs to be well screened. Praise encourages further actions, and indicates support. Why does CCP want to show such strong support for an online gambling service in eve? Do they want to see more of this? Do they think Somer Blink desperately needs the isk?
The only reasonable argument CCP can counter with is that they did not intend to endorse Somerblink as the 300b was a secret backhand.
The tragic thing about this is most EVE players don't even play Blink. Most players hate it. It is simply the oldest scam in the book: "organised gambling games".
Most players dont want to waste all their isk on SomerBlinks website so CCP shouldn't be surprised that there is such outrage over this outrageous use of spawned assets and CCP endorsement. |

Kate stark
589
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:04:00 -
[393] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:We don't have an infrastructure in place to give out prizes.
except that's not true at all. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:06:00 -
[394] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS?
If it was a mini iws for the captain's quarter then nothing. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
417
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:10:00 -
[395] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP shouldn't be parachuting in any 300b isk support packages for a start. It is simply meddling in the game too much.
And any praise given to in game entities needs to be well screened. Praise encourages further actions, and indicates support. Why does CCP want to show such strong support for an online gambling service in eve? Do they want to see more of this? Do they think Somer Blink desperately needs the isk?
The only reasonable argument CCP can counter with is that they did not intend to endorse Somerblink as the 300b was a secret backhand.
The tragic thing about this is most EVE players don't even play Blink. Most players hate it. It is simply the oldest scam in the book: "organised gambling games".
Most players dont want to waste all their isk on SomerBlinks website so CCP shouldn't be surprised that there is such outrage over this outrageous use of spawned assets and CCP endorsement.
Agreed on all points.
The fact of the matter is SOMER moves plexes. All this banter back and forth with Guard is simply trying to dance around the edges of this debacle and sooth the minds of angry players with attention via blue posts.
No offense Guard, you're just the messenger. Not today spaghetti. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:13:00 -
[396] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote: You are being far to reserved for my tastes.
The OP could be summarised as saying:
"Somer does a lot of good for the community, so to support them we gave them 30 trits worth of ships. This has upset a few people so we will be responsible and introduce new rules to give prizes by"
Somer doesnt do any good for the community. Somer is just good at raking in isk from its eve punters hand over fist, and strategically sponsoring events to get even more punters on its website losing isk.
CCP saw fit to reward said behaviour with hundreds of billions in unique rare ships and constant promotion and vouches.
Question to CCP: Are you trying to promote more of us to start up online gambling ventures in eve?
Again I dont expect an answer as CCP purely made this thread to do their 'avoid the issue' dance.
SOMER sponsors teams in alliance tournaments. SOMER sponsors prizes in other competitions and raffles. Isn't it a bit convenient to ignore these things and only portray them as evil profiteers?
Oh, and don't forget the line that these things don't count as giving back to the community - it counts as advertising, and thus all part of a grand money-grubbing evil plot.
If what SOMER provides wasn't fun for the community, would they be making isk at it?
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4322

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:14:00 -
[397] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:As a fan site owner I got goodies worth of about ~1B and felt honored. I sold the items and gave my corp mates some free ships, which leads to more PvP ingame.
It does not matter if it's a Video, a blogpost or a whole Tournament. Some people put so many hours into fan projects and they deserved at least something. It does not matter if it's ISK or just a thank you.
Bloggers already get their media account, how about something for those awesome video makers from /my eve/? The video makers from My EVE are awesome contributors and it would be cool to find a way to encourage and reward them more. We have done things like just send someone a T-shirt or a ship model for catching our attention in a big way but we should look at what we can do more when we design our framework for this. Like, invite them to a dev roam to film a video? Create a test account to use in the holy dev space maybe? As someone who used to film (other games) the opportunity to film something, anything!, with game devs and/or staff is off the charts awesome.
That's a cool idea. If you guys can handle yourself in...the danger zone! CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:16:00 -
[398] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first. 1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit. 2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled? When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire. Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis. I'm sorry if this offended you, was certainly not my intention. But it may be that we have slightly differing philosophies on what constitutes sponsoring an event and I was mostly just trying to highlight that difference. Note that I'm not talking about any specific entity here or any specific case but rather the overall point of whether a profit making enterprise can actually be seen as sponsoring something with a portion of the money they get from their profit making enterprise since they get the money from others. I think it can since it obtains the right to decide where that money goes once it's legally acquired it. Of course, everyone is always free to have their reservations about individual cases based on whatever factors matter to them. Just to add an example CCP has supported charities time and again and we are a company that has a board and investors and is expected to do well financially. Of course that support would never be possible without you, the players, so maybe we both have a point :). Anyway...philosophy aside, I'll address your questions. 1. We didn't because we were, at the time, treating this as business as usual. We don't generally bring individual reward or prize ideas up with the CSM. But looking back, if we had...maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation so there's that... We 2. No special reason we didn't have one this time. We'll definitely have one for the winter summit.
While I am sure the summits, council for stella management feedback forums and this thread are insanely powerful to keep CCP reasonable... Id rather CCP just announced the ships were being confiscated back from Somerblink.
|

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:17:00 -
[399] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. This pretty much exactly, the reward of being recognized and in a way immortalized with the items you have, or monuments, or even names of planets etc is one of the best ways to show appreciation. Things like that would be worth so much more in terms of memories and feeling accomplishment than a regular item you sell for some ISK. I've been joking since years that my personal ultimate goal would be to have a planet named after me, and I'm sure that alot of people who dedicate themselves making things to try and improve and build the community (not for profit only) would feel very rewarded by things like that. /c
Like a burned out planet that cannot be used for material gain. They are indeed rare and would love to be associated with one.
Or for you, a GIANT I mean huge, asteroid of veldspar that could not be mined. Like those big "S-Shaped Asteroid" you see in missions. But have it near your home system.
That kind of stuff is awesome as hell and could never equate any amount of money.
Ever.
This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:17:00 -
[400] - Quote
Murk Paradox wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Livonia Velorea wrote:Out of game only or vanity trash like:
- A piece of Steve - Band of Brothers Director Access Key - Lost reminder to pay sov bill
What is the differents between those items and a IWS? If it was a mini iws for the captain's quarter then nothing.
It is simple, so simple:
1) CCP should not endorse an in game corp by giving them responsibility of thousands of dollars in prizes, they should run their own raffles. They should have no close dealings with in game corporations at all that could be seen as supporting one corporation over another. Especially not if those corporations deal in isk to the extent that SOMER does. Not when isk has such real world value and a huge impact on a player driven economy.
2) If CCP wants to reward anyone directly for contributions, they should be with token, out of game prizes such as ship models, usb hubs, signed art, etc.. Honestly those prizes, to worthy recipients, would be cherished far more than a ship.
But instead of it being addressed fundamentally, (which has nothing directly to do with Somer, other than the fact they are clearly an IN GAME entity) we get continued defense of Somer by CCP Guard. Guard, it's making you look bad. Very bad.
You are a community developer and you are dismissing the concerns of members of that community to defend one in game corporation that happens to make and then throw around a lot of in game currency. You are constantly taking the side of SOMERblink in your posts, and defending them. But you state, even yourself, that you are defending them because they've handed out a lot of isk. Listen to yourself! You have been, albeit indirectly, bought.
SOMER gives a lot of isk out and they get the attention and approval of CCP Guard and others. If SOMER gains the approval of devs because they tossed isk around in the game that is wrong. It is influence peddling. It is bribery. It is conflict of interest. You do not need to take the isk directly into your pocket for it to be so.
Sorry CCP Guard, but you've failed us. SOMERblink clearly has you in their pocket - even if indirectly because they toss isk around in the game. You've been bought, and nothing you say regarding them hold any weight anymore. Sad. |
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4485
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:20:00 -
[401] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP shouldn't be parachuting in any 300b isk support packages for a start. It is simply meddling in the game too much.
And any praise given to in game entities needs to be well screened. Praise encourages further actions, and indicates support. Why does CCP want to show such strong support for an online gambling service in eve? Do they want to see more of this? Do they think Somer Blink desperately needs the isk?
The only reasonable argument CCP can counter with is that they did not intend to endorse Somerblink as the 300b was a secret backhand.
The tragic thing about this is most EVE players don't even play Blink. Most players hate it. It is simply the oldest scam in the book: "organised gambling games".
Most players dont want to waste all their isk on SomerBlinks website so CCP shouldn't be surprised that there is such outrage over this outrageous use of spawned assets and CCP endorsement.
Which is it?
SOMER is rolling in isk because so many people love to play it, or do most people hate it?
You can't have your opinionated baseless "facts" swinging around so freely and then argue with them.
Also, please show me where you think 30 of these ships is worth 300b isk, and don't just show me where one yahoo paid 10b for one of them, or I'll show you where one fool paid millions of isk for 1 tritanium.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:21:00 -
[402] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote: You are being far to reserved for my tastes.
The OP could be summarised as saying:
"Somer does a lot of good for the community, so to support them we gave them 30 trits worth of ships. This has upset a few people so we will be responsible and introduce new rules to give prizes by"
Somer doesnt do any good for the community. Somer is just good at raking in isk from its eve punters hand over fist, and strategically sponsoring events to get even more punters on its website losing isk.
CCP saw fit to reward said behaviour with hundreds of billions in unique rare ships and constant promotion and vouches.
Question to CCP: Are you trying to promote more of us to start up online gambling ventures in eve?
Again I dont expect an answer as CCP purely made this thread to do their 'avoid the issue' dance.
SOMER sponsors teams in alliance tournaments. SOMER sponsors prizes in other competitions and raffles. Isn't it a bit convenient to ignore these things and only portray them as evil profiteers? Oh, and don't forget the line that these things don't count as giving back to the community - it counts as advertising, and thus all part of a grand money-grubbing evil plot. If what SOMER provides wasn't fun for the community, would they be making isk at it?
Well yes that is exactly what I am saying. Somer sponsors to make more isk for somer and somer's 'employees', and further its ingame business.
You are literally trying to label an online gambling service a charity, are you mad? All Gambling organisations extensively use sponsorships as part of their business model.
Somtimes I wonder If what I am reading is real with online forums.
|
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4323

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:30:00 -
[403] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:There is so much sense being spoken in this thread, and I just cant stop thinking about the audacity of CCPs '30 trit' gambit.
I agree with Argus Sorn and Josef Djugashvilis 100%, and many others that have posted I have not named.
Another Question for CCP (bet they dont answer): Why are you pushing online eve gambling so hard?
Can we actually get one thing out of the way for good?
The announcement didn't say that the IWS was "just" a cheap thing that refines to 1 trit and is worth nothing. In the announcement we made a clear distinction between what it technically is (a pretty thing with no base mineral value) and what it actually is once it reaches player's hands on TQ, a thing of value due to scarcity.
Keep in mind that there are many people likely to read an announcement like this and not all of them know the back story,what the IWS is, or why it obtains value so it's important to make it clear. We may make mistakes here an there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :) CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
213
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:30:00 -
[404] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:CCP Guard wrote:In the same sense you could say that CCP didn't support SOMER, the players did :). Not trying to be a smartass, I promise, ...just a little late night philosophy Well as a customer who enjoys you as a human being and a developer. I will not read into this anymore then it is. but fing with smart ass responses when you know what I mean is not helping. So lets start over here is your chance. Answer these question first. 1. Why wasn't the CSM told about this at the Summer Summit. 2. Why was the community team session not even on the agenda or was it on the agenda and canceled? When you can give a good answer to these question I will return fire. Guard here is a tip: When some one says they are not trying to be something. That is exactly what they are trying to be. I think they call that passive aggressive. As a community rep you need to avoid that during a crisis. I'm sorry if this offended you, was certainly not my intention. But it may be that we have slightly differing philosophies on what constitutes sponsoring an event and I was mostly just trying to highlight that difference. Note that I'm not talking about any specific entity here or any specific case but rather the overall point of whether a profit making enterprise can actually be seen as sponsoring something with a portion of the money they get from their profit making enterprise since they get the money from others. I think it can since it obtains the right to decide where that money goes once it's legally acquired it. Of course, everyone is always free to have their reservations about individual cases based on whatever factors matter to them. Just to add an example CCP has supported charities time and again and we are a company that has a board and investors and is expected to do well financially. Of course that support would never be possible without you, the players, so maybe we both have a point :). Anyway...philosophy aside, I'll address your questions. 1. We didn't because we were, at the time, treating this as business as usual. We don't generally bring individual reward or prize ideas up with the CSM. But looking back, if we had...maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation so there's that... We 2. No special reason we didn't have one this time. We'll definitely have one for the winter summit.
http://community.eveonline.com/community/csm/
The Council of Stellar Management What is the CSM? The Council of Stellar Management (CSM) is a player-elected council who represent the views of the members of the EVE Online community to CCP. To quote part of the CSM white paper summary:
The purpose of the CSM is to represent society interests to CCP. This requires active engagement with the player community to master EVE issue awareness, understanding, and evaluation in the context of the greatest good for the greater player base.
CSM and CCP Communication Upon being elected, the members of the CSM are able to communicate closely with CCP through two primary avenues:
GÇóThere are at least two summits held each term, in which the members of the council are flown to Reykjavik to spend three days in meetings with CCP staff. The staff who the CSM meet are from almost all departments, and the meetings are regarding whichever issues the CSM choose to raise. GÇóAccess to an internal forum which only the CSM and CCP staff have access to, where discussions regarding various topics can be brought up by either group in a less formal manner than the summits. If you would like to read more about the CSM, please refer to the CSM white paper.
This is business as usual for us. Please read it again the company you work for took the time and money to develope this website and process and you completly ignored it cause you you are classifing this "We don't generally bring individual reward or prize ideas up with the CSM." WOW that is all i have to say individual rewards is that how you are viewing this really tell me this is not true or you ment something else.
" But looking back, if we had...maybe we wouldn't be having this conversation so there's that... This is about the only thing I can agree with in this discussion.
So in essence CCP has wasted money on developing the CSM, the CSM website, hiring community people like peter and john to over see it. Not only did the community team knock down the fourth wall of the sandbox, they also ignored a department in CCP that was created to breach the gap between is players and developers. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:34:00 -
[405] - Quote
Kuda Timberline wrote:Well, for all those jumping up and down screaming like a 2yr old "IT ISN'T FAIR" ...seems you got what you wanted. Quote:For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. ...and this is why "we" can't have nice things. "We" being folks who spend extra time to create content for this community. I don't see this game going far if people stop engaging and just start sitting in station ship spinning.
Excellent point.
Now, if you could show me what content SB created, we will have a basis for a discussion. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Shai 'Hulud
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:36:00 -
[406] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:There is so much sense being spoken in this thread, and I just cant stop thinking about the audacity of CCPs '30 trit' gambit.
I agree with Argus Sorn and Josef Djugashvilis 100%, and many others that have posted I have not named.
Another Question for CCP (bet they dont answer): Why are you pushing online eve gambling so hard? Can we actually get one thing out of the way for good? The announcement didn't say that the IWS was "just" a cheap thing that refines to 1 trit and is worth nothing. In the announcement we made a clear distinction between what it technically is (a pretty thing with no base mineral value) and what it actually is once it reaches player's hands on TQ, a thing of value due to scarcity. Keep in mind that there are many people likely to read an announcement like this and not all of them know the back story,what the IWS is, or why it obtains value so it's important to make it clear. We may make mistakes here an there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :) You guys have brought up the "it's just 1 trit" approach over and over again. Don't try to hide from it now.
That's like saying the T20 giveaway was only worth what the t2 bpo's would refine into (idk if they even do refine into something, but you get my point). All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Shai 'Hulud
60
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:38:00 -
[407] - Quote
... continued ...
You are intentionally trying to downplay what happened when every time you talk about it you spend half your time talking about how "usless these 20b isk value ships are." All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
254
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:46:00 -
[408] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:... continued ...
You are intentionally trying to downplay what happened when every time you talk about it you spend half your time talking about how "usless these 20b isk value ships are."
Agreed.
The 'charity' argument, the 'ship not very good' argument, the '1 trit' argument, and even the 'it's popular because you guys bet there' argument... they all hold no water.
They are an in game entity. CCP should not endorse them.
The very fact that their sponsorships have gained them special dev attention, gifts, and the ability to raffle off prizes on behalf of ccm... prove that those sponsorships WORKED. They bought their influence.
The fact you confirm this very thing in your mails as if it means nothing is laughable.
An in game corp has gained the approval, endorsement, and special attention of devs by making insane amounts of isk and tossing some of it around in the game.
How does that not sink in as wrong to you? I am just dumbfounded at the ignorance.
Yeah - one thing is right, you definitely are no Jedi. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:46:00 -
[409] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:... Its got nothing to do with being a fan site. It is just a way for the owner to make isk hand over fist... If that was all it was, I wouldn't feel nearly as strongly as I do about the gifts. Somer Blink is not only in the business of making ISK, but also of converting it into real money.
I'll borrow the tactic CCP Guard used when he said he wasn't trying to be a smartass and say, "I'm not trying to accuse Somer Blink of RMT, but they do convert ISK into real money." I'm not saying what they do is wrong, since it's CCP's role to enforce the EULA and CCP is apparently very happy with Somer's business model. And I'm not saying making a profit from EVE players is bad, especially when, by and large, most of their customers seem happy with the deal. But if their motive was to accumulate ISK rather than real money, why would they pay you ISK credit to go to another site and purchase GTCs?
I have no inside knowledge of how much ISK or dollars pass through Somer's hands. For all I know he could be rich or he could be on the verge of bankruptcy. Between Blink prizes, employee compensation, and event sponsorship, he may redistribute all the ISK he takes in. It's a lovely business model, in which much of the payroll and advertising expenses can be paid with ISK rather than real money. Obviously there are other expenses, including web servers and development, but I can only assume these are covered by the commissions on GTC sales.
The point is that Somer Blink is not just an in-game company in pursuit of ISK. They operate both in game and in the real world. I guess that's what makes them special to CCP. The GTC's they make their money selling represent income to CCP, and from the sound of it, not an insignificant amount of it.
Those of us who find fault with CCP's decision to provide in-game enrichment to Somer Blink and its employees have been called everything from idiots to jealous crybabies. We've been told to HTFU, and that we should not expect fairness. Life is not fair, so get over it. Yes, the unfairness of life is one of the things that make online virtual worlds popular. We pay real money for the chance to escape into these worlds. When our crybaby sensibilities begin to see EVE as inherently unfair (and by unfair I do not mean cruel or hard - there is a difference), we aren't likely to continue our support of it. It is up to CCP to determine how important our money is to their bottom line. Maybe they don't need us. Maybe Somer Blink will keep them afloat.
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
254
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:49:00 -
[410] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:
An in game corp has gained the approval, endorsement, and special attention of devs by making insane amounts of isk and tossing some of it around in the game.
Yes I am quoting myself, but I want ot make clear that this is the fundamental problem here. Address it, or move it up the chain of command to someone who can please.
Thank you. |
|

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
560
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 16:49:00 -
[411] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Chris Winter wrote: Except that the podcast is presumably written for entertainment purposes, to the benefit of everyone who wants to read it. Anybody, even those who don't play EVE, can go listen to the podcast for free. In that way, they're providing a community service for free.
If they had received ISK and ships for just doing PVP without the podcast...that's more like what's happening there. SB is being rewarded for running a business in game.
How long until CCP rewards the ISK doublers? Because that's basically the same thing.
Gambling is also for entertainment :D If not that then for what? The podcast had advertisment (for SOMER Blink, hehe), that means the listeners were the product. If you want to take part in a Tournament you also need to have an active account. Do ISK doublers (the scammers) give out billions of ISK for ingame events?
When I buy a scratcher from a store, it isn't the fun of rubbing a coin across the grey material.
It's to win money.
This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
256
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:02:00 -
[412] - Quote
Careby wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:... Its got nothing to do with being a fan site. It is just a way for the owner to make isk hand over fist... If that was all it was, I wouldn't feel nearly as strongly as I do about the gifts. Somer Blink is not only in the business of making ISK, but also of converting it into real money. I'll borrow the tactic CCP Guard used when he said he wasn't trying to be a smartass and say, "I'm not trying to accuse Somer Blink of RMT, but they do convert ISK into real money." I'm not saying what they do is wrong, since it's CCP's role to enforce the EULA and CCP is apparently very happy with Somer's business model. And I'm not saying making a profit from EVE players is bad, especially when, by and large, most of their customers seem happy with the deal. But if their motive was to accumulate ISK rather than real money, why would they pay you ISK credit to go to another site and purchase GTCs? I have no inside knowledge of how much ISK or dollars pass through Somer's hands. For all I know he could be rich or he could be on the verge of bankruptcy. Between Blink prizes, employee compensation, and event sponsorship, he may redistribute all the ISK he takes in. It's a lovely business model, in which much of the payroll and advertising expenses can be paid with ISK rather than real money. Obviously there are other expenses, including web servers and development, but I can only assume these are covered by the commissions on GTC sales. The point is that Somer Blink is not just an in-game company in pursuit of ISK. They operate both in game and in the real world. I guess that's what makes them special to CCP. The GTC's they make their money selling represent income to CCP, and from the sound of it, not an insignificant amount of it. Those of us who find fault with CCP's decision to provide in-game enrichment to Somer Blink and its employees have been called everything from idiots to jealous crybabies. We've been told to HTFU, and that we should not expect fairness. Life is not fair, so get over it. Yes, the unfairness of life is one of the things that make online virtual worlds popular. We pay real money for the chance to escape into these worlds. When our crybaby sensibilities begin to see EVE as inherently unfair (and by unfair I do not mean cruel or hard - there is a difference), we aren't likely to continue our support of it. It is up to CCP to determine how important our money is to their bottom line. Maybe they don't need us. Maybe Somer Blink will keep them afloat.
Keep in mind they RMT by the way.
You buy a GTC from them, they give you isk.
Let's review that: you give SOMER cash, they give you isk. Isk for cash. Cash for isk. That's RMT. Plain and simple.
And it is ISK that devs applaud them for making and throwing around.
SOMERblink is allowed to RMT because they toss isk around in the community and this makes devs like them.
LOL.
It's awesome, isn't it? |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
562
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:02:00 -
[413] - Quote
Gogela wrote:A Research Alt wrote:Quote:Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? You shouldn't be giving out cash rewards in the first place. The Devs get a cash reward for building the game. The web designer got a cash reward for building this forum. WTF is the difference if they want to pay people cash for building a community site? Putting up something ridiculous like this robs any of your other arguments of credibility. If your objective is to sway your audience, you should focus on the points most important to you. /my2isk
Somer Blink is not a community site. It's a business. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3826
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:05:00 -
[414] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time.
This is what you said in that post:
CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few.
That reply lacks specific details some of us keep asking you for. For whatever reason you continue to evade answering those questions directly.
Please clarify your post quoted above:
SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly?
SB's "capability" of doing what exactly?
What "niche" exactly are you referring to?
Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"?
Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed?
if there are other considerations as you stated, could you please disclose any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
562
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:12:00 -
[415] - Quote
Pharill wrote:K0ttDiledundee wrote:What about those of us who have played for many many years without breaks in our subscription.........where's our special rare items? We've spent years generating real content in the form of battles and participation in your game and we dont even get a thanjs. All sb does is rake in isk through controling a lottery with stacked odds in favor of fake/alt characters. And now they've been given even more isk. Sad ccp just sad. *ahem* cry, cry, whine, moan, etc etc. This it what it boils down to. "ME ME ME, I I I" Anyone who feels like this .. Stick your rails up your rear and hit F1. CCP is a company and as such can do pretty much anything they damn well please with their product. I have zero, zilch, nada issues with them giving away these ships. They are worthless in game and only worth isk because in game fools are willing to throw away billions on them. Here's a thought take the 15bill you're going to spend on that IWS and throw it into BLINK. Even if you hate to gamble I bet you can turn a profit. Oh and the complaint "They're for profit. You're making them richer" That's like giving Scrooge McDuck a million bucks and letting people say you made them rich. He's already rich! 300-600bill is a effing drop in Somers wallet. So CCP you want people to shut up about the IWS give one to everyone, tha'll shut em' up. I fully support what you are doing, I personally don't really care who or how many of the IWS' you give away. And do you have to tell me about it? Heck no. Why? Because honestly it doesn't affect a single individual player in the entire cluster.
While CCP can and will do whatever they want, they also want feedback from us. Keep in mind who the OP is and that should help clear up any need to post here if you really do not care.
Some of us do care, and CCP is asking for our input.
We are giving it. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
562
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:17:00 -
[416] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Kate stark wrote:Gogela wrote:PLEX, even in bulk, seems perfectly fine to me. no, he's right with respect to handing out plex as rewards. whether scorpions, or a stack of plex; ccp are still giving players a fist full of isk and that fucks with the sandbox. on the other hand, people buying and selling plex isn't an issue. here's why; plex spawned by CCP and given out is a resource that has no limit and provides wealth in conjunction with the pilots day to day activities. plex purchased by your average joe eve player is limited to the cash in their bank account; and you can either earn money at work to turn plex in to isk, or play eve (don't argue that you can do both, because you're either going to get fired or make **** isk/hour to the point of irrelevance) and hence in some capacity plex via that method is limited. however this really isn't about how plex works and lets shut up now please? I explained how it works. Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference?
That developer is not representing the community site.
Just like you don't reward the construction crews who built John Hopkins for the awesome research done there by the doctors. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4323

|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:21:00 -
[417] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time. This is what you said in that post: CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. That reply lacks specific details some of us keep asking you for. For whatever reason you continue to evade answering those questions directly. Please clarify your post quoted above: SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? SB's "capability" of doing what exactly? What "niche" exactly are you referring to? Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed? if there are other considerations as you stated, could you please disclose any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety?
You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Cierra Royce
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
78
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:34:00 -
[418] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
It's probably not a good idea to start joint ventures with in game corporations, individuals or groups that will result in them getting exclusive and hidden access to extremely valuable trinkets and other items that can be spawned on their behalf, nobody will see it as fair, fairly earned or justified in any way. Stick to monuments, memorial tokens, renaming planets/stars/moons.
Just saying.
ed: Guard want to love you guys really do, make it easy for me, keep the sandbox harsh unforgiving and as free as possible of the hands of eager Gods bearing gifts |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3827
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:36:00 -
[419] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
Well, answering my direct questions instead of glossing over them with generalizations would satisfy me. Otherwise your responses thus far seem intentionally vague.
Also, I'm just asking some very specific questions here so I and others can make informed decisions, I have not stated any position, but your assumptions aside, if you provide specific answers to my very simple questions you may assist me in forming an opinion one way or another.
CCP Guard wrote: To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
Except you did not answer what is a simple yes/no question, and answered a question I did not ask. Regardless of whether they registered as one, does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite". Yes, or No?
And one you have yet to address:
Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:37:00 -
[420] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:CCP Guard, since you're clearly still actively reading and replying to this thread, what are your thoughts on somers - or indeed any third party CCP may deal with in the future - banning and excluding paying subscribers at their own discretion?
It's no secret that people who share an IP address for example - like family, house mates, internet cafes - are banned from somer and not allowed to fairly take part in this recent give away. Are CCP willing to allow third parties to arbitrarily dictate rules and regulations that EVE players must abide to in order to participate in give aways or other events CCP are helping create/sponsor/etc? We're aware of that concern and it's something we'll have a look at and draw lines around when we sit down with the CSM and map out what our guidelines should be. There are a lot of events that are inaccessible to a large portion of your playerbase for various reasons and we have to look at how all of that plays into the different levels of support we provide. The only events you speak of that could be inaccessable to a large portion are the different fanfests but this is for a supposed "fansite" (loosely used in SOMER's case). LIke I've said before you can give these "fansites" the free IWS all you want with transparency of why.
You want to run a promotion tho do it yourselves at eveonline.com with some new program that automatically puts everyone into the lottery/whatever way you come up with. Then no one can be left out and you won't have a problem with part of the playerbase being left out like tons of people were out of SOMERs due to many different reasons.. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:41:00 -
[421] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time. This is what you said in that post: CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. That reply lacks specific details some of us keep asking you for. For whatever reason you continue to evade answering those questions directly. Please clarify your post quoted above: SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? SB's "capability" of doing what exactly? What "niche" exactly are you referring to? Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed? if there are other considerations as you stated, could you please disclose any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural. To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
Um. We don't like the idea of ccp cavorting with any in game corporation, especially one that tosses isk around and engages in questionable RMT practices. This isn't a judgement call. It's a conflict of interest, done. In fact everything you post proves you are not impartial.
And it's not a lottery, it's a penny auction, something many feel is a scam of sorts.
But you love them - because they spend isk. LOL. It's almost laughable that you don't see the failure of your argument.
Will start unsubbing all but one account. Unfortunately I have a corp of people who rely on me, or i'd unsub them all. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
213
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:43:00 -
[422] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time. This is what you said in that post: CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. That reply lacks specific details some of us keep asking you for. For whatever reason you continue to evade answering those questions directly. Please clarify your post quoted above: SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? SB's "capability" of doing what exactly? What "niche" exactly are you referring to? Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed? if there are other considerations as you stated, could you please disclose any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural. To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
So I can count this as standard business practice also ???????.?. Did you discuss tournament and competitive events at the summit or in the private forums. Those are big community issues.
|

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:45:00 -
[423] - Quote
I toss isk around at players in my community, and I help new players get into incursions. Can I get my T2 BPO yet? |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1434
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:49:00 -
[424] - Quote
Why don't we all just wait and see what CCP make of it all?
I am pretty sure they are aware of the issues now.
It is also worth pointing out (the obvious) that unsubbing means you lose access to the game as well as CCP losing revenue.
Perhaps CCP Guard could give some indication of a timescale to resolve this issue. This is not a signature. |

Iosue
Black Sky Hipsters
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:50:00 -
[425] - Quote
as others have hinted at, i suspect this has more to do with the encouragement of a third-party site that brings revenue to ccp via plex sales, than anything else. if this is true, i think it should be approached in a different way. rather than calling it a reward, which implies that the recipient is receiving something for a good or noble deed, call it what it is: compensation.
there's nothing wrong with compensating those that help you improve your bottom line. but why not offer something that they really want and is more in line with compensation, like cash. this way you don't effect the game economy at all and are able to give the recipient something they really value. there's a reason bonus's work so well at encouraging certain behaviors in the real world, because people like money. |

Mordachai
Nex Exercitus Nulli Secunda
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 17:55:00 -
[426] - Quote
Just curious what is the single biggest "gift"/"reward" you have given to entity in eve since the beginning ? (value at the time ie those SIW are currently worth around 300bill at least as far as i understand)
Also why dont you have a list of rewards being given out so it would make even more people want to do good things for the community ?
Personally i think you should just create a system for i.e. lotteries/rewards/gifts/fansite capabilities into the client just like your doing with twitch... that way people might sleep better at night.
p.s. does ccp really endorse gambling where kids are allowed to play the game ? considering adults know that gambling is bad mmkay but kids like 13 years olds... have no sense of that and become like this |

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
12
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:00:00 -
[427] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
Wow. That is your response, huh? I (none of my accounts) will not be coming back. Its too bad you folks can't see the mistake you made and the urgent remedy that it required. Spinning for 20 pages was not what I was hoping for in this thread(especially after NO responses on the forums for DAYS after this fiasco). Been playing since 04 and I will absolutely never support another product with a CCP stamp on it. You broke player trust, you gave away an enormous advantage in-game and yet the best you can do is "we though it was ok because..."
Rubbish. |

Kate stark
589
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:08:00 -
[428] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Why don't we all just wait and see what CCP make of it all?
I am pretty sure they are aware of the issues now.
It is also worth pointing out (the obvious) that unsubbing means you lose access to the game as well as CCP losing revenue.
Perhaps CCP Guard could give some indication of a timescale to resolve this issue.
a timescale would be lovely, we've been waiting a full 7 days if i'm not mistaken. Wasn't the TMC article published last friday? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2676
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:09:00 -
[429] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Gogela wrote:I can almost guarantee SOMER is looking at this thread and scratching his head wondering if the player base can count. If somebody hacked his account and stole "just" 100 IWSs worth of ISK he probably wouldn't notice for a long time, if at all. That's how far outclassed our wallets are by him. It's a non-factor. He hit the ludicrous ISK mark a long time ago. If he even does it for the ISK anymore it's only to see how crazy "crazy" can get.
tl;dr; what damage? Why do you think it matters how big Somer's wallet is? If a trillion ISK is relevant or not in-game is decided by everyone's wallet, not by the richest guy's wallet. It has been said many times that the trillion ISK Somer received in the 2 give-aways combined could fund a major nullsec war for quite some time. It does not matter at all if Somer could do this with his own ISK (because that's legitimate sandbox stuff), it matters that CCP doesn't hand anyone the opportunity to do so. You took that out of context. We were talking about damage to the EvE economy (or rather lack thereof). The difference in the context you're speaking in, between SOMER and 'everyone else's wallet' is that SOMER had the vision, time, and dedication to organize, design, and program a huge out-of-game application used by a hell of a lot of capsuleers.
Murk Paradox wrote: Somer Blink is not a community site. It's a business.
Not it's not a business. It's makes fake play money. If I go around collecting up monopoly money for people to play games on my site I would not have to pay personal or corporate taxes to the state or federal government. Not a business. It's a game site, accessible to the EvE community. Thus, community site.
Murk Paradox wrote:Gogela wrote: Why don't you explain to me the difference between CCP contracting a community site, paying the developer in cash, and that developer turning around and buying a truckload of PLEX, and CCP just paying the community site developer in PLEX. Do it. What the hell is the difference?
That developer is not representing the community site. Just like you don't reward the construction crews who built John Hopkins for the awesome research done there by the doctors. ...uh no. The community site is representing the developer. Other way around. This doesn't address what I wrote. The construction crews who built that hospital/research center did not volunteer. They go paid real life money. ...and now they can buy PLEX if so inclined.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
213
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:15:00 -
[430] - Quote
Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg. |
|

Frostys Virpio
Lame Corp Name
730
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:39:00 -
[431] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
You say clearly here that they are an enterprise so giving them free stuff is indeed favoritism vs the other enterprise working in the same business. Isn't favoritism something you, as the creator of the sandbox, are not supposed to show so the sandbox stay a sandbox?
And remember,
CCP Guard wrote: We may make mistakes here an there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :)
If you want to thank enterprise that gives out money to help causes in any way, shape or form, go as the govt do and give them tax breaks just like corp IRL get when they give money away. Oh wait, you already do that by giving them free account. |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
425
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:43:00 -
[432] - Quote
TLDR: This looks like a clear cut case of favoritism and profiteering.
CCP Guard wrote: I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events.
This sentence shows that you are not really getting the point here Guard. Not today spaghetti. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2676
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:43:00 -
[433] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg. It is RMT... sort of. Just as PLEX is RMT. The difference between RMT that gets you banned and RMT that is sanctioned is who gets the money. If CCP gets it it's not bannable RMT. As a 3rd party affiliate, I would bet SOMER gets around 10% for the referral. ...just like gaming sites and others that advertise for EvE. So you are confused about key elements here... let's break it down.
STEP ONE: The Real money transaction. A player has 50 bucks or whatever GTCs go for. He goes to the SOMER site and says "hell yah I'm feeling lucky, I want to win a lot of ISK. I need a little ISK for seed money and this will totally work out." He buys a GTC from SOMER. || AT THIS POINT - The real money transaction is done. Now follow the money. CCP get's 90% and The Real Life SOMER (not game character) gets 10% for the affiliate referral or however they set it up. That's how internet advertising works. You want to sell stuff on a site I owned and I develop, you need to make it worth my while. So SOMER got his little RL cut but CCP gets the lion's share, and the player who bought the GTC has a GTC. Part of your confusion lies in this stage. As the site operator and real life human being, SOMER is not acting in this stage as a video game character. He's a person. This wasn't a video game transaction... it was a real one.
STEP TWO: The Conversion. Just as with a PLEX, the GTC has lost all of it's real money value now. It only had real money value at the time of the initial transaction, for which CCP raked in some dough. This GTC cannot be re-sold for real money. This is CCPs policy. The GTC, for it's entire existence, will always be controlled by CCPs policies. At this point in the process the purchaser of the GTC may submit it to the video game character known as SOMER. SOMER is not real here, and the transaction has nothing to do with real life cash. In fact, no matter what happens from here on out, the GTC will be burned at the next step and the rest of what happens with regards to the capsuleer's gambling addiction and SOMER scamming that poor fool out his ISK, there isn't going to be real money involved anymore.
Final: There is only one point in the transaction where real money comes into play. At that point in the transaction there are 3 real people involved. The person who created the video game character SOMER, the guy who created the capsuleer that needed the ISK, and CCP. These are real entites and CCP gets most of the money per normal business practices.
What happens afterwards is where some of you are confused. After the initial transaction real money is not involved. The initial transaction was the same as any PLEX purchase. The latter transaction are not transactions... they are games being played by spaceship barbies in an internet game. The inability of some players to make the differentiation between real life people and spaceship barbie is starting to blow my mind.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

The Legendary Soldier
Destruction for Hire
251
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 18:52:00 -
[434] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Doc Fury wrote:CCP Guard wrote:You said you still weren't clear on what SOMER did to deserve our attention. I replied to a similar question in this post . If there's anything more you'd like to know about it I can try but I really don't know how much more I can add. It was a judgement call at the time. This is what you said in that post: CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. That reply lacks specific details some of us keep asking you for. For whatever reason you continue to evade answering those questions directly. Please clarify your post quoted above: SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? SB's "capability" of doing what exactly? What "niche" exactly are you referring to? Does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using it can expect not to be scammed? if there are other considerations as you stated, could you please disclose any that relate directly to contributing to EVE players in their entirety? You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural. To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
There are five explicit questions there - which you have not deigned to answer. So, how exactly can you be not quite sure how you can clarify? Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Jack Sprate
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:04:00 -
[435] - Quote
CCP are watching what you do, not what you say.
Save your breath. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
263
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:12:00 -
[436] - Quote
Jack Sprate wrote: CCP are watching what you do, not what you say.
Save your breath.
Time to unsub folks. It's the only chance we have of being heard. |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4528
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:14:00 -
[437] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg.
Gogela gave a good long explanation.
The short one is this:
What you've just described is no different from buying a plex and turning it into in game stuff.
The RMT problem is taking isk or in game stuff and turning it back into personal, real life money. That isn't happening here.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
441
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:19:00 -
[438] - Quote
Remember during Monoclegate, when the uproar was over $90.0 monocles and $20.00 t-shirts that only our avatars could wear, and it had nothing to do with legitimate fears about the AUR Store selling items that could directly impact the game?
Once again, it's not about something being done in secrecy, it's because we don't like the price of something and thus we are wrong! So, who's going to be fired by Hilmar this time and used to try to make the players feel bad? Last time it was the community team, whom you threw under the bus to begin with. |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:21:00 -
[439] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg. Gogela gave a good long explanation. The short one is this: What you've just described is no different from buying a plex and turning it into in game stuff. The RMT problem is taking isk or in game stuff and turning it back into personal, real life money. That isn't happening here. Hello Troll and now SOMER alt.. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
102
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:25:00 -
[440] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators. And in doing so, they raise visibility of their site, bringing in more customers and making themselves more ISK. Sponsorship is not altruism; it is advertising. Yet it is still a good thing, unless you are saying that the 100 of billions isk they have used in sponsoring player driven events was worthless and that they should stop?
I'm not saying whether it is good or bad; I'm merely pointing out that the reward for sponsorship is increased revenue, and as such it is neither deserving of, nor an appropraite justification for, further community awards.
As someone else pointed out, if events sponsored by SOMER are such a good thing, why not reward the event organizers who put things together, rather than the sponsors? It's like giving superbowl rings to the companies running the halftime commercials rather than the players (not a perfect analogy, but you get the idea).
l0rd carlos wrote:Laughing Mime wrote: CCP still don't see what is wrong with financially supporting a for-profit gambling site.A casino is not a community service.
But where do you draw the line? If someone makes ISK by being a 3rd party on Super Traiding and sponsors community events to get more known, is that also "bad"?
Not necessarily "bad", but also not an action itself deserving of special rewards.
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
263
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:28:00 -
[441] - Quote
Tron 3K wrote:War Kitten wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg. Gogela gave a good long explanation. The short one is this: What you've just described is no different from buying a plex and turning it into in game stuff. The RMT problem is taking isk or in game stuff and turning it back into personal, real life money. That isn't happening here. Hello Troll and now SOMER alt..
They gave you 200m blink credits for some percentage of a GTC price. Blink credits can be redeemed for stuff. They just sold you stuff for cash. That is RMT.
Oh wait, you are a Somer alt and a troll... why am I bothering?
LOL. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:28:00 -
[442] - Quote
Gogela wrote:... Part of your confusion lies in this stage. As the site operator and real life human being, SOMER is not acting in this stage as a video game character. He's a person. This wasn't a video game transaction... it was a real one.... I'm pretty sure ALL the RM in ALL RMT goes to real life human being persons and not video game characters. That's sort of the whole point of RMT.
Gogela wrote:... This GTC cannot be re-sold for real money. This is CCPs policy... Unless you are Somer Blink.
Gogela wrote:... There is only one point in the transaction where real money comes into play. At that point in the transaction there are 3 real people involved. The person who created the video game character SOMER, the guy who created the capsuleer that needed the ISK, and CCP. These are real entites and CCP gets most of the money per normal business practices.
What happens afterwards is where some of you are confused. After the initial transaction real money is not involved. The initial transaction was the same as any PLEX purchase. The latter transaction are not transactions... they are games being played by spaceship barbies in an internet game. The inability of some players to make the differentiation between real life people and spaceship barbie is starting to blow my mind.
Let's compare buying a GTC from Markee Dragon via affiliate link on Somer Blink's website and buying a GTC from another retailer like Amazon.com. In both cases CCP gets the wholesale price of one GTC. In both cases the EVE player gets a GTC. But in the first case, the EVE player is also given ISK credit, separate from the GTC. This ISK credit has value, therefore some of the cash paid by the player was paid for that ISK, and the rest was paid for the GTC. Part of the transaction was effectively Somer Blink trading ISK to the player for cash. Now what makes that part of the transaction different than "bannable RMT"? Is it only because it is relatively small compared to the GTC sale that occurs at the same time? Because while CCP gets their money for the GTC part of the deal, they get nothing for the additional ISK sold with it. Now you may say the ISK credit is a free bonus, and that Somer Blink gets nothing for it in return, and that the only money they get is incidental ad revenue from ads on their website that just coincidentally happen to be for EVE time codes. If so then nothing I say is likely to change your mind. I have bought time codes from Markee Dragon, and I know why I did it.
|

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4530
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:30:00 -
[443] - Quote
Tron 3K wrote:War Kitten wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Ok so let me get this right
1. I buy a GTC from somer I get 200 blink credits to spend on the lotteries.
2. I use the blink credits and win in game stuff correct.
3. If I don't want the ship I can get a isk pay out.
4 Real money= blink credits= chance to win somer = prize is in game stuff
Holy **** how is this not RMT. CCP you have a third party exchanging real money for credits to play a lottery and win in game stuff. Who did ccp leave in charge of EVE. Wait that right there is no one at the helm. Now this not going to the CSM is making a lot of sense everyone work on eve is doing there own thing.
CCP Unifex please comeback the ship is sinking again. I know you are trying to carve out your notch at CCP but people are messing with the golden egg. Gogela gave a good long explanation. The short one is this: What you've just described is no different from buying a plex and turning it into in game stuff. The RMT problem is taking isk or in game stuff and turning it back into personal, real life money. That isn't happening here. Hello Troll and now SOMER alt..
If you think it so, it must be true. That's the bulk of the arguments I've seen in this thread.
Nevermind arguing against the points I actually make or recognizing facts for what they are. That's not how narrow-mindedness works is it?
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Din Chao
377
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:33:00 -
[444] - Quote
Sorry if this question has already been answered (though based on what I've read of this thread, nothing of substance has actually been answered):
What kind of transparency, if any, has SOMER Blink given to CCP as to how their "lottery" actually works? How does CCP know for certain that SOMER is running a legitimate operation and what guarantee do you have that they will continue running this way in the future? Is CCP privy to the specifics of the transactions between SOMER and the players? Who at CCP is working with SOMER to ensure that they are not cheating on their lotteries and/or stealing from the players? Does SOMER random = random?
If these are questions that can't be answered, than how can CCP officially endorse SOMER Blink, effectively legitimizing what may or may not be legitimate?
You say SOMER was selected because of EVE Vegas, and SOMER being a gambling site. But the state of Nevada has a Gaming Commission, a government entity, whose job is to guarantee, to the best of their ability, the "fairness" of gambling in their state. Does CCP have such oversight? |

Aryth
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1276
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:39:00 -
[445] - Quote
People have pointed it out earlier in the thread. Somer sponsors to generate free advertising and goodwill.
The very same reasons CCP sponsors Somer and other players. There is no altruism here it is all business. This is fine and is a proven business model. Mixing them together at the expense of the sandbox is the core issue.
Guidelines we can all agree on can make this all work. At no point do I think the greater playerbase would like for profit entities getting more profit from CCP. Reward them in other methods, limit direct wealth injection to non-profits if you do it at all. Caution in doing that at all should be the norm.
CCP has far too many tools at their disposal to need to do direct wealth injection. Skinning, vanity items (that do not have huge value), gametime directly on accounts, free advertising (they do this), real world items (hubs,tshirts,passes).
Wealth injection of any kind should be the absolute last resort when the other methods are not appropriate. There are just so many complications that can arise when you cross that line into the sandbox that it should be avoided in the vast majority of cases if not all. Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal. Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:42:00 -
[446] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:CCP Guard wrote: You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
Well, answering my direct questions INDIVIDUALLY with SPECIFIC answers instead of vague generalizations would satisfy me. Otherwise your responses thus far seem to be intentionally vague word crafting, and as such I am requesting that you be more specific.
Good luck; I asked for the same thing yesterday (specific, measurable reasons for the SOMER gifts), and that's the point at which Guard stopped responding to my posts.
Since CCP has had ample opportunity to present evidence to the contrary, and has failed to do so, my assumption at this point is that there are no specifics to be given, and that the choice of SOMER as a recipient was purely arbitrary.
I've made my decision; I'm discontinuing my recurring subscription. There is still time for CCP to change my mind, as I've got just over a month left, but at this point it is going to take some drastic measures and open honesty to brign me back. Lip service to an idea won't be nearly enough; there needs to be real change and real fixes for past mistakes before more of my money goes to CCP. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
57
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:45:00 -
[447] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events.
CCP Guard wrote:I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.
To revisit many, many other posters' replies: What were the specific criteria that were applied to selecting Somer as a test case? Total PLEX sales? Total site hits? Length of service? Recommendation of others? Random?
I think what's problematic for many people are the words "impression" and "feeling." I certainly understand the concept of exploring various ways to interact with the playerbase, but doing it on the basis of "feelings" is just weird. If you didn't have metrics on which to base a decision, it is baffling why you'd make a decision at all.
I'd like to point out that all of the major professional sports in the U.S. take extraordinary steps to steer clear of gambling and the gambling industry. Nothing tarnishes a sport more than the discovery that players shaved points or otherwise rigged the outcome of the game. European soccer might still be tied to such things, but now they're dealing with a worldwide cheating scandal as a result. CCP should avoid gambling like the plague unless they're looking forward to an eventual scandal. You'd think the AT shennanigans would have been proof enough. When players see CCP acting without clearly stated rules, these are the kinds of things they think of. I hate to beat a dead horse, but had safeguards been in place prior to the T20 incident, CCP would have a lot more goodwill to work with, and that alone should have made you cautious about giving out goodies without clearcut guidelines.
CCP Guard wrote:There's a lot of good projects and site we have yet to cover in the Community Spotlights and we can't do everyone at once.
What we've tried to do is focus on established things over brand new ones, but we've made exceptions in special cases for example when the Brave Newbies rose fast and hard because it was just such a good story. Timing is important (again) so if there's an upcoming event by someone we have on the back burner we may pull them up a few slots. Also we try to have diversity, not write about similar things week after week etc. But the selection method isn't highly developed or scientific and for something like this I don't think it can be, or that it has to be.
Everything, absolutely everything, that touches on the ingame world is part of the EVE metagame. Someone, somewhere is affected by these things. The Frog's competitors have every right to complain about it, and they should (but they haven't). As I said before, when the rules aren't clear, suspicion naturally follows.
You guys have built the only game I know of in which the rules of the game itself are mutable and part of the metagame. PvP at the design level and at the marketing level are part and parcel of this game. If you're handing out goodies, everyone is going to want some. That should have been obvious.
On the flip side, this leaves you guys in a very awkward place. I don't doubt that there are constant discussions about how to free yourselves from the tyrrany of the playerbase. I don't doubt that that attitude and those concerns drive much of what happened in this situation (e.g., who the hell are they to dictate business decisions to us!). What other company has tied their future so directly to the whims of soulless jackals who think they know everything? This is ultimately the problem that CCP has to solve. Dev tags or not, you're part of the sandbox too! |

War Kitten
Panda McLegion xXPlease Pandemic Citizens Reloaded Alliance.Xx
4530
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 19:54:00 -
[448] - Quote
Aryth wrote: ... CCP has far too many tools at their disposal to need to do direct wealth injection. Skinning, vanity items (that do not have huge value), gametime directly on accounts, free advertising (they do this), real world items (hubs,tshirts,passes).
Wealth injection of any kind should be the absolute last resort when the other methods are not appropriate. There are just so many complications that can arise when you cross that line into the sandbox that it should be avoided in the vast majority of cases if not all.
I find it ironic that this "direct wealth injection", the IWS, is merely a twiddle of a few numbers in a database for CCP, and that anything "trivial" like game time, t-shirts, mugs, and advertising all have real world value and cost to CCP.
I would also argue that a spaceship with a fancy paintjob is merely a vanity item.
If people stopped arbitrarily placing ridiculous value on nonsense items, there wouldn't be a problem with any wealth injection. Stop feeding the frenzy. You guys are all turning the IWS into the $1000 pair of jeans by buying into the idea of it being worth something more than it is.
I find that without a good mob to provide one for them, most people would have no mentality at all. |

Shai 'Hulud
64
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:01:00 -
[449] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:Aryth wrote: ... CCP has far too many tools at their disposal to need to do direct wealth injection. Skinning, vanity items (that do not have huge value), gametime directly on accounts, free advertising (they do this), real world items (hubs,tshirts,passes).
Wealth injection of any kind should be the absolute last resort when the other methods are not appropriate. There are just so many complications that can arise when you cross that line into the sandbox that it should be avoided in the vast majority of cases if not all.
I find it ironic that this "direct wealth injection", the IWS, is merely a twiddle of a few numbers in a database for CCP, and that anything "trivial" like game time, t-shirts, mugs, and advertising all have real world value and cost to CCP. I would also argue that a spaceship with a fancy paintjob is merely a vanity item. If people stopped arbitrarily placing ridiculous value on nonsense items, there wouldn't be a problem with any wealth injection. Stop feeding the frenzy. You guys are all turning the IWS into the $1000 pair of jeans by buying into the idea of it being worth something more than it is. Where do you get arbitrary? Stuff is worth what it is worth for a number of reasons, it's not arbitrary.
And the market value of these items was not unknown at the time of the gift. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
263
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:04:00 -
[450] - Quote
Even is SOMER has been completely honest and legit up until today, the point is this is EVE and if they want to wake up tomorrow and scam the crap out of everyone and walk away with a day's take - they CAN. And CCP shouldn't be involved if that happens. But the community devs simply don't get it.
And if SOMERblink does scam everyone at some point, CCP is now responsible since they sanction them as trustworthy.
So will CCP then undo the damage and return the isk everyone was scammed out of? That would be unprecedented.
The point is, they are an in game entity, CCP shouldn't be supporting them. The biggest argument CCP devs have for supporting them is that they have a lot of isk and spread it around. That is influence peddling. At this point, CCP Guard and the other community devs can not be trusted, as they are basically being influenced by the isk that SOMERblink tosses around.
CCP shouldn't be promoting/supporting any in game entity to the extent that they have SOMERblink. But the devs won't admit that.
The only real hope now is someone with a bit more insight and business ethics knowledge to intervene from higher up in CCP.
I've already unsubbed all my extra accounts, keeping what I need to run my corp for now. I suggest others start unsubbing as well, it's perhaps the only thing that will get noticed by someone who can make a difference. |
|

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
564
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:05:00 -
[451] - Quote
Sai Talos wrote:Those of you calling SOMER's contributions to the Eve community into question, lets make one thing clear:
They have time and time again sponsored people and organizations who create content for our community so they can continue creating content without the need to make ISK. If you're wondering, just ask a SOMER employee what all they have sponsored.
Needed to clear the air there.
And no, I'm not a SOMER employee, and I'm out tens of billions thanks to them ;)
Edit: And you know what, CCP hasn't gifted me anything for the hundreds of hours I've spent editing videos, but that doesn't give me the right to throw rocks at them for trying to give back to content creators.
Coat tailing is not legitimate content creation. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Din Chao
380
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:15:00 -
[452] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Even is SOMER has been completely honest and legit up until today, the point is this is EVE and if they want to wake up tomorrow and scam the crap out of everyone and walk away with a day's take - they CAN. And CCP shouldn't be involved if that happens. But the community devs simply don't get it.
And if SOMERblink does scam everyone at some point, CCP is now responsible since they sanction them as trustworthy. Exactly. Imagine what would have happened if CCP had officially endorsed EBank. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:24:00 -
[453] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I've answered this but I can clarify. It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. This mixed into a feeling that we should contact them and do stuff with them around EVE Vegas and upcoming tournaments. One thing we are doing more of and looking to do more of is E-sports and online tournaments and if you look at any team sport today you see a lot of betting sites doing sponsorship as that makes sense in sports...so it's just a relationship that we wanted to explore and which we will continue exploring. Doesn't take away from anything other people are doing that is totally different and brings a different kind of value to our universe.
One scams the playerbase for isk using Lotteries and engages in RMT using isk tokens. The other scams the playerbase for real money to be buried in side projects while halting the game's development while turning a blind eye on RMT.
Another great partnership brought to you by CCP Marketing 2013 |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
565
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:41:00 -
[454] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:No one is arguing against somers - or anyone elses - ability to try and make a profit. That is basically what this entire game is about - ruthless space capitalism. Yes they are. The words "For profit" are creeping into many arguments as if it was an evil thing. Quote: What we object to are the creators of the game unfairly and arbitrarily stepping in and granting their personal favourites massive advantages to their business or massive personal rewards for succeeding in the game.
How is it unfair and arbitrary? CCP has explained a couple times why they rewarded the SCL and SOMER employees with these fake spaceships with different paintjobs. Success breeds success and should be rewarded. Failure shouldn't be rewarded or subsidized. That just encourages more failure. (Welfare anyone?) Random lotteries shouldn't be the way to recognize people - does anyone think Joe Schmoe who got his name picked out of a hat is worthy of a reward? No - he just got lucky. Nobody gives a damn. Success is what should be recognized and rewarded.
There is nothing wrong with being a skunk.
There is nothing wrong about being a cat.
There is something wrong with calling a skunk a cat. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:47:00 -
[455] - Quote
Btw guyz, dont forget to buy more PLEX here. Oh wait... no here |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
565
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:49:00 -
[456] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Additionally, why can't the "meaningful" rewards be ones that don't give a direct in-game advantage over other players? A scorpion... marginally useful by itself....with lesser stats than other scorpions.... and a fancy paintjob. Oh big in-game advantage there. The only value is the rarity, and that's a value that can be made liquid and useful a few times only. Once the collectors have the 1 they "NEED" for their collection, who else is that ship worth billions of isk to really? The Mona Lisa is valuable because there is one of it. 132 exact duplicates of the Mona Lisa are not worth 132x as much as the one Mona Lisa. Quote: How about a non-transferable t-shirt for your char that has "SOMER" stamped on it? How about a USB rifter hub?
You understand that rewards can be meaningful and fair at the same time, yes?
An out of game reward can be sold on ebay and turned into plex too. What's the difference?
There is nothing wrong with scavenging your own trophies.
But that's not the case here is it? You have shown that you obviously care about the value inherit in this discussion....
So, if we were take "value" to it... why didn't CCP just hand over 150 isk then? Screw the hull, give them the value of it.
Or rather, why NOT the rifter usb, even they ebay it then?
Yeah, let's go with your idea. We should give them rifter usb dongles instead.
Good idea. Much better than just yet another mona lisa. This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

Murk Paradox
Duty. The Cursed Few
565
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:50:00 -
[457] - Quote
War Kitten wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:War Kitten wrote:You're right... everyone should get a blue ribbon and a plaque for participation.
Trophies for everyone!
That would be meaningful.
That's not what I said at all. Creating strawman arguments just makes you look like a troll. You claimed anyone could do this and get the same 'reward' - and I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things. That is me demonstrating that your statements are false. Please be mature It's not a straw man if you present the same argument again in your reply. TheGunslinger42 wrote: I'm pointing out that others have done these same things and not been treat the same way or been given the same things.
That right there is exactly what I'm replying to. "We made a website too, where's our free stuff?" "We played football too, where's our trophy for participating?" You have to win. You may not know ahead of time what the criteria is for winning in this case, but I guarantee you it doesn't include whining about the others who have won. Relevant.
But community sites are not competition. They are there for the betterment of Eve.
The fact you compete in the first place is proof as to why they wouldn't fit.
Thanks for proving our point though =)
This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |

sally Deninard
mss industry
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 20:59:00 -
[458] - Quote
Ok Guard i`m gonna be real simple about this because if I ask politely the question doesn`t get f%^&i% answered.
The CSM had pre warned you that not everybody in EVE could participate in the blink and asked you to add functions into the lottery.
CCP knew the blink lottery was skewed and still let it go ahead.
WHY THE HELL DID YOU LET A TILTED LOTTERY GO AHEAD?????
It seemed to me at the time that CCP was more interested in protecting SOMERS public image than their own?
But 1 more last time....
CSM said the draw was flawed , why did you let it run? |

StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 21:00:00 -
[459] - Quote
People are forgetting that blink makes a cut of successful transactions through 3rd party sales through referrals. Since somer has more isk than anybody knows wha to do with- what can they do with it in game? The answer is nothing. What about out of game? Well, if somer could find a way to offload his extra isk as cash, then he'd be sitting pretty.
This is exactly what he is doing. He is losing out on 200m isk for each successful plex sale and pocketing a percentage of the Cash transaction(through mar dragon). Since he is providing a plex for the same cost as ccp- but giving the purchaser +200m isk over current market value- who wouldn't take advantage of this?
Somer is losing 200m isk for every plex purchase through their site, but gaining real money. Convenient way to offload a basically worthless supply of infinite isk?
This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.
The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting. |

Xtreem
Knockaround Guys Inc. Sin City Coalition
168
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 21:20:00 -
[460] - Quote
Thanks for the update.
Something that has annoyed alot of traders myself included is that previously when ships have been given out it was always kept at that number and more were not subsequently given out again so people could trade the commodity.
I and others will be out some considerable ISK as the change in the giving out of unique was not communicated. |
|

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:03:00 -
[461] - Quote
Xtreem wrote:Thanks for the update.
Something that has annoyed alot of traders myself included is that previously when ships have been given out it was always kept at that number and more were not subsequently given out again so people could trade the commodity.
I and others will be out some considerable ISK as the change in the giving out of unique was not communicated. it was communicated. to somer and employees. i believe they call what happened insider trading. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:05:00 -
[462] - Quote
StuckAtTheLock wrote: This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.
The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.
Well, look at it on the bright side. At least you have puppets like the CSM members and CCP Guard being sent to this thread by the chief marketing officer and company stakeholders to try and pour some water in the fire, just to close themselves in hearts and back out again when the real matters start being discussed  |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:07:00 -
[463] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Pingu wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? Montmazar wrote:In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense. *sigh* CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law. Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should. Greed is good. CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them. Can SOMERblink legally give away prizes that have real cash value in the "real world"? These items are subject to taxes in the United States and there are other laws regarding their distribution that have the potential to be violated as well. What is the mailing address for SOMERblink should I have a grievance? Who can I call? If what you say about icelandic law is true, then is SOMERblink being used as a dummy corporation in order to circumvent Icelandic law? Sounds crazy, but if CCP can't run the auction because of Icelandic law, and instead they use a corporation that only REALLY exists in a game they created to run the same auction... well yeah, that's sketchy no? Not sure if that whole "Icelandic Law" thing is true tho to be fair. Frankly I am surprised any US based member of SOMER would want the attention of this because if they are paid enough game time/isk as 'payment in kind' it also could be subject to taxes (although I admit I am not an accountant, so correct me if I am wrong). Why not have the casino help run the lottery for the items? They can legally raffle off whatever they want, and have actual "out of game" credentials to do so. Or why not the EVE Vegas folks themselves? The point is, CCP screwed up bad by getting into bed with SOMER and the only acceptable course of action is to get out. Going ahead with this lottery through SOMER, is a bad path to go down. Yet all we get from devs is "but... but... but...". No confidence here.
Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/
I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes:
-According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, GÇ£it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on oneGÇÖs premises."
-For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden.
(see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 )
Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.
|

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:07:00 -
[464] - Quote
So what I'm seeing here is CCP answering what EVERYONE said was the "key problem" of the secrecy SOMER asked their employees to use when selling the ships. Now they've answered that in a conclusive fashion, everyone has now decided that the secrecy actually wasn't the problem (because CCP answered and the drama over it is over) it's now about the value of the ships.
Make your fricking minds up.
As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
As Guard said, if your problem is that it's a "for-profit" site then nothing anyone says or does will satisfy your prejudice against them. If your problem is that 30 of the ships were given out, then who out of the 30 SOMER employees does CCP not give a ship to? All the bleating about SOMER favouritism and no-one has mentioned that BIG Lottery got one of these ships given to them earlier in the year. I'm guessing that it wasn't made a biog deal of because they're so much smaller than SOMER and it therefore went under the radar to a large degree. Why were they given a ship before their much more successful competitor? Perhaps because CCP wanted to help them grow - thus giving THEM an advantage over their competitors?
As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?)
CCP has answered all the relevant questions and inferred the answers for most others. Yes, I'm white-knighting CCP here but not because I think they need it - more because there's a lot of hate being spewed about for something that CCP has already answered to a satisfactory level for anyone that can read and reason. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:15:00 -
[465] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!" Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2679
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:16:00 -
[466] - Quote
Careby wrote:Gogela wrote:... This GTC cannot be re-sold for real money. This is CCPs policy... Unless you are Somer Blink. There you go confusing a spaceship barbie with a real human being again. The guy that created the character "SOMER"... the human being, has an affiliate arrangement of some type with CCP. I guarantee you CCP is getting the bulk of any RL money being processed. Every. Time. It has nothing to do with SOMER the spaceship barbie. Spaceship barbie SOMER only trades in GTCs and ISK. The real life human being behind him may sell GTCs on CCP's behalf, by their guidelines, for a tiny fraction of what goes to CCP. As I said, that's how a lot of internet marketing works. I thought by making the spaceship barbie analogy I'd get through... guess I need to go look for posterboard, a hand puppet, and a box of crayons.
Careby wrote:Gogela wrote:... There is only one point in the transaction where real money comes into play. At that point in the transaction there are 3 real people involved. The person who created the video game character SOMER, the guy who created the capsuleer that needed the ISK, and CCP. These are real entites and CCP gets most of the money per normal business practices.
What happens afterwards is where some of you are confused. After the initial transaction real money is not involved. The initial transaction was the same as any PLEX purchase. The latter transaction are not transactions... they are games being played by spaceship barbies in an internet game. The inability of some players to make the differentiation between real life people and spaceship barbie is starting to blow my mind. Let's compare buying a GTC from Markee Dragon via affiliate link on Somer Blink's website and buying a GTC from another retailer like Amazon.com. In both cases CCP gets the wholesale price of one GTC. In both cases the EVE player gets a GTC. But in the first case, the EVE player is also given ISK credit, separate from the GTC. This ISK credit has value, therefore some of the cash paid by the player was paid for that ISK, and the rest was paid for the GTC. Part of the transaction was effectively Somer Blink trading ISK to the player for cash. Now what makes that part of the transaction different than "bannable RMT"? Is it only because it is relatively small compared to the GTC sale that occurs at the same time? Because while CCP gets their money for the GTC part of the deal, they get nothing for the additional ISK sold with it. Now you may say the ISK credit is a free bonus, and that Somer Blink gets nothing for it in return, and that the only money they get is incidental ad revenue from ads on their website that just coincidentally happen to be for EVE time codes. If so then nothing I say is likely to change your mind. I have bought time codes from Markee Dragon, and I know why I did it. Here, I concede you have a point. I didn't know about that credit and you didn't mention it. I just checked SOMER's site and this is what it says:
Quote:You must click an affiliate button and complete your purchase in the same browser to receive credit. You can use any browser, not just the IGB.
You will receive 200M Blink credit for each 60-Day GTC (100M credit for 30-Day GTCs). I've made thousands in RL from affiliate links. That part is just normal business on the net. Paying people additional ISK on top of the GTC for RL cash is bannable RMT according to CCPs policy. If SOMER were offering the additional ISK as part of the GTC trade in it would not be RMT, because it's on the Blink side of the transaction and there's no money involved. If you want to pay a premium in ISK for PLEX or GTCs that's your prerogative. However, now that I understand SOMER's affiliate relationship a bit better from seeing the site, I have to concede this point. Offering ISK for clicking on an affiliate link is RMT. There's no getting around it. I could do the same thing. I could put an affiliate link on my site and offer 300 million isk to click my affiliate link and buy PLEX. I could commodify my entire EvE online account if I did that. ...and that is exactly what SOMER is doing.
Crap.
Well guys. Let's test the water and find out what's going on here.
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?
                               ![]() Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Din Chao
380
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:17:00 -
[467] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok? |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:24:00 -
[468] - Quote
Pingu wrote:Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes: -According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, GÇ£it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on oneGÇÖs premises." -For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden. (see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 ) Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.
That's what their legal team is working on right now - measuring any possible litigations that can arise from having this lottery service "hosted" inside the game. The isk tokens RMT they can just turn the blind eye on the EULA section that forbids it, it's their game they are the rulemakers and can do whatever they want. |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:25:00 -
[469] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok?
Thanks for proving my point about using reason.
Rather than making a valid and reasoned response, you vilify me for having an opinion. GF m8. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:28:00 -
[470] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Din Chao wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok? Thanks for proving my point about using reason. Rather than making a valid and reasoned response, you vilify me for having an opinion. GF m8. i believe he was highlighting that you're operating on emotion rather than logic. 'believe' 'hope' 'seem' have no place in this discussion. we are seeking clear and concise answers, not vague reasoning and evasive wording |
|

Din Chao
382
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:30:00 -
[471] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Din Chao wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok? Thanks for proving my point about using reason. Rather than making a valid and reasoned response, you vilify me for having an opinion. GF m8. I didn't vilify you for having an opinion. I mocked your declaration of blind faith that you somehow think is a "reasoned response."
And I'm sorry if you think "having an opinion" excludes this opinion from ridicule. |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:32:00 -
[472] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!"
You missed the point where BIG Lottery got given the ship months before to promote their site.
Although I don't have facts and figures, I *can* categorically say that none of my friends in-game heard about BIG getting one of these ships (or any other promotions they've ever run) but everyone in my corp heard about SOMER's. Does that necessartily mean that BIG is inherently inferior to SOMER? NO. All it means is that more people have heard of and use SOMER than BIG.
As I postulated before, perhaps that added visibility was the reason SOMER was chosen this time around. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:36:00 -
[473] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!" You missed the point where BIG Lottery got given the ship months before to promote their site. Although I don't have facts and figures, I *can* categorically say that none of my friends in-game heard about BIG getting one of these ships (or any other promotions they've ever run) but everyone in my corp heard about SOMER's. Does that necessartily mean that BIG is inherently inferior to SOMER? NO. All it means is that more people have heard of and use SOMER than BIG. As I postulated before, perhaps that added visibility was the reason SOMER was chosen this time around. so, they recieved free 15bil (more like 20bil as that was the price during their insider trading period) ships for personal use (read: selling for profit) because they're the most visible. is that what you're saying? |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:37:00 -
[474] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Shad Duken wrote:Din Chao wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As for the "RMT" issue, I believe CCP has looked into it - or I hope so anyway - because they seem 100% positive that there has been no RMTing from SOMER. You hear that guys? Shad Duken "believes" and "hopes" CCP has looked into it because they "seem" like they think there isn't anything shady going on with SOMER. So shut up, ok? Thanks for proving my point about using reason. Rather than making a valid and reasoned response, you vilify me for having an opinion. GF m8. I didn't vilify you for having an opinion. I mocked your declaration of blind faith that you somehow think is a "reasoned response." And I'm sorry if you think "having an opinion" excludes this opinion from ridicule.
Whereas you believe that SOMER (but oddly not BIG, it seems) are RMTing with no proof other than your belief. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
242
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:38:00 -
[475] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:So what I'm seeing here is CCP answering what EVERYONE said was the "key problem" of the secrecy SOMER asked their employees to use when selling the ships. Now they've answered that in a conclusive fashion, everyone has now decided that the secrecy actually wasn't the problem (because CCP answered and the drama over it is over) it's now about the value of the ships.
Make your fricking minds up. Take off those reality distortion goggles please. You're free to read the earlier threadnaughts about the non-secret give-aways. Also many people have said that secrecy was a problem, but not the main problem of this other give-away. NB: CCP has not answered the secrecy issue in a conclusive fashion because they have not yet explained how not making these give-aways public is justified.
Quote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase. As several other people have said, that's a terrible reason to hand out dev support to anyone.
Quote:As Guard said, if your problem is that it's a "for-profit" site then nothing anyone says or does will satisfy your prejudice against them. You're exactly right, if by "against them" you actually mean "against them receiving CCP support".
Quote:If your problem is that 30 of the ships were given out, then who out of the 30 SOMER employees does CCP not give a ship to? All 30 of them obviously. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:43:00 -
[476] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:StuckAtTheLock wrote: This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.
The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.
Well, look at it on the bright side. At least you have puppets like the CSM members and CCP Guard being sent to this thread by the chief marketing officer and company stakeholders to try and pour some water in the fire, just to close themselves in hearts and back out again when the real matters start being discussed 
Well this is not the case. I have been spewing venomon on my coms and in trebors ear from days. DNSBlack is pissed Argus is pissed. CSM can only act on what CCP presents them. Trebor is repping us well believe me and seeing Ripard blog today says they are starting to get it. Don't blame the CSM for a CCP screw up. I have yet to read a post by a CSM member that has pissed me off if you have one that sides with CCP please show me. Ripards been given a pass so please don't link his initial step out of the sandbox
But by all means keep up the posting; I have enjoyed reading my fellow sandbox players dissenting opinions. The sad part is I truly care about these CCP employees as friends so all of this is very painful for me. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:46:00 -
[477] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!" You missed the point where BIG Lottery got given the ship months before to promote their site. Although I don't have facts and figures, I *can* categorically say that none of my friends in-game heard about BIG getting one of these ships (or any other promotions they've ever run) but everyone in my corp heard about SOMER's. Does that necessartily mean that BIG is inherently inferior to SOMER? NO. All it means is that more people have heard of and use SOMER than BIG. As I postulated before, perhaps that added visibility was the reason SOMER was chosen this time around.
Actually, I was referring more to the unique ships given to use as lottery prizes, but nice try though. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:50:00 -
[478] - Quote
Must be tough for CSM'ers and Guard to run errands giving out the body to the manifest and trying to clean up the sh*t others make    |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 22:58:00 -
[479] - Quote
Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Shad Duken wrote:As several other people have said, SOMER were chosen primarily because they are, without any shadow of a doubt, THE most successful lottery site in EVE history. They may not be the longest running, but they've definitely made the most of what they've created. CCP have obviously looked at that success and said "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's use them to give out some stuff" because they have the capability of doing it and it getting to the largest playerbase.
It was more like, "Hey, they're the clear market leader, so let's cement that position by giving them a distinct advantage over their competition and drive even more people to their site. Oh, and an official endorsement of their reliability would help too!" You missed the point where BIG Lottery got given the ship months before to promote their site. Although I don't have facts and figures, I *can* categorically say that none of my friends in-game heard about BIG getting one of these ships (or any other promotions they've ever run) but everyone in my corp heard about SOMER's. Does that necessartily mean that BIG is inherently inferior to SOMER? NO. All it means is that more people have heard of and use SOMER than BIG. As I postulated before, perhaps that added visibility was the reason SOMER was chosen this time around. so, they recieved free 15bil (more like 20bil as that was the price during their insider trading period) ships for personal use (read: selling for profit) because they're the most visible. is that what you're saying?
Interesting question. I can only guess because none of us know 100% for sure (including the CSM unfortunately) that if you cut out all the layers of 'they've done this or that' then the answer to this may well be YES.
If you look further than the base-line answer at the reason they're so visible (prior to CCP Navigator's "Official Seal of Approval" - which is my only concern over this whole thing) then it's pretty easy to see why CCP is rewarding them.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
221
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:00:00 -
[480] - Quote
I would not want to have CCPGuards Job right now. But I will not let anyone wreck what has been created and maintained for 10 years. My only wish is if CCPGuard would call me on my phone so I could stop all this typing but I know he cant. I truly suck at this typing **** |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:00:00 -
[481] - Quote
Bottom line is - the shots at CCP are called by people whose ultimate goal is to come up with the ultimate ways to rip you off. Hence the lack of transparency. They cannot tell you directly that they wanna rip you off, because if they did, the chances of accomplishing it would be diminuted  |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:05:00 -
[482] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote: Actually, I was referring more to the unique ships given to use as lottery prizes, but nice try though.
As in the G-Vex/Gold Magnate issue that has been dealt with by their removal from the promotion? Yes, that was a massive mess created by CCP not thinking things through, but they dealt with it promptly and conclusively (at least as far as the prizes themselves matter) |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:10:00 -
[483] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote: Actually, I was referring more to the unique ships given to use as lottery prizes, but nice try though.
As in the G-Vex/Gold Magnate issue that has been dealt with by their removal from the promotion? Yes, that was a massive mess created by CCP not thinking things through, but they dealt with it promptly and conclusively (at least as far as the prizes themselves matter)
No, it hasn't been dealt with. The prizes were not the issue; it was the huge uptick in traffic to SOMER Blink's website by people trying to get those prizes. SOMER made a killing off of that lottery, for no other reason than they were favored by CCP. And this was done to the detriment of any other EVE gambling site that is in competition with SOMER.
CCP tipped the scales of the in-game competion, and that balance has not been restored by their PR platitudes. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

FuzzyButt
I Swear She Was 18 Li3 Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:14:00 -
[484] - Quote
But i tought Somer was like Robin Hood? =) |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:16:00 -
[485] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote: No, it hasn't been dealt with. The prizes were not the issue; it was the huge uptick in traffic to SOMER Blink's website by people trying to get those prizes. SOMER made a killing off of that lottery, for no other reason than they were favored by CCP. And this was done to the detriment of any other EVE gambling site that is in competition with SOMER.
CCP tipped the scales of the in-game competion, and that balance has not been restored by their PR platitudes.
Like they did with BIG 6 months ago without all this drama. Any explanation for that?
Edit: Just realised you were likely talking about the uptick in traffic due to the originally proposed prizes.
Yes, like I said that was a mistake by CCP. One that was impossible to change despite withdrawing the problem ships.
Anyone who has never made a mistake that can't be changed because it was too late, please raise your hands.... what, nobody? Well, who'd have thunk it? |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
15
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:29:00 -
[486] - Quote
I want to know why Somer isnt banned for RMT. He is converting isk value into real world currency value.
If CCP can confirm that his operation is legit, maybe more of us can get a slice of the cake?
How about, I make a website with the following rules:
1) I will sell you a 'Ladybird' bundle, that includes 1 plex and 1 ladybird token.
2) I receive real cash for this sale, and make real profit in my pocket.
3) You may use your ladybird token to buy ships from my Jita hanger, one token is worth 200m equivelent.
All good CCP?
Also, has anyone read the first response to the OP? It literally hits the nail right on the head and asks all the pertinent questions. It was totally ignored. TOTALLY.
the other thing is, the reason CCP probably isnt in trouble with the Gambling authorities is probably because this conduct in eve hasnt been reported formally yet. |

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:30:00 -
[487] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:34:00 -
[488] - Quote
StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash.
It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:37:00 -
[489] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. blink credit = isk |

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:43:00 -
[490] - Quote
Since you can cash out blink credit, I believe the proverbial line is crossed.
I mean, if CCP wants to do a vodoo-raindance around that fine line - well, I'd pay to see that. |
|

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:48:00 -
[491] - Quote
Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote:StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. blink credit = isk
Blink credit = blink credit.
The fact that it's portrayed in isk value is irrelevant. It's being used for ease of reference. They could equally use Ladybirds as the named currency, but that would confuse everyone.
Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk. |

Mitch's Forum Alt
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:52:00 -
[492] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote: Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
sure they can. it's called buying every single ticket on a blink and cashing out the prize. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
221
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:53:00 -
[493] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote:StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. blink credit = isk Blink credit = blink credit. The fact that it's portrayed in isk value is irrelevant. It's being used for ease of reference. They could equally use Ladybirds as the named currency, but that would confuse everyone. Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
Sorry this is not true and if I need to spell it out then I will ( Shill accounts and Somer playing their own game). But please stop |

Shai 'Hulud
67
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:54:00 -
[494] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:So what I'm seeing here is CCP answering what EVERYONE said was the "key problem" of the secrecy SOMER asked their employees to use when selling the ships. Now they've answered that in a conclusive fashion, everyone has now decided that the secrecy actually wasn't the problem (because CCP answered and the drama over it is over) it's now about the value of the ships.
If you secretly do something that is ok, and people find out about it, no one cares.
If you secretly do something that is not ok, and people find out about it, they care.
Personally, I have never placed much on the fact that it was done in secret. The bigger gift was done openly anyways. I think many (like myself) didn't hear about the BIG gift because it obviously didn't get as much press.
If you do something horrible, but with full transparency ... it's still horrible. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:56:00 -
[495] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote:StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. blink credit = isk Blink credit = blink credit. The fact that it's portrayed in isk value is irrelevant. It's being used for ease of reference. They could equally use Ladybirds as the named currency, but that would confuse everyone. Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
The point here is that an incentive to buy something external to EVE with ISK, the games internal currency, as a potential reward is present. |

Montmazar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.11 23:56:00 -
[496] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:[quote=Mitch's Forum Alt][quote=Shad Duken][quote=StabThigh][quote=Shad Duken]
Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
It doesn't matter if it's direct or not.
One more step (gamble) is still a lot more direct than most RMT methods.
Also one thing not being mentioned yet - in the real world, gambling is an easy and effective way to launder money. I don't know exactly how blink works, because I have a math degree and also gambling is boring, but so long as there is a way to put in dirty space money and get out clean space goods, that is a vector for easy laundering of botted or other illegitimately acquired space money. Now, maybe CCP works closely with Somer to monitor and prevent this, or to ensure procedures are in place to make such laundering difficult or impossible. That may be. But that is an even deeper business relationship than has yet been disclosed. So it's either that, or CCP is turning a blind eye to space money laundering option because they are getting cash from them via gambling addicts buying plex. So what is it, CCP? Are you working closer with Blink than you have told us (likely, as that would explain why you are so confident it's not a scam), or are you just ignoring the threat it would otherwise pose to your in-game security options in order to enjoy the cash they funnel in? |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:00:00 -
[497] - Quote
Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
sure they can. it's called buying every single ticket on a blink and cashing out the prize.
You are *trying* to win a ship/several ships, but you can't guarantee getting all the tickets - and therefore can't guarantee winning the blink.
You may win enough ships to get some of the blink credit converted back to ships, which you can then convert to isk, but unless you're extremely lucky you won't convert it all. The lottery and potential ship win isn't "Have Blink credit, therefore have isk". |

StabThigh
Amarrshmellow
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:01:00 -
[498] - Quote
Yes, as others have stated - just because you can't click a magic button that deposits blink cred to you eve wallet doesn't mean that you can't turn that credit into isk buy purchasing all tickets on a blink.
I mean, if you went to purchase isk on an RMT site and they made you create an account on their site to convert 'gold->isk', it would be the same amount of steps that somer has on his site to convert RMT blink cred to isk. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:06:00 -
[499] - Quote
Somer situation:
Step 1: Sell a plex + blink credit for CASH
Step 2: Redeem GAME ITEMS for blink credits
My proposal:
Step 1: Sell main for isk on character bazaar
Step 2: Buy GAME ITEMS for said isk
Step 2: Sell a paperclip + ladybird tokens for CASH
Step 3: Redeem GAME ITEMS for Ladybird credits
My issue
How is it, 99% of the eve player base can see that injecting hundreds of billions of isk into Somerblink for providing a Online Gambling is outragous, and seemingly not a single CCP employee deviates from thinking Somer is altruistic and deserves help, not to mention relentless vouches |

Shai 'Hulud
67
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:10:00 -
[500] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
sure they can. it's called buying every single ticket on a blink and cashing out the prize. You are *trying* to win a ship/several ships, but you can't guarantee getting all the tickets - and therefore can't guarantee winning the blink. You may win enough ships to get some of the blink credit converted back to ships, which you can then convert to isk, but unless you're extremely lucky you won't convert it all. The lottery and potential ship win isn't "Have Blink credit, therefore have isk". Montmazar doesn't play SOMER "because he has a math degree." In other words, anyone who understands much math at all realizes that lotteries (particularly small lotteries) are a losing game for the players. But this is under the case that one has to actually pay for the tickets. If you are gifted the tickets, say as a bonus for using a certain affiliate gtc link, then that changes the math rather drastically.
Sure, there is basically an exchange rate converting the SOMER credit back to isk. Do not fool yourself into thinking it's not reliable though, particularly with smaller lotteries. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:14:00 -
[501] - Quote
Let's take a look at what the EULA has to say about it:
EVE Online-« End User License Agreement
6. CONDUCT
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. |

Montmazar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:15:00 -
[502] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Somer situation:
How is it, 99% of the eve player base can see that injecting hundreds of billions of isk into Somerblink for providing a Online Gambling is outragous, and seemingly not a single CCP employee deviates from thinking Somer is altruistic and deserves help, not to mention relentless vouches
CCP Guard has been careful to not mention altruism or concrete reasons for support (leaving that to the more clueless, yet eager CSM). I think it is becoming blatantly clear that the reason they support Somer is due to having a positive business interest in them. And that is a conflict of interest.
And for everyone saying "this doesn't affect my corner of the sandbox" - how many titans and supercarriers do you think Somer and his employes now fly with their alts in various alliances in this game? Probably more than one. Probably a lot more than one. Somer and its employees have been gifted enough space money to make a very real impact on nullsec, lowsec, or the market via their alts. |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:15:00 -
[503] - Quote
What is the real life cash payment for selling a GTC? |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:18:00 -
[504] - Quote
Montmazar wrote: Also one thing not being mentioned yet - in the real world, gambling is an easy and effective way to launder money. I don't know exactly how blink works, because I have a math degree and also gambling is boring, but so long as there is a way to put in dirty space money and get out clean space goods, that is a vector for easy laundering of botted or other illegitimately acquired space money. Now, maybe CCP works closely with Somer to monitor and prevent this, or to ensure procedures are in place to make such laundering difficult or impossible. That may be. But that is an even deeper business relationship than has yet been disclosed. So it's either that, or CCP is turning a blind eye to space money laundering option because they are getting cash from them via gambling addicts buying plex. So what is it, CCP? Are you working closer with Blink than you have told us (likely, as that would explain why you are so confident it's not a scam), or are you just ignoring the threat it would otherwise pose to your in-game security options in order to enjoy the cash they funnel in?
Valid point but one addressed by CCP's anti-botting campaign. I can't really see any way they could guarantee the exact origin of any isk.
Chances are, we all have a little bot money sat mixed in with our isk - not because we've personally done it or because we are being used to launder isk, but because they will have put that isk into the market at one point or another (placement). That money used by the botters to buy x item is then part of a legitimate transaction (layering) and the seller is none the wiser they are now using illegally gained isk to purchase whatever they spend their isk on (integration). That isk then moves around as apparently clean money, despite it's actual origin. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3838
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:22:00 -
[505] - Quote
Montmazar wrote: CCP Guard has been careful to not mention altruism or concrete reasons for support (leaving that to the more clueless, yet eager CSM). I think it is becoming blatantly clear that the reason they support Somer is due to having a positive business interest in them. And that is a conflict of interest.
Exactly. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
105
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:24:00 -
[506] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote: No, it hasn't been dealt with. The prizes were not the issue; it was the huge uptick in traffic to SOMER Blink's website by people trying to get those prizes. SOMER made a killing off of that lottery, for no other reason than they were favored by CCP. And this was done to the detriment of any other EVE gambling site that is in competition with SOMER.
CCP tipped the scales of the in-game competion, and that balance has not been restored by their PR platitudes.
Like they did with BIG 6 months ago without all this drama. Any explanation for that? Edit: Just realised you were likely talking about the uptick in traffic due to the originally proposed prizes. Yes, like I said that was a mistake by CCP. One that was impossible to change despite withdrawing the problem ships. Anyone who has never made a mistake that can't be changed because it was too late, please raise your hands.... what, nobody? Well, who'd have thunk it?
Frankly, the replacement prizes were at least as bad as, if not worse than, the originally proposed prizes - they were something brand new and guaranteed unique; the SOMER lottery would be the only way to ever win one.
For anyone who doesn't know what "uptick" I'm talking about, it can be seen here (from SOMER Blink's own site tracking of Blink activity at the time the EVE Vegas giveaways were announced). It's pretty clear that this announcement had a huge impact on participation directed to SOMER Blink; they gained a massive ISK benefit from these prizes.
Impossible to fix? Hardly. CCP has reversed ISK transactions many times in the past; there is no reason that they could not have reset this. Instead, they chose to proceed with the giveaway even after the public uproar, completely ignoring the most significant of player concerns over the matter: favoritism towards SOMER Blink over other player organizations. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Shad Duken
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:32:00 -
[507] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Frankly, the replacement prizes were at least as bad as, if not worse than, the originally proposed prizes - they were something brand new and guaranteed unique; the SOMER lottery would be the only way to ever win one. For anyone who doesn't know what "uptick" I'm talking about, it can be seen here (from SOMER Blink's own site tracking of Blink activity at the time the EVE Vegas giveaways were announced). It's pretty clear that this announcement had a huge impact on participation directed to SOMER Blink; they gained a massive ISK benefit from these prizes.
Although I agree there was a degree of uptick due to the prizes, you'll see a similar uptick for all of their celebrations - including a far bigger uptick during their 1Q when they had titans as prizes.
Kirren D'marr wrote: Impossible to fix? Hardly. CCP has reversed ISK transactions many times in the past; there is no reason that they could not have reset this. Instead, they chose to proceed with the giveaway even after the public uproar, completely ignoring the most significant of player concerns over the matter: favoritism towards SOMER Blink over other player organizations.
And how many of those transactions include people who had a problem with it? How many hundreds of blinks would have to be rolled back, most of which would be for people who play blink for fun/winnings and not for the minimal number who came specifically for those two ships. Yet you talk about fair.... |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:37:00 -
[508] - Quote
Pingu wrote:What is the real life cash payment for selling a GTC?
Seems it is 'around $3'.
So it looks like the 200 million you get from Somer becomes, on average with their rake, 120 million in prizes.
Say $24 per billion they actually have to give away.
Sorry, that is now definitely RMT to me and is a pretty effective way to convert ISK to $.
|

Large Collidable Object
morons.
2334
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:44:00 -
[509] - Quote
Read this if you're interested in Somers busines practice.
The problems are:
1. The site is a scheme not serving eves community at all. No matter what - Somer wins - otherwise they wouldn't be successful. I don't need to run a multivariate anynaylsis on that (I could, provided I had the numbers) - but that's just common sense. 2. CCPs favoritsim doesn't only interfere with other ingame gambling sites competition, but GTC selling sites having partnerships with other 'fansites' such as battleclinic. 3. It's no wonder Somer sponsor lots of ingame and OOG events - it strengthens their gamblerbase. Does Anheuser-Busch receive government gifts for running bud light TV-adds in superbowl commercial breaks to create more alcoholics? Should they receive any?
_______________
So much for the objective part - I'll refrain from posting any subjective comments as that would likely get me banned, given the completely arbitrary and self-serving nature of these forums moderating staff. You know... morons. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 00:59:00 -
[510] - Quote
Dear Samantha,
I have taken my life in order to provide capital for you. It was purely a business decision. I hope you can understand that. |
|

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
105
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 01:29:00 -
[511] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Frankly, the replacement prizes were at least as bad as, if not worse than, the originally proposed prizes - they were something brand new and guaranteed unique; the SOMER lottery would be the only way to ever win one. For anyone who doesn't know what "uptick" I'm talking about, it can be seen here (from SOMER Blink's own site tracking of Blink activity at the time the EVE Vegas giveaways were announced). It's pretty clear that this announcement had a huge impact on participation directed to SOMER Blink; they gained a massive ISK benefit from these prizes. Although I agree there was a degree of uptick due to the prizes, you'll see a similar uptick for all of their celebrations - including a far bigger uptick during their 1Q when they had titans as prizes.
A "degree of uptick" is putting it mildly; that thing skyrocketed. Those previous upticks were the result of SOMER's own doing; this one was solely the result of CCP's actions. If you can't see the difference in that, then I have to assume you are being intentionally obtuse.
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote: Impossible to fix? Hardly. CCP has reversed ISK transactions many times in the past; there is no reason that they could not have reset this. Instead, they chose to proceed with the giveaway even after the public uproar, completely ignoring the most significant of player concerns over the matter: favoritism towards SOMER Blink over other player organizations.
And how many of those transactions include people who had a problem with it? How many hundreds of blinks would have to be rolled back, most of which would be for people who play blink for fun/winnings and not for the minimal number who came specifically for those two ships. Yet you talk about fair.... Ninja edit: The only way to tell to any degree of accuracy would be how many NEW accounts were created to SOMER Blink from the time the prizes were announced to the time they were withdrawn - and how many of them stopped playing blink immediately after the withdrawal was announced.
I didn't say it would be easy to fix, only that it was not impossible. The fact is that if CCP truly intended to repair the situation, they could have. Yes it would have been a massive undertaking, but sometimes that's what it takes to fix a massive screw-up. The fact remains that what kept CCP from fixing this was not the capability, but the will.
"More difficult than we want to deal with" /= "impossible." Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Ice Pirateer
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:09:00 -
[512] - Quote
Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?
Bump ? ^^^
I sell drugs... |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
271
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:26:00 -
[513] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote:StabThigh wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Covering the "it's all RMTing because they make money off each referral" - so does every other site that refers you to a GTC site. CCP has clearly decided that this is acceptable for one reason or another (I'd guess because the site owners are having to pay RL cash for the sites?).
You missed the point. The point is not only that they make cash of each referrel, its that they offer isk for you to give them that cash. It's a fine line, but actually they offer you BLINK CREDIT - which is not an in-game item. blink credit = isk Blink credit = blink credit. The fact that it's portrayed in isk value is irrelevant. It's being used for ease of reference. They could equally use Ladybirds as the named currency, but that would confuse everyone. Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
Blink credits can be used to win lotteries, no? So if you pay for every ticket you effectively by the item (hence why it is a penny auction). If you do this using blink credits that Somer gave you in exchange for cash, then you have effectively bought the item.
But you need not be the only bidder. If the eight people who bid on an item all use blink credits that were given to them for buying a GTC, then SOMER has now effectively sold the item for cash.
This isn't difficult. The line isn't fine except for people who want to ignore it like CCP Guard and the rest of the SOMERblink sponsored community dev team. LOL.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
221
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:29:00 -
[514] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Let's take a look at what the EULA has to say about it:
EVE Online-« End User License Agreement
6. CONDUCT
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game.
Holy shut the front door I didn't read this section of the EULA. Enough said SOMER BLINK IS A EULA VIOLATION. Unless what was written hear is false.
Keep digging my sad box minons. Honestly after reading this WTF were you guys thinking.
CSM white paper ---------------> Toilet this way
EULA --------------> Toilet this way
TOS --------> Legal in game scams sorry we will not tolerate this anymore and have re word it so we can punish you - This way
Ok I have to ask in a very loud eve paying customer voice. WHO THE DUCK IS SOMER BLINK AND HOW DID THE GET YOU TO NOT ONLY DUCK THE COMPANY I LOVE BUT 5HIT ALL OVER THE SAND BOX AND ITS RULES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yes I know I used caps but I cant scream at you over the phone so deal with it |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
221
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:35:00 -
[515] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Frankly, the replacement prizes were at least as bad as, if not worse than, the originally proposed prizes - they were something brand new and guaranteed unique; the SOMER lottery would be the only way to ever win one. For anyone who doesn't know what "uptick" I'm talking about, it can be seen here (from SOMER Blink's own site tracking of Blink activity at the time the EVE Vegas giveaways were announced). It's pretty clear that this announcement had a huge impact on participation directed to SOMER Blink; they gained a massive ISK benefit from these prizes. Although I agree there was a degree of uptick due to the prizes, you'll see a similar uptick for all of their celebrations - including a far bigger uptick during their 1Q when they had titans as prizes. Kirren D'marr wrote: Impossible to fix? Hardly. CCP has reversed ISK transactions many times in the past; there is no reason that they could not have reset this. Instead, they chose to proceed with the giveaway even after the public uproar, completely ignoring the most significant of player concerns over the matter: favoritism towards SOMER Blink over other player organizations.
And how many of those transactions include people who had a problem with it? How many hundreds of blinks would have to be rolled back, most of which would be for people who play blink for fun/winnings and not for the minimal number who came specifically for those two ships. Yet you talk about fair.... Ninja edit: The only way to tell to any degree of accuracy would be how many NEW accounts were created to SOMER Blink from the time the prizes were announced to the time they were withdrawn - and how many of them stopped playing blink immediately after the withdrawal was announced. your right but the thing is somer is not CCP. They are not regulated. They have no oversite. I want somer to be laid open and I want every full api on every account who is part of this scam. So then I can see how far reaching the isk I fightin this game goes. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
271
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 02:35:00 -
[516] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:Mitch's Forum Alt wrote:Shad Duken wrote: Isk can be converted into Blink Credits, but Blink credits cannot be converted (directly) to Isk.
sure they can. it's called buying every single ticket on a blink and cashing out the prize. You are *trying* to win a ship/several ships, but you can't guarantee getting all the tickets - and therefore can't guarantee winning the blink. You may win enough ships to get some of the blink credit converted back to ships, which you can then convert to isk, but unless you're extremely lucky you won't convert it all. The lottery and potential ship win isn't "Have Blink credit, therefore have isk".
You are not thinking of this globally. It doesn't matter if YOU win the ship.
You aren't the RMT'er. You are just being used by the RMT'er to convert isk to cash.
The RMT'er is the guy who converts isk/ships/etc into cash.
If any of the auctions are won with bids using "blink credits" that were given out for cash (GTC sale) then SOMER has effectively turned isk into cash. Due this enough in small amounts, it becomes a large amount.
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
271
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:19:00 -
[517] - Quote
I'd also like to point out that all of these "EVE Vegas" auctions that have ALREADY BEEN WON:
http://cogdev.net/blink/?act=winners
So these have been giving out before EVE Vegas even occurred. They have NOTHING to do with EVE Vegas, other than SOMER and CCP saying they do. Has EVE Vegas endorsed this?
Basically this has nothing to do with EVE Vegas, it's a bunch of stuff that CCP gave to SOMER for them to auction off as part of their RMT scheme.
How does any of this help sponsor or support EVE Vegas?
You guys are shameless no?
LOL. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
49
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 03:31:00 -
[518] - Quote
So what is the way forward? There are several aspects of this mess that some find disturbing. Which one(s) really constitute a problem for the game?
Any time someone talks about a need for transparency, they are referring to some behavior they perceive to be inappropriate. In which case transparency is not very likely to have solved anything. So for me personally, the issue here is not transparency. I acknowledge CCP has the right to keep secrets from me.
As far as alleged EULA violations by Somer Blink, the EULA is CCP's creation. IF CCP is happy with Somer Blink's business model and it is found to violate the current EULA, CCP can either turn a blind eye or change the EULA. The perception of a double standard for what constitutes RMT is a little unsettling, and if I were in the business of selling GTCs or if I had been banned for RMT activity it might be a problem for me. Since those things don't apply, then again for me personally, this is not the real problem.
When it comes to gambling and national and international laws, I think CCP and Somer Blink and their lawyers are capable of handling things without the help of me or other EVE players. Those of us who like to gamble should gamble, and those of us who think it is bad should probably avoid it. As a "casual gambler" I personally have no problem with the existence of gambling in or outside the game, but I understand it can be a problem for some and I don't think it should be required of any player in order to take advantage of any CCP-sponsored promotion.
CCP is in business to make a profit, and we all benefit when they have the money they need to support and develop the game. Sales of time codes is a revenue source, and promoting time code sales is a legitimate part of their business. It is natural for CCP to want to foster relationships with partners who help them sell GTCs. Whatever else can be said of Somer Blink, I think it's pretty clear that they do help sell GTCs.
So what is the problem?
For me the problem is simply the mixing of out-of-game relationships with in-game rewards. Outside the game I basically think CCP should be free to do whatever they want without transparency or player approval. Inside the game, I think the opinions of the players should be respected, and rigid guidelines should be followed by CCP to preserve fairness and equal opportunity. Specifically no player or organization should receive any injection of in-game wealth from CCP. No player should be forced to deal with a third party in order to receive benefits provided by CCP. Since game time is arguably an in-game commodity, all free accounts and plex rewards should be granted in accordance with published guidelines, and records of such benefits should be available to all players. CCP should be free to create rare items, both valuable and symbolic, but the manner of their distribution should be fair. I'd like to see the CSM involved in making the determination of exactly what is fair.
Other than that, sure there are things I agree and disagree with, and some that I shake my head at, but that aren't really my concern. We aren't all going to agree on what's appropriate, but maybe we can come to terms we can live with.
|

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
106
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 04:13:00 -
[519] - Quote
Careby wrote:Any time someone talks about a need for transparency, they are referring to some behavior they perceive to be inappropriate. In which case transparency is not very likely to have solved anything. So for me personally, the issue here is not transparency. I acknowledge CCP has the right to keep secrets from me.
By and large, I agree with what you're saying, but there are a couple of points I felt merited a response. This is the first. Yes, CCP may have the right to keep secrets from the playerbase. However, I would contend that there is a limit as to what information can ethically be kept secret. Information that affects the market and game economy, which can give a group who knows that information an advantage over those who do not, most certainly crosses that line.
Careby wrote:As far as alleged EULA violations by Somer Blink, the EULA is CCP's creation. IF CCP is happy with Somer Blink's business model and it is found to violate the current EULA, CCP can either turn a blind eye or change the EULA. The perception of a double standard for what constitutes RMT is a little unsettling, and if I were in the business of selling GTCs or if I had been banned for RMT activity it might be a problem for me. Since those things don't apply, then again for me personally, this is not the real problem.
The problem with legal issues, especially ones that are unclear, is they usually are only decided as in violation of the law or not once they have gone to court or have otherwise come to the attention of someone in authority. I doubt that a group like SOMER Blink employs lawyers. I'm sure CCP has a legal department; and they're lawyers may have advised them (either correctly or incorrectly) that this sort of thing is perfectly legit. Or, they may have advised them that it is a legal gray area, but would be unlikely to be tested and they should be fine, especially if it doesn't draw the attention of the local (Icelandic) law. Or, they could have warned them that it was a clear violation, but in being buried inside an online game and again through a third party, no one with any power would be likely to notice. Either way, we as players have no way of knowing what side of the law this issue stands on, but it is certain that if there is anything questionable about it, none of the involved parties are going to intentionally draw attention to it.
The only way to truly know where an issue like this stands legally is not to blindly trust the parties involved to have taken care of it, but to shed light on it and get an official ruling by those in authority. Otherwise, it is just "asking the fox to guard the henhouse."
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:36:00 -
[520] - Quote
Ok I just had this explained in detail how it is RMTing on my coms by people who are a lot smarter then me. In very simple terms it boils down to this.
1. Somer is selling in game items for real money.
2. This is done thru GTC sales. CCP sells them to somer at 10.00 dollars he gets 5.00 dollars = 15 dollars( these are not real numbers. I would love to have the real numbers so I can show you exactly how much he is selling the stuff in game for. But for now we will go with this . You get 200 mil blink credits for buying GTC at his site. Notice I said blink credits not isk.
3. 200 mil blink credits is worth 5.OO. (Just so you can see the reference PLEX worth 600 mil cost 15.00). Somer is using his created out of game somer blink credits to auction off in game items and his out of game free credits are worth 5.00 real dollars for 200 mil or what ever his cut is
4. EVE widget comes up for bid. 48 slots at 200 mil a slot. If all slots are taken by GTC free somer blink credits promotion players then somer sold the in game widget (warning eula breach) for 240.00 dollars. If only half of the slots are free GTC blink credits he sold the item for 120.00 dollars and so on. Getting ready for this IT DOSN'T MATTER WHO WINS. YOU GAINING THE ITEM IS NOT RMTING AND SOMER DOSNT CARE. SOMER SELLING THE ITEM IS AND HE IS MAKING REAL MONEY OF IN GAME ITEMS ( EULA PLEASE SOME ONE PLEASE READ IT). The scary part is most of you don't take the item and turn it back into somer credits and keep playing his raffle game. I guess my father was right the house never loses.
5. RMTing is selling in game items. I don't want to quote the EULA again
Iam trying my best to type this out and Argus has typed it over and over again. CCP you have been scammed by a eve CORP. In one regard Iam proud of somer they pulled off the ultimate scam. This is bigger then the sleeper social club scam and makes eve bank look small. You my friends have won eve take your victory lap please while my friends at CCP in the community department try to save there job for helping you break the EULA and make CCP look really bad.
I would love for you to come on coms and hear it explained verbaly or could some one from EVE radio have argus on to explain it. Once you hear how it is done you will go OMG really. |
|

Disdaine
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 05:53:00 -
[521] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote: 1. Somer is selling in game items for real money.
Somer are giving you back some of the profit they make selling GTC in the form of Blink Credits. It could be argued that since they don't have to do this and could just keep the profits its not RMT and they're just giving you free credits.
The reality is that by giving away credits and losing some of their GTC profits to the occasional winner who cashes out, they're making it a lot more attractive to buy the GTC through them and thus creating more profits than they lose.
It's not really that complicated, but it's probably over the head of someone entertained by mashing F5 and clicking Blink!.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:00:00 -
[522] - Quote
Disdaine wrote:DNSBLACK wrote: 1. Somer is selling in game items for real money.
Somer are giving you back some of the profit they make selling GTC in the form of Blink Credits. It could be argued that since they don't have to do this and could just keep the profits its not RMT and they're just giving you free credits. The reality is that by giving away credits and losing some of their GTC profits to the occasional winner who cashes out, they're making it a lot more attractive to buy the GTC through them and thus creating more profits than they lose. It's not really that complicated, but it's probably over the head of someone entertained by mashing F5 and clicking Blink!.
they are not giving me anything and all they are doing is selling in game stuff. There profit is always there they havn't given me anything. They sold a widget made in game Why is so hard for you to see. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:38:00 -
[523] - Quote
Somer found a way to create a fake currency called somer isk and sell it thru GTC sales. In exchange they are selling in game stuff with there fake isk and profiting with real money. They are in it for the business of making real money directly off in game items and that is a violation of the eula . |

Kate stark
591
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 06:49:00 -
[524] - Quote
so, 27 pages and we've still had no word of what action is or isn't going to be taken on CCP's part? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Rammix
TheMurk
86
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:04:00 -
[525] - Quote
Tinman Spectacular wrote: ...a flaming statue named after the pilot...
[offtopic] BTW, drones - those little creatures - also deserve such thing. I've suggested it in a petition, but seems the idea got lost in some labirynths of petitioning system. [/offtopic]
CCP what would happen if you supported some player-run organization whose commercial activities ingame were based only on trust, and a day after receiving your public support they scammed people who started trusting them because of you? If shorter, what if you supported someone and that person on the next day scammed people? What would you do? The question is not related to SOMER (but I don't trust any lotteries anyway), I'm just curious. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Disdaine
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:04:00 -
[526] - Quote
Glad you agree with what I posted. Lost your meds? |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:16:00 -
[527] - Quote
Ice Pirateer wrote:Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible? Bump ? ^^^
Bump I want to hear the CCP official response. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
396
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:17:00 -
[528] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:so, 27 pages and we've still had no word of what action is or isn't going to be taken on CCP's part?
It almost time for them to lock this one and direct people to another one. |

Rammix
TheMurk
86
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:20:00 -
[529] - Quote
I think CCP shouldn't support in-game organizations whose only (or main) purpose is profit, instead of organizations wich take profit just as voluntary donations. I mean if you want to support someone's business then please keep that support out of game. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Kate stark
592
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:39:00 -
[530] - Quote
Mra Rednu wrote:Kate stark wrote:so, 27 pages and we've still had no word of what action is or isn't going to be taken on CCP's part? It almost time for them to lock this one and direct people to another one.
ooh, redirect roulette. i like that.
we could even make a community service out of it, 100m isk per bet, and you can place your bet on which unrelated thread we'll be redirected to.
then, i too, can get an IWS! Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

gargars
Cohesion Inc Beyond-Repair
97
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 07:48:00 -
[531] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
I am sorry but Somer Blink and employees make tons of ISK from their 'service'... which mean they TAKE from Eve players not give. I realize Guard you were probably picked to respond to this fiasco since you are usually well liked, but the more you try to make them seem noble and needing of rewards, the paler your reputation gets.
|

Kate stark
592
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 08:03:00 -
[532] - Quote
gargars wrote:CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members. I am sorry but Somer Blink and employees make tons of ISK from their 'service'... which mean they TAKE from Eve players not give. I realize Guard you were probably picked to respond to this fiasco since you are usually well liked, but the more you try to make them seem noble and needing of rewards, the paler your reputation gets.
not to mention just because blink have decided that they will make money a different way is somehow more worthy of recognition basically belittles every one in eve who runs missions or salvages etc to make isk as CCP say "blink is making isk (just like you!), but we think they're worth more than you so we'll give them scorpions and you can keep being poor".
as i pointed out elsewhere, all of blink's benevolence is a direct method of drumming up more business. if i got a 3x payout for donating isk to new players, you bet your ass i'd be one of the most benevolent players in the game. not to mention, i'd be doing it without any one having any reason to think i'm involved in RMT or need to question my honesty/trustworthiness. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

RAW23
277
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 08:21:00 -
[533] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
I fail to see why building a profitable business that relies on an out of game infrastructure should be treated as something special that deserves additional rewards on top of the profits it already generates for its owners anymore than an unusual or extremely large business using ingame infrstructure deserves such rewards. An eve business is just that - a business - whether it operates in-game or out of game, and giving any eve business additional advantages over its competitors just for being successful (i.e. for being liked and used regularly) distorts the sandbox in a very significant way. The claim that because SOMER's business has an out of game website at its core it should therefore be treated according to a different set of rules than those that apply to all ingame businesses simply isn't going to wash. There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Kate stark
593
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 08:26:00 -
[534] - Quote
RAW23 wrote:CCP Guard wrote:
This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
I fail to see why building a profitable business that relies on an out of game infrastructure should be treated as something special that deserves additional rewards on top of the profits it already generates for its owners anymore than an unusual or extremely large business using ingame infrstructure deserves such rewards. An eve business is just that - a business - whether it operates in-game or out of game, and giving any eve business additional advantages over its competitors just for being successful (i.e. for being liked and used regularly) distorts the sandbox in a very significant way. The claim that because SOMER's business has an out of game website at its core it should therefore be treated according to a different set of rules than those that apply to all ingame businesses simply isn't going to wash.
not to mention, almost every entity in the game has an out of game website for their own forums and their own in-house tools etc.
goons do pro synergy does red frog does push does and many more i'm sure i haven't even come across.
not to mention all the people that make websites for OTHER PEOPLE to use, such as the websites with mineral prices, the market sites, the lp store sites, and they all do it for no reward, out of their own pocket, and for them it's nothing but a pure expense.
saying that blink are somehow special because they got a pretty website is a feeble justification for dumping billions of isk in their wallets.
actually, that point pretty much makes CCP guard wrong, it is an every day task to build an out of game website for players to use.... Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 08:51:00 -
[535] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Mra Rednu wrote:Kate stark wrote:so, 27 pages and we've still had no word of what action is or isn't going to be taken on CCP's part? It almost time for them to lock this one and direct people to another one. ooh, redirect roulette. i like that. we could even make a community service out of it, 100m isk per bet, and you can place your bet on which unrelated thread we'll be redirected to. then, i too, can get an IWS!
I wonder how many out of game sites have bulked up their staff because of 'one member, one scorp'. All these one man operations that now have a fake staff of twenty... |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2681
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 09:02:00 -
[536] - Quote
Ice Pirateer wrote:Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible? Bump ? ^^^ What?
Anyone?
Anyone?
Bueller?
Bueller?
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Kate stark
593
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 09:05:00 -
[537] - Quote
Pingu wrote:Kate stark wrote:Mra Rednu wrote:Kate stark wrote:so, 27 pages and we've still had no word of what action is or isn't going to be taken on CCP's part? It almost time for them to lock this one and direct people to another one. ooh, redirect roulette. i like that. we could even make a community service out of it, 100m isk per bet, and you can place your bet on which unrelated thread we'll be redirected to. then, i too, can get an IWS! I wonder how many out of game sites have bulked up their staff because of 'one member, one scorp'. All these one man operations that now have a fake staff of twenty...
indeed, for this venture we will need no less than thirty full time staff, all conveniently belonging to me. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Destruction for Hire
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:02:00 -
[538] - Quote
Judging by the post numbers, 5 posts have been removed from this thread in the last few hours. I would love to know which ones... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:08:00 -
[539] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Judging by the post numbers, 5 posts have been removed from this thread in the last few hours. I would love to know which ones...
Mine talking about how one man corps would bulk up their membership due to 'one person, one scorp' has gone. Petitioned it.
edit: http://www.eve-search.com/thread/285492-1/page/18#535 |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2493
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:10:00 -
[540] - Quote
Somer are to "community sites" what casinos are to volunteer-ran soup kitchens |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:21:00 -
[541] - Quote
Oh cmon guyz give CCP a break they are on vacation and will come back soonGäó  |

Kate stark
599
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:27:00 -
[542] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Judging by the post numbers, 5 posts have been removed from this thread in the last few hours. I would love to know which ones...
the ones about having lots of alts as "staff" just to get more scorpions, and my post about the "irrelevant link roulette" where ccp close the thread and redirect us to unrelated threads for us to continue to give feedback in.
since we know they're here, think they'll bother letting us have an update? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 10:40:00 -
[543] - Quote
Seriously tho, Guard already sorted out and alligned the previous matter to a point where discussion and suggestions can be made to determine the rewards given to community services and fansites. The prizes still need to be settled and the guidelines that will qualify the entities to receive them still have to be written and publicly disclosed, but that matter is partially out of the way.
However the matter regarding Somer Blinks' use of isk tokens to reward those who buy a GCT through their referral system still needs to be adressed by Guard and/or other CCP representatives. We are aware that if CCP wants to they can turn a blind eye on this matter and interpret and/or change the game's EULA and specifically the rules of conduct about selling items for real money in a way that it won't make Somer Blinks actions illegitimate. However this will further confirm their favoritism and support of Somer Blink's actions within the sandbox and the game, so the question about whether other players will be able to engage in similar conducts still stands and requires their pronunciation on it so that an agreement can be alligned in the same way that was for the community services and fansite rewards issue.
Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible? |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:30:00 -
[544] - Quote
StuckAtTheLock wrote:People are forgetting that blink makes a cut of successful transactions through 3rd party sales through referrals. Since somer has more isk than anybody knows wha to do with- what can they do with it in game? The answer is nothing. What about out of game? Well, if somer could find a way to offload his extra isk as cash, then he'd be sitting pretty.
This is exactly what he is doing. He is losing out on 200m isk for each successful plex sale and pocketing a percentage of the Cash transaction(through mar dragon). Since he is providing a plex for the same cost as ccp- but giving the purchaser +200m isk over current market value- who wouldn't take advantage of this?
Somer is losing 200m isk for every plex purchase through their site, but gaining real money. Convenient way to offload a basically worthless supply of infinite isk?
This is absolutely RMT. You can split hairs however you like but you can't deny that somer's model is to give up 200m isk to gain real cash.
The worst part is not that ccp sanctioned this action publicly- but they encouraged it and labelled it as the most deserving(helpful) community service project. Disgusting.
No the worse part is CCP gave them SOE ships, trips to Iceland, and other goodies so they could RMT more.
CCP sactioned, supported and funded their RMT. And we can't trust CCP to investigate their RMT because they've created a conflict of interest...
And the community devs continue to defend it because "oh gosh Somer gives away so much isk". Thanks for making our point, nice to see the community devs are so easily bought.
Time to fire some folks Hilmar. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:31:00 -
[545] - Quote
Pingu wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:Pingu wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Running a penny lottery is not hard CCP so why don't you run it yourself? Montmazar wrote:In other news, we still don't know why CCP loves Somer so much. We did at least get to find out eventually why they loved BoB. Looking forward to future leaks, because the explanations given so far do not make sense. *sigh* CCP are not legally permitted to set up any form of lottery themselves due to Icelandic law. Gambling attracts real life cash from morons who gamble away all their in game isk and need to spend more real life cash than they should. Greed is good. CCP want to have gambling in their game because it makes them money and since they cannot do it themselves Somer Blink are a godsend to them. Can SOMERblink legally give away prizes that have real cash value in the "real world"? These items are subject to taxes in the United States and there are other laws regarding their distribution that have the potential to be violated as well. What is the mailing address for SOMERblink should I have a grievance? Who can I call? If what you say about icelandic law is true, then is SOMERblink being used as a dummy corporation in order to circumvent Icelandic law? Sounds crazy, but if CCP can't run the auction because of Icelandic law, and instead they use a corporation that only REALLY exists in a game they created to run the same auction... well yeah, that's sketchy no? Not sure if that whole "Icelandic Law" thing is true tho to be fair. Frankly I am surprised any US based member of SOMER would want the attention of this because if they are paid enough game time/isk as 'payment in kind' it also could be subject to taxes (although I admit I am not an accountant, so correct me if I am wrong). Why not have the casino help run the lottery for the items? They can legally raffle off whatever they want, and have actual "out of game" credentials to do so. Or why not the EVE Vegas folks themselves? The point is, CCP screwed up bad by getting into bed with SOMER and the only acceptable course of action is to get out. Going ahead with this lottery through SOMER, is a bad path to go down. Yet all we get from devs is "but... but... but...". No confidence here. Read the Icelandic legal position on this for yourself: http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/I found this to be an interesting read too, http://www.frixo.com/sbook/regions/iceland.asp especially these quotes: -According to Articles 183 and 184 of the Criminal Code, in effect since 1998, GÇ£it is a punishable offense to engage in gambling and betting on a professional basis, to encourage others to participate in these activities and to derive direct or indirect income from having the activities take place on oneGÇÖs premises." -For all gambling activities, proper licenses must be obtained from the Ministry of Justice. Revenues must go toward helping not-for-profit charitable causes, such as philanthropic activities and sports clubs. Raffles without the permission of a police commissioner are absolutely forbidden. (see also the original articles http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=190914 ) Do CCP have a gambling license? Nope. Are they likely to get one? Nope. You sure? Yip. The 'encouraging others' part is also very relevant here and makes me wonder who at CCP authorised a link to Somer.
So the Icelandic authorities should look into this. CCP basically used SOMER as a front to violate Icelandic law.
|

Lucy Alfrir
The Lost Shadows Easily Excited
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:50:00 -
[546] - Quote
I'm all for supporting out of game websites. I use Battleclinic a lot and think the best present CCP could give them is an api server that actually works properly. You know one where ALL the killmails get reported in a nice easy to use fashion.
Giving out shiny scorps to Somer staff is a nice gesture (for the staff) but doesn't really help anyone. A working api server on the other hand would be a boon to all. |

Goggles Deudigren
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:50:00 -
[547] - Quote
The way I see it, CCP is a business. The items you have to promo are game time, stuff, and stuff in game. I am a user not a stock holder as are most if not all EVE players. Give away what you like as long as it doesn't greatly affect some aspect of the game. A few ships don't do that. If they did we would be overrun by tourny prizes and we are not.
Eve players gotta moan.
|

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:54:00 -
[548] - Quote
Shad Duken wrote:---Somer and CCP white knighting---
A quick recap for you.
This is not really about somer or even secrecy. Both these are still important though.
It is about transparency, the wtf value of stuffz given out, the lack of all eve players ability to participate, questions about the fairness of this and CCP's inability to explain who gets what and why, and CCP's out-and-out endorsing of any entity (or player) to name but a few of the issues that arose.
It is about trust. What else have CCP given out that no one knows about? Do you trust CCP to be honest about what they have given out after all this? I know I dont trust what CCP Guard said earlier about secret give aways ; 'what have you given away secretly ccp guard?', "Secretly...nothing. ", yet more weasel words and he could be thinking that it is not secret as *someone* knew; tell us what has been given out, when and why and dont try to "jedi mind trick" us by saying you answered this when you did not as the answer we want is a list containing who/when/why and nothing else will do.
I want to hear from IA about this; how, why and when their mandate to protect the game from this sort of thing changed.
I will say a little about the Somer problems.
Rmt is important as many see what somer do as rmt, somer being given stuffz and endorsed because they sponsor things is a rather spurious argument, somer making a profit is fine but making a profit without actually playing the game is a lot less fine.
The values of the ships, and prizes, is fairly critical for me. I have made around two trillion in assets in about nine years, for CCP to give somer 600 billion in Scorps, easily 2 trillion+ in five unique ships for nothing is like a kick in the balls to me.
(changed to 3 unique ships and 2 all expenses paid trips, still with a potential worth of, what, 1.4 trillion?)
Can you understand this? Nine years gameplay versus a few server clicks to generate some space pixels. If you cannot see why this is wrong then we have no common ground. Dont get me started on how the actual wealth it made somer was possibly 35 trillion (which becomes close to a potential eight hundred thousand US dollars of rmt, oh, and the endorsement and advertising from CCP made them how much in real life cash?).
CCP Guard wrote:We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :)
Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer...
Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret?
Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they?
I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000?
Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions. |

Kate stark
602
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 11:54:00 -
[549] - Quote
Goggles Deudigren wrote:Give away what you like as long as it doesn't greatly affect some aspect of the game. A few ships don't do that.
erm, that's exactly what it does.
spawning anything out of thin air for a select subset of players affects some aspect of the game. that's why it's a dumb idea. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:18:00 -
[550] - Quote
As for the RMT, just because it doesn't seem clear to everyone.
First, you need to step back and think globally - it's not about what you as a customer of blink is doing, you are not 'buying isk for cash' (well you are but only in small amounts/percents. But SOMERblink is most definitely converting in game items and currency to ISK. People seem to be lost in the idea that the person who bids using GTC gained currency may not win the auction, but they don't have to.
First, there is a GTC sale. In a way SOMERblink serves as the broker for this sale (although for all we know the people who run SOMER are also the GTC sellers out of game) and gets a percentage. Let's assume for arguments sake he gets $1 for the transaction.
In return he gives you 200M isk. Ok, it's not real isk, but on the website it is listed as real isk. SOMER treats it like real isk (although I assume they are smart enough to not let you outright refund it). It's SOMER isk. In fact this is better than them giving you 200M isk, because they don't even have to give you real isk. You have no 'account' at SOMER remember, just a record of how many credits you have with them where 1 credit = 1 isk. So they can just create 200M SOMERisk from nowhere and give it to you.
So now you have 200M make believe SOMER isk that cost you, at least to SOMERblink, $1.
Now let's say you bid on an item. And we'll assume you are not the only bidder. Let's use a Rorqual. I will use that because when I've seen them on blink the 'bids' go for 200m isk. So they are basically selling one 'bid' for a dollar at least when it comes to the Rorqual.
It is interesting to note at this point that what SOMERblink is doing is not a lottery, nor is it an auction. What they are actually doing is selling an item, at an increased cost, to the EVE community for 200M isk per share. What you are buying is a share, or a chance to own, a rorqual (or not, as we will see below). There is no game of chance in this transaction. There is no risk assumed by SOMERblink at all. They are selling you and the other 'bidders/shareholders" the item and then helping you randomly determine who gets to keep it. There is certainly some semantics involved with this, but it results in some very distinct differences between lotteries, auctions, and gambling that basically amount to this: SOMERblink assumes no risk, there is no game of chance from their perspective. They sell a group of people an item and then the item is randomly given to one of the group. So all of you who bid on the rorqual are basically buying it for 3.2 billion isk and then randomly giving it to one of you.
But back to our auction. Assume you manage, with your SOMERisk to buy half the bids at 200m each, which you have paid $1 for per 200M. Now let's say the other bids sell to people who have used "real isk" (in reality they are using SOMERisk they bought with real isk, but that's not terribly important). Now the item "sells". At this point it is totally irrelevant who the item goes to. It sold. SOMER no longer owns it, one of the bidders does. They could just as easily share it.
There were 16 bids, so SOMER has now received 8 dollars plus 1.6 billion isk for the rorqual.
SOMER has sold that rorqual for 8 dollars and gotten 1.6 billion isk as well. They have RMT'ed the rorqual.
They can then take the 1.6 bil and use it to buy other items that they can do the same with. If SOMER wants to they could eventually convert ALL of their isk into cash, but because they maintain a nice profit margin they are able to increase their isk holdings all while converting some of it, slowly, into cash.
Another interesting side of this is that there need not be any rorqual. It can be a completely virtual item, because they now have the isk to go out and buy one and give it to you should you want it, but you could also just as well take the buyout in isk. So SOMER need not actually have items to auction, they just need to know they can buy the item. They then buy it, and give it to you (after you and others have already paid for it). So they are basically auctioning off the right to broker an item. Like Neo's spoon, the item doesn't even have to exist.
And what if you take the buyout of 2.9 billion isk? Well then CCP has just sold you 1.3 billion isk for a eight dollars. If all of the bids are bought using SOMERisk gained through GTC purchasing, then they have sold you 1.3 billion isk for 16 dollars. From the buyer perspective it's not a great deal, but for SOMER it's 16 dollars per 1.3 billion isk. I'll leave the multiplicative math to someone else, but I would imagine it results in a non-insignificant amount of cash. And either way, the amount doesn't matter: it's RMT'ing.
But look a little further. Say no SOMERisk is involved and all of the bids are purchased with real isk. The EVE community has just bought 2.9 billion isk for 3.2 billion isk. Good job folks.
So SOMERblink definitely participates in what amounts to RMT'ing. What is astonishing though is not this fact, but the fact that a bunch of community devs who thoroughly investigated them were not able to see this. They do not run a "gambling" site, despite the claims of the same devs. AND, the same devs gave these guys thousands of dollars in real world items and in game items to sell via SOMERblink under the guise of them being a "gambling site" when they are not. Items which eventually will basically be sold off for cash. In other words, our community devs have provided SOMERblink, an in game corporation they have deemed "trustworthy" with free items, worth thousands of dollars, for SOMERblink to sell off for cash.
And their defense remains the amount of isk SOMERblink throws around in game. Clearly SOMER's campaign has worked, their sponsorships have not only led to them having customers, but the approval of CCP devs. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:25:00 -
[551] - Quote
(continued)
As I have stated earlier - the problem with giving stuff to an in game corporation and calling them trustworthy is that even a perceived conflict of interest is a problem. And now that has come to fruition.
The perceived conflict of interest has now become a real one because how can we as players trust CCP to investigate RMT by SOMERblink. Had CCP had no contact with them, and then investigated it and come back with something akin to "yes they are using a loophole but there is nothing we can really do to enforce it", while that would be rather unbelievable and intolerable, at least CCP would not be able to be accused of wrong doing and bias.
But now, no answer we get from CCP in SOMERblinks' favor can be trusted.
CCP Guard and other devs, by extolling the virtues of SOMERblink have rendered themselves and CCP untrustworthy in this regard. And by emphasizing the amount of isk that SOMER hands out as a reason for their feelings - they have basically confirmed themselves as bought.
Good work.
I urge everyone who has an alt to at least unsub it pending a response from someone at CCP we can trust, if any such person exists. I trust Jon Lander, Hilmar, David Reid, etc.. and I am sure there are others who fit the same mold. I have sat and had conversations with these men and they are intelligent, thoughtful and forward thinking individuals. But we need a response from a CCP executive who understand this problem and can think objectively because even if Guard and his fellow community devs are not flat out corrupt , they are most decidedly in over their heads.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
232
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:28:00 -
[552] - Quote
Pingu wrote:Shad Duken wrote:---Somer and CCP white knighting--- A quick recap for you. This is not really about somer or even secrecy. Both these are still important though. It is about transparency, the wtf value of stuffz given out, the lack of all eve players ability to participate, questions about the fairness of this and CCP's inability to explain who gets what and why, and CCP's out-and-out endorsing of any entity (or player) to name but a few of the issues that arose. It is about trust. What else have CCP given out that no one knows about? Do you trust CCP to be honest about what they have given out after all this? I know I dont trust what CCP Guard said earlier about secret give aways ; 'what have you given away secretly ccp guard?', "Secretly...nothing. ", yet more weasel words and he could be thinking that it is not secret as *someone* knew; tell us what has been given out, when and why and dont try to "jedi mind trick" us by saying you answered this when you did not as the answer we want is a list containing who/when/why and nothing else will do. I want to hear from IA about this; how, why and when their mandate to protect the game from this sort of thing changed. I will say a little about the Somer problems. Rmt is important as many see what somer do as rmt, somer being given stuffz and endorsed because they sponsor things is a rather spurious argument, somer making a profit is fine but making a profit without actually playing the game is a lot less fine. The values of the ships, and prizes, is fairly critical for me. I have made around two trillion in assets in about nine years, for CCP to give somer 600 billion in Scorps, easily 2 trillion+ in five unique ships for nothing is like a kick in the balls to me. (changed to 3 unique ships and 2 all expenses paid trips, still with a potential worth of, what, 1.4 trillion?) Can you understand this? Nine years gameplay versus a few server clicks to generate some space pixels. If you cannot see why this is wrong then we have no common ground. Dont get me started on how the actual wealth it made somer was possibly 35 trillion (which becomes close to a potential eight hundred thousand US dollars of rmt, oh, and the endorsement and advertising from CCP made them how much in real life cash?). CCP Guard wrote:We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :) Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer... Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret? Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000? Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions.
---------------------------------- Well said. Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? THIS IS THE SMOKING GUN!!!!!!!!! I also have trillions of isk made over 8 years of playing this game. Can I create a currency (Black Credits) out of game and sell GTC and give it away 200 mil at a clip and I promise I wont even use in game stuff . I will sell ( raffle is what they call it) prostitution. So you heard it here DNSBlack will give you free black credits to buy tickets on a women or man of your choice. Just buy GTC from my web site and play for free or send me 200 mil for the ticket in game and I will convert it to black credits so you can play. The selling (raffle)will begin when 500 GTC are sold: But you dont know that. Don't worry prostitution is legal in my country and state and I am not breaking any Icelandic laws. Do you see how absurd that is and now you add in the mix kids are playing your game. CCP should not be in bed with this organization and they should not allow there eve to be pimped out. This is just a bad business model. I hope someone who is addicted to gambling drives himself into debt so bad buying your isk CCP that he threatens to commit suicide cause he lost all his isk on somer blink. Cause from what I heard you take people threatening to do that very seriously or has that changed. CCP you are on the wrong side of this fight period. Pull everything and distance your self from this as fast as you can. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:37:00 -
[553] - Quote
You know oddly enough, through the creation of SOMERisk, SOMERblink has basically created their own form of AURUM that is only usable for bidding on SOMERblink item sales.
I wonder how many of SOMERblink's customers were outraged over aurum.
The fact that CCP would tolerate a player created, cash-for-isk, parallel economy that is not controllable by them is shocking. SOMERblink can basically 'print' SOMERisk to their hearts content. They are then selling this SOMERisk for both real isk and real cash, and functioning as an exchange bank.
Except CCP apparently thinks they are nifty.
The impact of this on the economy is actually above me. Can we here from CCP Economist, Dr. Gudmundsson on this?
Does he think they are nifty too? |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:41:00 -
[554] - Quote
CCP Guard, thank you for paying attention and following this issue. If you have been reading this thread so far, you must have quite an opinion and a good, overall understanding of the concerns of gamers.
What you give them aside, gambling websites "themselves" are a major problem with incredible isk advantage, RMT suspicions, almost zero in-game effort, etc. They owe their existence to a few legal allowances, exploit them like hell, and vacuum the community like a black hole. They do not even have to play the game in order to do this!!
They must be shut down ASAP and all ties to the actual gameworld must be cut off. It is not an issue of whether we like them or not. We sometimes play, sometimes win and sometimes lose. This is irrelevant. What is relevant is that they "always" win. "Always" win is NOT EVE!!!!
Shut them down! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
200
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:48:00 -
[555] - Quote
At the current state of things Somer Blink could even start gifting out isk tokens for chocolate or candy bar sales from any other 3rd party site. Buy x product from 3rd party site, get isk token. The only problem with that situation would be that CCP would not turn a blind eye on it because the "product" wouldn't be GTC's anymore and they wouldn't be profiting from its sales. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 12:51:00 -
[556] - Quote
On a different note, does anyone know if EVE Vegas themselves sanctioned the use of their name in regards to the SOMER auctions for the SOE ships, etc.?
Clearly those prizes, which amount to possibly thousands of dollars in real cash value due to the trips to Iceland, which were given to SOMERblink by CCP devs and could ultimately be converted into cash through SOMER's RMT scheme, actually have NOTHING to do with EVE Vegas (especially since the event is still a week away and the auctions/lotteries already occurred) other than the fact that SOMER and CCP said they do.
So I am curious if they at least at EVE Vegas's blessing to conduct this, despite there being no apparent relationship between the auctions and the event other than in name? |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:00:00 -
[557] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:[Did CCP basically used SOMER as a front to violate Icelandic law? Is there something worth reporting to Icelandic legal authorities here or is it all smoke?
But CCP Guard will probably argue that SOMERblink is a charity, lol.
It looks like a legal gray area, which we as players posting on a forum are not likely to unravel. There are a lot of factors at work here which could make for loopholes in the previously quoted Icelandic law (lotteries taking place in a virtual world, servers located in England, etc.). The bottom line is that it's probably going to take some lawyers on both sides of the issue hashing it out and an official ruling from the Icelandic legal system in order for anything to be decided. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1580
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 13:23:00 -
[558] - Quote
Just went through the entire thread reading CCP Guard's replies. None of the feedback on the situation that CCP Guard has given justifies SOMER's treatment by CCP.
CCP Navigator's endorsement of SOMER's trustworthiness alone goes beyond a mere business relationship. What I get out of the wording and the tone of it is the relationship between CCP and SOMER is closer than a typical business agreement. CCP did put its reputation on the line when Navigator, in terms of absolutes, vouched for SOMER.
Quote:SOMER Blink have a history of being trustworthy and honoring every blink played without exception.
Quote:...to date they have been 100% trustful
Seriously, CCP accounted for every isk they ever paid out, all whatever quadrillion? Riiiight. Only one way that could happen, is if it's a CCP commissioned site ran by CCP employees under the guise of a completely different company name. Or CCP has a vetting process that includes detailed auditing of every blink and every toon that ever blinked. Out of the two, I know which one I believe is more likely.
Now, CCP Guard, you might be telling yourself that this is complete rumor mongering. And sure, it may be. But there's a point to be made here which is if CCP is intent on being this cozy with a RL business operating in game and CCP doesn't want us, the players aka your customers, concluding that the sandbox is broken because of inappropriate relationships and disproportionate favoring then there needs to be more transparency and rules of conduct in game for said businesses.
Don't ban me, bro! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:07:00 -
[559] - Quote
This has been rolling around in my head.
1. If Somer is sponsering eve vegas: How is somer doing this. Events take real money not isk right? I fthey aren't then why are they involved shouldn't the eve vagas be getting the free promotional stuff.
2. Why weren't the trips and gear given away at the event. Isn't that standard business practice. Promoters use give away like this. " Hey eve players come to eve vegas and you will be entered into a drawing to win a trip to 2014 fanfest. This prize was dontated by CCP" " We also have a lot of other swag to give away so don't miss out on the most exciting player run event ever"
3. Why is this drawing over.
4. I am having disconnect in this player run eve vegas event--- CCP---- real money to help sponser the event ---- How giving somer all the swag to blink off is accomplishing this.???????????????????
5 I thought somer was needing isk to sponsor the pvp tourney at the event is that the only reason and why would they need money or isk when all of that can be run on the test server for free?????? |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3839
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 15:54:00 -
[560] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: You've asked for more clarifications a few times before in this thread and I-¦m not sure how I can clarify this to your satisfaction. I think it's fairly well covered in my reply why we thought it would make sense to explore a relationship with them during a time when we are thinking a lot about more tournaments and competitive events. If you just plain don't like lottery sites or SOMER in particular then of course you're just going to disagree with that judgement call and that's perfectly natural.
What was that you were saying before about not trying to Jedi mind-trick us?
Simply answering my direct questions INDIVIDUALLY with SPECIFIC answers instead of vague generalizations would satisfy me. Otherwise your responses thus far seem to be intentionally vague and evasive word crafting, and as such I am requesting that you be more specific regarding certain aspects of your response.
Also lets be very clear, I'm asking these questions so I and others can make informed decisions. I have not stated any position regarding lottery sites, or SOMER, but, putting your assumptions aside, if you provide answers to my very simple questions without trying to spin or be evasive you may assist me and others in forming an opinion one way or another. It would also help restore some of the the respect and trust I and others are presently losing for you specifically, and CCP in general.
I suppose I could play this game with you and make assumptions about your position, and say you just plain don't like the questions because the answers are embarrassing and that's perfectly natural, so it's to be expected that you are just going to continue to evade them, stating they've already been answered.
PLEASE prove me wrong, by just answering the following questions individually, without being evasive.
CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. The above statement that is intended to provide answers contains several vague generalizations and does not address the questions asked. As such, please clarify your post quoted above:
- SB has an "overall track record" of doing what exactly? This is not disclosed in your response.
- When you refer to capability, what "capability" exactly are you referring to? There is no way to determine this from your response.
- What "niche" exactly are you referring to? There is no way to determine this from your response.
- Regardless of whether they registered as one, does CCP consider SB to be a "fansite"? Yes or No?
- Is CCP's official stance that SB is a trusted entity, and that players using its services can have a reasonable expectation they won't be scammed? Yes, or No are the possible answers here as well.
These are not difficult questions. If you simply do not understand the language being used, I'd be happy to clarify. If you simply don't want to answer them, or need to stall for more time so your legal & marketing departments can advise you, just say so, and I'll communicate that to my peers.
CCP Guard wrote: To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
Understood, however the above does not answer the question directly as it was a very simple yes or no question. As such I am asking again above including further clarification on my part.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |
|

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
984
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:09:00 -
[561] - Quote
Out of game rewards only. The Tears Must Flow |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
61
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:10:00 -
[562] - Quote
At some point, repeatedly long-posting the same argument again and again becomes tedious. We've all made our points. No need to keep grinding away. It's not like the 14th wall of text is the one that will finally bring them to the light. |

Uppsy Daisy
Perkone Caldari State
543
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 16:21:00 -
[563] - Quote
Aryth wrote:Ideally sponsorship will come in the form of items that are not insanely valuable (magnates etc) and do not impact the sandbox in any meaningful way. ISK is highly meaningful.
Sponsorship should also be limited to non-profits like Chribba's EVE Files, or The angel project, or possibly EVE UNI. Things that enrich the community and are not simply large scale businesses that send a lot of time card revenue CCP's way. Out of game items are much preferable to ingame ones. T-Shirts, or Rifter Hubs, or other various marketing swag. It would be preferable if game-time was given in such a way it cannot be easily monetized, perhaps game-time directly applied to an account.
These guidelines may not always be preferable and some exceptions may occur but those should be screened through the CSM. Everything should strive to keep the sandbox as pure as possible. Vanity items would be perfect for this. I can see CCP giving out 1000 free ship skins sometime down the road when you introduce that feature. Things that are nice to receive as a player but have no impact on the sandbox.
All the way back from page one.
This dude has nailed it perfectly.
|

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3841
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:11:00 -
[564] - Quote
Doh! The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Rammix
TheMurk
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:12:00 -
[565] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Few billion isk doesn't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Shai 'Hulud
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:26:00 -
[566] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Several billion isk don't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all. While I agree with your point, I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1435
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:29:00 -
[567] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Out of game rewards only.
So easy, so obviously the solution to the freebie part of the issues.
As for the possible RMT part, I have never bought a PLEX nor would I, so I have virtually no knowledge of any possible issues around it.
I would rather earn my shiny new ship etc doing stuff in the game rather than buy in-game stuff using real money.
However, each to their own and all that class of thing. This is not a signature. |

Shai 'Hulud
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:39:00 -
[568] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Vaju Enki wrote:Out of game rewards only. So easy, so obviously the solution to the freebie part of the issues. As for the possible RMT part, I have never bought a PLEX nor would I, so I have virtually no knowledge of any possible issues around it. I would rather earn my shiny new ship etc doing stuff in the game rather than buy in-game stuff using real money. However, each to their own and all that class of thing. I agree with you. I have never purchased a PLEX with cash to trade for isk. But, if you are paying for your game time with cash, there is a decent chance the best deal offered for your payment is to buy the game time through SOMER's site. Unless you do one of the longer payment intervals through CCP's site, you would be better off buying it through SOMER.
Anyone who is paying for game time with cash, one month at a time, is getting ripped off unless they are buying it through SOMER. So it's not just about people that buy plex for the isk rather than the game time. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
612
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:42:00 -
[569] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Several billion isk don't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all.
everything in-game has an isk value though, so inherently any in-game rewards are isk rewards. the value of the isk is irrelevant, it's just magicking isk out of thin air and dumping it in to player wallets without any guidelines is wide open to misuse and abuse.
i think CCP is perfectly fine saying "hey, they are doing something interesting why don't you take a look?", that level of recognition is fine. however flat out saying "blink are 100% legit" or whatever is just... no. it just shouldn't be happening. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1941
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 17:55:00 -
[570] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Several billion isk don't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all. everything in-game has an isk value though, so inherently any in-game rewards are isk rewards. the value of the isk is irrelevant, it's just magicking isk out of thin air and dumping it in to player wallets without any guidelines is wide open to misuse and abuse. i think CCP is perfectly fine saying "hey, they are doing something interesting why don't you take a look?", that level of recognition is fine. however flat out saying "blink are 100% legit" or whatever is just... no. it just shouldn't be happening.
Any transferable in game reward.
I mention a few options here for rewards with no isk value. https://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/2013/10/11/game-rewards/
(I also mention a few limited ones which could be considered to have an ISK value. They're there mostly as a discussion point) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |
|

Rammix
TheMurk
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:38:00 -
[571] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:2 years ago I made a post asking for CCP to quit the hypocrisy, throw the mask and make RMT "canon". To legalize RMT in any form except which is being done by the developer - AWFUL idea. Any form of legal RMT will provoke much more botting, macrosing etc activity. People should keep their RL business out of game worlds. If there are some games that allow RMT for players - those games are sh*t, I'm absolutely sure. When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world.
Kate stark wrote:however flat out saying "blink are 100% legit" or whatever is just... no. it just shouldn't be happening. They made a "community spotlight" for SOMER which looked much like a commercial advertisement. It's not a "flat out saying" but by its significance - dangerously close to it.
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Shai 'Hulud
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:44:00 -
[572] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. You are forgetting the 1 of 5 ships x5 given to them to lottery off. I'm a unique ship collector myself. Based on my own, and more knowledgeable players' estimations, these ships could be worth as much as 1 trillion each (they came with a CCP guarantee that none of them would ever be released again, something that few "unique" ships actually have, and of 5 is one of the most rare of unique ships). All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
234
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:45:00 -
[573] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Several billion isk don't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all. While I agree with your point, I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK).
Honestly think about what your are saying and how the alliance tourney is run before you equal PL and somer in the same argument. |

Shai 'Hulud
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:48:00 -
[574] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:they shouldn't be rewarded with isk for, making isk... recognition and reward are two separate things. Money is vain. Several billion isk don't mean anything significant in the big Eve, several those mentioned ships are not so big profit. The main point is public support from ccp - towards an ingame business-oriented organization. Such attention to an out-of-game entity wouldn't have caused any disputes at all. While I agree with your point, I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Honestly think about what your are saying and how the alliance tourney is run before you equal PL and somer in the same argument. I think you misread my response.
I agreed with his sentiment that this is wrong regardless of the total value gifted, but corrected his total value gifted numbers. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Rammix
TheMurk
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:49:00 -
[575] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. You are forgetting the 1 of 5 ships x5 given to them to lottery off. I'm a unique ship collector myself. Based on my own, and more knowledgeable players' estimations, these ships could be worth as much as 1 trillion each (they came with a CCP guarantee that none of them would ever be released again, something that few "unique" ships actually have, and of 5 is one of the most rare of unique ships). CCP guys have already clearly stated that those ships will appear again in the future. And they don't cost "1 trillion each". OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Shai 'Hulud
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:51:00 -
[576] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. You are forgetting the 1 of 5 ships x5 given to them to lottery off. I'm a unique ship collector myself. Based on my own, and more knowledgeable players' estimations, these ships could be worth as much as 1 trillion each (they came with a CCP guarantee that none of them would ever be released again, something that few "unique" ships actually have, and of 5 is one of the most rare of unique ships). CCP guys have already clearly stated that those ships will appear again in the future. And they don't cost "1 trillion each". "These new cruisers will be unique assets that will be owned only by these players. We will not give these out again." https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unread
You have some reading to do. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
234
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 18:53:00 -
[577] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. You are forgetting the 1 of 5 ships x5 given to them to lottery off. I'm a unique ship collector myself. Based on my own, and more knowledgeable players' estimations, these ships could be worth as much as 1 trillion each (they came with a CCP guarantee that none of them would ever be released again, something that few "unique" ships actually have, and of 5 is one of the most rare of unique ships). CCP guys have already clearly stated that those ships will appear again in the future. And they don't cost "1 trillion each". "These new cruisers will be unique assets that will be owned only by these players. We will not give these out again." https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=281298&find=unreadYou have some reading to do.
My bad I miss understood. |

Anton Menges Saddat
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 19:05:00 -
[578] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:I would like to point out that the total value of gifts given to SOMER is worth roughly the same amount that was awarded to PL for winning the last alliance tournament (~5 trilion ISK). Those ships cost between 10bil and 30bil each (according to eve-central). Approximately 30 ships were given (according to themittani.com), it's 300-900 bil, depending on the selling prices. Well.. that's way too much, I agree with that. Twenty times less would be okay - WITHOUT public support. You are forgetting the 1 of 5 ships x5 given to them to lottery off. I'm a unique ship collector myself. Based on my own, and more knowledgeable players' estimations, these ships could be worth as much as 1 trillion each (they came with a CCP guarantee that none of them would ever be released again, something that few "unique" ships actually have, and of 5 is one of the most rare of unique ships). NEQ
they took a bad idea and after receiving massive backlash, decided to go with it anyways, and give out an equally if not more valuable award |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
112
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 19:34:00 -
[579] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote:however flat out saying "blink are 100% legit" or whatever is just... no. it just shouldn't be happening. They made a "community spotlight" for SOMER which looked much like a commercial advertisement. It's not a "flat out saying" but by its significance - dangerously close to it.
I don't think that reference was to the community spotlight, but rather CCP Navigator's statements in response to the EVE Vegas/SOMER Blink lottery fiasco:
CCP Navigator wrote:SOMER Blink have a history of being trustworthy and honoring every blink played without exception.
CCP Navigator wrote:Q3, How do we know we can trust Fansites and third parties to operate fairly and independently?
A3, We have worked with a lot of third party sites in the past such as EVE Radio, BIG Lottery and SOMER Blink. These entities (and others of course) have demonstrated a solid history of trust and reliability. As a result, we can verify that they have been straight and true in their dealings and this should be encouraged.
...
We would also like to address the role of SOMER Blink in this change. They have had three years of constantly delivering on every blink, blast and bonk they have organized.
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Shai 'Hulud
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 20:12:00 -
[580] - Quote
There is a point of speculation that I do not recall seeing here thus far...
Many have asked "why was SOMER chosen for this reward." CCP's response thus far has been:
CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. I don't think I'm the only person who suspects there was something more pernicious behind this decision. More specifically, I think CCP has seen a sharp rise in GTC sales through SOMER's affiliate link. With the combination of high traffic, gambling (you're more likely to decide "I need more isk" while on SOMER's site than say themittani.com) and bonus site credit offered, there is little doubt who is the current leader in affiliate GTC sales. I suspect they would top this list even when compared to all other affiliate sales combined.
Given this, do we really need to ask "why SOMER?" All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |
|

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
380
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 20:28:00 -
[581] - Quote
IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT EVENTS:
Let the players choose which blog, fansite, site or in game persona is the best regarding impact on the community, and so the Ishukone scorpions would go to the people that make those things.
Thank you. Protect yourself from CONCORD today! Tinfoil hats, quality product. Styled after pirate hats. |

Kate stark
615
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 20:38:00 -
[582] - Quote
Bagrat Skalski wrote:IN THE LIGHT OF RECENT EVENTS:
Let the players choose which blog, fansite, site or in game persona is the best regarding impact on the community, and so the Ishukone scorpions would go to the people that make those things.
Thank you.
*looks at the true stories competition*
yup, that can't go wrong. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
380
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 20:40:00 -
[583] - Quote
At least CCP will have clear account regarding playerbase faith in the company. Protect yourself from CONCORD today! Tinfoil hats, quality product. Styled after pirate hats. |

Rammix
TheMurk
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 20:53:00 -
[584] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:You have some reading to do. No, you have.
This
CCP Guard wrote: Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :)
and more importantly this
CCP Guard wrote:In this dev blog prior to Fanfest 2012, we announced that the ISW was not exclusive and would evntually be made available to everyone eventually: "This leads on to another question, does this mean we will be seeing ship skins for sale in the NeX store or by some other method? That is currently not the plan and is not in development so the short answer is no. The Ishukone Scorpion was already created as the first prototype and Game Design plan to release it to everyone at some stage." OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Montmazar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
63
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 21:20:00 -
[585] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:There is a point of speculation that I do not recall seeing here thus far... Many have asked "why was SOMER chosen for this gift." CCP's response thus far has been: CCP Guard wrote:It had to do with timing, our impression of their overall track record and capability, their niche, and habit of sponsoring events...to name a few. I don't think I'm the only person who suspects there was something more pernicious behind this decision. More specifically, I think CCP has seen a sharp rise in GTC sales through SOMER's affiliate link. With the combination of high traffic, gambling (you're more likely to decide "I need more isk" while on SOMER's site than say themittani.com) and bonus site credit offered, there is little doubt who is the current leader in affiliate GTC sales. I suspect they would top this list even when compared to all other affiliate sales combined. Given this, do we really need to ask "why SOMER?"
We should keep asking until CCP drops the pretense that Somer is a better Eve service than Dotlan, EFT, EveMon, Pyfa and Chriba's services. The longer they pretend that gee whiz, those Somer guys sure are inspiring, then the longer we the customers know we are getting lied to. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 21:26:00 -
[586] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:You have some reading to do. No, you have. This CCP Guard wrote: Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :)
and more importantly this CCP Guard wrote:In this dev blog prior to Fanfest 2012, we announced that the ISW was not exclusive and would evntually be made available to everyone eventually: "This leads on to another question, does this mean we will be seeing ship skins for sale in the NeX store or by some other method? That is currently not the plan and is not in development so the short answer is no. The Ishukone Scorpion was already created as the first prototype and Game Design plan to release it to everyone at some stage." edit: p.s. quotations from this topic
The five unique ships given to SOMER to use as prizes for the EVE Vegas lottery were not IWSs; it was specifically stated that those five ships were created for that event (after the Gold Magnate issue came up), and they would never be given out again (as Shai 'Hulud quoted). If you had bothered to read the quote or the link, you would know that, and that these were the ships Shai 'Hulud was referring to in his post, and you would not look quite so foolish right now. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Niraia
Nocturnal Romance Cynosural Field Theory.
168
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 22:22:00 -
[587] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example.
When I asked Somer how the Vegas sponsorship happened, he told me that CCP Navigator and CCP Bro contacted him on Skype to see if he'd be interested, that it wasn't on his radar at all.
Meanwhile, we (EVE Online Hold'em) had been ignored by the Vegas organiser for months after he agreed to us helping out, presumably because of this sponsorship deal.
The community team selected Somer to sponsor Vegas, so it doesn't seem like an example at all. Niraia EVE Online Hold'Em |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
303
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 22:32:00 -
[588] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:
The five unique ships given to SOMER to use as prizes for the EVE Vegas lottery were not IWSs; it was specifically stated that those five ships were created for that event (after the Gold Magnate issue came up), and they would never be given out again (as Shai 'Hulud quoted). If you had bothered to read the quote or the link, you would know that, and that these were the ships Shai 'Hulud was referring to in his post, and you would not look quite so foolish right now.
For an "event" that will occur a full two weeks after the ships were auctioned off. There was and is absolutely no real link between that auction and EVE Vegas. I have attempted to find out if the reference to EVE Vegas was even endorsed by the EVE Vegas folks but I have not obtained a response. Did they get cash from SOMERblink? If so, it is RMT cash. Did they get isk? How does isk help run an event in Vegas?
CCP basically contributed ships to SOMERblink to auction off and thus aide in their RMT scheme. Literally they just handed SOMERblink isk and cash. The use of the EVE Vegas name was a complete sham, and this has nothing to do with EVE Vegas at all aside from the use of the name. Otherwise why not run this auction concurrently with EVE Vegas?
The discussion as to whether rewards for recognition of should be in game or out of game items is important, and an issue for discussion - but there is a much bigger issue here than a few people being given expensive ships.
This is an obvious RMT equivalent being endorsed as "trustworthy" by CCP staff and prizes that amount to large amounts of isk and real cash in ships, and trips to Iceland being given to the same organization to just raffle off for isk and cash as usual. |

Anton Menges Saddat
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
36
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 22:36:00 -
[589] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:
For an "event" that will occur a full two weeks after the ships were auctioned off. There was and is absolutely no link between that auction and EVE Vegas. I have attempted to find out if the reference to EVE Vegas was even endorsed by the EVE Vegas folks but I have not obtained a response.
this is very disturbing to me  |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
304
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 22:46:00 -
[590] - Quote
Anton Menges Saddat wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:
For an "event" that will occur a full two weeks after the ships were auctioned off. There was and is absolutely no link between that auction and EVE Vegas. I have attempted to find out if the reference to EVE Vegas was even endorsed by the EVE Vegas folks but I have not obtained a response.
this is very disturbing to me 
Please note I edited it to say "no REAL link". Certainly the parties involved (CCP, SOMER, EVE Vegas) could have decided to use the name together, but in the end it's just a name and a certainly not a very strong connection - nor one that would seem to warrant the level of contribution from CCP to SOMER.
Why didn't CCP just give EVE Vegas some cash? Or let them raffle the prizes? |
|

Montmazar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
65
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:00:00 -
[591] - Quote
Niraia wrote:CCP Guard wrote:We selected to reward SOMER and his staff because the time was right to do stuff with them, Vegas sponsorship being an example. When I asked Somer how the Vegas sponsorship happened, he told me that CCP Navigator and CCP Bro contacted him on Skype to see if he'd be interested, that it wasn't on his radar at all. Meanwhile, we (EVE Online Hold'em) had been ignored by the Vegas organiser for months after he agreed to us helping out, presumably because of this sponsorship deal. The community team selected Somer to sponsor Vegas, so it doesn't seem like an example at all.
This is big news, and more evidence of a true business relationship between Somer and CCP, rather than Somer being just another "fansite" that CCP appreciates. |

Anton Menges Saddat
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
37
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:00:00 -
[592] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:
Why didn't CCP just give EVE Vegas some cash? Or let them raffle the prizes?
i hate to say it, but it looks like the reason was because this was really intended to be an isk injection for somer employees. they surely knew the value of the items at the time of gifting, and not only that, but it should be glaringly obvious that the ships are only useful for 3 things: a.) ship spinning in hangar, b.) becoming an ALOD story on TMC, or c.) selling to collectors for massive amounts of isk... guess which option is going to appeal to people working for a casino seeing somer's requests for employees to do the transactions under a veil of secrecy (before the ships had even appeared in their redeem ques), it is clear that the intent was always for them to quietly sell the ships under the radar for the maximum amount of isk and that it should be done in secrecy because they already knew the kind of response in store if they were caught. i am having a hard time seeing any valid reason for CCP to give them these ships in this manner aside from the monetary. if it wasn't about the isk, and the ships are worth 30trit (lol), then why did CCP not just give them something that wasn't worth 20bil on the market at the time? |

Alt Two
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
35
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:09:00 -
[593] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. So the fact that they are already rich is a good excuse for CCP to make them even richer? Oh well, at least you are true to your word https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12654979/eve/guard_tripling_isk.png |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:10:00 -
[594] - Quote
I have faithfully and completely read all posts relating to this topic.
The EVE player base clearly cares about this latest CCP game meddling a lot. This is a train wreck. There is right now hundreds of comments all saying the same thing.
PLAYERS ARE ANGRY:
1) CCP has given SOMERblink a wealth injection (spawned from nothing) of hundreds of billions in unique ships.
2) CCP has an ongoing and sustained campaign to vouch for, and advertise SOMERblink's in game gambling services (which are totally unaudited and unregulated by the way), increasing its revenue again by what can only be expected to be large figures. This is a pure competitive advantage for SOMERblink over its in game competitors.
3) Has been given status as being 'above the EULA' by CCP with its ongoing RMT business.
4) Has been given a special relationship with CCP (CCP skypes with SOMER)
5) CCP just wont give up the 'SOMERblink is a community hub, does good for the eve community and is altruistic' campaign. Most players hate SOMERblink.
THE TRUE TRAGEDY
CCP doesnt even care. Hundreds upon hundreds of players have now passionately expressed their anger at this, and some are even spending time investigated all the facts that relate to this case and presenting them to the community (a real community service I might add).
There is virtually no CCP commentary on this, the only comments I have read continue to sing SOMER's praises, refuse to admit anything, and fail to show any seriousness or investigation.
Put bluntly, while the players believe the above five points, CCP clearly seems to oppose across the board. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4395
|
Posted - 2013.10.12 23:13:00 -
[595] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:2 years ago I made a post asking for CCP to quit the hypocrisy, throw the mask and make RMT "canon". To legalize RMT in any form except which is being done by the developer - AWFUL idea. Any form of legal RMT will provoke much more botting, macrosing etc activity. People should keep their RL business out of game worlds. If there are some games that allow RMT for players - those games are sh*t, I'm absolutely sure. When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world.
It's lovely to see how there are always some people with those pocket, black and white truths.
Let's see how easy is to prove you wrong:
1) EvE on paper is the "no RMT" game with some of the shadiest past about tolerance towards botters and has been plagued by botting and macroing since ever.
2) Games made to deal with RMT as a feature, HAVE to strongly deal and circumscribe botters, macroes and generally cheaters otherwise they screw up the very economic model they work upon.
Rammix wrote: When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world
if you remove the blah blah and the high horse, you find out that EvE tried to introduce "golden ammo". Not a Korean grinder but your truly, noble EvE. GREED IS GOOD, wasn't it?
As I said, hypocrital players got their hypocrical game. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
69
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 00:28:00 -
[596] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:I have faithfully and completely read all posts relating to this topic.
The EVE player base clearly cares about this latest CCP game meddling a lot. This is a train wreck. There is right now hundreds of comments all saying the same thing.
PLAYERS ARE ANGRY:
1) CCP has given SOMERblink a wealth injection (spawned from nothing) of hundreds of billions in unique ships.
2) CCP has an ongoing and sustained campaign to vouch for, and advertise SOMERblink's in game gambling services (which are totally unaudited and unregulated by the way), increasing its revenue again by what can only be expected to be large figures. This is a pure competitive advantage for SOMERblink over its in game competitors.
3) Has been given status as being 'above the EULA' by CCP with its ongoing RMT business.
4) Has been given a special relationship with CCP (CCP skypes with SOMER)
5) CCP just wont give up the 'SOMERblink is a community hub, does good for the eve community and is altruistic' campaign. Most players hate SOMERblink.
THE TRUE TRAGEDY
CCP doesnt even care. Hundreds upon hundreds of players have now passionately expressed their anger at this, and some are even spending time investigated all the facts that relate to this case and presenting them to the community (a real community service I might add).
There is virtually no CCP commentary on this, the only comments I have read continue to sing SOMER's praises, refuse to admit anything, and fail to show any seriousness or investigation.
Put bluntly, while the players believe the above five points, CCP clearly seems to oppose across the board.
CCP, why do you continue to be "white knighting" Somer? Is Somer involved in RMT? |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2487
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 07:12:00 -
[597] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:5) CCP just wont give up the 'SOMERblink is a community hub, does good for the eve community and is altruistic' campaign. Most players hate SOMERblink. To be honest, I doubt most players particularly care about SOMER one way or another, and stating "Most players hate SOMERblink" undermines what is otherwise a good post. This isn't about SOMER directly, this is about CCP arbitrarily picking the winners and losers in what is supposed to be a player-driven sandbox. CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
95
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 07:25:00 -
[598] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote: To be honest, I doubt most players particularly care about SOMER one way or another
I think (at least I hope) that the vast majority of Eve players are able to look at a lottery that sells twelve 100m tickets for a 1b ship and just say "lol no"
I don't hate Somer blink any more than I hate the average jita isk doubler, but that doesn't mean I give them money , or that I'm ok with CCP showering them with gifts at random |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
400
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 08:00:00 -
[599] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:l0rd carlos wrote:Kate stark wrote:also, generally, the people in the poker tournament put some extra effort in (you know, turning up to the poker tournament, and winning it) vs somer doing nothing that isn't day-to-day business for them. You make it sound like as if creating and maintaining a well know eve online fansite + infrastructure and handling with employees is effortless. This is a good point actually. While we totally understand that everyone has different opinions on different projects, there's no denying that it's not an everyday task to build something that a lot of our players like and use regularly. That goes for a lot of our fansites and other contributors. I'm constantly amazed at the sheer number of high level stuff we see coming from our community members.
But it's not a fansite ! |

Kate stark
616
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 08:07:00 -
[600] - Quote
still no real worth while answers, guess i'll check back tomorrow. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2683
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:02:00 -
[601] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Ice Pirateer wrote:Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible? Bump ? ^^^ What? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?Bueller? Anyone? h e r r r r r o e ?
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Rammix
TheMurk
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:15:00 -
[602] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:You have some reading to do. No, you have. This CCP Guard wrote: Note that we haven't said that the ISW will never be given out again in any sort of giveaway. Just that we're pausing rewards of this nature until we are sure they make sense or have a framework ensuring they make sense :)
and more importantly this CCP Guard wrote:In this dev blog prior to Fanfest 2012, we announced that the ISW was not exclusive and would evntually be made available to everyone eventually: "This leads on to another question, does this mean we will be seeing ship skins for sale in the NeX store or by some other method? That is currently not the plan and is not in development so the short answer is no. The Ishukone Scorpion was already created as the first prototype and Game Design plan to release it to everyone at some stage." edit: p.s. quotations from this topic The five unique ships given to SOMER to use as prizes for the EVE Vegas lottery were not IWSs; it was specifically stated that those five ships were created for that event (after the Gold Magnate issue came up), and they would never be given out again (as Shai 'Hulud quoted). If you had bothered to read the quote or the link, you would know that, and that these were the ships Shai 'Hulud was referring to in his post, and you would not look quite so foolish right now. I won't look foolish because we discuss IWS. And we discuss not eve vegas, we discuss those gifts which were given for contribution to community. Don't speculate mixing different topics. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
TheMurk
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 09:39:00 -
[603] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:2 years ago I made a post asking for CCP to quit the hypocrisy, throw the mask and make RMT "canon". To legalize RMT in any form except which is being done by the developer - AWFUL idea. Any form of legal RMT will provoke much more botting, macrosing etc activity. People should keep their RL business out of game worlds. If there are some games that allow RMT for players - those games are sh*t, I'm absolutely sure. When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world. It's lovely to see how there are always some people with those pocket, black and white truths. Let's see how easy is to prove you wrong: 1) EvE on paper is the "no RMT" game with some of the shadiest past about tolerance towards botters and has been plagued by botting and macroing since ever. 2) EvE is completely into RMT. PLEX is now a staple of EvE and also a big pillar in its economy. Does this make EvE "sh*t" as you say? Also, how unpopular it was, when CCP introduced purely 3rd party made video cards for PLEX (= RMT)? It was so unpopular that they sold out in a Blink  3) Games made to deal with RMT as a feature, HAVE to strongly deal and circumscribe botters, macroes and generally cheaters otherwise they screw up the very economic model they work upon. Rammix wrote: When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world
if you remove the blah blah and the high horse, you find out that EvE tried to introduce "golden ammo". Not a Korean grinder but your truly, noble EvE. GREED IS GOOD, wasn't it? As I said, hypocrital players got their hypocrical game. Plex is being sold officially by the game developer. If there is an only seller (developer) which is not an ingame political force - that's ok. Plex don't produce isk, it's just a trade tool. Players can't (legally) normally get RL money for plex. Selling videocards for plex was wrong, but it's not a continous practice, and I hope such things won't happen again, at least not periodically. You're misenterpreting things and speculate with formulations. I assume you're engaged in RMT or really want to be.
If you're buying ships for plex you got from the game developer (and those ships are expendables, so it's not a "classic" donation system) - it's one thing. But if you're ratting / trading / or maybe even botting and selling that ISK to get RL money - it's totally another thing. If players come into game for RL money - not just for fun and because they love the game - they break the gameplay for all other players who are in there _to play_.
Extreme cases like somer etc must be dealt with (ceazed) by ccp, to prevent mixing real-life business with ingame business. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4397
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 10:01:00 -
[604] - Quote
Rammix wrote: Plex is being sold officially by the game developer. If there is an only seller (developer) which is not an ingame political force - that's ok.
Not entirely true and perfectly cogent with the "set head under sand and keep it tight" approach. We have had situations where some rogue CCP employees helped this or that coalition.
Also, by official admission, they manipulate the PLEX market to keep it within their defined parameters. Considering PLEX is a major market, asset and commodity in game, controlling it IS a political act.
Rammix wrote: Plex don't produce isk, it's just a trade tool.
Neither the spawned ships for Somer produce ISK, yet some thousands posts seem to say it's not OK either.
Rammix wrote: Selling videocards for plex was wrong, but it's not a continous practice, and I hope such things won't happen again, at least not periodically.
I loved it and hope it'll expand A LOT. Those of us who don't suck at EvE can finally make a game currency useful for their life. I prefer having a new computer bought "out of nowhere" (ISK) than having 1 trillion in wallet I don't know what to do with.
Rammix wrote: You're misenterpreting things and speculate with formulations. I assume you're engaged in RMT or really want to be.
"Engaged in RMT"? Your accusations make me laugh. You ASSume against someone who slowly became trusted 3rd party and auditor, years in the field... Try with somebody else.
What I'd like is to have official ways to express my ability with the markets so that I can tangibly impact on my RL thanks to my results. If it's a video card, fine. If it's a 1:5 scale Rifter model even better!
Rammix wrote: Extreme cases like somer etc must be dealt with (ceazed) by ccp, to prevent mixing real-life business with ingame business.
Yet you and the other bunch of whitened tombs never said "DUH!" for years and years, while Somer became the huge power that is today.
You woke up way too late to be credible and teach lessons. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kalindra Chan
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 10:21:00 -
[605] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:2 years ago I made a post asking for CCP to quit the hypocrisy, throw the mask and make RMT "canon". To legalize RMT in any form except which is being done by the developer - AWFUL idea. Any form of legal RMT will provoke much more botting, macrosing etc activity. People should keep their RL business out of game worlds. If there are some games that allow RMT for players - those games are sh*t, I'm absolutely sure. When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world. It's lovely to see how there are always some people with those pocket, black and white truths. Let's see how easy is to prove you wrong: 1) EvE on paper is the "no RMT" game with some of the shadiest past about tolerance towards botters and has been plagued by botting and macroing since ever. 2) EvE is completely into RMT. PLEX is now a staple of EvE and also a big pillar in its economy. Does this make EvE "sh*t" as you say? Also, how unpopular it was, when CCP introduced purely 3rd party made video cards for PLEX (= RMT)? It was so unpopular that they sold out in a Blink  3) Games made to deal with RMT as a feature, HAVE to strongly deal and circumscribe botters, macroes and generally cheaters otherwise they screw up the very economic model they work upon. Rammix wrote: When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world
if you remove the blah blah and the high horse, you find out that EvE tried to introduce "golden ammo". Not a Korean grinder but your truly, noble EvE. GREED IS GOOD, wasn't it? As I said, hypocrital players got their hypocrical game. Plex is being sold officially by the game developer. If there is an only seller (developer) which is not an ingame political force - that's ok. Plex don't produce isk, it's just a trade tool. Players can't (legally) normally get RL money for plex. Selling videocards for plex was wrong, but it's not a continous practice, and I hope such things won't happen again, at least not periodically. You're misenterpreting things and speculate with formulations. I assume you're engaged in RMT or really want to be. If you're buying ships for plex you got from the game developer (and those ships are expendables, so it's not a "classic" donation system) - it's one thing. But if you're ratting / trading / or maybe even botting and selling that ISK to get RL money - it's totally another thing. If players come into game for RL money - not just for fun and because they love the game - they break the gameplay for all other players who are in there _to play_. Extreme cases like somer etc must be dealt with (ceazed) by ccp, to prevent mixing real-life business with ingame business.
my words exactly!
I came here to play eve online, because it was a sandbox i choose to play in because i like the idea the dev's had, the story, the gameplay, etc.
There is enough "wrong" and "bad" going on in our real life world which is so complex that it is very difficult to deal with, difficult to do anything against it. I dont wont to go into the real life world problematic for it would be far to much to cover here. Just one thing, the minority of the world population is living a good life standard on the cost of the vast rest.
It makes me even sick that i am sitting here at my computer playing things like eve and on the other hand people are dying because they dont even have fresh water to drink and something to eat! And yet i still do npthing about it which is wrong!
So, since i choose to play eve because of the sandbox thought, the gameplay etc AND because there wasnt such sh..t going on we couldnt do anything against it! Don't get me wrong, it is still bad to shoot other players in-game, even to scam in-game... but it is part of the game and everyone playing it is accepting the rules of that sandbox. If someone is getting to angry because of such in-game things, then he/she just has to quit the game.
In our real world it isn't that easy to handle the bad things. We cannot go around and shoot the people doing bad things for example and so on...
What we want to hear is an official statement of CCP to that extreme penetration of that sandbox we loved due to 3rd party tools/websites. So i would then know CCP's future plans and can decide to live with it or stop, because i dont want to read any more comments on this topic and i bet nobody else too (except for those of course, who have a forum read and write fetish)...
I am sure i forgot somethings and appologize for my bad writing. It is so hard for me writing my thoug
I'm a trap! |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1437
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 10:32:00 -
[606] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:5) CCP just wont give up the 'SOMERblink is a community hub, does good for the eve community and is altruistic' campaign. Most players hate SOMERblink. To be honest, I doubt most players particularly care about SOMER one way or another, and stating "Most players hate SOMERblink" undermines what is otherwise a good post. This isn't about SOMER directly, this is about CCP arbitrarily picking the winners and losers in what is supposed to be a player-driven sandbox.
I for one, had not, to the best of my knowledge, ever heard of SBlink.
Perhaps that is because I do not gamble. This is not a signature. |

Kalindra Chan
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 10:34:00 -
[607] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: Extreme cases like somer etc must be dealt with (ceazed) by ccp, to prevent mixing real-life business with ingame business.
Yet you and the other bunch of whitened tombs never said "DUH!" for years and years, while Somer became the huge power that is today. You woke up way too late to be credible and teach lessons.
I for my part had a break from end of 2009 to July 2013 and i first heared of Somer blink about one week ago and only because of that "ccp navigator / somer blink free special ships secretly" incident.
If I would have known of somer blinks lottery business outside of the game accepted and even praised by ccp before i startet playing eve online again 3 months ago, i would have NEVER startet again!
I bet a lot of players dont even know about somer blinks out of game business yet! I'm a trap! |

Rammix
TheMurk
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 10:42:00 -
[608] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: We have had situations where some rogue CCP employees helped this or that coalition.
Extreme cases, not common practice. And they must be prevented or ceased.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Also, by official admission, they manipulate the PLEX market to keep it within their defined parameters. Considering PLEX is a major market, asset and commodity in game, controlling it IS a political act.
They rebalance ships, change sov mechanics etc - political acts also. But what is important - they don't do it for their own political organization ingame. They rather do changes to the gaming experience as a whole.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Neither the spawned ships for Somer produce ISK, yet some thousands posts seem to say it's not OK either.
Sure. The problem is not ships, but those whom the ships were given to, and for what.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I loved it and hope it'll expand A LOT. Those of us who don't suck at EvE can finally make a game currency useful for their life. I prefer having a new computer bought "out of nowhere" (ISK) than having 1 trillion in wallet I don't know what to do with.
It can be acceptable as a short term event, with limited amount of videocards, with limit to how many of those can get in one player's hands.. with limits.. with limits.. :) Those limits are hard to control to prevent any significant impact on the game. Just to illustrate: if they started selling videocards for plex like in a shop, it would become very dangerous for the game.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: "Engaged in RMT"? Your accusations make me laugh. You ASSume against someone who slowly became trusted 3rd party and auditor, years in the field... Try with somebody else.
What I'd like is to have official ways to express my ability with the markets so that I can tangibly impact on my RL thanks to my results. If it's a video card, fine. If it's a 1:5 scale Rifter model even better! ... Yet you and the other bunch of whitened tombs never said "DUH!" for years and years, while Somer became the huge power that is today.
You woke up way too late to be credible and teach lessons.
If you want to start steadily and continuously turning your ingame achievements into RL money - it means you want to trade ingame wealth for real life money (real money trade). If you just want to get a rifter model for isk and have no intention of getting them regularly to sell IRL - sorry, I misunderstood your attitude and intentions. ... I didn't know almost anything about somer, I saw an ingame advertisement once or twice and ignored it, because I don't like lotteries (people getting other people's money just because they were "luckily" chosen by a third party, which they decided to trust).
edit Reached the limit for quotations, couldn't quote everything separately.  OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1438
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 11:30:00 -
[609] - Quote
Anyone know the history of S Blink?
Are they an outside gambling site which alighted upon Eve, or were they originally a player corp who came up with an isk making (a fool and his isk are easily parted) idea? This is not a signature. |

Kate stark
616
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 11:33:00 -
[610] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: Plex don't produce isk, it's just a trade tool.
Neither the spawned ships for Somer produce ISK, yet some thousands posts seem to say it's not OK either.
except plex is given to any player in exchange for a sum of real life currency. plex isn't given out "just because" and only limited to people ccp want to give it to, unlike the scorpions.
stop comparing apples to oranges. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Kalindra Chan
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 11:50:00 -
[611] - Quote
And another not yet mentioned but very important aspect:
From the official Eve online site:
Quote: C. Children (1) Responsibility for Account
Minor children may not establish an Account without the consent of a parent or guardian. If the user of EVE is a minor, a parent or guardian must complete the registration process to establish an Account, in which case the parent or guardian takes full responsibility for all obligations under the EULA and for all activities of the child using the Account. If you are a parent or guardian, you may permit one child to use the Account instead of you (in which case you may not use that Account).
If you establish an Account, you represent that you are an adult thirteen (13) years of age or older and are either accepting the EULA on behalf of yourself or on behalf of your child, in which latter case you agree to the EULA with regard to your child and represent that you are also personally bound by the EULA. (2) Game Rating
EVE has a "TEEN" rating. Parents may find it inappropriate for use by children under the age of thirteen (13).
Soooo, since here in Germany and i bet many other counties too, participating in lottery is illegal if you are under 18 years of age! By letting those kids participate in lottery, you know you are breaking even more laws. I'm a trap! |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
242
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 12:07:00 -
[612] - Quote
Kalindra Chan wrote:Soooo, since here in Germany and i bet many other counties too, participating in lottery is illegal if you are under 18 years of age! By letting those kids participate in lottery, you know you are breaking even more laws. I wish people would stop bringing up RL gambling law into this. It simply doesn't apply. Legally speaking, you as a player neither own the ISK you pay to Somer nor do you own the in-game prizes you might win. And Somer doesn't own any of those either. Legally everything is owned by CCP. This isn't any more RL gambling than any board game involving dice and fake money, like say Monopoly.
So bringing this up over and over again is just distracting from the actual issues. |

Frying Doom
2593
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 12:11:00 -
[613] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Kalindra Chan wrote:Soooo, since here in Germany and i bet many other counties too, participating in lottery is illegal if you are under 18 years of age! By letting those kids participate in lottery, you know you are breaking even more laws. I wish people would stop bringing up RL gambling law into this. It simply doesn't apply. Legally speaking, you as a player neither own the ISK you pay to Somer nor do you own the in-game prizes you might win. And Somer doesn't own any of those either. Legally everything is owned by CCP. This isn't any more RL gambling than any board game involving dice and fake money, like say Monopoly. So bringing this up over and over again is just distracting from the actual issues. So nothing at all like exchanging money for chips in a casino and gambling with those chips then?
You can buy plex with cash and use that fake money to gamble.
Personally I have nothing against gambling but what is involved is not fake money. The only difference is that as the gambler you can not convert it back into cash. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Jimmy Farrere
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 12:15:00 -
[614] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Kalindra Chan wrote:Soooo, since here in Germany and i bet many other counties too, participating in lottery is illegal if you are under 18 years of age! By letting those kids participate in lottery, you know you are breaking even more laws. I wish people would stop bringing up RL gambling law into this. It simply doesn't apply. Legally speaking, you as a player neither own the ISK you pay to Somer nor do you own the in-game prizes you might win. And Somer doesn't own any of those either. Legally everything is owned by CCP. This isn't any more RL gambling than any board game involving dice and fake money, like say Monopoly. So bringing this up over and over again is just distracting from the actual issues.
What about the real-life trips to Iceland being given as prizes on a site that you can top up your balance with real-life money?
|

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 12:40:00 -
[615] - Quote
Jimmy Farrere wrote:Rob Crowley wrote:Kalindra Chan wrote:Soooo, since here in Germany and i bet many other counties too, participating in lottery is illegal if you are under 18 years of age! By letting those kids participate in lottery, you know you are breaking even more laws. I wish people would stop bringing up RL gambling law into this. It simply doesn't apply. Legally speaking, you as a player neither own the ISK you pay to Somer nor do you own the in-game prizes you might win. And Somer doesn't own any of those either. Legally everything is owned by CCP. This isn't any more RL gambling than any board game involving dice and fake money, like say Monopoly. So bringing this up over and over again is just distracting from the actual issues. What about the real-life trips to Iceland being given as prizes on a site that you can top up your balance with real-life money? (and that was actually CCP's doing, not SOMER Blink's. Just goes to show how screwed up the whole thing is)
RL cash for RL prizes. That's pretty much the definition of RL gambling.
Or can Somer confirm that none of the RL items were bid on by people with bonus points and that all of the bidders were over their national minimum gambling age requirement? |

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
1394
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 13:05:00 -
[616] - Quote
I think the saddest part is that this episode means that the depth of thought that CCP put into their community development was: "what do lots of players use?" and "let's give them stuffz". That effort demonstrates the capacity of a child, not a team of supposed professionals. Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
242
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 14:54:00 -
[617] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Rob Crowley wrote:Legally everything is owned by CCP. This isn't any more RL gambling than any board game involving dice and fake money, like say Monopoly. So nothing at all like exchanging money for chips in a casino and gambling with those chips then? Correct, legally it's nothing at all like that. The difference is that you actually own the chips in a casino while you do not own ISK, PLEX or any other in-game assets. That incidentally is the reason why you can't turn any of it back into cash.
Jimmy Farrere wrote:What about the real-life trips to Iceland being given as prizes on a site that you can top up your balance with real-life money? I'm not a lawyer, but if the prizes are RL stuff shouldn't be important. What would make it RL gambling is if you pay for your bets with RL stuff. If that is somehow indirectly the case with Somer as you claim I don't know, seems like a rather complicated legal construct to untangle, and frankly I don't really care cause this is a totally independant issue from CCP giving them stuff which is the topic of this thread.
If you want to close down Somer for violation of RL gambling laws then feel free to pursue this in a separate thread. This thread is about CCP giving stuff to a CCP-picked for-profit in-game organization and the arguments made wouldn't be any different no matter if Somer is conducting RL gambling or not and for that matter the arguments wouldn't be different if it wasn't Somer but another for-profit in-game organization which had been picked. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
95
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:02:00 -
[618] - Quote
Rammix wrote: BTW I consider all ingame lotteries a scam. But scam is a part of gameplay, so I just didn't pay much attention to it.
All lotteries are scams, including ones IRL. They take in X amount of money from customers, and then give a fraction of it back. The difference being with IRL lotteries is that they're regulated. I've heard that new Blink accounts tend to win isk more easily when they first start in order to get them hooked. Is this true? Maybe, maybe not. In an IRL lottery that would be strictly illegal.
Likewise, there isn't a single person in all of Eve that can provide proof that Somer and his crew don't randomly insert their own alts into the lotto process if they choose to and make sure they come out with the winnings.
Nevertheless despite the total lack of oversight we have CCP employees coming out and officially vouching for their trustworthiness, telling everyone that "Somer has for years delivered on every blink, bonk, and whatever other stupid terms they use" all the while reading like bought and paid for advertisement. |

Shai 'Hulud
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:19:00 -
[619] - Quote
Rammix wrote:I won't look foolish because we discuss IWS. And we discuss not eve vegas, we discuss those gifts which were given for contribution to community. Don't speculate mixing different topics. Your reading comprehensions skills are ...
Title of the thread: "Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors"
Tell me where the words "Ishukone Works Scorpion" are in that title?
This topic is not just about the IWS's given to SOMER ... it's about all the recent, random gifts (including the IWS given to BIG). And when I discussed the other prizes I talked about it as "total amount gifted to SOMER."
This will be the last time I reply to you, as I fully expect you will reply with some completely irrelevant quote proving you RIGHT  All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Rammix
TheMurk
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:25:00 -
[620] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Rammix wrote: BTW I consider all ingame lotteries a scam. But scam is a part of gameplay, so I just didn't pay much attention to it.
All lotteries are scams, including ones IRL. RL lotteries are scam, banks are scam (usury), financial pyramids are scam, corporations like microsoft are scam, etc etc etc. It's a matter of another topic. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |
|

Jimmy Farrere
University of Caille Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:27:00 -
[621] - Quote
Rob Crowley wrote:Correct, legally it's nothing at all like that. The difference is that you actually own the chips in a casino while you do not own ISK, PLEX or any other in-game assets. That incidentally is the reason why you can't turn any of it back into cash. Well, actually you're wrong on that one. Casinos retain ownership of their chips and the only reason they hold value is because the house promises to honour their end of the deal. I agree that it's very hard to turn them back into cash though. Maybe if you could use all that credit to purchase entries into a competition with a prize worth thousands of dollars you could do it?
Rob Crowley wrote:Jimmy Farrere wrote:What about the real-life trips to Iceland being given as prizes on a site that you can top up your balance with real-life money? I'm not a lawyer, but if the prizes are RL stuff shouldn't be important. What would make it RL gambling is if you pay for your bets with RL stuff. If that is somehow indirectly the case with Somer as you claim I don't know, seems like a rather complicated legal construct to untangle, and frankly I don't really care cause this is a totally independant issue from CCP giving them stuff which is the topic of this thread. Not that difficult to untangle..
Buy Plex ($$$)-> convert to isk (game money)-> convert to blink credit (casino chips)-> gamble
I don't think the fact that you have to take 1 extra step before wagering is going to get past many gambling commisions.
Rob Crowley wrote:If you want to close down Somer for violation of RL gambling laws then feel free to pursue this in a separate thread. This thread is about CCP giving stuff to a CCP-picked for-profit in-game organization and the arguments made wouldn't be any different no matter if Somer is conducting RL gambling or not and for that matter the arguments wouldn't be different if it wasn't Somer but another for-profit in-game organization which had been picked. Nice of you to tell me what I can and can't talk about in this thread.
The reason it's important is that SOMER Blink is the entity that CCP has decided is most worthy of their gifts. Had they looked into this in any way they would have realised that SOMER are not only breaching the EULA but also very possibly a few real-life laws. |

Rammix
TheMurk
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 15:33:00 -
[622] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:I won't look foolish because we discuss IWS. And we discuss not eve vegas, we discuss those gifts which were given for contribution to community. Don't speculate mixing different topics. Your reading comprehensions skills are ... Title of the thread: "Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors" Tell me where the words "Ishukone Works Scorpion" are in that title? This topic is not just about the IWS's given to SOMER ... it's about all the recent, random gifts (including the IWS given to BIG). And when I discussed the other prizes I talked about it as "total amount gifted to SOMER." This will be the last time I reply to you, as I fully expect you will reply with some completely irrelevant quote proving you RIGHT  Whatever. Go see the OP on the 1st page. All this topic came out of the situation with somer, and that situation made ccp create this topic to announce they're going to rethink their approach.
I don't know why you can't "stop refreshing your aggression timer". You're not breaching my armor. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 16:06:00 -
[623] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Rammix wrote:I won't look foolish because we discuss IWS. And we discuss not eve vegas, we discuss those gifts which were given for contribution to community. Don't speculate mixing different topics. Your reading comprehensions skills are ... Title of the thread: "Announcement regarding rewards and prizes to fansites and third-party contributors" Tell me where the words "Ishukone Works Scorpion" are in that title? This topic is not just about the IWS's given to SOMER ... it's about all the recent, random gifts (including the IWS given to BIG). And when I discussed the other prizes I talked about it as "total amount gifted to SOMER." This will be the last time I reply to you, as I fully expect you will reply with some completely irrelevant quote proving you RIGHT  Whatever. Go see the OP on the 1st page. All this topic came out of the situation with somer, and that situation made ccp create this topic to announce they're going to rethink their approach. I don't know why you can't "stop refreshing your aggression timer". You're not breaching my armor.
You actually think the 5 unique ships, worth many times more than the IWSs, that were gifted to Somer are not part of this discussion?
OP - sentence 2:
CCP Guard wrote:There was also the matter of a recent special lottery event at SOMER Blink that CCP supported by contributing rare ships as prizes.
OK? |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1941
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 16:26:00 -
[624] - Quote
Jimmy Farrere wrote: Buy Plex ($$$)-> convert to isk (game money)-> convert to blink credit (casino chips)-> gamble
One difference.
You can convert casino chips back into real money.
You can't do that with blink credit. (and you can't do it with ISK, either).
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
95
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:13:00 -
[625] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:(and you can't do it with ISK, either).
You can if you're Somer and you bundle isk with GTC sales. People don't buy GTCs through Somer because the GTCs are different, it's because he sells packs of GTC+isk. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4397
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:19:00 -
[626] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: except plex is given to any player in exchange for a sum of real life currency. plex isn't given out "just because" and only limited to people ccp want to give it to, unlike the scorpions.
stop comparing apples to oranges.
You should inform yourself better about what's given "just because" and what's not. There's more than Somer in this game and the prizes given through the years are more than PLEXes. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:19:00 -
[627] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Jimmy Farrere wrote: Buy Plex ($$$)-> convert to isk (game money)-> convert to blink credit (casino chips)-> gamble
One difference. You can convert casino chips back into real money. You can't do that with blink credit. (and you can't do it with ISK, either).
Please go back about 5 pages and read again.
|

Kalindra Chan
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:20:00 -
[628] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Jimmy Farrere wrote: Buy Plex ($$$)-> convert to isk (game money)-> convert to blink credit (casino chips)-> gamble
One difference. You can convert casino chips back into real money. You can't do that with blink credit. (and you can't do it with ISK, either).
You can actually and most people do, although it is legalized by CCP and part of the game for a long time. It is called buying a GTC, convert it into a PLEX and sell it.
So i am paying your subscription for 30 days and you give me isk for that.
I can live with that though, because it doesnt matter who pays CCP the monthly subscription for the active account. I have to admit, i am buying plexes too and sell them, because i am earning much more money in real life in one hour than i make isk per hour in game. When i would break that mark i would stop selling plexes and buy them instead.
The plex thing is still not good, because it takes away so much from that game what it makes it worth playing, but well so it is.
But i have to agree with one thing here, those aspects as important as they may be for this discussion here, are getting more and more off topic.
Sorry for that! I'm a trap! |

Kate stark
617
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:38:00 -
[629] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Kate stark wrote: except plex is given to any player in exchange for a sum of real life currency. plex isn't given out "just because" and only limited to people ccp want to give it to, unlike the scorpions.
stop comparing apples to oranges.
You should inform yourself better about what's given "just because" and what's not. There's more than Somer in this game and the prizes given through the years are more than PLEXes.
it doesn't matter who did and didn't get prizes. the entire process of handing out billions of isk of in-game assets with no defined criteria is bad regardless of who did and didn't get things. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4397
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:51:00 -
[630] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Kate stark wrote: except plex is given to any player in exchange for a sum of real life currency. plex isn't given out "just because" and only limited to people ccp want to give it to, unlike the scorpions.
stop comparing apples to oranges.
You should inform yourself better about what's given "just because" and what's not. There's more than Somer in this game and the prizes given through the years are more than PLEXes. it doesn't matter who did and didn't get prizes. the entire process of handing out billions of isk of in-game assets with no defined criteria is bad regardless of who did and didn't get things.
Sure but that does not change that when I write stuff, it's for a reason. And if you make exceptions, you have to be ready to know more than I do or know what they give first hand, like I do. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Kate stark
618
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 17:53:00 -
[631] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Kate stark wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Kate stark wrote: except plex is given to any player in exchange for a sum of real life currency. plex isn't given out "just because" and only limited to people ccp want to give it to, unlike the scorpions.
stop comparing apples to oranges.
You should inform yourself better about what's given "just because" and what's not. There's more than Somer in this game and the prizes given through the years are more than PLEXes. it doesn't matter who did and didn't get prizes. the entire process of handing out billions of isk of in-game assets with no defined criteria is bad regardless of who did and didn't get things. Sure but that does not change that when I write stuff, it's for a reason. And if you make exceptions, you have to be ready to know more than I do or know what they give first hand, like I do.
i didn't make any exceptions.
i just pointed out scorpions are not plex, and that a bad idea was bad. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1941
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 18:02:00 -
[632] - Quote
Kalindra Chan wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Jimmy Farrere wrote: Buy Plex ($$$)-> convert to isk (game money)-> convert to blink credit (casino chips)-> gamble
One difference. You can convert casino chips back into real money. You can't do that with blink credit. (and you can't do it with ISK, either). You can actually and most people do, although it is legalized by CCP and part of the game for a long time. It is called buying a GTC, convert it into a PLEX and sell it. So i am paying your subscription for 30 days and you give me isk for that. I can live with that though, because it doesnt matter who pays CCP the monthly subscription for the active account. I have to admit, i am buying plexes too and sell them, because i am earning much more money in real life in one hour than i make isk per hour in game. When i would break that mark i would stop selling plexes and buy them instead. The plex thing is still not good, because it takes away so much from that game what it makes it worth playing, but well so it is. But i have to agree with one thing here, those aspects as important as they may be for this discussion here, are getting more and more off topic. Sorry for that!
I have a billion ISK. Tell me how I can convert that into real money please?
Oh, and I've already plexed my accounts for the next year.
You see my point?
There's no transfer into real money. Not having to pay for accounts isn't the same as conversion into real money.
Bear in mind I'm not talking about the commission someone can get for GTC sales. That's a totally different matter. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Jimmy Farrere
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 18:09:00 -
[633] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:
I have a billion ISK. Tell me how I can convert that into real money please?
Oh, and I've already plexed my accounts for the next year.
You see my point?
There's no transfer into real money. Not having to pay for accounts isn't the same as conversion into real money.
Bear in mind I'm not talking about the commission someone can get for GTC sales. That's a totally different matter.
You can't, and that's why no-one is accusing you of being involved in RMT. If you are SOMER Blink however you bundle the isk up with a GTC and sell it. |

Rammix
TheMurk
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 18:11:00 -
[634] - Quote
Ruskarn Andedare wrote: You actually think the 5 unique ships, worth many times more than the IWSs, that were gifted to Somer are not part of this discussion?
Don't bend my words and thoughts. Those 5 ships ARE important, but THIS topic was NOT about them. People may mention whatever they want, but in any topic the OP makes the theme and what is out of the OP's line - is an offtopic.
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:OP - sentence 2: CCP Guard wrote:There was also the matter of a recent special lottery event at SOMER Blink that CCP supported by contributing rare ships as prizes. OK? Obviously it's just a side note. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1941
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 18:22:00 -
[635] - Quote
Jimmy Farrere wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:
I have a billion ISK. Tell me how I can convert that into real money please?
Oh, and I've already plexed my accounts for the next year.
You see my point?
There's no transfer into real money. Not having to pay for accounts isn't the same as conversion into real money.
Bear in mind I'm not talking about the commission someone can get for GTC sales. That's a totally different matter.
You can't, and that's why no-one is accusing you of being involved in RMT. If you are SOMER Blink however you bundle the isk up with a GTC and sell it.
Not quite.
The sale is made by Markee Dragon. They pass a little money to Somer as a commission for that. Markee Dragon also gives the buyer a code that they can redeem with Blink for Blink Credit. (You can't cash out directly. you have to win something.)
I'm not justifying it one way or another. Just clarifying. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 18:56:00 -
[636] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Not quite.
The sale is made by Markee Dragon. They pass a little money to Somer as a commission for that. Markee Dragon also gives the buyer a code that they can redeem with Blink for Blink Credit. (You can't cash out directly. you have to win something.)
I'm not justifying it one way or another. Just clarifying.
For the 100th time, it doesn't matter how many steps are in the process- you still get isk out of it, it is still RMT.
If RMT sites offered 'RMTSite.com credit' that you could convert to isk through bidding on billion isk packages, would that make it ok? No. There really isn't any grey line here, somer is converting his extra isk to cash by giving it away if you buy GTC from him. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4397
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 19:11:00 -
[637] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: i didn't make any exceptions.
i just pointed out scorpions are not plex, and that a bad idea was bad.
And I just pointed out how PLEX are a non ISK faucet like scorpions are, and did not say it was a good idea. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
278
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:24:00 -
[638] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Ruskarn Andedare wrote: You actually think the 5 unique ships, worth many times more than the IWSs, that were gifted to Somer are not part of this discussion?
Don't bend my words and thoughts. Those 5 ships ARE important, but THIS topic was NOT about them. People may mention whatever they want, but in any topic the OP makes the theme and what is out of the OP's line - is an offtopic. edit Oh, whatever. Tired of this meaningless dispute. Gifts to somer are bad, public advertisement of somer by ccp is bad. That's all I really had to say.
Hey, chill, wasn't an attack - just pointing out the OP had put them in the topic |

Kate stark
618
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:30:00 -
[639] - Quote
monday tomorrow. wonder if CCP will have anything new to say to us. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
71
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 20:54:00 -
[640] - Quote
I was wondering,
If CCP want to :
- continue to associate with a gambling site - endorse gambling - continue to 'white knight" a gambling site - continue to support a gambling site - vouch for a gambling site
then shouldn't Eve then be / become an adults only game, ( for those over 18 / 21 )?
Is there some sort of real life law / legal requirement if CCP continue to support Somer, ( or any other Eve related gambling site )?
To clarify, I absolutely do not support Somer, infact I believe it's a scam and that it's involved in RMT. I would like to see CCP to stop associating / "white knighting" / supporting / vouching for what is a parasitic site.
CCP, please be logical and try to maintain what little intregrity you have left. Please, do not choose money over integrity. Please disassociate yourself from Somer. |
|

Large Collidable Object
morons.
2337
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 21:05:00 -
[641] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
And I just pointed out how PLEX are a non ISK faucet like scorpions are, and did not say it was a good idea.
Scorpions aren't an isk faucet either - isk faucets are mechanics spawning isk into eves economy out of nothing, such as bounties, mission rewards, blue loot or insurance.
However, due to the fact they can't be built by players, their supply can't be predicted by supply and demand, but arbitrary 'community' team decisions, rendering them highly volatile speculation objects, ending up as completely disconnected to a player driven economy.
Now the people winning them at the poker tournament might have thought they received unique items.
When the Somer team realized they successfully scammed CCP, they decided to keep it secret because they knew an RMT gambling site receiving them for doing what an RMT gambling site does would let their value plummet.
Somer actually profits from CCPs system both ways - newbs buy plex from them because they get an additional chance to win that oh-so expensive ship, bittervets use it to cash out at least a fraction of the isk they invested.
The dividend goes to Somer with the typical casino 'zero - bank wins' percentage as an icing on the cake.
Good Job Somer., CCP fell for it, pass the cost on to the user and end up rewarding Somer for it twice in a row...
Wow - just wow...
And I thought I was a drunk moron. You know... morons. |
|

ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
169

|
Posted - 2013.10.13 21:52:00 -
[642] - Quote
2 personal attack posts, an off-topic post, a ranting post, and a moderation discussion post have been removed.
Forum rule 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Forum rule 26. Off-topic posting is prohibited. Forum rule 3. Ranting is prohibited. Forum rule 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
ISD Tyrozan Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department @ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL |
|

Delen Ormand
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
200
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:29:00 -
[643] - Quote
Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value.
Kinda late, but posting to say I like this approach. I like the idea of in-game rewards, but I'm not comfortable with giving out stuff that has ISK value. The above seems like a good solution. |

Rammix
TheMurk
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:36:00 -
[644] - Quote
Delen Ormand wrote:Synthetic Cultist wrote:CCP Guard wrote: Should we stick to out-of-game things only? Create non-transferrable in-game items as rewards? Give no personal rewards and only prizes? Only items below a certain expected ISK value? Always give out tons of stuff at once so early recipients canGÇÖt cash out? List all rewards publicly?
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Items such as the memorabilia things in the "time capsule", would reward people with a permanent reminder of their impact on the EVE world. Those things like the "Piece of Steve", relating to the first Titan shot down, or the "Assassination Contract - Mirial", or the "Band of Brothers Director Key". Souvenir items that don't do anything much ingame, beside exist. Those sorts of items would be perfectly fine, to reward people for contributing. Or inspace monuments, such as was done in the past, e.g. the Jita Monument originally commemorated a competition between players, yes ? Monuments and souvenir items, people would have far fewer issues with, than things that have a definable ISK value. Kinda late, but posting to say I like this approach. I like the idea of in-game rewards, but I'm not comfortable with giving out stuff that has ISK value. The above seems like a good solution. Yeah, right. And to try to draw attention once more: drones deserve a monument. They've done much more than somer, BTW.  OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4397
|
Posted - 2013.10.13 22:44:00 -
[645] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
And I just pointed out how PLEX are a non ISK faucet like scorpions are, and did not say it was a good idea.
Scorpions aren't an isk faucet either - isk faucets are mechanics spawning isk into eves economy out of nothing, such as bounties, mission rewards, blue loot or insurance.
I think you misread my statement and it's my fault because of my poor English. I should have written:
"And I just pointed out how PLEX are a non ISK faucet like scorpions are (not an ISK faucet), and did not say it was a good idea."
In my tongue the parenthesis bit may be omitted and is implied. I realize English might work differently than that.
Large Collidable Object wrote: However, due to the fact they can't be built by players, their supply can't be predicted by supply and demand, but arbitrary 'community' team decisions, rendering them highly volatile speculation objects, ending up as completely disconnected to a player driven economy.
And here you are technically wrong. Everything, even State Ravens are subject to supply and demand PLUS speculation. Speculation is not exactly an heterogenous factor vs supply and demand, it's an emotional factor that overlays them.
The given ships just happen to have a much bigger speculation component than normal and thus higher emotional factor affecting supply and demand. Demand trending to +infinite while supply is small and finite. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 00:45:00 -
[646] - Quote
sally Deninard wrote:I really still am no clearer on this matter at all. The problem of the scorpions is that the award could be classed as "over the top and plain odd " as compared to other in game organisations. Eve uni for example does good things.... but you don`t give EVERY SINGLE eve uni member a free ship.
As for the lottery, much the same. You effectively custom skinned a ship for SOMER, it`s just over the top and makes it smell of corruption. The fanfest prizes too, each trip could fund Eve radio(which relies on paying subscribers to survive) for months. It just seems odd?
This is my most major question. Some players could not compete on the somer site due to somers own 3rd party toc`s and banning. The CSM told you this and you ignored them indirectly shutting out the opportunity to win these prizes. Why did you ignore the csm on this matter and what are you going to do for the players that could not compete on the somer site?
to quote from the csm thread "However, the requirement that one must be a member of SOMER Blink in order to participate remains, and for a lottery with such significant prizes, is very troubling to us. Furthermore, the structure of the lottery, which encourages and rewards extensive use of SOMER Blink, may raise legal concerns in some jurisdictions. For example, in the United States, commercial lotteries cannot require the purchase of a product or service in order to receive an entry.
For this reason, we strongly suggest that the entry mechanic be adjusted as follows:
1) Members of SOMER Blink are automatically entered into the lottery and receive one ticket, regardless of how much they use the site.
2) An alternate method (such as posting in a particular thread) be used to allow people to enter who do not wish to become a member of SOMER Blink."
Wow I feel dizzy now. I actually managed to read through all 31 pages of this thread! I don't have a very big beef with CCP handing out these rewards, or with Somer (I play there, loose and win a lot of ISK although sadly mostly loose). I think it's great to see the many thoughtful and considered replies from CCP through CCP Guard, thanks for that!
I do feel that 3 of the most interesting posts in this entire 31 page thread have been overlooked by CCP Guard (understandably so).
The post I find most interesting and relevant in the thread and which have not been addressed by CCP yet are:
Page 1: Maximus Andendare #3Posted: 2013.10.10 18:38
Page 9: Sally Deninard #174Posted: 2013.10.10 21:44 (the post I have quoted above).
Page 12: Kuni Oichi #232Posted: 2013.10.11 01:10
Most of the posts in the 31 page thread have been answered repeatedly and patiently by CCP Guard but there are several points in the 3 posts mentioned above that have not been answered yet .
I think it would be really interesting if CCP Guard or CCP could give an answer (boiled down) to the points in these 3 posts . I would be really curious to see it, thanks! :-)
And lastly, thanks for a great game, for providing support to community events (even if improvements can be made), and for taking the time to address player concerns in a thread like this! o7
|

Lelira Cirim
EVE University Ivy League
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 03:43:00 -
[647] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: ...List all rewards publicly?... -snip- Secretly...nothing. And what we've given out as rewards or prizes doesn't generally come in big bundles which is one of the key reasons eyebrows were raised over this incident.
It's worth keeping in mind that Internal Affairs has complete oversight over every single item spawned or transferred on our server and monitors all staff account activity closely as is their purpose.
I think a public list of all rewards is definitely the next logical step, and the IA department would seem to be the right ones to make it available. Make it so.
There is no reason the gift needs to be private, but what people do with their rewards is their business. "X to SOMER Blink (corporation); Quantity Y; Reason: Z" should be the end of it. That is probably very much the same data as the "ticket" request to spawn the items in the first place.
I don't especially care that they allocated one ship per employee, but since that appears to be exactly how the numbers are chosen, the reason can reflect "Y employees".
Digital items are duty-free. I can't imagine the sheer expense and logistical nightmare of only out-of-game rewards. Whose responsibility is it to ship them? Nothing besides CCP to each (worldwide) player makes any sense. How much overhead will it add to the company to deal with claims of lost items, undelivered and returned packages... that will simply drive costs up in the long run and reduce the frequency that rewards are given. Do not actively tank my patience. |

Lelira Cirim
EVE University Ivy League
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 03:58:00 -
[648] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Any form of legal RMT will provoke much more botting, macrosing etc activity. People should keep their RL business out of game worlds. If there are some games that allow RMT for players - those games are sh*t, I'm absolutely sure. When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world. Wot, are you saying Second Life isn't a healthy virtual world?   That's what's behind the captain's quarters door you know. First comes the bar you can hang out at, then come drink recipes and crafting Quafe, visiting a tailor and making your own clothing designs... and from there it's just a short slippery slope to flying furries and StarFox Online.     Do not actively tank my patience. |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 04:00:00 -
[649] - Quote
Iosue wrote:as others have hinted at, i suspect this has more to do with the encouragement of a third-party site that brings revenue to ccp via plex sales, than anything else. if this is true, i think it should be approached in a different way. rather than calling it a reward, which implies that the recipient is receiving something for a good or noble deed, call it what it is: compensation.
there's nothing wrong with compensating those that help you improve your bottom line. but why not offer something that they really want and is more in line with compensation, like cash. this way you don't effect the game economy at all and are able to give the recipient something they really value. there's a reason bonus's work so well at encouraging certain behaviors in the real world, because people like money.
I actually agree very much with the above statement by losue. I do think a lot of sites give more back to EVE than Somer Blink does and thus are more deserving of in-game 'rewards' (which I think is a nice concept), but Somer Blink definitely without a single doubt are very very good at pushing the sale of GTC through Markee Dragon and as such helps bring in income for CCP, and I think that if CCP wants to compensate them for this, then yes they deserve it and CCP should be more than free to do this.
I just think a spoon should be called a spoon, in which case I doubt there would have been the same kind of 'drama' :-)  |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
73
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 04:38:00 -
[650] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:Iosue wrote:as others have hinted at, i suspect this has more to do with the encouragement of a third-party site that brings revenue to ccp via plex sales, than anything else. if this is true, i think it should be approached in a different way. rather than calling it a reward, which implies that the recipient is receiving something for a good or noble deed, call it what it is: compensation.
there's nothing wrong with compensating those that help you improve your bottom line. but why not offer something that they really want and is more in line with compensation, like cash. this way you don't effect the game economy at all and are able to give the recipient something they really value. there's a reason bonus's work so well at encouraging certain behaviors in the real world, because people like money. I actually agree very much with the above statement by losue. I do think a lot of sites give more back to EVE than Somer Blink does, relative to what they gain from it, and thus are more deserving of in-game 'rewards' (which I think is a nice concept), but Somer Blink definitely without a single doubt are very very good at pushing the sale of GTC through Markee Dragon and as such helps bring in income for CCP, and I think that if CCP wants to compensate them for this, then yes they deserve it and CCP should be more than free to do this. I just think a spoon should be called a spoon, in which case I doubt there would have been the same kind of 'drama' :-) 
I'm sorry, but I have to totally disagree with you.
Somer might be a means for more cash revenue for CCP, but rewarding / supporting a player run gambling site is not the correct way to do so.
Supporting Somer with in game rewards hurts the sandbox that Eve is.
Supporting Somer with any out of game rewards is not right. It endorses gambling.
Yes, my statement is weak and full of holes. I just don't know how to put it in words how wrong supporting, ( for what is, a scam and a RMT opportunity for Somer ), a player run gambling site is.
And the way you have commented on this, well it seems to be a way to RMT. |
|

Pingu
Cosmos Butt Pirates
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 05:43:00 -
[651] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:The rewards for the SOMER Blink staff was around three times larger than the one to the SCL staff but thatGÇÖs because they have three times the staff. In both cases everyone got one each.
I dont want to break any rumourmongering rule so...
This statement by a CCP employee states that the rewards are based on the levels of staff, is this the current policy and now that this policy is known by the playerbase and open to rather easy manipulation will it change?
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:00:00 -
[652] - Quote
ISD Tyrozan wrote:2 personal attack posts, an off-topic post, a ranting post, and a moderation discussion post have been removed.
Forum rule 4. Personal attacks are prohibited. Forum rule 26. Off-topic posting is prohibited. Forum rule 3. Ranting is prohibited. Forum rule 11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
Hundreds of posts later, and this is the first sign of any involvement from CCP.
It is just funny how they are happy to make the community outraged just so SOMERblink, an already filthy rich gambling scam, can get an extra few hundred billion isk (for free and spawned form nothing).
Can we have some kind of response?
We deserve a response... And one focusing on the issues we are discussing. Not another lame commitment to agenda this at the winter summit. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
406
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:15:00 -
[653] - Quote
So, how are we comming along or are CCP still hoping this is going to blow over and all will be right with Eve once more ? |

Archibald Thistlewaite III
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:24:00 -
[654] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:
It is just funny how they are happy to make the community outraged just so SOMERblink, an already filthy rich gambling scam, can get an extra few hundred billion isk (for free and spawned form nothing).
Can we have some kind of response?
We deserve a response... And one focusing on the issues we are discussing. Not another lame commitment to agenda this at the winter summit.
Can you please stop saying Somer have been given isk for free and spawned from nothing. They haven't and its confusing the very legitimate concerns the player base has. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:29:00 -
[655] - Quote
Well, hundreds of players have commented now with next to no CCP response.
In their frustration players are now showing anger in their posts, and breaking the EULA and CCP are deleting posts (and remaining silent).
I honestly feel like I have put more effort into this debate than any single member of CCP. How can nobody at CCP feel the same as I do about this?
I think I have already stomached as much of this as I can for one day. Ill check back again tomorrow.
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:32:00 -
[656] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:
It is just funny how they are happy to make the community outraged just so SOMERblink, an already filthy rich gambling scam, can get an extra few hundred billion isk (for free and spawned form nothing).
Can we have some kind of response?
We deserve a response... And one focusing on the issues we are discussing. Not another lame commitment to agenda this at the winter summit.
Can you please stop saying Somer have been given isk for free and spawned from nothing. They haven't and its confusing the very legitimate concerns the player base has.
lawl SOMERalt....
I forgot the iscorps were worth 30 trit (reprocess value).
And I doubt the sustained and continuing CCP campaign to advertise and promote SOMERblink has increased its gambling takings at all. |

Rammix
TheMurk
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:42:00 -
[657] - Quote
Second Life is not a game, it's a social network.
"When people mix their RL income with online sandbox-style game - you can't keep healthy virtual world." Obviously I was talking about keeping a virtual gaming world healthy. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
TheMurk
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:48:00 -
[658] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP are deleting posts
ISD are not CCP. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Archibald Thistlewaite III
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 11:54:00 -
[659] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:
It is just funny how they are happy to make the community outraged just so SOMERblink, an already filthy rich gambling scam, can get an extra few hundred billion isk (for free and spawned form nothing).
Can we have some kind of response?
We deserve a response... And one focusing on the issues we are discussing. Not another lame commitment to agenda this at the winter summit.
Can you please stop saying Somer have been given isk for free and spawned from nothing. They haven't and its confusing the very legitimate concerns the player base has. lawl SOMERalt.... I forgot the iscorps were worth 30 trit (reprocess value). And I doubt the sustained and continuing CCP campaign to advertise and promote SOMERblink has increased its gambling takings at all.
Nope, not interested in playing Somerblink.
You however do not understand the legitimate concerns being raised by the player base. No ISK was spawned, that doesn't mean CCP favoring Somer isn't an issue. I suggest you re-read the thread. |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 12:00:00 -
[660] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:
It is just funny how they are happy to make the community outraged just so SOMERblink, an already filthy rich gambling scam, can get an extra few hundred billion isk (for free and spawned form nothing).
Can we have some kind of response?
We deserve a response... And one focusing on the issues we are discussing. Not another lame commitment to agenda this at the winter summit.
Can you please stop saying Somer have been given isk for free and spawned from nothing. They haven't and its confusing the very legitimate concerns the player base has. lawl SOMERalt.... I forgot the iscorps were worth 30 trit (reprocess value). And I doubt the sustained and continuing CCP campaign to advertise and promote SOMERblink has increased its gambling takings at all. Nope, not interested in playing Somerblink. You however do not understand the legitimate concerns being raised by the player base. No ISK was spawned, that doesn't mean CCP favoring Somer isn't an issue. I suggest you re-read the thread.
The only legitimate concern in this thread is the illegitimacy of the gambling websites and the illegitimate spotlighting and rewarding of them by CCP.
|
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
206
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 12:58:00 -
[661] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Seriously though, Guard already sorted out and aligned the previous matter to a point where discussion and suggestions can be made to determine the rewards given to community services and fansites. The prizes still need to be settled and the guidelines that will qualify the entities to receive them still have to be written and publicly disclosed, but that matter is partially out of the way. However the matter regarding Somer Blink's use of isk tokens to reward those who buy a GCT through their referral system still needs to be addressed by Guard and/or other CCP representatives. We are aware that if CCP wants to they can turn a blind eye on this matter and interpret and/or change the game's EULA and specifically the rules of conduct about selling game currency/items for real money in a way that it won't make Somer Blink's actions illegitimate. This will however further confirm their favoritism and support of Somer Blink's actions within the sandbox and the game, so the question about whether other players will be able to engage in similar conducts still stands and requires their pronunciation on it so that an agreement can be aligned in the same way that it was for the community services and fansite rewards issue. Gogela wrote:
ATTN: CCP Guard
I would like to put up a link on a web property I own that sells 30, 60, and 90 day GTCs via affiliate link. I would like the same return on referrals that SOMER gets, and I want to offer 150, 300, and 450 million isk to players who purchase GTCs via my affiliate link. Is this possible?
BUMP |

Din Chao
386
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 15:54:00 -
[662] - Quote
Just posting this again, as there have been more than 10 pages since I posted this without any CCP response.
Din Chao wrote:Sorry if this question has already been answered (though based on what I've read of this thread, nothing of substance has actually been answered):
What kind of transparency, if any, has SOMER Blink given to CCP as to how their "lottery" actually works? How does CCP know for certain that SOMER is running a legitimate operation and what guarantee do you have that they will continue running this way in the future? Is CCP privy to the specifics of the transactions between SOMER and the players? Who at CCP is working with SOMER to ensure that they are not cheating on their lotteries and/or stealing from the players? Does SOMER random = random?
If these are questions that can't be answered, than how can CCP officially endorse SOMER Blink, effectively legitimizing what may or may not be legitimate?
You say SOMER was selected because of EVE Vegas, and SOMER being a gambling site. But the state of Nevada has a Gaming Commission, a government entity, whose job is to guarantee, to the best of their ability, the "fairness" of gambling in their state. Does CCP have such oversight?
EDIT: I see now that some of these questions/concerns were brought up in the FIRST reply to this thread and were completely ignored. I won't be holding my breath for a response...
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2687
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 16:54:00 -
[663] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Just posting this again, as there have been more than 10 pages since I posted this without any CCP response.
I think I would need a weekend away from the angry internet spaceship nerds from time to time too...
Also I'm not sure we're going to get an immediate response to some of these questions because I don't think CCP has the answer right now. They're probably going to want to have a power lunch over a few of these...
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Din Chao
389
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:13:00 -
[664] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Din Chao wrote:Just posting this again, as there have been more than 10 pages since I posted this without any CCP response.
I think I would need a weekend away from the angry internet spaceship nerds from time to time too... Also I'm not sure we're going to get an immediate response to some of these questions because I don't think CCP has the answer right now. They're probably going to want to have a power lunch over a few of these... No, don't get me wrong, I understand it was the weekend. But it's Monday now, and I don't think Columbus Day is observed in Iceland (though, I guess it could be another holiday, I haven't looked). The point was, I really would like these questions answered, and I didn't want them buried in the threadnaught.
As for the answers to my questions, these are all questions that they should have been able to answer BEFORE they decided to endorse SOMER. So, if they still need time to think about it, they're doing it wrong. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
210
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:25:00 -
[665] - Quote
By now they already realised the mess they got themselves into and are assessing the possible solutions for it, taking the time to choose the one that best fits their interests before they make another announcement. We might have to wait a bit. |

Kate stark
621
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:25:00 -
[666] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:monday tomorrow. wonder if CCP will have anything new to say to us.
home from work and nope.
not sure what i was expecting, really. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Interworld Venom
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:37:00 -
[667] - Quote
Whatever the rights and wrongs of the situation, ignoring hundreds of angry posts shows a startling level of arrogance and ignorance.
Over the weekend is one thing, but it must be past close of business in Iceland now, and they are clearly hoping we will just forget about it. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2689
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 17:58:00 -
[668] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Gogela wrote:Din Chao wrote:Just posting this again, as there have been more than 10 pages since I posted this without any CCP response.
I think I would need a weekend away from the angry internet spaceship nerds from time to time too... Also I'm not sure we're going to get an immediate response to some of these questions because I don't think CCP has the answer right now. They're probably going to want to have a power lunch over a few of these... No, don't get me wrong, I understand it was the weekend. But it's Monday now, and I don't think Columbus Day is observed in Iceland (though, I guess it could be another holiday, I haven't looked). The point was, I really would like these questions answered, and I didn't want them buried in the threadnaught. As for the answers to my questions, these are all questions that they should have been able to answer BEFORE they decided to endorse SOMER. So, if they still need time to think about it, they're doing it wrong. Well... CCP isn't a startup anymore, and you get diminishing returns as a company grows. Sometimes the right and left hands are moving independently. Affiliate programs are probably run by marketing, so I doubt many of the Devs are clued in to every aspect of what they are up to. I mean if your job is to make internet spaceship skins, why would you care or bother about how 3rd party sites are advertising? I mean outside of how your art is being displayed in a banner ad or something, why would you care? I sure wouldn't. So these different wings of CCP are probably trying to figure out, collectively, what is going on before they can even comment on anything. There will be meetings. There may be doughnuts at those meetings. Then an email will be sent. Then a follow up email asking if the first email was received. Then a confirmation email sent back that confirms receipt of the first email but without an answer to the question it contained. Then another one sent back asking that the question in the first email be addressed. Then a reply asking that the first email be resent because it was accidentally deleted...
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1438
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 18:44:00 -
[669] - Quote
I would suggest that CCP have read the player feedback on this issue and that they are formulating a response to past events and how they intend to proceed in the future.
It is better that they take their time and get it right, rather than posting something just for the sake of posting. This is not a signature. |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 18:54:00 -
[670] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I would suggest that CCP have read the player feedback on this issue and that they are formulating a response to past events and how they intend to proceed in the future.
It is better that they take their time and get it right, rather than posting something just for the sake of posting.
Well, at least they can post just what you are saying then... that they are formulating something and not ignoring this. |
|

Din Chao
392
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 19:41:00 -
[671] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Well... CCP isn't a startup anymore, and you get diminishing returns as a company grows. Sometimes the right and left hands are moving independently. Affiliate programs are probably run by marketing, so I doubt many of the Devs are clued in to every aspect of what they are up to. I mean if your job is to make internet spaceship skins, why would you care or bother about how 3rd party sites are advertising? I mean outside of how your art is being displayed in a banner ad or something, why would you care? I sure wouldn't. So these different wings of CCP are probably trying to figure out, collectively, what is going on before they can even comment on anything. There will be meetings. There may be doughnuts at those meetings. Then an email will be sent. Then a follow up email asking if the first email was received. Then a confirmation email sent back that confirms receipt of the first email but without an answer to the question it contained. Then another one sent back asking that the question in the first email be addressed. Then a reply asking that the first email be resent because it was accidentally deleted... Mmmmmm... doughnuts...
You're right. I work for one of the largest companies in the world and I've seen simple customer service emails go through 15 people before they get to the person that can take care of the problem. But I also know CCP, and if you don't keep up the hounding, they tend to drift. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1943
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 20:31:00 -
[672] - Quote
Considering that this is about policy, I'm really not surprised responses are slow. Creating policy, in any organisation over a handful of people, takes time.
In part because it's not just writing it. It's also the processes to manage that policy. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
61
|
Posted - 2013.10.14 23:30:00 -
[673] - Quote
You don't need policy, policy is for people who lack common sense and/or a decent understanding of the subject at hand. All you need is someone at CCP who understands EVE and its history to realise that CCP can't play footsie with any political or for profit entity within EVE. It's not difficult, you don't need rules and you don't need to have an IQ of 135 for it.
And if there's an "if in doubt" moment going on then CCP created a think tank a while back to help them with these "difficult" issues, it's called the CSM. I'm fairly sure the vast majority of current and past CSM members would within one second realise the possible "oops" this whole thign would turn in to, and suggest to CCP to refrain from these kinds of actions. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
106
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 00:19:00 -
[674] - Quote
keep their feet to the fire. we can't let them get away with this  |

Cameron Freerunner
Long Jump.
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 02:03:00 -
[675] - Quote
The wait continues.
Time keeps on slippin', slippin', slippin' into the Future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zT4Y-QNdto
Most likely outcome, they all Take the Money and Run: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0NKWpRO6g
|

StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 02:55:00 -
[676] - Quote
Welp, my account lapses in 24 hrs. If ccp responds after then - I won't be able to give any input.
Thanks for taking... coming on 1.5 weeks to respond to this fiasco ccp.
Hopefully there are plenty that will keep the pressure on about the blatant RMT and favoritism business because as it currently stands I won't be coming back. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
309
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 04:32:00 -
[677] - Quote
Funny someone pointed out the RMT thing a year ago and nothing was done:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=130803&p=2
I have cancelled every alt account over this. I am in a tough spot with my main because I have a corp full of people I have to think about. Trust me, if I did not, I'd be done with CCP tonight. I am fed up with CCP favoritism.
This is RMT, and SOMER should not be allowed to do it. The fact CCP would ignore it is shameful and we deserve an explanation and for this to be addressed once and for all. |

Shai 'Hulud
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 05:16:00 -
[678] - Quote
I'm just glad I never got around to ordering the new collector's edition 
Bad enough my accounts had all been paid up just a few days before CCP started "blowing" (see sig.)  All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
621
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 05:25:00 -
[679] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Considering that this is about policy, I'm really not surprised responses are slow. Creating policy, in any organisation over a handful of people, takes time.
In part because it's not just writing it. It's also the processes to manage that policy.
lack of communication was the root cause of the issue...
an update isn't too much to ask for.
"we're still working on it" takes 30 seconds to type and would go a long way with the community. we don't want them to rush an answer, we merely want to be informed of what is happening (if anything). Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
74
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 05:29:00 -
[680] - Quote
As the EveVegas 2013 event is on this weekend, I suspect that CCP will not respond to this issue until after the event.
Why? I suspect that CCP still wants to support and "cozy up" to Somer and maintain their relationship together.
CCP, if you actually do this, well this will look extremely bad for you.
CCP, for the sake of what little integrity you have left, you have to come to terms that your relationship with Somer is over. Cause, by disassociating yourself from Somer will be only a small but vital part to fixing this issue.
Somer is a scam. Somer deals in RMT. CCP needs to investigate and audit them. Somer being a means of financial revenue for CCP is over.
CCP, there are many questions from many concerned and upset customers. They all need to be addressed and responded to.
CCP, please provide us with a response on this issue before the weekend.
Thanks. Deka. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
314
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 05:31:00 -
[681] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I'm just glad I never got around to ordering the new collector's edition  Bad enough my accounts had all been paid up just a few days before CCP started "blowing" (see sig.) 
I bought the collector's edition. The USB hub will be good for something I guess. Or, maybe I can get enough for it on ebay to pay Chris Roberts for a "rear admiral" package.
If I am going to play a game with RMT'ing, might as well throw in with one that is as shamelessly blatant as Star Citizen.
As for your sig, I've updated a bit:
"All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box... full of %*#$."
(T-shirts anyone?) |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4398
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 07:19:00 -
[682] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:
I bought the collector's edition. The USB hub will be good for something I guess. Or, maybe I can get enough for it on ebay to pay Chris Roberts for a "rear admiral" package.
This is unlikely. I have got that read admiral package and had to shell out $275 to get it. It's unlikely you'll get so much with an hub thingie, expecially if you watch around and notice how EvE is despised everywhere (and thus it's collectibles). In SC there are whole threads about asking that the game WILL be different than EvE. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 08:44:00 -
[683] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:
I bought the collector's edition. The USB hub will be good for something I guess. Or, maybe I can get enough for it on ebay to pay Chris Roberts for a "rear admiral" package.
This is unlikely. I have got that read admiral package and had to shell out $275 to get it. It's unlikely you'll get so much with an hub thingie, expecially if you watch around and notice how EvE is despised everywhere (and thus it's collectibles). In SC there are whole threads about asking that the game WILL be different than EvE.
I can understand people with a bad taste from EVE. For some, it can become a second job; a job for which some sweat hard to pay for and ironically on which some others milk easy isk and (very possibly) cash... which brings us back to the topic of the thread. |

Rob Crowley
State War Academy
243
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 10:06:00 -
[684] - Quote
Maximilian Akora wrote:You don't need policy, policy is for people who lack common sense and/or a decent understanding of the subject at hand. All you need is someone at CCP who understands EVE and its history to realise that CCP can't play footsie with any political or for profit entity within EVE. It's not difficult, you don't need rules and you don't need to have an IQ of 135 for it. I can't really agree with you here. Common sense is a treacherous thing. Common sense might tell you that "rewarding players who contribute something extraordinary to the game" is a good thing. Because it certainly looks right and positive at first glance. Only when you think a bit more thoroughly about it you might find the inherent problems which can make it a negative thing.
And it's not enough to have "someone at CCP who understands", because I'm sure there are a bunch of people there who understand why it wasn't a good thing to do. Problem is: they were not involved. And policy making is exactly this, involving as many people with as many arguments as possible to come up with a well thought-out policy instead of relying on individual employee's common sense. Of course this process takes some time, but I'm willing to wait a bit in order to get it done properly.
That said, little updates are never a bad thing even if there's not much new to tell.
Quote:And if there's an "if in doubt" moment going on then CCP created a think tank a while back to help them with these "difficult" issues, it's called the CSM. I'm fairly sure the vast majority of current and past CSM members would within one second realise the possible "oops" this whole thing would turn in to, and suggest to CCP to refrain from these kinds of actions. Yeah, without a doubt CSM should've been consulted about this and should generally be consulted more often. I just have to point out that even some of the CSM members' common sense didn't tell them immediately that this incident was wrong. Some of them agreed it was wrong from the beginning, at least one of them listened to arguments and changed his opinion and AFAICS one of them still thinks everything done was alright. So even they might need some time and discussion sometimes to come up with the "right" common sense.  |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 10:39:00 -
[685] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285907&find=unread
My thread got Ignore-locked.
Apparently I am supposed to keep discussion in this thread, as if I might get an answer to my question?
CAN I COPY SOMERBLINK?
I want to sell ladybird credits for real life cash (like blink credits). The ladybird credits can be redeemed with me in game for ships.
I just wanted to ask CCP before doing this as I know RMT is bannable
PS: They seem to be ignoring and locking all threads that try to get to the bottom of why SOMERblink is being permitted to perpetuate a RMT business. How come? |

The Legendary Soldier
Interworld Venom
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 11:08:00 -
[686] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:
PS: They seem to be ignoring and locking all threads that try to get to the bottom of why SOMERblink is being permitted to perpetuate a RMT business. How come?
ROCK > CCP < HARDPLACE
or if you prefer...
DEVIL > CCP < DEEP BLUE SEA Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Rammix
TheMurk
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 11:44:00 -
[687] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:expecially if you watch around and notice how EvE is despised everywhere (and thus it's collectibles). In SC there are whole threads about asking that the game WILL be different than EvE. I think you're getting it wrong. Those who don't like eve either have different taste for games (like elf-fans, or spacecraft-FPS fans) or don't even have enough brains/patience to get past the tutorials and find their place to have fun: Eve has a relatively high barrier to entry, that's a known fact, and in my opinion it's a good thing.
Regarding spacecraft-FPS part, I'm waiting for the day when ccp connects Valkyrie to Eve (like piloted fighter drones etc), and for the day when they introduce WIS + ruined station exploration. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
317
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 11:51:00 -
[688] - Quote
First I agree that there needs to be a policy, as the mistake in the first place is to rely on "common sense". I work in the medical field, and we have risk management folks and institutional ethics folks who's very job is to approve of certain relationships with other organizations to be sure no conflicts of interest exist. Clearly CCP also needs someone to review these sorts of things from an ethical standpoint. That requires not only policy but a department of folks which they may or may not have. The CSM can HELP, but remember that 'popular' opinion may not always equate to 'ethically right' (such as CCP Guard's assertion that they were correct in what they did due to the popularity of SOMERblink).Ethical clarity does not, unfortunately, come naturally to some folks - and to be fair some issues can be complicated.
As for the rock and a hard place - this isn't so difficult. The fact is, that what comes hard in ethics is not necessarily deciding what is right, but simply doing what you decide. The answers here are easy - acting on them them is only hard if CCP feels intimidated by SOMERblink. But the fact is, they are RMT'ing and they should be dealt with the same as any other RMT group. CCP needs to remain "above the fray" or they cannot be trusted to properly adjudicate their own game. It isn't difficult, you just need to do it.
"Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences." - Midori Koto
"The moment you lose your honor, that's when your learn the hard way. Your choice, ALWAYS come back around." - CCP
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1443
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 12:20:00 -
[689] - Quote
'Common sense', how you just 'know' the world works when you are 18.
I think that the length of time CCP is taking to respond, is an indication that they are talking all the relevant issues very seriously.
Also, capital punishment is very popular with the masses in the UK, - it's common sense, innit? - this does not make it right. This is not a signature. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 12:56:00 -
[690] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I think that the length of time CCP is taking to respond, is an indication that they are talking all the relevant issues very seriously.
And I think they've decided to let this entire issue quietly die and never speak of it again, now that the post frequency about it has diminished. |
|

Frying Doom
2596
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 13:01:00 -
[691] - Quote
Look at the number of views, people are watching this thread.
I will admit if I was CCP, I would be looking for a scape goat. They screwed this one up badly. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Rammix
TheMurk
89
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 13:08:00 -
[692] - Quote
This thread is rolling down towards absurd and hysteria. I think it should be locked. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation The Cursed Few
106
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 13:54:00 -
[693] - Quote
Thought I would just post this here, since I think it's a valid theory that warrants an answer from CCP:
An in depth explanation as to why SOMER's sceme is deemed legal would be nice, CCP. I understand to confusion it brings to some. But the process is simply this:
1. You buy a GTC from party A (Markee Dragon). 2. Party A then pays a referral commission to party B (SOMER Blink). 3. Party B then gives you 200m in Blink Credit which can be used to play Blinks. 4. Unless you're absolutely stupid/unlucky you will will always win at least something. 5. You cash out the ISK to EVE Online.
You're indirectly giving SOMER Blink money so they can indirectly give you ISK. That's what it basically comes down to and it's probably those two indirectly's that make the entire thing legal.
The transaction between the player and Markee Dragon is legal. The transaction between Markee Dragon and SOMER is legal. The transaction between SOMER and the player is legal.
It's really quite an ingenious sceme that treads the boundaries of the EULA very narrowly. The odds of CCP making a complete 180 after all this and declaring this illegal are extremely low. It would mean CCP gave trillions upon trillions of ISK to an RMT sceme so it's very unlikely they will ever say this is illegal.
However, the thing I would like to know is how much Markee Dragon and the guys running SOMER are related to each other? Is SOMER really just using Markee as an affiliate or is there some deeper hidden agreement between them?
Given that Markee Dragon has a huge reputation for running RMT scemes for other MMO's and his name now AGAIN pops up with what is deemed to be an RMT sceme by many players, I wonder if CCP is fully aware of exactly how SOMER and Markee are connected. Some investigation into this is warranted if you ask me. Can CCP confirm, through cross checking IP and mail adresses, that Markee Dragon and SOMER are not actually the same person? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoavH8xbrPE |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
238
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 14:22:00 -
[694] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:First I agree that there needs to be a policy, as the mistake in the first place is to rely on "common sense". I work in the medical field, and we have risk management folks and institutional ethics folks who's very job is to approve of certain relationships with other organizations to be sure no conflicts of interest exist. Clearly CCP also needs someone to review these sorts of things from an ethical standpoint. That requires not only policy but a department of folks which they may or may not have. The CSM can HELP, but remember that 'popular' opinion may not always equate to 'ethically right' (such as CCP Guard's assertion that they were correct in what they did due to the popularity of SOMERblink).Ethical clarity does not, unfortunately, come naturally to some folks - and to be fair some issues can be complicated.
As for the rock and a hard place - this isn't so difficult. The fact is, that what comes hard in ethics is not necessarily deciding what is right, but simply doing what you decide. The answers here are easy - acting on them them is only hard if CCP feels intimidated by SOMERblink. But the fact is, they are RMT'ing and they should be dealt with the same as any other RMT group. CCP needs to remain "above the fray" or they cannot be trusted to properly adjudicate their own game. It isn't difficult, you just need to do it.
Reminds me of something I once heard:
"Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences." - Midori Koto
"The moment you lose your honor, that's when your learn the hard way. Your choice, ALWAYS come back around." - CCP
1. From your friend on the other side of the bench well said.
2. To all those who think this is going away or think this is being swept under the rug; Stay frosty it isn't. We hold the final vote here as players. I am willing to give CCP a very long rope, I just hop[e they know who to hang with it.
3. As a player base there is no connection between EVE VEGAS and Somer. At least there has been no connection established ny either party. The connection is thru CCP. EVE vegas is happening and Iam excited for it and hope it is an awsome time for all eve players. This issue is seperate from it in the sense CCP Community DEVPIMPED out Somer for more GTC sales knowing we would all buy them from him cause of the free 200 blink credits. This increase in GTC sales helped CCP probly pay for and justify sending people to vegas. What they didnt understand was they were destroying the sandbox and there crditbilty.
4. Conclusion: EVE players stay frosty the time to send your vote in is not at hand yet. Meetings are happening and I hope CCP finds the middle ground and a good solution that all of us can agree on and then continue moving forward. I have my list of solutions I would like to see and if I feel as paying customer CCP hasn't done the right thing I can vote, If they do the right thing then then DNSBlack will continue to business with this company.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4399
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 15:13:00 -
[695] - Quote
Rammix wrote: I think you're getting it wrong. Those who don't like eve either have different taste for games (like elf-fans, or spacecraft-FPS fans) or don't even have enough brains/patience to get past the tutorials and find their place to have fun: Eve has a relatively high barrier to entry, that's a known fact, and in my opinion it's a good thing.
Regarding spacecraft-FPS part, I'm waiting for the day when ccp connects Valkyrie to Eve (like piloted fighter drones etc), and for the day when they introduce WIS + ruined station exploration.
No, the guys posting in there are loudly asking that:
- there won't be capital ships (see EvE "have a supercaps hotdrop or don't undock" phenomenon).
- asshats are promptly banned.
- bigger blobs are not the mainstream way to win.
- there are more accurate physics mechanics
and a number of other points.
I don't see any difficulty at understanding / different taste of EvE or lack of braincells, they just want another game. A non EvE.
In my personal case I have always wanted to play more an X-Wing style than "clicky clicky submarines sub sim" I always loathed RNG => ECM crapola mechanics. I always despised a*holes having complete free reign, because "I will do you whatever abuse I want till the police comes to stop me" (which in EvE won't happen). I always found highly unrealistic to see huge fleets of ships that were meant to be super-rare, (by the lore) a show of power only 2-3 alliances could muster. I always found annoying that every free MMO allows people to dress / wear something unique but in EvE you can't even have a decal. Finally, I have always failed to understand why there's no consequences for actions. Whatever you do, you are always a disposable alt reroll away to a fresh restart. This makes impossible to elevate EvE to higher standards, to form beyond caveman infrastructures based on responsability and trust (with consequences). 10 years later and EvE still fails to have sandbox structures like player driven banks, financial markets (speaking of my sector), functioning stocks. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Kate stark
624
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:14:00 -
[696] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I think that the length of time CCP is taking to respond, is an indication that they are talking all the relevant issues very seriously.
alternatively it's a function of how little care is being given in iceland.
we've gone from guard posting frequently, to silence. "we're going to take this issue more seriously by ignoring it!"
hmm seems the filter isn't working today Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2694
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:42:00 -
[697] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I think that the length of time CCP is taking to respond, is an indication that they are talking all the relevant issues very seriously. alternatively it's a function of how little care is being given in iceland. we've gone from guard posting frequently, to silence. "we're going to take this issue more seriously by ignoring it!" hmm seems the filter isn't working today Rabble rabble rabble!
Who cares if we have to wait a week or two to get an answer? This has been going on for years! If they get the answer wrong... I don't know how people will react. Don't you want them to get it right?
Standing around yelling "rabble rabble rabble" isn't going to help anything.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Din Chao
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 16:52:00 -
[698] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I'm just glad I never got around to ordering the new collector's edition  Not so lucky. I'll use the hub, and I'm sure the book is cool. But I still feel like I got scammed by CCP in the long run... |

Kate stark
624
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 17:32:00 -
[699] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Kate stark wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:I think that the length of time CCP is taking to respond, is an indication that they are talking all the relevant issues very seriously. alternatively it's a function of how little care is being given in iceland. we've gone from guard posting frequently, to silence. "we're going to take this issue more seriously by ignoring it!" hmm seems the filter isn't working today Rabble rabble rabble! Who cares if we have to wait a week or two to get an answer? This has been going on for years! If they get the answer wrong... I don't know how people will react. Don't you want them to get it right? Standing around yelling "rabble rabble rabble" isn't going to help anything.
clearly you can't read. i'm not asking for an answer; i'm asking for an update. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2694
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 17:52:00 -
[700] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:clearly you can't read. i'm not asking for an answer; i'm asking for an update. Yes. I am totally illiterate. I cannot read or write. This deficiency is clear. Your analysis is sound.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |
|

Rammix
TheMurk
90
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 19:51:00 -
[701] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: No, the guys posting in there are loudly asking that:
- there won't be capital ships (see EvE "have a supercaps hotdrop or don't undock" phenomenon).
- asshats are promptly banned.
- bigger blobs are not the mainstream way to win.
- there are more accurate physics mechanics
- I don't see any difficulty at understanding / different taste of EvE or lack of braincells...
1 - Capital blobs are a realistic thing, so it's a right thing. If ccp removed such thing it would be a strongly artificial restriction and thus unrealistic.
2 - Those little girls who can't stand different types of scum (who's presence is realistic, again) should just find a game where they can go catching butterflies and happily hugging each other.
3 - Quantity always at some degree turns into quality. So one more time it's realistic when people win with amount of ships, and is also realistic and present in eve that there are ways to use smaller fleets with comparable effectiveness.
4 - With this I have to agree. But completely realistic physics would make the (relatively) hardcore game even more hardcore and fan-oriented.
5 - Oh, many people leave eve in their first days because "it's too complicated" or because they have to choose their path for themselves and nobody takes them by the hand to lead. There are plenty of such people. Those who stay - either follow their friends who are already in, or don't have a problem with "complexity" and variety of choices.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: In my personal case I have always wanted to play more an X-Wing style than "clicky clicky submarines sub sim"
Yeah, I, too, would love to be able to pilot small ships manually, cockpit style. Maybe some day we'll see that in eve. BTW, eve is not a spaceship simulator, more accurate definition IMO: it's a simulator of space society made of immortal people.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I always despised a*holes having complete free reign, because "I will do you whatever abuse I want till the police comes to stop me" (which in EvE won't happen).
If you don't like the social basis of eve - relative anarchy of immortal capsuleers - why do you play it?
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I always found highly unrealistic to see huge fleets of ships that were meant to be super-rare, (by the lore) a show of power only 2-3 alliances could muster.
I don't see a problem here. What couldn't be produced in big quantities a couple of years ago - now can be produced, it's just natural that amount of resources available to industry grows, as grows the industrial infrastructure itself. There are just more people gathering resources and more people playing tycoon-style game.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Finally, I have always failed to understand why there's no consequences for actions. Whatever you do, you are always a disposable alt reroll away to a fresh restart. This makes impossible to elevate EvE to higher standards, to form beyond caveman infrastructures based on responsability and trust (with consequences). 10 years later and EvE still fails to have sandbox structures like player driven banks, financial markets (speaking of my sector), functioning stocks.
You can't introduce law to a game unless you force ideology upon the players. First, there must be a state to make up and maintain law (which the banking system will stand upon). BTW, I personally would HATE banking system in Eve, because I hate it IRL - usury is a legitimized way for few people to be parasites on many. The only form of banking I wouldn't hate - with 0% credits based on fixed one-time fee for usage. I think there are not so many people who would like to pay to banks both IRL and ingame.
Second, capsuleers are so much superior to normal "citizens" socially and technologically, that they're effectively above any law of Empires. Thus, there could be a way to make capsuleer run states (factions), but it's very difficult to make such thing because it needs a very complex system to let players manually make some sort of constitution and codex of laws. In short, it's very very difficult for a game. There is a simple way - to force your own ideals of Justice upon player-run states, but such attitude absolutely wouldn't suite to Eve (I remind you that eve's community is multinational and multicultural). OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
4338

|
Posted - 2013.10.15 21:23:00 -
[702] - Quote
Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
77
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 22:29:00 -
[703] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:As the EveVegas 2013 event is on this weekend, I suspect that CCP will not respond to this issue until after the event.
Why? I suspect that CCP still wants to support and "cozy up" to Somer and maintain their relationship together.
CCP, if you actually do this, well this will look extremely bad for you.
CCP, for the sake of what little integrity you have left, you have to come to terms that your relationship with Somer is over. Cause, by disassociating yourself from Somer will be only a small but vital part to fixing this issue.
Somer is a scam. Somer deals in RMT. CCP needs to investigate and audit them. Somer being a means of financial revenue for CCP is over.
CCP, there are many questions from many concerned and upset customers. They all need to be addressed and responded to.
CCP, please provide us with a response on this issue before the weekend.
Thanks. Deka.
CCP Guard,
Thanks for the update.
So it seems you will respond to this issue after the Vegas event.
Do you really think this is a good idea? IMHO, I think this is the wrong move.
Please CCP, don't choose money over integrity. |

BigCountry
Specter Syndicate Tactical Narcotics Team
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 22:58:00 -
[704] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:As the EveVegas 2013 event is on this weekend, I suspect that CCP will not respond to this issue until after the event.
Why? I suspect that CCP still wants to support and "cozy up" to Somer and maintain their relationship together.
CCP, if you actually do this, well this will look extremely bad for you.
CCP, for the sake of what little integrity you have left, you have to come to terms that your relationship with Somer is over. Cause, by disassociating yourself from Somer will be only a small but vital part to fixing this issue.
Somer is a scam. Somer deals in RMT. CCP needs to investigate and audit them. Somer being a means of financial revenue for CCP is over.
CCP, there are many questions from many concerned and upset customers. They all need to be addressed and responded to.
CCP, please provide us with a response on this issue before the weekend.
Thanks. Deka. CCP Guard, Thanks for the update. So it seems you will respond to this issue after the Vegas event. Do you really think this is a good idea? IMHO, I think this is the wrong move. Please CCP, don't choose money over integrity.
You have no proof of any of your claims ... its all slander , and I dont think anyone doubts CCPs integrity just because they didnt specifically address your unsubstantiated claims...Stop being a hater and a cry baby ...
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
109
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 23:10:00 -
[705] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:...the pausing of rare in-game reward programs...
not good enough bro. no pause. that **** just needs to stop. straight up.
STOP |

Ra Jackson
the unified Negative Ten.
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 23:14:00 -
[706] - Quote
BigCountry wrote:You have no proof of any of your claims ... its all slander , and I dont think anyone doubts CCPs integrity just because they didnt specifically address your unsubstantiated claims...Stop being a hater and a cry baby ...
Hundreds of pages of doubts only in this very forum. Stop being ignorant. |

Gul Amarr
Orange County Cruisers
29
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 23:48:00 -
[707] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat.
So basically you're telling us that nobody will receive any rewards after you rewarded eves mafia twice in a row, doing injustice to their competitors (which is every evey eve player, be it a genuine one day old trial or 2003 vet), keeping the price of rewards artificially high.
At the same time, you're telling us you can't come up with a proper reply, because you're at a Mafia-sponsored meeting called "friends of the italian opera" in Vegas.
Yeah - my faith in CCP has been totally restored . |

StuckAtTheLock
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.15 23:52:00 -
[708] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat.
Are you kidding me?
The issue at hand is not only future events but the legitimacy of THIS event and you are not going to respond until AFTER the event?
full on **** on the customer's face. way to go |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
216
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 00:33:00 -
[709] - Quote
Thanks for the update CCP Guard.
I understand that it's not up to you to alone to formulate a policy and that you guys want to assess the situation before taking decisions regarding Somer Blink's use of isk tokens to reward GTC purchasers and the legetimacy (or lack of thereof) of other entities/players to engage in similar conduct in the game.
Looking forward to hear the verdict soonGäó. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
319
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:12:00 -
[710] - Quote
CCP is in a tough place because of the symbolism of the event. But we the players unfortunately at this point have to be patient. CCP, for their side - must realize that the longer this takes the more important they "get it right". Anything that comes across as CCP favoritism toward SOMER will be met with outrage and a loss of business.
To some of us, there was a breach of business ethics, it seems cut and dry and we would like to see that clearly admitted. Yet we also must understand the need proceed carefully when crafting policy. If you are looking for an admission of guilt, you may not get one as literal as you hope. That being said, a nuanced reader can see that CCP, at the very highest levels, 'gets it'.
David's mail to the CSM comes close to basically saying "yeah we messed this one up". Unfortunately, it was followed up by a bunch of comments from other devs that merely came across as excuses for why they picked SOMERblink. And ultimately they were excuses which highlighted the problem further, rather than admit or address it.
But this is why they need to take their time and why they need to avoid sending mixed messages. It is enough, in my mind, that we are no longer hearing empty explanations, and are being told "we're working on it". I have had the pleasure of meeting David Reid on a number of occasions actually, sharing stories of Ultima Online and the like. I have always been impressed by him and if he's involved in this - I am willing to wait for what he has to say.
And now, the attention on this issue has brought to light a whole new issue that apparently CCP either just missed or knowingly turned a blind eye to hoping the player base would miss it: the RMT side of SOMERblink.
Once again - this is a tough spot for CCP. We are talking about a near iconic establishment in our game world. Should its accounts be seized? Should all its isk be confiscated? It's easy to go down that slippery slope of saying "it doesn't do EVE any good to shut them down", and that may be true. But realize there are other lotteries out there - and within the game competition should be fair. When one of them RMT's and gets endorsements from the game creators - then the competition is no longer fair.
And it goes beyond the game. SOMER and therefore MarkeeDragon have basically been given, through CCP's ignorance or allowance of their activity, an unfair advantage over other GTC sellers/referrers. Is there a connection between the referral agent and the seller here? This is just one of many questions that need to be answered. How much ISK? How much cash? Did every smart individual at CCP who extolled the virtues of SOMERblink REALLY miss this, or was it allowed to happen intentionally? Once again - these are delicate questions and the answers take time.
I for one am willing to let CCP stew in this one. Not just so they "get it right", but also to let the magnitude of this seep in, so that they do not come down with an inadequate response. They must realize far better than we do that Star Citizen as well as other games are becoming a huge threat to EVE. They cannot afford these missteps any longer. The market is only going to get more competitive.
I mean look at Star Citizen alone. While their fundraising has brought in what only amounts to a third of CCP's revenues per year, it is for a game that does not even exist yet! And at its foundation is Chris Roberts and the backdrop of "Wing Commander" a game that has tremendous emotional leverage on many of us. Indeed it led many of us to playing EVE in the first place, as EVE became the "Wing Commander Online" we had so desperately hoped for. It enjoys a cult-like following comparable to EVE's, but once again - the game isn't even in alpha yet! And CCP has to compete against new games like that with 10 year old code, with a subscription based game in the era of 'free to play'. Tough job.
But yet - they've continued to hold our attention thus far. Why?
Because EVE is odd.
That's right. EVE is an oddity in the current environment of free to play and pay to win. Yet CCP must realize that that is its strength! It is because of that oddness that people are drawn to it. To walk the road of pay to win, to allow RMT'ers to turn isk making into a business, and to meddle in the economy with the injection of items of value is to deviate from that niche.
CCP's market for EVE is not that big. It's not even as big as the MMO market in general given a number of factors that cause some MMO'ers to select out of the pool from which CCP can draw. They cannot afford to alienate customers over this - any of them.
CCP's financial statements are available publically online, and if you take a look at them, in 2012 they made 5 million USD in profit.
What follows here might be voodoo math because of overhead and such, but 5 million USD amounts to just over 25,000 subscriptions. That is just 5% of their total subscriptions. Now I don't know squat about MMO's and so I have no idea if this is typical for the business, but it seems rather nerve wracking to know that if 5% of your customers vanish, you are no longer making any money. In other words - that even if you retain 95% of your customers, you are in trouble.
So in the end this is a whole lot of words the conclusion of which is just that this is a big deal for CCP. Let them treat it as such, and await their response. Be patient folks. |
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
443
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:29:00 -
[711] - Quote
At the highest levels, they "get it" like they got $1,000 "designer Japanese jeans".
 |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:35:00 -
[712] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:At the highest levels, they "get it" like they got $1,000 "designer Japanese jeans".  well, as the gentleman above us pointed out in the previous post, we still have an option to make sure they 'get it'... we're just being patient for the time being. |

Frying Doom
2598
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:39:00 -
[713] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:At the highest levels, they "get it" like they got $1,000 "designer Japanese jeans".  well, as the gentleman above us pointed out in the previous post, we still have an option to make sure they 'get it'... we're just being patient for the time being. I think time works against CCP on this one.
In a lot of situations if you give it enough time it just blows over, this seems like one of those time where if they take their time and get it wrong it will go off like a bomb. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
443
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:40:00 -
[714] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:At the highest levels, they "get it" like they got $1,000 "designer Japanese jeans".  well, as the gentleman above us pointed out in the previous post, we still have an option to make sure they 'get it'... we're just being patient for the time being.
I'm aware. It took thousands of people unsubscribing en masse before they understood that we weren't going to be **** on. And even then, they fired the community support team because of upper management's bullshit, and tried to play it off as if it was the players' fault! |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
111
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 03:53:00 -
[715] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:At the highest levels, they "get it" like they got $1,000 "designer Japanese jeans".  well, as the gentleman above us pointed out in the previous post, we still have an option to make sure they 'get it'... we're just being patient for the time being. I think time works against CCP on this one. In a lot of situations if you give it enough time it just blows over, this seems like one of those time where if they take their time and get it wrong it will go off like a bomb. i am extremely disappointed that CCP are going to do Eve Vegas without taking care of this first. i really am not surprised though. however, i am happy to see that the playerbase isn't just letting this slide. we need to keep the pressure on CCP for as long as it takes. aside from Somer's insider trading bit (which I likely would have done as well if put in that position), i can't fault them for anything, they are just doing what they do, which is making isk. however, CCP's response so far has been lackluster... even after the outrage in not 1, not 2, but multiple threads totaling over 100 pages of complaints, the best they could do is lock threads, reroute discussions, toss us lame excuses like 'the ships are only worth 30trit', and 'pause' their giveaways... it does seem as if they are hoping it dies down on it's own if ignored. clearly something isn't registering. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
446
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 04:14:00 -
[716] - Quote
To be fair, CCP's response to issues like this is generally to try to play it down, or to let it die off on its own. History has shown us that is how they operate, and it is up to the players not to let it happen. Monoclegate is the best example of this line of thinking: the only reason CCP got involved was because players wouldn't shut up. In fact, the first post on the issue started like this:
CCP Pann wrote:Some of you who have been around for a while may remember me. I was the original community manager for EVE. These days, I oversee the PR and Community teams. While most of what I do happens behind the curtains, I am still aware of whatGÇÖs going on front and center. I would be lying if I said that whatGÇÖs happening now didnGÇÖt make me sad, but IGÇÖm not here to ask for your sympathy. To be perfectly honest, IGÇÖm here to buy time while we try to sort things out. No sense in lying about it so IGÇÖll call a spade a spade.
"Buying time" until they could get the bullshit going and get us to shut up. What followed was the banning of several high-profile members of the "resistance", people being told they shouldn't post, etc. In the end, CCP Pann and the PR team was fired en masse because the players had spoken. CCP Pann was thrown under the bus, and Hilmar tried to pin the blame for the firings on the players.
I'd like to see things change, but unfortunately I don't think that is going to happen this time. I am not saying this is as big as Monoclegate, or T20, but it's definitely an issue of trust in CCP. They started to get it back, and then it was ripped away. That's the problems with secrecy. |

Kate stark
629
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 05:30:00 -
[717] - Quote
ask and ye shall receive.
nice. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2695
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 06:04:00 -
[718] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:#WALL OF TEXT# And every word worth reading. This. All of it. ^
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Frying Doom
2599
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 06:48:00 -
[719] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat. While we are waiting (and frankly I think that the winter summit is way to far away) could we at least know how many of these scorpions were kept by the Somer staff and how many were sold to other players? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 07:56:00 -
[720] - Quote
CCP,
You will be hurting yourself and doing yourself an extreme disservice if you are seen :
- supporting - vouching - associating - endorsing - continue to 'white knight" - "cozying up" with
Somer during the Vegas event.
- Is Somer a subsidiary business of CCP? ( Yes, it's time for the "Conspiracy Theory" questions ) - How many working days do you really need to formulate a response to this issue? ( You don't seem to have made it a prority to do so ).
By not showing any urgency to resolve this issue before the Vegas event, well, I don't think that's a good idea.
Is CCP really going to follow the motto, "Greed Is Good"? ( Is Gordan Gecko CCP's new CFO? )
Come on guys, please fix this issue before Vegas. For the sake of what little integrity you have left, please fix this issue.
Somer is a player run gambling site, which I believe is a scam, and IMO is involved in RMT. CCP should stop associating with them and investigate / audit their activities. As such, CCP, has to come to terms that they have to loose having Somer as a means of financial revenue, for the sake of saving its reputation.
CCP, please don't choose money over integrity.
Please, I'm tired of the designer jeans and monocles. |
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 09:57:00 -
[721] - Quote
Why does CCP act like this is such a difficult situation to analyse, like its really hard to balance up the rights and wrongs of it.
IT IS EASY. All I presonally want is the following:
1) CCP to implement an 'Above the Fray' rule. This means they will never take sides with in game entities again. They will only intervene in the game where the EULA is being broken.
2) CCP item spawning (AKA game meddling) to be immediately limited to:
- Valid reimbursment cases
- AT (and similar CCP run tournament) prizes
- Seasonal gifts (must be gifted to all)
the above is comprehensive
3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately
4) All promotion and support for SOMERblink to cease (in keeping with the Above the Fray principle). I also would like a sober and simply worded announcement that SOMERblink is able to scam, might be scamming, and can scam in the future.
5) SOMERblink to be ordered to cease its RMT business. I want each SOMERblink account to receive a 1 week suspension and a fine applied to the founder in isk, equal to half of the total isk paid out under the RMT scheme (this is very lenient, and fair as CCP is partly to blame for not apprehending SOMER earlier, he probably thought what he was doing was ok).
TOO GREEDY? |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation The Cursed Few
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 09:58:00 -
[722] - Quote
Gul Amarr wrote:CCP Guard wrote: A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat.
So basically you're telling us that nobody will receive any rewards after you rewarded eves mafia twice in a row, doing injustice to their competitors (which is every evey eve player, be it a genuine one day old trial or 2003 vet), keeping the price of rewards artificially high. At the same time, you're telling us you can't come up with a proper reply, because you're at a Mafia-sponsored meeting called "friends of the italian opera" in Vegas. Yeah - my faith in CCP has been totally restored  .
You really need to get that broomstick out of your rear end, dude. Mafia? Really? Every single person who ever deposited money to SOMER did so out of their own free will. Don't for a second pretend that they are forcing people to give them money.
This is still a GAME. The ISK involved is virtual and doesn't even exist. The event in Vegas is a real event that is paid with real money by real people by many more than just SOMER. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UoavH8xbrPE |

Frying Doom
2600
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 10:06:00 -
[723] - Quote
The other thing that this has shown is how lop sided these give always have been.
Listening to Crossing Zebras, they receive 1 free account and where given 2 free tickets to fan fest(entry tickets not airplane or room costs ect..).
Now Crossing Zebras is a great site, look at what Xander went through to try and interview all of the CSM candidates but they apparently deserve of almost nothing, plus all of the other great community sites that are given little or nothing.
But a gambling site gets showered in hundreds of billions of isk and they are a for profit site that sponsors community events because it is good advertising. In RL Alcohol, tobacco, gambling sites and even oil companies support community events and sports, they do it for advertising and so it makes them look good or does CCP believe that tobacco companies supported formula one for so many years because they were such great guys interested in the sport and not in increasing their sales.
CCP really has this ass about, personally I like Somer blink but they are not a community site, they are there for profit both RL and in game. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
50
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 10:13:00 -
[724] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:...does CCP believe that tobacco companies supported formula one for so many years because they were such great guys interested in the sport and not in increasing their sales.
Excellent put. This captures my thinking exactly.
|

RAIN Arthie
The Ascended Fleet Intrepid Crossing
135
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 11:34:00 -
[725] - Quote
In my honest opinion, I belive we all contribute to this sandbox which is EVE ONLINE. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
52
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 11:49:00 -
[726] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:... 3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately ... I understand the sentiment behind trying to "put things right" but this may be like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube. Some (most?) of the ships were sold on, in some cases multiple times. And however much blame rests with CCP or Somerset Mahm, it is unlikely that most of the 30 recipients were guilty of anything other than circumstance. I really can't think of a completely satisfactory remedy.
Which brings me to my real point. Assuming you are a player who cares about SOMERgate (some apparently don't), and are waiting to see what is done about it before quitting EVE (some didn't), are you willing to give CCP a realistic way out? Or would you rather put them in a no-win situation?
Obviously no corrective action will make everyone happy, and there are some demands which are too extreme for CCP to accept. I'm sure in time CCP will do something, but how much (or how little) is really enough?
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 12:04:00 -
[727] - Quote
Careby wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:... 3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately ... I understand the sentiment behind trying to "put things right" but this may be like trying to put the toothpaste back in the tube. Some (most?) of the ships were sold on, in some cases multiple times. And however much blame rests with CCP or Somerset Mahm, it is unlikely that most of the 30 recipients were guilty of anything other than circumstance. I really can't think of a completely satisfactory remedy. Which brings me to my real point. Assuming you are a player who cares about SOMERgate (some apparently don't), and are waiting to see what is done about it before quitting EVE (some didn't), are you willing to give CCP a realistic way out? Or would you rather put them in a no-win situation? Obviously no corrective action will make everyone happy, and there are some demands which are too extreme for CCP to accept. I'm sure in time CCP will do something, but how much (or how little) is really enough?
In honesty I dont really want an apology, or for SOMER to be punished.
Just needs to be sorted and not happen again.
Then again I am genuinely probably going to stop playing eve. There are far too many other games out there without all this rubbish associated with them. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
218
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:16:00 -
[728] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Why does CCP act like this is such a difficult situation to analyse, like its really hard to balance up the rights and wrongs of it. IT IS EASY. All I presonally want is the following:1) CCP to implement an ' Above the Fray' rule. This means they will never take sides with in game entities again. They will only intervene in the game where the EULA is being broken. 2) CCP item spawning (AKA game meddling) to be immediately limited to:
- Valid reimbursment cases
- AT (and similar CCP run tournament) prizes
- Seasonal gifts (must be gifted to all)
the above list is comprehensive3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately 4) All promotion and support for SOMERblink to cease (in keeping with the Above the Fray principle). I also would like a sober and simply worded announcement that SOMERblink is able to scam, might be scamming, and can scam in the future. 5) SOMERblink to be ordered to cease its RMT business. I want each SOMERblink account to receive a 1 week suspension and a fine applied to the founder in isk, equal to half of the total isk paid out under the RMT scheme (this is very lenient, and fair as CCP is partly to blame for not apprehending SOMER earlier, he probably thought what he was doing was ok). TOO GREEDY?
Miss Ladybird's suggestion for resolution of the issue seems appropriate, in case CCP's verdict deems Somer Blink's actions illegitimate and forbids other entities/players to engage in similar conduct.
Action number 3), as Careby observed, may be nonetheless impossible to execute without affecting/reimbursing foreign players who might have already bought those ships.
Regarding point 5) it is my opinion that 1 week suspension would be too lenient as punishment for a RMT offense, as that kind of suspension is normally what CCP apllies to simple misconducts like player verbal abuse offenses. Furthermore I agree that not only Somer Blink is to be held accountable for carrying on with the misconduct, but a fact finding process should also be conducted by CCP's internal affairs department to investigate the alleged involvement of CCP employees with Somer Blink. Neglecting the enforcement of the game's EULA rules of conduct (if that turns out to be the case) and even supporting and advertising the fraudulent scheme are unnacceptable actions that should not remain unpunished, in the same way that other similar actions performed by other CCP employees in the past were not.
This is however one of the possible outcome scenarios for CCP. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4400
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:18:00 -
[729] - Quote
Rammix wrote: 1 - Capital blobs are a realistic thing, so it's a right thing. If ccp removed such thing it would be a strongly artificial restriction and thus unrealistic.
2 - Those little girls who can't stand different types of scum (who's presence is realistic, again) should just find a game where they can go catching butterflies and happily hugging each other.
3 - Quantity always at some degree turns into quality. So one more time it's realistic when people win with amount of ships, and is also realistic and present in eve that there are ways to use smaller fleets with comparable effectiveness.
4 - With this I have to agree. But completely realistic physics would make the (relatively) hardcore game even more hardcore and fan-oriented.
5 - Oh, many people leave eve in their first days because "it's too complicated" or because they have to choose their path for themselves and nobody takes them by the hand to lead. There are plenty of such people. Those who stay - either follow their friends who are already in, or don't have a problem with "complexity" and variety of choices.
1 - Capital blobs are a realistic result of ultra-massive RMT brought to the extreme. Stop pretending it's because of legit effort, this very thread shows the situation, the (too) smart players and a company that closes one eye including vs null sec RMT corps.
2 - What do those types of scum add to the game? It's like going to old Bronx and saying: "all those dog piles help keeping the awesome ambience!"
3 - See point 1. I want to see the same guys happily losing 47B worth of capital ships (just to talk about a recent battle) without blinking, without support from RMT ISK.
4 - It's unlikely SC will have realistic physics. But it'll implement enough to not appear to be a double clicks driven submarine sim. When playing skilled of course, for all the others there's Masterca... ehm Orbit at nn meters.
5 - It certainly does not apply to SC "EvE dissenters". SC is going to be identically "open ended", in fact it's close to EvE's basic principles enough, for a lot of EvE players to watch it closely.
Rammix wrote: If you don't like the social basis of eve - relative anarchy of immortal capsuleers - why do you play it?
*I* don't mind. In fact I am still here. Others seem to mind, maybe because sitting with utter a*holes does not immediately feel like it's a big value addition to the game.
Rammix wrote: I don't see a problem here. What couldn't be produced in big quantities a couple of years ago - now can be produced, it's just natural that amount of resources available to industry grows, as grows the industrial infrastructure itself. There are just more people gathering resources and more people playing tycoon-style game.
What did not exist years ago was PLEX (officially supported RMT). PLEX is a perfect ISK exchange machine (aka wallet segregation breaker or ISK velocity increaser) that lets heavy ISK faucets grinders meet heavy ISK consumers (null sec alliances). Too often the ISK faucet grinders are botters and RMTers. The can buy thousands of PLEXes with dirty ISK and launder it as they place them for sale at convenient prices.
Rammix wrote: You can't introduce law to a game unless you force ideology upon the players. First, there must be a state to make up and maintain law (which the banking system will stand upon).
It's a sandbox game, meant to provide us tools to plan and draw our own life plots. If I want to become a trusted service I should be allowed access to *opt in* tools to certify the goodwill. That is self imposed policies and restrictions. A personal choice that lets other people think: "that guy gave up on impunity, he has to behave, we can trust his services".
Now, I personally don't have many issues, if you check the MD forum you will see I got even > 100B ISK just on my word but the game can't be designed around me, Chribba, Grendell and an handful others. Self imposed, opted in trustworthiness should be just another of the plethora of tools this game makes available to us.
Rammix wrote: BTW, I personally would HATE banking system in Eve, because I hate it IRL - usury is a legitimized way for few people to be parasites on many. The only form of banking I wouldn't hate - with 0% credits based on fixed one-time fee for usage. I think there are not so many people who would like to pay to banks both IRL and ingame.
You would hate it but we had highly popular banks so the topic is popular. Also I find it peculiar to call "parasite" somebody who has to manually process ALL the withdrawal tellering process, person by person, transaction by transaction, and also pay interests to the account holders on top of it. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
330
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:50:00 -
[730] - Quote
I agree this is something to which the solution seems quite easy, but I also think it's a big deal to CCP and therefore they want to make sure all parties are consulted properly.
The more I chew this issue over, the more frustrated I get - I admit that.
When CCP tried to sell 'gold ammo' through the Aurum store, there was an outrage and they 'responded'. They were reportedly recalcitrant and responsive.
But now, what it looks like, at the very least is that they found a way to run a proxy Aurum store, one that players fell for hook, line and sinker. CCP gives items to SOMER, who then raffles them off. Every raffle ticket bought with "Somer isk" is cash dollars for CCP, MarkeeDragon, and SOMERblink. For those of you who have been SOMER supporters - you have been participating in a giant Aurum style gold ammo store, supported by RMT'ing and endorsed by CCP. You've been feeding CCP, SOMER and MarkeeDragon your hard earned money, not for gold ammo or isk, but for merely a CHANCE at winning gold ammo or isk.
We need full disclosure on this issue. Was there some sort of collusion between Markee, SOMER and CCP to make cash for all of them while auctioning off rare ships that were gifted to SOMER by CCP under the guise of "EVE Vegas"?
Perhaps it is more likely CCP just didn't realize what they were getting themselves into - but this is the problem with doing business with in game and out of game entities, it creates at least the perception of deal making. I'd personally would like to know how many GTC's have been sold through SOMER and Markee since SOMER began offering them.
We should keep demanding answers, but I understand, given the fact that CCP may very well have been participating in a giant AURUM store style cash making scheme - the need for time.
|
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 13:52:00 -
[731] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Miss Ladybird wrote:Why does CCP act like this is such a difficult situation to analyse, like its really hard to balance up the rights and wrongs of it. IT IS EASY. All I presonally want is the following:1) CCP to implement an ' Above the Fray' rule. This means they will never take sides with in game entities again. They will only intervene in the game where the EULA is being broken. 2) CCP item spawning (AKA game meddling) to be immediately limited to:
- Valid reimbursment cases
- AT (and similar CCP run tournament) prizes
- Seasonal gifts (must be gifted to all)
the above list is comprehensive3) All of SOMERblink's iScorps to be taken back and destroyed immediately 4) All promotion and support for SOMERblink to cease (in keeping with the Above the Fray principle). I also would like a sober and simply worded announcement that SOMERblink is able to scam, might be scamming, and can scam in the future. 5) SOMERblink to be ordered to cease its RMT business. I want each SOMERblink account to receive a 1 week suspension and a fine applied to the founder in isk, equal to half of the total isk paid out under the RMT scheme (this is very lenient, and fair as CCP is partly to blame for not apprehending SOMER earlier, he probably thought what he was doing was ok). TOO GREEDY? Miss Ladybird's suggestion for resolution of the issue seems appropriate, in case CCP's verdict deems Somer Blink's actions illegitimate and forbids other entities/players to engage in similar conduct. Action number 3), as Careby observed, may be nonetheless impossible to execute without affecting/reimbursing foreign players who might have already bought those ships. Regarding point 5) it is my opinion that 1 week suspension would be too lenient as punishment for a RMT offense, as that kind of suspension is normally what CCP apllies to simple misconducts like player verbal abuse offenses. Furthermore I agree that not only Somer Blink is to be held accountable for carrying on with the misconduct, but a fact finding process should also be conducted by CCP's internal affairs department to investigate the alleged involvement of CCP employees with Somer Blink. Neglecting the enforcement of the game's EULA rules of conduct (if that turns out to be the case) and even supporting and advertising the fraudulent scheme are unnacceptable actions that should not remain unpunished, in the same way that other similar actions performed by other CCP employees in the past did not. This is however one of the possible outcome scenarios for CCP.
I think what you are saying is " resolution with out restitution is meanless". There is now moving forward until the sandbox is restored and ccp integrity is made whole again. I sit and countinue to give them as much rope as the need. They have at least earned that. Now that ccp has added the eve vegas log to the fire the restitution price is going up.
I would be curious to see how many people following this thread also feel this way. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
330
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 14:02:00 -
[732] - Quote
The real penalty for SOMER should be players no longer patronizing them.
They are only successful because the player base gives them a pass.
No mistake:
They are not only an RMT entity, but they are an RMT entity working alongside CCP and MarkeeDragon to make cash off of EVE. Whether or not it is intentional is secondary - if you patronize SOMERblink you are helping to pay CCP and MarkeeDragon.
If you were outraged by monoclegate and gold ammo then you should be doubly outraged by this as it is the SAME THING, only this time it is sneaky. Even if CCP was not intentionally using SOMER as a proxy for their vision of the AURUM store, they were doing so through complacency. Replace AURUM with SOMERisk and gold ammo with SOE ships, trips to Iceland, ISW Scorps, and you have the very thing we feared, the very thing we protested against, and the very thing CCP told us they were NOT GOING TO DO.
So if you want to continue to support SOMER in spite of them being an RMT, cash making scheme for themselves, MarkeeDragon and CCP - go right ahead, but personally I suggest players boycott SOMER completely. That way one week suspension or not, they are put out of business. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
240
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 14:29:00 -
[733] - Quote
CCP have a fun trip to Vegas. Iam sure you have made enough money off somer GTC sales to have a really great time. Don't worry about us paying subscribers feel betrayed, we will be here when you get back waiting by the forum door to hear your response. I guess our 15 dollars are not that important when compared to getting people hooked on gambling and selling eve stuff thru somer. The longer you wait the larger the army grows and what I find amazing you don't really see the problem yet. I was told that my support would bomrang on me but slowly it is growing and after the last response it is even getting larger.
DNSBlack |

Shai 'Hulud
74
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 15:41:00 -
[734] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company. You have now admitted to being aware of the EULA violations with SOMER's operations. If the clock wasn't ticking before, it certainly is now. Every transaction they make money on between now and when you make a decision is officially on you, not them. I wonder how much time other RMT operations are allowed to run AFTER CCP is aware of them?...
P.S. - I don't actually believe CCP didn't know about this before, but now they have admitted such. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 15:55:00 -
[735] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company. You have now admitted to being aware of the EULA violations with SOMER's operations. If the clock wasn't ticking before, it certainly is now. Every transaction they make money on between now and when you make a decision is officially on you, not them. I wonder how much time other RMT operations are allowed to run AFTER CCP is aware of them?... P.S. - I don't actually believe CCP didn't know about this before, but now they have admitted such.
The "thing to do" would be to shut down SOMER's RMT'ing (the 200m isk per GTC purchase) PENDING the completion of the investigation.
The fact that SOMERblink is an RMT scheme as well as a form of micro transaction economy is a big deal - and does require some time to investigate I would imagine.
I would assume they are looking at how much isk has been sold, as well as any connections, if any, between devs, SOMER and MarkeeDragon. The "who knew what?" of this, if you will. So once again - patience is important. For CCP's side of it, they need to make sure that if we are going to be kept waiting, we get some solid answers.
In the meantime, I have to wonder why they haven't given SOMERblink some monocles to auction off... |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
244
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:07:00 -
[736] - Quote
Somer if I were u I would run some blink credit specials during eve Vegas. Buy 2 GTC get 1 billion blink credits.
WHY DO YOU ASK.
Well if CCP rules in your favor then you will have a stream of GTC sellers cashing in on your Market. I can't wait to by GTC from the goon site and get goon credits. I know they will have some special deal about owning a system in game for goon credits woot.
If CCP rules against you then you can cash in while they are vacation in Vegas. You need to move as many GTC as you can while your paid off CCP employees are still working for the company. Also make sure you move all your isk out to friends and alts so they can't take that away from you.
The fall out from this will grow if it isn't handled before Vegas CCP. I guess this is what happens when you spend thousands of dollar to form a consumer advocacy group and don't use them. I wonder if there was this much thought and process done before CCP community decided to use somer. According to the CSM minutes of old and talking to current and past CSM members I would have to say NOPE. I hope you are beginning to see there is a bigger crisis then you think.
Hey and since you look the other way for somer and ignored your own Eula. I am calling for every account that got band for buying isk to be restored and all of there wallets to be returned to their original amounts. See how your EULA no longer applies and we are managing by the seat of our pants.
|

Shai 'Hulud
74
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:08:00 -
[737] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company. You have now admitted to being aware of the EULA violations with SOMER's operations. If the clock wasn't ticking before, it certainly is now. Every transaction they make money on between now and when you make a decision is officially on you, not them. I wonder how much time other RMT operations are allowed to run AFTER CCP is aware of them?... P.S. - I don't actually believe CCP didn't know about this before, but now they have admitted such. The "thing to do" would be to shut down SOMER's RMT'ing (the 200m isk per GTC purchase) PENDING the completion of the investigation. The fact that SOMERblink is an RMT scheme as well as a form of micro transaction economy is a big deal - and does require some time to investigate I would imagine. I would assume they are looking at how much isk has been sold, as well as any connections, if any, between devs, SOMER and MarkeeDragon. The "who knew what?" of this, if you will. So once again - patience is important. For CCP's side of it, they need to make sure that if we are going to be kept waiting, we get some solid answers. In the meantime, I have to wonder why they haven't given SOMERblink some monocles to auction off... I agree with patience, selectively. At this time this is not something to debate. SOMER is clearly in violation of the current EULA, and I don't think they need to have a discussion on whether rule breaking should be allowed (again, they have now admitted to being aware of the issue here). All they have to do is enforce their current rules.
If they want to have a discussion about the validity of those rules, and potential changes they would like to make to them going forward, then that is fine. But that should be done after they have enforced their current rules.
In the end this is just another form of special treatment for SOMER. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
336
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:13:00 -
[738] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company. You have now admitted to being aware of the EULA violations with SOMER's operations. If the clock wasn't ticking before, it certainly is now. Every transaction they make money on between now and when you make a decision is officially on you, not them. I wonder how much time other RMT operations are allowed to run AFTER CCP is aware of them?... P.S. - I don't actually believe CCP didn't know about this before, but now they have admitted such. The "thing to do" would be to shut down SOMER's RMT'ing (the 200m isk per GTC purchase) PENDING the completion of the investigation. The fact that SOMERblink is an RMT scheme as well as a form of micro transaction economy is a big deal - and does require some time to investigate I would imagine. I would assume they are looking at how much isk has been sold, as well as any connections, if any, between devs, SOMER and MarkeeDragon. The "who knew what?" of this, if you will. So once again - patience is important. For CCP's side of it, they need to make sure that if we are going to be kept waiting, we get some solid answers. In the meantime, I have to wonder why they haven't given SOMERblink some monocles to auction off... I agree with patience, selectively. At this time this is not something to debate. SOMER is clearly in violation of the current EULA, and I don't think they need to have a discussion on whether rule breaking should be allowed (again, they have now admitted to being aware of the issue here). All they have to do is enforce their current rules. If they want to have a discussion about the validity of those rules, and potential changes they would like to make to them going forward, then that is fine. But that should be done after they have enforced their current rules. In the end this is just another form of special treatment for SOMER.
Well I would hope SOMER would get the same treatment as any other RMT entity.
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
116
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:30:00 -
[739] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: In the meantime, I have to wonder why they haven't given SOMERblink some monocles to auction off...
they did, it just keeps slipping through the cracks. they received 4 rare monocles iirc. so, they have been the recipient of not 1, not 2, but at least 3 rewards so far. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3129
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:31:00 -
[740] - Quote
A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:31:00 -
[741] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company. You have now admitted to being aware of the EULA violations with SOMER's operations. If the clock wasn't ticking before, it certainly is now. Every transaction they make money on between now and when you make a decision is officially on you, not them. I wonder how much time other RMT operations are allowed to run AFTER CCP is aware of them?... P.S. - I don't actually believe CCP didn't know about this before, but now they have admitted such. The "thing to do" would be to shut down SOMER's RMT'ing (the 200m isk per GTC purchase) PENDING the completion of the investigation. The fact that SOMERblink is an RMT scheme as well as a form of micro transaction economy is a big deal - and does require some time to investigate I would imagine. I would assume they are looking at how much isk has been sold, as well as any connections, if any, between devs, SOMER and MarkeeDragon. The "who knew what?" of this, if you will. So once again - patience is important. For CCP's side of it, they need to make sure that if we are going to be kept waiting, we get some solid answers. In the meantime, I have to wonder why they haven't given SOMERblink some monocles to auction off... I agree with patience, selectively. At this time this is not something to debate. SOMER is clearly in violation of the current EULA, and I don't think they need to have a discussion on whether rule breaking should be allowed (again, they have now admitted to being aware of the issue here). All they have to do is enforce their current rules. If they want to have a discussion about the validity of those rules, and potential changes they would like to make to them going forward, then that is fine. But that should be done after they have enforced their current rules. In the end this is just another form of special treatment for SOMER. Well I would hope SOMER would get the same treatment as any other RMT entity. Anything else might kill CCP and EVE. Although I will admit that the manner in which they are conducting this RMT and micro transaction scheme is a bit complicated and people have had a tendency to overlook it. If CCP started selling IW Scorps and SOE ships in the Aurum store the game would sink in a week. But sell them through SOMERblink and it slips in under everyone's nose.
The reason it slipped under everyones nose is SOMER bought off the entire community LOL all those who burnt JITA are now being paid off. Somer = EDEN OPEN, Funding RVB, Selling gear some players could never get in game, Funding my enemies, Blah Blah Blah.
But argus I love the game, But argus they do so much for the community, But argus they Blah blah balh. Somer has bought the entire community and wreck the sand box. How can I make that statement well it is simple.
CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
HEY CCP IAM THIS= relevant stakeholders in the company. Who hasnt been bought
BUT AFTER YOUR ACTIONS i FEEL MORE LIKE THIS= Irrelevant stakeholders in the company who you dont give 2 PPHHucks about. By all means have a grand old time in Vegas. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
118
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:34:00 -
[742] - Quote
i do find it pretty hilarious that CCP just basically admitted that Somer is RMTing... but they need to discuss it with 'relevant stakeholders' before they can do anything to punish their cashcow for behaviors that others would get banned over in the blink of an eye (no pun intended)... because ofc it's about the $$$ from the GTC sales.... it always was. we aren't stupid. CCP.  |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
118
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:36:00 -
[743] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote: CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
HEY CCP IAM THIS= relevant stakeholders in the company. Who hasnt been bought
BUT AFTER YOUR ACTIONS i FEEL MORE LIKE THIS= Irrelevant stakeholders in the company who you dont give 2 PPHHucks about. By all means have a grand old time in Vegas.
NEQ
that response from CCP Guard really just pissed me off. we need to run it by 'relevant stakeholders'?!?!
WHAT THE **** ARE YOUR CUSTOMERS? |

Two step
Aperture Harmonics No Holes Barred
4239
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:37:00 -
[744] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
I'd like to see questions about contests that are open to everyone, contests that require some sort of simple registration, facebook like/tweet, or that require ISK deposits. I see those 4 cases rather differently. CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
247
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:50:00 -
[745] - Quote
Two step wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
I'd like to see questions about contests that are open to everyone, contests that require some sort of simple registration, facebook like/tweet, or that require ISK deposits. I see those 4 cases rather differently.
Enforce your current EULA as it stands now. Then I will take your stupid survey. Once again CCP, community bought and paid for by Somer
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
247
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:54:00 -
[746] - Quote
Here I will fill out my survey for you. 3 accounts have now been un subbed. As a stakeholder I am beginning to cast my vote. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
118
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:56:00 -
[747] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:
Enforce your current EULA as it stands now. Then I will take your stupid survey. Once again CCP, community bought and paid for by Somer
but Somer isn't like everyone else... any other RMTer would be gone already. CCP needs to run this by their 'relevant stakeholders' first, they wouldn't want to jeopardize their 'special relationship' with Somer afterall 
pathetic response really... we 'might' do something about Somer's questionable RMT-type practices, but we can't do it until AFTER Eve Vegas and talking to our corporate overlords... actually, we'll just get around to it at the Winter Summit... maybe.
i have a feeling they'll just condone Somer's practices in the end, and perhaps even amend the EULA in such a way that what Somer does is made fully legal  |

Spaja Saist
Void Engineers Permanent Transience
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 16:58:00 -
[748] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
This is CCP and CSM's answer to all this issues being raised? You have got to be kidding me. None of this addresses the issue of CCP not following their own EULA and allowing an RMT site to continue to operate as well as showering gifts on them. This reeks of CSM being in collusion with CCP and helping them to whitewash the whole incident. If you have to ask the community what it considers acceptable or not you have no business being on the CSM.
I just recently came back after a long absence because of Monoclegate and I see CCP has learned nothing from that fiasco. When I think where this game would be if CCP would quit shooting themselves in the foot it just pisses me off more.
I'm cancelling my subscription once again until CCP stops pulling this crap. Consider that my answer to your stupid survey. |

Ali Aras
Valkyries of Night Of Sound Mind
412
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:00:00 -
[749] - Quote
Two step wrote: I'd like to see questions about contests that are open to everyone, contests that require some sort of simple registration, facebook like/tweet, or that require ISK deposits. I see those 4 cases rather differently.
Good point, I'll add those. http://warp-to-sun.tumblr.com -- my blog |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
248
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:05:00 -
[750] - Quote
At best the entire community has been bought off by somer and your market survey group is scewed. Stop the political crap.
Somer here is an idea by a GTC from me get 500 mil blink credits and then fill out this survey and tell CCP what I nice guy Iam.
LoL seriously you guys are amazing |
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
250
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:19:00 -
[751] - Quote
If Iam making money off RMTing don't you think I will do everything in my power to keep this thing rolling. Somer is a real money making operation they have found away to exploit CCP and the gaming community of eve. Finding out we're grey areas are and the like will just lead to some one testing the next EULA and so on and so on. The EULA and tos are in place and somer has broken them period and if CCP doesn't think so then Iam sorry I no longer want to pay company my gaming dollars who are arbitrary in enforcing there contract they had me agree to.
First knot in the rope has been tied |

Nocturnal Phantom
TunDraGon
25
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:26:00 -
[752] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. That argument I would agree with in regards to certain rare items, but not the ISW as it was created for the express purpose of being a reward for all kinds of contributions and contests, making it inevitable that the price of the early ones will plummet. The problem more people would have with it is much rather that those who get it early gain more by selling it than those who get it late, which is a byproduct of slowly seeding rare items in this manner.
My Monocole eye piece has gone down in price. I am trying to feel upset but the tears won't come out. |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3847
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:32:00 -
[753] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
So, Somer is a "fansite" now? Guard seems to have (vaguely) eluded otherwise:
CCP Guard wrote: To answer the fansite question, they haven't been a registered fansite but we work with other types of enterprises than registered fansites.
Your "surveys" should thus be inclusive of these other kinds of enterprises and not just fansites don't you think? The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
84
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 17:49:00 -
[754] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
Seriously CCP, this is your initial response to this issue. And you made your PR department, ( The CSM ), deliver it to the public.
By Money Making Mitch
Quote:#707Posted: 2013.10.16 16:56 | Report
DNSBLACK wrote:
Enforce your current EULA as it stands now. Then I will take your stupid survey. Once again CCP, community bought and paid for by Somer
but Somer isn't like everyone else... any other RMTer would be gone already. CCP needs to run this by their 'relevant stakeholders' first, they wouldn't want to jeopardize their 'special relationship' with Somer afterall
pathetic response really... we 'might' do something about Somer's questionable RMT-type practices, but we can't do it until AFTER Eve Vegas and talking to our corporate overlords... actually, we'll just get around to it at the Winter Summit... maybe.
i have a feeling they'll just condone Somer's practices in the end, and perhaps even amend the EULA in such a way that what Somer does is made fully legal
By DNSBLACK
Quote:#710Posted: 2013.10.16 17:05 | Report | Edited by: DNSBLACK
At best the entire community has been bought off by somer and your market survey group is scewed. Stop the political crap.
Somer here is an idea "somer special buy a GTC from me get 500 mil blink credits and then fill out this survey and tell CCP what I nice guy Iam.
LoL seriously you guys are amazing
CCP / CSM,
- Have you addressed the issues? A : No. You have only addressed your own business concerns. - Do you know what the issues are? It seems you are turning a blind eye, ignoring your customers. Just for a few, ( hell, alot ) dollars more
Sad, pathetic and disgusting. You are absolutely ######### on your customers. ( You can use any "mean" word to fill in the blank )
Somer, CCP's proxy Aurum store. Brought to you by "Greed is Good" and Somer Blink, ( wearing his designer jeans and monocle, and a wide smile )  |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
343
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:00:00 -
[755] - Quote
SOMER Is not a fansite. But the fact is it doesn't matter. You are failing to grasp the real issues here.
SOMER is an in game corporation, that also exists as an out of game business since they are RMT'ing. The RMT'ing is basically, because of CCP gifts, amounting to the same micro transaction market we as a player base revolted against before.
So we have RMT'ing being endorsed by CCP devs, and a microtransaction economy that was never supposed to exist being "back doored" on us by the devs, MarkeeDragon and CCP.
As for the surverys - is CCP REALLY going to leave it up to the players if EULA violations and favoritism toward in game corporations is OKAY?
Why not release a survey with every exploit known in the game and ask players if we should be allowed to take advantage of the exploits? Why not ask us if we should be able to account share? Why not ask if we should be able to buy isk in the secondary market? Do Hilmar and David really need player opinion surveys to formulate a response? If so they should be fired.
You are a business. You should not be contracting out your business ethics questions to the players. Not to mention the problems with obtaining an accurate survey. How is the survey going to be given? On the forums? What survey tool is being used? Is each account going to get a vote, or each player? How do you plan on making sure you select the right sampling of players to get an accurate survey?
The answers to these things are easy. CCP shouldn't be in the business of giving anyone anything of in game value, be it PLEX, ships, items or isk. They shouldn't be in the business of giving anyone REAL MONEY unless they are an entity that exists completely outside of the game (unlike SOMER) and they have a real contract with them. These questions are NOT HARD people. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
86
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:07:00 -
[756] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:SOMER Is not a fansite. But the fact is it doesn't matter. You are failing to grasp the real issues here.
SOMER is an in game corporation, that also exists as an out of game business since they are RMT'ing. The RMT'ing is basically, because of CCP gifts, amounting to the same micro transaction market we as a player base revolted against before.
So we have RMT'ing being endorsed by CCP devs, and a microtransaction economy that was never supposed to exist being "back doored" on us by the devs, MarkeeDragon and CCP.
As for the surverys - is CCP REALLY going to leave it up to the players if EULA violations and favoritism toward in game corporations is OKAY?
Why not release a survey with every exploit known in the game and ask players if we should be allowed to take advantage of the exploits? Why not ask us if we should be able to account share? Why not ask if we should be able to buy isk in the secondary market? Do Hilmar and David really need player opinion surveys to formulate a response? If so they should be fired.
You are a business. You should not be contracting out your business ethics questions to the players. Not to mention the problems with obtaining an accurate survey. How is the survey going to be given? On the forums? What survey tool is being used? Is each account going to get a vote, or each player? How do you plan on making sure you select the right sampling of players to get an accurate survey?
The answers to these things are easy. CCP shouldn't be in the business of giving anyone anything of in game value, be it PLEX, ships, items or isk. They shouldn't be in the business of giving anyone REAL MONEY unless they are an entity that exists completely outside of the game (unlike SOMER) and they have a real contract with them. These questions are NOT HARD people.
Agree |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:09:00 -
[757] - Quote
Pingu wrote:CCP Guard wrote:We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :) Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer... Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret? Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000? Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions.
If there is one thing I really want to know it is how real life profitable somer/their-rmt-site was and I hope the CSM asks this.
Oh, and ten of twelve accounts unsubbed and the last two end in six days. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
345
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:14:00 -
[758] - Quote
10 accounts unsubbed already, plan on another within the next week.
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
119
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:15:00 -
[759] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Pingu wrote:CCP Guard wrote:We may make mistakes here and there but we're not dumb enough to think we can use Jedi mind tricks on you guys :) Every answer from CCP is like a jedi mind trick. Getting the information we want from you is like pulling teeth. Will give you an example to illustrate this, here are three easy questions for you to (not?) answer... Big list of all the give aways please, by this I mean ships or things created by CCP that were not given to the entire playerbase. You have said nothing was given away in secret, so because it is not a secret there is nothing stopping you from telling us. Pop it all in this thread in one convenient post for people to see, as it is not a secret. If the list is too massive then a link to where you have published it will do. Can we see that which is not secret? Could you could also tell us how many GTC's have been sold by Somer (or their related gtc selling site). What is their $ value profit per GTC sold and how many have they sold; how real life profitable are they? I have two trillion I could convert to ISK so how do I get to become an affiliate to rmt my isk as gtc's for $48,000? Three easy questions to answer: what has been given away, how much has somer/their-rmt-site made and how do I get on the isk to $ conversion gravy train. Let's see how CCP do on these easy questions. If there is one thing I really want to know it is how real life profitable somer/their-rmt-site was and I hope the CSM asks this. Oh, and ten of twelve accounts unsubbed and the last two end in six days. unfortunately i had to roll a couple of subs to fulfill in-game obligations last week, as i don't leave people holding the bag. so i figured i'd stick around and wait to see if this issue resolved itself in the meantime. but CCP is really testing the limits here. they simply don't 'get it'... or they do but are being willfully obtuse. i currently run 11 accounts, but my patience is being tested here. i'm very unhappy with the decision to delay any action until after Eve Vegas, and that crack about the Winter Summit just added more fuel to the fire. you really think we're just going to forget about this **** CCP? seriously? |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
346
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:19:00 -
[760] - Quote
First, let me be clear, I support our CSM 100%. This is not a slight at them, but just 'real talk'.
The CSM was rendered irrelevant in this discussion the day CCP decided to endorse and support financially an RMT'ing 'lottery' that is nothing more than a back door aurum store.
Why? Because the CSM made it clear in the past that we didn't want micro transactions, so why support them through SOMER? Clearly the wishes of CSM were not relevant to how CCP decided to do business.
In addition, they have allowed SOMERblink to operate an RMT operation outside of the EULA. If the EULA is not 'gospel' then how, tell me, just how is the CSM white paper to be taken any seriously.
My point is that CCP has shown no respect for the CSM on this issue so far, and now their response is to ask you to create a "survey"?
You all have been thrown in front of a bus. |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
126
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:22:00 -
[761] - Quote
honestly, that 'survey' crap just felt like a slap in the face to me |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:28:00 -
[762] - Quote
Given the current situation I'd say I would unsub, if I hadn't done it almost 2 years ago and plexed my account since then with isk  |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
255
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:30:00 -
[763] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:honestly, that 'survey' crap just felt like a slap in the face to me
Because it was. The only part they left off after the slap was the saying " now shut up and sit down you female dog" |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
368
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:30:00 -
[764] - Quote
While reading through this thread, a subtle thought has crossed my mind - I wonder if CCP Soundwave knew about this?
There was this phrase, "...going to a more competitive game..." linked with his departure. Perhaps he knew about this behind the door practice and felt it was ruining the Eve experience. Perhaps he complained and his words fell on deaf ears. So being the hard core gamer he always appeared to be, he took the last recourse he could - he left.
Just a wild thought of mine as I read this thread. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4402
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:35:00 -
[765] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:DNSBLACK wrote: CCP Guard wrote: We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
HEY CCP IAM THIS= relevant stakeholders in the company. Who hasnt been bought
BUT AFTER YOUR ACTIONS i FEEL MORE LIKE THIS= Irrelevant stakeholders in the company who you dont give 2 PPHHucks about. By all means have a grand old time in Vegas.
NEQ that response from CCP Guard really just pissed me off. we need to run it by 'relevant stakeholders'?!?! WHAT THE **** ARE YOUR CUSTOMERS?
Apparently, not relevant stakeholders, have you got the memo by now?  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
126
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:36:00 -
[766] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Apparently, not relevant stakeholders, have you got the memo by now?  i assume they likely meant their EA overlords when they said that ****. if the shoe fits... |

Shai 'Hulud
79
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:38:00 -
[767] - Quote
Let's also have a poll on whether women should have the right to vote, slavery and genocide 
I won't bother getting into the technical problems with such a poll, because you don't need a ******* poll to understand that you should enforce the game rules and avoid favoritism. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Jimmy Farrere
University of Caille Gallente Federation
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:42:00 -
[768] - Quote
http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/third-party-policies/
Quote: Real money trading Trading in-game items for real-life currency or services is NOT allowed under any circumstances.
Any circumstances CCP? |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
126
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:43:00 -
[769] - Quote
Jimmy Farrere wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/third-party-policies/ Quote: Real money trading Trading in-game items for real-life currency or services is NOT allowed under any circumstances.
Any circumstances CCP? some people are more equal than others  |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:44:00 -
[770] - Quote
Ok I know your going to ask me this question " can you have my stuff" and my answer is yes you can. I cut a deal with the owner of battle clinic. He is going to give me 90% of his sales commission for selling GTC at his site for doing this. If you by a GTC from battle clinic you will get 1 ticket into my charcter raffle. Battle clinc will be running this promotion for 1 month at the e nd of the promotion I will get my commission and he will pick a winner. At that point we will do a charcter transfer on the forums.
I wish all of you the best of luck. I never thought I could sell my charcter for money but thanks to CCP and somer I guess this is legal now due to past practice. If Iam going to quit I might as well profit. |
|

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1445
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:45:00 -
[771] - Quote
Possible survey question?
Should CCP show the likes of Somer Blink:
1) Some favouritism
2) A great deal of favouritism
Thank you for your input. This is not a signature. |

Kate stark
630
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:45:00 -
[772] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat.
don't make the survey a longwinded one. honestly. there's no faster way to lower participation than to make a survey that takes 45 mins with nearly identical questions.
alternatively for the same feedback, you could just read the thread. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Shai 'Hulud
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:48:00 -
[773] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat. don't make the survey a longwinded one. honestly. there's no faster way to lower participation than to make a survey that takes 45 mins with nearly identical questions. alternatively for the same feedback, you could just read the thread. The survey is designed to replace this thread. In a survey they have final say over the questions, and thus over the possible results. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
633
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:50:00 -
[774] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Kate stark wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Hi again everyone.
Just a small update. We've been following the discussion and we are working on and/or looking at the topics brought up in this thread but as I talked about in the original post and in follow-up posts, we're making no fast decisions on any policies apart from the pausing of rare in-game reward programs. For all policy matters we are sitting down with relevant stakeholders and taking our time with the various feedback from the various channels so that what we end up with makes sense not just for the cases on people's minds right now, but also other current cases and potential future ones. Hasty decisions are not the solution here. As we've stated, we are working on a more visible framework for how we reward and encourage third party initiatives. Work that had partly started but has been accelerated because of recent events. The timeline will probably run through the CSM winter summit with some information likely to be available sooner.
We had a good meeting with the CSM today where we discussed how we'll proceed in terms of gathering feedback on specific points of the debate through surveys. We're also looking at the EULA questions brought up in this discussion, another matter that will take some time and input from relevant stakeholders in the company.
A lot of us will be away for EVE Vegas in the coming days and we hope to meet some of you there for a chat. don't make the survey a longwinded one. honestly. there's no faster way to lower participation than to make a survey that takes 45 mins with nearly identical questions. alternatively for the same feedback, you could just read the thread. The survey is designed to replace this thread. In a survey they have final say over the questions, and thus over the possible results.
and just like that, problem solved.
this is some nice sand... Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Shai 'Hulud
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:52:00 -
[775] - Quote
Basically what the poll/survey says is that they believe the rage in this thread is isolated, and not the feelings of community as a whole. It also hints that they STILL don't understand why people are mad. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
128
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 18:52:00 -
[776] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: and just like that, problem solved.
this is some nice sand...
feels more like a litter box to me... |

Din Chao
397
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:02:00 -
[777] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
My account expires in one day, so that's one less voice of dissent you'll get in your skewed, condescending "survey." Congratulations, CSM 8 just made it's mark of irrelevancy. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
90
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:15:00 -
[778] - Quote
I'm so angry over CCP's greed. 
Hell, I, now, wouldn't be surprised if it were revealed that :
- Somer is actually run by CCP itself - As the available prizes are spawned, so too are the so called "winners"
A "Win / Win" situation for CCP, financially. A huge blemish on their reputation and integrity.
Somer is the Aurum store that they always wanted, since they decided that they wanted to go the microtransaction path with Eve. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
454
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:16:00 -
[779] - Quote
Trebor comes in. Says something. Puts foot in mouth again. And people wonder why the CSM is a ******* joke. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
351
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:23:00 -
[780] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Basically what the poll/survey says is that they believe the rage in this thread is isolated, and not the feelings of community as a whole. It also hints that they STILL don't understand why people are mad.
Opinions of the community are important, but it does not change the facts:
1) SOMERblink is an RMT scam being supported by CCP devs (intentionally or not).
2) SOMERblink is thus, by default, a micro transaction marketplace, allowing CCP to sell off high value items to the community.
Considering the outrage over the aurum store, and gold ammo, CCP and SOMBERblink have done a very good job sneaking #2 in on the community. What the CSM should do is to make sure the community is aware of these two points first.
And what's even better - this particular micro transaction market lets them sell the same high value item over and over again. LOL.
|
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4404
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:27:00 -
[781] - Quote
Din Chao wrote: My account expires in one day, so that's one less voice of dissent you'll get in your skewed, condescending "survey." Congratulations, CSM 8 just made it's mark of irrelevancy.
I hate to break it for you, but if you check the last years scandals, every single time the CSM was not asked for an opinion and got just completely bypassed.
An istitution that is bypassed at every relevant / game changing decision is a smokescreen, not an institution.  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
457
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:28:00 -
[782] - Quote
CCP believed that the whole Monoclegate fiasco was also "isolated", and that the rage was "very predictable feedback". He [Hilmar] also said that it was more important to see what we did with our actions, not what we said. Five-thousand-plus accounts unsubscribed later in under a week, Hilmar came out and said, "****, bluff called!" and relented. Once again, I am not saying this is on-par with the "Golden Ammo"/"Golden Scorpion" issue, but it does show how CCP tends to shove their heads in the sand and claim anything that elicits rage because of their business practices and shadiness is "isolated rage".
They are not doing very good with that track record of predicting that sort of thing. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
353
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:34:00 -
[783] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:CCP believed that the whole Monoclegate fiasco was also "isolated", and that the rage was "very predictable feedback". He also said that it was more important to see what we did with our actions, not what we said. Five-thousand-plus accounts unsubscribed later in under a week, Hilmar came out and said, "****, bluff called!" and relented. Once again, I am not saying this is on-par with the "Golden Ammo"/"Golden Scorpion" issue, but it does show how CCP tends to shove their heads in the sand and claim anything that elicits rage because of their business practices and shadiness is "isolated rage".
They are not doing very good with that track record of predicting that sort of thing.
Anya, you are incorrect. It IS on par. In fact it is worse.
By giving items to a RMT'ing entity, in particular one that uses GTC's sales as the RMT vehicle, CCP is selling their golden ammo.
They have created a microtransaction market, but this time they are using an RMT'ing player corp to do it. That, combined with the very fact that they would do this in spite of the prior anti-microtransaction outrage makes it even more egregious in my mind.
It's basically the same thing, only sneakier and unethical to boot. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
458
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:45:00 -
[784] - Quote
I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:48:00 -
[785] - Quote
Well, at least next year you know on who you have to vote for CSM to make your votes count.
I told you... vote PB for CSM... she will defend our interests... but no one ever listens to big chief raven666wings  |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
458
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:55:00 -
[786] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Well, at least next year you know on who you have to vote for CSM to make your votes count and not let these FUBAR situations happen. I told you... vote PB for CSM... she will defend our interests... but no one ever listens to big chief raven666wings 
That's because you're insane, you doofus. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
68
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 19:57:00 -
[787] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
You guys are totally useless.
So you had a 2 hour discussion and all you have to show us is NOTHING.
All you had to do was read all these posts with a pad and pen to jot down the essential arguments and state each to Ccp and ask for action points. We don't need a survey as all the points have now been made about one hundred times in here. Albeit with little Ccp response.
Hell on the topic of not caring about this thread, the csm is taking the same approach as Ccp - little by way of commentary and absolutely no progress.
Is SOMER still RMTing? For not pulling the offer in light of this debate shows either a total lack of prudence, that Ccp have skyped and given assurances or that I'm mad.
I'm not resubbing screw this survey. I just wish I was at the meeting. The csm needs to not fear a hard encounter because that is what is being asked for by the players. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2697
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:04:00 -
[788] - Quote
Lotta people out for blood. Here's a list of things that will NOT happen:
- SOMER (the RL human) facing repercussions (aside from possibly changing the way he incentivizes affiliate clicks)
- SOMER (the RL human) Ending his affiliate relationship w/ CCP
- SOMER (the spaceship barby) significantly altering his gambling site or game organization under duress
- Any previously issued game items being taken back (under duress, CCP could ask.)
- The CSM actually influencing anything. They just get to talk. It's a core business decision. I just don't see it happening. ...but it might look like CCP is "in talks"
- Second Life-style RMT getting legitimized. That's just too radical a move for CCP... all other consequences aside.
- An answer before 2014.
- CCP confining itself on "limited edition" issuance
- Players will be ultimately happy with how it all works out
- Punishment for anyone for what is in the past with regards to this issue/event/whatever
- This issue/event/whatever having an effect on unsanctioned RMT
I could explain in a wall of text why I think those are all true... a lot of them should be obvious. I've got better stuff to do though... think it just goes here 'for the record'.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
461
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:05:00 -
[789] - Quote
Here's a question:
Why is the CSM, once again, the go-to group for cleaning up the mess? Why hasn't the CSM been involved to begin with?
Oh, right...because CCP doesn't care about them unless it's to shut us the hell up! Go ahead CCP, respond to me (we know you won't). |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
117
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:13:00 -
[790] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific!
This stuff has been all over the forums of late, but here's a few threads to get you started:
CCP reintroducing the Gold Magate and adding in new Guardian-Vexors through Somer Blink
A review of player giveaways with CCP and third party sites
CSM Statement on the SOMER Promotion (with reply from CCP Pokethulu)
SomerGate - Questions.
Ishukone Ships and Surrounding issues... Coming SOON (TM)
And a few articles from player-run sties:
SOMERblink: Serving the Eve Community, Not a Community Service
SOMER of rage
Rare Item Lottery Sparks Controversy
CCP Changes Somer Blink Giveaway
CCP Secretly Gifted SOMER Blink Ishukone Scorpions
There's a lot of material to get through; most of the relevant stuff isn't in the first posts, but in conversations that develop in the responses. The thread we are currently in, being one of the latest, probably has the most comprehensive information, but it is still a lot to dig through. Basically though, there are multiple allegations of actions of favoritism of CCP towards SOMER Blink, compounded with the RMT-like nature of SOMER's operation, CCP's choice of a for-profit organization over true community services as a target for giveaways, CCP upsetting the balance of the sandbox by giving SOMER Blink a clear advantage over their competitors, possible connections between CCP employees and SOMER (devs who may have been former members of SOMER Blink before being hired, etc.), and the list goes on.
The bottom line is that there is certainly the appearance of a lot of impropriety going on between CCP and SOMER Blink. How much of it is substantiated has yet to be fully discovered, but there is enough evidence to warrant concern, and we may all still be surprised at exactly how far this goes. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
357
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:15:00 -
[791] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:I'll admit to being ignorant of the other issues in that I don't know the specifics, but I know of them. The only one I am aware of and know the details of is the members of Blink receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions, so if you wouldn't mind linking me to the other issues at hand for me to look through, that'd be terrific!
A number of people have posted explanations but you can refer to mine on this page (post #510):
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=26
But in short:
Basically, every time you buy GTC you get 200M in "SOMER isk". This has created some confusion for some - as they think that this intermediate currency prevents this from being RMT, but it actually makes no difference since that intermediate currency (which was obtained with cash) is redeemable for isk and in game items through raffles. \
Because SOMER gets cash for every GTC sold, you are basically buying somer isk from them by purchasing a GTC. This also means that whenever you purchase somer isk, CCP and MarkeeDragon also profit.
Now, to simplify things, suppose an item is completely bid on using SOMER isk. Basically, SOMER has converted that item entirely into cash, since they get no real isk for it. You bought it with your SOMER isk, which is basically an intermediate currency you purchased with cash.
In fact the item need not exist since you could potentially take the isk buy out. In which case SOMER just turned isk into cash. This is especially important when it comes to high end items like SOE ships, IW Scorps, etc., since these items draw bids, yet in the end if SOMER is able to convince you to take the isk instead, they get to use the ship over again as a promotional (although I am not sure if this actually happened or not).
Now, because CCP is giving them items to sell and because those items are unique and only available through SOMER, SOMER is basically a proxy aurum market, a micro transaction market. And if one of those items "sells" for somer isk then some amount of cash is made by SOMER, CCP, and MarkeeDragon. All three profit from the raffling of the item.
And because you may choose to take the buy out, they can continue to raffle the same item again.
Many of the arguments against this view of the situation revolve around the fact that there is an element of "chance" involved in the raffle. But this is not really relevant from the SOMER/CCP/MarkeeDragon side of things. They assume ZERO risk. The item is "sold" as far as SOMER is concerned, as they get exactly what they want for it. They've effectively sold it to the group of people who have bid on the item. The only people taking any risk are those poor folks. Hell, even in Vegas the house assumes some risk, but not SOMER, and by association, not MarkeeDragon or CCP. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
133
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:23:00 -
[792] - Quote
well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:23:00 -
[793] - Quote
Yeh so players have made at least two thousands posts on this now. Frankly, most of them are well reasoned logical posts, definitely good material for the CSM to work with.
CCP has done nothing.
CSM has had a 2 hour meeting and agreed with CCP 'not enough feedback has been received we need a survey'.
Guess who is deciding what questions make it into the survey?
Every time I log on to check if my game is ok again, I end up having to get up off the floor after falling of my chair laughing.
CCP please please please employ some competent staff. At least staff that doesn't have an addiction to spawning items and gifting them to in game entities... |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
357
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:27:00 -
[794] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. a look at the EULA does seem to define Somer's bonus isk incentives as illegal game behavior. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold.
I am curious Mitch, and this is not meant as a challenge but just food for thought:
How would you feel if I sold GTC cards for "Sorn Isk" and then allowed you to trade that isk directly (no raffle) for real isk or in game items?
Now what if some of those in game items are rare items provided to me by CCP?
Because there is functionally no difference on the RMT side of this with SOMER. The fact that you might not get the item does not change the fact that SOMER has basically sold it to someone.
So do you think that players should be able to sell items and isk for cash as long as that cash is the cash gained from a GTC sale?
I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case.
I am also curious how other GTC sellers feel about this whole thing, since clearly you'd be silly not to buy your GTC's from SOMER/MarkeeDragon since those come with an extra 200M isk. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
133
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:36:00 -
[795] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:well, i personally did not have any issues with Somer's GTC / 200mil credit policy but i did find it extremely interesting how CCP tried to skirt around the issue once it was brought up. a look at the EULA does seem to define Somer's bonus isk incentives as illegal game behavior. i am curious to see how that will be resolved under the current EULA because it seems under current rules they must be censured. i predict either a 'clarification' in the EULA which will legitimize the bonus credit practice, or a stop to the practice but no real punishment/consequences for the transactions up-to-date. the only issue i personally had with Somer was the insider trading with SIW for the ~6 weeks between gifting and TMC breaking the story, but that in itself isn't a crime within eve, although it does illustrate how some people's concerns about Somer's honesty might have merit. in my opinion, the full responsibility for this debacle falls entirely upon CCP. they have a CSM and IA that are supposed to prevent this from happening, yet happen it did. so, who watches the watchman? the players do. this is why we can't let this issue just go away. if we give them an inch, they will take the whole mile. this will only be the start if we fold. I am curious Mitch, and this is not meant as a challenge but just food for thought: How would you feel if I sold GTC cards for "Sorn Isk" and then allowed you to trade that isk for real isk or in game items? Now what if some of those in game items are rare items provided to me by CCP? Because there is functionally no difference on the RMT side of this with SOMER. The fact that you might not get the item does not change the fact that SOMER has basically sold it to someone. So do you think that players should be able to sell items and isk for cash as long as that cash is the cash gained from a GTC sale? I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case. I am also curious how other GTC sellers feel about this whole thing, since clearly you'd be silly not to buy your GTC's from SOMER/MarkeeDragon since those come with an extra 200M isk.
when the facts are laid out like that, in a logical progression, i have no choice but to agree with the people saying that this is an RMT activity. you buy the GTC from Somer (obviously you're doing it for the bonus blink credit), take the 200mil, you buy a ticket (or all of them) on some item(s), and then cash them out... you've basically received free stuff for your GTC purchase. adding rare items to the mix only makes the offense more egregious. it pains me to say all of that, because i have played Somer Blink myself, have won items through them, etc. and found some of the staff to be pretty friendly people overall. regardless of that though, i do not think CCP should be vouching for them or giving them any preferential treatment, and i definitely do not agree with devs spawning rare items for them, either to be used a lotto item, or as a token of appreciation. Somer has enough isk to purchase rare ships to auction off and to compensate their employees generously. |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:40:00 -
[796] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:I think a lot more people will be selling GTC's if this is the case.
I was serious when I posted earlier that I want to know how to do this so I can cash in my two trillion for $48,000. I will be offering 200million and adding an extra .01 ISK with mine...
edit: 200 million IN GAME ISK. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
359
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 20:48:00 -
[797] - Quote
There is part of me, that is willing to concede that MAYBE not even SOMERblink meant this to be an RMT scam. They have overheard for hardware and bandwith I am sure, and may have been interest in simply recouping some of the costs. Who knows?
I find it somewhat hard to believe however, partly because of their involvement with MarkeeDragon, who is known to have violated or skirted EULA's before. Indeed he admits that he even talks to game companies about ways to make money off of the secondary market without violating the EULA. Did he discuss this with CCP? It just seem odd that SOMER picked that time code seller of all people.
I mean, why not use evetimecodes? They are perhaps the single most trusted GTC seller after all and wholly committed to the ECE community. Instead however, they basically undercut evetimecodes, and that to me raises a great number of questions about their 'altruism'.
Funny that CCP do a devblog on Diana Dial when all this time they've been funding and endorsing unfair competition in the GTC market by allowing SOMER to hand out isk with its GTC's.
As I said - this stuff goes deep. Surveys are lip service. This is the sort of thing that requires an investigation into SOMER, CCP, the devs that have been giving items to SOMER, connections to MarkeeDragon, etc..
David Reid and Hilmar are about the only opinions I trust on this at all from within the walls of CCP. Everything else is just damage control - bad damage control at that. |

Din Chao
398
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:00:00 -
[798] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CSM has had a 2 hour meeting and agreed with CCP 'not enough feedback has been received we need a survey'. Let me correct you here. I'm listening to Crossing Zebras right now, the "CSM8: October Interview" with Trebor.
The CSM didn't agree with CCP that a survey was needed.
It was the CSM's ******* idea!!
Hundreds of posts, and they still can't decide what their own ******* opinion is without a survey. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
266
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:13:00 -
[799] - Quote
https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
220
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:14:00 -
[800] - Quote
Vote Senator McLaughlin for CSM! Don't get caught on the wrong side of the fence!  |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:15:00 -
[801] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. LOL
looks like i found my next hustle  |

Abditus Cularius
Clancularius Industries
224
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:19:00 -
[802] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing.
That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. |

Dalilus
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
48
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:22:00 -
[803] - Quote
I find it fascinating that so far CCP and the CSM have managed to alienate at one time or another almost every single player group in EVE, with 2 more months to finish the year. From incursion running carebears to lottery players most everyone has a strong opinion about a 'something' that affects their gameplay or sensibilities. If I was still studying political science my thesis would be about CCP and their player base......forget about ship balancing or third party handouts, the intrigue and backstabbing is worthy of any of the more elightened medieval courts. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:22:00 -
[804] - Quote
Abditus Cularius wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. i know you are a space-wealthy man who buys up a lot of rare ships, etc., i remember some of your forum posts. you've been shilling for Somer pretty hard, are you one of their employees? |

Din Chao
401
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:27:00 -
[805] - Quote
Abditus Cularius wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. Yes, but thanks to CCP, SOMER has a spotlight on it, a "community spotlight" if you will...
Just because the movie "Super Size Me" focused on McDonald's, doesn't mean Burger King is health food. |

Shai 'Hulud
86
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:31:00 -
[806] - Quote
Abditus Cularius wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. That changes things how?
Whether something is right or wrong has nothing to do with when people learn about it. Every time I see you "add" to this conversation, it's just some elitist "that's old news." All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
138
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:34:00 -
[807] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Abditus Cularius wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. That changes things how? Whether something is right or wrong has nothing to do with when people learn about it. Every time I see you "add" to this conversation, it's just some elitist "that's old news." it's funny because he's a collector of rare ships and should be outraged... but he isn't. methinks it's because he's a Somer employee alt. |

Shai 'Hulud
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:47:00 -
[808] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Abditus Cularius wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:https://eve-games.net/
I guess the trend is growing. That site has been doing that for weeks before Mittens told you to notice this. So have about a dozen other sites, some for longer than blinks. That changes things how? Whether something is right or wrong has nothing to do with when people learn about it. Every time I see you "add" to this conversation, it's just some elitist "that's old news." it's funny because he's a collector of rare ships and should be outraged... but he isn't. methinks it's because he's a Somer employee alt. Or he wants a legal method to monetize his EVE assets (no tie to SOMER needed).
Perhaps I should be more selfish too. At this point I would love to unload my 500b for some cash. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

CarlosB
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:47:00 -
[809] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:A number of people have posted explanations but you can refer to mine on this page (post #510): https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=26But in short: Basically, every time you buy GTC you get 200M in "SOMER isk". This has created some confusion for some - as they think that this intermediate currency prevents this from being RMT, but it actually makes no difference since that intermediate currency (which was obtained with cash) is redeemable for isk and in game items through raffles. \ Because SOMER gets cash for every GTC sold, you are basically buying somer isk from them by purchasing a GTC. This also means that whenever you purchase somer isk, CCP and MarkeeDragon also profit. Now, to simplify things, suppose an item is completely bid on using SOMER isk. Basically, SOMER has converted that item entirely into cash, since they get no real isk for it. You bought it with your SOMER isk, which is basically an intermediate currency you purchased with cash. In fact the item need not exist since you could potentially take the isk buy out. In which case SOMER just turned isk into cash. This is especially important when it comes to high end items like SOE ships, IW Scorps, etc., since these items draw bids, yet in the end if SOMER is able to convince you to take the isk instead, they get to use the ship over again as a promotional (although I am not sure if this actually happened or not). Now, because CCP is giving them items to sell and because those items are unique and only available through SOMER, SOMER is basically a proxy aurum market, a micro transaction market. And if one of those items "sells" for somer isk then some amount of cash is made by SOMER, CCP, and MarkeeDragon. All three profit from the raffling of the item. And because you may choose to take the buy out, they can continue to raffle the same item again. Many of the arguments against this view of the situation revolve around the fact that there is an element of "chance" involved in the raffle. But this is not really relevant from the SOMER/CCP/MarkeeDragon side of things. They assume ZERO risk. The item is "sold" as far as SOMER is concerned, as they get exactly what they want for it. They've effectively sold it to the group of people who have bid on the item. The only people taking any risk are those poor folks. Hell, even in Vegas the house assumes some risk, but not SOMER, and by association, not MarkeeDragon or CCP.
The thing is easy as an old time EVE player. Games tend to have more game Money circulating then there should be so the thing is easy since CCP ain't able to even folow thei're own EULA:
1- Change the EULA to make RMT legal so every one can make real money out of it not only SOMMER and few others favored by CCP itself. (since there are people that wanna buy GTC's instead of buying directly the subscription off CCP);
2- Make isk sinks, meaning make your own SOMMER or assume once and for all that SOMMER is part of CCP itself (cause there is on better way of controlling inflaction then taking currency off circulation).
Personaly i think that CCP should take the the second option since is the most aceptable, cause RMT would kill the sandbox. |

Abditus Cularius
Clancularius Industries
224
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:58:00 -
[810] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:...should be outraged...
Alternatively, I knew iscorps were being given out like candy and never bought one.
I also find the idea of videogame outrage incredibly sad, which may have something to do with it.
|
|

Dani Lizardov
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
26
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 21:58:00 -
[811] - Quote
Quote:1- Change the EULA to make RMT legal so every one can make real money out of it not only SOMMER and few others favored by CCP itself. (since there are people that wanna buy GTC's instead of buying directly the subscription off CCP);
Why do I buy GTCs? Gé¼14.95 a month that is 15 EURO for 30 days play time
$34.99 for a GTC, that is 35 USD for 60 days play time
I am from Bulgaria. 1 $ = 1.44 BGN Gé¼1 = 2 BGN
so should I pay 30 BGN for 30 days or pay 50 BGN for 60 days What do you think? |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
140
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:03:00 -
[812] - Quote
Abditus Cularius wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:...should be outraged... Alternatively, I knew iscorps were being given out like candy and never bought one. I also find the idea of videogame outrage incredibly sad, which may have something to do with it. you've not contributed a single constructive post in all these threads.
i think my explanation fits better. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2502
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:03:00 -
[813] - Quote
CCP seem completely incapable of any decisive action here; the rabbit-in-headlights stare is amazing to see.
We're now presented with the news that the CSM spent 2 hours in discussion with CCP resulting in a decision of producing a survey to find out what the players think on the highly complicated and nuanced issue of "should CCP actually enforce its own rules?". CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
275
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:29:00 -
[814] - Quote
You right I failed to stay frosty. I assumed after the last incident I would not have to deal with **** like this ever again. Now that I have had my eyes open and have taken up the cause it seems like a lot of groups have fallen off.
I am sorry goons for not paying attention. I am sorry eve players I failed to watch the company store. I put my trust in people and CCP and maybe that was what I did wrong. I know we wont burn JITA over this cause Somer has done a great job buying off the community and CCP. Most of you love to play it and some of you have won a lot of cool stuff. But I didn't start playing eve to see it get pimped out and abused by micro RMT. The only survey you need to fill out is clicking cancel account button. That should be enough.
1000 accounts = $150,000 dollars I plan on closing 3 of mine tonight and will keep DNSBlack on until he get auction off. I already have 100 confirmed others. We may not make a dent into CCP but I guess this says it all
http://codgerville.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/lastgreatactofdefiance-1.gif
I am sorry my friends, truly I am cause I know the faces and stories of those at CCP more then most but you have crossed my line in the sand and I cannot continue support your company when it will not honor the EULA contract you agreed to enforce with in your game. |

Frying Doom
2609
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:33:00 -
[815] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
I will admit I do have some questions related to these surveys but the first thing I want to say is the fact I am not worried about CCP rigging the results. If they do it will be rather obvious and it will cost them more money than anything in the history of this game as the stench rises.
Now on to the survey.
Will CCP and the CSM be including in its survey the reason for the survey? For example the fact that CCP gave out ships valued at around half a trillion isk to a for profit site, that the site in question and CCP failed to disclose that this gift had been given (personally I don't see this as Somers fault, they were just cashing in the gift, CCP should have publicly disclosed this gift) and that this action effected the sandbox in which we all play. Also including how many of these ships were sold by Somer employees so that players can see the total effect to the sandbox. With a notation of how they once again did not bother to speak to the CSM, AGAIN.
or will it be a blind survey so they are more likely to get the answers that they want?
Now on to the questions.
The term "This is a grey area" should be removed, the last thing we need is ambiguity in this matter.
Now as to the questions.
I noticed you listed no questions differing community sites from for profit sites, (unless you mean the business models bit, at which point you should clearly state "for profit" as a community site can have a business model and not actually be for profit) these are two totally different beasts and would have massively different answers. Community sites and for profit sites should have seperate sections on the survey, for example I am all for CCP flying the hosts of Crossing Zebras, the RvB leaders or for that matter The Mittani, to the fan fest, paying for there tickets, rooms, airfares ect but I do not believe that a for profit site should be given anything. Look at the number of hours Xander put into this game prior to the CSM8 elections interviewing all of the prospective candidates, rewarding that kind of dedication is a wonderful idea. Paying anything to a site that only gives to the community so they increase their exposure and subsequently their profits is just rediculous, they are already being paid or attempting to get paid for their time.
Also I noticed no mention of non-tradable items for gifts. Personally I like the idea of people getting gifts that they can not sell on but can use to show the community that they give and that they have been recognised. For example giving Chribba's little hi-sec mining barge a special skin or giving each CSM member a special ship, differing for each CSM.
The survey should cover items such as plex, ships, cash, fan fest tickets, plane fares, meals, soulbound items, web hosting and other incentives specifically focused on there possible effects to the sandbox.
So let me be clear on this community sites are sites operated by people for the good of the community and they are not trying to get reimbersed for their time. These are the sites CCP should be supporting, from my perspective.
My point on "For profit" businesses is easy to cover in a survey. Give them nothing.
For profit sites are trying to pay them selves for their time and are in it to make a profit, they may support the community in events but in most places that is called advertising. CCP should not in my opinion be supporting these businesses as they are already trying to support them selves. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Frying Doom
2609
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:33:00 -
[816] - Quote
The other thing that was not covered is transperancy. Now I personally would like to see a web register avaliable for all players to see, for all of the gifts that CCP gives out. This register to be updated before they give out these gifts for example "Ishukone Watch Scorpions 30 to Somer blink" and then list why they are being given them and a date a week in advance" or "50 plex for EvE Vegas to be given at random" with the reason promotional and a date a week in advance. This will make this whole thing transperant to the playerbase and make CCP think before it decides to hand out 300-600 billion in ship to a for profit site's employees.
A quick note on Somers RMT and the other RMT sites following the same pattern, personally I think they should just stop offering the fake convetable isk but given CCPs past record in relation to RMT and how they have never before been leniant. They must do what they have done before, otherwise they have condemned so peoples RMT while favoring others RMT because it used a slightly different model and the stench from that will clear the hall.
Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
275
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:36:00 -
[817] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:The other thing that was not covered is transparency. Now I personally would like to see a web register available for all players to see, for all of the gifts that CCP gives out. This register to be updated before they give out these gifts for example "Ishukone Watch Scorpions 30 to Somer blink" and then list why they are being given them and a date a week in advance" or "50 plex for EvE Vegas to be given at random" with the reason promotional and a date a week in advance. This will make this whole thing transparent to the playerbase and make CCP think before it decides to hand out 300-600 billion in ship to a for profit site's employees.
A quick note on Somers RMT and the other RMT sites following the same pattern, personally I think they should just stop offering the fake convertible isk but given CCPs past record in relation to RMT and how they have never before been lenient. They must do what they have done before, otherwise they have condemned so peoples RMT while favoring others RMT because it used a slightly different model and the stench from that will clear the hall.
How dare you speak to CCP like a stakeholder. Shame on you |

Lucretia DeWinter
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 22:36:00 -
[818] - Quote
SOMER's lottery - fine and I have no issue with it. SOMER publicising Markee Dragon - fine and I have no issue with it. SOMER receiving their affiliate dollars for GTC sales referrals through their link - fine too.
Where it becomes an issue IMO is how SOMER operates blink credit and the GTC bonus scheme.
Essentially, SOMER is duping ISK and creating an infinite pool of EVE wealth from nothing. By tying this in with GTC sales, this is clearly an RMT transaction, although whether SOMER can be said to be directly selling in game items for cash is a matter for the investigation to decide. I personally don't think they are directly RMTing in game ISK/items, but by incentivising their own GTC sales through the bonus blink credit scheme, are compromising the spirit of anti-RMT clauses in the TOS/EULA.
What is also an issue is that CCP should not directly sponsor or support (overtly or secretly) any organisation with in game items, be they ships, ISK, PLEX or anything else that has a material effect or value in EVE. The whole rewarding fansites idea is noble at heart, but should be constrained to rewards that do not affect the integrity of EVE. Good examples of this have been proposed in this thread already - lore items, fluff rewards, publicity via Community Spotlight etc.
CCP's investigation of this issue will take time. With any investigation, discovery has to take place. This involves notifications, interviews, audits and most importantly, confidentiality instructions and possibly even legal holds.
This would prevent people form providing the more detailed answers we all want to see until the investigations are concluded and the results known.
Whilst we are all stakeholders as customers, relevant stakeholders is not a slight to us, just that it refers to the people who have ownership for systems, processes and departments involved. The survey information also has potential value to provide feedback for CCPs future direction on 3rd party rewards.
What I would like to see happen:
CCP strongly recommends that SOMER pauses their blink credit bonus scheme for GTC sales, pending further investigation with the clear message that continued operation will be viewed negatively should an investigation decide that SOMERs GTC operation is classed as RMT.
The CSM should remain heavily involved in discussions and the ongoing investigation and discovery process and maintain their own notes for later publication.
Should SOMER or any other organisation operating similarly in game incentives for GTC sales be classified as RMT, then the appropriate revocations and remediation be taken to remove those particular incentives.
Damage caused to in game integrity through introduction of items, ISK or other material in game resources be repaired or removed, with appropriate roll-back compensation to any uninvolved players.
Continued or persistent use of RMT incentives be dealt with to the full extent of the EULA/TOS including immediate and permanent bans and pursuit of 3rd party resources by appropriate measures, for example, DMCA intellectual property violations.
CCP and the CSM should independently provide as full disclosure of the investigative process and results as is legally and ethically possible.
Apologies for a wall of text, but I wanted to put my opinions forward for visibility. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3130
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:38:00 -
[819] - Quote
Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Rex Jagger
V I R I I Ineluctable.
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:39:00 -
[820] - Quote
This is such bullshit , *unsubs 3 accounts. Fix this ccp. I am severly dissappointed. |
|

Grendel Jagger
The Jagger Crime Syndicate Dark Solar Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:41:00 -
[821] - Quote
Confirming im an alt of Rex Jagger, fix this CCP. |

Frying Doom
2613
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:46:00 -
[822] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: * The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
Best Trebor
As you decided to pop in a couple of quick questions some of them in my post above.
1) Is this going to be a blind survey to the community or are CCP going to explain in the survey why it exists? 2) Is the community sites and for profit sites part of the survey going to be separated 3) Will the surveys be put up for comment before they go out.
As surveys can be worded and structured to give the results you require, rather than the truth. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
143
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:46:00 -
[823] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor
so you're saying we won't be getting an answer on anything for months... due to what exactly? significant legal issues being? legal issues of sponsoring a gambling site? this sounds like an acknowledgement that the giveaways are going to continue, no matter what we think.
also, did you really just suggest that we protest by... shutting up?
there is already plenty of data on these forums, we don't need to take a survey with massaged questions that lead to the answers wanted by CCP while avoiding the actual issues, which is what i feel the whole purpose of it is.
seems like instead of acknowledging mistakes and working to fix them, CCP is choosing to double down on their 'special relationships' and is hoping that pushing back a discussion will make people just forget about it. |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:48:00 -
[824] - Quote
Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular.
-Gifts- CCP is a business. The sole purpose of a business is to make money. If CCP wants to give gifts to users that are helping them be profitable, and in turn keep churning out content for YOU, then that's their prerogative. I would imagine if YOU sold thousands upon thousands of GTC's, as Somer has done, then you would get some tasty gifts as well. What's next? A rage post about how CCP "secretly" gave all their sales staff a Christmas bonus last year, and didn't run it by the community first? Common guys, let's get some perspective here.
This is about Money. Actual real money. This is not little league where we don't keep score and everyone is a winner. This is business. Want free stuff? Spend 6 months of your life coding a fan site, another 6 months getting users to sign up, then monetize it by selling GTC's and then spend the rest of your time, updating and maintaining it.
Sounds like a lot of work for a few free space pixels doesn't it?
-Prizes-
I would love some stuff to give away to my users from CCP, but Out of Game Items just wont work.
80% of my users won't even enter an email address (so they can reset their passwords automatically) Now you expect them to give their names and addresses? Not to mention the time I would have to spend to package and ship them a t-shirt? Spending 10 dollars in time, materials, and shipping all for what? A 2 dollar piece of a GTC sale? It doesn't make much sense does it?
In game items/isk/plex are the quickest, most cost effective way I have to reward my users.
-RMT-
I agree this is a grey area and the language could be clearer, BUT looking at the EULA... the current system I, and other sites, employ DOES seem to be within the rules. It would be nice to have some clearer language though...
We implemented our "Credit for GTC Purchase" program for a couple of reasons. 1) We had to, to be competitive with other sites. 2) There is really no other "thing" that we can offer as incentives to our users to purchase time codes from us.
We will continue to offer the credits for GTC purchases. Unless it becomes specifically forbidden by a change in language in the EULA, or we are asked to stop by the owners of the game. |

Shai 'Hulud
90
|
Posted - 2013.10.16 23:57:00 -
[825] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular.
-Gifts- CCP is a business. The sole purpose of a business is to make money. If CCP wants to give gifts to users that are helping them be profitable, and in turn keep churning out content for YOU, then that's their prerogative. I would imagine if YOU sold thousands upon thousands of GTC's, as Somer has done, then you would get some tasty gifts as well. What's next? A rage post about how CCP "secretly" gave all their sales staff a Christmas bonus last year, and didn't run it by the community first? Common guys, let's get some perspective here.
This is about Money. Actual real money. This is not little league where we don't keep score and everyone is a winner. This is business. Want free stuff? Spend 6 months of your life coding a fan site, another 6 months getting users to sign up, then monetize it by selling GTC's and then spend the rest of your time, updating and maintaining it.
Sounds like a lot of work for a few free space pixels doesn't it?
-Prizes-
I would love some stuff to give away to my users from CCP, but Out of Game Items just wont work.
80% of my users won't even enter an email address (so they can reset their passwords automatically) Now you expect them to give their names and addresses? Not to mention the time I would have to spend to package and ship them a t-shirt? Spending 10 dollars in time, materials, and shipping all for what? A 2 dollar piece of a GTC sale? It doesn't make much sense does it?
In game items/isk/plex are the quickest, most cost effective way I have to reward my users.
-RMT-
I agree this is a grey area and the language could be clearer, BUT looking at the EULA... the current system I, and other sites, employ DOES seem to be within the rules. It would be nice to have some clearer language though...
We implemented our "Credit for GTC Purchase" program for a couple of reasons. 1) We had to, to be competitive with other sites. 2) There is really no other "thing" that we can offer as incentives to our users to purchase time codes from us.
We will continue to offer the credits for GTC purchases. Unless it becomes specifically forbidden by a change in language in the EULA, or we are asked to stop by the owners of the game. You are trading ISK for cash. That's not RMT how? All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Frying Doom
2614
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:01:00 -
[826] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular. The one thing I will say is that as an eve site you failed to mention your bias in your posting, other than your RMT activities, most, if not all of the bloggers who have commented on this have clearly stated what items they have received from CCP, so as to give readers of their articles and posts a clear idea of their level of bias. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
288
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:06:00 -
[827] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular.
-Gifts- CCP is a business. The sole purpose of a business is to make money. If CCP wants to give gifts to users that are helping them be profitable, and in turn keep churning out content for YOU, then that's their prerogative. I would imagine if YOU sold thousands upon thousands of GTC's, as Somer has done, then you would get some tasty gifts as well. What's next? A rage post about how CCP "secretly" gave all their sales staff a Christmas bonus last year, and didn't run it by the community first? Common guys, let's get some perspective here.
This is about Money. Actual real money. This is not little league where we don't keep score and everyone is a winner. This is business. Want free stuff? Spend 6 months of your life coding a fan site, another 6 months getting users to sign up, then monetize it by selling GTC's and then spend the rest of your time, updating and maintaining it.
Sounds like a lot of work for a few free space pixels doesn't it?
-Prizes-
I would love some stuff to give away to my users from CCP, but Out of Game Items just wont work.
80% of my users won't even enter an email address (so they can reset their passwords automatically) Now you expect them to give their names and addresses? Not to mention the time I would have to spend to package and ship them a t-shirt? Spending 10 dollars in time, materials, and shipping all for what? A 2 dollar piece of a GTC sale? It doesn't make much sense does it?
In game items/isk/plex are the quickest, most cost effective way I have to reward my users.
-RMT-
I agree this is a grey area and the language could be clearer, BUT looking at the EULA... the current system I, and other sites, employ DOES seem to be within the rules. It would be nice to have some clearer language though...
We implemented our "Credit for GTC Purchase" program for a couple of reasons. 1) We had to, to be competitive with other sites. 2) There is really no other "thing" that we can offer as incentives to our users to purchase time codes from us.
We will continue to offer the credits for GTC purchases. Unless it becomes specifically forbidden by a change in language in the EULA, or we are asked to stop by the owners of the game.
I love it please keep posting. By the way your welcome for the increase in traffic will you read this post for me https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241&find=unread . I am looking for a business partner. |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:08:00 -
[828] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote: You are trading ISK for cash. That's not RMT how?
I can see from the whole 9 seconds it took you to read my post, and reply to it that you have no interest in a debate and just want to tell me how wrong I am.
As I said, the EULA could use some clearer language in regards to this.
|

Frying Doom
2615
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:11:00 -
[829] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote: You are trading ISK for cash. That's not RMT how?
I can see from the whole 9 seconds it took you to read my post, and reply to it that you have no interest in a debate and just want to tell me how wrong I am. As I said, the EULA could use some clearer language in regards to this. Maybe you could post the relevant part of the EULA and tell us how you are not in breach of it? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
92
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:12:00 -
[830] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor What?...
If your personal opinion is that of Argus Sorn, why the **** do you need a poll? Do you have no idea how a representative government works? You were elected to use your good judgement and perspective to represent EVE players, not to administer polls. If polls were the answer, we wouldn't need you.
So what exactly is your role if we are going the direct democracy route?
As many have said, polls can be made to be intentionally misleading without much effort. It doesn't require a political science degree.
In times like this you guys should be the ones raging at CCP. Grow a pair and do your ******* job. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
144
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:13:00 -
[831] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote: What?...
If your personal opinion is that of Argus Sorn, why the **** do you need a poll? Do you have no idea how a representative government works? You were elected to use your good judgement and perspective to represent EVE players, not to administer polls. If polls were the answer, we wouldn't need you.
So what exactly is your role if we are going the direct democracy route?
As many have said, polls can be made to be intentionally misleading without much effort. It doesn't require a political science degree.
In times like this you guys should be the ones raging at CCP. Grow a pair and do your ******* job.
it's ok bro, he's as upset as we are  |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:15:00 -
[832] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular. The one thing I will say is that as an eve site you failed to mention your bias in your posting, other than your RMT activities, most, if not all of the bloggers who have commented on this have clearly stated what items they have received from CCP, so as to give readers of their articles and posts a clear idea of their level of bias.
Edited my post for you....also, just because I own an eve lotto site, doesn't make me biased. I am a fully grown human capable of changing my views based on intelligent discussion and reasoning. Calling one biased means I will never change my opinion. This is not the case, and as I have said, If CCP asks, or the EULA changes I will fully comply with the new rules. |

Frying Doom
2615
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:22:00 -
[833] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular. The one thing I will say is that as an eve site you failed to mention your bias in your posting, other than your RMT activities, most, if not all of the bloggers who have commented on this have clearly stated what items they have received from CCP, so as to give readers of their articles and posts a clear idea of their level of bias. Edited my post for you....also, just because I own an eve lotto site, doesn't make me biased. I am a fully grown human capable of changing my views based on intelligent discussion and reasoning. Calling one biased means I will never change my opinion. This is not the case, and as I have said, If CCP asks, or the EULA changes I will fully comply with the new rules. Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
It is a means of indicating to your audience that your objectivity may be altered from a base norm. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
92
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:23:00 -
[834] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote: You are trading ISK for cash. That's not RMT how?
I can see from the whole 9 seconds it took you to read my post, and reply to it that you have no interest in a debate and just want to tell me how wrong I am. As I said, the EULA could use some clearer language in regards to this.
Jimmy Farrere wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/support/policies/third-party-policies/ Quote: Real money trading Trading in-game items for real-life currency or services is NOT allowed under any circumstances.
Any circumstances CCP? Pretty clelar imo...
And I suspect the "9 seconds" thing is a bug or due to your edit. I read your whole post, and it took me more than 9 seconds. Check the timestamps here: http://www.eve-search.com/thread/285492-1/page/28#824 All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Shai 'Hulud
92
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:25:00 -
[835] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Edited my post for you....also, just because I own an eve lotto site, doesn't make me biased. I am a fully grown human capable of changing my views based on intelligent discussion and reasoning. Calling one biased means I will never change my opinion. This is not the case, and as I have said, If CCP asks, or the EULA changes I will fully comply with the new rules. Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
It is a means of indicating to your audience that your objectivity may be altered from a base norm.[/quote] I'm not sure he really needed to declare the bias since it was obvious. You declare biases that are not immediately apparent. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Frying Doom
2616
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:30:00 -
[836] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
It is a means of indicating to your audience that your objectivity may be altered from a base norm. I'm not sure he really needed to declare the bias since it was obvious. You declare biases that are not immediately apparent. In this matter the differing levels of bias are huge from some sites receiving 1 free account to some for profits sites receiving a lot more and some receiving hundreds of billions of isk in gifts, so I think site operators stating their bias is very necessary. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
291
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:34:00 -
[837] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:Was getting an increase in traffic from forums.eveonline.com, and I thought I would come and see what all the fuss was about. Wow, this is a little over the top.... and this response will most likely not be popular. The one thing I will say is that as an eve site you failed to mention your bias in your posting, other than your RMT activities, most, if not all of the bloggers who have commented on this have clearly stated what items they have received from CCP, so as to give readers of their articles and posts a clear idea of their level of bias. Edited my post for you....also, just because I own an eve lotto site, doesn't make me biased. I am a fully grown human capable of changing my views based on intelligent discussion and reasoning. Calling one biased means I will never change my opinion. This is not the case, and as I have said, If CCP asks, or the EULA changes I will fully comply with the new rules.
Wait new rules so CCP has told you it was ok to run this site????? What are the current rules please I want to read them. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3131
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:35:00 -
[838] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:1) Is this going to be a blind survey to the community or are CCP going to explain in the survey why it exists? 2) Is the community sites and for profit sites part of the survey going to be separated 3) Will the surveys be put up for comment before they go out. The answers are that:
1) the level of explanation accompanying the surveys has not been discussed in detail. If you have opinions about that, or suggestions, I would like to hear them.
2) There are currently going to be two surveys, one about appropriate ways CCP can reward 3rd-party sites, and one about what business practices are appropriate for 3rd-party sites.
3) The original idea was just to do the business practices survey, and the question list was developed by CSM. We made it clear in the meeting that while we would be happy to add appropriate questions suggested by CCP (just as we have asked for input from the community in this thread), this is a CSM initiative. During our meeting with CCP Community, the idea of investigating the issue of appropriate rewards was raised, and it was decided this was best done with separate surveys, so that each could be more focused and detailed. The framework for that survey was developed by CSM and has been posted on the internal forums for comment.
The sample questions in my post came from those lists, but we do not intend to publish them before the survey goes live. We want to hear what you think are the important questions to ask without biasing your feedback.
In particular, give us sequences of statements that go from something that is (in your opinion) clearly OK to something that is clearly BAD, in tiny little steps. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Frying Doom
2618
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:47:00 -
[839] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The answers are that:
1) the level of explanation accompanying the surveys has not been discussed in detail. If you have opinions about that, or suggestions, I would like to hear them.
I would like a blurb on the top relating truthfully what has transpired eg. gold magnates, 30 scorpions, the lack of transparency ect. to be put especially on the CCP survey as the reason for the survey will make people think harder before answering the survey
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:2) There are currently going to be two surveys, one about appropriate ways CCP can reward 3rd-party sites, and one about what business practices are appropriate for 3rd-party sites. It might be a cultural thing but 3rd party to me means you are lumping community and for profit sites together. They need to be seperate on the survey, otherwise the survey is pointless.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:3) The original idea was just to do the business practices survey, and the question list was developed by CSM. We made it clear in the meeting that while we would be happy to add appropriate questions suggested by CCP (just as we have asked for input from the community in this thread), this is a CSM initiative. During our meeting with CCP Community, the idea of investigating the issue of appropriate rewards was raised, and it was decided this was best done with separate surveys, so that each could be more focused and detailed. The framework for that survey was developed by CSM and has been posted on the internal forums for comment.
The sample questions in my post came from those lists, but we do not intend to publish them before the survey goes live. We want to hear what you think are the important questions to ask without biasing your feedback.
In particular, give us sequences of statements that go from something that is (in your opinion) clearly OK to something that is clearly BAD, in tiny little steps. I will for a change take my time and present my version of good to bad with little steps in the next few days. but primarily focusing on separating the community and the for profit sites.
The other are I am curious on you keep saying business models/practices, are you surveying whether the community feels the current RMT is acceptable? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
295
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:51:00 -
[840] - Quote
http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_guide.jsp EVE is Rated TEEN.
I am now going to contact the ERSB and see if buying a GTC for real money and then gambling with credits that are redeemable for in game stuff would be a violation. By the way thanks for making me go read all this stuff. I never knew.
Simulated Gambling - Player can gamble without betting or wagering real cash or currency
Since money and isk can be related this might be a grey area also. I paid for trips with plex and people can gamble on Somer with plex interesting seems to be real money to me |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
146
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 00:52:00 -
[841] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:http://www.esrb.org/ratings/ratings_guide.jsp EVE is Rated TEEN.
I am now going to contact the ERSB and see if buying a GTC for real money and then gambling with credits that are redeemable for in game stuff would be a violation. By the way thanks for making me go read all this stuff. I never knew.
Simulated Gambling - Player can gamble without betting or wagering real cash or currency
Since money and isk can be related this might be a grey area also. I paid for trips with plex and people can gamble on Somer with plex interesting seems to be real money to me to me it seems that this is why their answer is going to take months.
they have already decided they are going to continue to back Somer and give them stuff.
that's why their lawyers need time to go through the legalese. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
297
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:01:00 -
[842] - Quote
you would think CCP would have a consumer group they could bounce these ideas off of. They might even have a risk management or a group of lawyers hell someone to step in and stop this bad business decision. Well no worries they are all on there way to Vegas right now and my friends trebor is left fending off the dogs.
Trebor I needed a hero not a politician sorry my friend. I am hoping at some point you get on the right side of this fight.
By the way I had another CSM member tell me "well you and I will not see eye to eye friend" "but tbh i think its great anyone who gets creative in this game" <---- meaning somer blink
I guess he is right Somer is creative in how they went about getting CCP to over look there blink credits for cash program. |

Frying Doom
2620
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:08:00 -
[843] - Quote
While the CSMs actions in this crisis were well less than stellar to start with.
I must admit I have had some faith restored well in Trebor anyway for standing up and talking to us.
I will admit I don't believe us protesting by being quiet is the best advice I have ever heard but at least he stood up to the firing squad.
And lets face it everyone knows how much I love Trebor. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
99
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:11:00 -
[844] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: And lets face it everyone knows how much I love Trebor.
That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away" |

Frying Doom
2622
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:21:00 -
[845] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Frying Doom wrote: And lets face it everyone knows how much I love Trebor.
That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away" I am far from satisfied with his shut up and go away response. I have never heard of a successful protest where the people shut up and went away. Some protests have literally gone on for decades with the people not shutting up and going away.
What I was saying was that he showed courage to actually face this crowd unlike others who are MIA or just post and run.
Oh and for bias, my community service for he last 3 years has been trying like hell to try and make sure Trebor was not elected. This is the first time I was ever glad I failed. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Herr Kutz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:24:00 -
[846] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor
I thoroughly look forward to seeing the results of these polls - particularly if it actually engages the non-forum dwellers so that they can have their say without certain groups shouting them down.
I see it going one of three ways -
1: Mostly forumites respond, CCP accept those results as "the general consensus" and act based on that
2: Mostly forumites respond, but as that is only a small selection of the game's population, CCP assume that those not responding don't care/have a problem with what's happened and act based on that
3: The response is mixed between both forumites and non-forumites and CCP get a more accurate result and act on that.
I hope for 3, but expect 1.
My question to CCP/the CSM is how are you going to get option 3 rather than have the results skewed towards 1 or 2? |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
300
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:30:00 -
[847] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Frying Doom wrote: And lets face it everyone knows how much I love Trebor.
That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away"
You missed the satire in his response |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
101
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:36:00 -
[848] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: What I was saying was that he showed courage to actually face this crowd unlike others who are MIA or just post and run.
I'll agree there have certainly been worse CSM responses
Malcanis wrote: *sips mojito
|

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
8
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:44:00 -
[849] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Good one... lets keep it civil shall we?
Frying Doom wrote: Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
Im not a journalist....and I did edit my original post for you.
Frying Doom wrote: Any way the EULA
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. I see very little grey in this myself even if you use the extra named credit between the purchase of GTC and turning it into isk, you are still transferring in game content via any other means. Adding in an extra layer does not mean anything at all, it is very much still RMT.
As I stated multiple times previously... I AGREE THE LANGUAGE COULD BE MORE CLEAR...
As it stands now... I don't sell isk for money.... I don't even sell time codes. I point users to a certified reseller that does, in turn I receive a small percentage of each time code sold, which doesn't even cover my costs.
As an incentive to get my users to purchase through the certified reseller of my choice, I offer them credits that are good for playing games on my website. Playing the games is not a guarantee of ISK, it is possible (however unlikely) that a user could purchase 1 ticket per day and not win anything.
I think if I was actually the Reseller AND I gave ACTUAL ISK bonuses to players that bought time codes from me, then there would be a EULA violation. However, this is not the case.
Once again, If the language changes...and the program is deemed a violation, I would comply with the new changes.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
303
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:47:00 -
[850] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Sal Landry wrote:Frying Doom wrote: And lets face it everyone knows how much I love Trebor.
That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away" You missed the satire in his response
the fact I have got frying doom to like Trebor is making me feel like "Moses". Even tho now that these two are working together I feel I am to late to get a ground swell. Or is it the goons are looking to take full advantage of this new CCP policy and cash out and go play star Cit  |
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
303
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:49:00 -
[851] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Good one... lets keep it civil shall we? Frying Doom wrote: Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
Im not a journalist....and I did edit my original post for you. Frying Doom wrote: Any way the EULA
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. I see very little grey in this myself even if you use the extra named credit between the purchase of GTC and turning it into isk, you are still transferring in game content via any other means. Adding in an extra layer does not mean anything at all, it is very much still RMT.
As I stated multiple times previously... I AGREE THE LANGUAGE COULD BE MORE CLEAR... As it stands now... I don't sell isk for money.... I don't even sell time codes. I point users to a certified reseller that does, in turn I receive a small percentage of each time code sold, which doesn't even cover my costs. As an incentive to get my users to purchase through the certified reseller of my choice, I offer them credits that are good for playing games on my website. Playing the games is not a guarantee of ISK, it is possible (however unlikely) that a user could purchase 1 ticket per day and not win anything. I think if I was actually the Reseller AND I gave ACTUAL ISK bonuses to players that bought time codes from me, then there would be a EULA violation. However, this is not the case. Once again, If the language changes...and the program is deemed a violation, I would comply with the new changes.
if you want my respect stop giving free isk for GTC sales. Until that you are no different and cover my cost that is laughable |

Shai 'Hulud
93
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:51:00 -
[852] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
Shai 'Hulud wrote:The survey is designed to replace this thread. In a survey they have final say over the questions, and thus over the possible results. So I nailed it 
Why the hell did they ask for our opinions here if they are just going to ignore them? How many threads, posts and individual opinions are there on this issue now? Aside from a few trolls and ignoramuses, I see a rather unanimous response to this issue.
It seems the data hunt will continue until data is found to defend their position. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
679
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:53:00 -
[853] - Quote
We are planning on doing two surveys so that each can focus on one aspect of the can of worms that has been opened. Also so we do not create some monstrous 45 minute wall of text nobody has the endurance for.
The surveys will likely be posted or linked in the forums but CCP may also choose to run a parallel one similar to customer surveys they do, now and again, to get opinions from beyond the forums. This is a good idea because a self selected sample for a survey always makes the results questionable although at times such methodology is unavoidable.
There will be 'grey area' choices because not everything is black and white.
I do look forward to seeing both the survey and your opinions on it.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3132
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 01:53:00 -
[854] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away" I would love for you to explain exactly what it was in my post that in any way said "shut up and go away". If that is what you read from it, then you are so blinded with rage that nothing I say will get through your perceptual filters.
I merely pointed out that repeated angry posts saying the same thing were counterproductive. Nobody likes being yelled at.
I'm going to take my own advice and not belabor this particular point any further. Instead, I will devote my time to answering the concerns of the constructive posters in this thread, such as Frying Doom. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
308
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:03:00 -
[855] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Sal Landry wrote:That's the only explanation I can see for why you'd be satisfied with his response of basically "shut up and go away" I would love for you to explain exactly what it was in my post that in any way said "shut up and go away". If that is what you read from it, then you are so blinded with rage that nothing I say will get through your perceptual filters. I merely pointed out that repeated angry posts saying the same thing were counterproductive. Nobody likes being yelled at. I'm going to take my own advice and not belabor this particular point any further. Instead, I will devote my time to answering the concerns of the constructive posters in this thread, such as Frying Doom.
Ok now that is satire at its best. Wait while I swallow what I just threw up. |

Frying Doom
2627
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:03:00 -
[856] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Good one... lets keep it civil shall we? Frying Doom wrote: Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
Im not a journalist....and I did edit my original post for you. Frying Doom wrote: Any way the EULA
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. I see very little grey in this myself even if you use the extra named credit between the purchase of GTC and turning it into isk, you are still transferring in game content via any other means. Adding in an extra layer does not mean anything at all, it is very much still RMT.
As I stated multiple times previously... I AGREE THE LANGUAGE COULD BE MORE CLEAR... As it stands now... I don't sell isk for money.... I don't even sell time codes. I point users to a certified reseller that does, in turn I receive a small percentage of each time code sold, which doesn't even cover my costs. As an incentive to get my users to purchase through the certified reseller of my choice, I offer them credits that are good for playing games on my website. Playing the games is not a guarantee of ISK, it is possible (however unlikely) that a user could purchase 1 ticket per day and not win anything. I think if I was actually the Reseller AND I gave ACTUAL ISK bonuses to players that bought time codes from me, then there would be a EULA violation. However, this is not the case. Once again, If the language changes...and the program is deemed a violation, I would comply with the new changes. I was keeping it civil, I presumed your confusion over the words bias and biased came from English as a second language.
No you are not a journalist, you are someone who runs a for profit site and may or may not have received gifts for your self or your customers from CCP. The size and amount of those gifts is a bias, the fact you have stated you run a lottery site is not showing your bias, just your potential bias. To actually state your bias you would have to list what you and your site have received as gifts from CCP.
As to the RMT actually the language is quiet clear. Your site and others receive real life money in exchange for GTC(which is perfectly fine and above board) and fake isk that is convertible with a percentage loss into ingame isk(not perfectly fine and is RMT). What is the difference between you receiving cash and giving fake isk out then with a reduction converting that into real isk and me selling a pen with 1.2 billion free pen isks convertible into 1 billion in game isks? Nothing at all adding a step still makes it RMT and is covered in the EULA under other means.
As to the fact you spent 6 months setting up and coding your site, well you are a business. You should not need or require gifts from CCP to run your business.
The EULA language does not need to change, the rules just need to be enforced, properly rather than the current selective approach.
Why should your need for a business and its profits or lack there of effect the sand box. You did not set up your site for the good of the community, you set it up for the good of your self. Some people in this game have spent a lot longer than 6 months doing things for the community and not received anything at all. They do not need it to run their various help sites, charities, video blogs, ect.. why should you deserve it? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4409
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:04:00 -
[857] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Please have patience with a slowpoke.
Why is this going to not be resolved quickly?
RMT => instant perma ban.
It does not get any quicker nor easier than that, doesn't it?
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
370
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:04:00 -
[858] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Ok apparently english is not your primary language so
Good one... lets keep it civil shall we? Frying Doom wrote: Bias refers to any goods or service you have received from an individual or corporation that may or may not alter your perspective. When a journalist states their bias, it might include such things as stocks they own in a company or the fact that the politician they are interviewing cost them their last job.
Im not a journalist....and I did edit my original post for you. Frying Doom wrote: Any way the EULA
B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game. I see very little grey in this myself even if you use the extra named credit between the purchase of GTC and turning it into isk, you are still transferring in game content via any other means. Adding in an extra layer does not mean anything at all, it is very much still RMT.
As I stated multiple times previously... I AGREE THE LANGUAGE COULD BE MORE CLEAR... As it stands now... I don't sell isk for money.... I don't even sell time codes. I point users to a certified reseller that does, in turn I receive a small percentage of each time code sold, which doesn't even cover my costs. As an incentive to get my users to purchase through the certified reseller of my choice, I offer them credits that are good for playing games on my website. Playing the games is not a guarantee of ISK, it is possible (however unlikely) that a user could purchase 1 ticket per day and not win anything. I think if I was actually the Reseller AND I gave ACTUAL ISK bonuses to players that bought time codes from me, then there would be a EULA violation. However, this is not the case. Once again, If the language changes...and the program is deemed a violation, I would comply with the new changes. if you want my respect stop giving free isk for GTC sales. Until that you are no different and cover my cost that is laughable
Frying, there is no chance FOR YOU. You are selling isk for cash everytime someone bids on one of your auctions with "bonus isk". You got cash, they got bonus isk, they contribute it toward the sale of the 'auction'.
No matter WHO WINS, you get the cash.
That's RMT. There is no gray area here. You engage in RMT, just like SOMERblink. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
150
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:05:00 -
[859] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote: I don't sell isk for money.... I don't even sell time codes. I point users to a certified reseller that does, in turn I receive a small percentage of each time code sold....
As an incentive to get my users to purchase through the certified reseller of my choice, I offer them credits that are good for playing games on my website...
please reread what you just wrote...
looks to me like you're saying you don't sell... directly... and that's about it. |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
308
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:05:00 -
[860] - Quote
Trebor you know iam on coms and just above you come on up and lets enjoy our converting of Frying Doom together. I know we are on opposite sides of this fight as far as process but we can at least toast this great achievement.
|
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
310
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:06:00 -
[861] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:We are planning on doing two surveys so that each can focus on one aspect of the can of worms that has been opened. Also so we do not create some monstrous 45 minute wall of text nobody has the endurance for.
The surveys will likely be posted or linked in the forums but CCP may also choose to run a parallel one similar to customer surveys they do, now and again, to get opinions from beyond the forums. This is a good idea because a self selected sample for a survey always makes the results questionable although at times such methodology is unavoidable.
There will be 'grey area' choices because not everything is black and white.
I do look forward to seeing both the survey and your opinions on it.
m
Are you the guys from RvB?????????? |

Frying Doom
2627
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:09:00 -
[862] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:We are planning on doing two surveys so that each can focus on one aspect of the can of worms that has been opened. Also so we do not create some monstrous 45 minute wall of text nobody has the endurance for.
The surveys will likely be posted or linked in the forums but CCP may also choose to run a parallel one similar to customer surveys they do, now and again, to get opinions from beyond the forums. This is a good idea because a self selected sample for a survey always makes the results questionable although at times such methodology is unavoidable.
There will be 'grey area' choices because not everything is black and white.
I do look forward to seeing both the survey and your opinions on it.
m Could you demonstrate one of these "grey areas" because personally I see no need for grey areas within a survey. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
94
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:09:00 -
[863] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:This is a good idea because a self selected sample for a survey always makes the results questionable although at times such methodology is unavoidable. There are many cases where a self selected sample is desirable, and the only way to ensure the survey is relevant. Who exactly on the CSM has experience in properly constructing a survey such that it actually provides reliable results? All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
374
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:11:00 -
[864] - Quote
There are no grey areas in the RMT side of this.
SOMER and EVE-Games are converting isk and in game material into cash.
That's RMT. Read my explanation of this (it's like post 510 or something).
They may not have even realized it - but they are, and they should stop.
|

Lelira Cirim
EVE University Ivy League
108
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:23:00 -
[865] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:If CCP started selling IW Scorps and SOE ships in the Aurum store the game would sink in a week. Sell me paint jobs for ships I already own for 50 AUR each.  Do not actively tank my patience. |

Shai 'Hulud
98
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:26:00 -
[866] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:This is a good idea because a self selected sample for a survey always makes the results questionable although at times such methodology is unavoidable. There are many cases where a self selected sample is desirable, and the only way to ensure the survey is relevant. Who exactly on the CSM has experience in properly constructing a survey such that it actually provides reliable results? For example:
Polling players who are lacking in knowledge of what has transpired, let alone had time to think the issue over, instantly makes the poll invalid. It's like asking someone who has never played EVE whether they think 0.0 space should have a local channel. Their opinion is useless due to ignorance. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 02:57:00 -
[867] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:SOMER and EVE-Games are converting isk and in game material into cash.
How under-informed and over-opinionated the forums can be staggers, sometimes.
Those two are far, far, far from the only ones doing this.
Other sites that monitize their websites for ISK:
eve-bet - credit for GTC referrals Everalerpalous - credit for GTC referrals Mittens rumor/drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising. EN24 drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising New Eden Club - credit for referrals Win your fortune - credit for referrals Eve hosts - Paying money for server/ts/jabber space, charging users isk to use that space
Websites monitizing to cover server costs has been accepted for ages.
Hell, Battleclinic is even a full-blown reseller. Chribba has more advertisements on his sites than the average city bus.
And so on.
All those 3rd party sites you all love so much - they aren't free to run. |

Frying Doom
2628
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:04:00 -
[868] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:SOMER and EVE-Games are converting isk and in game material into cash. How under-informed and over-opinionated the forums can be staggers, sometimes. Those two are far, far, far from the only ones doing this. Other sites that monitize their websites for ISK: eve-bet - credit for GTC referrals Everalerpalous - credit for GTC referrals Mittens rumor/drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising. EN24 drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising New Eden Club - credit for referrals Win your fortune - credit for referrals Eve hosts - Paying money for server/ts/jabber space, charging users isk to use that space Websites monitizing to cover server costs has been accepted for ages. Hell, Battleclinic is even a full-blown reseller. Chribba has more advertisements on his sites than the average city bus. And so on. All those 3rd party sites you all love so much - they aren't free to run. Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:08:00 -
[869] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites.
Let me ELI5 for you - Person A pays RL cash for a TS server. Person B gives ISK to person A to use a TS server. Person A just traded cash for ISK.
Or:
Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
377
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:17:00 -
[870] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:SOMER and EVE-Games are converting isk and in game material into cash. How under-informed and over-opinionated the forums can be staggers, sometimes. Those two are far, far, far from the only ones doing this. Other sites that monitize their websites for ISK: eve-bet - credit for GTC referrals Everalerpalous - credit for GTC referrals Mittens rumor/drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising. EN24 drama site - isk for articles, cash for advertising New Eden Club - credit for referrals Win your fortune - credit for referrals Eve hosts - Paying money for server/ts/jabber space, charging users isk to use that space Websites monitizing to cover server costs has been accepted for ages. Hell, Battleclinic is even a full-blown reseller. Chribba has more advertisements on his sites than the average city bus. And so on. All those 3rd party sites you all love so much - they aren't free to run.
1) I never said they were the only ones.
2) Some of your examples are not RMT at all. To be RMT, isk must be converted into real dollars. Trading items, webspace, articles, etc. for isk is not the same thing - and the differences are subtle, but it is the monetization of the in game currency that is the villain here. In other words, cash for isk and isk for cash are different and have different impacts on the economy in game. And CCP should do what they can to prevent that. |
|

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:18:00 -
[871] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: Trading items, webspace, articles, etc. for isk is not the same thing.
If I pay cash for webspace then charge ISK for that webspace, how have I not converted cash into ISK?
If I pay ISK for people to draw advertising views, then accept cash for those advertisements, how have I not converted ISK to cash? |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
377
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:20:00 -
[872] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Argus Sorn wrote: Trading items, webspace, articles, etc. for isk is not the same thing. If I pay cash for webspace then charge ISK for that webspace, how have I not converted cash into ISK?
The heart of RMT is the conversion of in game currency to cash. It is what provides the incentives for farming and inflation.
|

Frying Doom
2628
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:20:00 -
[873] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites. Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. So person B spends money on a server, programs it ect and pay out for isk as well and is guaranteed isk from advertising from a completely separate party?
See they are not connected, the person who pays out the isk is not guaranteed to receive money from yet another party.
RMT is put money in get isk/items out they are connected events. Advertising is not a connected event. There is a big difference between a site that supports the community and a site that is primarily there as a business. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:22:00 -
[874] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites. Let me ELI5 for you - Person A pays RL cash for a TS server. Person B gives ISK to person A to use a TS server. Person A just traded cash for ISK. Or: Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. The difference is that it has been legal to pay ISK for game related services such as those you listed for a long time (even if they cost the provider real $). The SOMER model uses ISK as an incentive to buy gtc's through them. You are not paying ISK for a game related service, as this is completely separate from the gambling site function. SOMER could almost as effectively just have a site with nothing but the link to buy the GTC's. So in this case they are not buying a game related service with ISK (legal), they are directly buying cash with ISK.
In your first example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of TS server.
In your second example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of writing an article about something in the game. Basically RP of a journalist charging for their services. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:22:00 -
[875] - Quote
The only difference I see in what you're protesting and what you're white-knighting is that the white-knighting version is done by the person who told you to be upset about the protesting version. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
377
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:23:00 -
[876] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:The only difference I see in what you're protesting and what you're white-knighting is that the white-knighting version is done by the person who told you to be upset about the protesting version.
It may be the only difference you see.
That does not mean it's the only difference. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:26:00 -
[877] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:EDIT: I OWN AN EVE LOTTO SITE https://eve-games.net-RMT-I agree this is a grey area and the language could be clearer, BUT looking at the EULA... the current system I, and other sites, employ DOES seem to be within the rules. It would be nice to have some clearer language though... We implemented our "Credit for GTC Purchase" program for a couple of reasons. 1) We had to, to be competitive with other sites. 2) There is really no other "thing" that we can offer as incentives to our users to purchase time codes from us. We will continue to offer the credits for GTC purchases. Unless it becomes specifically forbidden by a change in language in the EULA, or we are asked to stop by the owners of the game.
Well, that came as a surprise to me as I was not aware that other GTC reseller sites besides Somer Blink's were offering isk bonuses for the GTC purchases. It seems CCP has given us the answer that we are looking for although we had not seen it yet.
The EULA section 6 paragraph B (Conduct - Selling Items and Objects) is clear and in my opinion this is not a matter of "grey areas" or "overshadowed language", but rather a matter of arbitrary interpretation by those who made the rules and have the power to enforce, change or neglect them. One could argue about different interpretations of this specific part of the rules of conduct and defend the legitimacy of the use the isk tokens to reward GTC purchasers, as they are not sold directly for real money but rather "gifted" as a reward through the in-game trading mechanism, but the same could be said about the actions of player's who engaged in other "forms of RMT" and whose accounts are banned everyday by Team Security, since all the character isk or PLEX transactions are necessarily done in-game aswell, and not automatically connected to real money, unless CCP presumes they are.
Aknowledging the use of isk tokens to reward the GTC purchasers through Somer Blink, EVE-GAMES.NET and other websites, CCP has apparently allowed everyone to set up their own GTC resale referral system+isk token reward.
Farmer Pigz REJOICE \o/ Time to cash those fat loads of isk into real money too  |

Frying Doom
2628
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:26:00 -
[878] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:The only difference I see in what you're protesting and what you're white-knighting is that the white-knighting version is done by the person who told you to be upset about the protesting version. So what can I get out of somer blink without giving them isk or buying GTC, compare this to what I can get from DOTLAN without giving them isk or cash. Then tell me they are the same. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:27:00 -
[879] - Quote
Both scenarios are using ISK to create content on a website that has monitization features to offset server costs. In both scenarios, without the ISK-generated content, the monitization feature wouldn't be used.
That you like one type of content or dislike a different type is irrelevant to whether it's sanctioned behavior or not.
But by all means - carry on with your crusade. I'm reminded why it's better to play the game than the play the forums once again. |

Frying Doom
2628
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:34:00 -
[880] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Both scenarios are using ISK to create content on a website that has monitization features to offset server costs. In both scenarios, without the ISK-generated content, the monitization feature wouldn't be used.
That you like one type of content or dislike a different type is irrelevant to whether it's sanctioned behavior or not.
But by all means - carry on with your crusade. I'm reminded why it's better to play the game than the play the forums once again. You missed that one I cannot use without giving isk or cash, while the other I have no need to give isk or cash to use.
Rather a big difference. One is for the community the other is set-up specificly for the benefit of the site owner. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Shai 'Hulud
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:39:00 -
[881] - Quote
Ethan Snow wrote:Both scenarios are using ISK to create content on a website that has monitization features to offset server costs. In both scenarios, without the ISK-generated content, the monitization feature wouldn't be used.
That you like one type of content or dislike a different type is irrelevant to whether it's sanctioned behavior or not.
But by all means - carry on with your crusade. I'm reminded why it's better to play the game than the play the forums once again. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6371&find=unread "*This has been extended to include Characters, EVE Time Cards (ETCs), website hosting and voice chat services."
Every example you gave that is not the SOMER model of RMT is explicitly allowed by CCP rules. And CCP has no authority to tell 3rd party sites they cannot have advertisements - they would have no means to enforce such. They're not the internet police. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Ethan Snow
Eve Flash Executive Apotheosis
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:41:00 -
[882] - Quote
I didn't miss it. It's irrelevant.
To repeat: That you dislike one type of content has no baring on whether or not it's sanctioned behavior.
Now if you want to argue that the types of content that you personally don't enjoy shouldn't be allowed to offset server costs, but content that you personally do enjoy should be allowed to - by all means, you can do that. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2701
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:48:00 -
[883] - Quote
I think the answer is simple. Really simple.
- There are rules that apply to CCP employees that prevent them from interfering with the game.
- Those rules should now simply be applied to SOMER. He is in effect a CCP employee.
Fixed.
You're welcome, internet.
Don't drink and fly expensive spaceships. Also: don't drink, fly expensive spaceships, and just start shooting random people at Jita 4-4. That's all I know about EvE. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
679
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 03:55:00 -
[884] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Ethan Snow wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites. Let me ELI5 for you - Person A pays RL cash for a TS server. Person B gives ISK to person A to use a TS server. Person A just traded cash for ISK. Or: Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. The difference is that it has been legal to pay ISK for game related services such as those you listed for a long time (even if they cost the provider real $). The SOMER model uses ISK as an incentive to buy gtc's through them. You are not paying ISK for a game related service, as this is completely separate from the gambling site function. SOMER could almost as effectively just have a site with nothing but the link to buy the GTC's. So in this case they are not buying a game related service with ISK (legal), they are directly buying cash with ISK. In your first example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of TS server. In your second example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of writing an article about something in the game. Basically RP of a journalist charging for their services.
You guys were asking for grey areas?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Frying Doom
2629
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:01:00 -
[885] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Ethan Snow wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites. Let me ELI5 for you - Person A pays RL cash for a TS server. Person B gives ISK to person A to use a TS server. Person A just traded cash for ISK. Or: Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. The difference is that it has been legal to pay ISK for game related services such as those you listed for a long time (even if they cost the provider real $). The SOMER model uses ISK as an incentive to buy gtc's through them. You are not paying ISK for a game related service, as this is completely separate from the gambling site function. SOMER could almost as effectively just have a site with nothing but the link to buy the GTC's. So in this case they are not buying a game related service with ISK (legal), they are directly buying cash with ISK. In your first example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of TS server. In your second example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of writing an article about something in the game. Basically RP of a journalist charging for their services. You guys were asking for grey areas? m The area is only grey for the troll
A service site does not require the expenditure of cash or isk to use, they may do that for costs but it is not required. A for profit site requires the of cash or isk to use or access a large part of the site. And RMT is converting cash to isk and visa versa not the possibility.
Grey areas on the survey as in should gifts be given to for profit sites for prizes. The answer is NO, see no grey at all. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
679
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:12:00 -
[886] - Quote
Frying, the point is that
Quote:Grey areas on the survey as in should gifts be given to for profit sites for prizes. The answer is NO, see no grey at all.
YOU not seeing grey areas is a factor of your perspective, others see things differently and therein lies the shadowy boundary rules. The grey.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:16:00 -
[887] - Quote
Grey Areas - They're only Grey as long as CCP wants them to be. |

Frying Doom
2630
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:17:00 -
[888] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Frying, the point is that Quote:Grey areas on the survey as in should gifts be given to for profit sites for prizes. The answer is NO, see no grey at all. YOU not seeing grey areas is a factor of your perspective, others see things differently and therein lies the shadowy boundary rules. The grey. m That was I was asking for an example of the survey that would result in a grey area but thinking about it, it might be my interpretation of the words "grey area" I can see a use for the word by some people "sometimes".
For example "Should we give hookers to mainstream press representatives when we are trying to get a good review:" Sometimes. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:19:00 -
[889] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Shai 'Hulud wrote:Ethan Snow wrote:Frying Doom wrote: Besides the approved buy GTC for cash, which of these sites are put RL money in, get isk out? after all that is what Real Money Trading is all about? paying for a service in isk or a completely separate advertising is ok, as they are not swapping cash for isk.
All of the listed examples monitize their sites. Let me ELI5 for you - Person A pays RL cash for a TS server. Person B gives ISK to person A to use a TS server. Person A just traded cash for ISK. Or: Person A writes a rumor article. Person B gives person A isk. Person B sells advertising space for RL cash on the article. Person B just traded ISK for cash. The difference is that it has been legal to pay ISK for game related services such as those you listed for a long time (even if they cost the provider real $). The SOMER model uses ISK as an incentive to buy gtc's through them. You are not paying ISK for a game related service, as this is completely separate from the gambling site function. SOMER could almost as effectively just have a site with nothing but the link to buy the GTC's. So in this case they are not buying a game related service with ISK (legal), they are directly buying cash with ISK. In your first example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of TS server. In your second example ISK is exchanged for the game related service of writing an article about something in the game. Basically RP of a journalist charging for their services. You guys were asking for grey areas? m https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6371&find=unread
CCP Spitfire wrote:*This has been extended to include Characters, EVE Time Cards (ETCs), website hosting and voice chat services. Note: this is in reference to selling game time on the forum, where one player buys the time from CCP and sells it to another player for ISK. This scenario does not allow either player to convert ISK to cash (RMT).
To be clear, I have only claimed that it is a rules violation. But if you want my opinion, it's just a dumb way to allow RMT. Once you cross that line you should just allow it straight out, or it is just RMT for the a select few. Just do a clean real money tax on RMT sales through a game interface if that is the road you want to go down.
I don't personally care about RMT beyond fair application of the rules. So moving on...
I think the point to be taken from the RMT scheme is the influence this almost certainly had on the favoritism displayed toward SOMER. Here's the data I want to see: A breakdown of affiliate GTC sales over the last year. I suspect CCP has good reason to think SOMER is the best "fansite" around.
It's the monetization of CCP's in-game favor, and I don't think anyone supports that! All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
222
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:22:00 -
[890] - Quote
Hey guyz!! I gotz a Grey AreaGäó!!! Can you not see Grey there?? Omg you must be colorblind  |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
382
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 04:41:00 -
[891] - Quote
CCP is merely weighing the risk/benefits of it now. The only reason they would decide to allow the GTC RMT to continue is that they might think it makes them money. The might be thinking it is better to allow the GTC RMT to continue, and risk losing subscribers because they will take less of a financial hit than if they disallow the GTC RMT.
However, the opposite is true and it has nothing to do with how many subscribers they will lose. That, and I owe CCP a small apology.
CCP, please read this closely:
People will not play less SOMER because you no longer allow them to give away 200M isk with their GTC sales. They will play just as much SOMER, and therefore need just as much ISK, except that SOMER will no longer be giving them shadow ISK.
All it means is that they will need to buy MORE GTC's and PLEX to get the same amount of isk.
In other words, SOMER is undercutting CCP by giving out free "isk" with their GTC sales. If you get that extra 200 mil, that's 200 mil you do not need to buy from CCP.
If you use the price of PLEX as a guide, that's roughly 5-6 dollars taken away from CCP every time an eve gambler buys a GTC that comes with free isk.
So if no player centered argument has helped thus far - then let that sink in. SOMER may promote GTC sales, and thus be good for you, but the 200M credit does the opposite. People need fewer GTC's and fewer PLEX and therefore you lose money.
So I apologize. I was wrong - you are NOT profiting from SOMER's RMT scheme. It is actually costing you 6 dollars every time they sell a GTC. |

Kate stark
636
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 05:21:00 -
[892] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
"discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened"
sure trebor.
also, if CCP read every thread like they claim to then it shouldn't matter how frequently i post as they read all threads and thus everyone's opinion is read, and heard, and not lost at all. so which is it? we're being told to shut up, or we're being told ccp lie and don't actually read the forum threads they claim to? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
679
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 06:00:00 -
[893] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened
No, that is a bad idea, Kate.
We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments.
The issue does need fixing and we are working on that fix.
Putting words in our mouths to inflame and troll isn't the way to progress. Threats to leave and unsubscribe make some sense as hitting a company where it lives is effective but if you are leaving then you shouldn't have a lot of say in what those of us staying behind live with for rules.
I understand that some of you are angry . . . good. It shows you really care about this game. Otherwise your reaction would be 'meh, whatever'. But harness that anger. Apply it in a focused way rather than spinning on the floor kicking and yelling 'but I want it my way' over and over.
Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids)
BUT THAT is what helps us move forward. That is what makes people read and think and consider change.
Nobody asked you to shut up, just to pause, take a breath and present your arguments in calm rational way without all the repetition. I know that goes directly against the rules of threadnaughts but ti will work far better in the long run.
As for me, my biggest fear is that if things become black and white we may lose a LOT of the community support for other sites, other people who have done so much for the game but may wind up on the wrong side of some line drawn in ink. It is why I like the grey. Sure, Eve players being who they are will dance in the grey areas to find where the line actually is and that is their right. But I really really do not want to see some babies thrown out with the bathwater.
So making a snap decision and drawing hard and fast rules . . . well look over at the TOS thread and see how much that form of handling problems has worked out. So we listen to you, or try to. We talk to CCP and try to find what was done and why, what will happen next and make a format for the future that will address the current issues.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4409
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 06:27:00 -
[894] - Quote
So, to recap, the next expansion is called Rubicon for a reason.
That is, CCP has to take the bold step and cross the RMT river (including Aurum surrogates, let's call them like this) or not. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1946
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 06:56:00 -
[895] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate stark wrote:discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened No, that is a bad idea, Kate. We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments. The issue does need fixing and we are working on that fix. Putting words in our mouths to inflame and troll isn't the way to progress. Threats to leave and unsubscribe make some sense as hitting a company where it lives is effective but if you are leaving then you shouldn't have a lot of say in what those of us staying behind live with for rules. I understand that some of you are angry . . . good. It shows you really care about this game. Otherwise your reaction would be 'meh, whatever'. But harness that anger. Apply it in a focused way rather than spinning on the floor kicking and yelling 'but I want it my way' over and over. Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids) BUT THAT is what helps us move forward. That is what makes people read and think and consider change. Nobody asked you to shut up, just to pause, take a breath and present your arguments in calm rational way without all the repetition. I know that goes directly against the rules of threadnaughts but ti will work far better in the long run. As for me, my biggest fear is that if things become black and white we may lose a LOT of the community support for other sites, other people who have done so much for the game but may wind up on the wrong side of some line drawn in ink. It is why I like the grey. Sure, Eve players being who they are will dance in the grey areas to find where the line actually is and that is their right. But I really really do not want to see some babies thrown out with the bathwater. So making a snap decision and drawing hard and fast rules . . . well look over at the TOS thread and see how much that form of handling problems has worked out. So we listen to you, or try to. We talk to CCP and try to find what was done and why, what will happen next and make a format for the future that will address the current issues. m
You want people to put aside the rhetoric? What kind of space politician are you? isn't that against the rules?
Going forward I suggest that: A: no tranferrable in game items are given out as prizes, except as part of CCP run competitions, where a sizeable portion of the player base has the ability to enter. Prizes to SCL winners are allowable, but not to the organisers, for example. B: At no time should unique ships be given out. A blueprint for the ship, which requires a base version of the ship should be done. C: All in game prizes should have lore backing (Even if it's just corporate sponsorship) D: Avatar items for participation in an in game/out of game event are allowable, as long as it's more than 'we meet in a pub', and it's open to all players. no "Free for members of 'vote steve ronuken for CSM', for everyone else it's 10,000k". Minor discounting is ok, but more than 10-20% is not. I'd suggest sticking to t-shirts for this. E: non-transferrable prizes can be at CCP's discretion. Such as getting to name something. (see my blog post on this for more detailing of non-transferrable, without requiring soulbinding.) Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1449
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 07:14:00 -
[896] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:
Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids)
This is just so patronizing.
Dear Mike, I also have 'kids' and they are probably older than you.
Simple, for your benefit Mike,
CCP favouring any player corp with 'stuff' which can be used in-game is wrong.
Barbie stuff is fine.
Simple enough for you?
This is not a signature. |

Frying Doom
2633
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 07:55:00 -
[897] - Quote
Work in progress, what should the survey ask?
The following has these different answers Yes/No/Sometimes/I Don't know/(N/A) or a Number
Community Sites
1) Community sites should be given rewards by CCPYes 2) Community sites could be given Plex as prizes for contestsYes 3) Community sites could be given in game items as rewardsYes 4) Should these items be "soulbound"Yes 5) Community sites could be given plex as an incentiveYes 6) How many maximum4 7) Community sites could receive fanfest tickets as an incentiveYes 8) We could pay for their airfare, hotel ect..Yes 9) We give other out of game rewards to community sitesYes 10) T-shirts could be given to community sitesYes 11) USBs could be given to community sitesYes 12) Model ships could be given to community sitesYes 13) Should community sites be given prizes to raffle in gameNo 14) CCP should run the raffle/gifting, the community site promotes it. Yes 15) Should the CSM be given a special ship for each CSM yearYes 16) Should it be "Soulbound"Yes
For Profit sites
1)I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.No 2)I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.No 3)I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me they can give me ingame assetsNo 4)should their be a current value limit on these assets(N/A) 5)How much should be the limit in isk, in one calander year(N/A) 6)I provide a service to the EVE community, should CCP offer me fanfest ticketsYes 7)I provide a service to the EVE community, should CCP also pay my airfare, hotel ect..No 8)I provide a service to the EVE community, should CCP offer me items to give to my customersNo 9)I provide a service to the EVE community, should CCP allow me to RMTNo 10)I provide a service to the EVE community, should I be given preferential treatmentNo 11)I provide a service to the EVE community, should my ability to advertise at events be enoughYes
Special Events/ AT 1)Should the alliance toraments continue with special ships for the winnersYes 2)Should for Profit sites be allowed to contribute to these eventsYes 3)Should Community sites be allowed to contributeYes
That is all that I can think of at the moment and its a bit lop sided my self, I will continue to work on this but for me personally I see a huge difference between a community site (Crossing Zebras, DOTLAN, EvE Markets, ect...) and a paid site (Somer blink, EvE-Games ect..) community sites are done out of a love of community and people spend months working for nothing other that the love of the game, For Profit sites work for months with the aim to make money. Subsequently CCP should be backing Community sites as For Profit ones are there for themselves and they will do their own sponsoring to make more money. Most people call this advertising.
I would like to know what questions other people think are relevant, as I said this is very much a work in progress.
Oh and I very much hate " Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community." Their benefits according to who? Goonswarm would say their wiki/website benefits thousands of people, while other places might be more valuable to more people but be harder to prove. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:04:00 -
[898] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate stark wrote:discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened No, that is a bad idea, Kate. We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments. The issue does need fixing and we are working on that fix. Putting words in our mouths to inflame and troll isn't the way to progress. Threats to leave and unsubscribe make some sense as hitting a company where it lives is effective but if you are leaving then you shouldn't have a lot of say in what those of us staying behind live with for rules. I understand that some of you are angry . . . good. It shows you really care about this game. Otherwise your reaction would be 'meh, whatever'. But harness that anger. Apply it in a focused way rather than spinning on the floor kicking and yelling 'but I want it my way' over and over. Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids) BUT THAT is what helps us move forward. That is what makes people read and think and consider change. Nobody asked you to shut up, just to pause, take a breath and present your arguments in calm rational way without all the repetition. I know that goes directly against the rules of threadnaughts but ti will work far better in the long run. As for me, my biggest fear is that if things become black and white we may lose a LOT of the community support for other sites, other people who have done so much for the game but may wind up on the wrong side of some line drawn in ink. It is why I like the grey. Sure, Eve players being who they are will dance in the grey areas to find where the line actually is and that is their right. But I really really do not want to see some babies thrown out with the bathwater. So making a snap decision and drawing hard and fast rules . . . well look over at the TOS thread and see how much that form of handling problems has worked out. So we listen to you, or try to. We talk to CCP and try to find what was done and why, what will happen next and make a format for the future that will address the current issues. m
Well I agree with you.
But you must admit, the main reason people are getting over the top (me included) is because there is no progress and it feels like we are being ignored.
I can illustrate this with a simple example.
SOMERblink is still RMTing... |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2505
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:05:00 -
[899] - Quote
Trebor/Mike/Any other CSM who wants to respond:
Why do we need a survey to determine whether CCP should enforce its own rules? CCP staffers have been playing favourites, picking and choosing the winners in a competitive in-game area (gambling) with valuable in-game and out-of-game gifts. Their chosen favourites also appear to be engaged in shady RMT practises. CCP staffers playing favourites in the sandbox is forbidden, and RMT or pseudo-RMT activities are forbidden. We don't need to wait for a survey to tell you that and the fact you're putting that forward as a solution is laughable.
Imagine a politician is pulled over for speeding, and the publicity as a result of that uncovers that the politician's activities on the day he was pulled over link him to a money-laundering front for some illegitimate activity. Imagine then that it also turns out that the money laundering front was making significant campaign donations to the party the politician and his colleagues belong to. Now imagine then that the politician's colleagues and the public body assigned to advise them suggest that based on these revelations, rather than the politician and his money laundering friends being charged for their criminal activity, the response should be to first undertake a lengthy public referendum on whether the speed limit is too low, and whether money laundering is bad.
Do you seriously not see any credibility gap here? CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

Frying Doom
2633
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:19:00 -
[900] - Quote
While I myself do like the survey so as to properly set out a policy of exactly what CCP should do, with as few Grey areas as possible, as CCP has shown it will do really stupid things without a rigid guide line.
I must admit the RMT needs to stop NOW. The language in the EULA is not vague, it is quiet clear. It is a breach of the EULA and makes a mockery of all the accounts that have been cancelled for RMTing.
If I was more of a tinfoil person I would feel that CCP employees have turned a blind eye in return for kick backs or special favors at events like EvE Vegas, lucky I am not that kind of person huh. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:32:00 -
[901] - Quote
Guys just give up.
SOMERblink is the EVE golden child now, CCP doesnt want all these attacks against them.
They are keeping their hundreds of billions of ships, the vegas thing is still happening, and the RMT exception is standing they dont need to give a reason for it.
Stop being so jelous. Just go play Star Citizen https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game if you don't like it.
PS
I am officially giving up. Going to just lapse my remaining account and play star craft or league of legends until star citizen is up and running.
Adios |

Frying Doom
2633
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 08:35:00 -
[902] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:Guys just give up. SOMERblink is the EVE golden child now, CCP doesnt want all these attacks against them. They are keeping their hundreds of billions of ships, and the vegas thing is still happening. Stop being so jelous. Just go play Star Citizen https://robertsspaceindustries.com/about-the-game if you don't like it. PS I am officially giving up. Going to just lapse my remaining account and play star craft or league of legends until star citizen is up and running. Adios Some of us are already convincing our wives why we need a TrakIR and a HOTAS Warthog to go with our Star Citizen account for the dog fighting module.  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2499
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 09:48:00 -
[903] - Quote
Star Citizen and X Rebirth, oh my
shame about EVE though
Tell the bean counters to thank Navigator and Guard for lapsing subs |

sally Deninard
mss industry
64
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:04:00 -
[904] - Quote
I`m giving up, I`ve had one question to ask throughout this whole debacle and nobody has been able to answer it. I haven`t been repeatidly yelling and shiptoasting like a child, I`ve just asked... in various threads... that get locked....just like this one will. The CSM had recognised there were problems with the draw before it went ahead and listed them HERE before the draw happened. In the post they had brought to CCP`s attention that not everyone could compete in the SOMER draw and that was a problem. CCP ignored them and continued anyway.
My question is why CCP did you ignore the CSM and let a skewed lottery go ahead? It`s an easy question ....
Frankly from my point of view is unable to regulate itself, even with the tools to do so and that is why i`m offski 07. It undermines even the work that themselves and the CSM are doing right now and makes a mockery of the CSM process.
To any of the CSM..
What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again
And stop spamming my inbox with re-subscription reminders CCP ffs... it`s just desperate. |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 10:50:00 -
[905] - Quote
If you are currently considering whether to leave, you might want to switch any accounts that are due for renewal soon to one month to minimise the expense of getting out.... |

Epikurus
The Mjolnir Bloc
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:04:00 -
[906] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Frying, the point is that Quote:Grey areas on the survey as in should gifts be given to for profit sites for prizes. The answer is NO, see no grey at all. YOU not seeing grey areas is a factor of your perspective, others see things differently and therein lies the shadowy boundary rules. The grey. m
The fact that an individual is unable or unwilling to grasp perfectly well-defined boundaries does not mean there is any kind of grey area. You are mistaking stupidity for complexity. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3134
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:23:00 -
[907] - Quote
sally Deninard wrote:What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again? It is my experience that:
a) CCP listens to CSM after the sh*t hits the fan.
b) CCP listens to CSM when they brief us in advance about something and we say "that is a lump of sh*t approaching a fan". Note that in this case, you probably never hear about the situation.
These situations occur when:
c) CCP doesn't tell us something, so we don't get to smell-test approaching potential turds on fan-intersecting trajectories. (ie: the SOMER lottery)
d) Something just isn't on anyone's radar, until something else brings it to community awareness. (ie: the SOMER lottery sparking discussion of GTC-seller business practices).
The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom." Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Frying Doom
2638
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:32:00 -
[908] - Quote
and the citizens get to either try and assassinate the king or flee the kingdom. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Din Chao
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:32:00 -
[909] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves.
So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
153
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:40:00 -
[910] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves. So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey. Not Empty Quoting
seems CCP is committed to these 'special relationship's and gift giving, which is why they need their lawyers to do the legalese involved with sponsoring a casino. they also expect us to be mollified by what is likely to be a survey that doesn't explain the root of the issue and only offers questions that will lead to answers they want. we are also expected to wait months for this issue before it 'maybe' is resolved. please correct me where i'm wrong. |
|

sally Deninard
mss industry
68
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 11:47:00 -
[911] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:sally Deninard wrote:What makes you think that CCP will listen to you and the playerbase when a situation blows up again? It is my experience that: a) CCP listens to CSM after the sh*t hits the fan. b) CCP listens to CSM when they brief us in advance about something and we say "that is a lump of sh*t approaching a fan". Note that in this case, you probably never hear about the situation."
No offence but everyone including the CSM briefed CCP well in advance about the huge torrent of sh*t that was approaching. They responded with a big f*ck you and f*ck the CSM (here are some better prizes SOMER btw)
So it`s fair to say that any future agreements and negotiations are just going to be a joke to CCP when it suits. This is the real problem that everyone misses in this whole sh*tstorm, the fact the whole process is a sham. |

Frying Doom
2640
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:22:00 -
[912] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right. On further reflection why does this phrase make me feel like a massive F U is on the way to the playerbase?
I get the feeling they are going to say Somer and the like are allowed to RMT or that they will just give gifts as they want.
Why do I also get the feeling the king is also starting an experiment on poverty. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4412
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:31:00 -
[913] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
1) The second and third sentences tell in a nutshell why CSM is a weak approach. It's a lot better than zero, but you guys get bypassed at whim, because CSM not only lacks of "veto" powers but also lacks of simple "visibility on everything" powers. Thus flying dogpiles can happily go for the fan without you being shown them.
2) The first sentence, is not just because of players prejudices or malice.
A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a metter of common sense. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:42:00 -
[914] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Gentlepods,
Since people have taken it upon themselves to deliver some "realtalk", you will forgive me if I take the opportunity to do the same.
Participants in this thread should be aware that:
* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
* Raging and repeating your position at every opportunity is not constructive, and actively hurts your argument. All it does is sh*t up the thread, and drown out other voices. If you want to be taken seriously, you want to encourage broad discussion. Threads that have a high percentage of posts by a small number of posters are not taken seriously by anyone.
* The reason for the surveys -- both CSMs and CCPs -- is to gather more data from more members of the community. CSM needs that data in order to make the best possible arguments on your behalf; "the data says" is a better argument than "the opinion of my ass is".
I understand that people are upset. I am upset too -- my personal position is very similar to that of Argus Sorn. But giving in to your anger will not get you a good result; it just makes it easier to avoid addressing the merits of your arguments.
Best Trebor
I just don't get the idea of the survey. I understand what you write about getting data, but the whole idea and concept of the CSM is that the CSM should function as a soundingboard for the community that elected them. They represent the community and should have both enough confidence, legitimacy, and feeling with the community to be taken seriously by CCP when voicing their opinions without needing to send out surveys. The survey is more or less useless for several reason:
1. A survey result is only as good as its interpretation and many questions can be interpreted differently both by the survey maker (CSM/CCP) and by the players answering the question.
2. If you need a suvey now when does it stop? Does the CSM then need a player-base-wide survey every time they have to deal with the CCP? Isn't the point of us electing you that we trust in your judgement without having to do large surveys every time an issue arises? The CSM are in the CSM council to be the voice of the players. If we disagree with your judgement we can elect new representatives in the future.
3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey.
4. A lot of people are not going to answer a survey, it will get lost in the mail. do people with 10+ account's answers get more weight in the result, people's first language is not english, some don't even speak it, people misunderstand the question because they don't know the background for it and thus answers differently than they otherwise would, not everyone in a space game are old or mature enough that you necessarily want to base important game management decisions on their answers, etc etc etc. A survey is a bad idea and the CSM function is exactly the opposite, so that CCP doesn't have to bother us all with surveys since they have you whom we have elected.
Good luck ! :)  |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:46:00 -
[915] - Quote
If you missed it then check out this thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241
This post in it is pretty important: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3747593#post3747593 |

The Legendary Soldier
Interworld Venom
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 12:56:00 -
[916] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:[quote=Trebor Daehdoow]Gentlepods,
3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey.
True. But they are not giving the answers CCP wants.
In a survey you can influence answers by the way you phrase questions.
Something marketeers and politicians have known for a long time. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
155
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:27:00 -
[917] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: But they are not giving the answers CCP wants.
In a survey you can influence answers by the way you phrase questions.
Something marketeers and politicians have known for a long time.
we are dealing with marketeers and politicians here, and it is pretty easy to see what they're doing. it's a good thing Eve has a generally older / more mature audience, because a lot of us can see through the wool they're trying to pull over our eyes. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:36:00 -
[918] - Quote
ATTN CCP GUARD
raven666wings wrote: Aknowledging the use of isk tokens to reward the GTC referrals in Somer Blink, EVE-GAMES.NET and other websites, CCP has apparently allowed everyone to set up their own GTC resale referral system+isk token reward. Official confirmation from CCP on this would be nice before we proceed so that we not risk getting accounts banned for misunderstandings.
PLZ CONFIRM THIS FOR US |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
225
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:41:00 -
[919] - Quote
Hey CSM dudes, you wanna be helpful here to the community? Plz tell your godfathers to come down and make a statement to confirm that we can engage in the same conduct as Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other websites out there rewarding isk for GTC referals. Let's get this over it. Feel free to send me a poll asking if I like babanas, watermellons or pineapples too. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3135
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 13:52:00 -
[920] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
227
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:01:00 -
[921] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Would CCP be profiting from that? Would other CSM members be allowed to do the same? If not you may wanna call it a Grey Area.
PS- Grow a pair and either tell people you allow the same behaviour for all or are only favoring a few. Everybody knows the only grey area here is between the white of an empty CCP wallet and the black of a full one. |

Frying Doom
2642
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:07:00 -
[922] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  And you wouldn't even have to RMT like Somer to get there. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

AayJay Crendraven
Dakka Unlimited
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:27:00 -
[923] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Then why dont you ******* do your job and get CCP to fix the problem instead of playing mommy's boy and telling us to not get angry? |

Din Chao
408
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 14:36:00 -
[924] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER.  So, in your words, you've been told TRILLIONS of times by the community that you do a poor job representing the community, but prefer to ignore these criticisms from the community because that would mean you'd have to start representing that community.
Got it, thank you for your service. |

RAW23
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:08:00 -
[925] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Can you explain how you reconcile your stance of two weeks ago, stating that you, and the CSM more generally, owe no duty of consultation to the player-base because you were elected as representatives to give your own views on their behalf, with your current unwillingness to take a position, instead supporting the rather ludicrous idea of a consultative, but thoroughly unscientific, survey 'to find out what the player-base wants'?
Also, no, you would have a few hundred thousand isk max  There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:08:00 -
[926] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate stark wrote:discussing the issue and suggesting alternatives is a bad idea; shut up and let's pretend this never happened No, that is a bad idea, Kate. We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments. The issue does need fixing and we are working on that fix. Putting words in our mouths to inflame and troll isn't the way to progress. Threats to leave and unsubscribe make some sense as hitting a company where it lives is effective but if you are leaving then you shouldn't have a lot of say in what those of us staying behind live with for rules. I understand that some of you are angry . . . good. It shows you really care about this game. Otherwise your reaction would be 'meh, whatever'. But harness that anger. Apply it in a focused way rather than spinning on the floor kicking and yelling 'but I want it my way' over and over. Some of you are doing this and I appreciate the effort whether I agree with them or not. To put down what you want in simple statements without all the emotional baggage is hard, I get that. (I have kids) BUT THAT is what helps us move forward. That is what makes people read and think and consider change. Nobody asked you to shut up, just to pause, take a breath and present your arguments in calm rational way without all the repetition. I know that goes directly against the rules of threadnaughts but ti will work far better in the long run. As for me, my biggest fear is that if things become black and white we may lose a LOT of the community support for other sites, other people who have done so much for the game but may wind up on the wrong side of some line drawn in ink. It is why I like the grey. Sure, Eve players being who they are will dance in the grey areas to find where the line actually is and that is their right. But I really really do not want to see some babies thrown out with the bathwater. So making a snap decision and drawing hard and fast rules . . . well look over at the TOS thread and see how much that form of handling problems has worked out. So we listen to you, or try to. We talk to CCP and try to find what was done and why, what will happen next and make a format for the future that will address the current issues. m
This is a surprisingly mature post. Thanks. However our answer is a definite no... No we don't want any "grey" anymore. We want it black and white, with lines clearly drawn and pretty visible when anyone attempts to play a dirt game. It is mostly so when it comes to most matters in game, it should be so with CCP's other dealings as well. I understand that some people in the grey with white intentions might have losses. But then this is where a hard choice comes in, which CCP seems very very clearly delaying. It is a choice between us and the white in grey.
The consciense of the gaming community is deeply wounded and every week that passes by, more and more of the good intentions are dying. Please, as CSM, encourage CCP as hard as you can to make that choice and draw the lines ASAP. I understand that this involves a lot of intricacies and complications, but it is not rocket science either. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1453
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:12:00 -
[927] - Quote
It would be helpful if someone from Some Blink posted a defence of their activities, in particular the charge that they are involved in RMT. This is not a signature. |

Guttripper
State War Academy Caldari State
368
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:15:00 -
[928] - Quote
*continues reading this thread.
Now I remember why I have skipped voting for any CSM members these past few years... |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:30:00 -
[929] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
News at 11.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
And we as the commoners get to tell the King "You can get f*cked" while we unsub our accounts if we don't like the way he's ruling the kingdom (pretty much what you should be doing too instead of kissing his ass). |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4417
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:30:00 -
[930] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:A real CSM member who cares would be a bit more vocal and a bit less "let's do a poll to see if breaking the law is OK or not".
It's a matter of common sense. If I had an ISK for every time someone's told me what a "real CSM" would do, I'd be richer than SOMER. 
Don't try playing the "I have been forced into being a politician" card with me. It does not work.
If you joined the CSM is because you felt like you could do something and you knew that people would hold you accountable for what you do, say and also don't say or not do. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3135
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:35:00 -
[931] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:[quote=Trebor Daehdoow]So, in your words, you've been told TRILLIONS of times by the community... More likely I've been told trillions of times by the same 10 guys and their alts. Everyone else just calmly gives me their opinions, concerns, and votes.  Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
228
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 15:43:00 -
[932] - Quote
Din Chao wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:* This issue is not going to be resolved quickly. The problem was a long time in the making, and it will be months in the resolution, if for no other reason than there are significant legal issues CCP has to take into consideration. Furthermore, a quick resolution is unlikely to be one you will like.
Sorry if CCP's legal department is so incompetent that it takes them months to work out a problem that should have been considered years ago. But that doesn't mean I have to continue paying them while they find their collective asses. That's not rage, BTW, it's simple personal finance. If I'm unhappy with a product, I'm not going to continue to buy it for a yet to be determined number of months in the hope that it will improve. I'll stop buying it, and only buy it if it improves. So again, that's one less dissenting opinion for your eventual, redundant survey.
CCP wants to take time to acess the situation with the stakeholders before stating a public policy on the matter of RMT through GTC isk tokens bonuses. It's becoming obvious this is another maneuver to gain time and hope that this matter will remain in that "grey area" they're trying to create.
We as constumers however are not forced to keep paying for unfair service while waiting indefinitely for a resolution and have the power to refuse this conduct from CCP by unsubbing our accounts.
Furthermore we should only resub them back when the policy regarding the community services, fansites and GTC isk tokens RMT is announced, clear and subject to be applied to every entity/player without exception. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1455
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:13:00 -
[933] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Din Chao wrote:[quote=Trebor Daehdoow]So, in your words, you've been told TRILLIONS of times by the community... More likely I've been told trillions of times by the same 10 guys and their alts. Everyone else just calmly gives me their opinions, concerns, and votes. 
How many of the possible player votes did you actually get?
This is not a signature. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:25:00 -
[934] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Everyone else just calmly gives me their opinions, concerns, and votes.  Giving you opinions, concerns and votes somehow seems highly useful.
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
|

Din Chao
413
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:32:00 -
[935] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Din Chao wrote:[quote=Trebor Daehdoow]So, in your words, you've been told TRILLIONS of times by the community... More likely I've been told trillions of times by the same 10 guys and their alts. Everyone else just calmly gives me their opinions, concerns, and votes.  Personally, I've never told you that you weren't "being a real CSM" or whatever.
My questions and concerns were presented calmly a week ago, as they were in the FIRST reply in this thread. But that was probably my alt...
Concerns of CCP endorsing "services" like SOMER that run unregulated lotteries have been completely ignored in every official response in this thread, including the CSM responses.
I'm not the only one to voice these concerns, Jeg Elsker had similar questions on the most recent Crossing Zebras episode. He must be my alt...
When your continued response to reasonable, calm questions and concerns is condescension and snark, don't get upset when people tell you to go **** yourself. |

handbanana
State War Academy Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:37:00 -
[936] - Quote
Great job CCP! I was only back for about 4 months this time before your greed, favoritism, and utter incompetence ruined my desire to play again. You guys are like a dog that can't seem to learn to stop pissing in the house.
2 of my 3 accounts expire next week, and the third one expires a week after that. Time to do the only thing CCP understands.
You might as well disband the CSM and save the money, you are obviously not using them for anything and I have a feeling you may need that money soon.
GÇ£It takes a big man to cry, but it takes a bigger man to laugh at that man.GÇ¥ -á-á -Jack Handy
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
157
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:37:00 -
[937] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
a king and his council only rule at the whim of their subjects and 'divine right' doesn't count for much when the guillotines are erected by the agitated masses or when an usurper takes the throne. CCP is fed by it's customers, not the other way around. it's best to not forget that. many a king has fallen victim to his hubris. |

Careby
Careby Exploration
53
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:53:00 -
[938] - Quote
I don't think a survey is a particularly good idea, for several reasons. One is the delay it necessarily imposes on getting any sort of resolution to the current problems. Another is that it introduces a new thing for players to complain about, in that there is no way any set of questions will be viewed as appropriate by all involved. The results will always be seen as flawed in some way.
But much more troubling than the idea of a survey is that the idea of a survey was proposed by the CSM. The CSM, in my view, is supposed to represent the player base. Democracy is a very messy process, and we went through it already to elect the CSM. Now we have them in place, and as veteran EVE players they should be capable of expressing reasonable player concerns to CCP, quickly and directly, without delay, and without conducting a survey or investigation or otherwise dragging things out for an extended period.
I have to assume that if CCP headquarters was on fire, immediate action would be taken to put the fire out. And if for some reason CCP was unable to decide what action would most likely put out the fire, and consulted the CSM, that the CSM would respond with some immediate sage advice regarding fire extinguishers, water, and calling the fire department. Clearly this current situation is not seen as an emergency by either CCP or the CSM. It appears to be something to be taken under advisement for possible further consideration, after lengthy collection of data. Possibly in the hope that the storm will blow over before any action is required.
My grandfather always told me that even a poor decision is better than indecision. I still believe him, even after making plenty of poor decisions. I personally would like to see some immediate corrective action. It may not be perfect. Hell, I wouldn't expect it to be. And if and when it becomes apparent that it wasn't quite right, it can be followed by some more corrective action. Just don't sit around waiting for the game to burn.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
233
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 16:53:00 -
[939] - Quote
This is what we do to kings where I come from. Not going around kissing his ass. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
390
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:19:00 -
[940] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
a king and his council only rule at the whim of their subjects and 'divine right' doesn't count for much when the guillotines are erected by the agitated masses or when an usurper takes the throne. CCP is fed by it's customers, not the other way around. it's best to not forget that. many a king has fallen victim to his hubris.
CCP is not the "King".
CCP is the "Company". Companies don't have subjects, they have "customers".
There are not many available customers for MMO companies, especially companies that already self select out a very specific group of customers by the nature of their game and business model. This gives them a rather small market to begin with.
It turns out in an MMO those customers invest a tremendous amount of time and energy into the game, and since they feel their only recourse (and you can ask yourself why they feel this is their only recourse... because that alone is a failure of the company) is to quit and throw all of that way - they are understandably upset.
Smart companies get concerned when their customers are upset because they value EVERY customer. Those companies understand that the upset customers deserve better than to be dismissed merely because they are upset. Especially when that market is small, you've already self selected out too many potential customers to afford to dismiss those you do have. Smart companies understand that how you handle your most irate, most difficult customer speaks more about you than how you deal with the calm and agreeable ones.
Thankfully, and I hope I am right here, but I believe based on my own conversations with Hilmar over "monoclegate" that he gets this.
If the ragey, trolling, and sarcastic responses by some of the community are bad - smug and dismissive responses from CSM members and/or CCP employees are far worse.
Everyone needs to be patient - but the CSM and CCP also need to understand why there is so much outrage and they need to take it seriously and more specifically, they need make sure people believe it is being taken seriously. It is one thing to take it seriously, it is another to convey that message successfully.
The continued upset you are hearing is because people DO NOT feel that way. Which means your message is getting muddled.
As for those upset folks - let me say this:
I believe that I have heard enough in the subtext and tweenspeak of some of the responses and rumor I am hearing to know that there are at least folks in the trenches who get it and who see these things with clarity. I believe that somewhere behind the scenes we have the advocates we need.
Even if we did not - then this is not a company worthy of our stress and concern. Be patient, and let those who have the ethical clarity and good business sense to see the way through this and who are in a position to influence the response on this issue... let them do their job.
If they fail, then we can make sure our voice is heard. Until then - be patient. |
|

Kate stark
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:26:00 -
[941] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:We should discuss the issue without resorting to repetition, misquoting or over the top arguments.
unfortunately when CCP closes threads and redirects you to TWO irrelevant threads, and doesn't really seem to notice that they've missed the point. you can't help but feel like you have to repeat yourself to get your point across. even more so when people post irrelevant things like "umad sum1 gt mre skrpns dn u?!" which really contributes nothing but people having to point out to them that we're discussing something entirely different.
either way due to eve vegas coming up i don't really see anything in this thread being massively productive until after the event has finished. which is fine.
although i hope ccp don't feel like i'm flat out attacking them. far from it, i love ccp and i love eve. it just boggles my mind that they thought not announcing a large giveaway of billions of isk of assets to an in game entity wouldn't be met with this kind of response. even more baffling is that they didn't announce it when it's meant to be a reward for blink's contribution to eve or whatever, i mean we don't hold the olympic events then not bother to televise the medal ceremony and spend hours finding our foreign friends and saying "ha we got x more medals than you!" etc.
for people who have created a game we all love (to hate in some people's cases) it's absurd that they could make this kind of error. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
235
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:27:00 -
[942] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: If they fail, then we can make sure our voice is heard. Until then - be patient.
Yes, we are patient. With our accounts unsubbed. We'll sub them back when the waiting is over. |

Kate stark
641
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:36:00 -
[943] - Quote
and on a separate note; i noticed there was a job on the ccp website a while ago looking for a data analyst. if they're worth their salt and given any input on the surveys i don't expect to see a single leading question on either of the surveys.
otherwise the list of criteria was clearly a "wishlist" rather than a list of "prerequisites" and i'd have bothered applying for the job myself. because ****, i ticked most of the boxes on the list. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:50:00 -
[944] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: EVE-Games, there is no risk for you in the auctions, raffles, lotteries, whatever you want to call them. Therefore you are RMT'ing. Please do not deny it.
It is simple. You are selling isk for cash everytime someone bids on one of your auctions with "bonus isk". You got cash, they got bonus isk and then they contribute it toward the sale of the 'auction'.
No matter WHO WINS, you get the cash.
That's RMT. There is no gray area here. You engage in RMT, just like SOMERblink.
But you have a choice now:
You can step up to the plate, be a winner and say "yeah, I realize now that it's RMT, sorry it was a mistake, it's going to stop today", or you can take the low road and try and argue that it's not.
Stand up man, admit it and make a change and you may be the next big lottery site - because you'll have a ton of backers from this thread who respect you for your honor.
Thanks for your reply, while I do understand and respect your opinion... I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP
As I have stated previously, if CCP changes the language or asks me to stop the program. I will comply immediately.
I also wanted to say, to those that have stated they are so enraged by this that they are quitting the game....STOP, there's no need to do anything drastic. Give CCP time to work out a resolution to this question, whatever that might be. I have been playing this game for years and love it and I can tell from your passion regarding this topic that you love it too. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2512
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 17:56:00 -
[945] - Quote
Do we have an explanation yet for why it is that when anyone else is caught in RMT practises, they're immediately permabanned, but when CCP's chosen favourites Somer are found to be doing it, the response is to hold off a decision (and allow the RMT to continue in the meantime) whilst a lengthy consultation is conducted about whether Somer's chosen method of RMT is so bad after all?
I'd already decided to let this one remaining account lapse when this whole mess started but the more of this utter trainwreck unfolds before me the less inclined I feel to reverse that decision. CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
236
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:10:00 -
[946] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. Please link document or official CCP statement with such interpretation.
EVE-GAMES wrote:I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP What you failed to understand (or are simply pretending to ignore) is that it isn't up to us to interpret and argument about the EULA, that's what CCP has to do and publicly announce a clear policy to be applied equally to every entity/player that wants to engage in the same conduct you and Somer Blink are engaging in.
To safeguard the best interests of all the players and the integrity of the game's sandbox, the highest possible number of accounts should remain unsubbed until such policy is announced. |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
103
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:10:00 -
[947] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:Do we have an explanation yet for why it is that when anyone else is caught in RMT practises, they're immediately permabanned, but when CCP's chosen favourites Somer are found to be doing it, the response is to hold off a decision (and allow the RMT to continue in the meantime) whilst a lengthy consultation is conducted about whether Somer's chosen method of RMT is so bad after all?
I'd already decided to let this one remaining account lapse when this whole mess started but the more of this utter trainwreck unfolds before me the less inclined I feel to reverse that decision. Other RMTers operate independently and cut CCP out of the market, denying them possible plex sales the people needing isk might have bought. By basing his RMT through gametime sales SOMER is giving CCP a cut of the profits on every transaction.
banned RMTer = sent someone some isk somehow and got $ in his paypal account (or something. I'm not an RMTer so how would I know) Somer RMT = $ in CCP's wallet with every sale
What's going to happen is in a few months they'll release a EULA/TOS "clarification" to explicitly allow Somer's business model. Then they'll release a survey after this with no questions at all related to Somer's RMT, because if you disagree with them then you'll be in breach of EULA. The only survey questions will be like 'what cool things can CCP do with giveaways in the future' and have pretty much nothing related to the meat of the issue whatsoever.
I added one more month on both of my accounts when Guard made this thread because I was hoping for a resolution. THAT was my patience. My patience is certainly NOT waiting around for months only for CCP to eventually tell us to **** off anyway. |

Din Chao
418
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:20:00 -
[948] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:I also wanted to say, to those that have stated they are so enraged by this that they are quitting the game....STOP, there's no need to do anything drastic. Give CCP time to work out a resolution to this question, whatever that might be. I have been playing this game for years and love it and I can tell from your passion regarding this topic that you love it too. 1. Unsubbing is a legitimate form of protest, and one that in the past has been effective in getting CCP's attention.
2. I'll spend my money as I please, thank you. I could have PLEXed my account for a year or so, but decided instead to give the ISK to ACTUAL community groups that add content to the ACTUAL game. Not for-profit third parties who merely use the game as a token transfer tool. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
466
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:22:00 -
[949] - Quote
When you allow the party that is in the wrong to dictate the direction of the discussion and steer it, there is no way for them to be wrong.
On the other hand, when you allow the party that thinks the wrong party can do no right to steer the course of the discussion, there is no way for them to be right.
It is a balancing act, and not one easily done. It requires proper planning on the parts of all involved, and must lead to logical discussion. Passion rules reason, as we've seen in this thread: CCP doesn't believe they have done anything wrong (as evidenced by the fact they aren't talking about this until after the gathering in which people have a very large gripe over. It's, pure and simple, a conflict of interest. At least, it will appear that way to those who are against the entire thing to begin with. How do we fix this? Let me lay out my problems here.
During Monoclegate (before, really) the CSM was talked to about the NeX store, and selling things in-game. The concept of "golden ammo" was brought up, and the CSM rightfully said "hells to the **** no". CCPcan't be willing to break the game like that to make more money, because in the end they would have lost money from people being unwilling to play a game that was pure pay to win while they were still paying a subscription. One thing led to another, and by and large CCP did not come out of that looking clean:
- the Fearless newsletter; - the leaked Hilmar letter ("very predictable feedback", "now is the time where we see what our customers do and base it on that, not on what they say"); - CCP Pann's threadnaught where she says she is, legitimately, buying time until they can come up with something they think we'd want to hear, and; - at the end of it, the firing of CCP Pann and the community PR team for the forums, which was taken over by volunteers to save the company money.
The last part is only mentioned because the players were scapegoated by Hilmar over this matter, which was an absolute **** move on Hilmar's part, trying to play off the conscience and feelings of people in a game where consciences don't exist (I think they are part of mythology!).
During this time, they focused on side-issues: the price in the NeX ($1,000 designer Japanese jeans, if you all remember), the (confirmed real) leaked newsletter, and others. At the heart of the issue that went unanswered for over a week was one simple question, oftentimes repeated in bright, bold letters in large font: "Would items that directly impact the gamestate be introduced (i.e., "golden ammo")?"
Oh, and then the alts that weren't alts, but started posting during the entire debacle and then stopped posting after this shitstorm died.
What about t20? During that time CCP's response was to ban the person who leaked the issue because he violated the EULA, but not take action until the uproar became massive against the developer who had impacted the game in such a way!
Now this comes up. Instead of directly answering the questions, and put our fears to rest, CCP has said they are going to answer after an event that is at the very heart of the issue. They have hinted that they will work to find loopholes in the EULA, and maybe close them. At the end, the CSM will have a survey, and CCP might do one of those things where you take a customer satisfaction survey while logging in.
You know, one of those things that no one does, but some will claim they do to make it look valid? I hate to be the pessimist, but I have never really seen how they impact anything CCP does.
The CSM is, once again, cleaning up the pile of **** that CCP left in the yard. This happened after Monoclegate, too. Anytime CCP decides to do their own thing and ignore what the CSM says, or forgo their opinion altogether, and there is a large public backlash, the CSM will be called in to make us shut up.
That is why people don't trust the CSM. The CSM is just a voice that can be discarded for trial-and-error tactics. In his "apology", Hilmar admitted as much. It's not the fault of the CSM directly, but they have not put their foot down in the sense that makes CCP listen. If they did, Monoclegate wouldn't have happened, after all.
Mittens, for all his shortcomings (and believe me, they are many) had it right with Monoclegate: make it public so that CCP has to respond. Cause a shitstorm of epic proportions and they have to take you seriously. They can't sweep it under the rug. Trebor and this CSM are doing surveys when they should be saying, "No, this is wrong and it doesn't take a ******* survey to figure that out. Fix it." |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:26:00 -
[950] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. Please link document or official CCP statement with such interpretation. EVE-GAMES wrote:I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP What you failed to understand (or are simply pretending to ignore) is that it isn't up to us to interpret and argument about the EULA, that's what CCP has to do and publicly announce a clear policy to be applied equally to every entity/player that wants to engage in the same conduct you and Somer Blink are engaging in. To safeguard the best interests of all the players and the integrity of the game's sandbox, the highest possible number of accounts should remain unsubbed until such policy is announced, to make sure it is announced asap and the issue is not put in a "grey area".
I am unaware of any document or official statement, I base my opinion off of the fact that this type of program has been implemented on a number of sites, with no take down orders, or bans by CCP. If they allow it then it seems they feel it is not in violation.
I do agree with you 100% that the language needs to be clearer in the EULA and I hope they do something about that.
I don't agree that un-subbing is the answer to getting what you want though, if you are not subbed then why would they care what you have to say on the topic?
|
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
467
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:29:00 -
[951] - Quote
It would seem that even CCP can't interpret their own EULA. As such, I wouldn't condone any punishment against people like EVE-GAMES. If they can't explain it simply to us, it's not fair to punish people who might not be able to understand it.
Hell, even with my knowledge of legalese I can't decipher it! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
237
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:35:00 -
[952] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote: I don't agree that un-subbing is the answer to getting what you want though, if you are not subbed then why would they care what you have to say on the topic?
It is the only means we have at our disposal as players to make our voice heard.
Din Chao wrote: 1. Unsubbing is a legitimate form of protest, and one that in the past has been effective in getting CCP's attention.
|

Din Chao
419
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:41:00 -
[953] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:I don't agree that un-subbing is the answer to getting what you want though, if you are not subbed then why would they care what you have to say on the topic? I'll try to spell this out for you.
As has been pointed out multiple times in this thread, CCP is a company in the business of making money.
The only power I, as a consumer, truly have over this company is deciding whether or not to give them my money.
I assume someone who runs a "business" like yourself understands the need for customers.
Making threads and posts until my fingers bleed means nothing to CCP as long as they continue to charge my PayPal account.
I realize it may be futile at this point, but I have only one account to give.
And this will likely be my last post on this or any subject here.
Fly safe! o7 |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 18:49:00 -
[954] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Do we have an explanation yet for why it is that when anyone else is caught in RMT practises, they're immediately permabanned, but when CCP's chosen favourites Somer are found to be doing it, the response is to hold off a decision (and allow the RMT to continue in the meantime) whilst a lengthy consultation is conducted about whether Somer's chosen method of RMT is so bad after all?
I'd already decided to let this one remaining account lapse when this whole mess started but the more of this utter trainwreck unfolds before me the less inclined I feel to reverse that decision. Other RMTers operate independently and cut CCP out of the market, denying them possible plex sales the people needing isk might have bought. By basing his RMT through gametime sales SOMER is giving CCP a cut of the profits on every transaction. banned RMTer = sent someone some isk somehow and got $ in his paypal account (or something. I'm not an RMTer so how would I know) Somer RMT = $ in CCP's wallet with every sale What's going to happen is in a few months they'll release a EULA/TOS "clarification" to explicitly allow Somer's business model. Then they'll release a survey after this with no questions at all related to Somer's RMT, because if you disagree with them then you'll be in breach of EULA. The only survey questions will be like 'what cool things can CCP do with giveaways in the future' and have pretty much nothing related to the meat of the issue whatsoever. I added one more month on both of my accounts when Guard made this thread because I was hoping for a resolution. THAT was my patience. My patience is certainly NOT waiting around for months only for CCP to eventually tell us to **** off anyway.
As I pointed out elsewhere, the GTC RMT'ers may actually be taking cash from CCP because they are giving the buyer additional isk, outside of CCP's system for purchasing it. I clearly don't know the actual numbers, but it is possible.
Basically, I don't know if I buy into the idea that the 200M credit results in more sales of GTC globally. It may just result in more sales from certain sellers (the one's that give away isk along with the GTC). I think that people will be buying GTC's anyway and that in fact, when a seller gives them an additional 200M isk, they need to buy fewer GTC's.
Indeed, if the 200M was not allowed, it might actually allow more sellers to compete on equal grounds which would result in more exposure and perhaps even more sales.
|

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
104
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:01:00 -
[955] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: As I pointed out elsewhere, the GTC RMT'ers may actually be taking cash from CCP because they are giving the buyer additional isk, outside of CCP's system for purchasing it. I don't know the actual numbers, but it is not outside the realm of possibility.
You see, I don't know if I buy into the idea that the 200M credit results in more sales of GTC globally. It may just result in more sales from certain sellers (the one's that give away isk along with the GTC). I think that people will be buying GTC's anyway and that in fact, when a seller gives them an additional 200M isk, they need to buy fewer GTC's.
Indeed, if the 200M was not allowed, it might actually allow more sellers to compete on equal grounds which would result in more exposure and perhaps even more sales.
It's possible I suppose, but without actual hard data you and I won't really be able to say for sure.
I remember when Incarna came out and people were horrified at the $70 monocle price tag. People came out and said how basically every microtransaction store on the planet makes more money from lower prices, 5 people buying something for $1 instead of 2 people buying it at $2. CCP's response was that the monocle was their top selling item, so obviously it was a good idea. The possibility that they could have made more money without the ******** pricing simply didn't make sense to them no matter how often it was pointed out.
So even if you're right and Somer either doesn't make them any more money, or even actively cuts out people buying plex because of the "free 200m" they get with each GTC purchase, CCP might still only see "SOMER Blink top GTC seller, SOMER good" |

Herr Kutz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:16:00 -
[956] - Quote
In response to this terrible assumption that isk for clicking a link and buying a GTC is RMT, there is a simple and CLEAR separation.
(Not in order, just read it ffs)
1. SOMER Blink sets up lottery site 2. Markee Dragon sets up GTC selling site 3. Markee Dragon pays SOMER the person RL money for promoting their site
THE END.
It doesn't matter that SOMER is rewarding their patrons with "blink credit". They are being paid for a service provided to Markee Dragon.
This is borne out by the numerous posts claiming that it wouldn't be a problem/wouldn't be RMT if SOMER wasn't giving out credit which can be converted to in game isk.
In case you wonder, this is the opinion of many people who don't frequent the forums who I've spoken to about this. Will they respond to some poll/q'airre? Not a chance.
Doesn't mean their (our) opinion is any less valid than those couple of dozen people who have been spamming this thread for all they're worth. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
469
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:20:00 -
[957] - Quote
No, that's just referred to as money laundering, or RICO. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
238
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 19:22:00 -
[958] - Quote
Herr Kutz wrote:In response to this terrible assumption that isk for clicking a link and buying a GTC is RMT...
Let's leave that response to an official CCP policy statement. Meanwhile our accounts remain unsubbed. |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:29:00 -
[959] - Quote
It's from 2007 but it might as well have been written yesterday 2013 :-)
The New York Times :
"In a Virtual Universe, the Politics Turn Real"
"The kingdom is in crisis. After pledging to treat its citizens equally, the government stands accused of unfairly favoring one powerful, well-connected political faction. Many citizens have taken to open dissent, even revolt, and some are threatening to emigrate permanently."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/arts/07eve.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
 |

Frying Doom
2652
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:43:00 -
[960] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Thanks for your reply, while I do understand and respect your opinion... I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP So lets get one thing 100% clear.
CCP has communicated with you and clearly stated that what you are doing is not RMT, and is not in breach of the EULA? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
393
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 20:47:00 -
[961] - Quote
Herr Kutz wrote:In response to this terrible assumption that isk for clicking a link and buying a GTC is RMT, there is a simple and CLEAR separation.
(Not in order, just read it ffs)
1. SOMER Blink sets up lottery site 2. Markee Dragon sets up GTC selling site 3. Markee Dragon pays SOMER the person RL money for promoting their site
THE END.
It doesn't matter that SOMER is rewarding their patrons with "blink credit". They are being paid for a service provided to Markee Dragon.
This is borne out by the numerous posts claiming that it wouldn't be a problem/wouldn't be RMT if SOMER wasn't giving out credit which can be converted to in game isk.
In case you wonder, this is the opinion of many people who don't frequent the forums who I've spoken to about this. Will they respond to some poll/q'airre? Not a chance.
Doesn't mean their (our) opinion is any less valid than those couple of dozen people who have been spamming this thread for all they're worth.
The essence of RMT'ing is that someone converts in game currency into cash (or a cash equivalent). Each time someone buys a GTC from SOMER, SOMER effectively converts 200 million of real isk into whatever they receive in cash for their referrals. Each step you talk about is a completely legal transaction - correct.
It is when SOMER gives you isk for clicking the button that the RMT occurs. ISK is converted to cash by this system. The whole reason SOMER gives you isk is because it makes them money.
Let me ask you this. If you could turn around and use SOMER bonus isk to outright BUY things (technically you can but it's tough to be fast enough on SOMER, it can definitely be done on EVE-GAMES from what I've seen), would that be RMT?
By the way I am not trolling or being flippant or disrespectful, I am genuinely interested in and respect your opinion here.
Or one step further: can I give someone actual ISK, real isk, for buying GTC's from me? Buy a GTC from me and I give you 200 million isk. Is that RMT?
Because, basically what you are arguing is that because they are paid for the sale of the GTC and not directly for the sale of the isk, they are not RMT'ing. I respect that viewpoint. However, if that is true then I should be able to just cut out all of the voodoo and give away real isk to people who buy GTC's from me and I am not sure that is something CCP wants to see happen.
If you concede that should be allowable, then by all means - that is indeed your opinion and I will respect it. And CCP may agree with you. And if they do, there will probably be quite a few referral programs opening. Actually it would be great for all of the folks who are considering leaving the game as we'd have a 100% legal way to cash out. Maybe not the most profitable, but at least its legal. |

Frying Doom
2653
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:01:00 -
[962] - Quote
If it is legal to offer pretend isk that is convertible into real isk (oh and you can chose all of the blinks when you set the auction your self) with the purchase of a GTC. CCP would be in a very hard position to stop any transaction that comes with fake convertible isk.
So allow me to be the first to say "Welcome to all the Chinese isk farmers", because if this is correct we will soon be buying pens or other merchandise in exchange for isk (well fake isk, but if you can just change it into isk anyway, it is just the same thing). Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2703
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:02:00 -
[963] - Quote
From this thread:
DNSBLACK wrote:Two Step better yet
1. I just sold a GTC to a guy for $2500.00 I gave him 2500 black credits.
2. I just sold another guy a GTC for $17.00 and gave him 2 black credits
3. Both of these guys used the black credits and bought tickets to my charcter raffle.
4. I all ready held the drawing and the winner will be announced soon.
5. I will be starting the legal transfer on the charcter form today.
6. Thank you CCP I made $ 2502 dollars enjoy your 30.00 dollars.
7. I did this with no website. ...and then this:
DNSBLACK wrote:1. Net gain $2475.00.
2. Would like to thank all of you for posting and helping me sell my GTC and black credits. The bumps and advertising was awesome.
3. Please watch the character Bazaar for the final transfer according to all the rules. So either I got trolled big-time or that really just happened.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
353
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:10:00 -
[964] - Quote
Guys keep it up. iam glad CCP has delayed I just sold DNSBlack thru my raffle site and banked $2475.00.
1. Step One I went and purchased 2 / 60 day GTC
2. Thru this web site and forum post I had interested people inquire about my raffle. (One of the guys was a collector of eve famous people and he want my character bad.)
3. Player X purchased a 1 /60 day GTC off of DNS Corp for $2500.00 dollars. I used Pay Pal proxy service for all money exchange. Cost of GTC was 30.00 dollars. For buying my GTC I gave him $2470 DNS Credits
4. Player Y purchased 1 / 60 day GTC off of DNS Corp for $32.00 dollars. I used Pay Pal proxy service for all money exchange Cost of GTC was $30.00 dollars. For buying my GTC I gave her $2 DNS CREDITS
5. I then open the raffle purchasing window and there were 2472 available. They could purchase as many tickets as they like using there black credits.
6. I was sold out in a blink.
7. I then invited them to watch my twitch TV channel and had them join me on eve voice. It was so exciting
9. Each person on the raffle watched me put ther tickets into a official state lottery tumbler.
10. I Then invited my friend over who was a notary to witness the drawing.
11. I then pick the winning ticket live on Skype TV and player X won.
12. Sorry I had to go old school with my lottery and some of you didn't get the chance to participate.
14. I will be transferring the character IE DNSBlack to his new owner over the next 3 days. So if you see him posting in any of these threads it is not me.
15. I would like to thank CCP for making me a trusted partner over the last 7 years. I hope the 60 dollars of game time codes helps you build your business.
16. If you missed out on this last auction no worries I have 5 more characters to raffle off. CCP Falcon has showed me were to post such offers I cant thank him enough for moving my post to this section. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241 All future raffles games to be played will be posted in that section so don't miss out.
|

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
353
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:23:00 -
[965] - Quote
They skillet is hot guys time to cash in on the legal way to make money on ingame stuff. All you have to do is make sure you get your players to buy GTC first CCP has to get there cut. I didn't have time to become a third party so I purchased my GTC at full price. |

Frying Doom
2655
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:24:00 -
[966] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Guys keep it up. iam glad CCP has delayed I just sold DNSBlack thru my raffle site and banked $2475.00. 1. Step One I went and purchased 2 / 60 day GTC 2. Thru this web site and forum post I had interested people inquire about my raffle. (One of the guys was a collector of eve famous people and he wanted my character bad.) 3. Player X purchased a 1 /60 day GTC off of DNS Corp for $2500.00 dollars. I used Pay Pal proxy service for all money exchange. Cost of GTC was 30.00 dollars. For buying my GTC I gave him $2470 DNS Credits 4. Player Y purchased 1 / 60 day GTC off of DNS Corp for $32.00 dollars. I used Pay Pal proxy service for all money exchange Cost of GTC was $30.00 dollars. For buying my GTC I gave her $2 DNS CREDITS 5. I then open the raffle purchasing window and there were 2472 available. They could purchase as many tickets as they like using their DNS credits. 6. The raffle game was sold out in a blink. 7. I then invited them to watch my twitch TV channel and had them join me on eve voice. It was so exciting 9. Each person on the raffle watched me put ther tickets into a official state lottery tumbler. 10. I Then invited my friend over who was a notary to witness the drawing. 11. I then pick the winning ticket live on Skype TV and player X won. 12. Sorry I had to go old school with my lottery and some of you didn't get the chance to participate. 14. I will be transferring the character IE DNSBlack to his new owner over the next 3 days. So if you see him posting in any of these threads it is not me. 15. I would like to thank CCP for making me a trusted partner over the last 7 years. I hope the 60 dollars of game time codes helps you build your business. 16. If you missed out on this last auction no worries I have 5 more characters to raffle off. CCP Falcon has showed me were to post such offers. I cant thank him enough for moving my post to this section. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241 All future raffles games to be played will be posted in that section so don't miss out. 17. I would like to thank the owner of EVE.GAMES.NET who is also a trusted ccp site for this "Thanks for your reply, while I do understand and respect your opinion... I can't set my sites policies based on your interpretation of the EULA. I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP As I have stated previously, if CCP changes the language or asks me to stop the program. I will comply immediately. I also wanted to say, to those that have stated they are so enraged by this that they are quitting the game....STOP, there's no need to do anything drastic. Give CCP time to work out a resolution to this question, whatever that might be. I have been playing this game for years and love it and I can tell from your passion regarding this topic that you love it too." Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value.
Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
158
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:37:00 -
[967] - Quote
interesting. thanks for the update DNSBlack. i wonder how much i could pimp myself out for.  |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
106
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:40:00 -
[968] - Quote
So now I guess all that remains is to figure out how those who aren't officially trusted and endorsed by CCP like Somer and DNSBlack can get in on this.
Oh well. It was fun while it lasted I suppose. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2705
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:41:00 -
[969] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:16. If you missed out on this last auction no worries I have 5 more characters to raffle off. CCP Falcon has showed me were to post such offers. I cant thank him enough for moving my post to this section. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241 All future raffles games to be played will be posted in that section so don't miss out. I still can't believe this. +subscribe and *popcorn* 
|

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:45:00 -
[970] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that 
So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now?
Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable.
|
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
159
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:47:00 -
[971] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now? Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable. if you can't beat them, join them  |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 21:48:00 -
[972] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now? Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable.
It was an EVE style **** you CCP?
|

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
367
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:10:00 -
[973] - Quote
CEO has been transferred, Roles dropped, Left corp, Posted in Character bazzar, Waiting on buyer to confirm, As for DNS raffle game and payments guess what I do not want to break the DNS NDA.
I will be beginning my second DNS Corp character raffle game starting FRI OCT 17, 2013 in HONOR of EVE VEGAS.
LOOK FOR DETAILS IN THIS SECTION OF THE FORUMS: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=2938
This has been approved by CCP FALCON as the proper place for these game raffles to take place.
|

Shai 'Hulud
107
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:16:00 -
[974] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now? Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable. Our claim was that it is a rules violation. But it seems CCP is not applying the rules to this type of "raffle." And further, that SOMER had gained in-game favor due to the success of their RMT scheme. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
239
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:22:00 -
[975] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote: So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now?
Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable.
Again you seem a bit confused about the matter in question. We're not dealing with "player perception" or "grey areas" here. What we're dealing with is a lack of a clear CCP policy about the RMT you and Somer Blink have been doing. In case they come up with a verdict that deems it to be a violation of the current EULA you, Somer Blink and any CCP employee that helped you set up shop or gain influence within the community should still be punished in the same way any other power-abusing CCP employee or RMT'er (that is not giving them GTC sales) was before. That is of course, CCP were down to keep their integrity. |

Frying Doom
2658
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:32:00 -
[976] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now? Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable. I was ranting against it because it appeared to me to be RMT but as you have said CCP has told you that this is legit and above board. Subsequently if it is not RMT and not limited to a select few then it is fine. Personally I think it will be the end of EvE as you can now also buy a GTC and Billions in Black isk that you can convert via a "raffle" into real isk but what do I know. If it is ok by CCP and not limited to who can do it, it is good to go.
So if we can "raffle" our characters of for GTC sales and RL cash, I am all for it.
Oh as to the CCP/CSM survey, I don't think we will be needing that now as I doubt anyone will care. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:36:00 -
[977] - Quote
Have to say this has been quality decision making by CCP in allowing a cash to made up currency to character exchange.
CCP, grow a pair and ban this (and the rmt somer, eve-games and all the rest of them that do it). |

Frying Doom
2661
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 22:59:00 -
[978] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Have to say this has been quality decision making by CCP in allowing a cash to made up currency to character exchange.
CCP, grow a pair and ban this (and the rmt somer, eve-games and all the rest of them that do it). Whats done is done. How unfair would it be if they made it illegal just because others have gotten into it, rather than just the chosen few.
They have let this go on for ages and they just need to suck it up and take it. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:02:00 -
[979] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: I was ranting against it because it appeared to me to be RMT but as you have said CCP has told you that this is legit and above board. Subsequently if it is not RMT and not limited to a select few then it is fine. Personally I think it will be the end of EvE as you can now also buy a GTC and Billions in Black isk that you can convert via a "raffle" into real isk but what do I know. If it is ok by CCP and not limited to who can do it, it is good to go.
So if we can "raffle" our characters of for GTC sales and RL cash, I am all for it.
Oh as to the CCP/CSM survey, I don't think we will be needing that now as I doubt anyone will care.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I never stated CCP has told me this is legit and above board.
What I said was, in essence, if CCP has not ordered a takedown request or reprimanded Blink for the practice (and even assisted them in some cases) than it seems logical to assume they have no issue with it.
|

Shai 'Hulud
109
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:10:00 -
[980] - Quote
I have thrown my hat in the ring  All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
396
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:10:00 -
[981] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Well it is nice to know we can convert our characters back to cash instead of useless isk, especially now as isk will have no value. Thanks DNS BLACK, well done, you will be missed but for 2.5k I really understand that  So after 47 pages of ranting and thinly veiled insults, your ok with it now? Seems a bit hypocritical to be upset when others do something you perceive as wrong, but if you can profit from it.... suddenly it becomes acceptable.
I think you are missing something here... |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3855
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:15:00 -
[982] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:NYT article about EVE Online: It's from 2007 but it might as well have been written yesterday 2013 :-) The New York Times : "In a Virtual Universe, the Politics Turn Real""The kingdom is in crisis. After pledging to treat its citizens equally, the government stands accused of unfairly favoring one powerful, well-connected political faction. Many citizens have taken to open dissent, even revolt, and some are threatening to emigrate permanently."http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/07/arts/07eve.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
My favorite bit:
NY Times wrote: So now CCP plans the radical step of opening itself up to independent oversight: nine player-overseers who will act as ombudsmen for the gameGÇÖs subscribers. The company says it will hold the elections in the fall.
GÇ£I envision this council being made up of nine members selected by the players themselves, where you announce your candidacy, and if you win the election, they come here to Iceland, and they can look at every nook and cranny and get to see that we are here to run this company on a professional basis,GÇ¥ said Mr. Petursson, CCPGÇÖs chief executive. GÇ£They can see that we did not make this game to win it.GÇ¥
Too bad Hilmar was just paying lip service to the NYT, and we never got the CSM as advertised.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

EVE-GAMES
EVE-GAMES.NET
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:17:00 -
[983] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:
What I said was, in essence, I've been getting away with doing this for years, so surely if it was against the EULA CCP would have banned me by now.
FYP.
I lol'ed and liked 
Actually we are new, (Launched in May of this year) and we implemented the GTC + Bonus program to be competitive. It's extremely difficult to gain market share without offering, at least, the same bonuses as other sites.
And for the record....we have never received assistance or gifts or prizes or any other "help" from CCP (some of you seem to be assuming we have)
o7 |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
18
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:19:00 -
[984] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I have thrown my hat in the ring  (see In-Game Events and Gatherings forum)
Dude, no need to be shy, advertise that sale!
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287581&find=unread
|

sally Deninard
mss industry
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:20:00 -
[985] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Doc Fury wrote:EVE-GAMES wrote:
What I said was, in essence, I've been getting away with doing this for years, so surely if it was against the EULA CCP would have banned me by now.
FYP. I lol'ed and liked  Actually we are new, (Launched in May of this year) and we implemented the GTC + Bonus program to be competitive. It's extremely difficult to gain market share without offering, at least, the same bonuses as other sites. And for the record....we have never received assistance or gifts or prizes or any other "help" from CCP (some of you seem to be assuming we have) o7
It`s cool we can lobby to get you a personalized ship like the new SOMER blink faction cruiser in Rubicon.
|

Frying Doom
2664
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:20:00 -
[986] - Quote
EVE-GAMES wrote:Frying Doom wrote: I was ranting against it because it appeared to me to be RMT but as you have said CCP has told you that this is legit and above board. Subsequently if it is not RMT and not limited to a select few then it is fine. Personally I think it will be the end of EvE as you can now also buy a GTC and Billions in Black isk that you can convert via a "raffle" into real isk but what do I know. If it is ok by CCP and not limited to who can do it, it is good to go.
So if we can "raffle" our characters of for GTC sales and RL cash, I am all for it.
Oh as to the CCP/CSM survey, I don't think we will be needing that now as I doubt anyone will care.
Please don't put words in my mouth, I never stated CCP has told me this is legit and above board. What I said was, in essence, if CCP has not ordered a takedown request or reprimanded Blink for the practice (and even assisted them in some cases) than it seems logical to assume they have no issue with it.
EVE-GAMES wrote:I set policy from CCP's interpretation of the EULA. I have yet to see an argument that convinces me that what I and other sites are doing is RMT, and so far....neither has CCP Emphasis Mine
So you are aware of CCPs interpretation but have never communicated with them. Your words not mine.
But I myself are happy to accept your above statement as true.
If you will excuse me I have a character transfer to sort out  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

sally Deninard
mss industry
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:28:00 -
[987] - Quote
Frankly it`s late in the UK and all I can think about is cashing out a couple of freighters in some sort of odd mss creds way to finance 8 budweisers, all above board of course.
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2706
|
Posted - 2013.10.17 23:52:00 -
[988] - Quote
Well... it's interesting to watch this unfold. I don't care about WHAT is done policy-wise... just that the policy be evenly applied. It seems it is being evenly applied. That's refreshing, actually. Assuming I understand what's happening here, I have only two points left:
- If you can sell a character in this way, you can sell anything. This is loophole in the system. However, this game is often ABOUT finding loopholes. You guys are all good at it. So, in effect, everyone will be selling "raffle tickets" via GTCs and then raffling off... what? Blocks of ISK? Gear, items & ships? Obviously characters... for RL cash. Thus, RMT is legal. str8up.
- CCP said it would be a while for their conversations with the company owners to materialize. I would say there's a good bit of time here for this thing to explode. I think a few more of you get away with this and they are going to need a new section of the forums just for "raffles"
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
240
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:10:00 -
[989] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3751264#post3751264
Shai 'Hulud wrote:I am holding a raffle for the following 5 tournament reward ships: Cambion Vangel Malice Freki Utu
To enter, you simply buy a 30 day gtc from me for $1000 USD and you will receive a bonus "shai ticket."...
LMFAO might follow the lead and raffle some shiet myself too |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:12:00 -
[990] - Quote
Time to get this rmt crap stopped dead by taking it to the limit like any good eve player would. Time to kick CCP in the balls just like they did to me by giving somer all that isk for nothing.
edit: cant link the url for some reason, but it is in the In-Game Events and Gatherings thread... |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
160
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 00:13:00 -
[991] - Quote
beating CCP at their own metagame. i love it  |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4422
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 01:13:00 -
[992] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Time to get this rmt crap stopped dead by taking it to the limit like any good eve player would. Time to kick CCP in the balls just like they did to me by giving somer all that isk for nothing.
edit: cant link the url for some reason, but it is in the In-Game Events and Gatherings thread...
Ah ah ah this new chain of "raffles" is the best "players poll" the CSM could want to setup.
Some are already replying with unsub, others by exploiting the loophole.
A classic in EvE history and a players poll filled in with a facts pen, before it's even presented  Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2710
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:16:00 -
[993] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3751264#post3751264 Shai 'Hulud wrote:I am holding a raffle for the following 5 tournament reward ships: Cambion Vangel Malice Freki Utu
To enter, you simply buy a 30 day gtc from me for $1000 USD and you will receive a bonus "shai ticket."... LMFAO  might follow the lead and raffle some shiet myself too If you do the math, the time you spent getting those awesome ships... for even 5 grand... is well below minim wage. Must be a minmatar slave RPer...
|

Paul Tsukaya
Dirt 'n' Glitter I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
27
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:18:00 -
[994] - Quote
I'll be shocked if I don't wake up tomorrow to find the DNSBlack character biomassed.
Whoever brought the character from you for cash (even though they will try and ague that's not what took place) will look like an idiot. |

Ship Toaster
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:27:00 -
[995] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
The DNSBlack thing has never been allowed. |

Frying Doom
2666
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:28:00 -
[996] - Quote
Paul Tsukaya wrote:I'll be shocked if I don't wake up tomorrow to find the DNSBlack character biomassed.
Whoever brought the character from you for cash (even though they will try and ague that's not what took place) will look like an idiot. How? That would mean CCP having to admit that it has been letting companies like Somer Blink get away with RMT for ages and if they did that they would have no recourse other than to confiscate all of somers in game assets and remove the RMT amounts from all those who profited from the RMT(being Somer's staff and anyone who bought a GTC from Somer)
This is why you have to be careful playing favorites in the sand box. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Shai 'Hulud
114
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 02:30:00 -
[997] - Quote
Gogela wrote:raven666wings wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3751264#post3751264 Shai 'Hulud wrote:I am holding a raffle for the following 5 tournament reward ships: Cambion Vangel Malice Freki Utu
To enter, you simply buy a 30 day gtc from me for $1000 USD and you will receive a bonus "shai ticket."... LMFAO  might follow the lead and raffle some shiet myself too If you do the math, the time you spent getting those awesome ships... for even 5 grand... is well below minim wage. Must be a minmatar slave RPer... A lot of assumptions there. I think "master" would be a more apt description than slave  All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
372
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:19:00 -
[998] - Quote
Hey CCP; DNS just set you RED and welcome to the sand box. Somer is a enemy of DNS and you have them set blue please
take a look in your lobby it is time to PVP.
http://i.imgur.com/Hk1UAInh.jpg
Yes I have control of this charcter still waiting for my eastern block friends to wakr up and drink some coffee. |

Daktar Jaxs
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
37
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:22:00 -
[999] - Quote
poor ole CCP, just keep slipping over and ending up with their own **** in their ass |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2713
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:34:00 -
[1000] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:A lot of assumptions there. I think "master" would be a more apt description than slave  Possibly. All I know about it is what I see on the forums. I have all the non-uniqe ships, save titans (for which I get BPCs... but my ship collection includes: Guardian-Vexor Freki Mimir Utu Adrestia Malice Vengal Cambion
These ships average about 70 bil atm.
So a grand is a pretty low-ball estimate of what they are worth. I'm thinking about buying that set of ships in fact.
|
|

Daionnis
Money Crew
28
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:44:00 -
[1001] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Hey CCP; DNS just set you RED and welcome to the sand box. Somer is a enemy of DNS and you have them set blue please take a look in your lobby it is time to PVP. http://i.imgur.com/Hk1UAInh.jpgYes I still have control of this charcter still waiting for my eastern block friends to wakr up and drink some coffee.
Holy crap!
A personal wardec! |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2713
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 04:48:00 -
[1002] - Quote
Daionnis wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Hey CCP; DNS just set you RED and welcome to the sand box. Somer is a enemy of DNS and you have them set blue please take a look in your lobby it is time to PVP. http://i.imgur.com/Hk1UAInh.jpgYes I still have control of this charcter still waiting for my eastern block friends to wakr up and drink some coffee. Holy crap! A personal wardec! It's funny you say that. I think the players, with this legitimized RMT thing, just wardeced CCP.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
241
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 05:00:00 -
[1003] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287597&find=unreadRead this and substitute 6 billion ISK free with that gtc that costs $105... edit: using some fake currency and fake raffle to avoid rmt entanglements of course...  edit: and check out the 'Tournament Prize Ships Raffle' thread too for your chance to buy, eh, I mean raffle unique ships!
Dayum dude... howcome you undercutting your plex so low??? $8.75 a pop (minus the 1/12 of the GTC value)?? for real?? dayum... I was gonna raffle some plex packs too but not gonna compete with that price... won't go lower than $13 a pop  |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
167
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 05:08:00 -
[1004] - Quote
Ship Toaster wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
The DNSBlack thing has never been allowed. he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character. |

xxVastorxx
Abh Empire Ex Cinere Scriptor
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 07:13:00 -
[1005] - Quote
Giveing them a free trip to fanfest would of been a better option. |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 07:26:00 -
[1006] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:interesting. thanks for the update DNSBlack. i wonder how much i could pimp myself out for. 
As the owner of the char "Daquaris" whom to my knowledge is the only one to have ever ripped blink AND chribba (thanks for that tower, next time scoop faster) off, I was wondering the same thing.
$1500 in Uncle Daq's Lucky funtime super happy not isk lotto tickets sounds about right to me. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2515
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 07:35:00 -
[1007] - Quote
I think I love you guys.
Hmm. Scatim just passed 103m SP, I wonder what I could "raffle" him off for. CCP: Not out to ruin your game, out to ruin their game. |

Anton Menges Saddat
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
39
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 07:48:00 -
[1008] - Quote
ITT: CCP learns what happens when keeping it real goes wrong  |

Herr Kutz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:01:00 -
[1009] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:oh and you can chose all of the blinks when you set the auction your self
Actually, no you can't. When starting a blink you can only choose one ticket. If you are fast AND lucky, you can get sufficient tickets to dramatically increase your odds of winning, but you will very rarely see one blink completed by one person because of the speed other people playing will click on the tickets. |

Frying Doom
2677
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:11:00 -
[1010] - Quote
Herr Kutz wrote:Frying Doom wrote:oh and you can chose all of the blinks when you set the auction your self Actually, no you can't. When starting a blink you can only choose one ticket. If you are fast AND lucky, you can get sufficient tickets to dramatically increase your odds of winning, but you will very rarely see one blink completed by one person because of the speed other people playing will click on the tickets. Did they change it. I know you used to be able to and there was a stink over someone laundering their money via Somer by buying all of the blinks.
either way around it means that you are more than likely to get some of the blink isk converted into real isk, the actual decline percentage matters little. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Chiimera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:13:00 -
[1011] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Hey CCP; DNS just set you RED and welcome to the sand box. Somer is a enemy of DNS and you have them set blue please take a look in your lobby it is time to PVP. http://i.imgur.com/Hk1UAInh.jpgYes I still have control of this charcter still waiting for my eastern block friends to wakr up and drink some coffee.
Pictures of my bro DNSBlack ITT https://i.imgur.com/d3pLnfi.jpg |

sally Deninard
mss industry
75
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:21:00 -
[1012] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote: The one thing that is entirely predictable is that no matter what, CSM will get sh*t on. (potential future candidates, take note!)
WRT to the politician analogy made a few posts back, keep in mind that CCP isn't a politician, CCP is the King. The King gets to set the rules, and if the King decides to change the rules, he does so by divine right.
CSM gets to tell the King, "Your Majesty, we believe what you are doing is bad for the Kingdom."
1) The second and third sentences tell in a nutshell why CSM is a weak approach. It's a lot better than zero, but you guys get bypassed at whim, because CSM not only lacks of "veto" powers but also lacks of simple "visibility on everything" powers. Thus flying dogpiles can happily go for the fan without you being shown them.
A common misconception about power is that people believe once they are gifted it they can retain it without any effort. The reason the CSM have no power is because they do not try to dominate with pack mentality and solidarity. (i`m looking at you in this case Teg). If this doesn`t work they need to gain support from a high powered group (ie players) , giving them power by proxy. Then they can apply dominance.
The CSM has no power because they choose to have no power and hide behind the excuse of NDA`s etc as if CCP has them tied up in legal knots. Balderdash.... they can lobby player support, without telling players what the next SOMER paintjob looks like.
"it`s like taking a knife to a gunfight " is implying that someone lost an engagement by being ill prepared or not equally capable, the man with the gun has the power. There are kings amongst men who can enter a gunfight unarmed and de-escalate to a peaceful resolution, in turn they can enter peaceful negotiations with an assault rifle. These are the true holders of power. All this CSM has no power QQ is bullshit, you are weak because you do not act , lobby or attack. |

Chiimera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:26:00 -
[1013] - Quote
SHENANIGANS! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:32:00 -
[1014] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Ship Toaster wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
The DNSBlack thing has never been allowed. he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character. Going by dnsblack's character selling process, you have to enter the lottery to be able to buy the character. It is an intrinsic part of the process of buying the character. You can argue all you want about semantics, but if CCP decide that the quoted part of the ToS apply to the whole process and not just the final exchange step, expect bio massed characters and many many tears. If this happens, anyone who gets upset about it should realise it's not a court of law but a court of CCP and their mighty swinging todger of doom. |

Frying Doom
2677
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 08:36:00 -
[1015] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:Ship Toaster wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
The DNSBlack thing has never been allowed. he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character. Going by dnsblack's character selling process, you have to enter the lottery to be able to buy the character. It is an intrinsic part of the process of buying the character. You can argue all you want about semantics, but if CCP decide that the quoted part of the ToS apply to the whole process and not just the final exchange step, expect bio massed characters and many many tears. If this happens, anyone who gets upset about it should realise it's not a court of law but a court of CCP and their mighty swinging todger of doom. Should that happen I think people would be rightfully pissed.
You can do that with isk/ships/plex/items/skillbooks but not characters. It would not just look like but be CCP playing favorites again. Except this time it would be them determining who is allowed to run a lottery. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:03:00 -
[1016] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote: Going by dnsblack's character selling process, you have to enter the lottery to be able to buy the character. It is an intrinsic part of the process of buying the character. You can argue all you want about semantics, but if CCP decide that the quoted part of the ToS apply to the whole process and not just the final exchange step, expect bio massed characters and many many tears. If this happens, anyone who gets upset about it should realise it's not a court of law but a court of CCP and their mighty swinging todger of doom.
Should that happen I think people would be rightfully pissed. You can do that with isk/ships/plex/items/skillbooks but not characters. It would not just look like but be CCP playing favorites again. Except this time it would be them determining who is allowed to run a lottery.
Or alternatively you could view it as being a very sensible measure to have in place because sale & transfer of characters is a considerably different beast when compared to say, a Damage Control II (soundwave might like that reference). As far as I know, the "no lottery" rule for selling characters has been around for many years. Getting upset about it now is somewhat silly. Accounts / characters must surely have as much protection as possible.
It's a shame that dnsblack didn't make his point by selling say, an iScorp (lovely irony!) using this method as things would get really interesting. As it is, CCP could, if they so choose to, easily justify a ban hammer and bio mass due to it being a character sale. However, now that players are selling limited edition ships via the lottery / RL money method, I'm looking forward to see what ccp shall do. |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:15:00 -
[1017] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287597&find=unreadRead this and substitute 6 billion ISK free with that gtc that costs $105... edit: using some fake currency and fake raffle to avoid rmt entanglements of course...  edit: and check out the 'Tournament Prize Ships Raffle' thread too for your chance to buy, eh, I mean raffle unique ships! Dayum dude... howcome you undercutting your plex so low??? $8.75 a pop (minus the 1/12 of the GTC value)?? for real??  dayum... I was gonna raffle some plex packs too but not gonna compete with that price... won't go lower than $13 a pop 
lol, not like I need to make a massive real life profit as all I want to do is shove CCP's nose in it so they dont **** in the house again...
|

Frying Doom
2679
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:16:00 -
[1018] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: Or alternatively you could view it as being a very sensible measure to have in place because sale & transfer of characters is a considerably different beast when compared to say, a Damage Control II (soundwave might like that reference). As far as I know, the "no lottery" rule for selling characters has been around for many years. Getting upset about it now is somewhat silly. Accounts / characters must surely have as much protection as possible.
It's a shame that dnsblack didn't make his point by selling say, an iScorp (lovely irony!) using this method as things would get really interesting. As it is, CCP could, if they so choose to, easily justify a ban hammer and bio mass due to it being a character sale. However, now that players are selling limited edition ships via the lottery / RL money method, I'm looking forward to see what ccp shall do.
There is a great deal of difference between a character and an item. The damage done by selling items for example 600 plex via this method is a lot more damaging to the game and if they included the whole process people would rightfully be asking why they don't include the whole process for the others and especially the gambling sites that started this. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Lady Cleopatra Ollerenshaw
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:40:00 -
[1019] - Quote
I haven't laughed this much since Aunt Maude used the wrong croquet mallet!  |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 09:56:00 -
[1020] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:Ship Toaster wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
The DNSBlack thing has never been allowed. he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character. Going by dnsblack's character selling process, you have to enter the lottery to be able to buy the character. It is an intrinsic part of the process of buying the character. You can argue all you want about semantics, but if CCP decide that the quoted part of the ToS apply to the whole process and not just the final exchange step, expect bio massed characters and many many tears. If this happens, anyone who gets upset about it should realise it's not a court of law but a court of CCP and their mighty swinging todger of doom. Should that happen I think people would be rightfully pissed. You can do that with isk/ships/plex/items/skillbooks but not characters. It would not just look like but be CCP playing favorites again. Except this time it would be them determining who is allowed to run a lottery.
Yo Handsome, there was no paid lottery for a character at any stage. So no buying of a character was ever part of this process.
The lottery was a freebie for those who buy gtc, an incentive to buy from DNS; the cash for GTC is separate from the lottery. The cash for gtc is legal. The offering of freebies via made up currency to boost your sales is legal. Link these two together and you have a winner.
This is the legal sleight of hand that makes rmt into not-rmt.
This is what we do not like.
Oh, and buy my plex twelve pack at 50% the price of CCP's! What about an ISK injection? I do those too... Get those unique ships you always dreamed about. Check out the 'In-Game Events and Gatherings' part of this very forum as that is where CCP said these EVE stuffz to fake currency to raffle to $$$ should go.
|
|

Frying Doom
2680
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:02:00 -
[1021] - Quote
I won't slag you off for missing the point.
But I must say people should buy those legalized plex.
Nice deal.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287602&find=unread Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:11:00 -
[1022] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I won't slag you off for missing the point.
lol, if it was me got to apologise but am a bit distracted as I was writing a new post to increase the absurdity level of this... DarkDecay is EVE's oldest and most trusted Plex and ISK conversion service. You got the $$$ I got the stuffz! |

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
23
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:16:00 -
[1023] - Quote
You know CCP, you can play the "we are assessing the situation" card as long as you want now. This is certainly turning out to be something which is very interesting... and definitely historical.  |

Frying Doom
2681
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:17:00 -
[1024] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I won't slag you off for missing the point. lol, if it was me got to apologise but am a bit distracted as I was writing a new post to increase the absurdity level of this... What a lottery for interflora flowers with 50 plex, all for just a $500 GTC.
Why the flowers? So you can give them to your wife when she realizes what it cost?  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

CCP Falcon
4218

|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:20:00 -
[1025] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:16. If you missed out on this last auction no worries I have 5 more characters to raffle off. CCP Falcon has showed me were to post such offers. I cant thank him enough for moving my post to this section. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241 All future raffles games to be played will be posted in that section so don't miss out.
Please read the whole post in your thread :
CCP Falcon wrote:This thread is being moved to the Ingame Events and Gatherings sub-forum. Our customer support team is also in the process of reviewing this particular style of raffle to ensure it conforms with our rules and policies. 
Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice. Don't put words in my mouth in future.
CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:28:00 -
[1026] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:
Yo Handsome, there was no paid lottery for a character at any stage. So no buying of a character was ever part of this process.
The lottery was a freebie for those who buy gtc, an incentive to buy from DNS; the cash for GTC is separate from the lottery. The cash for gtc is legal. The offering of freebies via made up currency to boost your sales is legal. Link these two together and you have a winner.
Yo decaying dude, *fistbumps* etc. I dig what some people is on about innit. But character exchange + lottery ain't good bruv.
Quote:you have to enter the lottery to be able to buy the character. It is an intrinsic part of the process of buying the character. You can argue all you want about semantics, but if CCP decide that the quoted part of the ToS apply to the whole process and not just the final exchange step, expect bio massed characters and many many tears.
If it aint in yo head yet, money must've been traded b4 character exchange. Process, wonga, character, sale, semantics n all that innit. u geddit yo decaying dude?
DarkDecay wrote:This is the legal sleight of hand that makes rmt into not-rmt.
*sucks teef*
Quote:anyone who gets upset about it should realise it's not a court of law but a court of CCP and their mighty swinging todger of doom.
Quote:It's a shame that dnsblack didn't make his point by selling say, an iScorp (lovely irony!) using this method as things would get really interesting. As it is, CCP could, if they so choose to, easily justify a ban hammer and bio mass due to it being a character sale.
nuff reespeck o/ |

Frying Doom
2681
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:33:00 -
[1027] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:
Yo decaying dude, *fistbumps* etc. I dig what some people is on about innit. But character exchange + lottery ain't good bruv.
If it aint in yo head yet, money must've been traded b4 character exchange. Process, wonga, character n all that innit. u geddit yo decaying dude?
nuff reespeck o/
/ flat documentary style speech "This is of course how most of the world views the English language skills of most people educated in the United States of America." Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

CCP Falcon
4219

|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:34:00 -
[1028] - Quote
Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future. CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Team -á || -á EVE Illuminati -á || -á Live Events Organizer
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:38:00 -
[1029] - Quote
Handsome, to those of us who dont like this situation at all this is definitely, 100%, absolutely, hands down, rmt. It is just sad that CCP cant see it instantly as rmt like we do. The only time $$$ enter the process is to legally buy an overpriced gtc, we all know that it was really $$$ for character (or ISK in the somer model) but CCP just wont see it that way.
The somer defence is bad, but the eve-games dude saying it is ok because ccp have not stopped it shows how messed up this all is. DarkDecay is EVE's oldest and most trusted Plex and ISK conversion service. You got the $$$ I got the stuffz! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:38:00 -
[1030] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:
Yo decaying dude, *fistbumps* etc. I dig what some people is on about innit. But character exchange + lottery ain't good bruv.
If it aint in yo head yet, money must've been traded b4 character exchange. Process, wonga, character n all that innit. u geddit yo decaying dude?
nuff reespeck o/
/ flat documentary style speech "This is of course how most of the world views the English language skills of most people educated in the United States of America." 
Just trying the "fitting in with the crowd to help them understand what I'm saying" method of communication. Sometimes one has to stoop to levels of the recipient for the message to be heard.
Edit: That wasn't from the USA btw. Try it it a Sarf Larndern accent. |
|

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:41:00 -
[1031] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
This should never be a topic. RMT is wrong, remove it from eve. DarkDecay is EVE's oldest and most trusted Plex and ISK conversion service. You got the $$$ I got the stuffz! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:43:00 -
[1032] - Quote
DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character. |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 10:51:00 -
[1033] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character as that pitches players into the potential "legal" rmt.
Got the accent btw :P
The character was never sold but only transferred. That is the sad point here. By breaking the rmt process up into smaller steps, that are all seen by CCP as legal, it appears you can bypass all the rules. This is not good and needs stomped on immediately. DarkDecay is EVE's oldest and most trusted Plex and ISK conversion service. You got the $$$ I got the stuffz! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:02:00 -
[1034] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:
Got the accent btw :P
The character was never sold but only transferred. That is the sad point here. By breaking the rmt process up into smaller steps, that are all seen by CCP as legal, it appears you can bypass all the rules. This is not good and needs stomped on immediately.
Agreed, but I'll wait and see what CCP choose to do against dnsblack for the character "exchange" (sale). I'd personally be surprised if they'll let it slide as they are usually red hot on keeping character sales legit. They have a clause in the ToS aimed directly at character sales with which they could justify harsh action. In game items, plex, etc. though... that's going to be interesting and could well force a change in their outlook as that specific character clause doesn't apply to them. |

DarkDecay
The Scope Gallente Federation
46
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:22:00 -
[1035] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
Dear CCP Falcon,
How much would an endorsement of my business model cost? You know the one where I sell for $$$ plex or ISK on this very forum in the place you said these types of threads should go.
Currently my profits are only $300 so do you offer an endorsement package a bit cheaper than the absolute endorsement package that somer got?
I cant really afford somer's endorsement, that was like an in the middle of the superbowl or world cup final $10million tv advert that they got (you know the we trust and endorse somer completely and they are the greatest thing since sliced bread one), so what can I get for $300?
Cheers, DD DarkDecay is EVE's oldest and most trusted Plex and ISK conversion service. You got the $$$ I got the stuffz!
More details here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3753027#post3753027 |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
392
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:28:00 -
[1036] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
I was giving you credit for moving it and showing that section to me. I was pointing out by you moving it how my exposure was increased with the blue tag. I would never want to put words in your mouth, beers yes words no. |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
392
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 11:33:00 -
[1037] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character as that pitches players into the potential "legal" rmt.
Do me a favor and show me the evidence. Build your case against me I would love to here it. |

Frying Doom
2684
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 12:20:00 -
[1038] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character as that pitches players into the potential "legal" rmt. Do me a favor and show me the evidence. Build your case against me I would love to here it. I believe it is to be titled: The case of the Mighty Pork Sword.
Sounds like a badly written Sherlock Holmes mystery to me.  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1458
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 12:41:00 -
[1039] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:DNSBLACK wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character as that pitches players into the potential "legal" rmt. Do me a favor and show me the evidence. Build your case against me I would love to here it. I believe it is to be titled: The case of the Mighty Pork Sword. Sounds like a badly written Sherlock Holmes mystery to me. 
Sherlock Holmes did porno?
Or was that John Holmes? This is not a signature. |

Anton Menges Saddat
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
42
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:09:00 -
[1040] - Quote
He's the hero New Eden deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we'll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he's not our hero. He's a silent guardian. A watchful protector. A DNSBlack. |
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4431
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:25:00 -
[1041] - Quote
adarma wrote:You know CCP, you can play the "we are assessing the situation" card as long as you want now. This is certainly turning out to be something which is very interesting... and definitely historical. 
They say EvE players are bad, terrible people, almost psychos. And the community is a cesspool.
But then...
... enter these situations. They are a PEARL in the boring and grey MMOs playerbases landscape.
EvE players are collectively GENIUS and in case of these emergencies they brainstorm together... and then they pull these hat tricks like those raffles. And effectively grab CCP by the balls, because they wanted to take it easy, long, and make it forget.
But nope, players have crossed the Rubicon themselves and this will create some nice PvD (Players vs Devs) content! Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

DarkDecay
Real money traders
61
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 13:47:00 -
[1042] - Quote
Damn, my new sig informing people I am now the number one plex for $$$ 'raffler' in EVE sig is gone :(
edit: my new corp name survives though \o/
edit: so many missing posts too :( |

Konrad Kane
GoonWaffe
77
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 14:24:00 -
[1043] - Quote
I've done some maths. Black would need to sel...erm...raffle four characters per year to cover his fanfest bar tab.
PLEX for jagerbombs the man is a genius - the legend lives on. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
399
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 14:32:00 -
[1044] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
I told DNSBlack to stop putting things in mouth too. He refuses to listen. |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 14:40:00 -
[1045] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:DarkDecay, I know, however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules to justify wielding their mighty pork sword. hence why I said it's a shame that dns didn't do it with an iScorp and not a character as that pitches players into the potential "legal" rmt. Do me a favor and show me the evidence. Build your case against me I would love to hear it.
OK, first do me a favour and read this to understand where I'm coming from. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3752651#post3752651
I can't be arsed to spend more than 5 minutes on this, so here goes.
CCP Rules from https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=6369&find=unread
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
Some preemptions:
Please don't argue semantics. It's up to CCP to decide what they mean by their rules. Example: Raffle is probably encompassed under "lottery style" etc. etc. Semantics Shemantics. It's CCP's rules.
Evidence from your post here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3750771#post3750771 with some iterations by me.
2. Thru this web site and forum post I had interested people inquire about my raffle. You're holding a lottery. You MUST enter the lottery in order to "win" the character.
3. Player X purchased a 1 /60 day GTC off of DNS Corp for $2500.00 dollars. I used Pay Pal proxy service for all money exchange. Cost of GTC was 30.00 dollars. For buying my GTC I gave him $2470 DNS Credits. You receive a Real Money Transfer. The buyer receives, among other things, lottery tickets. Real money HAS to be paid in order to receive lottery ticket.
... stuff ... (loved point 6 btw)
11. I then pick the winning ticket live on Twitch TV and player X won. You pick the winning ticket from your lottery style thingamy-.
... stuff ...
14. I will be transferring the character IE DNSBlack to his new owner over the next 3 days. The person who purchased the winning ticket (among other things) from you gets the character.
A succinct "black box" summary of your process:
Input = Real Money Transfer to you. Process = A lottery style game for those who paid you money. No money, no lottery ticket. Output = Transfer of character to Person who paid real life money for the winning lottery ticket (+ other things).
Again, CCP's rules:
Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
What you did was neither an auction or a buyout but exceptionally close to being "lottery style". That's why here https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3752755#post3752755 I said:
Quote:It's a shame that dnsblack didn't make his point by selling say, an iScorp (lovely irony!) using this method as things would get really interesting. As it is, CCP could, if they so choose to, easily justify a ban hammer and bio mass due to it being a character sale.
AFAIK, CCP don't have the lottery rule for other stuff, just characters.
Good luck and if CCP manage to make their T's & C's bullet proof because of this, I'll buy you a pint or 2. Think I'm safe there! |

Frying Doom
2711
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 14:56:00 -
[1046] - Quote
Let us be clear on what that page says At the top it says: "In an effort to reduce the amount of character scams, GM workload and player frustration, the following changes are being made to the announcements concerning character sales or auctions for ISK. No other form of trade is sanctioned or supported. " and the bottom of that post says: "Agreements on the forums or in game, or winning an auction does not guarantee a character will be transferred to you. The seller may choose to renege on a deal at any time, prior to the transaction being completed"
While the EULA says
EULA wrote:ACCOUNT TRANSFER / CHARACTER TRANSFER You are not permitted to transfer your Account to another person. If you wish to discontinue your Account please refer to section 6. of this EULA. You may transfer a character from your Account to another account, either belonging to you or another person. This transfer option is available from the EVE Online Account Management web site https://secure.eveonline.com/ and is subject to fees and the following limitations: You may not offer to transfer characters except your own, or act as a "broker" or intermediary (for compensation or otherwise) for anyone wishing to transfer or obtain characters. The transferee will obtain all rights to your character in a single transaction, and you will retain absolutely no control or rights over the characters, items or attributes of that character. You may not transfer any characters whose attributes are, in whole or in part, developed, or which own items, objects or currency obtained or acquired, in violation of the EULA. Any character transfers or attempted transfers not in accordance with the foregoing terms is prohibited and void, and shall not be binding on CCP. A transfer or attempted transfer of a character is entirely at the risk of the parties to such transaction. CCP is not liable to any person (whether transferor, transferee or otherwise) for any acts, omissions, statements, representations, defaults or liabilities of the parties in connection with such a transaction.
So rule 17 is a forum rule, while the EULA makes no mention of this.
But as I said in another post, this is not a legal ting this is a community matter and CCP would look daft going against this while it letting slight of hand RMT occur. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
246
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:03:00 -
[1047] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character.
You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for charachter exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts. |

Mordachai
Nex Exercitus Against ALL Authorities
1
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:12:00 -
[1048] - Quote
A) Will the outcome of those surveys be presented to the public ?
B) How will people get to know about those surveys if they arent forum warriors ? (maybe eve-mail the whole community like ccp did with the CSM voting)
C) Will the changes(if any) just come as a tiny fine print in the EULA that nobody reads or will it be announced so people will know about it? |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:18:00 -
[1049] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character. You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all tranferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms.
You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
247
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:21:00 -
[1050] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character.
You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP. |
|

Frying Doom
2716
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:21:00 -
[1051] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character. You know that looks a lot like
- Buy GTC get bonus credit
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Transfer credit into isk
But that can't be right as that would be RMT and that is expressly forbidden under the EULA Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
170
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:25:00 -
[1052] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character. You know that looks a lot like
- Buy GTC get bonus credit
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Transfer credit into isk
But that can't be right as that would be RMT and that is expressly forbidden under the EULA  careful, you might make his head spin  |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:26:00 -
[1053] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character. You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP.
No I'm not missing the point. I understand that. You are missing what I have been pointing out all along. Character transfers / sales have different rules to ships etc.
Show me where Somer Blink has held a lottery for a character.
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:28:00 -
[1054] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character. You know that looks a lot like
- Buy GTC get bonus credit
- Buy Lottery Tickets
- Transfer credit into isk
But that can't be right as that would be RMT and that is expressly forbidden under the EULA 
17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
Not sure I can do any more than that. |

Shai 'Hulud
122
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:28:00 -
[1055] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:This thread is being moved to the Ingame Events and Gatherings sub-forum. Our customer support team is also in the process of reviewing this particular style of raffle to ensure it conforms with our rules and policies. 
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic. Right. Allowing his raffle to proceed to it's completion was in no way an endorsement 
By admitting that you are reviewing these practices, you acknowledged it is not currently considered a rules violation. If it was, you would shut down SOMER's RMT and you wouldn't need to have a ******* discussion.
The clock is ticking CCP... our balls are in your court. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
248
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:30:00 -
[1056] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: No I'm not missing the point. I understand that. You are missing what I have been pointing out all along. Character transfers / sales have different rules to ships etc.
Show me where Somer Blink has held a lottery for a character.
Yes, once again you are still missing the point, and I advise you to read the full thread before making such comments.
They do indeed have different rules - and that difference is in the means of selling and transfer (in-game vs character bazaar forum section) - which doesn't mean DNSBlack didn't follow them. He sold the character according to the CCP designated means for character sales/transfers. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
171
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:31:00 -
[1057] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:This thread is being moved to the Ingame Events and Gatherings sub-forum. Our customer support team is also in the process of reviewing this particular style of raffle to ensure it conforms with our rules and policies.  CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic. Right. Allowing his raffle to proceed to it's completion was in no way an endorsement  By admitting that you are reviewing these practices, you acknowledged it is not currently considered a rules violation. If it was, you would shut down SOMER's RMT and you wouldn't need to have a ******* discussion. The clock is ticking CCP... our balls are in your court. now that the equation has changed, i no longer care how long CCP takes to formulate their response... winter is coming, but til then, get those raffles up  |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
250
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:36:00 -
[1058] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character. Not sure I can do any more than that.
Well. you got stuck in the same point and getting repetitive now, besides people already having explained to you why you're wrong. I hope you didn't get brain damage of some sort.
Not sure It will help repeating this to you again:
raven666wings wrote:You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all tranferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms. |

Frying Doom
2721
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:39:00 -
[1059] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character. Not sure I can do any more than that. Maybe list the part in the EULA where it states that rather than in the rules for a forum would be a good start. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:42:00 -
[1060] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Handsome Feller wrote: No I'm not missing the point. I understand that. You are missing what I have been pointing out all along. Character transfers / sales have different rules to ships etc.
Show me where Somer Blink has held a lottery for a character.
Yes, once again you are still missing the point, and I advise you to read the full thread before making such comments. They do indeed have different rules - and that difference is in the means of selling and transfer (in-game vs character bazaar forum section) - which doesn't mean DNSBlack didn't follow them. He sold the character according to the CCP designated means for character sales/transfers. Somer Blink might indeed have not raffled buyouts for character sales but they could do it, as long as they use the same CCP designated character bazaar forum section to transfer them.
You're going round in circles. No point continuing. It's summarised thusly:
I suggest CCP can say that holding lottery that you must enter in order to be able to buy a character is flouting the no "lottery style" rule when buying characters.
You say, He's doing exactly the same as Somer (which he isn't because *character*) or it doesn't matter because there are additional steps between lottery and character buying.
The End. |
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:45:00 -
[1061] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character. Not sure I can do any more than that. Maybe list the part in the EULA where it states that rather than in the rules for a forum would be a good start.
But you'll still equate the rules around / Ts&Cs around ship lotteries to the rules for selling a character because that's what you've done thus far. I can't help you anymore until you realize that CCP treat these things differently. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
252
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:48:00 -
[1062] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: You're going round in circles. No point continuing. It's summarised thusly:
I suggest CCP can say that holding lottery that you must enter in order to be able to buy a character is flouting the no "lottery style" rule when buying characters.
You say, He's doing exactly the same as Somer (which he isn't because *character*) or it doesn't matter because there are additional steps between lottery and character buying.
The End.
Lol you definitely should have read the thread before fallin here in a parachute. It's is not me or the guys who are setting up raffles that "are going in circles", It was Somer Blink and others. We're simply using our right to engage in the same conduct that has not only been unsanctioned but also supported and advertised by CCP.
PS - You should consider writing english in further posts. What you wrote after "you're going in circles" didn't make any sense. |

Frying Doom
2724
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:48:00 -
[1063] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character. Not sure I can do any more than that. Maybe list the part in the EULA where it states that rather than in the rules for a forum would be a good start. But you'll still equate the rules around / Ts&Cs around ship lotteries to the rules for selling a character because that's what you've done thus far. I can't help you anymore until you realize that CCP treat these things differently. There is a section in the EULA on character transfers and another on RMT.
Maybe you would like to quote the section on character transfers rather than forum rules as it is more relevant. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3143
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:53:00 -
[1064] - Quote
Mordachai wrote:A) Will the outcome of those surveys be presented to the public ?
B) How will people get to know about those surveys if they arent forum warriors ? (maybe eve-mail the whole community like ccp did with the CSM voting)
C) Will the changes(if any) just come as a tiny fine print in the EULA that nobody reads or will it be announced so people will know about it? A) The forum one, for sure. CCP's version, I hope so, but it's up to them.
B) We are working on getting some messaging on the forum version.
C) I'm sure it will be announced. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
175
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 15:57:00 -
[1065] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Mordachai wrote:A) Will the outcome of those surveys be presented to the public ?
B) How will people get to know about those surveys if they arent forum warriors ? (maybe eve-mail the whole community like ccp did with the CSM voting)
C) Will the changes(if any) just come as a tiny fine print in the EULA that nobody reads or will it be announced so people will know about it? A) The forum one, for sure. CCP's version, I hope so, but it's up to them. B) We are working on getting some messaging on the forum version. C) I'm sure it will be announced. why do i feel like the 'winter summit' plans are now going to be pushed up to... say, this coming week? 
'watch what they do, not what they say'... people are starting to vote with their wallets now.
as for the survey, no thanks. some of us have very little faith that the survey will present the real issues and ask non-biased/skewed questions. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
404
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 16:00:00 -
[1066] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:This thread is being moved to the Ingame Events and Gatherings sub-forum. Our customer support team is also in the process of reviewing this particular style of raffle to ensure it conforms with our rules and policies.  CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic. Right. Allowing his raffle to proceed to it's completion was in no way an endorsement  By admitting that you are reviewing these practices, you acknowledged it is not currently considered a rules violation. If it was, you would shut down SOMER's RMT and you wouldn't need to have a ******* discussion. The clock is ticking CCP... our balls are in your court.
The primary argument of the FTC RMT'ers have given to defend the validity of their practice is that CCP hasn't stopped it. And I have to say, I agree with them - unless CCP was ignorant of it then the fact that nothing has been done thus far to stop it basically amounts to approval.
You had every chance to stop DNSBlack's auction, but instead you moved it to the proper forum. It is not that ridiculous to assume then, that at the time you moved his post - you saw no potential violation of the EULA. If you had, you would have coursed stepped in and stopped it no?
CCP - I hope you realize that even though the issue has turned to RMT, your biggest mistake in all this was endorsing SOMER in the first place.
You failed to stay above the fray. You failed to remain untouchable and aloof. You failed to remain objective adjudicators of your own game. To use an EVE analogy: you set SOMERblink blue. CCP has no business setting anyone blue; they have no business picking winners.
You may not have noticed it, but you are being trolled, smacked, and jabbed at on these forums just like we do to each other. Your players are treating you as equals, rather than the respected and objective judge of all things. You jumped into the fray, and when you jump into a fray - your likely to get hit.
|

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
110
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 16:14:00 -
[1067] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: The primary argument of the FTC RMT'ers have given to defend the validity of their practice is that CCP hasn't stopped it. And I have to say, I agree with them - unless CCP was ignorant of it then the fact that nothing has been done thus far to stop it basically amounts to approval.
Considering that there have been 3 separate endorsements of Somer by CCP (community spotlight, 5-of-a-kind Somer-branded SoE ships, and secret scorpions) that CCP might not have bothered to check what Somer actually does would be hilarious to me.
I'm not sure which would be worse, their blatant hypocrisy if they did know, or the gross incompetence of every single person involved if they didn't. |

Frying Doom
2727
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 16:24:00 -
[1068] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Argus Sorn wrote: The primary argument of the FTC RMT'ers have given to defend the validity of their practice is that CCP hasn't stopped it. And I have to say, I agree with them - unless CCP was ignorant of it then the fact that nothing has been done thus far to stop it basically amounts to approval.
Considering that there have been 3 separate endorsements of Somer by CCP (community spotlight, 5-of-a-kind Somer-branded SoE ships, and secret scorpions) that CCP might not have bothered to check what Somer actually does would be hilarious to me. I'm not sure which would be worse, their blatant hypocrisy if they did know, or the gross incompetence of every single person involved if they didn't. Them not knowing would at least be as funny as hell. As opposed to the other. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
473
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:04:00 -
[1069] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote: A) The forum one, for sure. CCP's version, I hope so, but it's up to them.
So you're not going to push for it? And yes, saying "I hope so" means you aren't going to say anything, you are hoping it will be. A better response would have been, "The CSM will do everything in its power to make sure that CCPs survey(s) will be made public and nothing is redacted." At least make us think you have a pair. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
253
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:12:00 -
[1070] - Quote
Hey guyz, look at me, I'm a Somer Blink shill
But.. but.. others cannot do what I do because they will break my RMT monopoly!!! 
The End  |
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
175
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:19:00 -
[1071] - Quote
CCP just locked 2 or 3 of the RMT threads but left DNSBlack's alone. so, it does look like an implicit acknowledgement that what he is doing is above board for now under the current EULA. |

DarkDecay
Real money traders
67
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:31:00 -
[1072] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:CCP just locked 2 or 3 of the RMT threads but left DNSBlack's alone. so, it does look like an implicit acknowledgement that what he is doing is above board for now under the current EULA.
EDIT: DNSBlack's thread is still open, it seems Dolan has said that the ETC must go through an authorized reseller first but he raised no issue other than that.
lol, that means that only DNS (the winner) and me (second aint bad) got to sell stuffz?
edit: and mine did go through an authorised reseller... |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
473
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:39:00 -
[1073] - Quote
Unfortunately, there's a very good chance that the people who bought these characters (assuming this isn't a massive joke based off the EULA) that CCP is going to ban these characters almost immediately. Part of the TOS is that your account/characters can be banned at any time, for any reason or no reason at all.
EDIT:
However, my law professor who specializes in contractual law pointed out something about this: I won't go into specifics, but she mentioned that there is already an issue with legality in the United States concerning this, as well as in South Korea. In essence, the issue stems from transactions between both real-world currency and virtual currency. Second, assuming the people who have the accounts banned can prove that it was due to an inability to understand the EULA--which, I might add, is very plausible given the fact CCP can't simplify it for us in a ******* month--then there's a breach of contract on CCP's part for refusing to adequately and fairly, in an impartial manner, execute compliance with the contract.
Long story short: if CCP does this, someone (or some people!) are going to make far more than $2,500 in a court of law. |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:50:00 -
[1074] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Unfortunately, there's a very good chance that the people who bought these characters (assuming this isn't a massive joke based off the EULA) that CCP is going to ban these characters almost immediately. Part of the TOS is that your account/characters can be banned at any time, for any reason or no reason at all.
EDIT:
However, my law professor who specializes in contractual law pointed out something about this: I won't go into specifics, but she mentioned that there is already an issue with legality in the United States concerning this, as well as in South Korea. In essence, the issue stems from transactions between both real-world currency and virtual currency. Second, assuming the people who have the accounts banned can prove that it was due to an inability to understand the EULA--which, I might add, is very plausible given the fact CCP can't simplify it for us in a ******* month--then there's a breach of contract on CCP's part for refusing to adequately and fairly, in an impartial manner, execute compliance with the contract.
Long story short: if CCP does this, someone (or some people!) are going to make far more than $2,500 in a court of law.
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=t8RCQDDsMpU&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dt8RCQDDsMpU
IS WHAT I HAVE TO SAY TO CCP IF THEY DO THAT |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:52:00 -
[1075] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Unfortunately, there's a very good chance that the people who bought these characters (assuming this isn't a massive joke based off the EULA) that CCP is going to ban these characters almost immediately. Part of the TOS is that your account/characters can be banned at any time, for any reason or no reason at all.
EDIT:
However, my law professor who specializes in contractual law pointed out something about this: I won't go into specifics, but she mentioned that there is already an issue with legality in the United States concerning this, as well as in South Korea. In essence, the issue stems from transactions between both real-world currency and virtual currency. Second, assuming the people who have the accounts banned can prove that it was due to an inability to understand the EULA--which, I might add, is very plausible given the fact CCP can't simplify it for us in a ******* month--then there's a breach of contract on CCP's part for refusing to adequately and fairly, in an impartial manner, execute compliance with the contract.
Long story short: if CCP does this, someone (or some people!) are going to make far more than $2,500 in a court of law.
Believe me I know laws and contracts. My job requires it.
|

DarkDecay
Real money traders
67
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 17:54:00 -
[1076] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
Another ccp post on this topic. |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:01:00 -
[1077] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Mordachai wrote:A) Will the outcome of those surveys be presented to the public ?
B) How will people get to know about those surveys if they arent forum warriors ? (maybe eve-mail the whole community like ccp did with the CSM voting)
C) Will the changes(if any) just come as a tiny fine print in the EULA that nobody reads or will it be announced so people will know about it? A) The forum one, for sure. CCP's version, I hope so, but it's up to them. B) We are working on getting some messaging on the forum version. C) I'm sure it will be announced.
Trebor Daehdoow Im a bit disappointed that you answer posts regarding the survey idea so selectively. I actually wrote a post on page 44 (#874Posted: 2013.10.17 12:42) about it that I really wanted to hear your input to but so far you have simply skipped it or missed it despite it being a serious-meant add to the discussion regarding the use of surveys. 
I would really love to hear your thoughts on it and to know if the survey decision is already set in stone which may be why you didn't bother reading/replying/thinking about what I wrote?  
Regards. Sean
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
410
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:06:00 -
[1078] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
Another ccp post on this topic.
DNSBlack has done community work. Why can't he offer a small bonus? Who decides what bonus is acceptable? Who decides who does adequate community work? Is running an in game corporation well community work? DNSBlack decidely does community work then, as does The Mittani, etc.?
And devs are suddenly offering their "opinions" in the middle of all this? Seriously?
You guys need a primer on crisis management. |

Kuni Oichi
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
140
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:07:00 -
[1079] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
Another ccp post on this topic.
The key line is 'Obfuscating this fact by constructing complex cases that are not in the slightest relevant to any current practice can be considered trolling at best, direct RMT at worst. '
Only CCP's favourite RMT site can RMT, can't have competition with them. |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3145
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:10:00 -
[1080] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:1. A survey result is only as good as its interpretation and many questions can be interpreted differently both by the survey maker (CSM/CCP) and by the players answering the question. We are working hard so that the surveys address this issue. Typically if there is a question "Is X OK?" there will be questions such as "Is X+A OK?", "Is X+B OK?", is "X+A+B OK?" and so on.
Quote:2. If you need a suvey now when does it stop? Does the CSM then need a player-base-wide survey every time they have to deal with the CCP? No, not every time. But this is an important issue, and it's worth taking the time to drill down on the issues. As I said previously, data trumps opinions.
Quote:3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey. I hope that when you do the survey yourself, you will find that it has been designed to shed further light on the topic in an organized way.
Quote:4. A lot of people are not going to answer a survey, it will get lost in the mail. CCP has lots of experience doing email surveys, they know the response rates, they know about multiple accounts, etc. The data from an email survey won't be perfect, but it will be more representative of the general community, as opposed to the active forum community. I'd like data from both groups.
Feel free to continue pushing for a fast resolution. If you get one, it will be one you won't like, because that's the easy option. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |
|

Frying Doom
2735
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:13:00 -
[1081] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
Another ccp post on this topic. DNSBlack has done community work. Why can't he offer a small bonus? Who decides what bonus is acceptable? Who decides who does adequate community work? Is running an in game corporation well community work? DNSBlack decidely does community work then, as does The Mittani, etc.? And devs offering their "opinions" in the middle of all this? Do you guys need a primer on crisis management? I actually took "Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling to be in relation to TMCs employees, a conversation I have actually had nothing to do with.
But I am confused personally as to "Obfuscating this fact by constructing complex cases that are not in the slightest relevant to any current practice can be considered trolling at best, direct RMT at worst." as I am not sure what he meant. Did he mean I had constructed an argument or the whole sale side of it out of thin air.
Just a bit lost as to whether he is actually aware that Somer has a buy a GTC get free isk deal, tbh. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
475
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:13:00 -
[1082] - Quote
Question!
If most people don't bother to read the forums (for whatever reason), then why would they answer a questionnaire or survey done by the CSM/CCP? |

Shai 'Hulud
125
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:16:00 -
[1083] - Quote
It seems CCP only lets certain players/organizations do RMT. Why am I not surprised? All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Shai 'Hulud
125
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:18:00 -
[1084] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Question!
If most people don't bother to read the forums (for whatever reason), then why would they answer a questionnaire or survey done by the CSM/CCP? CCP is hunting for the data they want, they already know how the community feels about favoritism. The CSM was created due to issues of favoritism. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
475
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:23:00 -
[1085] - Quote
It goes hand-in-hand.
A lot of players do not read the forums for whatever reason (forums are dens for trolls, it's useless, etc.), and so outside of the game rarely will a player take advantage of other things. How many surveys are actually answered? I read the forums daily and I'll be the first to admit that I don't fill out a single survey. Partially because I'm lazy, and partially because I do plenty of other things in-game and out of it that it shouldn't matter. What I say on a survey (that, generally speaking, is very narrow in the scope of what data they want collected) is not necessarily what I do in-game.
As I stated before, a survey is narrowly defined. It will not have questions with answers the surveying party doesn't want to see. It is most likely not going to touch on the actual issues that are plaguing this, but side issues. It is going to obfuscate the problems so that CCP can come back and say, "Well, you all said it was okay, so **** off!"
If the CSM wants to go the route of a survey when the proper route is to have an actual position, then that problem is with the CSM, and you should not be there. Period. It seems since Trebor took over, everything is done on a survey so he can figure out the winds of fortune. He stands for nothing but Trebor. And because of that, he will fall for nothing.
Mittens needs to be back on the CSM. FML, I can't believe I just put that in print. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
254
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:25:00 -
[1086] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling.
Please tell us more about your personal opinions. Exactly how many and which other CCP employees share such opinion? |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
413
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:26:00 -
[1087] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340 CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling. Please tell us more about your personal opinions. Exactly how many and which other CCP employees share such opinion?
Somebody did an oopsie!
Seriously, I am not even sure what this means. Maybe I misunderstood.
I am assuming, since we are talking about SOMER, that you are saying that giving an isk bonus with a GTC sale is acceptable to you? But maybe I misunderstood, maybe you mean giving some isk to people who do community work.
Please, we'd love for you to clarify your 'opinion'. |

Shai 'Hulud
129
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:28:00 -
[1088] - Quote
CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling. TL;DR = we like SOMER, the rules are different for you. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
477
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:30:00 -
[1089] - Quote
I think what it comes down to is if the person is directly selling the item or "raffling" it. Even if they already have it set that their buddy will win it--or someone specific will win--as long as it appears to be a raffle it gets around the EULA. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
123
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:31:00 -
[1090] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755340#post3755340
Another ccp post on this topic.
From that post:
Quote:It is strictly forbidden to sell, offer or in any other way advertise the sale of in-game items for real money.
Obfuscating this fact by constructing complex cases that are not in the slightest relevant to any current practice can be considered trolling at best, direct RMT at worst.
It sounds to me like CCP Phantom just stated that SOMER Blink's activities are "direct RMT at worst," as obfuscating the process with multiple steps apparently does not change or excuse the act.
Quote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. Please note that this is my personal opinion and not official ruling.
Unless somehow CCP is arguing that the purchase of GTC's is somehow "community work," which would make absolutely no sense to me. I'm assuming that this phrase was referring to practices similar to EVE news sites' use of ISK to pay players for writing articles, etc. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Shai 'Hulud
129
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:33:00 -
[1091] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:I think what it comes down to is if the person is directly selling the item or "raffling" it. Even if they already have it set that their buddy will win it--or someone specific will win--as long as it appears to be a raffle it gets around the EULA. They are claiming it HAS to be done through the affiliate program ... aka you have to make a website to do RMT.
Convenient they draw the line such that SOMER is fine (at least while they discuss it) All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Sean DT
Revered Mining Corp
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:34:00 -
[1092] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Sean DT wrote:1. A survey result is only as good as its interpretation and many questions can be interpreted differently both by the survey maker (CSM/CCP) and by the players answering the question. We are working hard so that the surveys address this issue. Typically if there is a question "Is X OK?" there will be questions such as "Is X+A OK?", "Is X+B OK?", is "X+A+B OK?" and so on. Quote:2. If you need a suvey now when does it stop? Does the CSM then need a player-base-wide survey every time they have to deal with the CCP? No, not every time. But this is an important issue, and it's worth taking the time to drill down on the issues. As I said previously, data trumps opinions. Quote:3. You have 40+ pages in this thread, granted with quit a bit of repetitive opinions, some hysteria/rage, but ultimately with a clear indication of the problem at hand and suggestions for its solution by many many different voices, not just a few repeaters. I as a normal player have read through the majority of this entire stack of posts and the least I expect from the CSM is that they do that too even if it isn't much fun. Grab a cold beer, bring in a box of cookies, and start reading. Make sure you take a pee break and have a smoke, then come back. Use a pen and a paper to note down the key points of the most interesting posts (there are several in between). Now you don't need the survey. I hope that when you do the survey yourself, you will find that it has been designed to shed further light on the topic in an organized way. Quote:4. A lot of people are not going to answer a survey, it will get lost in the mail. CCP has lots of experience doing email surveys, they know the response rates, they know about multiple accounts, etc. The data from an email survey won't be perfect, but it will be more representative of the general community, as opposed to the active forum community. I'd like data from both groups. Feel free to continue pushing for a fast resolution. If you get one, it will be one you won't like, because that's the easy option.
Alright, I didn't quite hear what I had hoped but nevertheless thanks for taking time to let me know your thoughts on the different points! :)
Also I have not been pushing for a fast/immediate response so not quite sure what the final comment was about. I most definitely prefer well-thought-out reactions! My main point was that I think the CSM council is the way to deal with this, not a survey, and that the collective CSM should be able to come up with an opinion about this issue as they have been elected to do. But if you really love surveys then so be it I guess, I just don't think it's the way to go on this particular matter. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:42:00 -
[1093] - Quote
He means that if you keep pushing for a fast response they'll just tell you to f*ck off and you won't like it because they're gonna let Somer Blink continue to RMT alone anyway. The rest of the playerbase won't like it aswell and massive discontent/ account unsubs will happen. Which seems an adequate measure to be taken when confronted with the confirmation of favoritism. So they rather try to mantain this in the "grey area" to not risk losing subs. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
413
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:44:00 -
[1094] - Quote
Sean DT wrote:Also I have not been pushing for a fast/immediate response so not quite sure what the final comment was about. I most definitely prefer well-thought-out reactions! 
And even if you had been (pushing), which honestly most folks have been rather patient - but even if you have been , then so what?
CCP's job is to get it right despite the pressure. Sorry, but I expect better out of this company. If a company's response to pressure is to respond with a solution that customers don't like because it's easy and spiteful - then they don't deserve to be in business. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
477
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:45:00 -
[1095] - Quote
I was taught grey areas should be stayed away from. You'd be surprised how often courts come down and kick businesses in the balls for practices that are "grey". |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
417
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:50:00 -
[1096] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:I was taught grey areas should be stayed away from. You'd be surprised how often courts come down and kick businesses in the balls for practices that are "grey".
"Gray Area" is a term often thrown about by people lacking ethical clarity and courage. This is why it comes back to haunt folks - because they end up being 'not so gray after all' when looked at logically. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
258
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 18:51:00 -
[1097] - Quote
I was taught only reach fo tha heat if you bustin'.. so when I lift tis shirt that'z the end of discussion...   
Woot Woot |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
259
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 19:41:00 -
[1098] - Quote
The situation as it stands at the moment:
Shai Hulud's and Dark Decay's threads were locked by CCP Phantom using the following message:
CCP Phantom wrote:Quoting the EVE Online Terms of Service: ___ 10. You may not market, sell, advertise, promote, solicit or otherwise arrange for the exchange or transfer of items in the game or other game services unless it is for in-game sales of in-game services or items. ___ Also note the following explanation: ___ 2. Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. ___ This means, if you try to sell in-game items, for example a 30 day PLEX, for real money, you violate the TOS. If you want to become an authorized ETC reseller, please contact the CCP Customer Support via [email protected]. Please note that RMT attempts can swiftly lead to permanent forum and permanent in-game bans.
which claims to deem their raffles illegitimate due to the rafflers not being authorized GTC wholesale sellers (so that means that were they authorized GTC wholesale sellers, the raffle would have been lefitimate and carried on).
DNSBlack's thread however still remains unlocked and got this post by CCP Dolan:
CCP Dolan wrote:Greetings,
Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. We are currently investigating if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted. We appreciate your patience while we investigate this matter.
which doesnt not illegitimize DNSBlack's raffle at the moment, but states that an investigation is being carried to verify "if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted".
Therefore an arbitrary interpretation of the rules and action duality is present, unless DNSBlack is an autorized GTC wholesale seller (in which case CCP Dolan's mentioned investigation will not apply to him). |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2722
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 19:49:00 -
[1099] - Quote
Chiimera wrote:SHENANIGANS! OK. People of CCP, do you accept this decree of shenanigans?
I'll go get my broom.... 
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
180
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 19:57:00 -
[1100] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:The situation as it stands at the moment: Shai Hulud's and Dark Decay's threads were locked by CCP Phantom using the following message:
CCP Phantom wrote:Quoting the EVE Online Terms of Service: ___ 10. You may not market, sell, advertise, promote, solicit or otherwise arrange for the exchange or transfer of items in the game or other game services unless it is for in-game sales of in-game services or items. ___ Also note the following explanation: ___ 2. Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. ___ This means, if you try to sell in-game items, for example a 30 day PLEX, for real money, you violate the TOS. If you want to become an authorized ETC reseller, please contact the CCP Customer Support via [email protected]. Please note that RMT attempts can swiftly lead to permanent forum and permanent in-game bans. which claims to deem their raffles illegitimate due to the rafflers not being authorized GTC wholesale sellers ( so that means that if they were authorized GTC wholesale sellers, the raffle would have been legitimate and could have carried on). DNSBlack's thread however still remains unlocked and got this post by CCP Dolan: CCP Dolan wrote:Greetings,
Any form of ETC trading outside of the CCP created system is not permitted or supported by CCP. We are currently investigating if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted. We appreciate your patience while we investigate this matter. which doesnt not illegitimize DNSBlack's raffle at the moment, ( does not say if he is an authorized wholesale seller or not) but states that an investigation is being carried to verify " if the sort of ETC resale (resale by an unauthorized reseller) is permitted". Therefore an arbitrary interpretation of the rules and action duality is present, unless DNSBlack is an autorized GTC wholesale seller (and Shai Hulud/D(in which case CCP Dolan's mentioned investigation does not apply to him).
apparently he has to be an authorized wholesale reseller 
it's almost like they are making this **** up as they go along |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
259
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:10:00 -
[1101] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:apparently he has to be an authorized wholesale reseller  it's almost like they are making this **** up as they go along
Lol they clearly are. They f*cked up big time and the longer CCP lets this mess unfold the worse it will get. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
483
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:11:00 -
[1102] - Quote
You would think CCP saying, "We sent everyone on vacation before this and it was a mistake" would be a good indication they had learned their lesson, and as such the entire group wouldn't be MIA again for this. It's an exercise in futility! |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
420
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:19:00 -
[1103] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Unfortunately this gets worse before it gets better. And by "gets better" I mean "stops being a complete ****-up", not "we get it and can now play the game feeling tons better". Why is it CCP Dolan and CCP Phantom are coming and telling us about violations of the EULA/TOS, but miraculously can't validate why X is legal, when X+1 is the exact same thing but isn't legal?
Devs gone wild!
Seriously, so how much isk can I tack on as an incentive for buying GTC's?
And if you have to buy them from an authorized reseller, what rules govern their referral programs?
By the way - SOMER is NOT an authorized reseller. He's running a referral program and is therefore exchanging isk for referrals.
How does that apply? |

Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
113
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:21:00 -
[1104] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:You would think CCP saying, "We sent everyone on vacation before this and it was a mistake" would be a good indication they had learned their lesson, and as such the entire group wouldn't be MIA again for this. It's an exercise in futility! But why should they have to say anything? CCP Guard told us to wait a few months and maybe they'll get back to us.
CCP damage control at its finest. |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
181
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:27:00 -
[1105] - Quote
Sal Landry wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:You would think CCP saying, "We sent everyone on vacation before this and it was a mistake" would be a good indication they had learned their lesson, and as such the entire group wouldn't be MIA again for this. It's an exercise in futility! But why should they have to say anything? CCP Guard told us to wait a few months and maybe they'll get back to us. CCP damage control at its finest. winter is coming  |

DarkDecay
Real money traders
72
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:29:00 -
[1106] - Quote
Will need to give CCP the benefit of the doubt on the thread locks as both mine and Shai's were ongoing while DNS's was over and there was no need to lock it.
He did the same as me and Shai and used an official reseller to get the buyer his GTC.
We all used the somer defence of raffle and made up currency.
Where we differed was that he never seemed to ask for a massive $2500 for his GTC's and someone just offered it, while I set an actual price for the GTC of $105 instead of $35 that people could accept for a 'free' plex pack and Shai had $1000 for a gtc for a ship raffle.
This could be the other reason why the threads were locked or not? |

Kate stark
659
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:30:00 -
[1107] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Mordachai wrote:A) Will the outcome of those surveys be presented to the public ?
B) How will people get to know about those surveys if they arent forum warriors ? (maybe eve-mail the whole community like ccp did with the CSM voting)
C) Will the changes(if any) just come as a tiny fine print in the EULA that nobody reads or will it be announced so people will know about it? A) The forum one, for sure. CCP's version, I hope so, but it's up to them. B) We are working on getting some messaging on the forum version. C) I'm sure it will be announced.
with regard to B) i suggest that everyone is sent an eve mail so nobody can claim ignorance.
i know it's possible because i had eve mails about the CSM election. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
424
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:37:00 -
[1108] - Quote
It is entirely obvious to me what the next logical course of action for CCP is...
In B4 DNSBlack gets offered a job.
|

Shai 'Hulud
132
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:38:00 -
[1109] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:It is entirely obvious to me what the next logical course of action for CCP is...
In B4 DNSBlack gets offered a job.
And praised for his great community service... All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
659
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:41:00 -
[1110] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:It is entirely obvious to me what the next logical course of action for CCP is...
In B4 DNSBlack gets offered a job.
And praised for his great community service... "Dear DNSBlack,
We're sorry to inform you that we've run out of IW Scorpions. However, we have a few jobs laying round.
Look forward to seeing you in Iceland.
Regards, CCP." Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
261
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:41:00 -
[1111] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Will need to give CCP the benefit of the doubt on the thread locks as both mine and Shai's were ongoing while DNS's was over and there was no need to lock it.
He did the same as me and Shai and used an official reseller to get the buyer his GTC.
We all used the somer defence of raffle and made up currency.
Where we differed was that he never seemed to ask for a massive $2500 for his GTC's and someone just offered it, while I set an actual price for the GTC of $105 instead of $35 that people could accept for a 'free' plex pack and Shai had $1000 for a gtc for a ship raffle.
This could be the other reason why the threads were locked or not?
You are using the same raffle scheme Somer Blink uses, with the exception that you are offering an over-priced GTC and a raffle, instead of offering a referral to a "normally" priced GTC sold by the authorized reseller and a raffle.
You not being an authorized reseller might be a good reason but I'm not sure if they have rules to regulate the price an authorized reseller can ask for a GTC. If they don't he can sell it for whatever value he wants. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
427
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:47:00 -
[1112] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:DarkDecay wrote:Will need to give CCP the benefit of the doubt on the thread locks as both mine and Shai's were ongoing while DNS's was over and there was no need to lock it.
He did the same as me and Shai and used an official reseller to get the buyer his GTC.
We all used the somer defence of raffle and made up currency.
Where we differed was that he never seemed to ask for a massive $2500 for his GTC's and someone just offered it, while I set an actual price for the GTC of $105 instead of $35 that people could accept for a 'free' plex pack and Shai had $1000 for a gtc for a ship raffle.
This could be the other reason why the threads were locked or not? You are using the same raffle scheme Somer Blink uses, with the exception that you are offering an over-priced GTC and a raffle, instead of offering a referral to a "normally" priced GTC sold by the authorized reseller and a raffle. You not being an authorized reseller might be a good reason but I'm not sure if they have rules to regulate the price an authorized reseller can ask for a GTC. If they don't he can sell it for whatever value he wants.
SOMER is not a reseller. They work with an authorized reseller. I am not saying that there is complete parity between SOMER and our various sellers, but yeah... just something to remember.
All resellers I have seen have the price at $34.99. That could be a requirement. It should be - in order to prevent crazy competition between resellers. It's bad business to allow your agents to undercut eachother, no one will want to be your agent then.
But if that is the case, why allow them to compete/undercut by offering isk bonuss instead? |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
262
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:50:00 -
[1113] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: SOMER is not a reseller. They work with an authorized reseller.
All resellers I have seen have the price at $34.99. But why require all resellers to use the same price if you are going to allow them to compete against one another in the first place (by offering isk)?
Yeah right, they offer the "referral to the authorized reseller" and a raffle. That's what I wrote in last post. Shai and Dark could do the same (offer a referral to an authorized reseller sale).
Yeah I know right, that's what I'm talking about. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
427
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:52:00 -
[1114] - Quote
I know you do m8.
::BROFIST:: |

Rammix
TheMurk
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 20:59:00 -
[1115] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: 1 - Capital blobs are a realistic result of ultra-massive RMT brought to the extreme. Stop pretending it's because of legit effort, this very thread shows the situation, the (too) smart players and a company that closes one eye including vs null sec RMT corps. 2 - What do those types of scum add to the game? It's like going to old Bronx and saying: "all those dog piles help keeping the awesome ambience!" 3 - See point 1. I want to see the same guys happily losing 47B worth of capital ships (just to talk about a recent battle) without blinking, without support from RMT ISK. 4 - It's unlikely SC will have realistic physics. But it'll implement enough to not appear to be a double clicks driven submarine sim. When playing skilled of course, for all the others there's Masterca... ehm Orbit at nn meters. 5 - It certainly does not apply to SC "EvE dissenters". SC is going to be identically "open ended", in fact it's close to EvE's basic principles enough, for a lot of EvE players to watch it closely.
Stop pretending that all capital infrastructure was built only because people donated isk buying plex's. If capital ships are being built it means tonns of resources are being gathered making stable network of resources. And it also means a lot of people are involved in the industry. The industry is just stable and is working as a well-maintained system. With donations of plex or without them - in any case the industry would have reached the needed level of complexity and effectiveness to build capital ships in big amounts. It's absolutely natural. Any efforts to stop or narrow that would be strongly artificial.
I don't know Bronx, I'm not an american. You know, people don't have to be familiar with your local memes. The very PRESENCE of scum makes a game more realistic. Those who can't or don't want to just deal with it - may go to a sweet, little-girl-ish game where people are all nice to each other.
Trade means deals going both ways. Legal donations (sic!) do not suit to the "RMT" term, because they go in but never go out of the game. And Plex btw does not produce ISK, it just stands for an exchange medium on the market. In other words, ISK just change hands without producing anything: some people spend their time to create ingame content and events, other people spend time grinding isk; then they "meet" on the market and there happens exchange of time for money (sort of a salary, in an unusual way). The game benefits from it.
Oh, I've looked at what is SC looking like. There is almost nothing to donate for yet, but I already see an incredible hunger for donations. Eve is not a "submarine sim". I thought it was obvious.
I, for example, looked at it because I wanted a modern space MMO with manual piloting, i.e. space-fight simulator like "Dark Horizon" but in MMO genre. And for me SC is not an option anymore.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Others seem to mind, maybe because sitting with utter a*holes does not immediately feel like it's a big value addition to the game.
"relative anarchy of immortal capsuleers", it's either ok for you, or you chose a wrong game to play. That simple. And noone is forcing anybody to play with "a**holes", a pilot can choose people to have fun with. The universe is big enough.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: What did not exist years ago was PLEX (officially supported RMT). PLEX is a perfect ISK exchange machine (aka wallet segregation breaker or ISK velocity increaser) that lets heavy ISK faucets grinders meet heavy ISK consumers (null sec alliances). Too often the ISK faucet grinders are botters and RMTers. The can buy thousands of PLEXes with dirty ISK and launder it as they place them for sale at convenient prices.
Calling plex-trade an RMT and stopping it is like cutting off one's head because of a headache. Cure headache - in this case it's botting and selling ISK on ebay or wherever - no need to lose the whole head.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: It's a sandbox game, meant to provide us tools to plan and draw our own life plots. If I want to become a trusted service I should be allowed access to *opt in* tools to certify the goodwill. That is self imposed policies and restrictions. A personal choice that lets other people think: "that guy gave up on impunity, he has to behave, we can trust his services".
Now, I personally don't have many issues, if you check the MD forum you will see I got even > 100B ISK just on my word but the game can't be designed around me, Chribba, Grendell and an handful others. Self imposed, opted in trustworthiness should be just another of the plethora of tools this game makes available to us.
Banking system cannot work on trust, without state and government. And for all of it there must be instruments ingame available to capsuleers so that they could create administative autonomy. If you decide one day to use people's trust and start scamming them nothing can stop you and there is no way to punish you. And you're still talking about banking based on trust. Banks and law (law = government, police, courts) are inseparable. People don't go to banks because they trust them, they go there because they trust the government and its ability to maintain law. Also banks don't give money to people out of trust, banks rely on the law (read: government) and that the state can make people return money back (at least in most cases, enough to make bank's business highly profitable). How do you imagine tools which would give players ability to: 1. Write constitution, laws. 2. Make courts, police. 3. Make the punishment for crime at least relatively inevitable. ... OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
TheMurk
91
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 21:00:00 -
[1116] - Quote
... Any set of constitution+laws is based on some ideology. If CCP someday decide to implement all things mentioned higher they either will have to force their ideals upon all the multinational and multicultural playerbase, and thus turn all of New Eden into something like empire space, or give the capsuleers instruments to "construct" from scratch their own governments. The first is awful for eve and the last is incredibly difficult. Hence, banking system won't be introduced to eve in the near future. Also, many people would hate seeing banks in their favourite game.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Also I find it peculiar to call "parasite" somebody who has to manually process ALL the withdrawal tellering process, person by person, transaction by transaction, and also pay interests to the account holders on top of it.
Banks don't do it for free. They get inadequately high profits, all the money tend to flow into banks (because of usury) and that makes banks the main cause of inflation. I mean IRL. Introduce banks to eve, allow them to lend at interest and inflation in eve's economy will like jump up. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
TheMurk
92
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 21:09:00 -
[1117] - Quote
Rammix wrote:People don't go to banks because they trust them, they go there because they trust the government and its ability to maintain law. Also banks don't give money to people out of trust, banks rely on the law Had to quote myself, sorry. For the situation with SOMER this means that ccp is like a government whom the players believe, but if someday SOMER or similar "trust based" organization turns into a huge scam it will be "game mechanics" and I doubt ccp will punish them for that. So ccp shouldn't show their trust to any ingame business organization unless they can guarantee for 100% that this won't ever turn into scam. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

DarkDecay
Real money traders
73
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 21:18:00 -
[1118] - Quote
Just popping in to say that I am still getting emails about people wanting to buy plex and isk for $$$.
If it had been a serious venture by me, and not just a giant **** you to ccp, then I think I could have sold, er 'raffled', maybe $3k worth in the last day. Seems like peeps love a bargain.
If someone did want to legitimately cash out then becoming a GTC reseller and giving a bigger bonus than somer or the other rmt'ers is the way to do it.
|

Shai 'Hulud
136
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 22:18:00 -
[1119] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Just popping in to say that I am still getting emails about people wanting to buy plex and isk for $$$.
If it had been a serious venture by me, and not just a giant **** you to ccp, then I think I could have sold, er 'raffled', maybe $3k worth in the last day. Seems like peeps love a bargain.
If someone did want to legitimately cash out then becoming a GTC reseller and giving a bigger bonus than somer or the other rmt'ers is the way to do it.
My thread was very serious. I'm not sure why I am not being allowed to do what SOMER is doing? All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
2342
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:08:00 -
[1120] - Quote
For CCPs consideration concerning bad press about recent events. You know... morons. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
430
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:19:00 -
[1121] - Quote
Just some numbers on the potential magnitude here. Keep in mind these are ESTIMATES, based on what I've been told about GTC sales and how much isk goes in and out of SOMER per auction. I used a freighter auction as an example - and clearly their promos and the auction of other items that have different exchange rates change the numbers slightly. I understand that. This is not meant to be presented as FACT of how much SOMER has made, but just a thought experiment about what is possible when you deal with the magnitude of isk we are dealing with.
Okay, so a Freighter 'sells' for about 1.6 billion isk (16 x 100 mil tickets) and it cashes out for about 1.3 billion isk in prizes. So one way of looking at this is that SOMER sells 1.3 billion isk for 1.6 billion, managing 300 mil in profit.
So let's go to the auction/raffle:
So 8 GTC's are sold, each for 200 mil isk. Each of these 200 mil isk chunks is used to bid on a freighter. It can be by one, two, three, up to eight different people but the entire freighter is basically bid on with the 200 mil bonus isk. The winner takes the cash out. So of the 1.6 bil put into the tickets, he gets 1.3 bil and SOMER keeps 300 mil.
By the way, notice that at this point the bonus isk is laundered into real isk. Of course people who were smart realized that it was real isk all the time and so I didn't really need to point this out to you - right?
Anyway, back to our example:
As per my prior discussion, SOMER just sold 1.3 billion isk for the cash received for 8 GTC referrals, which I am told is about $1.75 each. This is about 14 dollars for the entire freighter, or 10 dollars per billion isk. Not much at all, not considering PLEX go for about 500 mil (a little low but keeps math easy) for 17 dollars or 34 dollars per bil.
Now, note that SOMER claims on their website to have paid out 1.3 quadrillion isk. The freighter is a 1.3 billion isk payout, so let's just assume SOMER only raffles off freighters. Odd assumption, but since we are dealing in orders of magnitude it can still be used to illustrate how much cash comes into play.
If SOMER stuck with freighters, that means that for the 1.3 quadrillion isk paid out, they have taken in 1.6 quadrillion.
This means SOMER, in the paying out of that 1.3 quadrillion has made approximately 300 trillion isk in profits. Let's assume they only keep 1/3 of it, and pay out the rest to employees and in 'advertising' by sponsoring stuff, and other overhead.
That's 100 trillion isk in profit. At 10 dollars per billion, that is worth $1,000,000.
Now let's assume that SOMER cashes out on 25% of that, and uses the rest to keep their lottery solvent.
That's $250,000 in isk, or for SOMER 25 trillion isk.
OKAY CCP PAY ATTENTION HERE:
If SOMER sells 25 trillion isk, then that's 25 trillion isk in PLEX that you DO NOT sell. I am assuming that the 200 mil credit doesn't create GTC sales mind you - and that it only encourages people to buy from SOMER. Some have taken issue with this, but I think based on human behavior, I have at least some validity to my argument. And you've explained in your own blogs if I recall, how RMT'ing takes money from the game developer. This is especially true when the only real way to buy isk legally is through CCP.
Anyway, 25 trillion isk.
500 million isk per plex.
50,000 PLEX.
That's $850,000 NOT paid to CCP to buy isk. SOMER makes $250,000. CCP loses $850,000. And that's only if they cash out on 1/4th of 1/3rd of what I estimate their profit to be.
Once again - I don't attest that any of this is fact. And the profit has to occur over a long time because someone has to actually BUY the GTC... so it could take years to cash out at this magnitude, but as SOMER grows it will certainly be easier and quicker for them to generate cash.
This is just a little thought experiment about the magnitude of money we are dealing with.
And I don't really care if CCP buys it. It is not really my job to convince them. However, it raises enough questions that in my mind, for your devs to sit there and extol the virtues of a business that honestly gives nothing of substance to the community, and has the potential to cash out of EVE for over 3 million dollars and who potentially can deprive you of millions in PLEX sales...
For you to not see the risk in calling such an entity 100% trustworthy...
For you to not see the problems with developing a conflict of interest with such an entity...
And for your devs to once again start spewing nonsense about how in their "opinion" this is all okay...
Is honestly about the stupidest single thing I've ever a business and its employees do...
In which case you are fools and deserve whatever comes your way.
o7
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4434
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:21:00 -
[1122] - Quote
Rammix wrote: Stop pretending that all capital infrastructure was built only because people donated isk buying plex's.
Not "donated ISK buying PLEXes" but "RL purchased ISK well before PLEXes even existed, and then switched over PLEXes as medium once they became available".
See, you can't deny what I have first hand experience of. I and my alts have been in multiple 0.0 corps / alliances, some of them were very hard working in their SRP (ships replacement program) and would impose us both regular and long week end "corp ops" aimed at grinding ISK (missioning, mining and so on) for the SRP. SRP limited to subcaps.
Others, instead, had caps SRP and nobody did any effort, there were "sister corps" or "pets" who magically made more ISK than all of us together.
Anyone who has been around in EvE enough has seen this or something similar to this. Furthermore, before Darius Johnson got hired, RMT was blatant, smack in the face and tolerated in a VERY similar way to Somer is today. Also, why did he leave? Among other things, because he found out that all his effort was futile because the connivence with cheaters just got raised the bar some notch up by his work at securing EvE but was anywhere close to go away?
Rammix wrote: If capital ships are being built it means tonns of resources are being gathered making stable network of resources. And it also means a lot of people are involved in the industry. The industry is just stable and is working as a well-maintained system. With donations of plex or without them - in any case the industry would have reached the needed level of complexity and effectiveness to build capital ships in big amounts. It's absolutely natural. Any efforts to stop or narrow that would be strongly artificial.
Too bad all you said is false. Before ultra-massive ISK faucets got implemented (i.e. pre-nerf L4, pre-nerf incursions) industry had many years to settle down and move up to be a "well maintained system". More years than some other MMOs whole life spans. Yet those Titan and SC BPOs and all those station eggs were though nuggets to swallow.
It's been unnatural pre-nerf ISK faucets coupled with ample funds Russian (and many others) credit cards that this "industrial miracle" happened.
Rammix wrote: I don't know Bronx, I'm not an american. You know, people don't have to be familiar with your local memes.
I am not American either, I just happen to not live inside a cavern. Which you seem to do about this but also EvE's RMT foundations.
Rammix wrote: "relative anarchy of immortal capsuleers", it's either ok for you, or you chose a wrong game to play. That simple. And noone is forcing anybody to play with "a**holes", a pilot can choose people to have fun with. The universe is big enough.
Apparently CCP proves you wrong. After enough years of this behavior, they enforced no-harassment policies exactly on the first choice victims of this "immorality". Newbie systems are now enforced off limits for those kind of people to apply their undesiderable practices.
Rammix wrote: Calling plex-trade an RMT and stopping it is like cutting off one's head...
I stop because PLEX ARE PURE RMT. They are the main sanctioned CCP RMT, a RMT done by themselves. But it's still RMT and it's why I refuse to pay my subs with PLEX: it's cheating, just legitimate by the Maker but still RMT. Also it's a smart RMT made by CCP to uproot and defeat the former RMTers who just sold ISK for $$$.
They did not squash "classic" RMT, they made it less and less convenient by providing for the "officially sanctioned way to RMT". And then replaced those ISK sellers with their own version. Yet, at the roots, it's still RMT: people pay $$$ for PLEX and sell it on the EvE markets for ISK. It does not get a lot simpler than this.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4434
|
Posted - 2013.10.18 23:21:00 -
[1123] - Quote
Rammix wrote: Banking system cannot work on trust, without state and government. And for all of it there must be instruments ingame available to capsuleers so that they could create administative autonomy.
Once again I have to correct you.
You keep imagining banks are some sort of minority whims, while they have been very popular. What in the end killed EvE banking is exactly tied to my talks above.
They did not die just because of the egregious scams and fu*k ups. They also died because in the end thanks to the innatural ultra massive ISK faucets their debtors stopped caring to go the extra mile to get 1-2B worth of loans. 1 day of Incursions => done. Same for their tellers (always a very scarce resource in those banks): they stopped caring to teller, they could grind some faucets and get in a day what they'd make in a long, thankless week as teller. Banks could not affort raising their pay because that was incompatible with their revenue.
The same destiny made obsolete other meta-professions. After years as auditor, I stopped doing it. Earning 50M for 10-14 hours of work? And put reputation on the line at every audit? NO WAY. These days I refuse to move a finger for below 500M and people pay it because now the economy has been flooded and corrupted by too long lasting ISK fountains and also by RMT capitalizing on those.
Rammix wrote: People don't go to banks because they trust them, they go there because they trust the government and its ability to maintain law. Also banks don't give money to people out of trust, banks rely on the law
CCP implemented scam limitations - both "mechanical" and policy based - on a number of EvE activities (policies on donations and characters selling come immediately to mind). CCP are already "the government", including ECB (EvE Central Bank). The opt in trustworthiness can be implemented by few lines of EULA (i.e. all those opting in are held completely accountable i.e. about scamming for period A to B (stated in advance, periods visible in the bio) and all their accounts will be perma banned if they scam. Furthermore only accounts owned for more than 3 years may be eligible for this. So they face a real loss in case of opted in policy breach.
This does not require any special "government" or "change in EvE's free morality foundations" and so on.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Rammix
TheMurk
93
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 06:57:00 -
[1124] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Not "donated ISK buying PLEXes" but "RL purchased ISK well before PLEXes even existed, and then switched over PLEXes as medium once they became available".
See, you can't deny what I have first hand experience of. I and my alts have been in multiple 0.0 corps / alliances, some of them were very hard working in their SRP (ships replacement program) and would impose us both regular and long week end "corp ops" aimed at grinding ISK (missioning, mining and so on) for the SRP. SRP limited to subcaps.
Others, instead, had caps SRP and nobody did any effort, there were "sister corps" or "pets" who magically made more ISK than all of us together.
Anyone who has been around in EvE enough has seen this or something similar to this. Furthermore, before Darius Johnson got hired, RMT was blatant, smack in the face and tolerated in a VERY similar way to Somer is today. Also, why did he leave? Among other things, because he found out that all his effort was futile because the connivence with cheaters just got raised the bar some notch up by his work at securing EvE but was anywhere close to go away?
You can't seriously say that plex-s are all bad. You ignored that part where I said that some people grind and other make events and content, and those people exchange time for isk via plex trade. It's a positive thing. Unlike some other games, here no matter how much RL money you "invest" in plex it can blow away in a few moments. It's a (relatively) healthy thing. Plex brings more interesting and positive opportunities for eve in general than it brings the negative. Existence and wide availability of capitals - is a GOOD thing, because it gives access to "high end" content to more people, and involve more people to advanced types of battles. If plex gave a strong push to the industry - it's also a good thing. Otherwise it would be moving on slowly like a turtle.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Too bad all you said is false. Before ultra-massive ISK faucets got implemented (i.e. pre-nerf L4, pre-nerf incursions) industry had many years to settle down and move up to be a "well maintained system". More years than some other MMOs whole life spans. Yet those Titan and SC BPOs and all those station eggs were though nuggets to swallow.
It's been unnatural pre-nerf ISK faucets coupled with ample funds credit cards that this "industrial miracle" happened.
No matter the role of plex, for all that infrastructure to work there HAS to be some people gathering resources, and some people organizing all the infrastructure and keeping it effective. You can't just pay npcs to gather ores and organize the whole industry including logistics. Botting is a known problem and it must be dealt with. It's the root of the problem, not plex.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I am not American either, I just happen to not live inside a cavern. Which you seem to do about this but also EvE's RMT foundations.
Don't bend my words. I meant it was very strange to wait that somebody would understand some totally local meme. I don't do RMT and I don't have to know anything about it unless it comes to surface. I'm here not to "fight" with or against ccp, I'm here to just write my opinion and read some others.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Apparently CCP proves you wrong. After enough years of this behavior, they enforced no-harassment policies exactly on the first choice victims of this "immorality". Newbie systems are now enforced off limits for those kind of people to apply their undesiderable practices. And this, exactly because a large part of players took yoru suggestion by the letter and quit EvE within 2 weeks after trying it. And this hurted CCP's bottom line a lot.
No, it does not. Intentional harrasment of newbies and just being scum with all other experienced players - are totally not the same.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I stop because PLEX ARE PURE RMT. They are the main sanctioned CCP RMT, a RMT done by themselves. But it's still RMT and it's why I refuse to pay my subs with PLEX: it's cheating, just legitimate by the Maker but still RMT. Also it's a smart RMT made by CCP to uproot and defeat the former RMTers who just sold ISK for $$$.
They did not squash "classic" RMT, they made it less and less convenient by providing for the "officially sanctioned way to RMT". And then replaced those ISK sellers with their own version. Yet, at the roots, it's still RMT: people pay $$$ for PLEX and sell it on the EvE markets for ISK. It does not get a lot simpler than this.
If people buy plex for real money and sell it on the market ingame, it means other people buy it. If plex weren't used to pay for subscriptions its price would be falling down endlessly. But people use plex. It means some people grind isk to buy plex. And other people instead of spending their time for grinding spend it to create events and maintain activity. As I've already said, plex is just an instrument for people to exchange time for money and vice versa. Without plex EVERYBODY would have to grind and there would be much much less fun and activity.
I see you like demagogy very much. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Rammix
TheMurk
93
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 06:57:00 -
[1125] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: Banking system cannot work on trust, without state and government. And for all of it there must be instruments ingame available to capsuleers so that they could create administative autonomy.
I have to correct you, again. You keep imagining banks are some sort of minority whims, while they have been very popular. What in the end killed EvE banking is exactly tied to my talks above. They did not die just because of the egregious scams and fu*k ups. They also died because in the end thanks to the innatural ultra massive ISK faucets their debtors stopped caring to go the extra mile to get 1-2B worth of loans. 1 day of Incursions => done. Same for their tellers (always a very scarce resource in those banks): they stopped caring to teller, they could grind some faucets and get in a day what they'd make in a long, thankless week as teller. Banks could not afford raising their pay because that was incompatible with their revenue. The same destiny made obsolete other meta-professions. After years as auditor, I stopped doing it. Earning 50M for 10-14 hours of work? And put reputation on the line at every audit? NO WAY. These days I refuse to move a finger for below 500M and people pay it because now the economy has been flooded and corrupted by too long lasting ISK fountains and also by RMT capitalizing on those. Then the banks in eve were never really alive. "Real" banks would be able to hire people, to provide all spectre of services and still make enough money to pay good salaries plus high profits for the owners. The reason - no trust. People en masse won't trust banks if nobody can guarantee that they won't be robbed. And banks can't give out credits to people because nothing can get their money back if a client decides to keep the money.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: People don't go to banks because they trust them, they go there because they trust the government and its ability to maintain law. Also banks don't give money to people out of trust, banks rely on the law
CCP implemented scam limitations - both "mechanical" and policy based - on a number of EvE activities (policies on donations and characters selling come immediately to mind). CCP are already "the government", including ECB (EvE Central Bank). The opt in trustworthiness can be implemented by few lines of EULA (i.e. all those opting in are held completely accountable i.e. about scamming for period A to B (stated in advance, periods visible in the bio) and all their accounts will be perma banned if they scam. Furthermore only accounts owned for more than 3 years may be eligible for this. So they face a real loss in case of opted in policy breach. This does not require any special "government" or "change in EvE's free morality foundations" and so on. If ccp will overwatch all the deals and guarantee flawless work of crediting system - it will be nothing like a sandbox. It will be a damn kindergarden for 25+ year old capsuleers. In a "harsh and dark place" like New Eden, pfff. In eve such things must be operated by capsuleers, not the "godly hand" of ccp. Who would want to play Eve in which players can't make their own rules and break rules of other people? Ability to create and break is essential here.
p.s. Also, really working banks would provide so much power to the owners that they could manipulate nullsec politics, and such power always draws attention of people. If "banking game" in eve wasn't interesting above few billions of profit, it wasn't working as it should. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2739
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 07:54:00 -
[1126] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote: What are you talking about LCO? That is a minor forum thread and it contains one of the best marketing charts EvE has! Those who are super serial about their game love that chart. 
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4436
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 09:15:00 -
[1127] - Quote
Rammix wrote: You can't seriously say that plex-s are all bad. You ignored that part where I said that some people grind and other make events and content, and those people exchange time for isk via plex trade. It's a positive thing. Unlike some other games, here no matter how much RL money you "invest" in plex it can blow away in a few moments. It's a (relatively) healthy thing. Plex brings more interesting and positive opportunities for eve in general than it brings the negative. Existence and wide availability of capitals - is a GOOD thing, because it gives access to "high end" content to more people, and involve more people to advanced types of battles. If plex gave a strong push to the industry - it's also a good thing. Otherwise it would be moving on slowly like a turtle.
A credit card bought titan is as bad as a PLEX bought titan.
I can also say that 2010 L4 missioning and then incursions running were really a lot of fun and positive and fostered production and investments. Incursions I can say they fostered human relations etc. etc.
Yet they were nerfed a ton (and too late).
The ability to $$$ purchase the way to null sec competitivity might look fair and positive to you but it's not. Said by someone who could buy his personal fleet of supercaps (i.e. it's not an "have not rant").
Rammix wrote:No matter the role of plex, for all that infrastructure to work there HAS to be some people gathering resources, and some people organizing all the infrastructure and keeping it effective. You can't just pay npcs to gather ores and organize the whole industry including logistics. Botting is a known problem and it must be dealt with. It's the root of the problem, not plex.
No, the root of the problem is being able to purchase competitivity and advantage. Which is REALLY the topic of the threads created in these days, including this one.
People just don't place Somer and other forms of sanctioned RMT on the same level, expecially as sanctioned RMT make them accomplices to a RL money driven environment that helps the smarter ones "pay for free" (despite the others $$$ buying PLEX pay more than subbing).
Rammix wrote:Don't bend my words. I meant it was very strange to wait that somebody would understand some totally local meme.
A city quarter is not a meme. And using Google is not beyond EvE general player's capability.
Rammix wrote: No, it does not. Intentional harrasment of newbies and just being scum with all other experienced players - are totally not the same.
Creating these policies is a testament to recognizing that many potential EvE players are not available to stand those villains. CCP tones them down in hope those new players will learn and enjoy enough of the game to keep playing it *despite* those scums. Which in turn proves that:
- the villains are not positive to the game, not a "great experience" or an asset. Otherwise CCP would not ban them from those areas. They "prepare" new players to stand those villains later, that's hardly a testament to how those villains are positive for the game.
- that my earlier writing about SC players asking for SC to be different vs EvE in this point has a sense.
Rammix wrote:If people buy plex for real money and sell it on the market ingame, it means other people buy it. If plex weren't used to pay for subscriptions its price would be falling down endlessly. But people use plex. It means some people grind isk to buy plex. And other people instead of spending their time for grinding spend it to create events and maintain activity. As I've already said, plex is just an instrument for people to exchange time for money and vice versa. Without plex EVERYBODY would have to grind and there would be much much less fun and activity.
I see you like demagogy very much.
No, you are the one going the easy way and people even liked some of your posts. You are embellishing the popular choice: buy PLEX, talk about how good super-blob-caps are and so on.
I, as usual, am going against the current and think outside of the herd.
A portion of the "some people grind ISK" consist of botters and RMTers. A "just an instrument for people to exchange time for money" IS RMT. Time is the scarcest and most expensive commodity in the world (not gold, not diamonds) and buying massive time shortcuts is a GREAT imbalance in a sandbox compeititve game. Be it sanctioned by CCP or not.
Imagine this: a guy diligently playing will take 3-4 years to get into his first titan and will shake at the very thought of losing it (thus also somewhat dictating a prudent game play).
A RMTer or even just one of many "new riches" will buy both a titan pilot and ship and does not even grow attached to them. Sure losing it stings but hey, they can afford it without "wasting time" (the real reason MMOs companies exist: make people pay for a long time with long term objectives). His gameplay will be more aggressive and showoff. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4436
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 09:21:00 -
[1128] - Quote
Rammix wrote: Then the banks in eve were never really alive. "Real" banks would be able to hire people, to provide all spectre of services and still make enough money to pay good salaries plus high profits for the owners.
EvE banks were alive and popular. This back when putting together the money for a carrier / dread was a sensible effort.
ISK faucets made them redundant and obsolete as the vast majority of the bank business were in the order of hundreds of millions. The whole net assets value of the largest bank was like 1.5T. Consider how thanks to ISK abundancy, 1.5T is what these days a single veteran player owns all by himself.
Proving my point: Which banks survived? BMBE and large investment vehicles like Grendell or me. Because we can efficiently deal with very few (read: easy tellering) but large transactions. "Large" is the keyword of the post 2010, money inflated EvE.
Rammix wrote: If ccp will overwatch all the deals and guarantee flawless work of crediting system - it will be nothing like a sandbox. It will be a damn kindergarden for 25+ year old capsuleers. In a "harsh and dark place" like New Eden, pfff. In eve such things must be operated by capsuleers, not the "godly hand" of ccp. Who would want to play Eve in which players can't make their own rules and break rules of other people? Ability to create and break is essential here.
EvE is a kindergarden for 25+ olds, because:
- those who want to play "simple and basic" (pew pew, mission etc.) get their content. - those who after 10 years want to "go beyond" don't. EvE is clamped down to its basic level, wannabe advanced players can't push the sandbox into new directions, the sandbox walls really appear as the kindergarden doors.
Rammix wrote: Also, really working banks would provide so much power to the owners that they could manipulate nullsec politics, and such power always draws attention of people.
I'd rather prefer working banks with political influence (like in RL, it's nothing incredible there) than RMT alliances having political influence, SOV and affect null sec politics. If anything else, the former are legit sandbox byproducts, the latter I don't want to see them back again.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Konrad Kane
GoonWaffe
80
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 09:48:00 -
[1129] - Quote
I'm really kicking myself for not investing in popcorn last week. |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
1022
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 11:28:00 -
[1130] - Quote
Not good enough, this is even worst then T20, stop messing with the sandbox.
Even if you give away more of this ships, their price will be much lower, just delete the scorpions and don't do this again. The Tears Must Flow |
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4440
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 13:47:00 -
[1131] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:Not good enough, this is even worst then T20, stop messing with the sandbox.
Even if you give away more of this ships, their price will be much lower, just delete the scorpions and don't do this again.
Yes, CCP please prove us that you are still worth of our trust.
Prove to be the greatest MMO company out there: a company that can admit a mistake, take their responsibility and work towards mending it.
If so, you CCP would leave this situation stronger in our eyes than before you put yourself in this mess. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 15:15:00 -
[1132] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yes, CCP please prove us that you are still worth of our trust.
Prove to be the greatest MMO company out there: a company that can admit a mistake, take their responsibility and work towards mending it.
If so, you CCP would leave this situation stronger in our eyes than before you put yourself in this mess.
I think they have pretty much already proven the opposite.
You don't think it's already too late to come out of this looking good?
|

Shai 'Hulud
143
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 16:13:00 -
[1133] - Quote
I think I finally understand what this "gray area" is. It's the area that only SOMER and other affiliates may inhabit. It's the part of the EULA that does not apply to them like it does to us.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287581&find=unread All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
673
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 16:16:00 -
[1134] - Quote
Tina Tin **** wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yes, CCP please prove us that you are still worth of our trust.
Prove to be the greatest MMO company out there: a company that can admit a mistake, take their responsibility and work towards mending it.
If so, you CCP would leave this situation stronger in our eyes than before you put yourself in this mess.
I think they have pretty much already proven the opposite. You don't think it's already too late to come out of this looking good?
no. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Shai 'Hulud
143
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 16:35:00 -
[1135] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Tina Tin **** wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yes, CCP please prove us that you are still worth of our trust.
Prove to be the greatest MMO company out there: a company that can admit a mistake, take their responsibility and work towards mending it.
If so, you CCP would leave this situation stronger in our eyes than before you put yourself in this mess.
I think they have pretty much already proven the opposite. You don't think it's already too late to come out of this looking good? no. I actually agree. There are steps CCP could take now that would indicate they realize the gravity of the situation, and they are serious about fixing it.
But, unfortunately, I have seen absolutely no indication that this is, or will be, the case. Their efforts thus far have been to preserve their ability to repeat the mistakes and to downplay what has already happened. All while displaying continued favoritism by allowing SOMER to do an RMT process that others have been threatened with bans for attempting.
Something like "We realize we broke the sandbox, and we want to do whatever we have to do to fix it."
From the responses we have been getting, I'm not sure many of the CCP employees even know what a sandbox game is... All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 17:30:00 -
[1136] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote: But, unfortunately, I have seen absolutely no indication that this is, or will be, the case. Their efforts thus far have been to preserve their ability to repeat the mistakes and to downplay what has already happened. All while displaying continued favoritism by allowing SOMER to do an RMT process that others have been threatened with bans for attempting.
Exactly - they appear to be trying very hard to hang on to the grey area...
Which is why I think it is already too late... |

Frying Doom
2748
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:25:00 -
[1137] - Quote
Tina Tin **** wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Yes, CCP please prove us that you are still worth of our trust.
Prove to be the greatest MMO company out there: a company that can admit a mistake, take their responsibility and work towards mending it.
If so, you CCP would leave this situation stronger in our eyes than before you put yourself in this mess.
I think they have pretty much already proven the opposite. You don't think it's already too late to come out of this looking good? Personally I think they could unbury them selves by proving that they are still an unbiased provider.
I think the other thing they are forgetting is that this is no a free to play game where this sort of thing might slide better, we pay for this game and I don't think people will continue to want to if they show that it is one rule for most people and a different set of rules for others.
Personally I think too much will be put on this survey as if it comes back with results that say "The community has said Somer can keep getting billions of isk in gifts and continue to RMT" then people will just call bull on the whole thing and CCP can hardly argue as to why the results are correct as they have already shown their favoritism and the fact they will bend the rules for Somer Blink. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

DarkDecay
Real money traders
78
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 21:41:00 -
[1138] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Personally I think too much will be put on this survey as if it comes back with results that say "The community has said Somer can keep getting billions of isk in gifts and continue to RMT" then people will just call bull on the whole thing and CCP can hardly argue as to why the results are correct as they have already shown their favoritism and the fact they will bend the rules for Somer Blink.
I think a truly independent survey company would be needed here as lets face it CCP and trust just seem to go together now.
|

Frying Doom
2749
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:04:00 -
[1139] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Personally I think too much will be put on this survey as if it comes back with results that say "The community has said Somer can keep getting billions of isk in gifts and continue to RMT" then people will just call bull on the whole thing and CCP can hardly argue as to why the results are correct as they have already shown their favoritism and the fact they will bend the rules for Somer Blink. I think a truly independent survey company would be needed here as lets face it CCP and trust just dont seem to go together now. The shame is that after the Incarna disaster they were starting to earn back the trust of the players. Sure their customer service skills make telephone companies look good by comparison but the trust was coming back.
And then they once again threw it all away, and frankly for what? Money, the increased sales of GTCs. So once again we are back to the whole greed is good thing.
What strikes me is odd is that they haven't realized that improving their customer service and showing them selves to be a trust worthy company, keeping the promises they make to its paying customers (or just not making stupid announcements) would actually get them more money in the end than these 'Get rich quick schemes" Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Rammix
TheMurk
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:06:00 -
[1140] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: ...
You completely ignore the essential parts you can't counter. Like positive sides of plex which are not "insignificant".
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: A city quarter is not a meme. And using Google is not beyond EvE general player's capability.
Why should I know anything about a city district (it's in New York, right?)? Or you think all the world should know about it? And why would I google some local thing? If Bronx were a world-wide significant cultural or historical thing probably it would deserve being known and it's memes being known, otherwise it's just a place.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Creating these policies is a testament to recognizing that many potential EvE players are not available to stand those villains. CCP tones them down in hope those new players will learn and enjoy enough of the game to keep playing it *despite* those scums. Which in turn proves that:
- the villains are not positive to the game, not a "great experience" or an asset. Otherwise CCP would not ban them from those areas. They "prepare" new players to stand those villains later, that's hardly a testament to how those villains are positive for the game.
- that my earlier writing about SC players asking for SC to be different vs EvE in this point has a sense.
Eve is created as a "dark and cruel universe". Presence of "bad people" just fits in it.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote:If people buy plex for real money and sell it on the market ingame, it means other people buy it. If plex weren't used to pay for subscriptions its price would be falling down endlessly. But people use plex. It means some people grind isk to buy plex. And other people instead of spending their time for grinding spend it to create events and maintain activity. As I've already said, plex is just an instrument for people to exchange time for money and vice versa. Without plex EVERYBODY would have to grind and there would be much much less fun and activity.
I see you like demagogy very much. No, you are the one going the easy way and people even liked some of your posts. You are embellishing the popular choice: buy PLEX, talk about how good super-blob-caps are and so on. I, as usual, am going against the current and think outside of the herd. A portion of the "some people grind ISK" consist of botters and RMTers. A "just an instrument for people to exchange time for money" IS RMT. Time is the scarcest and most expensive commodity in the world (not gold, not diamonds) and buying massive time shortcuts is a GREAT imbalance in a sandbox compeititve game. Be it sanctioned by CCP or not. Imagine this: a guy diligently playing will take 3-4 years to get into his first titan and will shake at the very thought of losing it (thus also somewhat dictating a prudent game play). A RMTer or even just one of many "new riches" will buy both a titan pilot and ship and does not even grow attached to them. Sure losing it stings but hey, they can afford it without "wasting time" (the real reason MMOs companies exist: make people pay for a long time with long term objectives). His gameplay will be more aggressive and showoff. If you're suggesting to remove or strongly restrict access to the capitals I cannot agree with you. Supercapitals - maybe should become more difficult to build/get, but not capitals. If ccp wins against botting it will solve most of the "too many capitals" problem. And if ccp completely (or almost completely) ends all illegal rmt, it will also help. "Afford a titan without wasting time"? Lol, its cost is rather significant even in RL money. If you lose that titan bought for real money in the next battle, you also lose (in a moment) precious time spent on your job in real world. Illegal RMT and botting are interlaced, as you know: people use bots to grind isk to sell this isk for RL money, and people invest RL money to help their bots be more effective. Sort of a black market business. Remove bots and illegal rmt, and plex market won't be such a big "problem". Yes, it has its bad sides, but it also has significant good sides (I've mentioned already, more pvp activity and less grinding). OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |
|

Rammix
TheMurk
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:08:00 -
[1141] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: Then the banks in eve were never really alive. "Real" banks would be able to hire people, to provide all spectre of services and still make enough money to pay good salaries plus high profits for the owners.
EvE banks were alive and popular. This back when putting together the money for a carrier / dread was a sensible effort. ISK faucets made them redundant and obsolete as the vast majority of the bank business were in the order of hundreds of millions. The whole net assets value of the largest bank was like 1.5T. Consider how thanks to ISK abundancy, 1.5T is what these days a single veteran player owns all by himself. Proving my point: Which banks survived? BMBE and large investment vehicles like Grendell or me. Because we can efficiently deal with very few (read: easy tellering) but large transactions. "Large" is the keyword of the post 2010, money inflated EvE. The main purpose of banking system for its owners is ability to gain political and social power with crediting system. In eve if you try to force your will through crediting system.. you just won't be able to get your money back, it means you don't have real power over money flows. That is why I say banks in eve are just poor imitation and not "alive".
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: EvE is a kindergarden for 25+ olds, because:
- those who want to play "simple and basic" (pew pew, mission etc.) get their content. - those who after 10 years want to "go beyond" don't. EvE is clamped down to its basic level, wannabe advanced players can't push the sandbox into new directions, the sandbox walls really appear as the kindergarden doors.
And again you try to bend the meaning. Kindergarden is a place for little children, and 25+ y.o. "capsuleers" in a "dark universe" are obviously not little children. The essence of a sandbox-style game is ability to build and to break. Some people build things, other people break those things, and for the first group of people the "breakers" are scum and evil. If somebody wants to just sit like a kid and draw his doodles, without anybody to throw sand in his eyes.. okay. He chose the wrong game. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those "breakers" but I would find EVE boring without them.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Rammix wrote: Also, really working banks would provide so much power to the owners that they could manipulate nullsec politics, and such power always draws attention of people.
I'd rather prefer working banks with political influence (like in RL, it's nothing incredible there) than RMT alliances having political influence, SOV and affect null sec politics. If anything else, the former are legit sandbox byproducts, the latter I don't want to see them back again. Oh no, RL-ish banks in eve would be much worse. Against RMTing alliances you can fight, you can disrupt their botting, you can "win with skill" or at the very least be a serious threat. But against an organization which can - without limits - make corporations bankroupts, bribe people, hire any mercenaries, freely manipulate prices on the market -- you cannot win, you just obey or forget about any political strength. Of course banks can't gain such power in a moment, but in eve after 1-2 years they will control the market (given they have RL-ish mechanics ingame). And I don't want to see in Eve's economy a situation similar to that in real life.
p.s. Seems this discussion's got pointless. Switching to read-only mode. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Gul Amarr
Orange County Cruisers
34
|
Posted - 2013.10.19 23:55:00 -
[1142] - Quote
Rammix wrote:
p.s. Seems this discussion's got pointless. Switching to read-only mode.
I'm mostly in read-only mode, but the only way to make me willing to even discuss the issue would be to ban Somer and all associated parties as well as firing Navigator.
Anything else is inacceptable. |

Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 03:14:00 -
[1143] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: A city quarter is not a meme. And using Google is not beyond EvE general player's capability.
Why should I know anything about a city district (it's in New York, right?)? Or you think all the world should know about it?
"Rumble in the Bronx" |

Frying Doom
2750
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 04:34:00 -
[1144] - Quote
I think with the Gold Magnates, Scorpions worth hundreds of Billions and the fact CCP is turning a blind eye to RMT because it makes them money.
It is best to paraphrase the Great Douglas Adams....
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy wrote:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy defines the marketing division of Crowd Control Productions as "a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes," with a footnote to the effect that the editors would welcome applications from anyone interested in taking over the post of robotics correspondent.
Curiously enough, an edition of the Encyclopaedia Galactica that had the good fortune to fall through a time warp from a thousand years in the future defined the marketing division of Crowd Control Productions as "a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came."
He also goes on to say
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy wrote:GÇ£Share and Enjoy' is the company motto of the hugely successful Crowd Control Productions Complaints Division, which now covers the major land masses of three medium-sized planets and is the only part of the Corporation to have shown a consistent profit in recent years. The motto stands-- or rather stood-- in three mile high illuminated letters near the Complaints Department spaceport on Eadrax. Unfortunately its weight was such that shortly after it was erected, the ground beneath the letters caved in and they dropped for nearly half their length through the offices of many talented young Complaints executives-- now deceased. The protruding upper halves of the letters now appear, in the local language, to read "Go stick your head in a pig," and are no longer illuminated, except at times of special celebration. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4442
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 07:32:00 -
[1145] - Quote
Rammix wrote: You completely ignore the essential parts you can't counter. Like positive sides of plex which are not "insignificant".
I don't ignore them. They are not "evil" per se but have been mismanaged through a series of manouvres to greatly spread their usage while still saving their intrinsic value. In an healthy environment PLEXes provide for:
1) a first line of defense against RMT 2) a way to reward with "free" game time those who are good at amassing ISK 3) advanced end game for traders.
but they have bad sides and corresponding counter points:
1) the first line of defense against RMT is done by competing with RMTers with CCP created RMT. This is ethically muddy at best.. These days threads show how bad it gets when CCP enters the RMT domain and consort with it.
2) not only they reward who's good at amassing ISK, but they GREATLY reward botters, multiboxers, RMTers (both as laundering and wealth transfer medium) and also - and here's what I HATE - those who want to tilt the sandbox in their favor by using vast RL wallets to buy their way to EvE success.
This is the definition of "golden ammo" if there's one.
And all seem BLIND and don't (want to) see it.
In a ultra-competitive sandbox game featuring some of the brightest minds in the MMO landscape, undeserving individuals and groups purchase their way to success.
3) PLEXes have multiplied the destabilizing effects of ISK overabundance, the latter having gone out of control for entire years in a game where economy is all.
Rammix wrote: Why should I know anything about a city district (it's in New York, right?)? Or you think all the world should know about it? And why would I google some local thing? If Bronx were a world-wide significant cultural or historical thing probably it would deserve being known and it's memes being known, otherwise it's just a place.
It's a symbolic location where big battles have been fought. I won't claim it's as famous as New York, Rome or Venice but it had a role in our collective history and probably worth a Google. At least to not show ignorant on general culture.
Rammix wrote: Eve is created as a "dark and cruel universe". Presence of "bad people" just fits in it.
No, "bad people" would be evil geniuses a la Bad Bobby or many a brilliant corp thieves, alliance saboteurs, even Goons (even if much of their "evilness" is role played, many are cool guys.
A*holes on the other hand, are just that: no added value a*holes and background fastidious noise.
Rammix wrote: If you're suggesting to remove or strongly restrict access to the capitals I cannot agree with you. Supercapitals - maybe should become more difficult to build/get, but not capitals. If ccp wins against botting it will solve most of the "too many capitals" problem. And if ccp completely (or almost completely) ends all illegal rmt, it will also help. "Afford a titan without wasting time"? Lol, its cost is rather significant even in RL money. If you lose that titan bought for real money in the next battle, you also lose (in a moment) precious time spent on your job in real world. Illegal RMT and botting are interlaced, as you know: people use bots to grind isk to sell this isk for RL money, and people invest RL money to help their bots be more effective. Sort of a black market business. Remove bots and illegal rmt, and plex market won't be such a big "problem". Yes, it has its bad sides, but it also has significant good sides (I've mentioned already, more pvp activity and less grinding).
I don't suggest removing supercaps inflation but just to remove the factors that let it happen. If those factors disappeared, supercaps due to natural "destruction cycle" would return down to an healthy value.
Sadly, botting is not going to go away just because you hope so. 10 years and it's still there.
Also, you don't know how many can't care the less to lose $1000 in a ship explosion. I live in a place full of rich Russians and Germans (but also English people and others) who give $200 to $500 tips to resturant waiters and where shops sell $50k wrist watches and $1000 perfumes.
I don't want to outsmart them and be insanely rich in EvE... and then just see one of them come in and create tens of billions with a credi card.
It's the SAME IDENTICAL TOPIC of this thread: people who play the sandbox that see others getting favoritism. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Stoogie
Space Pygmies
132
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:04:00 -
[1146] - Quote
I have a question about this survey, I've cancelled my accounts over this (various other things have contributed but this pushed me over the edge) I would like to come back to the game at some point but I won't get a say in the survey because I'm not an active customer because I'm doing what I think is right.
Do I and the others who have cancelled accounts get a say or are we just going to be ignored due to the fact our voices on the forums have been ignored so far? |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
684
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:37:00 -
[1147] - Quote
Stoogie wrote:I have a question about this survey, I've cancelled my accounts over this (various other things have contributed but this pushed me over the edge) I would like to come back to the game at some point but I won't get a say in the survey because I'm not an active customer because I'm doing what I think is right.
Do I and the others who have cancelled accounts get a say or are we just going to be ignored due to the fact our voices on the forums have been ignored so far?
/me blinks, at first blush this seems likje a reasonable idea but then I thought about it.
People who have left Eve having a say in how the game should be or become. Think about all the folks who came looking far a themepark, their hands held, all wanting to make Eve into something it is not.
No, if you want a say then somebody has ta pay. Hopefully on your exit poll you made clear why you were leaving . . . THAT was your chance.
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Kate stark
691
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 20:56:00 -
[1148] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Stoogie wrote:I have a question about this survey, I've cancelled my accounts over this (various other things have contributed but this pushed me over the edge) I would like to come back to the game at some point but I won't get a say in the survey because I'm not an active customer because I'm doing what I think is right.
Do I and the others who have cancelled accounts get a say or are we just going to be ignored due to the fact our voices on the forums have been ignored so far? /me blinks, at first blush this seems likje a reasonable idea but then I thought about it. People who have left Eve having a say in how the game should be or become. Think about all the folks who came looking far a themepark, their hands held, all wanting to make Eve into something it is not. No, if you want a say then somebody has ta pay. Hopefully on your exit poll you made clear why you were leaving . . . THAT was your chance. m
but then we just get skewed results saying "oh, players are cool with it" because most of the people who were disgusted by the change have quit.
then again i'm not really sure what you're expecting to get from the survey that you can't get by simply reading this thread, and the other threads that were initially created before this one. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Stoogie
Space Pygmies
132
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:05:00 -
[1149] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Stoogie wrote:I have a question about this survey, I've cancelled my accounts over this (various other things have contributed but this pushed me over the edge) I would like to come back to the game at some point but I won't get a say in the survey because I'm not an active customer because I'm doing what I think is right.
Do I and the others who have cancelled accounts get a say or are we just going to be ignored due to the fact our voices on the forums have been ignored so far? /me blinks, at first blush this seems likje a reasonable idea but then I thought about it. People who have left Eve having a say in how the game should be or become. Think about all the folks who came looking far a themepark, their hands held, all wanting to make Eve into something it is not. No, if you want a say then somebody has ta pay. Hopefully on your exit poll you made clear why you were leaving . . . THAT was your chance. m
I did do that on my Exit poll on one of my accounts and although I shut down 5 that's still ok cos that's my voice. While I see where your coming from this is a different situation to the one you mention due to me being a long term player who enjoyed what eve was. I tend to agree with kate more but you have the right to think like that. |

Rammix
TheMurk
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:19:00 -
[1150] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: A*holes on the other hand, are just that: no added value a*holes and background fastidious noise.
I think there is no way to do something to the "useless" a**holes without affecting the "useful" ones.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I don't want to outsmart them and be insanely rich in EvE... and then just see one of them come in and create tens of billions with a credi card.
Emmm, they don't "create" isk, you know. *removed a wall of text*  tl;dr: Obviously plex is not an evil in itself; its misuse is the evil and if there's a way to make plex market healthy without cutting off its positive sides - nice, ccp should get to know about it. Though I don't think there can be a trivial solution. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |
|

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
685
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:31:00 -
[1151] - Quote
Kate, I agree that the results will be slightly skewed no matter how you slice it. That is why we are poolling in multiple methods, here in the forums and via the larger shotgun spread of the CCP mail version.
Here in the forums is an sub community. The people who metagame who do more than just PLAY the game. (Or play a larger part of it) WE care, enough to spend time writing and discussing the issues of the game.
But do you think we represent the majority of the players?
Do they deserve a voice and a say if they cannot be bothered to come onto the forums and educate themselves? If they do deserve that voice how do we give it to them?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Rammix
TheMurk
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:31:00 -
[1152] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: but then we just get skewed results saying "oh, players are cool with it" because most of the people who were disgusted by the issue have quit.
Why are their opinions so important if they couldn't even find fun (or keep finding fun) in eve and keeped focused on a problem? We should just say "can-i-have-your-stuff" and wave goodbye to them. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Kate stark
691
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:50:00 -
[1153] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate, I agree that the results will be slightly skewed no matter how you slice it. That is why we are poolling in multiple methods, here in the forums and via the larger shotgun spread of the CCP mail version.
Here in the forums is an sub community. The people who metagame who do more than just PLAY the game. (Or play a larger part of it) WE care, enough to spend time writing and discussing the issues of the game.
But do you think we represent the majority of the players?
Do they deserve a voice and a say if they cannot be bothered to come onto the forums and educate themselves? If they do deserve that voice how do we give it to them?
m
as a sample; yes i think the people on the forum provide a fair representation of the playerbase. we have miners on the forums, we have mission runners, we have people who love null sec and all it's shenannigans. the forums are probably one of the few places you will find a group of players so diverse. granted, that doesn't mean the forums are the only place you should pull opinions from though.
that's a bit of an unfair question; if they don't come and educate themselves why should they be allowed to have a say? half of the reason the original topic got locked is because i decided to (rather foolishly) point out some one had genuinely missed the point at which they decided to derail the thread instead of educating themselves (and i subsequently couldn't let it go and kept pressing as to why he thought his real life was of any importance to the discussion what so ever thus eventually forcing the thread to be locked, which hilariously demonstrated that CCP ALSO missed the point by directing us to two unrelated threads). regardless of where they go, if they don't understand the issue then no they shouldn't have a voice. then again how you demonstrate understanding of an issue that has become this messy and polluted in order to answer a few questions that might make ccp do or not do something is an exercise in futility.
all in all i'm still slightly perplexed as to how CCP thought this issue wasn't going to eventually blow up in their face to begin with...
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote: but then we just get skewed results saying "oh, players are cool with it" because most of the people who were disgusted by the issue have quit.
Why are their opinions so important if they couldn't even find fun (or keep finding fun) in eve and keeped focused on a problem? We should just say "can-i-have-your-stuff" and wave goodbye to them.
people who have canceled their accounts have done so because they feel strongly about the issue. why should their account be valued any less?
perhaps the compromise is to survey all current players, and all players who's accounts have gone inactive less than x time ago. and by the time the survey goes out it'll probably be at least 2 months since the whole situation became common knowledge. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1461
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:53:00 -
[1154] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Kate, I agree that the results will be slightly skewed no matter how you slice it. That is why we are poolling in multiple methods, here in the forums and via the larger shotgun spread of the CCP mail version.
Here in the forums is an sub community. The people who metagame who do more than just PLAY the game. (Or play a larger part of it) WE care, enough to spend time writing and discussing the issues of the game.
But do you think we represent the majority of the players?
Do they deserve a voice and a say if they cannot be bothered to come onto the forums and educate themselves? If they do deserve that voice how do we give it to them?
m
Those who voted for the CSM are a sub community.
Do you think those who voted in the CSM election represented the majority of players?
Should multiple forms/methods have been used to select the CSM?
Do you think those who could not be bothered and educate themselves about the CSM enough to vote deserve a voice and how should we give it to them?
Funny how a tiny number of votes (of the entire player base) can get folk elected to the CSM, but more representative methods are needed to decide if CCP favouring some player corps is acceptable.
CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine. This is not a signature. |

Kate stark
692
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 21:57:00 -
[1155] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine.
CCP giving any in-game entity anything in-game is wrong.
CCP have demonstrated time and time again they have plenty of awesome out of game things they can give to people as "rewards" and "thank yous" and such like. **** me, look at the models they gave away at eve vegas. they are pretty awesome, give those to people who do cool stuff. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1461
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 22:00:00 -
[1156] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine. CCP giving any in-game entity anything in-game is wrong. CCP have demonstrated time and time again they have plenty of awesome out of game things they can give to people as "rewards" and "thank yous" and such like. **** me, look at the models they gave away at eve vegas. they are pretty awesome, give those to people who do cool stuff.
^^^
You got my vote deary This is not a signature. |

Mike Azariah
DemSal Corporation DemSal Unlimited
685
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 22:09:00 -
[1157] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Those who voted for the CSM are a sub community.
Do you think those who voted in the CSM election represented the majority of players?
Should multiple forms/methods have been used to select the CSM?
Do you think those who could not be bothered and educate themselves about the CSM enough to vote deserve a voice and how should we give it to them?
Funny how a tiny number of votes (of the entire player base) can get folk elected to the CSM, but more representative methods are needed to decide if CCP favouring some player corps is acceptable.
CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine.
Do I think the CSM represents everybody? hell no, wish it did, though.
They changed the election method with the our most current run, now I think they need to change the outreach and campaign styles. If the mountain won't come to Mohamed . . .
and because I don't think we 14 are the 'true representatives' is why I support trying to talk to the greater public via polls as well as here in forums and in channels when I get the chance.
CCP rewarding effort by communities and individuals is not wrong, but I am sure that is not what you meant. What you are saying is that all rewards need to be out of game as opposed to ingame advantages. But if it is non trade and just 'Barbie stuff will it be appreciated/valued? Best I have heard so far is planetary naming which they talked about doing for a Dust Tourney recently. I mean, How many planets are there?
m Mike Azariah-á CSM8 |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1952
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 22:27:00 -
[1158] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine. CCP giving any in-game entity anything in-game is wrong. CCP have demonstrated time and time again they have plenty of awesome out of game things they can give to people as "rewards" and "thank yous" and such like. **** me, look at the models they gave away at eve vegas. they are pretty awesome, give those to people who do cool stuff.
What do you think about non-tangible in game stuff? Or non-tradable in game stuff?
A named moon, station, planet, star system, agent, meta version of a module (i.e. a new meta 4 version which drops as normal)
Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Rammix
TheMurk
96
|
Posted - 2013.10.20 22:53:00 -
[1159] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: people who have canceled their accounts have done so because they feel strongly about the issue. why should their account be valued any less?
Because they're not capsuleers anymore. Leaving eve they waive the right to affect it. An example to clarify this: If you leave some country and stop being its citizen you won't have vote there. It's just logical and fair. OpenSUSE 12.2, wine 1.5 |

Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 00:52:00 -
[1160] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote: people who have canceled their accounts have done so because they feel strongly about the issue. why should their account be valued any less?
Because they're not capsuleers anymore. Leaving eve they waive the right to affect it. An example to clarify this: If you leave some country and stop being its citizen you won't have vote there. It's just logical and fair.
No one (other than the CCP owners) has a "right" to affect EVE. However, if CCP wants EVE to be successful and grow, they should be listening to both current and potential players. |
|

Shai 'Hulud
154
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 01:18:00 -
[1161] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Do I think the CSM represents everybody? hell no, wish it did, though.
They changed the election method with the our most current run, now I think they need to change the outreach and campaign styles. If the mountain won't come to Mohamed . . .
and because I don't think we 14 are the 'true representatives' is why I support trying to talk to the greater public via polls as well as here in forums and in channels when I get the chance. I fail to see your functional purpose. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

DarkDecay
Real Money Traders
81
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 03:16:00 -
[1162] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Because they're not capsuleers anymore. Leaving eve they waive the right to affect it. An example to clarify this: If you leave some country and stop being its citizen you won't have vote there. It's just logical and fair.
By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. There can be infinite surveys or dev blogs on this but they wont entice us back to EVE. The exceptionally unhealthy relationship with somer (and the fairness issues surrounding it), dealing with rmt (somer again), giving away mega prizes (and gifts to somer yet again), and even the ToS fiasco (no doubt somer are here somehow too), are just a few of the contentious issues that CCP will need to deal with before we return.
No one in their right mind will trust CCP if the results of their survey validates the CCP position: the loss of integrity over these somer issues and CCP's sandbox breaking defence of them has seen to that.
I dont care about some survey while I have unsubbed as it will have zero impact on my decision to return or not. Ending the relationship with somer and ending their rmt too is what will convince me and will be the only thing. In this I have learned from previous CCP disasters and will quote the best response for players when dealing with CCP, "Watch what they do, not what they say".
EVE is not a country. Nor is it some form of direct democracy. Even if it was, although it is not, we who have unsubbed over this block of issues are voting with a type of vote that impacts CCP at a different level than people who respond to a survey. The question we have answered is not just 'Do you feel strongly enough about this issue to stop playing EVE?', but the real question we have responded to is when CCP ask us 'Can we have your real life ISK?' and we have answered it with 'No because you ****** up too badly this time'. It may be a tacit addition to our answer but CCP know fine well they need to fix things if they want to get our real life ISK again.
Logic and fairness does not apply here. Ironically, if it did there would not have been this entire mess. |

Kate stark
697
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 05:20:00 -
[1163] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Kate stark wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine. CCP giving any in-game entity anything in-game is wrong. CCP have demonstrated time and time again they have plenty of awesome out of game things they can give to people as "rewards" and "thank yous" and such like. **** me, look at the models they gave away at eve vegas. they are pretty awesome, give those to people who do cool stuff. What do you think about non-tangible in game stuff? Or non-tradable in game stuff? A named moon, station, planet, star system, agent, meta version of a module (i.e. a new meta 4 version which drops as normal)
named planets, etc are cool.
non-tradable ingame stuff? no. here, have 30 nyxes but you can't trade them... still ******* with the sandbox. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
697
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 05:21:00 -
[1164] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote: people who have canceled their accounts have done so because they feel strongly about the issue. why should their account be valued any less?
Because they're not capsuleers anymore. Leaving eve they waive the right to affect it. An example to clarify this: If you leave some country and stop being its citizen you won't have vote there. It's just logical and fair.
that would be a valid example if unsubscribing weren't our only form of protest. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Frying Doom
2753
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 06:10:00 -
[1165] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Those who voted for the CSM are a sub community.
Do you think those who voted in the CSM election represented the majority of players?
Should multiple forms/methods have been used to select the CSM?
Do you think those who could not be bothered and educate themselves about the CSM enough to vote deserve a voice and how should we give it to them?
Funny how a tiny number of votes (of the entire player base) can get folk elected to the CSM, but more representative methods are needed to decide if CCP favouring some player corps is acceptable.
CCP giving any player corp an in-game advantage is wrong.
Non tradable Barbie stuff is fine.
Do I think the CSM represents everybody? hell no, wish it did, though. They changed the election method with the our most current run, now I think they need to change the outreach and campaign styles. If the mountain won't come to Mohamed . . . and because I don't think we 14 are the 'true representatives' is why I support trying to talk to the greater public via polls as well as here in forums and in channels when I get the chance. CCP rewarding effort by communities and individuals is not wrong, but I am sure that is not what you meant. What you are saying is that all rewards need to be out of game as opposed to ingame advantages. But if it is non trade and just 'Barbie stuff will it be appreciated/valued? Best I have heard so far is planetary naming which they talked about doing for a Dust Tourney recently. I mean, How many planets are there? m Mike easy question for you. Does the survey contain a question as follows
"Should any community or for profit site be allowed to deal in RMT (The sale of isk for cash)?"
As that is exactly what Somer is doing. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 07:45:00 -
[1166] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
that would be a valid example if unsubscribing weren't our only form of protest.
QFTT
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2505
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 08:52:00 -
[1167] - Quote
Rammix wrote:Kate stark wrote: people who have canceled their accounts have done so because they feel strongly about the issue. why should their account be valued any less?
Because they're not capsuleers anymore. Leaving eve they waive the right to affect it. An example to clarify this: If you leave some country and stop being its citizen you won't have vote there. It's just logical and fair.
Leaving EVE is the only meaningful way we can demonstrate how big of an issue this is to us. The only other way we demonstrate how we feel about an issue is through posts on the forum or blogs, which is incredibly small and meaningless to CCP (as demonstrated by the fact they keep doing these things, and by the fact that they even completely ignore or exclude the CSM when it suits them to do so).
How many CCP employees do you think are reading my post right now, buried under a thousand other posts? Of those employees that see it, how many agree or care what I think? Of those that care, how many are in a position or have the power to raise this issue and potentially effect a change as a result?
Now compare that to how noticeable it is when a customer who has been paying you a considerable sum every month for seven years STOPS paying you, and explains in the "why" box that this is the reason.
Unsubscribing is the only meaningful way I have to make my voice heard. Unsubscribing is also the only sensible reaction to the game turning into something I no longer enjoy, which is what things like this result in: reduced enjoyment in the sandbox.
|

adarma
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
29
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 09:05:00 -
[1168] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
CCP Falcon, I cannot believe you are still assessing the situation after weeks. Maybe learn from CCP Phantom who assessed the situation and concluded in mere "TWO DAYS" when others tried to go Somer's way?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287581&find=unread |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1467
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 09:12:00 -
[1169] - Quote
By 'Barbie stuff' I mean non in-game usable, for example named planets, a gold star by their portrait, hi-sec stations named after them etc. This is not a signature. |

Frying Doom
2753
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 09:41:00 -
[1170] - Quote
That sounds so wrong, but is unfortunately so right.
CCP Phanton stopped others from RMTing like Somer does. 
What ever became of EvE? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2506
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 11:56:00 -
[1171] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:That sounds so wrong, but is unfortunately so right. CCP Phanton stopped others from RMTing like Somer does.  What has became of EvE?
Yes, why are somer allowed to do the exact same thing - and get official endorsements from navigator - yet others aren't? |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3146
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 12:20:00 -
[1172] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks.
In EVE, it's the other way around. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Maximilian Akora
It's just business.
63
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:13:00 -
[1173] - Quote
Treb, any light on CCP's progress in their "assessment" ? |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
4446
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:16:00 -
[1174] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
Which of the two roles are you doing now? Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Mars OG
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:19:00 -
[1175] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around. Which of the two roles are you doing now? the money ccp wastes on the csm is what guides his talk.
he's certainly walking a line of bullshit. |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
22
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 13:39:00 -
[1176] - Quote
This account ends in December, the other is already up
In order for me to consider the situation resolved...
We need another apology from Hellmar and 6 months of subscription to prove he is sincere. |

Rendiff
Funk Soul Brothers High Rollers
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:28:00 -
[1177] - Quote
I don't see what the big deal here is. If you did something awesome you should get something awesome. |

Kate stark
711
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 16:58:00 -
[1178] - Quote
Rendiff wrote:I don't see what the big deal here is. If you did something awesome you should get something awesome.
but not at the expense of the integrity of the sandbox or other players.
nobody is saying people shouldn't be rewarded for doing cool stuff.
we're just saying the way they were rewarded was bad and the "system" (of which there is none, which is half of the problem) needs to be re-evaluated. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
491
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 18:55:00 -
[1179] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
I agree: In EVE, "bullshit talks". That's why all you've ever done is talk, or surveys. |

Nanatoa
352
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:16:00 -
[1180] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence.
I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement.
"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|
|

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:30:00 -
[1181] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:
I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :(
Something has changed.
I closed two accounts... |

DarkDecay
Real Money Traders
87
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 19:52:00 -
[1182] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence. I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement.
Next steps?
http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/ http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/ (ccp servers are on Uk territory, involved in facilitation of gambling, and this is the appropriate regulatory body) |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
124
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 20:32:00 -
[1183] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Nanatoa wrote:Nanatoa wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Have you petitioned it in game? It was CCP who announced the gold magnates, and it was CCP Navigator who made statements attesting to their honesty and honouring all transactions, and I'm sure that without those statements about what the prize was and how trustworthy the people handling it were you wouldn't have wished to partake and donate that much money to somer That last part (my bolding) is very true. The only reason I put my 16 billion into SOMER Blink was to get a shot at owning a truly historic vessel, something CCP assured I had a honest chance of winning. I really want this settled and my patience and softspokenness should not be confused with a lack of determiniation or persistence. I have an update on this situation: Nothing has changed :( No word from SOMER Blink. No word from Somerset Mahm. No word from CCP. It's like it's the most trustworthy and reliable thing in the world to announce you're doing something, take money for it, and then not do it. Now I don't mind scams in EVE, but I do mind CCP actively participating in them. I would never have given SOMER Blink money if not for CCPs announcement and endorsement. Next steps? http://eng.innanrikisraduneyti.is/laws-and-regulations/english/lotteries/http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/ (ccp servers are on Uk territory, involved in facilitation of gambling, and this is the appropriate regulatory body)
I would also assume that the UK has laws against bait and switch tactics, which could probably be extended to this case. If you are really determined to do something about this, that might be an avenue worth exploring. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Frying Doom
2758
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 22:33:00 -
[1184] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around. You left out the exceptions like Incarna.
Where Money did talk. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2743
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 23:24:00 -
[1185] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote: I would also assume that the UK has laws against bait and switch tactics, which could probably be extended to this case. If you are really determined to do something about this, that might be an avenue worth exploring.
This has already been tested in US courts (second life+)... I don't know if it's the same in the UK. There's no bait and switch here, and in-game items don't really exist. There are no legal options or risks for CCP. It's just policy. They make the internet spaceship "law" and we follow it or get banned. Just relax and let's wait to hear back from CCP on it. Then you can riot... but a lawsuit would be silly & be dismissed right off the bat, and you'll just end up paying court costs and legal fees.
|

Nanatoa
356
|
Posted - 2013.10.21 23:46:00 -
[1186] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Just relax and let's wait to hear back from CCP on it.
Words of Wisdom. I appreciate the suggestions above, but I honestly don't think that any laws have been broken (or if there have been, that any rl organisation would care enough to enforce them on a lottery with pretend-money for pretend-prizes). I just think that SOMER Blink and CCP should do the honourable thing and refund my ISK. I participated for the Gold Magnate, said as much before the prizes were changed, protested immediately after the change, in two places, and messaged Somerset Mahm ingame well before the draw took place. She claimed "we had no control / direction over the prizes", which is weird for a lottery run by them, but anyway, in that case CCP should facilitate a refund. Petitions take an awful long time to get answered though.. Meanwhile, as I said, not a single word from SOMER Blink, Somerset Mahm or CCP. "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Frying Doom
2764
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 00:14:00 -
[1187] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:A quick status report from the CSM side.
We had a 30 minute meeting with CCP Dolan on Monday about a CSM initiative to survey the community. The result of that meeting was constructive, and resulted in a 90 minute meeting Tuesday with CCP Dolan, CCP Navigator and CCP Guard.
During the second meeting, it was agreed that the first step in the process of resolving these issues is to get a better read on community opinions about acceptable practices.
To do this, CSM will be running two forum surveys, in a manner similar to our crowdsourcing initiatives. These will focus on Appropriate Fansite Incentives and Acceptable Fansite Business Models, and will be structured in a way that we hope will encourage good debate.
At the same time, CCP will be running identical surveys through their established subscriber survey methods, so that we have data on the opinions of the general community in addition to the forum community.
We are currently working with CCP to finalize the list of survey questions. We hope this will be completed in a few days, and the forum surveys will go live as soon as possible thereafter. However, things may slip a bit because of EVE Vegas.
CSM welcomes your input as we finalize the survey questions. Our current plan is that each question will be a statement, with 4 possible responses: "This is OK", "This is a grey-area", "This should not be allowed", and "I have no opinion".
Here are some sample statements to give you an idea of the style:
Fansite incentives:
* CCP can provide PLEX as prizes for contests on fansites.
* Fansites should receive incentives in proportion to their benefits to the community.
Business Models:
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me ISK.
* I provide a service to the EVE community, and if they want to thank me, they can give me real money.
We are particularly interested in questions that explore the grey areas.
Posted on the 16th of October...6 days ago.. Any idea of how long before you release the survey for the CSM side, or does it need to be checked by CCP first?
But in all honesty we should probably relax a little and give them some time..Not that I am saying we should completely quieten down, so they come to believe that these problems all revolving around Somer blink have gone away. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
496
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 00:58:00 -
[1188] - Quote
According to Trebor Daehdoow, the chair of this CSM, in EvE Online "bullshit talks".
I agree with you, Trebor. This is probably one of the few things I agree with you on. After all, had you been any type of competent alongside the members of your little group you [imight[/i] be doing things other than talking and telling us how CCP, the progenitors of being slimy and double-talking MMO developers, will be doing their own survey and we should be able to trust them completely.
T20 showed us exactly how CCP operates wen they think they can't be caught.
Monoclegate showed us that CCP will ignore the playerbase and CSM if it makes them money in the short-term, and then after that money is made and subscriptions are leaving by the thousands they will say, "Oh, we were wrong! Please come back!"
CCP defending Mittens during the "go **** with this guy" debacle until the negative publicity mounted with larger websites showed the favoritism.
CCP's defending of SOMER while kicking people who are doing the same thing to the curb shows favoritism once again.
CCP's inabiltiy to adequately explain to us in a month how violations of the EULA are happening, and their inability to explain to us--let alone succinctly clarify specific portions--really leads me to believe they have no clue what they are doing at this point.
Tell you what: EvE Search maintains the original postings of all forum posts, including blues. We'll keep that going. I'm also going to be screenshotting the EULA as of right now and keeping that with me. Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong.
Favoritism is a *****. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1955
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 01:31:00 -
[1189] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong.
At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you.
The difference with the DNSBlack thing is:
CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer.
Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have.
Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
497
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 01:55:00 -
[1190] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA.
However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud. |
|

Maliandra
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:29:00 -
[1191] - Quote
It only partially has to do with rarity, CCP.
Our main issue is that you're handing out free ISK to people. Every person who plays this game has to earn their ISK. If they get rewards they almost always earned it too (winning a tournament for instance).
What you are doing by handing out ISK-valued items to third-parties is giving them ISK simply for existing and being a contributor. You know how many people simply exist that help add to the EVE community? HUNDREDS!!!
You recognize that and then talk about "where we draw the line". You draw the line right at the start. You draw the line by not giving away any free ISK, ever, unless it's earned through in-game actions. If you want to have some sort of lottery where you give away things, make it done offically through CCP.
Third party entities use their profits in-game and as such, giving them anything for free created imbalance and unfair gameplay. |

Maliandra
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
70
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 02:32:00 -
[1192] - Quote
Also CCP you should understand why people still support your game financially:
We have two choices: 1) Spend our money on a game made by suits who want to milk every cent off us at all costs 2) Spend our money on a game made by nerds who play favorites but still give a crap about the game none the less.
You still shouldn't be proud to be #2 :P. It's not #1 I guess, but whatever.. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
272
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 03:20:00 -
[1193] - Quote
As someone in DNSBlack's thread of awezome wrote,
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=287241
The Greenmachine Greenmachine wrote:RIOT COUNT ME IN
REFUSE/RESIST - F*ck Sh*t Up
Chaos A.D. Tanks on the streets Confronting police Bleeding the plebs Raging crowd Burning cars Bloodshed stars Who'll be alive?!
Chaos A.D. Army in siege Total alarm I'm sick of this Inside the state War is created No man's land What's this sh*t?!
Refuse/Resist Refuse
Chaos A.D. Disorder unleashed Starting to burn Starting to lynch Silence means death Stand on your feet Inner fear Your worst enemy
Refuse/Resist Refuse/Resist |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1955
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:16:00 -
[1194] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud.
And what, exactly, do you think the courts will do about it? Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
500
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 05:21:00 -
[1195] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Then, when you start banning people for doing what SOMER is doing, they can take you to court and I can provide the evidence to show what the EULA actually said at the time, and your inability, CCP, to explain how and why it is wrong. At which point any lawyer would laugh at you. Bear in mind, there's a 'terminate for any reason' clause in there. CCP have no obligation to do business with you. The difference with the DNSBlack thing is: CCP have a legal relationship with the authorized GTC seller. That relationship is not bound by the EULA, but by a different legal document (which we've not seen) At no point does money pass directly from the GTC buyer to Somer. Now, I'm not saying that it can't be considered to be RMT. But it's still a different relationship, which a regular player doesn't have. Something to consider: People sell starter packs, which give people a bunch of stuff in game. Limited to new characters only, but again, that sale isn't bound by the EULA. However, if the EULA is proven to not be enforced correctly and in a fair manner, the courts themselves will side with a party that has been wronged. It's fraud. And what, exactly, do you think the courts will do about it?
Assuming thousands of dollars are involved per transaction, small claims courts have jurisdiction. |

Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
54
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 06:54:00 -
[1196] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:DarkDecay wrote:By leaving EVE we have affected it in a manner that is very hard for CCP to ignore. Most places, Money Talks and Bullshit Walks. In EVE, it's the other way around.
Disagree.
In the infamous "Greed Is Good" memo CCP straight up said that as long as subscription numbers aren't affected, they don't care.
Which makes a certain kind of sense. Of course, once a policy like that becomes public, it might tend to push people to unsub instead of wait-and-see, since they know wait-and-see may not get a reaction. |

Sugar Von MurdererTits
D'reg The Methodical Alliance
79
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 07:54:00 -
[1197] - Quote
So I have about two days left on my account before time runs out. Has CCP actually announced what they plan to do about this or are they still employing the 'ignore it until the problem goes away' tactic? I stopped reading around page 30 or so and glancing through I really can't see anything except some mention of surveys.
I someone could post a quick tl;dr I'd be most appreciative.
P.S. No you can't have my stuff; I already gave it away. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 08:07:00 -
[1198] - Quote
They were going to to a blog at the end of the first week, then wait until after vegas, now waiting for an unspecified length of time.
They waiting for the dust to settle and a few players to unsub, they will then brush it under the carpet giving a hint that it has : all changed and it won't happen again/ were shocked over the reaction/ most people liked it but it was just a few load mouths which had a problem/' will set up a a council elected by players to make people feel more involved in the proccess and act as a sounding board so stupid idea's by CCP won't happen again/ admit that Navigator was really Somer's ***** all along/ won't roll back this but in the future it will be diferent apart from at times when it will be the same.
But we still expected to just wait and see and trust they will do the right thing, yet the longer these things go on the more time they have to just cover it up and carry on as they like. |

Frying Doom
2773
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 08:41:00 -
[1199] - Quote
Sugar Von MurdererTits wrote:So I have about two days left on my account before time runs out. Has CCP actually announced what they plan to do about this or are they still employing the 'ignore it until the problem goes away' tactic? I stopped reading around page 30 or so and glancing through I really can't see anything except some mention of surveys.
I someone could post a quick tl;dr I'd be most appreciative.
P.S. No you can't have my stuff; I already gave it away. They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

The Legendary Soldier
A New Beginning
257
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 09:35:00 -
[1200] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.
There, fixed that for you :p
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |
|

Frying Doom
2774
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 09:55:00 -
[1201] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Frying Doom wrote: They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.
There, fixed that for you :p Thank you for your correction of my obvious mistake.
I wonder if we will get to have a player elected body to oversee these types of crisis and to check up on the CCP Devs, Internal affairs and the current CSM? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
29
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 11:03:00 -
[1202] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:Frying Doom wrote: They are apparently doing a survey and are taking months to NOT resolve the matter.
Funny it does not take them months to stop RMT when it doesn't involve Somer.
There, fixed that for you :p Thank you for your correction of my obvious mistake. I wonder if we will get to have a player elected body to oversee these types of crisis and to check up on the CCP Devs, Internal affairs and the current CSM? 
Now that is funny!!
I still demand an apology from Hellmar and 6 months of subscriptions for everyone to prove he is sincere this time. |

Sugar Von MurdererTits
D'reg The Methodical Alliance
80
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 12:21:00 -
[1203] - Quote
Thanks for the info. What a shame though; I was really hoping they would do the right thing by their players but I guess that was too much to hope for.  |

DarkDecay
Real Money Traders
94
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 12:44:00 -
[1204] - Quote
Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do...
Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219 So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok?
---
I cant haz a sig so http://www.eve-search.com/thread/285492-1/page/35#1035
|

Frying Doom
2779
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 13:19:00 -
[1205] - Quote
DarkDecay wrote:Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do... Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok? I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games.
Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them 
The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 13:32:00 -
[1206] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:DarkDecay wrote:Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do... Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok? I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games. Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them  The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs?
Yeah no ****, "lets point at something obscure and avoid RMT."
|

Frying Doom
2787
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:01:00 -
[1207] - Quote
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:Frying Doom wrote:DarkDecay wrote:Damn, two hours left on my last account and I cant think of anything good/funny to say in what could be my last ever post, this will have to do... Saw the reason CCP closed DNS's thread and it had nothing to do with rmt. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219So if you sell a character for $$$ without using a lottery it is ok? I am sure I will see you else where, have fun in non-RMT games. Interesting they closed the thread on the lottery angle but I suppose if they closed it for RMT too many people would be laughing our asses off at them  The other question is of course was the transfer successful? or did they dig them selves a bigger pit, deleting the character while Somer still RMTs? Yeah no ****, "lets point at something obscure and avoid RMT." They should have just said he failed to write the post with orange text, it would make about as much sense. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:18:00 -
[1208] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3755219#post3755219
CCP Falcon wrote:Lotteries for character sales are not permitted under the Character Bazaar Rules. As such, this thread is locked. Quote wrote: 17. Lottery style sales are not permitted. Auctions and buyouts are the appropriate method for selling a character.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=285492&p=51
Money Makin Mitch wrote:he didn't lotto the character. he lotto'ed a chance to bid on the character.
raven666wings wrote:You're missing the point. Just like MMMitch told you before, he didn't directly raffle the character, he raffled a chance to get a Buyout on it. So he didn't sell it using a Lottery, he still sold it using an Auction and Buyout in the Character Bazaar forum section, just like the normal procedure endorsed by CCP for character exchange. The object of the raffle being a character buyout, plexes, ships or isk doesn't matter according to Somer Blink, Eve-Games.net and other unsanctioned in-game item raffling conducts, as long as they're all tranferred by the CCP designated trading mechanisms.
raven666wings wrote:You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
274
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:22:00 -
[1209] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future.
We don't need to put words in your mouth. Your actions speak louder. |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
31
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 14:24:00 -
[1210] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Moving your thread is not endorsement, it's making sure that it's in the correct forum for the topic.
Discussion is still ongoing internally regarding this kind of practice.
Reference to any endorsement of this by CCP Staff have been removed until an decision is made regarding it rather than misinformation.
Don't put words in my mouth in future. We don't need to put words in your mouth. Your actions speak louder.
Loud and clear |
|

Kate stark
718
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 17:15:00 -
[1211] - Quote
is eve vegas still going? i assume not.
so, any chance of an update since we've been waiting quite a while for one? even better; how about that survey? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
455
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 18:37:00 -
[1212] - Quote
EVE Vegas is over, and the readers of this thread may find this interesting:
http://evenews24.com/2013/10/22/jesters-trek-sponsor-and-gamble/
|

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
33
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 19:45:00 -
[1213] - Quote
I call it Damage Control
lol or as one of the responders posted... DCII
|

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
439
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 19:53:00 -
[1214] - Quote
CCP will never receive another real life penny from me.
No you can't have my stuff. I'm switching to plexing 3 accounts for a couple months then wondering why the hell I play just to be able to buy plex and then quit so come back and ask me in a couple months. Not today spaghetti. |

Josef Djugashvilis
Acme Mining Corporation
1467
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:19:00 -
[1215] - Quote
Surely it would be better for folk to await the outcome of the Somer Blink et al - 'freebies to friends of CCP' debacle, then make a decision to quit or stay?
It seems to me that CCP have accidentally stumbled into this mess, rather than gone into it with malice aforethought, and are now considering their options, which will be based in part on the feedback from the proposed survey.
One always to bear in mind that Eve Online is a game to us, but in reality Eve Online is a business model to generate money for CCP.
My gut feeling is that CCP will weigh up the cost of the money gained from their association with the likes of Somer Blink against the potential financial cost of lost accounts and act accordingly.
I sincerely hope I am wrong and that CCP stop favouring in-game corps with valuable in-game assets, simply because it is wrong. This is not a signature. |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
38
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:30:00 -
[1216] - Quote
I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...
But this has happened before, at least twice that I am aware of. |

The Legendary Soldier
A New Beginning
260
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 20:34:00 -
[1217] - Quote
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...
CCP is waiting it out - if we wait it out too - that will be the last we hear of it.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
720
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 21:20:00 -
[1218] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Xeen Du'Wang wrote:I would agree that it could be worth waiting out...
CCP is waiting it out - if we wait it out too - that will be the last we hear of it.
i fear this is the truth.
while people are still feeding them subscriptions they have no reason to address the issue. however if those that have dropped their subscriptions don't get a say in these elusive surveys and ccp goes "hey look guys; you all said it was fine!" and still don't address the issue...
well, well played ccp you managed to not bother fixing an issue. round of applause. **** me this game is making me even more cynical than usual.
and to think; all of this could have been avoided if they'd just created a community rewards program before giving out community rewards... just like getting dressed before you leave the house, rather than afterwards... Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Frying Doom
2797
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 22:17:00 -
[1219] - Quote
Something more sinister than RMT is occuring here
Now I have from time to time played Somer Blink. I have gotten my isk from in game and sent them to Somers Corp and received my Somer Credit in return. I have gambled my isk and won it back and been happy.
My fake in game isk went in and I got fake in game isk out. Now I thought nothing more of this until the whole Gold Magnate, Ishukone Watch Scorpions and finally RMT came up.
Now why is it fake isk
EULA wrote:B. Selling Items and Objects
You may not transfer, sell or auction, or buy or accept any offer to transfer, sell or auction (or offer to do any of the foregoing), any content appearing within the Game environment, including without limitation characters, character attributes, items, currency, and objects, other than via a permitted Character Transfer as described in section 3 above. You may not encourage or induce any other person to participate in such a prohibited transaction. The buying, selling or auctioning (or any attempt at doing so) of characters, character attributes, items, currency, or objects, whether through online auctions, newsgroups, postings on message boards or any other means is prohibited by the EULA and a violation of CCP's proprietary rights in the Game.
So the in-game isk are the property of CCP.
Now I will admit I did not think anything of this, until in one of the many posts on Somers RMT, someone proudly stated that they had over time purchased over 1000 GTC and received the extra isk and converted the Plex into isk for gambling, they even showed their winnings.
Now how is this wrong, I hear you ask? Well people are gambling real money, in this case over $35,000 USD to gamble on Somer Blinks site. They Buy the GTC and convert them to Blink Credit as well as get the bonus credit as well, they gamble winning some and losing some and then convert it back to in game isk, at which point it becomes the property of CCP. I am sure like all gambling there are many more stories like this out there.
So people are gambling real money with no ability to receive real money back, they are throwing tens of thousands of dollars into gambling with all of the thrills and enticements of gambling but they have no ability to win anything back.
That is a scam pure and simple. It picks on those people who do not have the ability to control there gambling while at the same time allowing children to gamble on their site.
Now is CCP responsible as Somer Blink is its own separate entity? Well yes as CCP is an integral part of the chain as they provide the means to convert real money into Somer Credits. The fact that they do not run the gambling site its self matters little, they are the banker as it where.
Now CCP has turned a blind eye to Somer blink with the EULA, even if they were not in breach of the EULA in relation to ETC/GTC RMT sales, they are most definitely in breach of
EULA wrote:Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited. So CCP have very much broken their own rules in this and become a partner in Gambling.
Now given that CCPs servers are located in the UK, they are required to be licensed by the Gambling Commission they are not.
This of course leads to the question, at what point does EvE stop being a game and start to be a gambling site and should be forced to follow all of the rules and laws governing such sites. Well frankly when people are spending tens of thousands of dollars to gamble.
This is not one of my normal pick on CCP threads, this is a real issue effecting real people, RMT is pale in comparison to the damage uncontrolled gambling can do. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
506
|
Posted - 2013.10.22 22:18:00 -
[1220] - Quote
Funny how CCP could find the time to ***** about someone calling CCP Mintchip a "*****" on an EvE Radio show, but can't take the time to explain their EULA to us. |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:09:00 -
[1221] - Quote
In this particular case I don't think you'll be able to get back at CCP from a legal standpoint. For all effects, they are merely selling their business product, the Game Time Codes (albeit through a 3rd party referral system to increase sales and even rewarding it for the effort).
They are indeed not enforcing their own EULA and Term of Service rules to certain costumer(s), but I don't think that there is anything forcing them to. These EULA and ToS documents are created by these companies to act as legal backup that gives them full legitimacy to do whatever they want with the game and the costumers' accounts, they aren't created to protect the costumers in case the company decides to violate its own rules. There is no rule in the whole documents that forces them to enforce any of the other rules.
However there might be national laws written in the Business Code (either in Iceland or in Britain) that forbid a service providing company to have double standards when serving its costumers. It's a matter of contacting the Icelandic Consumer Defense Agency and inquiring them about the existance of such or related regulations and find out whether a lawsuit under such grounds may be filed. If the costumer service double standards are a violation of any existing Icelanding Business law and CCP's practice can be proven in court, then there is the possibility that the judge will deem them guilty of such practice.
Regarding Somer Blink, the best way to legally get back at him at the moment is to contact the Tax Administration Office of the country where he lives and inform them of his activity. He's most likely not declaring any of the income he's getting from the GTC referrals and just that situation has the potential to confiscate a big part (if not the total) of his profits. Like CCP he wont be suceptible of being sued for illegal gambling because he's merely doing it with fake money inside the game, while receiving a real money fee for the referral of the GTC sales. |

Frying Doom
2799
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:12:00 -
[1222] - Quote
Same page as before
Laws Australia
Wikipedia wrote:Australia
On 28 June 2001 the Australian Government passed the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 (IGA). The government said that the IGA was important to protect Australians from the harmful effects of gambling.
The IGA targets the providers of interactive gambling services. The IGA makes it an offence to provide an interactive gambling service to a customer physically present in Australia, but it is not an offence for Australian residents to play poker or casino games online. In stark contrast to the USA, sports betting online is also completely legal in Australia, with many state government licensed sportsbooks in operation, such as Centrebet, Sportingbet & Betfair.
The offense applies to all interactive gambling service providers, whether based in Australia or offshore, whether Australian or foreign owned. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_gambling Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Frying Doom
2799
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:15:00 -
[1223] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:In this particular case I don't think you'll be able to get back at them from a legal standpoint. For all effects, they are merely selling their business product, the Game Time Codes (albeit through a 3rd party referral system to increase sales and even rewarding it for the effort). They are indeed not enforcing their own EULA and Term of Service rules to certain costumer(s), but I don't think that there is anything forcing them to. These EULA and ToS documents are created by these companies to act as legal backup that gives them full legitimacy to do whatever they want with the game and the costumers' accounts, they aren't created to protect the costumers in case the company decides to violate its own rules. There is no rule in the whole documents that forces them to enforce any of the other rules. However there might be national laws written in the Business Code (either in Iceland or in Britain) that forbid a service providing company to have double standards when serving its costumers. It's a matter of contacting the Icelandic Consumer Defense Agency and inquiring them about the existance of such or related regulations and find out whether a lawsuit under such grounds may be filed. If the costumer service double standards are a violation of any existing Icelanding Business law and CCP's practice can be proven in court, then there is the possibility that the judge will deem them guilty of such practice. Regarding Somer Blink, the best way to legally get back at him at the moment is to contact the Tax Administration Office of the country where he lives and inform them of his activity. He's most likely not declaring any of the income he's getting from the GTC referrals and just that situation has the potential to confiscate a big part (if not the total) of his profits. Like CCP he wont be suceptible of being sued for illegal gambling because he's merely doing it with fake money inside the game, while receiving a real money fee for the referral of the GTC sales. Please see U. S. v. Scheinberg et al. in post on previous page.
'The indictment alleges that the companies used fraudulent methods to evade this law, for example, by disguising online gambling payments as purchases of merchandise' Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:21:00 -
[1224] - Quote
Please see U. S. v. Scheinberg et al. in post on previous page.
'The indictment alleges that the companies used fraudulent methods to evade this law, for example, by disguising online gambling payments as purchases of merchandise'[/quote]
You are putting this in the same bag as online gambling with real money, but that's not what's happening here. They are converting the real money into isk and rewarding the 3rd party with real money for the increased GTC sales, but still gambling with fake money only. Only if the isk was converted back to real money would this example apply. |

Frying Doom
2799
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:23:00 -
[1225] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Please see U. S. v. Scheinberg et al. in post on previous page.
'The indictment alleges that the companies used fraudulent methods to evade this law, for example, by disguising online gambling payments as purchases of merchandise' You are putting this in the same bag as online gambling with real money, but that's not what's happening here. They are converting the real money into isk and rewarding the 3rd party with real money for the increased GTC sales, but still gambling with fake money only. Only if the isk was converted back to real money would this example apply. So the fact that people are gambling with real money and have no hope of a payout makes it better? Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:25:00 -
[1226] - Quote
They're gambling with fake money only and there isn't any law that forbids that. |

Frying Doom
2799
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:29:00 -
[1227] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:They're gambling with fake money only and there isn't any law that forbids that. People are buying 'Merchandise' with real money, with which to gamble. Not much different than buying poker chips to gamble, except that you will lose 100% of the time unless you convert your winnings into plex to pay for your account.
So in this case the bank wins 100% of the time. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 00:38:00 -
[1228] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:raven666wings wrote:They're gambling with fake money only and there isn't any law that forbids that. People are buying 'Merchandise' with real money, with which to gamble. Not much different than buying poker chips to gamble, except that you will lose 100% of the time unless you convert your winnings into plex to pay for your account. So in this case the bank wins 100% of the time.
You can legally buy the PLEX or GTC's coupled with isk tokens and gable with them inside the game, as long as the gabling service does not reward you with real money. It isn't illegal. For all effects they are selling you the company's service.
Note: I hope you understand I'm trying to evaluate a possible legal standpoint to advocate the players' rights, not CCP or Somer Blink's conducts. |

Frying Doom
2799
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:06:00 -
[1229] - Quote
As this matter is clearly one for the criminal courts of multiple jurisdictions to decide, it would be inappropriate to comment further.
To be honest I should not have commented at all. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
507
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 01:52:00 -
[1230] - Quote
I won't go into any more on the legal aspect just yet, because I would need to cross-check my sources. However, I think if anything it would st art as a civil case in the United States. If there was a judgment against CCP, then the government could look at criminal charges for money laundering and RICO.
However, I don't think--or want--it to be that serious. I want fair application to the EULA by CCP. |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:03:00 -
[1231] - Quote
Like I wrote before, the only legal ground you could defend here is the double standards verified when providing service to certain clients, by not enforcing the EULA or ToS rules to them. The illegal gambling and money laundering accusations are, in my opinion, not fundamented. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
132
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 03:11:00 -
[1232] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Surely it would be better for folk to await the outcome of the Somer Blink et al - 'freebies to friends of CCP' debacle, then make a decision to quit or stay?
It seems to me that CCP have accidentally stumbled into this mess, rather than gone into it with malice aforethought, and are now considering their options, which will be based in part on the feedback from the proposed survey.
One always to bear in mind that Eve Online is a game to us, but in reality Eve Online is a business model to generate money for CCP.
My gut feeling is that CCP will weigh up the cost of the money gained from their association with the likes of Somer Blink against the potential financial cost of lost accounts and act accordingly.
I sincerely hope I am wrong and that CCP stop favouring in-game corps with valuable in-game assets, simply because it is wrong.
Unfortunately, we really don't have the luxury of waiting this out. We can complain all that we want, but as long as people are not unsubscribing in large numbers, CCP will think that we are fine with this, and that sends the wrong message.
if they go to weigh the costs, and we are still paying our subscriptions, they will have an incorrect view of what the real costs are of continuing this course of action.
The clearest message we can send is mass cancellation of accounts. If CCP gets their act together, then maybe some or all will return, depending on how satisfactory the solution is. But if we just wait around for CCP to continue to drag their feet, then we are counted as accepting things as they are.
Due to a 3-month sub plan, my account isn't up until mid November, so I'll still be here complaining for a while, but I've already shut down my recurring billing over this. Here's hoping CCP gets the message. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2754
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 04:49:00 -
[1233] - Quote
You guys are barking up the wrong tree on this legal stuff. I'm telling you. Only a fraction of you would have the time, nerve, or money to actually put forth a suit. That suit would just be laughed out of court. You wouldn't make it past the initial hearing. Promise. Remember... in-game items (PLEX included) don't even exist, legally.
Unsubbing would get CCPs attention, but it's about money. It's about policy... not law.
T20 compelled real action on CCPs part. Wait and see how they respond. They are reading these threads. They could respond with something really cool... they have a lot of sharp people working for them. The changes made after T20 were excellent and greatly strengthened CCP and the game itself overall, imho. I'm holding out hope that the game will be better when they decide what to do. Rubicon is crazy awesome. The are making huge changes. They could be bold... we'll see.
There's a wax and wane to the game for sure. Apocrypha up to Rubicon we've been on the wane, and I think everyone sees that. I think Rubicon is going to be huge. It's one of the craziest updates I've seen since I started playing. It opens up a lot of new gameplay. I think CCP sees that too, and so do the players. After Rubicon launches I think we'll see a surge in players, no matter what CCP does about this. The question is will that surge be sustained, or will we wane again once the "shiny" has dulled. Watching BF4 trailers I think DUST is going to be a steep hill for them to climb. I think EvE Valkyrie could open up a whole new market... nothing I'm saying here should be a surprise to anyone. I think most people would agree with me. ...but it's a scary time for CCP. Getting ready to launch a third game while the second starves to death and this one wanes? Yikes. Their hesitation is understandable. I mean... f*** everything else, we're talking about the future of the company and the livelihoods of a fair number of people. Put yourself in their shoes.
So yah this has been bulls***, yah it's SOMER doing 'legit' RMT, and yah we want a response... but the decisions they make from here on out are big, far reaching, and risky no matter what. With a game this complex you just can't tell what will happen no matter what. I for one am not surprised we haven't heard anything yet. They'll probably say something before too long... but getting dramatic about this... not going to do much. The answers are bigger than the players commenting here. Str8up.
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 14:59:00 -
[1234] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:... however there are additional rules regarding Character sale when compared to any other type. That's my point and if CCP so chooses, they could use those additional rules
raven666wings wrote:You're missing the point
Handsome Feller wrote:You're hiding behind details. Details which CCP are more than free to ignore when the inputs and outputs boils down to this:
Buy Lottery Tickets Receive chance of getting a character
Add as many steps & details in between as you like, but it breaks down the same. Must buy lottery ticket to get character.
raven666wings wrote:You're still missing the point. They aren't "hiding behind details". They are using the same procedure used by Somer Blink and others that has not only been unsanctioned, but also supported and advertised by CCP.
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 14:59:00 -
[1235] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:No I'm not missing the point. I understand that. You are missing what I have been pointing out all along. Character transfers / sales have different rules to ships etc.
raven666wings wrote:Yes, once again you are still missing the point
Handsome Feller wrote:You're going round in circles. No point continuing.
raven666wings wrote:Lol you definitely should have read the thread before fallin here in a parachute ... PS - You should consider writing english in further posts.
|

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 14:59:00 -
[1236] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:As it is, CCP could, if they so choose to, easily justify a ban hammer ... due to it being a character sale.
CCP Falcon wrote:Lotteries for character sales are not permitted under the Character Bazaar Rules.
As such, this thread is locked.
Hey raven666wings, I knew I wasn't exactly up against any sort of mental might, but I just thought I'd point out how I was right and you were so very wrong. Love how you moaned on about me not getting the point when the point I was making turned out to be superbly accurate and your point wholly inaccurate. I guess life must be tough for you. Oh and just one more thing...
raven666wings wrote:I hope you didn't get brain damage of some sort. |

Sugar Von MurdererTits
D'reg The Methodical Alliance
85
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 15:01:00 -
[1237] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Surely it would be better for folk to await the outcome of the Somer Blink et al - 'freebies to friends of CCP' debacle, then make a decision to quit or stay?
You said it yourself:
Quote:My gut feeling is that CCP will weigh up the cost of the money gained from their association with the likes of Somer Blink against the potential financial cost of lost accounts and act accordingly.
That's exactly why. CCP won't take this seriously until they feel a financial impact.
I really enjoy Eve. I even bought the collector's edition as a gift for my hubby. But I don't like that CCP give kickbacks to people who, let's be blunt, earn them money by exploiting gambling addictions. The legality isn't important to me; it's immoral. And I also don't want to play a game where certain select players can bend the EULA to the breaking point while others get banned.
If CCP do something that I feel adequately addresses the issues I can always resub. But I won't hold my breath.
Anyway, this the last from me. Fly safe all. o7 |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2524
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 15:12:00 -
[1238] - Quote
Sugar Von MurdererTits wrote:Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Surely it would be better for folk to await the outcome of the Somer Blink et al - 'freebies to friends of CCP' debacle, then make a decision to quit or stay?
You said it yourself: Quote:My gut feeling is that CCP will weigh up the cost of the money gained from their association with the likes of Somer Blink against the potential financial cost of lost accounts and act accordingly. That's exactly why. CCP won't take this seriously until they feel a financial impact. I really enjoy Eve. I even bought the collector's edition as a gift for my hubby. But I don't like that CCP give kickbacks to people who, let's be blunt, earn them money by exploiting gambling addictions. The legality isn't important to me; it's immoral. And I also don't want to play a game where certain select players can bend the EULA to the breaking point while others get banned. If CCP do something that I feel adequately addresses the issues I can always resub. But I won't hold my breath. Anyway, this the last from me. Fly safe all. o7
Yes, I don't quite care about the legality (I think it'd be a stretch to say CCP have done anything legally wrong), but I do find it quite... distasteful... that they seem to favour organisations that thrive off addictions and which operate solely for their own benefits (rather than all the organisations that operate for the sake of the community)
The fact that CCP have went silent after giving a half-arsed reply that didn't address the biggest issues is the lamest part. Every single person can see that for what it is: Burying your head in the sand and hoping it'll blow over. Maybe it will, but I'm personally done. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 15:49:00 -
[1239] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Hey raven666wings, I knew I wasn't exactly up against any sort of mental might, but I just thought I'd point out how I was right and you were so very wrong. Love how you moaned on about me not getting the point when the point I was making turned out to be superbly accurate and your point wholly inaccurate. I guess life must be tough for you. Oh and just one more thing...
Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy).
Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean your right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did. |

Handsome Feller
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
11
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 16:32:00 -
[1240] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:Hey raven666wings, I knew I wasn't exactly up against any sort of mental might, but I just thought I'd point out how I was right and you were so very wrong. Love how you moaned on about me not getting the point when the point I was making turned out to be superbly accurate and your point wholly inaccurate. I guess life must be tough for you. Oh and just one more thing... Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy). Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean you were right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did.
You can try to change history, but you'll fail. Unless you manage to hack these forums I guess. Though CCP probably have backups. Poor you.
I do wonder why you are pretending I was not correct. Do you always have this many issues with reality?
Me: I think CCP could invoke the lottery rule for character sales here. Shame dnsblack didn't do this with an iScorp. You: No you're missing the point. You are wrong. You're missing the point. You're missing the point. You're wrong. CCP: We are invoking the lottery rule for character sales and putting an end to this sale.
Even with me being proven correct, you're still pretending that's not how it is. Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon. |
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 16:42:00 -
[1241] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote: Even with me being proven correct, you're still pretending that's not how it is. Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon.
Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy).
Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean you were right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
280
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 16:49:00 -
[1242] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon.
Don't go away yet. Please continue your desperate display of irrational justification for arbitrary judgement actions. It's kind of entertaining to watch. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
431
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 17:50:00 -
[1243] - Quote
Handsome Feller wrote:raven666wings wrote:Handsome Feller wrote:Hey raven666wings, I knew I wasn't exactly up against any sort of mental might, but I just thought I'd point out how I was right and you were so very wrong. Love how you moaned on about me not getting the point when the point I was making turned out to be superbly accurate and your point wholly inaccurate. I guess life must be tough for you. Oh and just one more thing... Your recurrent use of formal fallacies doesn't seem voluntary, what you're presenting really seems incapacity of racional thought (hence the brain damage analogy). Having a CCP representative lock that thread doesn't mean you were right. It means he acted on arbitrary judgement and/or misinterpreted the situation like you did. You can try to change history, but you'll fail. Unless you manage to hack these forums I guess. Though CCP probably have backups. Poor you. I do wonder why you are pretending I was not correct. Do you always have this many issues with reality? Me: I think CCP could invoke the lottery rule for character sales here. Shame dnsblack didn't do this with an iScorp. You: No you're missing the point. You are wrong. You're missing the point. You're missing the point. You're wrong. CCP: We are invoking the lottery rule for character sales and putting an end to this sale. Even with me being proven correct, you're still pretending that's not how it is. Delusional isn't a sufficient word here. I'll not bother to reply anymore as at best, you're being thoroughly dishonest and at worst, you need to seek professional help to get you back in touch with reality. I hope you get better soon.
Mate you are wrong and seem to be missing the point. |

Frying Doom
2802
|
Posted - 2013.10.23 22:32:00 -
[1244] - Quote
I will admit I think EvE seems like a smaller place without DNS black to put us to sleep at the Fanfest. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
3148
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 01:36:00 -
[1245] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I will admit I think EvE seems like a smaller place without DNS black to put us to sleep at the Fanfest. DNSBLACK is many things, but a sleeping aid is not one of them. Like any honest politician, "My door is always open, and my hand is always out" |

Frying Doom
2803
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 05:35:00 -
[1246] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I will admit I think EvE seems like a smaller place without DNS black to put us to sleep at the Fanfest. DNSBLACK is many things, but a sleeping aid is not one of them. The alliance panel was always a good sedative  Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Katarina Reid
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 10:03:00 -
[1247] - Quote
GTC's with 300mil isk bonus. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=289554 |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
281
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 16:54:00 -
[1248] - Quote
Gogela wrote:...but it's a scary time for CCP. Getting ready to launch a third game while the second starves to death and this one wanes? Yikes. Their hesitation is understandable.
Dude, I normally agree with your points of view, but im gonna have to disagree on this. You're asking us to show clemency to a corporation ran by a board of capitalists who care about nothing else but the ammount of money in their bank accounts. A corporation that calls itself "Crowd Control Productions". A corporation that presents its costumers with a ruthless "We are a business and our goal is to make money" statement everytime it is questioned about its engagement with "business partners". A corporation that uses dirty tricks to scam the costumers left and right while telling them to accept it because it's for the benefit of "The Corporation". They are hesitating over the side project development and 3rd party deals they have made recently? Excuse me, but .. What do I care? Was it us that told them to engage in such practices?
Gogela wrote:I mean... f*** everything else, we're talking about the future of the company and the livelihoods of a fair number of people. Put yourself in their shoes. Dude please, you're the one making a drama out of this, not the players posting here. You're asking us to keep feeding such corporation with our money? You wanna know what I have to say to that? -F*ck everything else? NO. F*ck the Corportation. I am a costumer and my goal is to get a quality gameplay service on my computer, it's not to waste my money on a biased sandbox, or paying the salaries of people that are trying to find ways to scam me or working on other games that I am not playing. Until the corporation is willing to hear me and give me what I want, i will not give it what it wants. It's as simple as that.
Gogela wrote:So yah this has been bulls***, yah it's SOMER doing 'legit' RMT, and yah we want a response... but the decisions they make from here on out are big, far reaching, and risky no matter what. With a game this complex you just can't tell what will happen no matter what. I for one am not surprised we haven't heard anything yet. They'll probably say something before too long... but getting dramatic about this... not going to do much. The answers are bigger than the players commenting here. Str8up.
No, the answers are not bigger than the players commenting here. The players are, in case you and them forgot, the most important part of this mess because they are the ones who pay for this show. Without money the show won't go on. So "The Corporation" better keep that in mind, start listening to us and do what we want. |

Kate stark
728
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 17:03:00 -
[1249] - Quote
i see there are still no noteworthy developments?
where are CCP off to on holiday this weekend then? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
24
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 18:16:00 -
[1250] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:i see there are still no noteworthy developments?
where are CCP off to on holiday this weekend then?
You mean they are back from the previous one?
|
|

Kate stark
732
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 18:22:00 -
[1251] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:Kate stark wrote:i see there are still no noteworthy developments?
where are CCP off to on holiday this weekend then? You mean they are back from the previous one?
i have no idea. is eve vegas still going on? nobody corrected me when i assumed it had finished so.... Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2754
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 18:35:00 -
[1252] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Gogela wrote:...but it's a scary time for CCP. Getting ready to launch a third game while the second starves to death and this one wanes? Yikes. Their hesitation is understandable. Dude, I normally agree with your points of view, but I'm gonna have to disagree on this. You're asking us to show clemency to a corporation ran by a board of capitalists who care about nothing but the ammount of money in their bank accounts. A corporation that calls itself " Crowd Control Productions". A corporation that presents its costumers with a ruthless "We are a business and our goal is to make money" statement everytime it is questioned about its engagement with "business partners". A corporation that uses dirty tricks to scam the costumers left and right while telling them to accept it because it's for the benefit of "The Corporation". They are hesitating over side project developments and 3rd party deals they have recently made? Excuse me, but... What do I got to do with that? What do I care? Was it us that told them to engage in such practices? Gogela wrote:I mean... f*** everything else, we're talking about the future of the company and the livelihoods of a fair number of people. Put yourself in their shoes. Dude please, you're the one making a drama out of this, not the players posting here. If Somer Blink's actions are to be shutdown and deemed illegitimate to not allow others to engage in the same conduct, all CCP employees involved in the scandal need to be fired like in T20, from the big fish on top of the chain to the small one below. You're asking us to keep feeding such corporation with our money? You wanna know what I have to say to that? -F*ck everything else? NO. F*ck the Corporation. I am a costumer and my goal is to get a quality gameplay service on my computer, it's not to waste my money on a biased sandbox game, or paying the salaries of people that are trying to find ways to scam me or working on other games that I am not playing. Until the corporation is willing to hear me and give me what I want, I will not give it what it wants. It's that simple. Gogela wrote:So yah this has been bulls***, yah it's SOMER doing 'legit' RMT, and yah we want a response... but the decisions they make from here on out are big, far reaching, and risky no matter what. With a game this complex you just can't tell what will happen no matter what. I for one am not surprised we haven't heard anything yet. They'll probably say something before too long... but getting dramatic about this... not going to do much. The answers are bigger than the players commenting here. Str8up. No, the answers are not bigger than the players commenting here. The players are, in case you and them forgot, the most important part of this mess because they are the ones who pay for this show. Without money the show won't go on. So "The Corporation" better keep that in mind, start listening to us and do what we want if it wants to get our money. ...just trying to inject some sobriety. I don't disagree with any particular point you're making personally, I'm just saying there are other points of view in play here, and if you want to compel change it behooves us to consider that. This thing is a ticking time bomb. Right now things are imbalanced. It's not the chessboard most think it to be. CCP makes the wrong move here and the real danger to them isn't the reality (because that's already jacked), it's player perceptions. If the bulk of the players don't think it's a level playing field, accounts are going to start bleeding away. We'll have a big deflationary period in the markets, and then it's going to be like the serenity server. Boring.
The Gogela abides...
|

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
198
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 17:29:00 -
[1253] - Quote
i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before.
nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now  |

Kate stark
741
|
Posted - 2013.10.25 19:37:00 -
[1254] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before. nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now 
"if you think them having more isk and sp is unfair.. wait until i tell you that ccp are giving them free stuff to. like trying to ice skate up a hill mate." Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

AayJay Crendraven
Dakka Unlimited
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 02:03:00 -
[1255] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before. nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now  "if you think them having more isk and sp is unfair.. wait until i tell you that ccp are giving them free stuff to. like trying to ice skate up a hill mate."
Some motherf****** are always tryin' to ice skate uphill... |

Kate stark
745
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 07:04:00 -
[1256] - Quote
AayJay Crendraven wrote:Kate stark wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before. nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now  "if you think them having more isk and sp is unfair.. wait until i tell you that ccp are giving them free stuff to. like trying to ice skate up a hill mate." Some motherf****** are always tryin' to ice skate uphill...
damn right that's what i was thinking when i typed that. i do like the blade films even if blade 3 was a giant ipod advert. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
458
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 15:01:00 -
[1257] - Quote
A bit off topic, but relevant I think given we have been talking about of conflicts of interest:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3787658#post3787658
Not sure that devs posting in and bumping recruitment threads is exactly the best idea. First, the simple act of dev-tagging one of these threads is like a bit of an endorsement (in fact I don't think I've ever seen one dev tagged before). Second, the dev pretty much reveals himsel to be a member of the corp in question. And there is the simple fact he violates the forum rules, not that it doesn't happen in that forum, just not usually with a dev tag.
Minor in the grand scheme of things - almost entertaining - but it certainly made me roll my eyes. Just goes to show you that training your folks in conflicts of interest is important stuff. |

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 16:09:00 -
[1258] - Quote
So who's the main IA guy these days? |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
284
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 16:12:00 -
[1259] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:AayJay Crendraven wrote:Kate stark wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:i convinced several people to not purchase the new starter packs on steam due to this. at least a handful of people won't be subscribing now whereas they would have before. nobody wants to play an unbalanced game. you guys hit my wallet, so i'm hitting yours now  "if you think them having more isk and sp is unfair.. wait until i tell you that ccp are giving them free stuff to. like trying to ice skate up a hill mate." Some motherf****** are always tryin' to ice skate uphill... damn right that's what i was thinking when i typed that. i do like the blade films even if blade 3 was a giant ipod advert.
Whats behind that door? -Can't tell you, they'll kill me. - Kill you? Motherf*cker I'll kill you, I'll just enjoy better
Blade & Wesley Snipes GÖÑ |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 21:54:00 -
[1260] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:A bit off topic, but relevant I think given we have been talking about of conflicts of interest: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3787658#post3787658Not sure that devs posting in and bumping recruitment threads is exactly the best idea. First, the simple act of dev-tagging one of these threads is like a bit of an endorsement (in fact I don't think I've ever seen one dev tagged before). Second, the dev pretty much reveals himsel to be a member of the corp in question. And there is the simple fact he violates the forum rules, not that it doesn't happen in that forum, just not usually with a dev tag. Minor in the grand scheme of things - almost entertaining - but it certainly made me roll my eyes. Just goes to show you that training your folks in conflicts of interest is important stuff.
I think that is very relevant.
He thought if he bumped that recruitment thread with his Dev account it would carry more weight. In the end all it did was cause complaints. |
|

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
433
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 22:52:00 -
[1261] - Quote
Reported  |

DNSBLACK
Aliastra Gallente Federation
470
|
Posted - 2013.10.26 23:22:00 -
[1262] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:A bit off topic, but relevant I think given we have been talking about of conflicts of interest: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3787658#post3787658Not sure that devs posting in and bumping recruitment threads is exactly the best idea. First, the simple act of dev-tagging one of these threads is like a bit of an endorsement (in fact I don't think I've ever seen one dev tagged before). Second, the dev pretty much reveals himsel to be a member of the corp in question. And there is the simple fact he violates the forum rules, not that it doesn't happen in that forum, just not usually with a dev tag. Minor in the grand scheme of things - almost entertaining - but it certainly made me roll my eyes. Just goes to show you that training your folks in conflicts of interest is important stuff.
Have no fear iam still here. I have been banned - un banned - locked - unlocked - character transfer denied - character transfer in limbo.
Now that my friend Argus has pointed this out OMG WTF CCP really. I hope this is a hack job if it isn't then let the revolt begin. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
285
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 02:01:00 -
[1263] - Quote
Have you not heard yet? What planet you live on??? Wake up to lyfe dude!
CCP Phantom wrote:Offering a (small) ISK bonus for doing community work in a provable way is from my personal perspective fine. |

Frying Doom
2807
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 03:44:00 -
[1264] - Quote
DNSBLACK wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:A bit off topic, but relevant I think given we have been talking about of conflicts of interest: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3787658#post3787658Not sure that devs posting in and bumping recruitment threads is exactly the best idea. First, the simple act of dev-tagging one of these threads is like a bit of an endorsement (in fact I don't think I've ever seen one dev tagged before). Second, the dev pretty much reveals himsel to be a member of the corp in question. And there is the simple fact he violates the forum rules, not that it doesn't happen in that forum, just not usually with a dev tag. Minor in the grand scheme of things - almost entertaining - but it certainly made me roll my eyes. Just goes to show you that training your folks in conflicts of interest is important stuff. Have no fear iam still here. I have been banned - un banned - locked - unlocked - character transfer denied - character transfer in limbo. Now that my friend Argus has pointed this out OMG WTF CCP really. I hope this is a hack job if it isn't then let the revolt begin. I think the following sentance sums the whole thing up well.
CCP really is nothing more than a Joke. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Kate stark
753
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 18:09:00 -
[1265] - Quote
so let's see; we were told not to have a thread dominated by a small number of people.
we could always have a wider group of posters if CCP decided to let some one other than guard give us an update. or, let guard do it. either is fine with me. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kirren D'marr
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
138
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 23:10:00 -
[1266] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:A bit off topic, but relevant I think given we have been talking about of conflicts of interest: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3787658#post3787658Not sure that devs posting in and bumping recruitment threads is exactly the best idea. First, the simple act of dev-tagging one of these threads is like a bit of an endorsement (in fact I don't think I've ever seen one dev tagged before). Second, the dev pretty much reveals himsel to be a member of the corp in question. And there is the simple fact he violates the forum rules, not that it doesn't happen in that forum, just not usually with a dev tag. Minor in the grand scheme of things - almost entertaining - but it certainly made me roll my eyes. Just goes to show you that training your folks in conflicts of interest is important stuff.
Looks like they cleaned that mess up pretty quick:
CCP Falcon wrote: Thread moderated.
This has been taken care of internally, and is no longer an issue. There'll be no further posts in this thread from anyone there shouldn't be.
Have fun, good luck with the recruitment.
Of course, being dev moderated still leaves a blue tag on the thread itself, but at least it looks less like an endorsement. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
463
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 23:42:00 -
[1267] - Quote
Maybe now they will wake up and see where the slipperly slope of allowing ****** conflicts of interest can lead you.
And lol at 5 dollar plex packs. Karma's a *****. |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
286
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 00:35:00 -
[1268] - Quote
Btw guys Katarina Reid's GTC sales are on fire!
Lord Valian wrote:You should be receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions any day now for your service to the community.
Michael Joseph Jackson wrote:I Said You Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' ... LMFAO  |

Nobani
Merch Industrial Goonswarm Federation
58
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 00:53:00 -
[1269] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Btw guys Katarina Reid's GTC sales are on fire!Lord Valian wrote:You should be receiving Ishukone Watch Scorpions any day now for your service to the community. Michael Joseph Jackson wrote:I Said You Wanna Be Startin' Somethin' ... LMFAO 
On the other hand a Nyx lottery has just been locked https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3789020#post3789020 |

Zenst
Tsunami Cartel Gank for Profit
65
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 04:20:00 -
[1270] - Quote
In the lifetime of EVE I'd say BIG and indeed the people behind EVEMON have done more than this so called lottery people SOMNER!
Does somewhat smell and perish the thought eve did a vote asking the players how to reward them for something they did not ask to be rewarded for!
I do know though that I see a **** load of spam in local about this BLINK crud and frankly reading CCP sucking up to them is just a lament too far and with that - bad CCP. |
|

The Legendary Soldier
A New Beginning
267
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 11:11:00 -
[1271] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Falcon wrote: Thread moderated.
This has been taken care of internally, and is no longer an issue. There'll be no further posts in this thread from anyone there shouldn't be.
Have fun, good luck with the recruitment.
Of course, being dev moderated still leaves a blue tag on the thread itself, but at least it looks less like an endorsement.
They can find the time to moderate a thread late at night on a Sunday, but in more than a week, they cannot find time to update this thread. ^^
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
4
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 14:10:00 -
[1272] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:CCP Falcon wrote: Thread moderated.
This has been taken care of internally, and is no longer an issue. There'll be no further posts in this thread from anyone there shouldn't be.
Have fun, good luck with the recruitment.
Of course, being dev moderated still leaves a blue tag on the thread itself, but at least it looks less like an endorsement. They can find the time to moderate a thread late at night on a Sunday, but in more than a week, they cannot find time to update this thread. ^^
Can't blame them for doing simple forum maintenance, simply because the matter at hand only gets decided by the top dogs, not some dev. And we all know how useless Hilmar is.
|

Katarina Reid
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
322
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 16:57:00 -
[1273] - Quote
Come and help me buy some pizza and coke |

Kate stark
762
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 18:18:00 -
[1274] - Quote
what toppings on the pizza? i've made my feelings clear already in this thread about what should and shouldn't be on a pizza. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Katarina Reid
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
322
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 18:25:00 -
[1275] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:what toppings on the pizza? i've made my feelings clear already in this thread about what should and shouldn't be on a pizza. Seeing as eve players will be paying its there choice. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
144
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 19:18:00 -
[1276] - Quote
Sooooo... how are those surveys coming?
CSM?
CCP?
Bueller? Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Money Makin Mitch
Paid in Full
204
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 19:34:00 -
[1277] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Sooooo... how are those surveys coming?
CSM?
CCP?
Bueller? they're going to get around to it at the winter summit... maybe  |

Kate stark
762
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 20:01:00 -
[1278] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Sooooo... how are those surveys coming?
CSM?
CCP?
Bueller? they're going to get around to it at the winter summit... maybe 
hahahaha, oh god. hahahahaha. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
144
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 20:12:00 -
[1279] - Quote
Money Makin Mitch wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Sooooo... how are those surveys coming?
CSM?
CCP?
Bueller? they're going to get around to it at the winter summit... maybe 
Then I wonder how many of us will still be here to take it...
Of course I assume that's the plan: drag this out so long that anyone actually interested in the outcome gives up and leaves, so that any sort of customer survey appears favorable to CCP. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Kate stark
763
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 20:30:00 -
[1280] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Sooooo... how are those surveys coming?
CSM?
CCP?
Bueller? they're going to get around to it at the winter summit... maybe  Then I wonder how many of us will still be here to take it... Of course I assume that's the plan: drag this out so long that anyone actually interested in the outcome gives up and leaves, so that any sort of customer survey appears favorable to CCP.
if that is their plan, then i think it's working. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Shai 'Hulud
168
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 20:47:00 -
[1281] - Quote
wrote:Until this matter is resolved internally and a statement is prepared and released, the decision has been made to disallow any new transactions of this nature. It is against the rules to quote petition replies, so that's not what this quote is. I had my friend read it to me, and I am quoting him. He doesn't play EVE so he will be left nameless.
See what I did there? All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Frying Doom
2874
|
Posted - 2013.10.28 21:06:00 -
[1282] - Quote
Good to see CCP is doing everything in its power to protect Somer Blink.
Shame the game has no meaning now, after all why earn isk ingame when you can just buy it for bugger all.
As I said before if 1 in 10 members of TEST had bought GTC from Somer and donated it to TEST, the goons would have lost. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
508
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 05:03:00 -
[1283] - Quote
Shai 'Hulud wrote: wrote:Until this matter is resolved internally and a statement is prepared and released, the decision has been made to disallow any new transactions of this nature. It is against the rules to quote petition replies, so that's not what this quote is. I had my friend read it to me, and I am quoting him. He doesn't play EVE so he will be left nameless. See what I did there?
The cut of your jib.
I likes it. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 08:57:00 -
[1284] - Quote
But Somer transactions are allowed? |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2531
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 10:55:00 -
[1285] - Quote
Somer is RMT and CCP explicitly allow it.
End of story.
End of subscription. |

Anomaly One
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 12:11:00 -
[1286] - Quote
ye it's over.. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
2
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 12:35:00 -
[1287] - Quote
Somer is RMTing with special privileges, has been given hundreds of billions in rare ships, and receives constant CCP endorsement.
And CCP is taking the 'totally ignore all the complaints' approach.
lol.
|

Frying Doom
2886
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 12:43:00 -
[1288] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Somer is RMTing with special privileges, has been given hundreds of billions in rare ships, and receives constant CCP endorsement.
And CCP is taking the 'totally ignore all the complaints' approach.
lol.
Well at least they are consistent. Any spelling and grammatical errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:04:00 -
[1289] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Somer is RMTing with special privileges, has been given hundreds of billions in rare ships, and receives constant CCP endorsement.
And CCP is taking the 'totally ignore all the complaints' approach.
lol.
don't forget that they got the first set of the new monocles before anyone else did, back when they were worth like 20b each.
everyone keeps forgetting that part lol. |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:04:00 -
[1290] - Quote
Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit.
Here's a hint: Eve is like reality in one aspect. That being, that life isn't fair. People have advantages over other people. That's called life. Instead of throwing your rattler out of your crib and crying until CCP gives it back to you, why not just do exactly what everyone else has done? You want something? Work for it. Somer, I'm sure, started with nothing just as I did, and figured out a fair business model that worked. It worked so well, that there are nearly 64 pages of people whinging about it now.
Do you whinge like that when you PVP? Do you whinge like that when you get podded? No?
THEN WHY ARE YOU DOING SO NOW?
I started in this game with nothing. I have worked my way up over the last nearly 3 years, and I have an alliance that I run, a corp I head, capitals I make, and a nicely positive wallet. Quit bitching, and get back to work.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |
|

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:10:00 -
[1291] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Here's a hint: Eve is like reality in one aspect. That being, that life isn't fair. People have advantages over other people. That's called life. Instead of throwing your rattler out of your crib and crying until CCP gives it back to you, why not just do exactly what everyone else has done? You want something? Work for it. Somer, I'm sure, started with nothing just as I did, and figured out a fair business model that worked. It worked so well, that there are nearly 64 pages of people whinging about it now. Do you whinge like that when you PVP? Do you whinge like that when you get podded? No? THEN WHY ARE YOU DOING SO NOW? I started in this game with nothing. I have worked my way up over the last nearly 3 years, and I have an alliance that I run, a corp I head, capitals I make, and a nicely positive wallet. Quit bitching, and get back to work. doesn't bother you at all that while you did all that hard work, the devs just secretly spawned out the equiv. of 30 supercarrier hulls at the time to gift to one corp behind everyone else's back? 
doesn't bother you at all that while you would get banned at the slightest hint of RMT, that very same corp that got free ships was allowed to RMT for years, was endorsed by the devs, and had their competition locked out for doing the same exact thing?  |

Shai 'Hulud
173
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:30:00 -
[1292] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Here's a hint: Eve is like reality in one aspect. That being, that life isn't fair. People have advantages over other people. That's called life. Instead of throwing your rattler out of your crib and crying until CCP gives it back to you, why not just do exactly what everyone else has done? You want something? Work for it. Somer, I'm sure, started with nothing just as I did, and figured out a fair business model that worked. It worked so well, that there are nearly 64 pages of people whinging about it now. Do you whinge like that when you PVP? Do you whinge like that when you get podded? No? THEN WHY ARE YOU DOING SO NOW? I started in this game with nothing. I have worked my way up over the last nearly 3 years, and I have an alliance that I run, a corp I head, capitals I make, and a nicely positive wallet. Quit bitching, and get back to work. Everyone has their limits... their "lines in the sand." If you don't, you're just a sheep.
And if you don't stand up when such lines are crossed, you're worse: a coward. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Frying Doom
2892
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:30:00 -
[1293] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Go throw your Video card in your oven.
No why not whingers stopped your video card melting. How about getting killed by gold ammo? no whingers stopped that too. More has been achieved in this game by whinning and unsubbing than anything else.
So before you start complaining just remember, the only reason any of your capitals or your wallet are worth anything at all are those people that have whinned and unsubbed. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
13
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:33:00 -
[1294] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Go throw your Video card in your oven. No why not whingers stopped your video card melting. How about getting killed by gold ammo? no whingers stopped that too. More has been achieved in this game by whinning and unsubbing than anything else. So before you start complaining just remember, the only reason any of your capitals or your wallet are worth anything at all are those people that have whinned and unsubbed. he seems to be content slaving away to build a carrier at a time while the devs spawn entire supercapital fleets for others  |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2764
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:34:00 -
[1295] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Here's a hint: Eve is like reality in one aspect. That being, that life isn't fair. People have advantages over other people. That's called life. Instead of throwing your rattler out of your crib and crying until CCP gives it back to you, why not just do exactly what everyone else has done? You want something? Work for it. Somer, I'm sure, started with nothing just as I did, and figured out a fair business model that worked. It worked so well, that there are nearly 64 pages of people whinging about it now. Do you whinge like that when you PVP? Do you whinge like that when you get podded? No? THEN WHY ARE YOU DOING SO NOW? I started in this game with nothing. I have worked my way up over the last nearly 3 years, and I have an alliance that I run, a corp I head, capitals I make, and a nicely positive wallet. Quit bitching, and get back to work. Does this have an effect on me directly, given my non-alliance-type playstyle? Nope. Not a bit. ...but there is a type of player in EvE that serves as the foundation of everything that happens in this game. Like him or hate him, alliance heads like mittens drive the game. They really do. Regardless of how you play, it is the big corporations and alliances that drive the market, that move huge groups of players across the map, that consume vast quantities of finished products, and that destroy huge numbers of ships. It is they who are screwed if an opposing faction all of a sudden gets half a tril injected into their war chest. Imagine if TEST got an extra half tril when they were getting pounded in Fountain. Think it would have changed TEST's decisions? I bet it would. So why play that game? There's no point... because the strategy part is rendered almost moot.
If the alliance heads walked away, EvE would become almost all grind. The markets would collapse. People would stop building smack b/c there'd be no profit in it. EvE would just be boring.
What I've noticed in life is that people who say "life isn't fair" tend to be people who make a lot of excuses and fail to achieve their goals. If people could do what SOMER did, that would be fine. ATM you get banned for trying.
|

Gallente Citizen 827473904528
LoGisTicAl ERr0R
7
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 15:57:00 -
[1296] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:ShadowandLight wrote:Here's the million dollar question
what else has CCP secretly given out to pilots, communities, player run organizations?
Secretly...nothing. And what we've given out as rewards or prizes doesn't generally come in big bundles which is one of the key reasons eyebrows were raised over this incident. It's worth keeping in mind that Internal Affairs has complete oversight over every single item spawned or transferred on our server and monitors all staff account activity closely as is their purpose.
Icluding the days when CCP were giving T2 blueprints out....
All this has happened before and will happen again. Slightly different scenario but CCP seem to have a thing for favouring certain groups.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2539
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 16:06:00 -
[1297] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Eve is going to be a much better place when all of the whinging people do quit. Here's a hint: Eve is like reality in one aspect. That being, that life isn't fair. People have advantages over other people. That's called life. Instead of throwing your rattler out of your crib and crying until CCP gives it back to you, why not just do exactly what everyone else has done? You want something? Work for it. Somer, I'm sure, started with nothing just as I did, and figured out a fair business model that worked. It worked so well, that there are nearly 64 pages of people whinging about it now. Do you whinge like that when you PVP? Do you whinge like that when you get podded? No? THEN WHY ARE YOU DOING SO NOW? I started in this game with nothing. I have worked my way up over the last nearly 3 years, and I have an alliance that I run, a corp I head, capitals I make, and a nicely positive wallet. Quit bitching, and get back to work.
EVE is not like reality: EVE is manufactured and designed by people, ostensibly to provide a level playing field for people to mess about with.
Comparing what has happened here to losing a ship in a fight is moronic. It's not comparable at all.
If the people trying to keep this insane crap in check all leave, then EVE wont be better. It'll be a shithole in which the developers give their pets (who the rules you must abide by don't quite apply to), extravagant gifts - while you must work for it all. You can't compete with them, because there's no way for you to. |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 16:52:00 -
[1298] - Quote
Gogela wrote:What I've noticed in life is that people who say "life isn't fair" tend to be people who make a lot of excuses and fail to achieve their goals. If people could do what SOMER did, that would be fine. ATM you get banned for trying.
Rather just the opposite. I say life isn't fair because that's a reality. Sometimes the journey of a thousand miles DOES end very very badly. The point however, is not to give up. Yes, the game is rigged, fixed, unfair. Whatever. It's the journey that matters, not the destination. Much like the World of Darkness (a game I have played for more than 10 years), the value is in the struggle - there is no "win" condition.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 16:59:00 -
[1299] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I cannot comprehend how you defend this - you *work* for your goals, building capitals etc, while a competing organisation is not only gifted 30 super capital hulls, but also officially endorsed and promoted.
It's not a defense, so much as it's a VERY different way of looking at it than I think most here do. Markets are self sorting. Yes, artificial controls can exist, but in general the market will take care of itself. The same is true here.
If people don't like what CCP does, they can (and I'll bet do) play other games. These are substitute goods for Eve itself. If the perception is that Eve has lost some utility in terms of value, then other goods become more attractive. People then opt to go play Star Wars, World of Tanks, WoW, or whatever. Good on them. I hope they enjoy it. I like Eve, and this tempest in a tea pot is nothing more than a distraction. Don't like it? Vote with your feet.
And remember: When a player leaves Eve for WoW, the IQ of both communities goes up. ;-)
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:01:00 -
[1300] - Quote
Gallente Citizen 827473904528 wrote:All this has happened before and will happen again. Slightly different scenario but CCP seem to have a thing for favouring certain groups.
I have no problem at all with this. Life is like that. Compete and enjoy the game, or don't. I do. My opinion simply differs from that of the majority of you, even the moron who wants to wardec me for daring to have an opinion.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |
|

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:09:00 -
[1301] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:but you might wanna watch your recruitment for the next couple months, because now i may be putting a couple of awoxer toons in for when the time is just right 
Come at me, Bro. 
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:10:00 -
[1302] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Ace Boogi wrote:but you might wanna watch your recruitment for the next couple months, because now i may be putting a couple of awoxer toons in for when the time is just right  Come at me, Bro.  i assume you have a rorqual or two to aid you in your carrier construction endeavors. might wanna make sure you watch them carefully  |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:13:00 -
[1303] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:i assume you have a rorqual or two to aid you in your carrier construction endeavors. might wanna make sure you watch them carefully 
Well, you know what they say about assumptions. 
Anyway, If you're done waving your E-Peen, I'm in favor of anything that generates good game content.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
32
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:16:00 -
[1304] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Ace Boogi wrote:i assume you have a rorqual or two to aid you in your carrier construction endeavors. might wanna make sure you watch them carefully  Well, you know what they say about assumptions.  Anyway, If you're done waving your E-Peen, I'm in favor of anything that generates good game content. i agree, any and all content is welcome.
i am happy that you took it sportingly instead of with tears.
and tbh i (probably) won't actually do it, because i'm too damn lazy to undock  |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:19:00 -
[1305] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:Slappy Andven wrote:Ace Boogi wrote:i assume you have a rorqual or two to aid you in your carrier construction endeavors. might wanna make sure you watch them carefully  Well, you know what they say about assumptions.  Anyway, If you're done waving your E-Peen, I'm in favor of anything that generates good game content. me too, and yes, i'm actually too lazy to do any of that ****  so i (probably) won't. but i am happy that you took it sportingly instead of with tears.
See? That right there is one of the things I absolutely love about this game. It shouldn't matter who blows up who, it's all fun. In my day job, I'm stuck behind a desk doing Unix system administration all day. I love my job, but it can be pretty damn boring. Eve is anything at all but boring. 
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
291
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 17:51:00 -
[1306] - Quote
Unsubbed all my 172 alts. Came in looking for a good space sci-fi mmorpg, left when I saw it was a good pile of $hit  |

Kate stark
767
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 18:26:00 -
[1307] - Quote
i like poetic's alternative form of protest: just blatantly RMT all your isk in to cash and **** the consequences. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
151
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 18:27:00 -
[1308] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:Unsubbed all my 172 alts. Came in looking for a good space sci-fi mmorpg, left when I saw it was a good pile of $hit 
You unsubbed us all? I guess this thread will be pretty quiet from here on out... 
On a more serious note, I'm surprised this hasn't been linked in this thread yet:
Katarina Reid wrote:Headshot Not sure if im allowed to link the letter given to resellers but it says to stop players trading ingame items for cash. ETC + bonus items may not be direclty or indirectly traded by the buyer for isk. EULA says cant sell ingame stuff for cash. 10 days for reseller to stop it or else. You can still support me for no reward when you buy your ETC's here$660 made for me 377 sale of ETC's $13,195 for CCP 188b given out
So, when is SOMER getting its bonus ISK practice shut down? Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Careby
Careby Exploration
62
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 19:32:00 -
[1309] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Katarina Reid wrote:...stop it or else.... So, when is SOMER getting its bonus ISK practice shut down? Any rule has to be applied equally, right... I'm guessing "or else" |

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
292
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 20:57:00 -
[1310] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Katarina Reid wrote:Headshot Not sure if im allowed to link the letter given to resellers but it says to let Katrina give bonus isk with referrals until she cleans her wallet within 10 days, this way we can keep profiting from this fast GTC sales buck and then continue with Somer Blink RMT breaching the EULA alone. You can still support me for no reward when you buy your ETC's here$660 made for me 377 sale of ETC's $13,195 for CCP 188b given out
Letter translated to english  |
|

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
43
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 21:06:00 -
[1311] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:
So, when is SOMER getting its bonus ISK practice shut down? Any rule has to be applied equally, right? Or are they still hiding behind the "it's not really ISK" defense?
go sit in their in-game channel, even now, their staff is directing people to their affiliate link for the bonus credit.
they seriously have no ******* scruples. |

Frying Doom
2921
|
Posted - 2013.10.29 23:22:00 -
[1312] - Quote
The more I look at this the more I believe CCP did not actually research Somer Blink before endorsing them.
If a member of CCP has claimed that they did research Somer Blink, they are either incompetent or receiving bribes.
I can not even believe for a second that CEO CCP 'Greed is Good' Hilmar, failed in risk management so badly when presented with the facts.
What are the facts?
- Somer has made CCP Millions in GTC sales
- To sign up for a Somer Blink account you must use the in game browser.
- CCP convert the GTC into isk which is then sent in-game to Somer Blink.
- Under UK law this gambling is illegal as you can cash out for plex and subsequently receive a service, this game.
- Somer Blinks site is registered in Panama.
- In a court of law, it would be nearly impossible to actually prove who owns Somer Blink.
- Gambling sites hosted 'Off shore' are hardly reputable businesses, that is why they are 'off shore'.
That is why I cannot believe anyone at CCP actually looked at this beyond, how much money they were getting from Somer Blink.
No CEO would look at a Gambling site hosted in Panama and consider them a good risk to have so deeply in-bedded into their company.
CCP has broken its own TOS for the sake of this business and frankly for what? A few million dollars, after they have spent so much more building this game. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2775
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 05:22:00 -
[1313] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Gogela wrote:What I've noticed in life is that people who say "life isn't fair" tend to be people who make a lot of excuses and fail to achieve their goals. If people could do what SOMER did, that would be fine. ATM you get banned for trying. Rather just the opposite. I say life isn't fair because that's a reality. Sometimes the journey of a thousand miles DOES end very very badly. The point however, is not to give up. Yes, the game is rigged, fixed, unfair. Whatever. It's the journey that matters, not the destination. Much like the World of Darkness (a game I have played for more than 10 years), the value is in the struggle - there is no "win" condition. The rules of Earth are the same for everyone. You are born. You learn some s*** (or don't), you make use of it as best you can, and you die. Those are the basic rules of the life game. All the smack that happens on earth falls under that rule set. The gods never step in. It's all between us humans. That would be the metaphor to compare CCP assistance to. They are the gods/makers of EvE, and they shouldn't interfere. The journey matters when you want to make the most of your personal life, sure. For those who would conquer, it's the end state. If you want to talk about EvE as a whole, it is the conquerors that require a fight sans interference from Poseidon. That would be my opinion on the matter at hand...
|

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
181
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:41:00 -
[1314] - Quote
nobody gives a **** what the reward was you ignorant fools, the issue people have is that after 7 years of handing out permanent bans for anybody who sold isk, you have no perfected isk selling for yourselves and are rewarding people who boost your sales!!
Somer is a huge isk sink, people buy plex to pay for their tickets, and you are happy with that. I don't blame you from a business angle, but the way you go about it is ridiculous. |

Nova Satar
Rekall Incorporated Sinewave Alliance
181
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 11:44:00 -
[1315] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:
Why hasnGÇÖt my favorite fansite or community enterprise received something nice too?
Because they don't generate PLEX sales.
fixed it for you. |

Kestler Jagrafess
The Guardian Knights Lost Obsession
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 12:50:00 -
[1316] - Quote
Alright I'm not sure how many times my points have been hit on but bare with me. I'm not reading all 64 pages of responses.
So far I've seen a lot of people bashing SB for "stealing isk." They don't steal it. They operate the same way any form of gambling operates. Someone doesn't have a lot of something and they want more. Take a chance bet what you have and you either come out on top or you lose everything. That's gambling. Personally I've thrown so much into SB and I lose it all every time, but I still play 'cause maybe someday I'll make up for what I've lost and even if I don't it's fun to me.
That being said; There are several bashing SB for being a promoter for ETC's and putting money in CCP's wallet. Last time I checked CCP uses that money (and all the other money they make) to host all kinds of events for their players, and continue to add content to the game we all love. If you don't love EVE, your frozen corpse should be turned into a tourist attraction in Jita. On top of actually helping to fund CCP with their promotion system, SB also donates portions of their earnings to player events in game. Example: funding every tournament team with 10 bil. Maybe everyone else in EVE just has 10b to throw around on a tournament or whatever. If you're one of those with too much to figure what to do with it, donate some to me. I'll gladly accept it. Maybe these guys are stuffing their wallets with isk, but some of it goes back to the players to make the game more interesting.
Now, SB aside. I've seen a lot of posts that run something along the lines of: Bound items suck. Vanity trash is cool. Out of game stuff is fine too. Just don't give anything to [so&so]
The IWS IS "vanity trash" its a non functional "cool looking," for those of you who don't understand what skinned means, ship. It's entire existence is devoted to being given out as a prize for whatever CCP wants. If you don't like what they sell for don't buy one. If you're holding onto it to sell it for major gains, sell it now. CCP staff have already hit this one enough. I don't even know why it's so hard to comprehend. It's worthless. They're giving out more. Maybe they'll do something else about how they give it out, but there will be more. Maybe they should just give one out to every account on Christmas or around the holidays. Then no one gets to cry that they don't have one or they cost too much or too little.
I agree with those that say bound items suck. Out of game stuff is cool too, but that's CCP putting real money towards giving more players more stuff. They already give out plenty and have stated more than once that sometimes they'll throw out a t-shirt or resin ships. Personally I like the idea of maybe someday getting something for not trying to blow up every ship I see, or however I'm supposed to support the community. In game they can create the "vanity trash." It's something cool to have, and once it's created they can give out as many as they want.
The only real problem I see is transparency. I would like to know who CCP is giving things to. Not only does it say "Hey, we're not playing favorites with [so&so]" but it also throws them out on the metaphoric D-scan. I'm all for checking out new fansites, or maybe finding a new tool to use with EVE, and I feel like that would be a great way to showcase those. I know we've already got the community spotlight, but I feel that this could add to that.
Long story short, keep doing what you're doing CCP. You didn't get this far with an awesome fanbase for no reason, and we're not going anywhere any time soon. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2554
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 14:38:00 -
[1317] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote:Alright I'm not sure how many times my points have been hit on but bare with me. I'm not reading all 64 pages of responses.
So far I've seen a lot of people bashing SB for "stealing isk." They don't steal it. They operate the same way any form of gambling operates. Someone doesn't have a lot of something and they want more. Take a chance bet what you have and you either come out on top or you lose everything. That's gambling. Personally I've thrown so much into SB and I lose it all every time, but I still play 'cause maybe someday I'll make up for what I've lost and even if I don't it's fun to me.
That being said; There are several bashing SB for being a promoter for ETC's and putting money in CCP's wallet. Last time I checked CCP uses that money (and all the other money they make) to host all kinds of events for their players, and continue to add content to the game we all love. If you don't love EVE, your frozen corpse should be turned into a tourist attraction in Jita. On top of actually helping to fund CCP with their promotion system, SB also donates portions of their earnings to player events in game. Example: funding every tournament team with 10 bil. Maybe everyone else in EVE just has 10b to throw around on a tournament or whatever. If you're one of those with too much to figure what to do with it, donate some to me. I'll gladly accept it. Maybe these guys are stuffing their wallets with isk, but some of it goes back to the players to make the game more interesting.
Now, SB aside. I've seen a lot of posts that run something along the lines of: Bound items suck. Vanity trash is cool. Out of game stuff is fine too. Just don't give anything to [so&so]
The IWS IS "vanity trash" its a non functional "cool looking," for those of you who don't understand what skinned means, ship. It's entire existence is devoted to being given out as a prize for whatever CCP wants. If you don't like what they sell for don't buy one. If you're holding onto it to sell it for major gains, sell it now. CCP staff have already hit this one enough. I don't even know why it's so hard to comprehend. It's worthless. They're giving out more. Maybe they'll do something else about how they give it out, but there will be more. Maybe they should just give one out to every account on Christmas or around the holidays. Then no one gets to cry that they don't have one or they cost too much or too little.
I agree with those that say bound items suck. Out of game stuff is cool too, but that's CCP putting real money towards giving more players more stuff. They already give out plenty and have stated more than once that sometimes they'll throw out a t-shirt or resin ships. Personally I like the idea of maybe someday getting something for not trying to blow up every ship I see, or however I'm supposed to support the community. In game they can create the "vanity trash." It's something cool to have, and once it's created they can give out as many as they want.
The only real problem I see is transparency. I would like to know who CCP is giving things to. Not only does it say "Hey, we're not playing favorites with [so&so]" but it also throws them out on the metaphoric D-scan. I'm all for checking out new fansites, or maybe finding a new tool to use with EVE, and I feel like that would be a great way to showcase those. I know we've already got the community spotlight, but I feel that this could add to that.
Long story short, keep doing what you're doing CCP. You didn't get this far with an awesome fanbase for no reason, and we're not going anywhere any time soon.
Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
296
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:32:00 -
[1318] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote: Long story short, I'm a CCP/Somer shill posting desperate damage control attempts. Next I'm gonna hire a youtube girl to make a video on it. I realised how far I have messed the game up beyond repair as all the the players are unsubbing and cashing out their isk before they leave.
Fixed that for you  |

Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
9
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 16:47:00 -
[1319] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote:I'm a clueless fanboy
Should have just posted that, would have saved you a lot of typing tbh.
|

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 17:25:00 -
[1320] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
i guess a nyx only refines to 1 trit bro  |
|

RAW23
384
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 17:36:00 -
[1321] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote: Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
Here is a Somer employee selling their 'vanity trash' for nearly 20 billion isk 9 days after CCP gifted them.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273452
The IWS might be vanity trash but it is exceedingly valuable vanity trash and CCP's gifts were worth c. 600 billion at market value. There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Kate stark
770
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 19:17:00 -
[1322] - Quote
RAW23 wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote: Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
Here is a Somer employee selling their 'vanity trash' for nearly 20 billion isk 9 days after CCP gifted them. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273452The IWS might be vanity trash but it is exceedingly valuable vanity trash and CCP's gifts were worth c. 600 billion at market value.
imagine the outcry if goons were just gifted 600bn isk from thin air. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
486
|
Posted - 2013.10.30 20:55:00 -
[1323] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:RAW23 wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote: Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
Here is a Somer employee selling their 'vanity trash' for nearly 20 billion isk 9 days after CCP gifted them. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273452The IWS might be vanity trash but it is exceedingly valuable vanity trash and CCP's gifts were worth c. 600 billion at market value. imagine the outcry if goons were just gifted 600bn isk from thin air.
Goons have created more content and enjoyment for me than SOMERblink ever will.
They can have a few ishy scorps as far as I am concerned.
Better yet - give the scorps to Test Alliance, they've given me even more hours of enjoyment than the Goons and lord knows they need the help right now.
|

raven666wings
Cyber Chaos Crew
303
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 05:08:00 -
[1324] - Quote
DNSBlack's thread got locked with a derp post:
CCP Eterne wrote:I am locking this as trading any in-game goods in exchange for ISK, even through ETC reselling or the like. ??? Lol
English translation : I am locking this as only Somer Blink can RMT. |

Kate stark
777
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 06:22:00 -
[1325] - Quote
raven666wings wrote:DNSBlack's thread got locked with a derp post:CCP Eterne wrote:I am locking this as trading any in-game goods in exchange for ISK, even through ETC reselling or the like. ??? Lol English translation : I am locking this as only Somer Blink can RMT.
alternatively "i'm locking this thread because i don't know what's going on and i can't find 2 irrelevant threads to redirect you to".
nothing against CCP eterne but his reasons for locking threads related to this whole debacle have had the most hilarious and obscure reasons i've ever seen in all of my years of shitposting on forums. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kestler Jagrafess
The Guardian Knights Lost Obsession
0
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 07:32:00 -
[1326] - Quote
For those of you who think I'm a Somer alt or a shill.. get burnt. I honestly couldn't care less if they get shut down tomorrow. The big picture is everyone wants to cry about them getting stuff. CCP gave them something that was meant to be given away. If you're dumb enough to pay the price of a supercap for something they've said there will be more of that's your problem. Market value in this game is decided by the players. If something is stupid expensive it's because someone will pay that, not because it's worth it. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2571
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 09:26:00 -
[1327] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote:For those of you who think I'm a Somer alt or a shill.. get burnt. I honestly couldn't care less if they get shut down tomorrow. The big picture is everyone wants to cry about them getting stuff. CCP gave them something that was meant to be given away. If you're dumb enough to pay the price of a supercap for something they've said there will be more of that's your problem. Market value in this game is decided by the players. If something is stupid expensive it's because someone will pay that, not because it's worth it.
It's funny you should call other people "dumb" when you're the one who appears incapable of understanding why this is an issue. Stating "the big picture is everyone wants to cry about them getting stuff" is either laughably wrong or you're deliberately constructing a strawman to attack.
That is not the big picture, that's not why people are bothered.
Learn some basic reading comprehension and understand the arguments before ranting against things no one is saying. |

Shai 'Hulud
176
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 10:51:00 -
[1328] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote:For those of you who think I'm a Somer alt or a shill.. get burnt. I honestly couldn't care less if they get shut down tomorrow. The big picture is everyone wants to cry about them getting stuff. CCP gave them something that was meant to be given away. If you're dumb enough to pay the price of a supercap for something they've said there will be more of that's your problem. Market value in this game is decided by the players. If something is stupid expensive it's because someone will pay that, not because it's worth it.
RAW23 wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote: Long story short: somer alt / shill.
The IWS is not "vanity trash" because it is worth the price of a supercap as a result of it's rarity/special nature. It doesn't have to *do* something to be worth a lot. A gold nugget doesn't *do* much but it's still worth a chunk of money.
Here is a Somer employee selling their 'vanity trash' for nearly 20 billion isk 9 days after CCP gifted them. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273452The IWS might be vanity trash but it is exceedingly valuable vanity trash and CCP's gifts were worth c. 600 billion at market value. If we are going to talk specific values, let's get it right...
SOMER was gifted up to 5 trillion ISK, in total (that we know of). All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Kate stark
780
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 19:12:00 -
[1329] - Quote
Kestler Jagrafess wrote:For those of you who think I'm a Somer alt or a shill.. get burnt. I honestly couldn't care less if they get shut down tomorrow. The big picture is everyone wants to cry about them getting stuff. CCP gave them something that was meant to be given away. If you're dumb enough to pay the price of a supercap for something they've said there will be more of that's your problem. Market value in this game is decided by the players. If something is stupid expensive it's because someone will pay that, not because it's worth it.
actually no, the issue is that ccp are handing out large amounts of high value assets spawned from thin air to select groups of players without any form of control other than "we think it's cool". does it really need to be explained why producing high value assets out of thin air is a bad idea (before we even get on to the lack of governing criteria)? it was simply a dumb, reckless, and irresponsible way to reward somer.
also if it's expensive because some one will pay it, then it is worth it... that's pretty much how it's defined. an items i only ever worth as much as some one is willing to pay for it. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 20:47:00 -
[1330] - Quote
@ CCP
What action have you planned to resolve our concerns?
Alternatively when can we expect a statement? |
|

Frying Doom
2974
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:00:00 -
[1331] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Alternatively when can we expect a statement? Example on-line Survey
1. How would you like us to tell you we will never issue a statement.
a) I am sorry what concerns? b) We will tell you when hell freezes over. c) We aint telling you squat, it is out game not yours. d) Please Submit a petition so we can promptly tell you to get bent and then ban you if you share that with anyone else. e) Have you considered buying GTC via Somer Blink, this may help to relieve your frustrations. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
276
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 22:23:00 -
[1332] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: b) We will tell you when hell freezes over.
Funnily enough, that was exactly what I was thinking. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 03:42:00 -
[1333] - Quote
[03:37:23] Firebat2 > according to http://evenews24.com/2013/10/29/somer-blinks-bonus-gets-closed-down/ we can no longer get bonus isk. yet the blink site is still advertising it, what gives?
[03:38:19] Sara Utama > so they are upping the ante for those 10 days.. possibly kicking the hornets nest, or possibly just paying for a ton of server time while they can
[03:38:50] Andre Ox > We spoke to CCP this morning - there's some annoying people that were trying to exploit the program some fansites (us included) used for years now, but for evil purpose. So they're changing policy, and asked us to close out the bonus after the 7th :)
[03:39:58] Andre Ox > The people who get nuked from orbit are the ones who just make up their own interpretations of things then leap into action without asking any questions. :p
(apparently Markee is sold out now)
[03:41:10] Andre Ox > Fire - They're planning to stock heavy, so they shouldn't run out again tomorrow :) ---
so they're basically thumbing their nose at the community while laughing their way to the bank |

Frying Doom
2982
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 04:14:00 -
[1334] - Quote
With Somer Blink increasing their bonus to 1 Billion isk, it just shows how much of a community based service they really are.
Every other site has closed their bonus, Somer has increased theirs to maximize their profits while they can.
They will probably up it again in a few days to squeeze every last dollar out of this community.
With behavior like this CCP might has well have done a spotlight on a loan shark.
What ever credibility CCP had is being fire saled off by Somer. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
56
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 04:27:00 -
[1335] - Quote
their customers know that the credit is isk, and that it's for them to cash out free ****. all the arguments that it isn't RMT fall flat on their face. Andrev Nox is even backdating GTC purchases and giving retroactive credit to fuel more sales. they really are acting shamelessly, because they have no fear of repercussions. |

Frying Doom
2986
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 05:09:00 -
[1336] - Quote
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive" --Sir Walter Scott Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
57
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 05:16:00 -
[1337] - Quote
[05:10:35] augie bendoggy > i know there has been alot of "grey area " discussion.. but really.. if it makes people buy more plexs from ccp.. what do they have to complain about
[05:11:44] Andrev Nox > Augie - it wasn't ever a grey area. Years ago, when we started it, we got CCP's blessing, up and down the chain, before a single GTC was bonused :)
[05:11:46] Andrev Nox > The problem comes from a few problem children who screamed "how high" after Mittens said "jump," who were abusing the system that's been in place for dozens of sites for years. So they had to change policy to shut down the malicious players.
|

Kate stark
786
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 06:28:00 -
[1338] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:With Somer Blink increasing their bonus to 1 Billion isk, it just shows how much of a community based service they really are.
Every other site has closed their bonus, Somer has increased theirs to maximize their profits while they can.
They will probably up it again in a few days to squeeze every last dollar out of this community.
With behavior like this CCP might has well have done a spotlight on a loan shark.
What ever credibility CCP had is being fire saled off by Somer.
as if we wouldn't do any differently.
this is eve. this is also why ccp should have set up some kind of system and guidelines before going ahead with this dumb idea that has clearly just backfired spectacularly. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Frying Doom
2998
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 06:54:00 -
[1339] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Frying Doom wrote:With Somer Blink increasing their bonus to 1 Billion isk, it just shows how much of a community based service they really are.
Every other site has closed their bonus, Somer has increased theirs to maximize their profits while they can.
They will probably up it again in a few days to squeeze every last dollar out of this community.
With behavior like this CCP might has well have done a spotlight on a loan shark.
What ever credibility CCP had is being fire saled off by Somer. as if we wouldn't do any differently. this is eve. this is also why ccp should have set up some kind of system and guidelines before going ahead with this dumb idea that has clearly just backfired spectacularly. It would depend on my perspective.
If I was doing it for the cash, then hell yeah I would make as much as I can before my gravy train ran out.
If I was a community site and I had set the site up for the community and not for myself, then I would take down the bonus immediately, as I had been informed that my actions were viewed in a bad light and were hurting the community I had set the site up for in the first place.
But CCP really should have set up properly guide lines and altered the EULA so it was an equal field for all, before they allowed this in the first place. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
69
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 07:18:00 -
[1340] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: It would depend on my perspective.
If I was doing it for the cash, then hell yeah I would make as much as I can before my gravy train ran out.
If I was a community site and I had set the site up for the community and not for myself, then I would take down the bonus immediately, as I had been informed that my actions were viewed in a bad light and were hurting the community I had set the site up for in the first place.
But CCP really should have set up properly guide lines and altered the EULA so it was an equal field for all, before they allowed this in the first place.
Andrev is in there selling GTCs by the dozen it seems. he's backtracking 'credit' to people who purchased earlier and didn't get the bonus, obviously so that they'll buy even more. with 300T to cash out, they've decided to go batshit crazy with their margins, selling you 1bil ISK to made a $1.75 profit. even with such small amounts per unit, they have so much ISK they're going to make a ridiculous profit anyways. i wouldn't be surprised if they escalate this as the week goes on in a desperate effort to completely monetize their spacebux. the sad thing is the people buying those GTC really believe they're supporting a 'community website' which provides content. they'll probably be lining up to donate to Somer's paypal once the GTCs dry up. |
|

Frying Doom
3000
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 07:22:00 -
[1341] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:Frying Doom wrote: It would depend on my perspective.
If I was doing it for the cash, then hell yeah I would make as much as I can before my gravy train ran out.
If I was a community site and I had set the site up for the community and not for myself, then I would take down the bonus immediately, as I had been informed that my actions were viewed in a bad light and were hurting the community I had set the site up for in the first place.
But CCP really should have set up properly guide lines and altered the EULA so it was an equal field for all, before they allowed this in the first place.
Andrev is in there selling GTCs by the dozen it seems. he's backtracking 'credit' to people who purchased earlier and didn't get the bonus, obviously so that they'll buy even more. with 300T to cash out, they've decided to go batshit crazy with their margins, selling you 1bil ISK to made a $1.75 profit. even with such small amounts per unit, they have so much ISK they're going to make a ridiculous profit anyways. i wouldn't be surprised if they escalate this as the week goes on in a desperate effort to completely monetize their spacebux. the sad thing is the people buying those GTC really believe they're supporting a 'community website' which provides content. they'll probably be lining up to donate to Somer's paypal once the GTCs dry up. CCP really needs to step in...After they have made CCP lots of money, and close their in game accounts for being a business. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
69
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 07:24:00 -
[1342] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote: CCP really needs to step in...After they have made CCP lots of money, and close their in game accounts for being a business.
i don't think Somer would really give a **** if he was banned, just as long as he gets to cash out first. he's definitely going HAM with this isk firesale. it's a pretty big **** you to the community. |

Frying Doom
3002
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 07:39:00 -
[1343] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:Frying Doom wrote: CCP really needs to step in...After they have made CCP lots of money, and close their in game accounts for being a business.
i don't think Somer would really give a **** if he was banned, just as long as he gets to cash out first. he's definitely going HAM with this isk firesale. it's a pretty big **** you to the community. It always was a big **** you to the community.
Any gambling site where you have the ability to use cash to gamble needs to be registered and controlled.
This setup where CCP turns cash into isk and then into Blink credit and reverse into in-game items and Plex reminds me a lot of Pachinko This is a mechanical game originating in Japan and is used as both a form of recreational arcade game and much more frequently as a gambling device, filling a Japanese gambling niche comparable to that of the slot machine in Western gaming. A pachinko machine resembles a vertical pinball machine, but has no flippers and uses a large number of small balls. The player fires balls into the machine, which then cascade down through a dense forest of pins. If the balls go into certain locations, they may be captured and sequences of events may be triggered that result in more balls being released. The object of the game is to capture as many balls as possible. These balls can then be exchanged for prizes. Pachinko machines were originally strictly mechanical, but modern ones have incorporated extensive electronics, becoming similar to video slot machines.
Pachinko parlors are widespread in Japan, and they usually also feature a number of slot machines (called pachislo or pachislots); hence, these venues operate and look similar to casinos.
Modern pachinko machines are highly customizable, keeping enthusiasts continuously entertained.Directly gambling on pachinko is illegal in Japan. Balls won cannot be exchanged directly for money in the parlor. The balls are exchanged for tokens or prizes, which are then taken outside and exchanged for cash at a place nominally separate from the parlor.
--source: Wikipedia
I first heard about it in the 1980s, as it was illegal to gamble in Japan, so you changed cash for ball bearings and won or lost ball bearings. If you got a lot you would go next door to a separate business and they would exchange your ball bearings for prizes from teddy bears to sports cars. Because they were separate businesses it was not illegal.
A large number of these used to be owned by the Japanese Mob, the yakuza.
Not every day you get to have CCP and the Yakuza in the same post  Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
279
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 07:59:00 -
[1344] - Quote
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)? Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
70
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 08:03:00 -
[1345] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
i think we're going to get the official word on nov. 7th, after Somer finishes cashing out. |

Frying Doom
3003
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 08:03:00 -
[1346] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
Nothing from them other than the usual static. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
515
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 08:27:00 -
[1347] - Quote
"Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences."
You stole the quote CCP, but then at least learn to embrace it. |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
282
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 09:28:00 -
[1348] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:"Honor isn't about making the right choices. It's about dealing with the consequences."
You stole the quote CCP, but then at least learn to embrace it.
GÇ£Profit is everything. Profit is more than talent. It is more than the government. It is almost the equal of family." --Don Corleone (almost)
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2582
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 10:42:00 -
[1349] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:With Somer Blink increasing their bonus to 1 Billion isk, it just shows how much of a community based service they really are.
Every other site has closed their bonus, Somer has increased theirs to maximize their profits while they can.
They will probably up it again in a few days to squeeze every last dollar out of this community.
With behavior like this CCP might has well have done a spotlight on a loan shark.
What ever credibility CCP had is being fire saled off by Somer.
CCP to resellers: Stop them giving out bonuses as it's a form of RMT
All third parties stop offering bonuses
Somer up their bonus from 200m to 1bn, in order to maximise the amount of RMTing they can do in the remaining week
To any CCP dev reading this: Please explain to me exactly how you guys dare call them a "community service", and officially endorse them and claim they are legit and trustworthy
Lack of response will be taken as admission of lying, favouritism, and all round scummy practices |

Frying Doom
3025
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 10:45:00 -
[1350] - Quote
I think the following is a good reason why Greed is not so Good.
Ivan Boesky at Berkeley, 1986
Ivan Boesky was a big-time stock trader who hustled his way to riches betting on corporate takeovers. On May 18, 1986 at the University of California, Berkeley, he shared these lustrous pearls of wisdom with business school students:
GÇ£Greed is all right, by the way. I want you to know that. I think greed is healthy. You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.GÇ¥
Boesky clearly felt very good about himself at the time. But not for long. Several months after the address, Boesky was nabbed by the SEC when it found that his stock manipulations were often based on tips from corporate insiders which is GÇôoopsie! GÇô illegal. Mr. Greed soon found himself in possession of a nice prison cell.
--source: http://www.alternet.org/education/greed-good-top-7-most-piggish-commencement-speeches
CCPs greed has cost this company millions in lost revenue. How many times have players left over there dirty dealings and plain naked Greed?
I mean of course besides, Incarna, The Nex store, Somer Blink, Somer blink and oh Somer blink not to mention Dust 514, WoD and now we have EvE:VR all this crap instead of picking a real external project like WoD and just working on that while making EvE a better game with fixed code, new areas, now challenges and most importantly a real vision for the future like they had in the old days. Not these stupid road maps that they seem to rip up the moment they have finished for the new and improved road map. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
19
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 12:30:00 -
[1351] - Quote
CCP has accepted what Somer is doing is RMT, which is why it gave them 7 days more to do it without consequence?
Now they are giving 1b isk out with every sale,
This is simply ridiculous now. I am totally speechless.
|

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
439
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 12:38:00 -
[1352] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
i think we're going to get the official word on nov. 7th, after Somer finishes cashing out.
We thought we were going to hear at the end of the week when they all came back from Turkey...... |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
284
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 12:59:00 -
[1353] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:CCP has accepted what Somer is doing is RMT, which is why it gave them 7 days more to do it without consequence?
Now they are giving 1b isk out with every sale,
This is simply ridiculous now. I am totally speechless.
and there i was, thinking Sony were the ones we would have to keep an eye on...
...you know, not mentioning the stupidity of their DRM on mini disks - which is sort of like strangling your child at birth...
...and certainly not thinking of installing root kits on people's computers if they use your audio CDs...
I sort of didnt expect CCP to come close...
 Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
108
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:06:00 -
[1354] - Quote
Mra Rednu wrote:
We thought we were going to hear at the end of the week when they all came back from Turkey......
aside from the occasional CCP popping into the official thread to ease critical posts or lock new threads with shoddy reasoning, they've been extremely quiet the last few weeks. they did try responding to the fiasco of the free giveaways, but i don't think they've said anything about the RMT. watching this evolve from the Guardian-Vexors to the Scorpions to RMT with nothing but silence and implicit support for Somer from CCP has been highly interesting to say the least. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
1974
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 13:24:00 -
[1355] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:CCP has accepted what Somer is doing is RMT, which is why it gave them 7 days more to do it without consequence?
Now they are giving 1b isk out with every sale,
This is simply ridiculous now. I am totally speechless.
Probably because CCP didn't tell Somer. They told Markee Dragon, who they'll have a contract with, probably with terms and conditions which have limits on how quickly they can change/add terms. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9!-á I'm starting early :) Handy tools and an SDE conversion Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
476
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:08:00 -
[1356] - Quote
How about a reply to this CCP?
No one has said anything to the community about it in over a week. Not today spaghetti. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
509
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 14:12:00 -
[1357] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:How about a reply to this CCP?
No one has said anything to the community about it in over a week.
It's going on three weeks now. Seriously, you'd expect something... |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
33
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:13:00 -
[1358] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:How about a reply to this CCP?
No one has said anything to the community about it in over a week. It's going on three weeks now. Seriously, you'd expect something...
I wouldn't hold my breath... |

Kate stark
795
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:16:00 -
[1359] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Kate stark wrote:Frying Doom wrote:With Somer Blink increasing their bonus to 1 Billion isk, it just shows how much of a community based service they really are.
Every other site has closed their bonus, Somer has increased theirs to maximize their profits while they can.
They will probably up it again in a few days to squeeze every last dollar out of this community.
With behavior like this CCP might has well have done a spotlight on a loan shark.
What ever credibility CCP had is being fire saled off by Somer. as if we wouldn't do any differently. this is eve. this is also why ccp should have set up some kind of system and guidelines before going ahead with this dumb idea that has clearly just backfired spectacularly. It would depend on my perspective. If I was doing it for the cash, then hell yeah I would make as much as I can before my gravy train ran out. If I was a community site and I had set the site up for the community and not for myself, then I would take down the bonus immediately, as I had been informed that my actions were viewed in a bad light and were hurting the community I had set the site up for in the first place. But CCP really should have set up properly guide lines and altered the EULA so it was an equal field for all, before they allowed this in the first place.
at the end of the day somer are set up to make a profit (dollars or isk, i don't care how you interpret that). putting the bonus up to 1bn isk is a small pay out for the next week to potentially hook new players who will keep using your referral code even after the bonus dries up. short term pay out for potential new business. it's a prudent business decision. even as a community site you're useless if you're not turning a profit as you'll have to shut up shop and cease to be a community site at all.
i agree, this situation has been a bit back to front from the beginning. Hopefully CCP can turn it around but meh... doesn't seem likely since they seem to have abandoned the thread and are more interested in flying usb rifters around the office and composing poetry or something. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
797
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 15:17:00 -
[1360] - Quote
Mra Rednu wrote:Ace Boogi wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
i think we're going to get the official word on nov. 7th, after Somer finishes cashing out. We thought we were going to hear at the end of the week when they all came back from Turkey......
we did, the offical word was "turkey was nice, now we're off to vegas" and we haven't heard **** since. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Rekkr Nordgard
The Ardency of Faith Filthy Bastards
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 17:28:00 -
[1361] - Quote
Somer Blink: Incarna 2.0, because good PR and crisis management is just too much trouble. |

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
772
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 18:21:00 -
[1362] - Quote
Well played CCP, well played.....
I too am excited about trading playability for more lag and shiny pictures.....:( Petition for a Minimum bounty of 10 mil. Prevent useless bounties!
|

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
169
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 21:16:00 -
[1363] - Quote
Since most of the activity on this seems to have shifted threads for the time being, I made this post over there, but I'll repeat part of it here as an open invitation for anyone interested:
Kirren D'marr wrote:You hit the nail on the head here but somehow arrived at the completely wrong conclusion: SOMER Blink was "conduct[ing] business," which is clearly against the EULA. They've been running a business which has reportedly grossed well over $135,000; a business which is promoted and utilized through their in-game activities (exchange of ISK and items). How is this not a violation? What possible defense is there for this? For anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about, here is the relevant passage from the EULA: Quote:Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited. Frankly, I'm shocked that Somer et al. were not banned outright once the truth of their business came to light. Just because CCP not only permitted, but also endorsed this operation in the past does not mean that they cannot turn around now and take appropriate action. I would recommend that all players who are upset over this issue begin issuing petitions reporting Somerset Mahm and all other characters associated with this business as being in violation of the EULA. Cite the business clause, and point to the relevant articles that illustrate the business connection. If people make enough of a stink about this, then just maybe CCP will actually take action (I know it's a longshot, but at this point, it's about all I can come up with).
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Opia Munba
mss industry
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 22:06:00 -
[1364] - Quote
Why not just leave messages on the eve online tweet? They only seem to act when public image gets tarnished Eve online twitter |

Frying Doom
3112
|
Posted - 2013.11.01 22:15:00 -
[1365] - Quote
Opia Munba wrote:Why not just leave messages on the eve online tweet? They only seem to act when public image gets tarnished Eve online twitter Good to see Two Step making digs at them on Twitter.
Normal though, an ex-CSM doing more than the CSM. Reminds me of https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625&find=unread Where the CSM were to scared to say anything in-case it jeopardized their relation with CCP, I think this mess has shown what CCP think of the CSM. Their to clean up their mess, nothing more.
But where the bloody hell is internal affairs in all this EULA breaching behavior, surely that must fall right into their purpose. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
19
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 04:34:00 -
[1366] - Quote
Complaints written FRANKLY:
1) CCP spawning insane sums of ISK for players
The spawned iscorps have massive market value. Therefore CCP indirectly gave SOMER hundreds of billions in liquid ISK. This in a game where normal players have to work hard for ISK either in game (PVE and PVP activities) or out of game (using the PLEX market).
I have read that certain CCP employees believe the iscorps are essentially worthless (reprocess to 1 tritanium and are weaker than normal scorpions) and think a sound case for spawning hundreds of billions of rare ships for SOMER is "it's cool to help them out for being a community hub". This is a level of incompetence that rivals what I saw when I watched the movie Prometheus, and that is saying something by the way.
2) CCP allowing RMT from an ingame entity it has a relationship with
CCP usually cracks down hard on RMT with bans. However SOMER has been given a seven day notice period. Needless to say SOMER is capitalising on this by now selling ISK in one billion chunks. CCP is exempting SOMER from the EULA because they Skype and meet up. It beggars belief.
3) CCP is totally ignoring the community
It is pretty ignorant how we are being ignored. The case that these problems are all 'CCP side' is overwhelming, but we have barely received any acknowledgement of this. The real incompetence on display for me is how CCP has taken the 'totally ignore the main thread and lock all ancillary threads' approach.
4) The CSM is useless
I am sorry, but the CSM has done nothing to represent us. It is barely contributing to this debate and has clearly not represented any of the core complaints to CCP. |

Kate stark
799
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 08:22:00 -
[1367] - Quote
I just hope ccp don't think the issue is "resolved" by stopping incentives for gtcs, since that was never the issue to begin with. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
440
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 08:30:00 -
[1368] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:I just hope ccp don't think the issue is "resolved" by stopping incentives for gtcs, since that was never the issue to begin with.
+1 |

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
16
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:00:00 -
[1369] - Quote
Two of my accounts have now expired dual training, and the third will soon.
One of my accounts I closed went off line already - and two more will soon. This one and one other are paid for months, but those will close too when their time comes.
Still waiting for an update.
No you cant have my stuff, if I am not given a reason to resubscribe - it can rot. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
548
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:26:00 -
[1370] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:
I don't have anything against SOMER. It is just taking advantage of CCP mistakes. As I was saying all these issues are 'CCP side'. SOMER has no obligation to self police the EULA when CCP is overtly giving it permission to break it.
Hey, don't get me wrong here, I love your arguments - but I am not sure why some players are so quick to let SOMER off the hook.
Would you argue that the guy who steals your car has no obligation to not steal your car? It's the purely the police's fault? Would you then go and buy your car back from him because he offers you a better deal than the car dealership?
The reasons players get banned for violating the EULA is because they are 100% expected to be aware of it and follow its rules |
|

Kate stark
805
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 17:56:00 -
[1371] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Dark Magni wrote:
I don't have anything against SOMER. It is just taking advantage of CCP mistakes. As I was saying all these issues are 'CCP side'. SOMER has no obligation to self police the EULA when CCP is overtly giving it permission to break it.
Hey, don't get me wrong here, I love your arguments - but I am not sure why some players are so quick to let SOMER off the hook. Would you argue that the guy who steals your car has no obligation to not steal your car? It's the purely the police's fault? Would you then go and buy your car back from him because he offers you a better deal than the car dealership? The reasons players get banned for violating the EULA is because they are 100% expected to be aware of it and follow its rules
your analogy pretty much falls down on the fact that stealing a car is illegal, and nothing about what somer have done so far has broken any rules. the core issue really has nothing to do with somer at all, replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
51
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 19:29:00 -
[1372] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
i think we're going to get the official word on nov. 7th, after Somer finishes cashing out.
I doubt you're going to see an official word period.
They're doing the same thing as somer is - going quiet in the hopes that this all just blows over (what's it been now? A month overall?) |

Kate stark
808
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 20:09:00 -
[1373] - Quote
YesYes NoNoNo wrote:Ace Boogi wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:
And still no official word to the players?
Nothing in Dev Blog, nothing in EVE General Discussion?
Have I missed it, or are CCP trying to break my arrogance meter (again)?
i think we're going to get the official word on nov. 7th, after Somer finishes cashing out. I doubt you're going to see an official word period. They're doing the same thing as somer is - going quiet in the hopes that this all just blows over (what's it been now? A month overall?)
about that, yeah. this thread was made 10/10/13, the scorpions came to light almost a week before that. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.02 22:59:00 -
[1374] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Dark Magni wrote:
I don't have anything against SOMER. It is just taking advantage of CCP mistakes. As I was saying all these issues are 'CCP side'. SOMER has no obligation to self police the EULA when CCP is overtly giving it permission to break it.
Hey, don't get me wrong here, I love your arguments - but I am not sure why some players are so quick to let SOMER off the hook. Would you argue that the guy who steals your car has no obligation to not steal your car? It's the purely the police's fault? Would you then go and buy your car back from him because he offers you a better deal than the car dealership? The reasons players get banned for violating the EULA is because they are 100% expected to be aware of it and follow its rules
On reflection you do have a point.
While I still believe CCP staff are 100% responsible for this mess and incompetence, SOMER is still apprehensible for damaging EVE Online AKA breaking the EULA (the EULA is there to protect EVE Online, so if SOMER breaks it then the game is taking damage, in the case of RMT the damage is to the in game market). |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
567
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 13:17:00 -
[1375] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: your analogy pretty much falls down on the fact that stealing a car is illegal, and nothing about what somer have done so far has broken any rules. the core issue really has nothing to do with somer at all, replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains.
SOMER violated the EULA. The both participated in RMT and used EVE to run a business. They may not have been punished for it, but just because they haven't been punished doesn't obviate the violation. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
443
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 13:31:00 -
[1376] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Kate stark wrote: your analogy pretty much falls down on the fact that stealing a car is illegal, and nothing about what somer have done so far has broken any rules. the core issue really has nothing to do with somer at all, replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains.
SOMER violated the EULA. The both participated in RMT and used EVE to run a business. They may not have been punished for it, but just because they haven't been punished doesn't obviate the violation.
Agree with you, but there are 2 issues, the first one of CCP favouring ingame for profit corps with shed loads of favours which in this case happens to be Somer, in my opinion it's the biggest one in regards to CCP's behaviour. The 2nd being Somer RMT'ing like there is no tommorrow which is unrelated apart from the insistance from CCP that Somer is 100% legit..  |

Kate stark
809
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 15:31:00 -
[1377] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Kate stark wrote: your analogy pretty much falls down on the fact that stealing a car is illegal, and nothing about what somer have done so far has broken any rules. the core issue really has nothing to do with somer at all, replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains.
SOMER violated the EULA. The both participated in RMT and used EVE to run a business. They may not have been punished for it, but just because they haven't been punished doesn't obviate the violation.
The point is irrelevant as rewards for gtc has come to an end. Not that it was ever the point, to begin with. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
568
|
Posted - 2013.11.03 15:49:00 -
[1378] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Argus Sorn wrote:Kate stark wrote: your analogy pretty much falls down on the fact that stealing a car is illegal, and nothing about what somer have done so far has broken any rules. the core issue really has nothing to do with somer at all, replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains.
SOMER violated the EULA. The both participated in RMT and used EVE to run a business. They may not have been punished for it, but just because they haven't been punished doesn't obviate the violation. The point is irrelevant as rewards for gtc has come to an end. Not that it was ever the point, to begin with.
Please remember the analogy was a direct response to another post. The poster to which I was replying said SOMER had no responsibility to police itself in regards to the EULA.
The analogy was relevant in that regard.
And yes, I agree, it applies to all parties who violate the EULA, so you can replace SOMER with anyone else. Entities have a responsibility to NOT violate the EULA, whether or not CCP punishes them immediately or not. A failure to punish on the part of CCP should not be deemed as a de facto statement that is is NOT in violation. Nor should a failure to punish preclude CCP from doing so at a later date (like now). |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2587
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 09:41:00 -
[1379] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:I just hope ccp don't think the issue is "resolved" by stopping incentives for gtcs, since that was never the issue to begin with.
It's been a shitstorm of a number of different issues
allowing somer to RMT directly gifting somer hundreds of billions indirectly helping both somers in game and out of game activities/ability to compete by giving them and only them certain prizes to give away allowing a third party to dictate access to certain in game content Directly lying to the players and stating that somer are legit and have honoured literally every thing (this is unknowable) etc
|

Frying Doom
3193
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 10:14:00 -
[1380] - Quote
You missed Somer having direct access to CCP Devs via Skype Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |
|

Tina Tin Tits
Bourbon.
18
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 10:55:00 -
[1381] - Quote
And perhaps worse than ANY of it...
... rather than addressing it, trying to ignore it until it blows over, by ignoring angry players in this 68 page thread, blogs, twitter and just about everywhere else.
Unbelievable arrogance.
Our memories are not as short as you hope, CCP... |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
34
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 11:30:00 -
[1382] - Quote
The hilarious thing about this is CCP is actually, and really really overtly, just ignoring us lol.
Somerblink is still RMTing in 1b chunks btw, CCP are so kind to give them a bonus 7 days RMT time. Nobody else gets that. |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
286
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 14:49:00 -
[1383] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:The hilarious thing about this is CCP is actually, and really really overtly, just ignoring us lol.
If by hilarious you mean disgusting, then yes...
Business 101 tells you it is much easier to keep a customer than to find a new one... ^^ Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Opia Munba
mss industry
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 15:32:00 -
[1384] - Quote
Thank you for your email. I can confirm that we are in the process of shutting down incentive programs that some GTC sellers have been using to promote their wares, not least because of the controversy they have generated recently. This will be happening shortly and various sellers and their affiliates are reacting in various ways to the news, as you have noticed. ItGÇÿs unfortunate, but ultimately their own decision, taken in light of CCPGÇÿs stance going forward.
IGÇÿm sorry to hear of your departure from EVE and I hope you will consider rejoining us at some point in the future. Thank you for playing and for voicing your concerns.
I`m out 07 laters |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2591
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 17:23:00 -
[1385] - Quote
At this point I'm just shitposting until my subs run out.
The number and scale of the crappy things CCP have done recently is simply too much for me, and transforms this game into something I no longer wish to play (let alone pay for) |

Frying Doom
3214
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 21:22:00 -
[1386] - Quote
Well I can answer one of the CSMs survey questions
Q: I run a business in EvE Online milking all of the players for as much RL cash as I can get out of the suckers, should CCP reward me with in-game gifts, Cash or other awards?
A: CCP should follow its EULA and kick you into last week with the ban hammer.
P.S. Lost one CSM if found please return to the players it is meant to represent. |

Kinis Deren
The Nyan Cat Pirates Disband.
199
|
Posted - 2013.11.04 23:12:00 -
[1387] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Since most of the activity on this seems to have shifted threads for the time being, I made this post over there, but I'll repeat part of it here as an open invitation for anyone interested: Kirren D'marr wrote:You hit the nail on the head here but somehow arrived at the completely wrong conclusion: SOMER Blink was "conduct[ing] business," which is clearly against the EULA. They've been running a business which has reportedly grossed well over $135,000; a business which is promoted and utilized through their in-game activities (exchange of ISK and items). How is this not a violation? What possible defense is there for this? For anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about, here is the relevant passage from the EULA: Quote:Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited. Frankly, I'm shocked that Somer et al. were not banned outright once the truth of their business came to light. Just because CCP not only permitted, but also endorsed this operation in the past does not mean that they cannot turn around now and take appropriate action. I would recommend that all players who are upset over this issue begin issuing petitions reporting Somerset Mahm and all other characters associated with this business as being in violation of the EULA. Cite the business clause, and point to the relevant articles that illustrate the business connection. If people make enough of a stink about this, then just maybe CCP will actually take action (I know it's a longshot, but at this point, it's about all I can come up with).
Since Pandora's Box has been completely blown open, I hope that CCP will be issuing ultimatums to TMdC since that site is paying contributors with ISK in exchange for advert revenue resulting from page views. The owners/editorial team also fall into the category of EVE players running a business.
|

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
184
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 04:19:00 -
[1388] - Quote
Kinis Deren wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Since most of the activity on this seems to have shifted threads for the time being, I made this post over there, but I'll repeat part of it here as an open invitation for anyone interested: Kirren D'marr wrote:You hit the nail on the head here but somehow arrived at the completely wrong conclusion: SOMER Blink was "conduct[ing] business," which is clearly against the EULA. They've been running a business which has reportedly grossed well over $135,000; a business which is promoted and utilized through their in-game activities (exchange of ISK and items). How is this not a violation? What possible defense is there for this? For anyone who doesn't know what I'm talking about, here is the relevant passage from the EULA: Quote:Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities. Business entities and anyone who is acting for or on behalf of a business or for business purposes may not establish an Account, access the System or play EVE. Accessing the System or using the Game for commercial, business or income-seeking purposes is strictly prohibited. Frankly, I'm shocked that Somer et al. were not banned outright once the truth of their business came to light. Just because CCP not only permitted, but also endorsed this operation in the past does not mean that they cannot turn around now and take appropriate action. I would recommend that all players who are upset over this issue begin issuing petitions reporting Somerset Mahm and all other characters associated with this business as being in violation of the EULA. Cite the business clause, and point to the relevant articles that illustrate the business connection. If people make enough of a stink about this, then just maybe CCP will actually take action (I know it's a longshot, but at this point, it's about all I can come up with). Since Pandora's Box has been completely blown open, I hope that CCP will be issuing ultimatums to TMdC since that site is paying contributors with ISK in exchange for advert revenue resulting from page views. The owners/editorial team also fall into the category of EVE players running a business.
If anyone was receiving real life money in exchange for this ISK or the activities of the site, you might have a point. However, I don't believe that is the case, so you may be hard pressed to prove they fall under the same issue. I haven't looked into it, so I could be wrong, but that is my assumption. |

Kate stark
815
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 06:29:00 -
[1389] - Quote
the last update was 3 weeks ago.
What gives? either CCP simply don't give a **** and aren't doing anything, or they don't care enough to keep us informed. either way it's showing a great deal of "meh, i don't care" on ccp's part regardless of what they are or aren't doing.
is it really too much to as for a simple update three weeks since the last one? it doesn't take three weeks to knock up a completely bias survey... although it might take more than 3 weeks to wait for all the unfavourable participants to unsub i guess...
i think CCP's lack of response is irking me more than the stupidity of the initial problem at this point. |

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
289
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:02:00 -
[1390] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
i think CCP's lack of response is irking me more than the stupidity of the initial problem at this point.
^ This.
|
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
36
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 09:04:00 -
[1391] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:the last update was 3 weeks ago.
What gives? either CCP simply don't give a **** and aren't doing anything, or they don't care enough to keep us informed. either way it's showing a great deal of "meh, i don't care" on ccp's part regardless of what they are or aren't doing.
is it really too much to as for a simple update three weeks since the last one? it doesn't take three weeks to knock up a completely bias survey... although it might take more than 3 weeks to wait for all the unfavourable participants to unsub i guess...
i think CCP's lack of response is irking me more than the stupidity of the initial problem at this point.
I totally agree.
I find CCP's policy of ignoring everyone, locking all ancillary threads etc more annoying now. |

Melissa Morada
Elixa
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 10:50:00 -
[1392] - Quote
I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread... |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2594
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 11:08:00 -
[1393] - Quote
Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
What definition of "community" was he using though.
CCP seem to think somer are a "community" service, after all. |

Frying Doom
3228
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 11:31:00 -
[1394] - Quote
They are probably referring to the community, as defined by the CSM. You know the council who originally thought people were just bitching, some of which probably still do. |

corbexx
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
129
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 13:20:00 -
[1395] - Quote
Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
Unsubbed all my guys today wonder if i will get a nice mail from him |

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
58
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 15:33:00 -
[1396] - Quote
Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
I'm sure they think what they did is "to the satisfaction of the community" - giving them 10 days to cash out, and finish up RMT'ing while blatantly ignoring the community. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
184
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 16:22:00 -
[1397] - Quote
At this point, I think it is going to be very difficult for CCP to resolve this "to the satisfaction of the community," especially considering how much dissatisfaction they have generated in the past few weeks just by being completely silent on the matter. Even if they were to fix everything else today, I think the lack of communication up to now would be enough alone to alienate a good portion of the community. |

Kate stark
818
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 18:26:00 -
[1398] - Quote
I don't think this whole thing has a "solution" as in, to fix what has been done.
I think the solution here is simply to stop it happening again. CCP can't just remove 30 scorpions as they've likely been sold and it'd just be more hassle than it's worth and generally a waste of time. the RMT issue has more or less been addressed. The issue is that there's nothing to stop this from happening again and until ccp wastes our time with some surveys, that I predict will be largely irrelevant and provide very limited insight, i doubt we will get any kind of response, let alone resolution. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
513
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:51:00 -
[1399] - Quote
Surveys can be misleading to begin with, and no matter how you answer it will give the surveyor an out. For instance ,a question could be:
Q: Do you think RMT is bad?
A1: Yes A2: No A3: Maybe A4: I FOUND THE MOTHERFUCKING CHUPACABRA!
That could be the only question. No matter what, they come back and go, "The community has spoken, and apparently someone found the chupacabra."
That is why I take surveys with a grain of salt. As far as I'm concerned, the lack of a public response is what is driving this like it is, and it far more telling.
And CCP has a good point: ignore it, it starts to die off. Look at how this thread took off to begin with, and how it's still gaining pages now. It's slower. Much slower. Maybe it's because a lot of people did let their accounts lapse. Who knows? |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
188
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:23:00 -
[1400] - Quote
As part of a solution, I would be interested to see CCP answer the following questions:
1. Will any and all EVE accounts associated with the SOMER Blink corporation/website be shut down for EULA violations (engaging in RMT and/or using EVE accounts for business purposes)?
2. Will any gifts to SOMER Blink members/employees be reversed (gifted ships confiscated if still in their posession, or if not, the ISK value they were sold for removed; ISK funds received from players for the EVE Vegas lottery removed)?
3. Will Markee Dragon's EVE account be banned for using it to promote a business, and will the MD site be removed as an EVE GTC reseller?
4. Will investigations be conducted into all EVE players/organizations/websites running operations similar to SOMER Blink, and if they are also found to be in violation of the EULA, will appropriate disciplinary action be taken?
5. Will any CCP employees who are proven to have demonstrated favoritism towards SOMER Blink (or any other player/group of players), or whose dealings with such groups have been less than above board, be subject to appropriate disciplinary action? If warranted, would such action potentially include termination of employment?
6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole?
Now, I'm not expecting CCP to answer each and every one of these questions in the affirmative, nor am I demanding it. I am however interested to see just how much they are willing to do to try to correct this situation, and I think their answers to these questions (as well as whether or not their actions confirm the answers) would be very telling in that regard, one way or the other.
Basically, I am looking at thes questions as a sort of gauge of CCP to measure 1) how bad they believe this situation is, and 2) how far they are willing to go to fix it (not far enough? too far?).
If the CSM and CCP are still actually going through with the surveys they promised weeks ago, then it may be a good idea to put these sorts of questions on the survey to gauge the player's expectations of what constitutes appropriate action and resolution (I'm not saying the players' opinions would be 100% right, but it would give CCP a guide as to what players are willing to accept as a solution). |
|

The Legendary Soldier
Mining Mania
291
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:36:00 -
[1401] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:
And CCP has a good point: ignore it, it starts to die off. Look at how this thread took off to begin with, and how it's still gaining pages now. It's slower. Much slower. Maybe it's because a lot of people did let their accounts lapse. Who knows?
It is gaining pages slower, because the players are tired of wasting their breath.
However, it is being regularly checked, and 32000 views is not insignificant.
Unless you are CCP apparently... ^^
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
37
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:37:00 -
[1402] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:As part of a solution, I would be interested to see CCP answer the following questions:
1. Will any and all EVE accounts associated with the SOMER Blink corporation/website be shut down for EULA violations (engaging in RMT and/or using EVE accounts for business purposes)?
2. Will any gifts to SOMER Blink members/employees be reversed (gifted ships confiscated if still in their posession, or if not, the ISK value they were sold for removed; ISK funds received from players for the EVE Vegas lottery removed)?
3. Will Markee Dragon's EVE account be banned for using it to promote a business, and will the MD site be removed as an EVE GTC reseller?
4. Will investigations be conducted into all EVE players/organizations/websites running operations similar to SOMER Blink, and if they are also found to be in violation of the EULA, will appropriate disciplinary action be taken?
5. Will any CCP employees who are proven to have demonstrated favoritism towards SOMER Blink (or any other player/group of players), or whose dealings with such groups have been less than above board, be subject to appropriate disciplinary action? If warranted, would such action potentially include termination of employment?
6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole?
Now, I'm not expecting CCP to answer each and every one of these questions in the affirmative, nor am I demanding it. I am however interested to see just how much they are willing to do to try to correct this situation, and I think their answers to these questions (as well as whether or not their actions confirm the answers) would be very telling in that regard, one way or the other.
Basically, I am looking at thes questions as a sort of gauge of CCP to measure 1) how bad they believe this situation is, and 2) how far they are willing to go to fix it (not far enough? too far?).
If the CSM and CCP are still actually going through with the surveys they promised weeks ago, then it may be a good idea to put these sorts of questions on the survey to gauge the player's expectations of what constitutes appropriate action and resolution (I'm not saying the players' opinions would be 100% right, but it would give CCP a guide as to what players are willing to accept as a solution).
^
Unsubbed.
|

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
620
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:42:00 -
[1403] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:As part of a solution, I would be interested to see CCP answer the following questions:
1. Will any and all EVE accounts associated with the SOMER Blink corporation/website be shut down for EULA violations (engaging in RMT and/or using EVE accounts for business purposes)?
2. Will any gifts to SOMER Blink members/employees be reversed (gifted ships confiscated if still in their posession, or if not, the ISK value they were sold for removed; ISK funds received from players for the EVE Vegas lottery removed)?
3. Will Markee Dragon's EVE account be banned for using it to promote a business, and will the MD site be removed as an EVE GTC reseller?
4. Will investigations be conducted into all EVE players/organizations/websites running operations similar to SOMER Blink, and if they are also found to be in violation of the EULA, will appropriate disciplinary action be taken?
5. Will any CCP employees who are proven to have demonstrated favoritism towards SOMER Blink (or any other player/group of players), or whose dealings with such groups have been less than above board, be subject to appropriate disciplinary action? If warranted, would such action potentially include termination of employment?
6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole?
Now, I'm not expecting CCP to answer each and every one of these questions in the affirmative, nor am I demanding it. I am however interested to see just how much they are willing to do to try to correct this situation, and I think their answers to these questions (as well as whether or not their actions confirm the answers) would be very telling in that regard, one way or the other.
Basically, I am looking at thes questions as a sort of gauge of CCP to measure 1) how bad they believe this situation is, and 2) how far they are willing to go to fix it (not far enough? too far?).
If the CSM and CCP are still actually going through with the surveys they promised weeks ago, then it may be a good idea to put these sorts of questions on the survey to gauge the player's expectations of what constitutes appropriate action and resolution (I'm not saying the players' opinions would be 100% right, but it would give CCP a guide as to what players are willing to accept as a solution).
All of your questions suggest/imply solutions that are a bit over the top. Termination of employment? Are you absolutely nuts?
|

Daquaris
The Loathsome Lions
55
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:45:00 -
[1404] - Quote
Well look at this...
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3828472#post3828472
The forum sigs thread can get a response within a couple hours, but the blink threads go ignored.
BRA-VO |

Luci Ambrye
The Service Crew
18
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:49:00 -
[1405] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
Unsubbed all my guys today wonder if i will get a nice mail from him
mine goes in 17 hours and not expecting a positive outcome to all of this once ive left, final point to all those that asked, no you cant have my stuff. |

Daquaris
The Loathsome Lions
55
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:50:00 -
[1406] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:
And CCP has a good point: ignore it, it starts to die off. Look at how this thread took off to begin with, and how it's still gaining pages now. It's slower. Much slower. Maybe it's because a lot of people did let their accounts lapse. Who knows?
It is gaining pages slower, because the players are tired of wasting their breath. However, it is being regularly checked, and 32000 views is not insignificant. Unless you are CCP apparently... ^^
It's way more than that... These are just the still unlocked threads.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=290929&p=36 36 pages - Ignored. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=291906&p=24 24 pages - Ignored. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=289554&p=9 9 pages - Ignored.
So really, we're just shy of 140 pages of threadnaughts. |

The Legendary Soldier
For the Love of Ore
294
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 20:50:00 -
[1407] - Quote
Luci Ambrye wrote:
mine goes in 17 hours and not expecting a positive outcome to all of this once ive left, final point to all those that asked, no you cant have my stuff.
borrow?
:p |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
191
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 21:52:00 -
[1408] - Quote
Nyancat Audeles wrote:All of your questions suggest/imply solutions that are a bit over the top.
That's the intention; to uncover just how far CCP is willing to go to placate their customers. Will they go far enough? Will they go (or claim to go) even farther than is reasonable? What do they consider a sufficient resolution, and where do they draw the line?
Nyancat Audeles wrote:Termination of employment? Are you absolutely nuts?
Hence the "if warranted" clause; it may be discovered that one or more employees gave currently unknown aid to SOMER on a level similar to what happened with T20. So far there is no disclosed evidence to indicate that such is the case, but I'd appreciate some insight as to what CCP would intend to do if it were. Consider it a hypothetical for the time being; basically inquiring whether CCP intends to enforce the same level of discipline that has been deemed appropriate in the past.
|

Frying Doom
3245
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 03:22:00 -
[1409] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
What definition of "community" was he using though. CCP seem to think somer are a "community" service, after all. I think the first step they need to take is
Enforce the EULA, if they cannot even do that the rest will just be diversionary tactics to make people think they are doing something. |

Kate stark
822
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 06:24:00 -
[1410] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:Melissa Morada wrote: I set several accounts to expire, and then replied to a subscription reminder with reasons why I was not renewing.
I received a reasonably helpful response from CCP Falcon, which of course I will not post here.
However, I will say that he does appear to expect this matter to be resolved to the satisfaction of the community.
I hope he is right...
That said, I still think that not updating customers for 3 or 4 weeks is very bad business practice which will result in a certain amount of damage to the CCP brand.
I have responded stating that I think it would be helpful to post in this thread...
What definition of "community" was he using though. CCP seem to think somer are a "community" service, after all. I think the first step they need to take is Enforce the EULA, if they cannot even do that the rest will just be diversionary tactics to make people think they are doing something.
you mean like "fixing" something ['RMT'] that has been perfectly acceptable for a long time in order to look like something has been ~done~ while the core and initial issue has remained untouched and ignored? |
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2601
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 10:24:00 -
[1411] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:As part of a solution, I would be interested to see CCP answer the following questions:
1. Will any and all EVE accounts associated with the SOMER Blink corporation/website be shut down for EULA violations (engaging in RMT and/or using EVE accounts for business purposes)?
2. Will any gifts to SOMER Blink members/employees be reversed (gifted ships confiscated if still in their posession, or if not, the ISK value they were sold for removed; ISK funds received from players for the EVE Vegas lottery removed)?
3. Will Markee Dragon's EVE account be banned for using it to promote a business, and will the MD site be removed as an EVE GTC reseller?
4. Will investigations be conducted into all EVE players/organizations/websites running operations similar to SOMER Blink, and if they are also found to be in violation of the EULA, will appropriate disciplinary action be taken?
5. Will any CCP employees who are proven to have demonstrated favoritism towards SOMER Blink (or any other player/group of players), or whose dealings with such groups have been less than above board, be subject to appropriate disciplinary action? If warranted, would such action potentially include termination of employment?
6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole?
Now, I'm not expecting CCP to answer each and every one of these questions in the affirmative, nor am I demanding it. I am however interested to see just how much they are willing to do to try to correct this situation, and I think their answers to these questions (as well as whether or not their actions confirm the answers) would be very telling in that regard, one way or the other.
Basically, I am looking at thes questions as a sort of gauge of CCP to measure 1) how bad they believe this situation is, and 2) how far they are willing to go to fix it (not far enough? too far?).
If the CSM and CCP are still actually going through with the surveys they promised weeks ago, then it may be a good idea to put these sorts of questions on the survey to gauge the player's expectations of what constitutes appropriate action and resolution (I'm not saying the players' opinions would be 100% right, but it would give CCP a guide as to what players are willing to accept as a solution).
answer to all of the above: no
sandbox more like litterbox
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2785
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 22:30:00 -
[1412] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:As part of a solution, I would be interested to see CCP answer the following questions:
1. Will any and all EVE accounts associated with the SOMER Blink corporation/website be shut down for EULA violations (engaging in RMT and/or using EVE accounts for business purposes)?
2. Will any gifts to SOMER Blink members/employees be reversed (gifted ships confiscated if still in their posession, or if not, the ISK value they were sold for removed; ISK funds received from players for the EVE Vegas lottery removed)?
3. Will Markee Dragon's EVE account be banned for using it to promote a business, and will the MD site be removed as an EVE GTC reseller?
4. Will investigations be conducted into all EVE players/organizations/websites running operations similar to SOMER Blink, and if they are also found to be in violation of the EULA, will appropriate disciplinary action be taken?
5. Will any CCP employees who are proven to have demonstrated favoritism towards SOMER Blink (or any other player/group of players), or whose dealings with such groups have been less than above board, be subject to appropriate disciplinary action? If warranted, would such action potentially include termination of employment?
6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole?
Now, I'm not expecting CCP to answer each and every one of these questions in the affirmative, nor am I demanding it. I am however interested to see just how much they are willing to do to try to correct this situation, and I think their answers to these questions (as well as whether or not their actions confirm the answers) would be very telling in that regard, one way or the other.
Basically, I am looking at thes questions as a sort of gauge of CCP to measure 1) how bad they believe this situation is, and 2) how far they are willing to go to fix it (not far enough? too far?).
If the CSM and CCP are still actually going through with the surveys they promised weeks ago, then it may be a good idea to put these sorts of questions on the survey to gauge the player's expectations of what constitutes appropriate action and resolution (I'm not saying the players' opinions would be 100% right, but it would give CCP a guide as to what players are willing to accept as a solution). 1) No. Why would they be? CCP, as an organization, knew about and encouraged it. The e-mail that went out giving them X days to stop selling GTCs w/ ISK incentives was the equivalent of a "warning" and that's as far as it will go. SOMER and CCP have had a good personal relationship. No one at CCP is going to mess with that. Zero chance of bans.
2) No. It's too late. Those items have already traded hands too many times.
3) No. See #1
4) Investigations: Maybe. Actions? I doubt it. See #1
5) The favoritism has already been established. That's been shown already. That's why these threads started popping up. Termination of employment? Are you mental? Maybe they'll get an e-mail with the revised policy. That's about it.
Kirren D'marr wrote:6. Will all of the above be carried out with transparency to the playerbase as a whole? 6) That's the million ISK question. |

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
Lords.Of.Midnight The Devil's Warrior Alliance
35
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 12:00:00 -
[1413] - Quote
I never understood the allure of Blink... I equate it to crack... never smoked either though, so nevermind. Seems to me like it encourages playing Blink more than Eve Online... certainly a better way to make ISK. Then you gotta buy a character to use all the cool stuff you just won - or wait to fly/anchor all of it ... or sell it.
PLEX already toes the line, imo.
|

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2787
|
Posted - 2013.11.07 19:30:00 -
[1414] - Quote
Well... f***. Talk about a big F-U.
SOMER is now offering a Billion if you buy a GTC through him. imgur screen or check his site yourself.
With this and the terrible event... I think I need a break from this game for a good while.
Nice work CCP. What a let down. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
580
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:08:00 -
[1415] - Quote
So they stopped but are still tracking data for "future bonuses".
No one can stop the data tracking of course, but this just makes it sound like they are planning to try and subvert the EULA via a loophole or something.
Personally, I think people should support all of the other lotteries out there that stopped the bonus activity immediately. Competition is good and these lotteries are more deserving of your business.
Why not set up a third party website, where lottery/gambling sites register a their api keys and certain financial data is made public to the community? A watchdog site?
|

Kate stark
826
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:28:00 -
[1416] - Quote
[obligatory "still no response from ccp" post] |

The Legendary Soldier
For the Love of Ore
297
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 13:19:00 -
[1417] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:[obligatory "still no response from ccp" post]
+1 |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2622
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 13:23:00 -
[1418] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:So they stopped but are still tracking data for "future bonuses".
No one can stop the data tracking of course, but this just makes it sound like they are planning to try and subvert the EULA via a loophole or something.
Personally, I think people should support all of the other lotteries out there that stopped the bonus activity immediately. Competition is good and these lotteries are more deserving of your business.
Why not set up a third party website, where lottery/gambling sites register a their api keys and certain financial data is made public to the community? A watchdog site?
If they have explicitly stated they are going to have "future bonuses" then their accounts need banning for admitting they are going to circumvent the EULA and continue RMTing |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
580
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 14:27:00 -
[1419] - Quote
Grats to CCP for running a poorly conceived live event while we await some statement on this. A live event that apparently had little to do with the upcoming expansion (someone correct me if I am wrong on this).
One word: messaging.
Live events are great - but should be limited to PVE exercises that promote the backstory. What would you have done if you flew into 0.0 and did not get a fight? Would you have dropped bloody SBU's and started claiming sov? Would you have killed capitals? Super capitals? .
I mean, I understand I am being a little rhetorical here and you probably had rules of engagement, but the need to have such rules makes you ineffective for leading fleets of high sec people into 0.0. There are entities who have taken up this cause already! It's like your "classes". Why do player groups have to compete against CCP and SOMERblink.
Is this a sandbox or is it CCP's and SOMER's private playground. Please let me know. I feel like I am playing a game on a damn player run server half the time anymore.
If you want to much around in 0.0 then fix the mechanics.
All I see is way too much evidence that devs would rather be players and not enough devs wanting to be devs.
Please, just get out of the sandbox. |

Kate stark
831
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 22:14:00 -
[1420] - Quote
Is it safe to say that this thread is now a monologue rather than the dialogue we hoped it would be? |
|

Frying Doom
3270
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 22:24:00 -
[1421] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Is it safe to say that this thread is now a monologue rather than the dialogue we hoped it would be? Maybe someone should send CCP a dictionary with that word highlighted. |

Kate stark
831
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 22:26:00 -
[1422] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Kate stark wrote:Is it safe to say that this thread is now a monologue rather than the dialogue we hoped it would be? Maybe someone should send CCP a dictionary with that word highlighted. I feel like that would be akin to sending a starving man a book by Delia Smith. |

The Legendary Soldier
For the Love of Ore
298
|
Posted - 2013.11.09 00:08:00 -
[1423] - Quote
If I had ignored angry customers this long, I would now be looking for a new job.... |

DNSBLACK
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
501
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 06:32:00 -
[1424] - Quote
The longer we stew the more you tend to **** us off. The sad part is you know you have no right answer to this and it is either save you friend somer who paid for your free trip to vegas or save the sand box. I guess after the last live event and how f!@# up it was you are leaning towards letting somer off the hook. To bad you could have done so much more. Hey the rubicon funny video was a winner and a waste of my time. Give an answer please. |

Skeito
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 11:01:00 -
[1425] - Quote
After getting a subs running out mail and contacting them saying why my sub was been left to run out, I was interested in the reply that I got back from a GM which basically said that from now on, these incentives offered by Somer are not exactly illegal/outlawed/call it what you will, more a case of you now need CCP permission to be able to do it.
I just find that strange and very worrying and am hoping that the GM just had a bad day doing petitions and just worded it wrongly. |

Skeito
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 11:04:00 -
[1426] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:So they stopped but are still tracking data for "future bonuses".
No one can stop the data tracking of course, but this just makes it sound like they are planning to try and subvert the EULA via a loophole or something.
Personally, I think people should support all of the other lotteries out there that stopped the bonus activity immediately. Competition is good and these lotteries are more deserving of your business.
Why not set up a third party website, where lottery/gambling sites register a their api keys and certain financial data is made public to the community? A watchdog site?
as per my previous post, it seems as though if you ask for CCP permission to do this, it may be allowed in the future. |

The Legendary Soldier
For the Love of Ore
298
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 13:05:00 -
[1427] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: Why not set up a third party website, where lottery/gambling sites register a their api keys and certain financial data is made public to the community? A watchdog site?
Although there is a question of honesty, that is not the biggest question.
ALL lotteries make money - whether honest or not.
WHERE DOES THE MONEY GO?
It seemed clear that CCP were not going to do the right thing because it was right.
Only a lot of bad publicity, or mass un-subscriptions would force them.
Sadly most people don't think this matters, so there is not enough force. At least now, we know we are dealing with an entity that has no integrity, and can be bought at the right price.
|

Frying Doom
3346
|
Posted - 2013.11.10 20:53:00 -
[1428] - Quote
I see CCP still has not responded and is back to removing things it does not like from the forums. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
93
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 03:26:00 -
[1429] - Quote
Originally posted on 16/10/2013, Post 714,
Deka Ekato wrote:CCP / CSM, "In regards to the CSM / CCP survey" - Have you addressed the issues? A : No. You have only addressed your own business concerns. - Do you know what the issues are? It seems you are turning a blind eye, ignoring your customers. Just for a few, ( hell, alot ) dollars more - This is the best course of action you can come up with in trying to fix this issue? ( I don't think you are trying to fix anything at all ) Sad, pathetic and disgusting. You are absolutely ######### on your customers. ( You can use any "mean" word to fill in the blank ) Somer, CCP's proxy Aurum store. Brought to you by "Greed is Good" and Somer Blink, ( wearing his designer jeans and monocle, and a wide smile ) 
- Seriously CCP, how many working days do you need to formulate a response to your customer concerns regarding Somer? - Are you ever going to give an answer to these concerns?
- The so called "survey" as mentioned by your proxy PR Department, ( the CSM ), is not an answer, nor is it in any way a way to solve the issues.
Has CCP reached the point where they don't want customers, they just simply want your money?
Hey CSM members, where the hell are you??????????????
CCP, IMO, you no longer have any integrity. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
519
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:12:00 -
[1430] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I see CCP still has not responded and is back to removing things it does not like from the forums.
And now we have GMs interfering because of DUST players.
EvE Online, so hardcore it comes with a free stuffed animal.
Wait, where's my stuffed animal?
WHERE THE F*** IS MY STUFFED ANIMAL CCP?! |
|

Frying Doom
3353
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:32:00 -
[1431] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Frying Doom wrote:I see CCP still has not responded and is back to removing things it does not like from the forums.
And now we have GMs interfering because of DUST players.
EvE Online, so hardcore it comes with a free stuffed animal. Wait, where's my stuffed animal? WHERE THE F*** IS MY STUFFED ANIMAL CCP?! You just have to petition CCP
They get out everything these days
Skill Points, the ability to run a business, everything. Including stuffed animals Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Artemis Ellery Sazas
Shock and Awe Inc.
12
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 12:00:00 -
[1432] - Quote
This has been a disgrace from the start. What a horrible way to run a business. Change the rules as you go and refuse any real communication with your clients. Has the CSM given a reason why they are not holding CCP's feet to the fire? Where are all the CSM members and why haven't we heard anything from them either? Either they have no real influence with CCP or they are a bit too cozy with them. Would be nice to hear some input and regular updates from the CSM members concerning this matter. What does CSM stand for again?
If the player base really wants to get CCP's attention, start boycotting live events, in game events and start dropping accounts. They will crumble when enough pressure is applied and their egos get bruised enough. Right now they don't give a **** about the average player and that needs to change.
I have already dropped half my accounts and more will be dropped shortly.
No, you can't have all my stuff, but thanks for asking. |

Kate stark
861
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 20:25:00 -
[1433] - Quote
If ccp can't even be arsed to post in this thread, i can't be arsed to construct a proper post to point out that we're still being ignored and they're clearly full of **** and don't care about the topic.
you can always forgive a **** up if it's dealt with, but just ignoring pretty much all of the feedback when there has been over 140 pages from 2 threads alone is just a joke. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

thowlimer
Roprocor Ltd
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 20:33:00 -
[1434] - Quote
Unless my memory has gone completely soggy over the last weeks it seems something fishy is going on behind the scenes if you check the https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=275730&find=unread (list of blogs etc in information portal) I cant see any community spotlight link for Somer in there and i could have sworn CCP made one of those earlier ...
*tinfoil hat off*
thowlimer |

Abditus Cularius
Clancularius Industries
224
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 00:27:00 -
[1435] - Quote
thowlimer wrote:Unless my memory has gone completely soggy over the last weeks
I'm betting it sucked from the start.
That list summarizes 2013. The post you're thinking of was in 2012
|

thowlimer
Roprocor Ltd
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 06:34:00 -
[1436] - Quote
Abditus Cularius wrote:thowlimer wrote:Unless my memory has gone completely soggy over the last weeks I'm betting it sucked from the start. That list summarizes 2013. The post you're thinking of was in 2012
so at leat the memory was 10/10, google search skills 0/10 tho  |

The Legendary Soldier
For the Love of Ore
301
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 10:24:00 -
[1437] - Quote
thowlimer wrote:Unless my memory has gone completely soggy over the last weeks it seems something fishy is going on behind the scenes if you check the https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=275730&find=unread (list of blogs etc in information portal) I cant see any community spotlight link for Somer in there and i could have sworn CCP made one of those earlier ... *tinfoil hat off* thowlimer
Were you thinking of this?
http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/world-news/somer-blink-celebrates-900-trillion-isk-in-prizes-2/ Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
587
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 23:03:00 -
[1438] - Quote
No word yet eh?
I find that little bit about SOMER still tracking purchases for "future rewards" a little fishy. And no I am not insisting that they plan to violate the EULA in the future.
What they are doing, is making people believe that there will be in game rewards to be had in the future, so that they buy isk from them. This is dishonest and manipulative marketing.
CCP should just flat out say that GTC's must resell at a price of x with no promises of possible rewards, in game or otherwise. It is pretty apparent that the GTC sellers are not allowed to undersell each other, and so why should their referral agents be allowed to promise special bonuses?
All in CCP's hands now I suppose. I suppose all I can do is just laugh at the poor fools who continue to throw SOMER their RL cash in the secret hopes of being thrown an isk bone. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 23:44:00 -
[1439] - Quote
This whole thing must be hilarious for Somer, he has totally got CCP under his thumb and jumping through loops for him.
I mean, if anyone has won eve, it is Somer, frankly.
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
96
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 01:55:00 -
[1440] - Quote
Dear CCP,
You might think that it is only a vocal minority who are concerned about the Somer issue, but I believe many of the Eve community are concerned about this issue, ( although this might not be immediately apparent ).
You seem to have a policy of "silence" over this issue, hoping that the vocal minority will give up and go away.
IMO that's poor customer service.
CCP, is your financial situation so grim that you are willing to do anything so as to maintain your incoming financial revenue, even to stooping so low as to allow entities to violate your own EULA / TOS ?
Have you become so dependant on GTC / PLEX sales that you are willing to risk the amount of subscribers and to sacrifice your company's integrity ?
Come on CCP, please respond and fix this issue.
Kate stark wrote:Is it safe to say that this thread is now a monologue rather than the dialogue we hoped it would be?
As per the quote, CCP, please don't allow this thread to be a monologue. |
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 04:22:00 -
[1441] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:Dear CCP, You might think that it is only a vocal minority who are concerned about the Somer issue, but I believe many of the Eve community are concerned about this issue, ( although this might not be immediately apparent ). You seem to have a policy of "silence" over this issue, hoping that the vocal minority will give up and go away. IMO that's poor customer service. CCP, is your financial situation so grim that you are willing to do anything so as to maintain your incoming financial revenue, even to stooping so low as to allow entities to violate your own EULA / TOS ? Have you become so dependant on GTC / PLEX sales that you are willing to risk the amount of subscribers and to sacrifice your company's integrity ? Come on CCP, please respond and fix this issue. Kate stark wrote:Is it safe to say that this thread is now a monologue rather than the dialogue we hoped it would be? As per the quote, CCP, please don't allow this thread to be a monologue.
When are you guys going to learn... CCP will just ignore you posting in this thread is completely pointless at this stage.
You have no leverage, just give up. |

Frying Doom
3368
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 05:56:00 -
[1442] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:When are you guys going to learn... CCP will just ignore you posting in this thread is completely pointless at this stage.
You have no leverage, just give up. The only good things to come out of this has been, Somer stopping 'redacted' for the moment, the players have seen just how bad CCP are at customer service (like we needed another reminder), that CCP are happy to ignore their EULA for some people and that the CSM really is nothing more than a CCP PR group.
The CSM can hardly claim they aren't after this one, I mean propose a survey and then run and hide. So much for the voice of the players. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
525
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 08:55:00 -
[1443] - Quote
So, I guess it's time to push the major internet publications this way. I'm thinking the stories could involve CCP refusing to honor its own EULA, how they are pulling a t20 here, and how they are violating the laws of a couple of countries by advocating internet gambling. You might not think it's much, but remember what happened with the publicity Monoclegate and Mittens' little foray into cyberbullying had? |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
97
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 09:29:00 -
[1444] - Quote
What exactly was CCP's instructions to entities who had a GTC / PLEX referal service?
Was it simply for the entities to stop supplying customers with bonus ISK or was it for the GTC / PLEX sellers to stop giving a cash commission to the entities who refered potential customers to buy the GTC / PLEX from them, or both?
Can anyone clear this up for me please?
Thanks. |

Frying Doom
3369
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 10:19:00 -
[1445] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:What exactly was CCP's instructions to entities who had a GTC / PLEX referal service?
Was it simply for the entities to stop supplying customers with bonus ISK or was it for the GTC / PLEX sellers to stop giving a cash commission to the entities who refered potential customers to buy the GTC / PLEX from them, or both?
Can anyone clear this up for me please?
Thanks. Just to stop their referrers from giving out bonuses with the GTC purchases. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
302
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 10:32:00 -
[1446] - Quote
Only external pressure will get a result here.
CCP has shown that it is willing to ignore this thread indefinitely.
There will be no response unless the profile can be raised by making noise elsewhere.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
98
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 13:30:00 -
[1447] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:What exactly was CCP's instructions to entities who had a GTC / PLEX referal service?
Was it simply for the entities to stop supplying customers with bonus ISK or was it for the GTC / PLEX sellers to stop giving a cash commission to the entities who refered potential customers to buy the GTC / PLEX from them, or both?
Can anyone clear this up for me please?
Thanks. Just to stop their referrers from giving out bonuses with the GTC purchases.
Thanks for the responce.
So, if this is the case, Somer can still be dealing in RMT.  
GTC / PLEX sellers could still be giving a cash commission to the entities who refered potential customers to buy the GTC / PLEX from them.
In Somers's case , on it's website, the method of referal system is still there. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
202
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 19:02:00 -
[1448] - Quote
Hey CCP, you might want to go searching for whatever dark hole your responses to this issue disappeared into, because I think the money for my subscription renewal must have ended up in the same place.
In case I have to spell it out, there is no way you will see one before I see the other (and it had better be good)!
For everyone else in this thread, I had submitted a petition reporting Autumnries Mahm (as CEO) and every member of the SOMER Blink corp as being in violation of the EULA for using their accounts for business purposes, and cited the article reporting their $135K+ earnings as evidence. While I cannot disclose the results of this petition or what communication I may or may not have received, I will say that the experience was interesting. I can only suggest that others do the same, in order to 1) put more pressure on CCP to take real action, and 2) discover whatever response you may receive for yourself. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
527
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 19:50:00 -
[1449] - Quote
Something amusing.
While you cannot directly post the response you receive from CCP, you also cannot post chat logs on these forums as well. However, linking to a third-party website that contains said chatlogs is completely legal if we assume that CCP's past inaction on these events leads me to believe that there is no violation of the EULA or TOS if you do the same with CCP responses to petitions.
See, I can play the "let's head into grey territory" game too! |

Kate stark
865
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 21:36:00 -
[1450] - Quote
increasing the post count because that's all we're doing now. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Frying Doom
3371
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 23:20:00 -
[1451] - Quote
Now we have more odd things happening, in relation to Erotica1. Apparently an investigation, they can apparently do things for something like that but not for someone stomping the EULA.
Hopefully it is not about the following.
Mynnna wrote:Openly and shamelessly admitting you're building a collection of IRL pictures from your "clients" with absolutely no awareness of how creepy that is.
Thanks for making my point, I couldn't have done It better myself.
If it is about posting RL pictures that would be a rather strange thing given the following.
http://crackerjax.org/gwiki/GoonWIki/wiki.goonfleet.com/Jade_Constantine.html Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Bookish
Exodus Development
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 18:12:00 -
[1452] - Quote
everyday I look here for a CCP replay on matter, everytime i go away disappointed.
|

Kate stark
866
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 20:51:00 -
[1453] - Quote
i was going to write something sarcastic and borderline rude, but instead i'm just going to casually point out that we've yet to get a response about a month now.
I'm a patient person but there's a fine line between "taking your time to get it right" and just flat out ignoring us (which is pretty rude since you guys opened the thread asking for our input). Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
218
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 02:57:00 -
[1454] - Quote
CCP went completely silent when Somer went into full cash-out mode earlier this month. didn't have any problem letting them get all their *redacted* done and no forum posts about the legalities of it, etc.
now, when the community actively wants to do their own cashout, but with the results going to charity, and the timing is critical, CCP is going into the legalese about it...
what a ****** up set of priorities |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
102
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 05:33:00 -
[1455] - Quote
Originally posted in the "PLEX for Philippines" thread
Thanks to Ace Boogi in pointing out CCP's disgusting double standards.
#63Posted: 2013.11.15 05:28 | Report
Quote:CCP Falcon wrote:
It's nice to see that despite the fact you're all a big pack of meanies in game, there's a really positive vibe when it comes to programs such as PLEX for GOOD.
We're well aware of the horrible situation in the Philippines right now, and everyone who has been affected has our most sincere sympathies.
The Community Team are currently discussing potential options for what we may be able to do to harness the good will of the EVE Community, and are liaising with other departments at CCP to look into the best option.
While we can't promise anything at this stage, we're looking at the situation to see what, if anything, we can do to allow EVE Players to assist.
Apologies for the delay with regards to responding to this, but there are a lot of hoops to jump through in terms of conforming with legality before we can proceed with any form of donations.
Quote:CCP, are you kidding us ?
- You delay / don't proceed with a worthwhile charity drive, ( while in the past, there have been more than one successful charity drive occasions ), due to legal issues ? What the hell ????!!!!????
- But you are so quick to praise / promote / white knight, ( and dare I say, support ), your favourite business partner Somer.
My God CCP, what greedy double standards.
Edit |

Kate stark
867
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 06:17:00 -
[1456] - Quote
"hey guys, buy plex... but only if it helps us!" Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 11:08:00 -
[1457] - Quote
In all honesty, we have served our purpose. The Somerblink RMT has stopped and CCP will probably be more cautious when spawning free billion isk ships in the future.
The only thing left to complain about is being totally ignored in this thread. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
303
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 11:12:00 -
[1458] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=296057&find=unread
some things can get instant attention...
^^ Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
869
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 14:42:00 -
[1459] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:In all honesty, we have served our purpose. The Somerblink RMT has stopped and CCP will probably be more cautious when spawning free billion isk ships in the future.
The only thing left to complain about is being totally ignored in this thread.
this thread was never about RMT. this thread hasn't served ANY purpose. the only thing left to complain about is the original pissing issue, you know, ******* with the sandbox giving one set of players ingame assets with no set of governing criteria, etc. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
211
|
Posted - 2013.11.15 21:45:00 -
[1460] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:In all honesty, we have served our purpose. The Somerblink RMT has stopped and CCP will probably be more cautious when spawning free billion isk ships in the future.
The only thing left to complain about is being totally ignored in this thread.
Are the accounts of members of SOMER Blink still active? If so, the EULA is still in violation for CCP's pet corporation, and there is still something to complain about.
Until CCP shows that they are willing to give SOMER Blink the same treatment that they regularly apply to other RMTers and game accounts used for business purposes, there is dev favoritism in the sandbox. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 15:00:00 -
[1461] - Quote
CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe.
It does seem a bit wierd to me that they gave Somer a good will bonus period to RMT in (it wasn't ended with instant effect) and that CCP are reading this thread but not saying anything.
I think the reason is because at the start of the thread, we shot down all their rationalisations and justifications pretty expediently, so now they have deemed us 'unreasonable to talk to'.
Someone at CCP has ordered a total blackout on this topic, and it is clearly justified by claiming we are all unreasonable and posting troll material. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
303
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 16:23:00 -
[1462] - Quote
Once again, I have to ask where is, and what is the point of, the CSM?
May as well disband it!
If any of the current CSM ask for my vote in any future campaign they can whistle for it... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
871
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 16:49:00 -
[1463] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: Once again, I have to ask where is, and what is the point of, the CSM?
May as well disband it!
If any of the current CSM ask for my vote in any future campaign they can whistle for it...
part of me wouldn't be surprised to find out that CCP aren't saying anything to them either.
it seems like if they fly enough rifters around the office, and make enough gifs, people might forget this sticky exists. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
303
|
Posted - 2013.11.16 17:44:00 -
[1464] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: part of me wouldn't be surprised to find out that CCP aren't saying anything to them either.
it seems like if they fly enough rifters around the office, and make enough gifs, people might forget this sticky exists.
If the first part of that is true, then the CSM need to grow some BALLS! Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
305
|
Posted - 2013.11.17 10:10:00 -
[1465] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:
For everyone else in this thread, I had submitted a petition reporting Autumnries Mahm (as CEO) and every member of the SOMER Blink corp as being in violation of the EULA for using their accounts for business purposes, and cited the article reporting their $135K+ earnings as evidence. While I cannot disclose the results of this petition or what communication I may or may not have received, I will say that the experience was interesting. I can only suggest that others do the same, in order to 1) put more pressure on CCP to take real action, and 2) discover whatever response you may receive for yourself.
Tried this. On the 13th. Still waiting... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
216
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 17:36:00 -
[1466] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe.
If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers.
So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues?
Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 17:40:00 -
[1467] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe. If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers. So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues?
Since Somer Blink is no longer doing the RMT portion of this at CCP's clarification, wouldn't they have to break the rules post notification by CCP to be banned?
I know, I know - common sense is a bit much to ask from rabid fan-boys who just want to tear down people who are more successful than they are, but still. Somer has been in compliance the entire time. CCP endorsed them until they didn't anymore, at which point they changed the way they they do business to comply with CCP's new rules.
Once again, the butthurt is strong in all of you.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Kate stark
883
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:25:00 -
[1468] - Quote
still nothing.
rubicon is early due to christmas holidays so i doubt we'll get a reply to this before 2014, if we ever get one. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Xeen Du'Wang
Knights of the Black Watch
44
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:39:00 -
[1469] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe. If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers. So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues? Since Somer Blink is no longer doing the RMT portion of this at CCP's clarification, wouldn't they have to break the rules post notification by CCP to be banned? I know, I know - common sense is a bit much to ask from rabid fan-boys who just want to tear down people who are more successful than they are, but still. Somer has been in compliance the entire time. CCP endorsed them until they didn't anymore, at which point they changed the way they they do business to comply with CCP's new rules. Once again, the butthurt is strong in all of you.
Speaking of Rabid Fan Boys |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 18:44:00 -
[1470] - Quote
Xeen Du'Wang wrote:Slappy Andven wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe. If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers. So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues? Since Somer Blink is no longer doing the RMT portion of this at CCP's clarification, wouldn't they have to break the rules post notification by CCP to be banned? I know, I know - common sense is a bit much to ask from rabid fan-boys who just want to tear down people who are more successful than they are, but still. Somer has been in compliance the entire time. CCP endorsed them until they didn't anymore, at which point they changed the way they they do business to comply with CCP's new rules. Once again, the butthurt is strong in all of you. Speaking of Rabid Fan Boys
So, I laid out my position. Do you have anything substantive to rebut it with? Or, just more butthurt like the above?
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |
|

Frying Doom
3390
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 20:34:00 -
[1471] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe. If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers. So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues? Since Somer Blink is no longer doing the RMT portion of this at CCP's clarification, wouldn't they have to break the rules post notification by CCP to be banned? I know, I know - common sense is a bit much to ask from rabid fan-boys who just want to tear down people who are more successful than they are, but still. Somer has been in compliance the entire time. CCP endorsed them until they didn't anymore, at which point they changed the way they they do business to comply with CCP's new rules. Once again, the butthurt is strong in all of you. Except Somer is still a business operating accounts on EvE Online, so they are still in breach of the EULA. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Thatt Guy
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.11.18 21:17:00 -
[1472] - Quote
Why not just admit that Somer made CCP a LOT of RL money thru it's RMT "giveaways", and as such you wanted to give them something in return (not like the thousands of RL USD weren't enough).
Somer has been violating the EULA on RMT for years, and it wasn't until the community became outraged that you decided to stop it.
They made you money, so you cheated in their favor. (because no other rare ship had value on TQ right?) |

TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance Cynosural Field Theory.
103
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 13:08:00 -
[1473] - Quote
Remove sticky, don't reply, hope the thread disappears in the mass of the new Rubicon threads? |

Lord LazyGhost
The Bastards The Bastards.
187
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 13:43:00 -
[1474] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:iskflakes wrote:When you reward somebody by giving them PLEX nobody else suffers any serious devaluation. When you give somebody an IWS all other IWS owners and collectors get completely screwed over because the price collapses.
Just give people PLEX in future, as much as you like, but no rare items ever. That argument I would agree with in regards to certain rare items, but not the ISW as it was created for the express purpose of being a reward for all kinds of contributions and contests, making it inevitable that the price of the early ones will plummet. The problem more people would have with it is much rather that those who get it early gain more by selling it than those who get it late, which is a byproduct of slowly seeding rare items in this manner.
HI guard
easiest way to sort this out. Yes give out in game ships the IWS if you choose it to be that ship that's fine. but as new rewards to people Like somer and what ever Bind it to there A. Char or B account. that way they get a shiny ship. are happy the people that own IWS from before this happend can still make money from selling thirs if they choose.
and also an out of game reward be it a USB rifter, a copy of the board game o even a signed Picture of game artwork from the art team would be a better show of gratitude then someone hitting a few keys and makeing a few pixcels for someone in game
regards Lazy |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
310
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 14:41:00 -
[1475] - Quote
No longer sticky.
But it will not die unless we let it. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
555
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 15:26:00 -
[1476] - Quote
I would say that CCP having a skype discussion with SOMER and letting them up their eula breaking ISK bonus to 1 billion for a week is response enough to this thread. Not today spaghetti. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2638
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 15:53:00 -
[1477] - Quote
TinkerHell wrote:Remove sticky, don't reply, hope the thread disappears in the mass of the new Rubicon threads?
Rubican't make me forget about this disgusting state of affairs |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
466
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 16:47:00 -
[1478] - Quote
I was wondering the yesterday if CCP was ever going to follow up on their promise. Guess the PostIt fell off the whiteboard CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
529
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 16:54:00 -
[1479] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:TinkerHell wrote:Remove sticky, don't reply, hope the thread disappears in the mass of the new Rubicon threads? Rubican't make me forget about this disgusting state of affairs
Just so CCP is aware, I am a writer for Massively, the gaming and MMO online publication. I believe I mentioned that previously, but I could be wrong (it could be on the old forums, or on one of my alts, I Don't freaking remember).
This is the reason you have had problems in the past, CCP, when it comes to dealing with publicity. You create the thread that catches the eye--CCP Pan's threadnaught about "Monoclegate" during Incarna, this thread, etc.--and then when you realize there is a lot of anger from even a small percentage of players who play the game, you assume that that it okay and that people are a vocal minority.
Something you learn in business is that even a small percentage of customers are still customers. You can't make everyone happy, but if you ignore people who are unhappy, it will eventually blossom and sprout branches. Eventually, more people hop on to be upset over something. While many people I have talked to in-game think this entire debacle is blow out of proportion, they do agree that the underlying issue(s) are valid. Put simply, you cannot ignore this and make it go away.
You may have told the GTC resellers what you want done, but you created this thread, and you haven't updated it in over a month. You haven't publically informed us of what was said. So here's what I am going to do: I am going to get in touch with Markee Dragon and others, and ask them for the e-mail correspondence. Then, I am going to write up an article(actually, I'll be honest: I'm writing up the article as we speak), ripping open the old wounds of t20, the release of Incarna and the NeX ("Monoclegate"), and the recent debacle with The Mittani. I am going to simply point to your willingness to take a dump on your customerbase by giving nothing but half-truthes, or not answering at all. I will include the correspondence I get.
And while I would love to include your response in the article itself, I feel ignored in this thread, so I will take that as your official response. I do want both sides of the coin for integrity purposes, but in order to do that, you'd have to be on the record. And considering how nervous you are about being on the record on your own forums, I Don't htink you'll be willing to be on it off of them. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore in a Day's Work
312
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 16:56:00 -
[1480] - Quote
I received a response to the ticket I mentioned above.
Whilst I cannot post it here, I can say that it appears to me that CCP appear to consider the matter closed.
So it would appear that the rules apply, except when the rules do not apply.
And I guess the CSM is dead, or impotent, which is the same as dead in my book.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
530
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 17:01:00 -
[1481] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: I received a response to the ticket I mentioned above.
Whilst I cannot post it here, I can say that it appears to me that CCP appear to consider the matter closed.
So it would appear that the rules apply, except when the rules do not apply.
And I guess the CSM is dead, or impotent, which is the same as dead in my book.
Please e-mail the response to this character, or to my personal e-mail:
[email protected] |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
954
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 17:06:00 -
[1482] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote: I received a response to the ticket I mentioned above.
Whilst I cannot post it here, I can say that it appears to me that CCP appear to consider the matter closed.
So it would appear that the rules apply, except when the rules do not apply.
And I guess the CSM is dead, or impotent, which is the same as dead in my book.
Please e-mail the response to this character, or to my personal e-mail: [email protected]
Might be best not to let your personal Email address go floating around on these forums devil. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
530
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 17:22:00 -
[1483] - Quote
JC Anderson wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote: I received a response to the ticket I mentioned above.
Whilst I cannot post it here, I can say that it appears to me that CCP appear to consider the matter closed.
So it would appear that the rules apply, except when the rules do not apply.
And I guess the CSM is dead, or impotent, which is the same as dead in my book.
Please e-mail the response to this character, or to my personal e-mail: [email protected] Might be best not to let your personal Email address go floating around on these forums devil.
Considering it isn't linked to any accounts for this game or any others, nor my Massively information...I'm fine. I'm aware of DOXing and the like, but considering it doesn't have my address attached or anything, I think I'm pretty safe. Maybe not perfectly, but...well, yeah. :) |

Kate stark
889
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 18:33:00 -
[1484] - Quote
no response, unstickied.
amazing. simply amazing. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

destiny2
Perkone Caldari State
265
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 18:39:00 -
[1485] - Quote
i saw the ishkunes on jita market for 11 bill why the hell would anyone pay 11 bill for a ship that refines into 1 trit ;D |

SkullKid
Arch welding co. Brothers Of The Dark Sun
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 18:50:00 -
[1486] - Quote
Outrage! that is all i have to say about this conspiracy |

Tollen Gallen
Xionworld
2998
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 18:53:00 -
[1487] - Quote
I like Battleships. Zimmy Zeta -I f*cking love martinis.the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
219
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 19:27:00 -
[1488] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Slappy Andven wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:CCP can't ban any Somer accounts, because it gave Somer permission to do what it did, or so I have been lead to believe. If that's the case, then CCP cannot ban anyone else for similar activity, or otherwise discourage or prohibit such activity. If the rulse are to be applied, they must be done so equally for all players. If the rules are not to be enforced, then it also must be done equally for all customers. So CCP has a tough decision to make: do they ban all of SOMER Blink regardless of what they may have told them before, and begin to actually enforce these rules, or do they allow everyone else to engage in the same activities (using game acounts for business purposes, ISK and item bonuses for cash purchases, etc.) and reverse any previous bans over these issues? Since Somer Blink is no longer doing the RMT portion of this at CCP's clarification, wouldn't they have to break the rules post notification by CCP to be banned? I know, I know - common sense is a bit much to ask from rabid fan-boys who just want to tear down people who are more successful than they are, but still. Somer has been in compliance the entire time. CCP endorsed them until they didn't anymore, at which point they changed the way they they do business to comply with CCP's new rules. Once again, the butthurt is strong in all of you. Except Somer is still a business operating accounts on EvE Online, so they are still in breach of the EULA.
Exactly. I don't know how CCP can consider the matter closed when this activity is still allowed to continue.
And Slappy, just a little friendly advice: throwing around random insults that don't even make any sense doesn't really bolster your argument. I'm clearly not a "rabid fan-boy" of CCP, nor of Somer; so who or what exactly am I supposed to be a fan-boy of? All I seek is a fair and equal application of the rules; I champion no individual or group in this discussion, so the label hardly appies. I suggest you learn what words mean before you try using them. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Frying Doom
3394
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 21:06:00 -
[1489] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:no response, unstickied.
amazing. simply amazing. More great customer service. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Kate stark
890
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 21:11:00 -
[1490] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Kate stark wrote:no response, unstickied.
amazing. simply amazing. More great customer service.
customer service.
i don't think that phrase means what ccp thinks it means. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
534
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 21:16:00 -
[1491] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:no response, unstickied.
amazing. simply amazing.
According to CCP's response to the petition TLS put in, they consider the matter "closed". No public response on it, just an attempt to hide what was going on. In essence, trying to sweep it under the rug and make us forget. I'll use that for the publication. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
313
|
Posted - 2013.11.19 21:16:00 -
[1492] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Kate stark wrote:no response, unstickied.
amazing. simply amazing. More great customer service. customer service. i don't think that phrase means what ccp thinks it means.
They know, they just dont give a ****.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 03:09:00 -
[1493] - Quote
So, CCP has,
- unstickied this thread - consider this, ( Somer ), matter closed - consider the vocal minority of protesters to be "unreasonable to talk to"
CCP, do you even know what Community Relations means and what's it's all about ? - Do you have a Public Relations Department ? ( No, not your PR puppets, the CSM ). - Don't you have an Internal Affairs Department ?
CCP, your silence on this issue is, well, pretty disgusting. Hoping that this thread and the Somer protesters will simply go away and disapear is really bad form. Ignoring angry customers, ( especially for so long ), is just plain rude.
CCP, you can't be that desperate to get money, that you allow your "business partners" to violate your own TOS / EULA ?
"Earth calling CCP, come in CCP. Where are you, CCP ?"
OK, let's list CCP's "mishaps" of recent times :-
- Somer favouritism - Somer RMT, ( the major issue ) - Live Event debarcle - Plex for Good, Philippines, "legal issues"
Personally, I don't know what to make out of :- - the Dust Corp protection - the "New Hype"
The, "Skill point reimbursement" topic, I don't know if that's true or not.
CCP, what's happening to your company ? |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
534
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 04:48:00 -
[1494] - Quote
If memory serves, the vast majority of the public relations department (at least that handles the forums and interwebz) was let go off following Monoclegate. Everything is now handled by volunteers or the CSM. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
109
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 05:36:00 -
[1495] - Quote
So, tha's it............
In the sense of achieving in Eve, it's "GAME OVER"
No matter how much teritory you hold, how much ISK you earn and have, or how many killmails you gain, NO ONE will ever be able to surpass Somer's achievement.
Somer has effectively WON Eve, for they have achieved the ultimate.
Somer has managed to make real money off CCP's intelectual property and get away with doing so. 
Maybe I was not mature enough in my arguments about this issue. Maybe I wasn't clear / loud enough, maybe,................, I just don't know........................ |

Kate stark
890
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 06:06:00 -
[1496] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:So, CCP has,
- unstickied this thread - consider this, ( Somer ), matter closed - consider the vocal minority of protesters to be "unreasonable to talk to"
"unreasonable to talk to". how would they know? they haven't even tried. i think the most constructive post in the thread from ccp was guard saying he was going to have pizza.
if the matter is closed surely a post explaining their position isn't too much to ask for?
**** it, i don't know why i'm still wasting my time, it's clear ccp don't give a **** so why should i? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2805
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 06:08:00 -
[1497] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:So, tha's it............ In the sense of achieving in Eve, it's "GAME OVER" No matter how much teritory you hold, how much ISK / wealth you earn and have, or how many killmails you gain, NO ONE will ever be able to surpass Somer's achievement. Somer has effectively WON Eve, for they have achieved the ultimate. Somer has managed to make real money off CCP's intelectual property and get away with doing so.  Maybe I was not mature enough in my arguments about this issue. Maybe I wasn't clear / loud enough, maybe,................, I just don't know........................ The people getting screwed are the people who play the end game. The alliance heads. This is stupid... CCP is fumbling an important ball here... so what happens next? Meh. Loss of subs. Loss of the "give a shi**er factor." The problem is they are losing the drivers of the game despite the previous observation that it's a "vocal minority" who's upset about this. They can bury it... but what lies next is a constant downward pressure on subs as people gradually loose interest in the game and go to another. Whatever. I think CCP needs the kick in their complacent sack. They'll fire a bunch of people and get scared before they acknowledge this problem. Let's face it... they are the last to know. CCP reacts. It's not a proactive organization. Once they start losing large numbers of subs they'll change their ways. Until then, EvE will be what it is... and the Gogela will abide...
|

Leigh Akiga
State War Academy Caldari State
349
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 06:35:00 -
[1498] - Quote
So there was never any response to this huh. Just hope it goes away? |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
315
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 08:11:00 -
[1499] - Quote
We cannot let it "go away" Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
44
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 08:13:00 -
[1500] - Quote
can someone please write a mittani article or something |
|

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
315
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 08:54:00 -
[1501] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:So, CCP has,
- unstickied this thread - consider this, ( Somer ), matter closed - consider the vocal minority of protesters to be "unreasonable to talk to" "unreasonable to talk to". how would they know? they haven't even tried. i think the most constructive post in the thread from ccp was guard saying he was going to have pizza. if the matter is closed surely a post explaining their position isn't too much to ask for? **** it, i don't know why i'm still wasting my time, it's clear ccp don't give a **** so why should i?
I think it's more a case of the vocal minority are RIGHT.
So their choices are: Hang their friends (who made them a lot of money) out to dry. or Admit they drove a coach and horses through their own stated rules.
Apparently they have neither the courage, nor the integrity to make the choice.
So they are hoping we will let it slide... ^^
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2639
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 11:11:00 -
[1502] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: We cannot let it "go away"
It'll go away with my account subscription.
It really was the tipping point, for me.
Stating a particular ingame player entity were 100% trustworthy and officially endorsed by CCP Giving that ingame player entity special items in order to use for their ingame events/business Giving that ingame player entities owners/"employees" direct personal gifts worth tens of billions each Allowing that ingame player entity to break the EULA/TOS Allowing that ingame player entity to have direct control over who can access new content (rather than everyone in EVE having a shot at the new rare shinies, only those who payed somer, and who somer did not ban for nebulous reasons were allowed) Not consulting the CSM on any of the above before doing it Refusing to address any of these issues and hoping they can just wait silently
it's simply appalling |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
113
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 13:04:00 -
[1503] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far.
Post 107, on 10/10/2013.
Seems CCP are still out, too busy eating their pizza.  |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2142
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 14:26:00 -
[1504] - Quote
So, I just used my reverse imbursed PLEX to check on my favourite game I'm not subscribed to, checking if the new expansion added something for my play style and I find that it no longer matters really.
The quality of the game no longer means anything when CCP disqualifies itself as a company worth supporting with money. And with their treatment of the matter laid out in this thread, they went a long way towards disqualifying themselves. Sure with the expansion coming out and everybody busy with eating pizza, one can't expect a prompt and thorough answer, though I do wonder what those $2.5 million the PR budged was bumped up with are actually used for.
Thinking about that made me a bit angry, considering you could hire a good 100 level designers for $2.5 mil, who could each do one level per week, amounting to 4800 new levels for missions, anomalies and locations. Instead we get a %2.5 mil pizza.
So with that I doubt I'd go for another PLEX even if I'd find something to do in my solo player non-combatant industrialist niche. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
315
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 17:07:00 -
[1505] - Quote
Someone on twitter pointed out the similarity with 1984...
"All players are equal - but some are more equal than others."
They are right - and "Big Brother" is certainly watching because unfavourable posts are being locked like lightening. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
114
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 17:40:00 -
[1506] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. Post 107, on 10/10/2013. Seems CCP are still out, too busy eating their pizza. 
OMG, this must be a $1,000 designer pizza, created by a celebrity chef. It's so yummy and delicious that it's taking forever to finnish it.  |

Kate stark
891
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:07:00 -
[1507] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:Deka Ekato wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. Post 107, on 10/10/2013. Seems CCP are still out, too busy eating their pizza.  OMG, this must be a $1,000 designer pizza, created by a celebrity chef. It's so yummy and delicious that it's taking forever to finnish it. 
heston's never ending gobstopper pizza. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
221
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:55:00 -
[1508] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Sure with the expansion coming out and everybody busy with eating pizza, one can't expect a prompt and thorough answer, ...
Or any answer at all, for that matter.
That had better be the best pizza in the history of Italian cuisine!
I started this a while back. At this point, I don't know that a survey would do any good; I was more interested in at least provoking some sort of response, or at least an acknowledgement that we are still waiting to hear from them. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
958
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:32:00 -
[1509] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:can someone please write a mittani article or something
Already been done. ;) |

Kate stark
892
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:47:00 -
[1510] - Quote
and ccp can't even manage a forum post. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Rachel Prime
Dynaco Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:47:00 -
[1511] - Quote
Is it true that in the cargo holds of the ishukone scorps somers crew recieved there were cybernetic crotch pieces so they could ram the community more effeciently?
|

JC Anderson
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
958
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:50:00 -
[1512] - Quote
Rachel Prime wrote:Is it true that in the cargo holds of the ishukone scorps somers crew recieved there were cybernetic crotch pieces so they could ram the community more effeciently?
Yes, this is correct. Tech 2. |

Karak Terrel
Frarn Ore Transportation
487
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 00:08:00 -
[1513] - Quote
Looks like they think this is over. It isn't. |

TigerXtrm
Black Thorne Corporation Black Thorne Alliance
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 00:11:00 -
[1514] - Quote
Karak Terrel wrote:Looks like they think this is over. It isn't.
It so is.
But please keep clinging on to that shimmer of hope, it's very amusing  My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things! |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
117
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 06:14:00 -
[1515] - Quote
Still, nothing from CCP.  |

Kate stark
892
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 06:22:00 -
[1516] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:Still, nothing from CCP. 
we didn't get a reply when it was a sticky.
there's literally 0 chance of a reply now it's not a sticky and being brushed under the carpet like nothing happened. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
316
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 06:40:00 -
[1517] - Quote
and back to the top... it don't need to be sticky... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Shai 'Hulud
184
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 07:10:00 -
[1518] - Quote
CCP trying to sweep it under the rug is an admission that the "vocal minority" is actually a subset of the majority. For them to make official announcements, do polls, etc., would be to shine a much brighter light on the issue than we can by posting on the forum. All the sand has blown away... now it's just a box. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2145
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 07:49:00 -
[1519] - Quote
I find it more teling that they don't even come up with a half hearted apology, like "Sorry we missed that light black area monetization scheme when we audited Somer. Fixed that now, put regulations in and won't let it happen again." would go at least some way to mend the damaged relation of trust. But nothing at all? Maybe there is some dissent on the matter internally that we can't ever hear about. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Ace Boogi
Republic University Minmatar Republic
221
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 08:17:00 -
[1520] - Quote
maybe Somer and CCP will surprise us by announcing they will personally match all player contributions to the plex for good campaign. considering the amount of isk they gave out during their cashout plus the fact they have cut down on their celebration giveaways, i'm sure they could afford this and not only would it help repair their public image but it would actually benefit people in real life and possibly even save some people from death or serious illness. this would do a lot towards restoring the image of Somer as a 'community service' that gives back rather than just taking and would be a good step towards reconciliation. |
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2639
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 11:04:00 -
[1521] - Quote
This entire thing is disgraceful, especially the attempt to just brush it all under the rug and not address or reply to anything.
Don't expect a penny from me ever again, CCP. |

MestariBation
Fistful of Finns Bearf0rce One
41
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 11:16:00 -
[1522] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:So, I just used my reverse imbursed PLEX to check on my favourite game I'm not subscribed to, checking if the new expansion added something for my play style and I find that it no longer matters really.
The quality of the game no longer means anything when CCP disqualifies itself as a company worth supporting with money. And with their treatment of the matter laid out in this thread, they went a long way towards disqualifying themselves. Sure with the expansion coming out and everybody busy with eating pizza, one can't expect a prompt and thorough answer, though I do wonder what those $2.5 million the PR budged was bumped up with are actually used for.
Thinking about that made me a bit angry, considering you could hire a good 100 level designers for $2.5 mil, who could each do one level per week, amounting to 4800 new levels for missions, anomalies and locations. Instead we get a %2.5 mil pizza.
So with that I doubt I'd go for another PLEX even if I'd find something to do in my solo player non-combatant industrialist niche. But they do make funny videos, right? Send me isk im poor |

Toshiro Ozuwara
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
293
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 11:17:00 -
[1523] - Quote
To be honest, I never cared about this in the first place.
CCP isn't ethical? Who cares? I never expected them to be.
CCP isn't fair? EVE ISNT FAIR. DEAL WITH IT.
Some people managed to cleverly RMT with CCP's implicit blessing? Good for them.
You want a response from CCP? They dont care about what you care about. They are daring you to quit playing. Have you quit yet? Have you pointlessly shot some imaginary space monument in Jita yet? We teach ruthlessness and hazing. No blues. Kill everything.
In-game channel - Join Sniggwaffe |

MestariBation
Fistful of Finns Bearf0rce One
41
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 11:19:00 -
[1524] - Quote
LETS EAT SOME PIZZA Send me isk im poor |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
535
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 17:05:00 -
[1525] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:To be honest, I never cared about this in the first place.
CCP isn't ethical? Who cares? I never expected them to be.
CCP isn't fair? EVE ISNT FAIR. DEAL WITH IT.
Some people managed to cleverly RMT with CCP's implicit blessing? Good for them.
You want a response from CCP? They dont care about what you care about. They are daring you to quit playing. Have you quit yet? Have you pointlessly shot some imaginary space monument in Jita yet?
Funnily enough, they acted in the same manner with regards to the rollout of Incarna. It was amazing how quickly their tune changed when they saw that the "very predictable feedback" had consequences that directly impacted them. |

Karak Terrel
Frarn Ore Transportation
487
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 18:28:00 -
[1526] - Quote
TigerXtrm wrote:Karak Terrel wrote:Looks like they think this is over. It isn't. It so is. But please keep clinging on to that shimmer of hope, it's very amusing  My last hope died a long time ago, this is pure bitterness. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
316
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 18:44:00 -
[1527] - Quote
Ace Boogi wrote: this would do a lot towards restoring the image of Somer as a 'community service'
Actually, no, it wouldn't.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
892
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 19:24:00 -
[1528] - Quote
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:To be honest, I never cared about this in the first place.
CCP isn't ethical? Who cares? I never expected them to be.
CCP isn't fair? EVE ISNT FAIR. DEAL WITH IT.
Some people managed to cleverly RMT with CCP's implicit blessing? Good for them.
You want a response from CCP? They dont care about what you care about. They are daring you to quit playing. Have you quit yet? Have you pointlessly shot some imaginary space monument in Jita yet?
obviously, the people posting about it care. hell, you cared enough to post you didn't care which means you do care.
eve not being fair is a fact i accept when i pay my monthly subscription based on the fact that we're all given the same tools yet people make their own advantages. not that those advantages are given to them by a benevolent third party of which i do not have the same access to. do you understand why that irks people when they are paying money for eve?
yes, we want a response hence why we're going to keep this thread alive. we don't want to quit; that's the entire point. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

gargars
Cohesion Inc Beyond-Repair
110
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 20:28:00 -
[1529] - Quote
CCP someone accidentally 'unstickied' this thread. Please rectify that mistake thanks.  |

Kate stark
893
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 23:11:00 -
[1530] - Quote
gargars wrote:CCP someone accidentally 'unstickied' this thread. Please rectify that mistake thanks. 
unfortunately it wasn't an accident. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
45
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 09:17:00 -
[1531] - Quote
Id love to know what people think inside CCP.
I wonder if the consensus is genuinely that our reasoned points are worthless and flawed, and that all the in game meddling and RMT favouritism with Somer blink was fair?
I mean on one hand they have cracked down on Somer at least to a certain extent. This means that there is a group of employees inside CCP that are reasonable and on our side.
On the other hand, CCP unofficial policy certainly seems to be to snub all of us that have posted a complaint in this thread, and to deviously win the debate by banning all ancillary threads, and unstickying this thread so it dies out. This means there are employees inside CCP that are antagonistic to its PAYING CUSTOMER BASE.
All this for the want of a simple apology.

|

RAW23
521
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 09:29:00 -
[1532] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote: This means there are employees inside CCP that are antagonistic to its PAYING CUSTOMER BASE.
The truth of this was evident long ago. They hired Sreegs and then let him post  There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Karak Terrel
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
487
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 10:21:00 -
[1533] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote: I mean on one hand they have cracked down on Somer at least to a certain extent. This means that there is a group of employees inside CCP that are reasonable and on our side.
They didn't even comment/communicate that, or did they? |

Oz Callaway
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 10:43:00 -
[1534] - Quote
Just making sure that this stays at the top, it's important that everyone who frequents these forums sees this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
46
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 11:25:00 -
[1535] - Quote
Just to summarise, for those that are new to this, CCP has given Somerblink:
-CCP vouches to protect its reputation -CCP advertisement to help it beat its competitors -not 1, not 10, not 20 but THIRTY 15B isk ships spawned as presents -A special relationship that includes skype contact -Ability to break the EULA and sell isk for real money -Bonus 7 days to sell isk for real money after players forced it to end -A variety of the most insanely rare and valuable ships and items to lottery out as prizes in its eve business -The reasoning for all of the above is that Somer's lottery operation is apparently a 'community hub' and they need help to keep providing content
And to top it all off, CCP is snubbing this thread by not replying to it at all, and unstickying it so that maybe it will just die out. Basically an underhand propaganda tactic to protect itself and to protect its close friend Somer. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
318
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 13:05:00 -
[1536] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Just to summarise, for those that are new to this, CCP has given Somerblink:
-CCP vouches to protect its reputation -CCP advertisement to help it beat its competitors -not 1, not 10, not 20 but THIRTY 15B isk ships spawned as presents -A special relationship that includes skype contact -Ability to break the EULA and sell isk for real money -Bonus 7 days to sell isk for real money after players forced it to end -A variety of the most insanely rare and valuable ships and items to lottery out as prizes in its eve business -The reasoning for all of the above is that Somer's lottery operation is apparently a 'community hub' and they need help to keep providing content
And to top it all off, CCP is snubbing this thread by not replying to it at all, and unstickying it so that maybe it will just die out. Basically an underhand propaganda tactic to protect itself and to protect its close friend Somer.
For some reason I am reminded of Chief Clancy Wiggum shouting "Nothing to see here", while a large firework factory explodes behind him :p
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
895
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 15:38:00 -
[1537] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Id love to know what people think inside CCP. I wonder if the consensus is genuinely that our reasoned points are worthless and flawed, and that all the in game meddling and RMT favouritism with Somer blink was fair? I mean on one hand they have cracked down on Somer at least to a certain extent. This means that there is a group of employees inside CCP that are reasonable and on our side. On the other hand, CCP unofficial policy certainly seems to be to snub all of us that have posted a complaint in this thread, and to deviously win the debate by banning all ancillary threads, and unstickying this thread so it dies out. This means there are employees inside CCP that are antagonistic to its PAYING CUSTOMER BASE. All this for the want of a simple apology.
actually they didn't clamp down on somer at all, they clamped down on every one imitating somer and somer were just unfortunate collateral. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
456
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 17:32:00 -
[1538] - Quote
no response in over a month, and now people are saying the Stratios Emergency Responder was a Somer giveaway. Why can't I delete this signature? |

Twitchy Hakaari
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:26:00 -
[1539] - Quote
It's weird that you guys are still talking about this, is there not some kind of medication or something to help your obsessive minds. It's pretty annoying.
|

Kate stark
895
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:34:00 -
[1540] - Quote
Twitchy Hakaari wrote:It's weird that you guys are still talking about this, is there not some kind of medication or something to help your obsessive minds. It's pretty annoying.
what do you do when you have an unresolved issue with a product? pretend it's fine even when it's not?
ccp opened this thread themselves, for feedback, and then abandoned it. we're irritated that they've neither addressed the issue, or given us an update.
a 30 second post saying "we're still looking in to it" would have been fine, that's all we wanted. however that hasn't been the case.
also, if it's that annoying don't open the thread. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Mr R4nd0m
Retribution.
115
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:51:00 -
[1541] - Quote
This has yet again got a little out of hand tbh. They few in the community just stir things up AKA trouble causers.
These are just jealous people that threw their dummy out because they didnt get something. Plain and simple. SOMER do a lot of things for the community, they have free giveaways, promotions etc and in fact they are promoting Eve, even if for their own benefit also.
So why shouldn't CCP give them some rewards, why? I think its good that CCP actually does reward people who stand out in the eve community.
CCP giving away these items, affects me, or you or anyone else in game in NO WAY at all. You are just pretending it does. How is CCP giving away a Scorp going to affect you or me? Its not, not at all. Its just goes in the pot with all the thousands of others ships and items, that don't affect you.
I know some ex Bob guys that have 20,30 T2 BPO's i thought damn, i wish i had those and yes felt a little resentment that i could and would never get them. But will they ever affect my game? no...
Honestly i am tired of seeing this community act like spoilt kids and then CCP has to wipe their asses and then it just spoils the whole thing completely. |

Kate stark
895
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:54:00 -
[1542] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:These are just jealous people that threw their dummy out because they didnt get something. Plain and simple.
oh look. someone that read 0 of the 75 pages, and posted anyway. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Tron 3K
Ship Spinning Industries
166
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:55:00 -
[1543] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:This has yet again got a little out of hand tbh. They few in the community just stir things up AKA trouble causers.
These are just jealous people that threw their dummy out because they didnt get something. Plain and simple. SOMER do a lot of things for the community, they have free giveaways, promotions etc and in fact they are promoting Eve, even if for their own benefit also.
So why shouldn't CCP give them some rewards, why? I think its good that CCP actually does reward people who stand out in the eve community.
CCP giving away these items, affects me, or you or anyone else in game in NO WAY at all. You are just pretending it does. How is CCP giving away a Scorp going to affect you or me? Its not, not at all. Its just goes in the pot with all the thousands of others ships and items, that don't affect you.
I know some ex Bob guys that have 20,30 T2 BPO's i thought damn, i wish i had those and yes felt a little resentment that i could and would never get them. But will they ever affect my game? no...
Honestly i am tired of seeing this community act like spoilt kids and then CCP has to wipe their asses and then it just spoils the whole thing completely.
They do it to make money, they do the giveaways to make their name known so people go spend money...... (go back to beggining of sentence) |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
231
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 18:56:00 -
[1544] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:
All this for the want of a simple apology.
An apology, yes; however after all this, I don't think anything "simple" is going to cut it. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2168
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:05:00 -
[1545] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:
All this for the want of a simple apology.
An apology, yes; however after all this, I don't think anything "simple" is going to cut it. An explenaition would be... interesting. This behaviour looks out of order. I am worried that something is going very wrong inside the bowels of CCP. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Cyrus Alabel
Penumbra Institute
84
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:09:00 -
[1546] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:Dark Magni wrote:
All this for the want of a simple apology.
An apology, yes; however after all this, I don't think anything "simple" is going to cut it. An explenaition would be... interesting. This behaviour looks out of order. I am worried that something is going very wrong inside the bowels of CCP.
"Something very wrong" being "CCP is looking at staving off some debts next year". |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
118
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:22:00 -
[1547] - Quote
Bump !!!
Deka Ekato wrote:So, that's it............ In the sense of achieving in Eve, it's "GAME OVER" No matter how much teritory you hold, how much ISK / wealth you earn and have, or how many killmails you gain, no matter how famous / infamous you become, no matter how large the heist, no matter how much tears you extract, NO ONE will ever be able to surpass Somer's achievement. Somer has effectively WON Eve, for they have achieved the ultimate. Somer has managed to make real money off CCP's intelectual property and get away with doing so. 
|

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
318
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 19:57:00 -
[1548] - Quote
Cyrus Alabel wrote: "Something very wrong" being "CCP is looking at staving off some debts next year".
It does make you wonder if there is some desperation about something, somewhere. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
50
|
Posted - 2013.11.22 23:46:00 -
[1549] - Quote
I think we deserve a response.
I still want to know why Somerblink has received so much CCP support. CCP shouldn't be supporting any in game competing entities....
Am I right? |

Karak Terrel
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
488
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 02:23:00 -
[1550] - Quote
Mr R4nd0m wrote:I know some ex Bob guys that have 20,30 T2 BPO's i thought damn, i wish i had those and yes felt a little resentment that i could and would never get them. But will they ever affect my game? no... Forum trolling was not effected? ok? |
|

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
319
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 09:07:00 -
[1551] - Quote
cant let it fall off the first page Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
897
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 10:41:00 -
[1552] - Quote
it's sad that we've now got to resort to bumping the thread in hopes of getting a reply that should have been made more than a month ago. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
28
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 15:35:00 -
[1553] - Quote
I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. |

Kate stark
899
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 15:48:00 -
[1554] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore.
what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
321
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 16:01:00 -
[1555] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care.
The CSM should be demanding answers.
By not doing so, they have shown themselves to be impotent and pointless.
Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog
B.L.U.E L.A.S.E.R.
233
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 16:03:00 -
[1556] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Twitchy Hakaari wrote:It's weird that you guys are still talking about this, is there not some kind of medication or something to help your obsessive minds. It's pretty annoying.
what do you do when you have an unresolved issue with a product? pretend it's fine even when it's not? ccp opened this thread themselves, for feedback, and then abandoned it. we're irritated that they've neither addressed the issue, or given us an update. a 30 second post saying "we're still looking in to it" would have been fine, that's all we wanted. however that hasn't been the case. also, if it's that annoying don't open the thread.
That dude is a sheep. There are many sheep around, and they all think they are special.
Honestly just ignore 'em :) I am not an alt of Chribba. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
322
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 16:08:00 -
[1557] - Quote
After Incarna and the T20 scandal, Hilmar Veigar P+¬tursson said:
"The estrangement from CCP that many of you have been feeling of late is my fault, and for that I am truly sorry," he began. "In short, my zeal for pushing EVE to her true potential made me lose sight of doing the simple things right. I was impatient when I should have been cautious, defiant when I should have been conciliatory and arrogant when I should have been humble.GÇ¥
So the question is, did he not mean a single word of that, or has he so quickly forgotten the lesson and slipped back into defiance and arrogance?
Until he actually speaks to us - his customers, I am forced to conclude the latter. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
899
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 16:08:00 -
[1558] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Kate stark wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care. The CSM should be demanding answers. By not doing so, they have shown themselves to be impotent and pointless.
they're too busy thinking up ideas for deployables.
which was kinda funny when CCP paradox posted on reddit that when we were asked for ideas [for deployables] we should give them feed back.
i think this thread adequately sums up why there's really no incentive to give CCP feedback; they just ignore it and it's a waste of both their and our time. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.23 22:36:00 -
[1559] - Quote
May as well just save the link to this thread guys.
This thread is dead, and CCP has killed it and snubbed all our feedback completely.
Just remember it, it is all we can do. |

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
30
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 01:58:00 -
[1560] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care.
They promised us at least a survey. Besides that, isn't the CSM an "independent" group whom can share its opinion about this farce? |
|

Nicolai Serkanner
Brave Newbies Inc. Brave Collective
30
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 02:00:00 -
[1561] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
i think this thread adequately sums up why there's really no incentive to give CCP feedback; they just ignore it and it's a waste of both their and our time.
Yeah, I am afraid you're right.
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 07:27:00 -
[1562] - Quote
Bump.
Deka Ekato wrote:CCP Guard wrote:I'm taking a dinner break. Going home for pizza and then I'll check in again! Thanks for the responses so far. Post 107, on 10/10/2013. Seems CCP are still out, too busy eating their pizza. 
|

Kate stark
900
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 08:17:00 -
[1563] - Quote
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:Kate stark wrote:
i think this thread adequately sums up why there's really no incentive to give CCP feedback; they just ignore it and it's a waste of both their and our time.
Yeah, I am afraid you're right.
i wish i wasn't :( Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
325
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 08:48:00 -
[1564] - Quote
Ignoring this thread is not consequence free.
I have drawn conclusions about Hilmar from this action.
I suspect I am not the only one.
Some people have closed accounts over it - but that is not the only possible protest.
I wonder how many people are now refusing to buy PLEX? Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
325
|
Posted - 2013.11.24 21:24:00 -
[1565] - Quote
and back to the front page Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corp's standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

KIller Wabbit
The Scope Gallente Federation
477
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 01:46:00 -
[1566] - Quote
Didn't the CSM update us recently on this?
CCP Punkturis-á "I want to get in on the goodposter circle jerk!"
|

Kate stark
906
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 06:28:00 -
[1567] - Quote
KIller Wabbit wrote:Didn't the CSM update us recently on this?
source or it didn't happen. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2642
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 10:10:00 -
[1568] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Kate stark wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care. The CSM should be demanding answers. By not doing so, they have shown themselves to be impotent and pointless.
Well there's two very good reasons the CSM aren't up in arms over this.
1) CCP won't respond to them anyway. After going out of their way to hide all this from the CSM, do you think they'd give them any meaningful feedback to this? At best they'd get bland "we'll look into it" garbage
2) They don't want to be too hostile towards, or cause too much trouble for, the people who are giving them a small feeling of being "inside the circle". They like their relationship with CCP, they won't want to be seen as troublemakers, or as pesky, persistent and loud critics. CCP decide which of the CSM get cool trips to Iceland, after all.
2 is incredibly cynical but it definitely plays into it to some degree, it's simply human nature. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
449
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 12:32:00 -
[1569] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:The Legendary Soldier wrote:Kate stark wrote:Nicolai Serkanner wrote:I find it worrisome that besides CCP also the CSM doesn't post a single response anymore. what can they say? ccp clearly don't give a toss and aren't interested so it's not like the CSM have any news for us even if they did care. The CSM should be demanding answers. By not doing so, they have shown themselves to be impotent and pointless. Well there's two very good reasons the CSM aren't up in arms over this. 1) CCP won't respond to them anyway. After going out of their way to hide all this from the CSM, do you think they'd give them any meaningful feedback to this? At best they'd get bland "we'll look into it" garbage 2) They don't want to be too hostile towards, or cause too much trouble for, the people who are giving them a small feeling of being "inside the circle". They like their relationship with CCP, they won't want to be seen as troublemakers, or as pesky, persistent and loud critics. CCP decide which of the CSM get cool trips to Iceland, after all. 2 is incredibly cynical but it definitely plays into it to some degree, it's simply human nature.
Or maybe they have been bought off as well ? |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2207
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:10:00 -
[1570] - Quote
Mra Rednu wrote: Or maybe they have been bought off as well ? Pizza! Pizza for everyone! Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
|

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
285
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:17:00 -
[1571] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:Mra Rednu wrote: Or maybe they have been bought off as well ? Pizza! Pizza for everyone! Didn't PIZZA disband a couple of weeks ago?
|

IDGAD
Get in the van I have candy.
43
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:55:00 -
[1572] - Quote
This has got to be the longest Pizza party in the world. |

Daquaris
The Loathsome Lions
66
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 14:59:00 -
[1573] - Quote
Good luck getting a reply! |

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
104
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 15:02:00 -
[1574] - Quote
Can someone remind me what the problem was?  .
|

Jarod Garamonde
Sardaukar Merc Guild General Tso's Alliance
766
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 15:15:00 -
[1575] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: (message truncated) ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Shame on everyone who made a federal case out of this issue.
I'd said all along that the only thing CCP did wrong was not paying attention to how such a thing would be recieved by the playerbase. I've also said all along that this wasn't really nearly as big a deal as it was made out to be by the vocal minority.
I think clarifying it should bring closure to the entire matter. Hopefully, this should be the end of the entire issue. That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right... |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
328
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 15:27:00 -
[1576] - Quote
I received a warning today, for one of my posts in this thread.
That was the final straw.
Three accounts closed. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
450
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 17:16:00 -
[1577] - Quote
Jarod Garamonde wrote:CCP Guard wrote: (message truncated) ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
Shame on everyone who made a federal case out of this issue. I'd said all along that the only thing CCP did wrong was not paying attention to how such a thing would be recieved by the playerbase. I've also said all along that this wasn't really nearly as big a deal as it was made out to be by the vocal minority. I think clarifying it should bring closure to the entire matter. Hopefully, this should be the end of the entire issue.
Then you do not understand the issue. |

Tor Saani
Arcana Imperii Ltd. Surely You're Joking
12
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 17:46:00 -
[1578] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
CCP! You guys are doing great! Keep up the fantastic work making the game we all love. Ignore all the goons and CFC pets, they are only happy when they are complaining about something. Somer was a great community site. You guys made the right decision to reward Somer. |

Kate stark
906
|
Posted - 2013.11.25 18:16:00 -
[1579] - Quote
Tor Saani wrote:CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable. CCP! You guys are doing great! Keep up the fantastic work making the game we all love. Ignore all the goons and CFC pets, they are only happy when they are complaining about something. Somer was a great community site. You guys made the right decision to reward Somer.
nobody is questioning that rewarding community sites is cool. we're just pointing out they did it in the most ass backwards and ******** way possible, and when imitated the rules were changed; so are you sure they were such a good community site? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
54
|
Posted - 2013.11.26 11:37:00 -
[1580] - Quote
Somer has CCP jumping through hoops.
Unacceptable. |
|

Kate stark
907
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 06:21:00 -
[1581] - Quote
So we're still being ignored? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Callista Coren
Elixa
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 06:57:00 -
[1582] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:So we're still being ignored?
Yes we are.
Arrogantly, and defiantly...
http://massively.joystiq.com/2011/10/05/ccp-games-ceo-issues-letter-of-apology-to-eve-online-players/ |

Frying Doom
3410
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 07:32:00 -
[1583] - Quote
Quote:We will keep you updated on our progress every step of the way because, as Hilmar said, communication is one of the things we are dedicated to improve. Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
Senior Producer of EVE Online
source: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/2428
Yeah this thread shows how seriously they took the whole Incarna debacle. Their communication is so much better on issues now  Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GreenSeed
753
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 10:40:00 -
[1584] - Quote
what the hell is it that you people want? can you point at it and say "hey CCP could you do 'this', please?"
do you want an apology? for what?, CCP did nothing wrong, if anything you should ask the people responsible at somer to apologize for abusing gifts, instead of doing the moral thing and turning them down. do you want CCP to sue the people responsible at SOMER for profiting out of their product without authorization, with he whole timecode thing? they already decided they wont do that, so who do you think you are? you think that bumping this stupid thread over and over will somehow coerce a privately held corporation to submit to your childish will?
internet hippies, worst kind of hippies.
they wont cave, they already decided they wont go after SOMER, and everything is business as usual again. now give it a rest already, you are annoying, your demands are annoying, your sensitivity is annoying and worst of all you are not even right to expect them fulfilled.
grow up. |

Callista Coren
Elixa
0
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 18:05:00 -
[1585] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:what the hell is it that you people want? can you point at it and say "hey CCP could you do 'this', please?"
they wont cave, they already decided they wont go after SOMER, and everything is business as usual again. now give it a rest already, you are annoying, your demands are annoying, your sensitivity is annoying and worst of all you are not even right to expect them fulfilled.
grow up.
I believe you mean "you're annoying", but for the moment, let's pretend you made sense...
Until recently I have paid CCP for a service, and this forum is provided for discussion of that service.
I, and others, believe that having paid CCP money for that service we are entitled to an explanation of why they failed to enforce their own EULA, and what they will do to ensure it doesnt happen again.
In the light of the Incarna/t20 episode where Hilmar cried crocodile tears and promised it wouldnt happen again, I think it is perfectly fair for people to want to highlight this incident and question whether Hilmar/CCP REALLY learned the lesson of incarna.
The fact that this thread has been studiously ignored would suggest that they have not, and the 78 pages of posts, would suggest that the players (paying CUSTOMERS) are not happy about it.
You on the other hand just appear to want to scream at people and toss your toys out of your pram with no real justification.
If you want to see annoying - try looking in the mirror.
If you find this thread annoying - don't read it, no one is forcing you.
And CCP. Grow some balls and talk to us. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3551
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 18:28:00 -
[1586] - Quote
If you don't like it, leave.
|

Bookish
Exodus Development
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 18:38:00 -
[1587] - Quote
i used to watch this thread everydays, waiting for a CCP answer. now I watch it once a week, unfortunately with same no-response. i only wish i could treat my clients in the same way... just ignore them... what a wonderful world!
|

Ghost Phius
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
162
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 18:45:00 -
[1588] - Quote
CCP repeatedly shows a lack of integrity on this issue. A shame since Hilmar's actions do not match his words. |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
330
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 18:54:00 -
[1589] - Quote
Anslo wrote:If you don't like it, leave.
I assume you are comprehension challenged, as the post you replied to did state
"Until recently I paid CCP for a service..."
Accounts have certainly been closed, however, that is the last sanction available, and does not mean we cannot try and force CCP to pretend it has some integrity... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
907
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:13:00 -
[1590] - Quote
Anslo wrote:If you don't like it, leave.
we've addressed this point several times. perhaps you'd like to read the thread before adding your 'contribution'. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3552
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:27:00 -
[1591] - Quote
My point stands. You don't like the company, stop paying it. It's that simple. Otherwise you 'forcing' the company to do anything is just over zealous whistle blowing a lot of people don't care about.
Your reasons and multipage justification for having a moan are irrelevant. If you are unhappy, stop posting, stop logging in, unsub everything, and leave. Otherwise, you're just here for the attention.
|

Kate stark
907
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:30:00 -
[1592] - Quote
Anslo wrote:My point stands.
no it doesn't, read the thread to find out why. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5267
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:42:00 -
[1593] - Quote
this thread fails to deliver again
the ccp/csm response that is There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Ghost Phius
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
162
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:43:00 -
[1594] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Otherwise, you're just here for the attention.
Obviously looking in the mirror. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
592

|
Posted - 2013.11.27 19:43:00 -
[1595] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents. ISD Ezwal Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
458
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:08:00 -
[1596] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil! The rules:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
I say while you're here you couldn't give a CCP dude a nudge to give a reply ?
|

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
1145
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:09:00 -
[1597] - Quote
Ranting is Magic High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Leigh Akiga
Trickle Down Economics
360
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:10:00 -
[1598] - Quote
I too, watch this thread weekly looking for a response as to why a handful of players get/got to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from a video game.
This part from Guards original post seems a bit off as well.."For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors"
That pause didnt last too long as it seems they immediately gave Somer another priceless item that isnt even ingame yet starting at half a trillion to drive visitors to the Somer site and crush all competitors. What gives??
We get nothing but a wall of silence.. |

Kate stark
907
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:26:00 -
[1599] - Quote
Leigh Akiga wrote:I too, watch this thread weekly looking for a response as to why a handful of players get/got to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from a video game. This part from Guards original post seems a bit off as well.."For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors" That pause didnt last too long as it seems they immediately gave Somer another priceless item that isnt even ingame yet starting at half a trillion to drive visitors to the Somer site and crush all competitors. What gives?? We get nothing but a wall of silence..
well i guess that solves where it comes from which is all i hear when it gets mentioned in a chat channel.
oh dear. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
The McCandless Clan Turing Tested
1148
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:33:00 -
[1600] - Quote
"Priceless and Worthless mean the same thing on the Frontier "
- Rafe Zetter High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |
|

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
517
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 20:49:00 -
[1601] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil! The rules:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
well, when you post the same complaints and same issues over and over again because of a complete lack of dev attention, appropriate communications start to look like ranting. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Slappy Andven
Proletariat Projects Inc SoulWing Alliance
17
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 21:00:00 -
[1602] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Quote:We will keep you updated on our progress every step of the way because, as Hilmar said, communication is one of the things we are dedicated to improve. Arnar Hrafn Gylfason
Senior Producer of EVE Online
source: http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/2428Yeah this thread shows how seriously they took the whole Incarna debacle. Their communication is so much better on issues now 
Communicating better does not equal capitulating to your demands. They have given the response they felt was appropriate. If they come back again, and still tell you, essentially, 'no', what then is accomplished? Nothing. Nor does it look like they are going to change their mind, and I'm completely GOOD with that.
Vote with your feet, if you must. For the rest of us, game on, problem solved, and stop whining. Thanks.
---á Slappy Andven CEO Proletariat Projects, Inc. Executor, SoulWing Alliance |

Batelle
Komm susser Tod
517
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 21:03:00 -
[1603] - Quote
Slappy Andven wrote:
Communicating better does not equal capitulating to your demands. They have given the response they felt was appropriate. If they come back again, and still tell you, essentially, 'no', what then is accomplished? Nothing. Nor does it look like they are going to change their mind, and I'm completely GOOD with that.
Vote with your feet, if you must. For the rest of us, game on, problem solved, and stop whining. Thanks.
No, they said they would put the program on hold and come back when they have some better-defined guidelines in place for how the rewards program should work. That in and of itself is not an answer, its a promise to come up with a solution later. "CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |

Kate stark
907
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 21:17:00 -
[1604] - Quote
Batelle wrote:Slappy Andven wrote:
Communicating better does not equal capitulating to your demands. They have given the response they felt was appropriate. If they come back again, and still tell you, essentially, 'no', what then is accomplished? Nothing. Nor does it look like they are going to change their mind, and I'm completely GOOD with that.
Vote with your feet, if you must. For the rest of us, game on, problem solved, and stop whining. Thanks.
No, they said they would put the program on hold and come back when they have some better-defined guidelines in place for how the rewards program should work. That in and of itself is not an answer, its a promise to come up with a solution later.
not to mention they said there would be some surveys which never materalised.
we asked for an update (y'know, some communication). we didn't make a demand. they simply ignored us.
oh, and then they just carried on like this never happened and gave somer a blue stratios thing to give away apparently. not that any one should be surprised by this. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Melissa Morada
Elixa
4
|
Posted - 2013.11.27 21:19:00 -
[1605] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:I have removed a rule breaking post and the one quoting it. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil! The rules:3. Ranting is prohibited.
A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.
I am assuming that my post was "the one quoting it".
I understand that the rules do not permit discussion of moderation.
How does one complain about moderation decisions?
|

Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
110
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 01:18:00 -
[1606] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: oh, and then they just carried on like this never happened and gave somer a blue stratios thing to give away apparently. not that any one should be surprised by this.
3-5 of them. Two winners had the choice of a holiday to Iceland . .
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5268
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 03:04:00 -
[1607] - Quote
Elizabeth Norn wrote:Kate stark wrote: oh, and then they just carried on like this never happened and gave somer a blue stratios thing to give away apparently. not that any one should be surprised by this.
3-5 of them. Two winners had the choice of a holiday to Iceland  . oh, so they went back and made sure to give blink some special stuff to give away that wasn't a navy vexxor
awesome, good to see no one noticed There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Leigh Akiga
Trickle Down Economics
360
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 03:10:00 -
[1608] - Quote
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain |

Kate stark
910
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 06:39:00 -
[1609] - Quote
Evidently ccp don't understand, or care, about the issue that has generated nearly 160 posts of feedback across various threads. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2243
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 10:14:00 -
[1610] - Quote
MY cynical me could say that CCP were lucky they had that typhoon to run the PLEX for good campaign over to cover SOMER up with positive publicity but that one is an *******, so I rather not. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2643
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 10:48:00 -
[1611] - Quote
I wish my sub would hurry up and run out. I don't want ccp to get the impression that I'm still part of their game after all of this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
54
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 11:18:00 -
[1612] - Quote
Is it against the rules to set up a 'unsub protest' thread? |

The Legendary Soldier
Ore for Glory
330
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 17:58:00 -
[1613] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Is it against the rules to set up a 'unsub protest' thread?
Even if it is not, it would be locked, probably for being 'redundant to this thread' or for being 'a rant'
 Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1153
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 13:13:00 -
[1614] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I wish my sub would hurry up and run out..
So do we High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
46
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 13:40:00 -
[1615] - Quote
[Tin foil hat] Somer is run by CCP alts. The purpose of blink is to create an ISK sink. You think those Somer people are getting rich? They aren't. All that ISK they get is just going to sit in a giant account and rot.
Isk sink successful.
[/Tin foil hat] |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2247
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 13:49:00 -
[1616] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:[Tin foil hat] Somer is run by CCP alts. The purpose of blink is to create an ISK sink. You think those Somer people are getting rich? They aren't. All that ISK they get is just going to sit in a giant account and rot.
Isk sink successful.
[/Tin foil hat] Also, all the ISk will be used to fill sell orders for PLEXes by CCP alts that were confiscated from RMTers in an attempt to create a fake demand for them to satisfy suits breathing down their necks. The PLEXes then get destroyed via those hilarious frigate kills in Jita. Any PLEXes not ganked that way just go into another frigate in another day.
ISK sink *and* PLEX sink successful, while saving CCP credit rating.
*Good thing I can fit 1600mm Layered Aluminum Plating on this Capsule* Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 16:54:00 -
[1617] - Quote
unsurprisingly there's still no comment from ccp. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
590
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:10:00 -
[1618] - Quote
I too am wondering when there may be a more complete response - especially given that there were issues of developer misconduct, even if not intentional, there should be a more thorough response to this.
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:16:00 -
[1619] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:I too am wondering when there may be a more complete response - especially given that there were issues of developer misconduct, even if not intentional, there should be a more thorough response to this.
right now, even a blank post would be great. at least then they're aware the issue hasn't magically vanished because they stopped posting. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3557
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:22:00 -
[1620] - Quote
Haha still so much entitlement. Can't wait for your subs to run out... Anyway brb playing blink :)
|
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:33:00 -
[1621] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Haha still so much entitlement.
actually, this isn't entitlement. it's a perfectly reasonable quest from a group of paying customers. all we're asking for is an update on the situation. we're not telling ccp what they should or shouldn't be doing.
although we did tell them at the start, because that's the entire purpose of this thread; they asked us for feedback. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3558
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:50:00 -
[1622] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Anslo wrote:Haha still so much entitlement. actually, this isn't entitlement. it's a perfectly reasonable quest from a group of paying customers. all we're asking for is an update on the situation. we're not telling ccp what they should or shouldn't be doing.although we did tell them at the start, because that's the entire purpose of this thread; they asked us for feedback. Yes you are.
Anyway, the thread is unsticked and has run it's course. Your feedback is apparently (and understandably) no longer welcome. This is now nothing but repetitive posting of the same thing, ranting, and should be locked :)
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:55:00 -
[1623] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kate stark wrote:Anslo wrote:Haha still so much entitlement. actually, this isn't entitlement. it's a perfectly reasonable quest from a group of paying customers. all we're asking for is an update on the situation. we're not telling ccp what they should or shouldn't be doing.although we did tell them at the start, because that's the entire purpose of this thread; they asked us for feedback. Yes you are. Anyway, the thread is unsticked and has run it's course. Your feedback is apparently (and understandably) no longer welcome. This is now nothing but repetitive posting of the same thing, ranting, and should be locked :)
no we aren't. it's pretty evident from our posts.
we're not giving feedback, we're asking for it. If you think it's ranting then i guess you should report all the rant posts. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1166
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 19:56:00 -
[1624] - Quote
Where I work
"feedback" this constructive would have been long ago labelled
"Repeat Caller" "No Further Response Required"
and deleted
And in my job, customer feedback is a right protected by law High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:09:00 -
[1625] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kate stark wrote:Anslo wrote:Haha still so much entitlement. actually, this isn't entitlement. it's a perfectly reasonable quest from a group of paying customers. all we're asking for is an update on the situation. we're not telling ccp what they should or shouldn't be doing.although we did tell them at the start, because that's the entire purpose of this thread; they asked us for feedback. Yes you are. Anyway, the thread is unsticked and has run it's course. Your feedback is apparently (and understandably) no longer welcome. This is now nothing but repetitive posting of the same thing, ranting, and should be locked :)
I don't really understand your posts.
Lots of new information is here -- just in the last page people pointed out that SOMER was handed new special Stratios cruisers.
I had no idea that even happened .
I don't really have any "feedback" to offer personally, other than to hope CCP continues to offer explanations justifications to the community on the handing out of "elite" goods to third parties.
If wanting/liking explanations is "entitlement" then I do not feel even slightly guilty for having that label. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1166
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:24:00 -
[1626] - Quote
"Regarding the handing out of prizes for third-party events, weGÇÖve always seen value in providing reasonable prizes to boost interest in events run by enthusiastic and capable players. ThereGÇÖs value in it for us as a company and for you as a community. What constitutes GÇ£reasonableGÇ¥ is always a judgment call that has to do with the history we have with the operator, the scope of the event, and the attention and participation the event can draw. "
Yeah thats *really* hard to understand High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:29:00 -
[1627] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:"Regarding the handing out of prizes for third-party events, weGÇÖve always seen value in providing reasonable prizes to boost interest in events run by enthusiastic and capable players. ThereGÇÖs value in it for us as a company and for you as a community. What constitutes GÇ£reasonableGÇ¥ is always a judgment call that has to do with the history we have with the operator, the scope of the event, and the attention and participation the event can draw. "
Yeah thats *really* hard to understand
You think that's hard to understand?
This one is REALLY hard to understand!!
Quote:For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. We want to carefully consider your feedback and determine what our framework should be and what improvements to the level of transparency are needed so that the rewards program serves its intended purpose of making the EVE Universe a better place |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1166
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:34:00 -
[1628] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:Quote:For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors
1) That was 2 months ago
2) Didnt realise that the word "select" had changed meaning to "all" High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Prince Kobol
1192
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:35:00 -
[1629] - Quote
Dead Horse....
Beating...
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:42:00 -
[1630] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Pinky Hops wrote:Quote:For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors 1) That was 2 months ago 2) Didnt realise that the word "select" had changed meaning to "all"
"select" refers to the recipients, not the distribution of prizes.. so since somer got the new stratios thing. who else were they giving rewards to since it clearly wasn't somer based on that quote.
and "for the time being" is still now, as we've not been told otherwise. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:45:00 -
[1631] - Quote
Prince Kobol wrote:Dead Horse....
Beating...
it was dead a month ago, we're simply asking for the autopsy report. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1166
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:48:00 -
[1632] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:
"select" refers to the recipients, not the distribution of prizes.. so since somer got the new stratios thing. who else were they giving rewards to since it clearly wasn't somer based on that quote.
and "for the time being" is still now, as we've not been told otherwise.
Oh ok so the other Straios that was given away never existed, gotcha
And yeah, I guess you didnt get your special mention in dispatches 
If what you've just written isn't special entitlement and willful ignorance, I have no what is.
Im sure the louder you demand the more likely they are to cave to it
Oh, and the Third-party distributors are NOT recipients. They gain the right to give the item away, they dont get the actual item High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 20:59:00 -
[1633] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote:
"select" refers to the recipients, not the distribution of prizes.. so since somer got the new stratios thing. who else were they giving rewards to since it clearly wasn't somer based on that quote.
and "for the time being" is still now, as we've not been told otherwise.
Oh ok so the other Straios that was given away never existed, gotcha And yeah, I guess you didnt get your special mention in dispatches  If what you've just written isn't special entitlement and willful ignorance, I have no what is. Im sure the louder you demand the more likely they are to cave to it Oh, and the Third-party distributors are NOT recipients. They gain the right to give the item away, they dont get the actual item
the other stratios is irrelevant, stop pretending otherwise.
i'm not making any demands other than an update on what's going on since the last we heard was over a month ago and was basically ccp guard saying "i'm going for dinner" then never coming back.
is it really that bad that we actually want to know what's going on rather than being left with no answer other than "guard had pizza for dinner?"
i actually don't give a **** one way or another how this situation ends, i just want to know the ending.
edit: third party distributors are the recipients. ccp gave it to them, what blink do with it is irrelevant. it was still given to blink, that makes them the recipient. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Cygnet Lythanea
World Welfare Works Association Independent Faction
306
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:00:00 -
[1634] - Quote
My question is: How do I go about creating one of these 'golden' organizations that get given trillions of isk?
The Most Interesting Player In Eve. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3559
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:02:00 -
[1635] - Quote
>I don't have demands >demands an update You deserve nothing. CCP isn't bound to give you any information. You are not a shareholder, you are not an auditor. Get over it. You're a customer. The most you can do is leave. Which we would very much like for you and your entitled whistle blowing compatriots to do very much.
|

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1169
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:02:00 -
[1636] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: the other stratios is irrelevant, stop pretending otherwise.
No it isnt
Its extremely relevant because its existance pretty much disproves your entire premise High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:05:00 -
[1637] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote: the other stratios is irrelevant, stop pretending otherwise.
No it isnt Its extremely relevant because its existance pretty much disproves your entire premise
it is irrelevant, because it doesn't. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:06:00 -
[1638] - Quote
Anslo wrote:>I don't have demands >demands an update You deserve nothing. CCP isn't bound to give you any information. You are not a shareholder, you are not an auditor. Get over it. You're a customer. The most you can do is leave. Which we would very much like for you and your entitled whistle blowing compatriots to do very much.
The amusing thing is; you're doing more complaining than I am.
I haven't demanded anything.
also, this isn't 4chan you don't need to start a line with a > Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1170
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:20:00 -
[1639] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote: the other stratios is irrelevant, stop pretending otherwise.
No it isnt Its extremely relevant because its existance pretty much disproves your entire premise it is irrelevant, because it doesn't.
Saying it doesnt make it so.
Though that does appear to be your strategy overall in this "debate" High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3559
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:20:00 -
[1640] - Quote
Guys I'm not demanding anything except an update from the company who has no obligation to me except for providing a service! Also we're not complaining about you. We're insulting you and showing others how little you matter :)
|
|

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:29:00 -
[1641] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Guys I'm not demanding anything except an update from the company who has no obligation to me except for providing a service! Also we're not complaining about you. We're insulting you and showing others how little you matter :)
i would classify this as a fairly obvious off-topic troll.
if you have nothing to add to the thread other than to insult people, why are you bumping it continuously?
also: fallacious logic about "mattering" - in a statistical sense, an 80 page thread matters, and has some *weight* in terms of community response. so yes, clearly this "matters."
it's certainly not the same 5 people posting in the thread over and over. i've only posted a few times here, and that's probably true of most people, with maybe a few outliers posting a lot. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:30:00 -
[1642] - Quote
it would help if he knew the definition of demanding, it seems he does not. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3559
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:32:00 -
[1643] - Quote
Because I like discrediting loud mouth whistle blowers. Also here's a though; if you don't like it why don't you make something relevant enough to the community to garner a lot of support. Then maybe you'll get stuff to give away. Cause right now, you all complain yet have done NOTHING in the eve community except *****. Much like sov holding, if you want something or don't like that someone has something, act on it and do something to deserve it.
Otherwise, biomass.
|

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1170
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:33:00 -
[1644] - Quote
You mean third.
And it does undermine your premise because it makes it very clear that the pause is no longer in effect.
At least insofar as two groups are concerned.
But then I suppose they are select groups.
Oh wait, but you said that didnt mean what I thought it meant either.
Im afraid you may have to restate your position.
All you have now is a demand to know CCP ingame marketting strategy and I would be very suprised if they felt any reason to make that public knowledge until such a timr as they see fit. High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:38:00 -
[1645] - Quote
Anslo wrote: if you don't like it why don't you make something relevant enough to the community to garner a lot of support. Then maybe you'll get stuff to give away.
I dislike the practice in general, so this argument does not apply to me.
Try another?
Also, this thread exists as far as I know as an attempt for community outreach/comments/opinions
Stepping in at page 80 and telling people their comments/opinions (which was the purpose of the thread) do not matter, is just facepalmingly stupid. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:39:00 -
[1646] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:You mean third.
And it does undermine your premise because it makes it very clear that the pause is no longer in effect.
At least insofar as two groups are concerned.
But then I suppose they are select groups.
Oh wait, but you said that didnt mean what I thought it meant either.
Im afraid you may have to restate your position.
All you have now is a demand to know CCP ingame marketting strategy and I would be very suprised if they felt any reason to make that public knowledge until such a timr as they see fit.
except the pause quite clearly is still in effect; as we've not been told anything to the contrary. it's also quite clear somer were never part of that pause to begin with.
if they had stopped the pause, we'd have been told. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:39:00 -
[1647] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Because I like discrediting loud mouth whistle blowers. Also here's a though; if you don't like it why don't you make something relevant enough to the community to garner a lot of support. Then maybe you'll get stuff to give away. Cause right now, you all complain yet have done NOTHING in the eve community except *****. Much like sov holding, if you want something or don't like that someone has something, act on it and do something to deserve it.
Otherwise, biomass.
i don't want free things. i never did.
if you'd have read even a fraction of the thread you might be able to post something relevant. give it a go. as yet your posts are barely even on topic let alone correct. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1170
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:40:00 -
[1648] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:You mean third.
And it does undermine your premise because it makes it very clear that the pause is no longer in effect.
At least insofar as two groups are concerned.
But then I suppose they are select groups.
Oh wait, but you said that didnt mean what I thought it meant either.
Im afraid you may have to restate your position.
All you have now is a demand to know CCP ingame marketting strategy and I would be very suprised if they felt any reason to make that public knowledge until such a timr as they see fit. except the pause quite clearly is still in effect; as we've not been told anything to the contrary. if they had stopped the pause, we'd have been told.
Why do you assume that? High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:41:00 -
[1649] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:You mean third.
And it does undermine your premise because it makes it very clear that the pause is no longer in effect.
At least insofar as two groups are concerned.
But then I suppose they are select groups.
Oh wait, but you said that didnt mean what I thought it meant either.
Im afraid you may have to restate your position.
All you have now is a demand to know CCP ingame marketting strategy and I would be very suprised if they felt any reason to make that public knowledge until such a timr as they see fit. except the pause quite clearly is still in effect; as we've not been told anything to the contrary. if they had stopped the pause, we'd have been told. Why do you assume that?
because we were never told that somer were part of the pause to begin with. the people for whom the rewards were paused for was never announced. i did just edit my post to illustrate that as you posted. (at least, the part you quoted anyway.) Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2248
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:42:00 -
[1650] - Quote
I don't know what's more stupid: The bottom tier trolls or that people are replying.
Anyway. Locking this thread will yield the same response from CCP as keeping it open. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:45:00 -
[1651] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:I don't know what's more stupid: The bottom tier trolls or that people are replying.
Anyway. Locking this thread will yield the same response from CCP as keeping it open.
but then we can open a new one because new threads wouldn't be duplicates as there's no open thread on the topic! Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1170
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:46:00 -
[1652] - Quote
Wait, so you want to be told when a pause that may or may not be in effect on a group who may or may not be under this possibly over pause ends?
Oh and on items tgat you have bo information on whenthey were issued. Forgot to add that High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:50:00 -
[1653] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Wait, so you want to be told when a pause that may or may not be in effect on a group who may or may not be under this possibly over pause ends?
No.
I'm telling you that you cannot conclude the pause is over by the fact that somer received an in-game reward due to the fact that there's no evidence to suggest that they were part of the pause to begin with. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Remiel Pollard
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
1994
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:51:00 -
[1654] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:Anslo wrote: if you don't like it why don't you make something relevant enough to the community to garner a lot of support. Then maybe you'll get stuff to give away. I dislike the practice in general, so this argument does not apply to me. Try another? Also, this thread exists as far as I know as an attempt for community outreach/comments/opinions Stepping in at page 80 and telling people their comments/opinions (which was the purpose of the thread) do not matter, is just facepalmingly stupid.
Yeah, all those Nobel Science Awards for contributions to science, they're so unfair. Why can't someone who contributed nothing to science get one as well? It's not like it's some kind of incentive to contribute to science or anything. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 21:57:00 -
[1655] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Yeah, all those Nobel Science Awards for contributions to science, they're so unfair. Why can't someone who contributed nothing to science get one as well? It's not like it's some kind of incentive to contribute to science or anything.
Are you comparing a for-profit gambling website to a groundbreaking scientific contribution? And the special edition Battleships to a Nobel Prize?
Impressive. 
Personally, I think the profit of running a successful gambling operation is it's own reward. I don't laud the people who run them. I don't hate them, either.
Certainly I do not think them worthy of any kind of additional reward. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 22:03:00 -
[1656] - Quote
It's irrelevant if we think somer are worthy of reward or not; the method in which they were rewarded is what the thread was spawned from. even if somer were the most benevolent group of players in the game; in-game assets are not a suitable way to reward players. When you are in the game there is an expectation that you're playing with people who have the same tools available to them that you do, not people who have the benevolent hand of ccp dropping things in to their back pocket. However that point has been discussed at length already.
We're just waiting for CCP to give us a survey to fill out. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 22:10:00 -
[1657] - Quote
I propose limited edition memorabilia.
Miniature statues of ships, characters, or items, perhaps out of pewter. There are cheaper substrates as well.
T-shirts, clothing (kind of boring)
Signed posters (GIANT STARMAP?)
More in this vein. |

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 22:10:00 -
[1658] - Quote
yeah, we said all that about 70 pages ago. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
593

|
Posted - 2013.11.29 22:14:00 -
[1659] - Quote
I have removed some rule breaking posts and those quoting them. As always I let some edge cases stay. Please people, keep it on topic and above all civil!
The rules: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another forum user. Posts of this nature are not beneficial to the community spirit that CCP promote and as such they will not be tolerated.
5. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.
The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.
26. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued. ISD Ezwal Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Kate stark
914
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 22:18:00 -
[1660] - Quote
ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2248
|
Posted - 2013.11.29 23:28:00 -
[1661] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. I'll just assume my tinfoilhattery was too close to the truth and it triggered a tar-baby that sucked in all those unrelated posts. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Large Collidable Object
morons.
2360
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 00:32:00 -
[1662] - Quote
Sorry - cba to spend any time on these forums anymore due to Berlusconi'esque fashion CCP decided to handle this issue, but as this has been unstickied, I wondered if someone could point me to the new official thread with CCPs statement on their most significant misconduct to this date.
Thanks in advance. You know... morons. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
3565
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:22:00 -
[1663] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. And that shows how much you matter :) biomass so that CCP can stop having to spend time dealing with whistle blowers and spend more time on developing the game.
Somber made a successful program. They got rewarded. You did nothing and got nothing.
DEAL WITT IT. EITHER MAKE SOMETHING FOR THE COMMUNITY TO EARN THE REWARD TO GIVE OUT TO PEOPLE OR BIOMASS.
|

Frying Doom
3411
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 01:43:00 -
[1664] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kate stark wrote:ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. And that shows how much you matter :) biomass so that CCP can stop having to spend time dealing with whistle blowers and spend more time on developing the game. Somber made a successful program. They got rewarded. You did nothing and got nothing. DEAL WITT IT. EITHER MAKE SOMETHING FOR THE COMMUNITY TO EARN THE REWARD TO GIVE OUT TO PEOPLE OR BIOMASS. Yes they were rewarded in tens of thousands of dollars by a 'redacted' operation and are still being rewarded by being able to still break the EULA.
Your argument is like saying isk sellers do something for the community.
Maybe you should BIOMASS yourself for supporting a 'redacted' business. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

Kate stark
916
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 07:49:00 -
[1665] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kate stark wrote:ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. And that shows how much you matter :) biomass so that CCP can stop having to spend time dealing with whistle blowers and spend more time on developing the game. Somber made a successful program. They got rewarded. You did nothing and got nothing. DEAL WITT IT. EITHER MAKE SOMETHING FOR THE COMMUNITY TO EARN THE REWARD TO GIVE OUT TO PEOPLE OR BIOMASS.
wrong, it shows that volunteer ISDs are also human and make mistakes by deleting posts that don't break the rules.
you've still not read the thread have you? this has nothing to do with who was rewarded, and everything about how they were rewarded.
please read the thread before you "contribute" any more. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Frying Doom
3412
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 08:35:00 -
[1666] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Sorry - cba to spend any time on these forums anymore due to Berlusconi'esque fashion CCP decided to handle this issue, but as this has been unstickied, I wondered if someone could point me to the new official thread with CCPs statement on their most significant misconduct to this date.
Thanks in advance. Sorry all you will find is a post somewhere to say, they messed up and will pause the give away for the moment.
As to the Somer 'redacted' thing and the fact they are still in violation of the EULA, sorry no post about that. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

The Legendary Soldier
OreSum
331
|
Posted - 2013.11.30 22:28:00 -
[1667] - Quote
Anslo wrote:Kate stark wrote:ezwal, ever tried reading posts before you delete them? half of those you deleted didn't break any of those rules.
you know, the ones discussing whether somer were stopped from receiving in-game rewards or not, and the current status on the pause of such rewards. And that shows how much you matter :) biomass so that CCP can stop having to spend time dealing with whistle blowers and spend more time on developing the game. Somber made a successful program. They got rewarded. You did nothing and got nothing. DEAL WITT IT. EITHER MAKE SOMETHING FOR THE COMMUNITY TO EARN THE REWARD TO GIVE OUT TO PEOPLE OR BIOMASS.
How is the above not a rant? Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
916
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 08:25:00 -
[1668] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:How is the above not a rant?
i've actually had a forum ban before for telling some one to biomass themselves. it's a threat as well as a rant. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1179
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 14:12:00 -
[1669] - Quote
Anslo wrote: And that shows how much you matter
Problem is, Im afraid by deleting my posts too they have pretty much said that anyone who defends their decision is also wrong.
While I havent magically decided to agree with Ms Kate, I am concerned about this turn of events High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
918
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 14:47:00 -
[1670] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Anslo wrote: And that shows how much you matter
Problem is, Im afraid by deleting my posts too they have pretty much said that anyone who defends their decision is also wrong. While I havent magically decided to agree with Ms Kate, I am concerned about this turn of events
I'm glad you haven't magically decided to agree with me. Without due discussion there can be no progress. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1182
|
Posted - 2013.12.01 14:59:00 -
[1671] - Quote
Kate stark wrote: I'm glad you haven't magically decided to agree with me. Without due discussion there can be no progress.
My thoughts exactly High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 08:49:00 -
[1672] - Quote
is this some kind of joke? |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1187
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 08:50:00 -
[1673] - Quote
I feel like Ive just had my stomach pumped High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2274
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 09:19:00 -
[1674] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:is this some kind of joke? If it is, it's not funny. Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2648
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:03:00 -
[1675] - Quote
It's ok the ISD are here to clean the place up.
heh
heh
heh |

Brendan Anneto
Dread Phoenix Society Fidelas Constans
4
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 12:58:00 -
[1676] - Quote
Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks, Guard!
Somer Blink does't support the community. They are a Third-Party for profit organisation that was created for the sole purpose of fattening their wallets. all they are is a gambling site. They do not support the community in any way shape or form, except by heping people blow their isk.
Proverbs 1:26-27 |

RAW23
569
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 13:01:00 -
[1677] - Quote
Isn't that Stratios that's been discussed on the last few pages just the same one that was the new prize after the Guardian Vexors etc were cancelled? If so, then why does anyone think CCP has 'unpaused' the declared pause in the rewards programme? There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
465
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 16:24:00 -
[1678] - Quote
Brendan Anneto wrote:Forlorn Wongraven wrote:Jealous people killing a reward that CCP gives out to people who support the community. As far as the first somer lottery was concerned this was a mistake and CCP actually fixed it.
Also thanks, Guard! Somer Blink does't support the community. They are a Third-Party for profit organisation that was created for the sole purpose of fattening their wallets. all they are is a gambling site. They do not support the community in any way shape or form, except by heping people blow their isk.
This, yet CCP is blind to it either intentionally or through stupidity. |

Kate stark
919
|
Posted - 2013.12.02 18:28:00 -
[1679] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote: If you are perceiving a problem with ISD behaviour on the forum or are disagreeing with the way (your) posts are being moderated, please feel free to read the CCP policies and follow the procedure found under the header 'Complaints'.
not to be rude, but you ISDs are irrelevant.
we're unable to get an answer to a worth while issue, do you really think you're relevant enough for ccp to investigate if we do have an issue with your moderation?
if you answered yes; stop kidding yourself. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
267
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 05:07:00 -
[1680] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote: For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. We want to carefully consider your feedback and determine what our framework should be and what improvements to the level of transparency are needed so that the rewards program serves its intended purpose of making the EVE Universe a better place. WeGÇÖll also make prizes and rewards a summit topic when the CSM visits us this winter, as well as consult with them until that time. Some of this work has already started, and the result will be a formalized and transparent framework for everything related to supporting all types of fansites and third-party community services. We aim to circulate our initial design to the CSM in the next few days, and you should see a dev blog in a few weeks.
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
I take it CCP has unpaused the plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. The worst bit is the Stratios Emergency Responder should never have been given out to these parties. The Ishukone Watch Scorpions at least were re-skined with worst stats than any other scorpions. The Strat Emergency Reponder has nearly twice better stats. So I have a few questions here.
Why was the way to obtain these ships not revealed to the player base prior to them being put in game? Why are select players being given ships that exceed the stats of the ship for which it is based off of?
I believe giving certain players stuff that is free and unique is fine but it must NOT be better than an item for which you can get in game by working at it. The emergency responder is better than the stratios and to be frank here that is a bit of an insult to the community. As I stated, if you wish to give somer blink or any other site rare-in game ships that are re-skinned that is fine with me; however, I have issue with the fact its stats are better. The stats on the Emergency Responder need to be adjusted to match those of the standard Stratios. |
|

Kate stark
919
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 06:23:00 -
[1681] - Quote
Octoven wrote:CCP Guard wrote: For the time being we are pausing all plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. We want to carefully consider your feedback and determine what our framework should be and what improvements to the level of transparency are needed so that the rewards program serves its intended purpose of making the EVE Universe a better place. WeGÇÖll also make prizes and rewards a summit topic when the CSM visits us this winter, as well as consult with them until that time. Some of this work has already started, and the result will be a formalized and transparent framework for everything related to supporting all types of fansites and third-party community services. We aim to circulate our initial design to the CSM in the next few days, and you should see a dev blog in a few weeks.
ThatGÇÖs it for now, let us know your thoughts.
I take it CCP has unpaused the plans for rare in-game rewards to select third party contributors. The worst bit is the Stratios Emergency Responder should never have been given out to these parties. The Ishukone Watch Scorpions at least were re-skined with worst stats than any other scorpions. The Strat Emergency Reponder has nearly twice better stats. So I have a few questions here. Why was the way to obtain these ships not revealed to the player base prior to them being put in game? Why are select players being given ships that exceed the stats of the ship for which it is based off of? I believe giving certain players stuff that is free and unique is fine but it must NOT be better than an item for which you can get in game by working at it. The emergency responder is better than the stratios and to be frank here that is a bit of an insult to the community. As I stated, if you wish to give somer blink or any other site rare-in game ships that are re-skinned that is fine with me; however, I have issue with the fact its stats are better. The stats on the Emergency Responder need to be adjusted to match those of the standard Stratios.
before it was deleted we discussed this; the more likely outcome is that somer were not one of the "select third party contributors" subject to the pause. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2648
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 10:17:00 -
[1682] - Quote
So CCP are already back on the "handing out special shinies to people they like" kick?
After months of desperately ignoring the outcry from the last time it happened, they do it right again
hahahahahaha |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1221
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 10:21:00 -
[1683] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:So CCP are already back on the "handing out special shinies to people they like" kick?
After months of desperately ignoring the outcry from the last time it happened, they do it right again
hahahahahaha
Last year would like to hear your comments
Please write to them at
Old Hat Po Box 1998 The Heap Boring OldTwaddle Getwiththeprogrammeshire C1 1PP High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 11:09:00 -
[1684] - Quote
Strat Emergency Reponder ....
What? |

Tina Tin Tits
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 13:56:00 -
[1685] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:TheGunslinger42 wrote:So CCP are already back on the "handing out special shinies to people they like" kick?
After months of desperately ignoring the outcry from the last time it happened, they do it right again
hahahahahaha Last year would like to hear your comments Please write to them at Old Hat Po Box 1998 The Heap Boring OldTwaddle Getwiththeprogrammeshire C1 1PP
Which is sadder?
Coming here to complain about CCP's behaviour which annoys you? Or coming here because you dont care to complain about people who do care?
Whilst I dont care enough to quit playing, it has annoyed me enough to rationalise and close some accounts. This character is now sold, and its account closed. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1227
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 14:01:00 -
[1686] - Quote
Tina Tin **** wrote:
Which is sadder?
Coming here to complain about CCP's behaviour which annoys you? Or coming here because you dont care to complain about people who do care?
Whilst I dont care enough to quit playing, it has annoyed me enough to rationalise and close some accounts. This character is now sold, and its account closed.
Option 3
Thinking you know whats being talked about when you clearly dont, then commenting and saying "neener neener neener you can hurt me because I care so little I sold this toon" like anyone gives a stuff
Oh and suggesting that theres anything in spaceship pixels game that isnt sad anyway High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
287
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 14:05:00 -
[1687] - Quote
Wasn't the Emergency Responder the version that CCP provided for the Somer EVE Vegas lottery to replace the unique ships they were about to make non-unique?
i.e. nothing new, we discussed this ages ago, as Ramona was trying to point out but the subtlety was too much for a few people |

Tina Tin Tits
Perkone Caldari State
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 14:40:00 -
[1688] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:[quote=Tina Tin ****]
Thinking you know whats being talked about when you clearly dont, then commenting and saying "neener neener neener you can hurt me because I care so little I sold this toon" like anyone gives a stuff
I suggest you read what i said again, because you clearly failed to comprehend it. |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1232
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 14:45:00 -
[1689] - Quote
Tina Tin **** wrote:
I suggest you read what i said again, because you clearly failed to comprehend it.
Same back with knobs on High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
920
|
Posted - 2013.12.03 18:30:00 -
[1690] - Quote
Ruskarn Andedare wrote:Wasn't the Emergency Responder the version that CCP provided for the Somer EVE Vegas lottery to replace the unique ships they were about to make non-unique?
i.e. nothing new, we discussed this ages ago, as Ramona was trying to point out but the subtlety was too much for a few people
no idea.
i know, ccp could reply to the thread and tell us! Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 10:43:00 -
[1691] - Quote
Dear CCP,
What is the new policy with respect to CCP giveaways?
In addition what is CCP's position with respect to the claims that Somer has received unfair favouritism?
I put these questions simply, and I think politely. I do not see why a reply would not be appropriate.
Dark |

Frying Doom
3413
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 22:06:00 -
[1692] - Quote
Thank god for the new games coming out where customer service does not mean ignoring your customers. Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!! |

GreenSeed
766
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 22:13:00 -
[1693] - Quote
the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 22:34:00 -
[1694] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage.
Maybe not, but thanks for the bump.  Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Nanatoa
473
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 22:49:00 -
[1695] - Quote
Those who were following my 16B bait-and-switch scam saga, where SOMER BLINK did not grant my request for a refund after prizes in their contest were withdrawn, with SOMER blaming CCP for changing the prizes: a lead GM has confirmed (and I am paraphrasing here, as quoting him would be against the rules) that this contest was run by SOMER BLINK, with no oversight from CCP. The lead GM also said that no one from CCP had said that SOMER BLINK wouldn't scam, only that they haven't scammed in the past. "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:08:00 -
[1696] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Those who were following my 16B bait-and-switch scam saga, where SOMER BLINK did not grant my request for a refund after prizes in their contest were withdrawn, with SOMER blaming CCP for changing the prizes: a lead GM has confirmed (and I am paraphrasing here, as quoting him would be against the rules) that this contest was run by SOMER BLINK, with no oversight from CCP. The lead GM also said that no one from CCP had said that SOMER BLINK wouldn't scam, only that they haven't scammed in the past.
That's rather a jerk move on CCP's part, to try to dump all the responsibility on SOMER. Especially after CCP came out and said that SOMER had no control over the change in prizes, as it was CCP's decision in response to the player outrage. Since CCP made the change, they should bear primary responsibility for ensuring resulting reimbursements. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Nanatoa
473
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:20:00 -
[1697] - Quote
Kirren D'marr wrote:That's rather a jerk move on CCP's part, to try to dump all the responsibility on SOMER. Especially after CCP came out and said that SOMER had no control over the change in prizes, as it was CCP's decision in response to the player outrage. Since CCP made the change, they should bear primary responsibility for ensuring resulting reimbursements.
I disagree, as this was SOMER BLINK's contest, but I'll follow your line of thinking. Let's assume this is CCP's responsibility, and let's assume that SOMER BLINK is "trustworthy and reliable" as a dev has claimed (well before a GM confirmed SOMER BLINK did scam me) - why doesn't SOMER refund me my 16B and then claim the 16B from CCP?
Because right now the result is that SOMER is sitting on my 16B while pointing at CCP. SOMER has my 16B, I have nothing, and both SOMER and CCP point at eachother. Why doesn't SOMER give me my 16B back and then SOMER and CCP can fight amongst themselves who should ultimately pay for that refund? "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
93
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:48:00 -
[1698] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:That's rather a jerk move on CCP's part, to try to dump all the responsibility on SOMER. Especially after CCP came out and said that SOMER had no control over the change in prizes, as it was CCP's decision in response to the player outrage. Since CCP made the change, they should bear primary responsibility for ensuring resulting reimbursements. I disagree, as this was SOMER BLINK's contest, but I'll follow your line of thinking. Let's assume this is CCP's responsibility, and let's assume that SOMER BLINK is "trustworthy and reliable" as a dev has claimed (well before a GM confirmed SOMER BLINK did scam me) - why doesn't SOMER refund me my 16B and then claim the 16B from CCP? Because right now the result is that SOMER is sitting on my 16B while pointing at CCP. SOMER has my 16B, I have nothing, and both SOMER and CCP point at eachother. Why doesn't SOMER give me my 16B back and then SOMER and CCP can fight amongst themselves who should ultimately pay for that refund?
Well, probably because it's not your ISK anymore. It's SOMER's. So you should probably stop referring to as "your ISK"
The entire concept of SOMER is a scam. They charge more in tickets than the prizes cost. It's a for-profit enterprise. The more ISK you give them, the more you will lose.
The only thing your story does for me is the cement how ridiculous it is for CCP to trust SOMER with distributing prizes. They scam people.
CCP should not be officially affiliated with scammers. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
247
|
Posted - 2013.12.04 23:50:00 -
[1699] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:That's rather a jerk move on CCP's part, to try to dump all the responsibility on SOMER. Especially after CCP came out and said that SOMER had no control over the change in prizes, as it was CCP's decision in response to the player outrage. Since CCP made the change, they should bear primary responsibility for ensuring resulting reimbursements. I disagree, as this was SOMER BLINK's contest, but I'll follow your line of thinking. Let's assume this is CCP's responsibility, and let's assume that SOMER BLINK is "trustworthy and reliable" as a dev has claimed (well before a GM confirmed SOMER BLINK did scam me) - why doesn't SOMER refund me my 16B and then claim the 16B from CCP? Because right now the result is that SOMER is sitting on my 16B while pointing at CCP. SOMER has my 16B, I have nothing, and both SOMER and CCP point at eachother. Why doesn't SOMER give me my 16B back and then SOMER and CCP can fight amongst themselves who should ultimately pay for that refund?
Oh, I don't disagree that SOMER should be reimbursing you; I just think that since the prize change was CCP's doing, they should be making sure that it happens. Frankly, I think that both entities are culpable; I was just pointing out that I don't think CCP should get to weasel out of their share of the responsibility. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Kate stark
920
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 06:20:00 -
[1700] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage. no. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5283
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 06:23:00 -
[1701] - Quote
Pinky Hops wrote:Nanatoa wrote:Kirren D'marr wrote:That's rather a jerk move on CCP's part, to try to dump all the responsibility on SOMER. Especially after CCP came out and said that SOMER had no control over the change in prizes, as it was CCP's decision in response to the player outrage. Since CCP made the change, they should bear primary responsibility for ensuring resulting reimbursements. I disagree, as this was SOMER BLINK's contest, but I'll follow your line of thinking. Let's assume this is CCP's responsibility, and let's assume that SOMER BLINK is "trustworthy and reliable" as a dev has claimed (well before a GM confirmed SOMER BLINK did scam me) - why doesn't SOMER refund me my 16B and then claim the 16B from CCP? Because right now the result is that SOMER is sitting on my 16B while pointing at CCP. SOMER has my 16B, I have nothing, and both SOMER and CCP point at eachother. Why doesn't SOMER give me my 16B back and then SOMER and CCP can fight amongst themselves who should ultimately pay for that refund? Well, probably because it's not your ISK anymore. It's SOMER's. So you should probably stop referring to as "your ISK" The entire concept of SOMER is a scam. They charge more in tickets than the prizes cost. It's a for-profit enterprise. The more ISK you give them, the more you will lose. The only thing your story does for me is the cement how ridiculous it is for CCP to trust SOMER with distributing prizes. They scam people. CCP should not be officially affiliated with scammers. good honest contributors to the community, you mean There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 08:33:00 -
[1702] - Quote
CCP is still snubbing this whole dialogue. |

RAW23
571
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 08:38:00 -
[1703] - Quote
GreenSeed wrote:the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage.
Lots of us do but we're letting these guys carry the burden coz we're lazy  There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |

The Legendary Soldier
OreSum
332
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 09:03:00 -
[1704] - Quote
I just got a customer service survey for the ticket I logged complaining about moderation on this thread.
Irony in email form... ^^ Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Archibald Thistlewaite III
289
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 09:22:00 -
[1705] - Quote
RAW23 wrote:GreenSeed wrote:the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage. Lots of us do but we're letting these guys carry the burden coz we're lazy 
Confirming I'm lazy too. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2650
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 09:48:00 -
[1706] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Those who were following my 16B bait-and-switch scam saga, where SOMER BLINK did not grant my request for a refund after prizes in their contest were withdrawn, with SOMER blaming CCP for changing the prizes: a lead GM has confirmed (and I am paraphrasing here, as quoting him would be against the rules) that this contest was run by SOMER BLINK, with no oversight from CCP. The lead GM also said that no one from CCP had said that SOMER BLINK wouldn't scam, only that they haven't scammed in the past.
So is the GM confirming that somer are scammers?
Scammers who used official CCP sanctioned items/events to scam?
And using what Navigator had said to facilitate said scam?
Isn't that against the new scamming rules?
And can we get an official update from Navigator correcting his initial statements about how totally legit and cool somer are and just give them isk plz |

Kate stark
922
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 19:24:00 -
[1707] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote: I just got a customer service survey for the ticket I logged complaining about moderation on this thread.
Irony in email form... ^^
this is not the survey you are looking for. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Leigh Akiga
Trickle Down Economics
367
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 19:43:00 -
[1708] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:Dear CCP,
What is the new policy with respect to CCP giveaways?
In addition what is CCP's position with respect to the claims that Somer has received unfair favouritism?
I put these questions simply, and I think politely. I do not see why a reply would not be appropriate.
Dark
This is a good post right here and pretty much the crux of this thread. The silence is deafening.
What is the status of the emergency responder one of a kind half a trillion isk limited edition cruiser given to Somer? And why are you still doing this when you said you were gonna pause lol  |

Nanatoa
473
|
Posted - 2013.12.05 20:56:00 -
[1709] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:So is the GM confirming that somer are scammers?
The lead GM phrased his response very carefully. Did he say SOMER scammed? No. He did say that they wouldn't be doing anything, that they didn't say that SOMER wouldn't scam and that if SOMER had scammed (without actually going into if they did or not), they wouldn't be doing anything anyway.
It's just another event in EVE, even though this event was sponsered by CCP and endorsed by a CCP employee. The lead GM's stance is "buyer beware, even when we say it's all fine". "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Opia Munba
mss industry
19
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 14:03:00 -
[1710] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:RAW23 wrote:GreenSeed wrote:the same 5 - 6 players keep bumping the thread... go away please, most people do not share your fake outrage. Lots of us do but we're letting these guys carry the burden coz we're lazy  Confirming I'm lazy too. same here
|
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 14:45:00 -
[1711] - Quote
CCP is ignorant |

The Legendary Soldier
Jovian Innovations
332
|
Posted - 2013.12.06 16:25:00 -
[1712] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:CCP is ignorant
CCP is hoping we will all just **** off and forget about it ^^
They might win the battle (ignore us) and lose the war (prove that they will follow the money regardless of what is right) Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 01:08:00 -
[1713] - Quote
There is someone in CCP, I am not sure who, but they issued the command to totally ignore all of us in this thread.
We are actually REAL LIFE CUSTOMERS of this company. I know we are also gamers, with avatars and stupid names... but we are also paying customers just like any other customer on the street.
And most of us, all in all, have paid a lot to CCP for this game.
It is frankly disgraceful that they are ignoring us totally.
It isnt even as if they are staying out of this thread and making statements elsewhere to avoid 'trolling'. The person inside CCP responsible for this snubbing has literally decided to blank us and give us the middle finger.
Surely there is someone in CCP with leadership skills?
Cant they just suggest that some kind of statement, even if it is outside this thread, is required?
I wouldn't even care if this thread was locked after.
It is simply unbelievable that CCP has opted to totally snub and ignore the lot of us like this. |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 07:33:00 -
[1714] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:There is someone in CCP, I am not sure who, but they issued the command to totally ignore all of us in this thread.
We are actually REAL LIFE CUSTOMERS of this company. I know we are also gamers, with avatars and stupid names... but we are also paying customers just like any other customer on the street.
And most of us, all in all, have paid a lot to CCP for this game.
It is frankly disgraceful that they are ignoring us totally.
It isnt even as if they are staying out of this thread and making statements elsewhere to avoid 'trolling'. The person inside CCP responsible for this snubbing has literally decided to blank us and give us the middle finger.
Surely there is someone in CCP with leadership skills?
Cant they just suggest that some kind of statement, even if it is outside this thread, is required?
I wouldn't even care if this thread was locked after.
It is simply unbelievable that CCP has opted to totally snub and ignore the lot of us like this.
the worst part is, this is their own thread not some random player's whine. they intentionally created this thread, then abandoned it. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:25:00 -
[1715] - Quote
just saying guys you all just sound like a moany bunch of bitches....SOMER has been around forever to get to the state its in now, most of you people crying more than likely haven't even been around long enough to no what scams happened back in the day.....
I use SOMER just for some fun while in big fleets or station spinning, they will move your ships to a system for you if you so wish and have a good selection to bid on, SOMER one of the few lottos about that hasn't up and jacked all the isk off everyone, I would even go as far as saying that its one of the few things in eve that can be trusted....yes some people of there have dumped tones of cash into it and bid on 90% of tickets increasing there cash and wins like that but if you cant do that then tough welcome to eve
next thing you no you all be ganging up on chribba for having to much rare items and isk
the fact you would say SOMER has done nufing for eve players just goes to show how little you know, pretty much your all saying chribba done nufing ether.......1st and formost thing he has done has installed some trust back into eve, and provides a good lotto system that if you have a brain in your head you can win quite a lot on (myself last I check 1bill payed in 5bill payed out)
|

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:27:00 -
[1716] - Quote
actually, we couldn't give a toss about somer. replace somer with any one else and the issue still remains. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
56
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:56:00 -
[1717] - Quote
I find it interesting how there are these pilots coming out the woodwork counter arguing us.
They must be alts of interested partys |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 08:58:00 -
[1718] - Quote
Dark Magni wrote:I find it interesting how there are these pilots coming out the woodwork counter arguing us.
They must be alts of interested partys
i find it even more amusing that they think this is about somer rather than ccp's ill thought out rewards scheme. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:01:00 -
[1719] - Quote
been outside lakely? breath in the smell of real life and you will noticed that prople make money off other ppl
e.g: Ladbrokes, betfare, facebook banks etc etc
let me know when your struggle to get all them shut down and the world make into a totally fair place and we will talk more.
saying that eve is a game but a game the resambles real life quite closely, maybe beceause the players drive it or maybe that's how ccp wants it, ether way SOMER is a way to blow some isk take some riska and reap the rewards and fails, that in itself is add alittle extra to eve as a game, altho is maybe be the betting side of eve it still makes eve part of what it is whitch is risk and lets be honest if you ant willing the take the risk you don't play and if you are you do, choice is yours just like everytime you PVP or go into low/null sec you take a risk
as for the rewards, hes put a lot of effort into making SOMEr what it is now and about time a reward is due
personaly I see nufing wrong here and hope ccp continues to egnore you all
I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:04:00 -
[1720] - Quote
anids wrote:I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus
perhaps you should read the thread, because that's not what we're saying at all. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:05:00 -
[1721] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Dark Magni wrote:I find it interesting how there are these pilots coming out the woodwork counter arguing us.
They must be alts of interested partys i find it even more amusing that they think this is about somer rather than ccp's ill thought out rewards scheme.
I do woner if your cearbear tears are extra salty as you seem so upset they got something shinny an you didn't....I think we should take away the alliance tourney gifts as they didn't earn them...infact I think ccp rise(aka kil2) should get paid for a year cuz he made a cloaky cruiser thn can do 800dps
amgad!!!! |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:07:00 -
[1722] - Quote
anids wrote:Kate stark wrote:Dark Magni wrote:I find it interesting how there are these pilots coming out the woodwork counter arguing us.
They must be alts of interested partys i find it even more amusing that they think this is about somer rather than ccp's ill thought out rewards scheme. I do woner if your cearbear tears are extra salty as you seem so upset they got something shinny an you didn't....I think we should take away the alliance tourney gifts as they didn't earn them...infact I think ccp rise(aka kil2) should get paid for a year cuz he made a cloaky cruiser thn can do 800dps amgad!!!!
seems you still haven't read the thread, because i'm not upset about somer getting shiny things at all.
reading, try it. or, carry on making yourself look foolish. i don't mind. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:12:00 -
[1723] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus perhaps you should read the thread, because that's not what we're saying at all.
yh I read though the 82 pages of moany ass people about some ****** ships that was given out to SOMER when hes been around for freakign ages and never asked for anything, and ccp changed rewards last minite etc etc.......look at it like this there Is only one luxer cruiser in this game, worth trillions of isk, they got that for getting marryed at fan fest, affected no1 in eve, no1 cares, will you ever see it? prob not, will it every be sold? maybe who knows
the simple fact remains if they undock in there shinny ships they get ganked, that basicly makes them useless other than a gaint hanger paper weight, doesn't effect anyone in eve..
now if you want something to cry about skip back afew years to ccp employees spawning officer spams in BOB space or handing out t2 bpos
your argument is over something so small that 90% of eve gives 0 fucks I only came to see this cuz it was on the eve facebook page lol |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:13:00 -
[1724] - Quote
anids wrote:Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus perhaps you should read the thread, because that's not what we're saying at all. yh I read though the 82 pages of moany ass people about some ****** ships that was given out to SOMER when hes been around for freakign ages and never asked for anything, and ccp changed rewards last minite etc etc.......look at it like this there Is only one luxer cruiser in this game, worth trillions of isk, they got that for getting marryed at fan fest, affected no1 in eve, no1 cares, will you ever see it? prob not, will it every be sold? maybe who knows the simple fact remains if they undock in there shinny ships they get ganked, that basicly makes them useless other than a gaint hanger paper weight, doesn't effect anyone in eve.. now if you want something to cry about skip back afew years to ccp employees spawning officer spams in BOB space or handing out t2 bpos your argument is over something so small that 90% of eve gives 0 fucks I only came to see this cuz it was on the eve facebook page lol
clearly you didn't or you'd know that wasn't what the thread was about.
if you're going to post there's no need to lie, just admit you want to post in an 80 page thread and then leave. alternatively, read it properly and then contribute. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:19:00 -
[1725] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus perhaps you should read the thread, because that's not what we're saying at all. yh I read though the 82 pages of moany ass people about some ****** ships that was given out to SOMER when hes been around for freakign ages and never asked for anything, and ccp changed rewards last minite etc etc.......look at it like this there Is only one luxer cruiser in this game, worth trillions of isk, they got that for getting marryed at fan fest, affected no1 in eve, no1 cares, will you ever see it? prob not, will it every be sold? maybe who knows the simple fact remains if they undock in there shinny ships they get ganked, that basicly makes them useless other than a gaint hanger paper weight, doesn't effect anyone in eve.. now if you want something to cry about skip back afew years to ccp employees spawning officer spams in BOB space or handing out t2 bpos your argument is over something so small that 90% of eve gives 0 fucks I only came to see this cuz it was on the eve facebook page lol clearly you didn't or you'd know that wasn't what the thread was about. if you're going to post there's no need to lie, just admit you want to post in an 80 page thread and then leave. alternatively, read it properly and then contribute.
if I wanted to post on a big thread I when just go back and find a 200 page one, what kind of credit does posting on a 80 page thread give me? dam better go tell my alliance leadership they prob give me a fit titan and make my head fleet commander im that cool now :)
clearly you just being a whinny girl hence why ccp is egnoring you, but I guess some people cant take the hint ;) |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:19:00 -
[1726] - Quote
anids wrote:Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:Kate stark wrote:anids wrote:I mean seriously all im seeing in all these posts is ppl just basicly saying "it isn't fair" and all I have to say is wake up and smell the cheese life isn't fair jesus perhaps you should read the thread, because that's not what we're saying at all. yh I read though the 82 pages of moany ass people about some ****** ships that was given out to SOMER when hes been around for freakign ages and never asked for anything, and ccp changed rewards last minite etc etc.......look at it like this there Is only one luxer cruiser in this game, worth trillions of isk, they got that for getting marryed at fan fest, affected no1 in eve, no1 cares, will you ever see it? prob not, will it every be sold? maybe who knows the simple fact remains if they undock in there shinny ships they get ganked, that basicly makes them useless other than a gaint hanger paper weight, doesn't effect anyone in eve.. now if you want something to cry about skip back afew years to ccp employees spawning officer spams in BOB space or handing out t2 bpos your argument is over something so small that 90% of eve gives 0 fucks I only came to see this cuz it was on the eve facebook page lol clearly you didn't or you'd know that wasn't what the thread was about. if you're going to post there's no need to lie, just admit you want to post in an 80 page thread and then leave. alternatively, read it properly and then contribute. if I wanted to post on a big thread I when just go back and find a 200 page one, what kind of credit does posting on a 80 page thread give me? dam better go tell my alliance leadership they prob give me a fit titan and make my head fleet commander im that cool now :) clearly you just being a whinny girl hence why ccp is egnoring you, but I guess some people cant take the hint ;)
i've just noticed your alliance.
i should have known better. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

anids
modro Against ALL Authorities
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:27:00 -
[1727] - Quote
well at lest I ant hiding behide a alt on forums ;) forever makes my laugh when people get mad cuz they got screwed or missed out on things.....here what should happen, all upset partys send me all your isk and stuff and then delete your char and unsub ur accounts in protest.....simple fix ill be exspect some contacts and blinky wallets soon
ty for all thos with enuf passion on this matter to rage quit eve only
re-va-la-resitance |

Kate stark
926
|
Posted - 2013.12.07 09:36:00 -
[1728] - Quote
anids wrote:well at lest I ant hiding behide a alt on forums ;) forever makes my laugh when people get mad cuz they got screwed or missed out on things.....here what should happen, all upset partys send me all your isk and stuff and then delete your char and unsub ur accounts in protest.....simple fix ill be exspect some contacts and blinky wallets soon
ty for all thos with enuf passion on this matter to rage quit eve only
re-va-la-resitance
I'm not hiding on an alt.
although i see you've resorted to childish slander instead of contributing to the thread that you've still yet to read. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Nanatoa
474
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:09:00 -
[1729] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:the issue acutally is that using third parties to distribute community rewards is a bad idea, and just gifting ingame items to players is also bad (which obviously you understand as you referenced t20).
And implicitly or explicitly endorsing certain organisations over others is also a bad idea. (Now a pet peeve of mine, sorry.)
"Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1304
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:18:00 -
[1730] - Quote
What's a fair way of distributing rare items? High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |
|

Kate stark
935
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:27:00 -
[1731] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:What's a fair way of distributing rare items?
don't.
(yes, that was sarcasm for the trolls, just so they're aware.) Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Jovian Innovations
332
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:32:00 -
[1732] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Kate stark wrote:the issue acutally is that using third parties to distribute community rewards is a bad idea, and just gifting ingame items to players is also bad (which obviously you understand as you referenced t20). And implicitly or explicitly endorsing certain organisations over others is also a bad idea. (Now a pet peeve of mine, sorry.)
This is true, however, I think that has now become a secondary issue to the point that a decision has been made to TOTALLY ignore paying customers. This must have come from the highest level, and is an extremely worrying precedent. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Kate stark
936
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 12:39:00 -
[1733] - Quote
I don't know about the rest of you, but i'd just be happy with a "we're still looking in to it, the surveys are nearly ready to send out even though it has taken us about 6 weeks longer than it should have" post.
i'm not even looking for solid answers, just an update on the current state of play. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
2348
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 13:37:00 -
[1734] - Quote
It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days? Sovereignty and Population New Mining Mechanics |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1312
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 13:43:00 -
[1735] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPcDwDdXHZI
There you go High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Kate stark
948
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 13:52:00 -
[1736] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days?
then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Dirt Nap Squad.
602
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 16:13:00 -
[1737] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Abrazzar wrote:It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days? then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant.
It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. It was undoubtedly a big deal because CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year.
Even if all that report says is:
1) Yes this was RMT.
2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them.
3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again.
Argus |

The Legendary Soldier
Jovian Innovations
332
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 20:13:00 -
[1738] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant AND untrustworthy.
Fixed that for you... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Pinky Hops
Spartan's DNA Apex.
103
|
Posted - 2013.12.08 21:37:00 -
[1739] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:What's a fair way of distributing rare items?
Contests/tournaments.
Has there ever been a CCP endorsed lottery of rare items that DIDN'T cause a clusterfuck?
Does anybody remember the T2 BPO Lottery?
When will CCP learn from their mistakes? Probably never. |

Octoven
Phoenix Productions Headshot Gaming
267
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 04:21:00 -
[1740] - Quote
anids wrote:just saying guys you all just sound like a moany bunch of bitches....SOMER has been around forever to get to the state its in now, most of you people crying more than likely haven't even been around long enough to no what scams happened back in the day.....
I use SOMER just for some fun while in big fleets or station spinning, they will move your ships to a system for you if you so wish and have a good selection to bid on, SOMER one of the few lottos about that hasn't up and jacked all the isk off everyone, I would even go as far as saying that its one of the few things in eve that can be trusted....yes some people of there have dumped tones of cash into it and bid on 90% of tickets increasing there cash and wins like that but if you cant do that then tough welcome to eve
next thing you no you all be ganging up on chribba for having to much rare items and isk
the fact you would say SOMER has done nufing for eve players just goes to show how little you know, pretty much your all saying chribba done nufing ether.......1st and formost thing he has done has installed some trust back into eve, and provides a good lotto system that if you have a brain in your head you can win quite a lot on (myself last I check 1bill payed in 5bill payed out)
Funny enough you should reference Chribba. However, you are indeed wrong in that reference. As such you are trying to compare earning the trust of a swindler compared to a humanitarian. Chribba earned his trust by keeping his word and not scamming. He has done nothing thus far to make the eve community question his trustworthiness and combine that with all the sites and tools he has developed at no cost to the player, his dedication to improving the community is evident. Now let us look at SOMER on the other hand who has been notorious for scamming many people. Their mantra is to make money and while that is the risk of the player they are still nothing but a common gambling operation intent on robbing you of isk.
Just because they move your ships for you and get it there without issue you think this warrants the same level of trust that others like Chribba has cultivated? I dare say you must be mad. As far as rare items are concerned I am certain that any items Chribba posses that are rare were obtained by playing the game and not given to for running a gambling house. Even rare special edition ships in game like the Cambion for example were given as prizes for participating in in game events. Others like the gnosis were given freely without doing anything but were given by CCP to the players. This notion of giving a third party free limited quantity items and then in turn allowing those items to be sold at insane prices to other players is ludicrous.
If they want to give somer special items for the EVE Vegas hosting as a thank you fine I have no issue so long as they are reskinned and not better in stats. If they wish to give them better stat items well at least make the items locked to that account so they cant be traded or sold. There is no reason anyone should be given superior items in game free that could get them billions of isk. |
|

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
591
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 06:25:00 -
[1741] - Quote
Octoven.
Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.
Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.
TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already. |

Opia Munba
mss industry
20
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 08:13:00 -
[1742] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Octoven.
Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.
Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.
TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already. people with brains didn`t give a flying f%ck about the scorp paintjob, it was about the market value that they had. and the fact it wasn`t disclosed. Also the people in the know didn`t give a f%ck about the gambling concept... it was the fact that Somer was stretching the eula to make a real life income. TLDR ... way to dumb post |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2651
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 12:16:00 -
[1743] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Kate stark wrote:Abrazzar wrote:It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days? then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant. It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. A major in game entity was proven to be RMT'ing. Both of these questions/concerns need to be addressed, even if no further action is being taken against the devs or the entity. For instance, a report that says: 1) Yes this was RMT. 2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them. 3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again. Is a more than reasonable thing to expect. It'd be the right thing to do from a business and customer relations perspective that's for certain. Argus
A corporation admit to it's consumers that it made a mistake and apologise and promise to do better?
But that's the first thing they teach you NOT to do in Business and Management 101!
CCP used to act like that, but now they've got a few new people in sharp suits running things, it's time to clamp down on the whole open, interacting with the consumer thing. It was a total gimmick and wouldn't work in the real world, says Mr Suit. It's best to bury your head in the sand and pretend you are perfect, and hope the dumb plebs who give you money just shut up and forget it.
|

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
20
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 14:17:00 -
[1744] - Quote
I've unsubbed all 5 accounts due to things like this.
I stated in my unsub, "I am doing this due to greed (things like auto-renewal automatically occuring), and favoritism (The Mittani, SOMER, etc.)"
Let them know how you feel with your wallet. There's no other way. I'd rather grind endless hours in the game, knowing if all of this did it, we''d make a difference. |

Gordon Weaver
It's a Corp
5
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 17:06:00 -
[1745] - Quote
-2 accounts as it's the only language CCP seems to understand.
With blatant favoritism you have devalued your sandbox into not worth playing. Stop pissing in the sandbox CCP. Stop hiding and talk to your paying customers. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 19:25:00 -
[1746] - Quote
Dear CCP,
I am deeply concerned.
It seems that you are starting to depend more on PLEX / GTC sales, than on maintaining / increasing subscriptions, so as to maintain your profibility.
As such, I ask you :-
- Will CCP continue to focus on developing / maintaining Eve into the future, or will you just create new "shinnies", ( and give them to third party entities ), so as to maintain the lottery enterprises that exist, that help spur on the PLEX /GTC sales, ( possibly in a manner that actually violates your own TOS / EULA ) ?
- Do you really want to turn Eve, from a game to a Casino ?
- CCP, are you giving up on Eve, the game ?
Come on CCP, a clear transparent clarification on this Somer debarcle, and its many issues, would be nice and much appreciated.
Please CCP, stop ignoring this important thread and the issues that have been mentioned.
|

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
57
|
Posted - 2013.12.09 19:48:00 -
[1747] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote:Kate stark wrote:Abrazzar wrote:It's silly that absolutely nothing is coming from CCP. Even the most stupid threads directed at CCP get some Dev response but here? Nothing. Nil. Zilch.
Why not just lock this thread with "End of Line" so we all know who's in charge of PR these days? then they'd have to admit they don't give a **** and they lied to us about actually wanting feedback, and that the surveys were never going to happen and were also a lie and they'd just end up branding themselves as untrustworthy rather than ignorant. It is more than reasonable to expect a report on their investigation into this. CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year. A major in game entity was proven to be RMT'ing. Both of these questions/concerns need to be addressed, even if no further action is being taken against the devs or the entity. For instance, a report that says: 1) Yes this was RMT. 2) No we aren't issuing further punishments nor will we be banning anyone. This is because we feel that doing so is not in the best interest of EVE. However, you can be certain that we will continue monitor the actors in this very closely and should any other sketchy stuff happen, we will take swift and decisive action against them. 3) And MOST IMPORTANTLY, we also acknowledge that Devs endorsed, gave the stamp of approval to, and then showered with gifts and responsibility an in-game corporate entity that was later shown quite clearly to be in violation of the EULA. We think was pretty dumb on the part of the devs, but they are good, well meaning people who now understand their role as unbiased adjudicators of this game and we want to reassure you that this sort of crap won't happen again. Is a more than reasonable thing to expect. It'd be the right thing to do from a business and customer relations perspective that's for certain. Argus
This strikes me as being extremely reasonable.
Unfortunately someone at CCP has issued the order to snub this debate and its paying customers.
It is foolish, because the strategy isn't working. |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
2657
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 12:25:00 -
[1748] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Octoven.
Evidence needed if you want to accuse Somer of scamming people. Scams = not giving them what you said they would get for what they gave you. As opposed to encouraging people to buy into a scheme that doesn't give 100% rewards. Just because it's gambling doesn't make it a scam. Gambling can be just as honest as anything, Humanitarians can be just as much of a scam.
Also.... I.W.S. are just a reskinned scorpion with actually weaker stats. So you are fine with that give away I take it? Under your own words above.
TLDR version: Stop whining and get over yourself importance already.
To be fair there have been a number of people who bought somer credit when the possible prize was guardian vexors. Somer were saying "give isk, and you have a chance for a guardian vexor". Then CCP changed the reward to something else - at least one user tried to then get the isk back from somer. He had paid for a chance at a guardian vexor, not at the other thing, so he wanted his isk back. They refused. He contacted CCP, since it was their doing, and they basically said that even though they were involved, tough luck.
It's the ol' bait and switch. A scam. A bit odd since CCP themselves were involved, but a scam none the less.
And lets not forget the even more numerous people who've put money in, and then somer have turned round and banned them for nebulous reasons from taking part in the lottery draws.
Somer is a scam and an RMT operation. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
57
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 20:24:00 -
[1749] - Quote
The thing that annoys me most is how Somer is clearly influencing CCP in some way.
Lots of people in this debate are attacking Somer, but as Somer has influenced CCP to be in the same boat as them, CCP has to defend Somer in defending itself.
For example this strange 7 day grace period for Somer to RMT. The strange 'dead silence' approach CCP has taken to this debate. Also the hands off approach when the guardian-vexor prize was changed and Somer wouldnt refund isk.
There are so many more examples of where CCP are biased. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
553
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 23:13:00 -
[1750] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:I've unsubbed all 5 accounts due to things like this.
I stated in my unsub, "I am doing this due to greed (things like auto-renewal automatically occuring), and favoritism (The Mittani, SOMER, etc.)"
Let them know how you feel with your wallet. There's no other way. I'd rather grind endless hours in the game, knowing if all of this did it, we''d make a difference.
"Auto-renewal" happens in every game. In fact, it says when you go to add game time via credit card that it is going to happen, and it says that with World of Warcraft, Rift, Star Wars, etc. Don't act like it's only EvE Online and it's greed making them do it. That's just childish. |
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 23:43:00 -
[1751] - Quote
Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.
Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players . all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.
I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship |

Tweek Etimua
Aideron Robotics
16
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 23:46:00 -
[1752] - Quote
I find most of the complaints are based on WHO received the gift. This frankly is sad.
You can say "It's not right right to reward a gambling site" But the same could be argued about any "Community" group. It could be said that organizations like the folks who run the New Eden Open shouldn't get any special treatment cause at any point they could just take the prizes for them selves. The truth is that's true about any one. The other thing that's true is that people who got rewarded "BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL)" Didn't get any sort of grief from the community. " Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or theyGÇÖve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, CollectorGÇÖs editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc."
So this is just a GREAT example of how selfishness combined with the loudest complaint/biggest riot can ruin a good thing.
|

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
553
|
Posted - 2013.12.10 23:57:00 -
[1753] - Quote
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.
Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players . all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.
I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship
Only in EvE Online is lack of communication considered "open and honest". |

Kate stark
948
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 06:35:00 -
[1754] - Quote
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.
detailed and open?
they have said **** all of substance even when asked directly, several times. then ignored the thread for nearly two months.
i'm going to assume english isn't your first language.
edit: also the outright lies about "surveys" that have yet to be produced and i doubt ever will be... Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Jovian Innovations
334
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 09:41:00 -
[1755] - Quote
Tweek Etimua wrote:I find most of the complaints are based on WHO received the gift. This frankly is sad.
You can say "It's not right right to reward a gambling site" But the same could be argued about any "Community" group. It could be said that organizations like the folks who run the New Eden Open shouldn't get any special treatment cause at any point they could just take the prizes for them selves. The truth is that's true about any one. The other thing that's true is that people who got rewarded "BIG Lottery 10th anniversary event, Alliance Tournament player commentators, Alliance Tournament volunteers, the staff of the Syndicate Competitive League (SCL)" Didn't get any sort of grief from the community. " Sometimes it has to do with the timing of specific events related to that fansite or enterprise, sometimes your favorite is next in line or theyGÇÖve simply gotten something different, such as free accounts, trips and/or tickets to Fanfest, CollectorGÇÖs editions, a couple of time codes, devs flown to their events, T-shirts, posters, resin ship models etc. etc."
So this is just a GREAT example of how selfishness combined with the loudest complaint/biggest riot can ruin a good thing.
A lottery site exists to enrich the people who run it - not to contribute to the community.
People who actually DID contribute to the community (as opposed to CCP's bank balance) DO deserve to be rewarded.
This is actually a great example of how the "loudest complaint" can be TOTALLY ignored.
It is also a GREAT example of completely missing the point. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Ramona McCandless
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1372
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 11:08:00 -
[1756] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread. detailed and open?
I think they meant derailed and mangled lol High Priestess of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh "You are, quite literally, the best person ever." --áDomanique Altares,-áRifterlings "Send Ramona your ISK, and biomass." --áJarod Garamonde,-áSardaukar Merc Guild |

Karak Terrel
Foundation for CODE and THE NEW ORDER
488
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 13:48:00 -
[1757] - Quote
And still no answer from CCP? That is just sad, really really sad. And disappointing. |

Kate stark
948
|
Posted - 2013.12.11 18:39:00 -
[1758] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread. detailed and open? I think they meant derailed and mangled lol
to be fair CCP are usually good at the whole communication thing. look at basically any issue but this one where they're being vastly out of character. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
57
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 08:32:00 -
[1759] - Quote
Well, ladies and gentlemen. Truth will out.
CCP actually couldn't care less about what the little people (us) think about anything.
This whole thread is a massive insult. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5300
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 09:30:00 -
[1760] - Quote
Oh hey, I see this thread is making it's way to the depths to drown.
Op success There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
|

Tsobai Hashimoto
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 09:37:00 -
[1761] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.
Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players . all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.
I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship Only in EvE Online is lack of communication considered "open and honest".
No...your spoiled....you don't play many other mmo games do you, with stealth patches. No devs on forms. No blogs no Dev videos no play input listened to ever let alone CSM or thanks to player like red front. Rvb . brave boobies and. Yes even blink.
Games that don't give detailed graphs and reports on market figures. PvP kills. Plex movements. Amounts mined and other reports detailing how the latest expansion/ship/skill/market changes/tax changes/sov changes/fw changes etc have effected the map/econ/meta of Eve
MMOs that never have devs broadcasting tournaments like alliance tourney. Games that have little to zero interaction with its player base
You are spoiled to think CCP is lacking communication with its player base. They are the best Dev team to grace our gaming world and I personly tell every Dev team I can. Be more like CCP and you will turn a nich into 10+ years of very loyal gamers.
The only team I have seen that comes close. Is warframe (they do love streams monthly or more with players about updates etc) and they are not in a close second.
Thank you again CCP. I love your game and I support everything you have done. Keeping a game relevant for 10 years is hard, sometimes thankless, work |

Duran Veldspur
Rebel Empire
11
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 09:48:00 -
[1762] - Quote
thanks CCP for continueing to ruin the collectors market in EVE. just keep materializing new "limited" edition ships so that those who are trying to invest lose out and thus lose interest in that market and many lose interest in EVE (what else will be ruined needlessly?)
get your heads out of your asses! |

Dark Magni
The Tuskers
57
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 11:02:00 -
[1763] - Quote
Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread.
Honestly I find nothing wrong with what happened. I think the Dev team could use some good PR though. You should create 1 or 2 more IWS and have blink setup a lotto to all players . all profits are used to buy up plex off market and do one last final donation to plex for good.
I would buy a few tickets and I could care less about the ship Only in EvE Online is lack of communication considered "open and honest". No...your spoiled....you don't play many other mmo games do you, with stealth patches. No devs on forms. No blogs no Dev videos no player input listened to ever, let alone CSM or any thanks to player groups like red frog. Rvb . brave noobies and Yes even blink. Games that don't give detailed graphs and reports on market figures. PvP kills. Plex movements. Amounts mined and other reports detailing how the latest expansion/ship/skill/market changes/tax changes/sov changes/fw changes etc have effected the map/econ/meta of Eve How many mmo games even have a test server where anyone can buy and test anything? Learn to pvp for free and try out every expansion before release and have devs LISTENING to feedback....how many changes did the murader balance go thru? At least 3 since sisi release....is it what everyone wanted? No. But almost no Dev team try that hard MMOs that never have devs broadcasting tournaments like alliance tourney. Games that have little to zero interaction with its player base You are spoiled to think CCP is lacking communication with its player base. They are the best Dev team to grace our gaming world and I personly tell every Dev team I can. Be more like CCP and you will turn a nich into 10+ years of very loyal gamers. The only team I have seen that comes close. Is warframe (they do love streams monthly or more with players about updates etc) and they are not in a close second. Thank you again CCP. I love your game and I support everything you have done. Keeping a game relevant for 10 years is hard, sometimes thankless, work
Garbage. Total Garbage.
Hence why I didn't bother reading past the first sentence (it is you're not your btw). |

Ryann Padecain
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 14:45:00 -
[1764] - Quote
OMG that spelling error.. that means his whole statement is garbage!! logic has arrived! |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5303
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:08:00 -
[1765] - Quote
Yeah, if this is the level of the ccp defenders, I think general discussion should try this on Heroic mode. There are no goons. The goons; 0.0 dream is over.
Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action. ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

The Legendary Soldier
Omber Hombres
334
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 15:48:00 -
[1766] - Quote
Ryann Padecain wrote:OMG that spelling error.. that means his whole statement is garbage!! logic has arrived!
No. It's garbage because it's garbage.
The grammatical error was just icing for the cake... Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Tsobai Hashimoto
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
147
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 18:54:00 -
[1767] - Quote
The Legendary Soldier wrote:Ryann Padecain wrote:OMG that spelling error.. that means his whole statement is garbage!! logic has arrived! No. It's garbage because it's garbage. The grammatical error was just icing for the cake...
honestly. Who gives other than trolls? It used to be ye and then y'all? How many years did trolls yap about that? Pointless!
You / your / you're /y'all/ ye are Spoiled about what you have. The number one evidence to CCP being an amazing Dev team is the simple fact your /you're / Ye / y'all here. You have been here for years. And no, your/ you're/ all y'all/ ye are not going to quit.
Name another mmo that has this much attention to detail and player input from the Dev team? I have played eq eq2 star wars. Wow , coh ,vanguard ,war ,gw ,gw2 , xyzon and countless other freebies and small time crap..... Nothing, including non mmo game devs come close to what we get here....get off your / you're / y'all / ye high horse. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 20:18:00 -
[1768] - Quote
CCP, please respond.
The many issues contained in this thread, IMO, you need to address and be fixed.
Come on CCP, please. |

Kate stark
957
|
Posted - 2013.12.12 21:16:00 -
[1769] - Quote
so other than somer's RMT scheme being 'bad' and had to be changed when people started doing it in the droves.... what has this thread actually provided other than an excuse for ccp to lock any other thread on the topic with the duplicate/redundant justification? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
555
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 04:19:00 -
[1770] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread. detailed and open? I think they meant derailed and mangled lol to be fair CCP are usually good at the whole communication thing. look at basically any issue but this one where they're being vastly out of character.
Mmmm, Monoclegate remembers.
Anyways, CCP has been lackluster in their response here, and it borders on EA levels of bad. |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5303
|
Posted - 2013.12.13 16:51:00 -
[1771] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:Kate stark wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kate stark wrote:Tsobai Hashimoto wrote:Good or bad....right or wrong. I love how open and honest EVE devs are compared to any other game I have played. Than you for the detailed and open thread. detailed and open? I think they meant derailed and mangled lol to be fair CCP are usually good at the whole communication thing. look at basically any issue but this one where they're being vastly out of character. Mmmm, Monoclegate remembers. Anyways, CCP has been lackluster in their response here, and it borders on EA levels of bad. Well, the issue is "solved" isn't it? The good honest contributors to the community had a massive "selling" spree in their last 10 days of grace and everything is done. There are no goons. The goons; 0.0 dream is over.
Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action. ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Nanatoa
482
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:51:00 -
[1772] - Quote
I don't think this issue belongs on the third page. "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Kate stark
966
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:56:00 -
[1773] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:I don't think this issue belongs on the third page.
it should still be stickied as it's still an ongoing issue. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Leigh Akiga
Trickle Down Economics
372
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 23:52:00 -
[1774] - Quote
Cue up a somer alt to say: rarrrg stop bumping the thread..
The people demand justice |

Anya Klibor
Error-404 Cup Of ConKrete.
555
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 05:02:00 -
[1775] - Quote
From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting. |

Kate stark
972
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 12:56:00 -
[1776] - Quote
Anya Klibor wrote:From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting.
so somer have made that much isk they can cash out at a lower isk -> $ ratio in order to increase volume of transactions? Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2147
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 19:53:00 -
[1777] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting. so somer have made that much isk they can cash out at a lower isk -> $ ratio in order to increase volume of transactions?
What isk->$ ratio?
They're not giving away any ISK with the GTCs now. They're getting less $ with each transaction. That's it. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Kate stark
972
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 19:59:00 -
[1778] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Kate stark wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting. so somer have made that much isk they can cash out at a lower isk -> $ ratio in order to increase volume of transactions? What isk->$ ratio? They're not giving away any ISK with the GTCs now. They're getting less $ with each transaction. That's it.
so they're just going with volume over margin then.
I'm not overly concerned with somers RMTing anyway, there are more important issues that are being ignored than who's ebaying their isk. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
2147
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 20:05:00 -
[1779] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Steve Ronuken wrote:Kate stark wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting. so somer have made that much isk they can cash out at a lower isk -> $ ratio in order to increase volume of transactions? What isk->$ ratio? They're not giving away any ISK with the GTCs now. They're getting less $ with each transaction. That's it. so they're just going with volume over margin then.
Yup, along with a side of 'we're trying to get something else for you'.
As long as that 'something else' isn't directly eve related (teamspeak hosting, or something.not ships/isk/credits to convert to ships/isk), it's pretty much fine. No impact on the sandbox. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 02:30:00 -
[1780] - Quote
CCP, come on guys.
There are real issues here, and all the while Somer are laughing all the way to the bank, at your expense! |
|

Archibald Thistlewaite III
292
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 06:18:00 -
[1781] - Quote
So, Somer is still using Eve to run a business that makes them a RL income?
I thought that was a breach of the EULA. |

Sara Rasa
Elixa
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 16:05:00 -
[1782] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:So, Somer is still using Eve to run a business that makes them a RL income?
I thought that was a breach of the EULA.
Only if YOU or I do it... |

Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
585
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 19:13:00 -
[1783] - Quote
Argus Sorn wrote: CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year.
This except take out the basically part.
CCP considers this matter resolved to the player base.
Bump this thread all you want but you got your answer, you just don't like it. Not today spaghetti. |

Kate stark
982
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 21:05:00 -
[1784] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:Argus Sorn wrote: CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year.
This except take out the basically part. CCP considers this matter resolved to the player base. Bump this thread all you want but you got your answer, you just don't like it.
except RMT wasn't the original topic of this thread, the original topic remains void of any kind of answer what so ever. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
120
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 04:44:00 -
[1785] - Quote
CCP,
Look, no matter how much GTC / PLEX sales can be directly atributed, directly because of Somer, ( which is, of course, good for your business ), Somer managed to make real money from your game, Eve, in 'direct violation' of your own EULA / TOS.
Somer has RMT'ed.
CCP, come on, please do the right thing. ( Ignoring this issue is not the "right thing", nor is possibly locking / deleting this thread ). |

Mini Vordul
Have A Seat
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 12:59:00 -
[1786] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:Argus Sorn wrote: CCP devs basically issued a full out endorsement for an entity that was proven to be RMT'ing to the tune of $40,000 a year.
This except take out the basically part. CCP considers this matter resolved to the player base. Bump this thread all you want but you got your answer, you just don't like it. except RMT wasn't the original topic of this thread, the original topic remains void of any kind of answer what so ever.
My point was that no answer at all from CCP is an answer in and of itself and that answer is 'stfu'. |

Arduemont
The State of War.
2499
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 13:26:00 -
[1787] - Quote
CCP only show us the illusion that they care what we think. Unless people start unsubbing over the issue I doubt you will make any difference. Because that's all they care about. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

Alice Lacie
Red Frog Freight Red-Frog
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 15:30:00 -
[1788] - Quote
Arduemont wrote:CCP only show us the illusion that they care what we think. Unless people start unsubbing over the issue I doubt you will make any difference. Because that's all they care about.
This is certainly true. Whilst it is their right to care more about money than their customers, or their integrity, it is our right to continue to draw attention to these facts. |

Kate stark
983
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 18:41:00 -
[1789] - Quote
Mini Vordul wrote:My point was that no answer at all from CCP is an answer in and of itself and that answer is 'stfu'.
ignoring a thread they created is not an "answer". Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Kate stark
983
|
Posted - 2013.12.17 18:42:00 -
[1790] - Quote
also guys, don't feel to bad. according to ripard's blog the CSM have been ignored just as much with respect to the minutes of the CSM summit. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |
|

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
39
|
Posted - 2013.12.18 04:08:00 -
[1791] - Quote
I would now like to auction off a rare item: An un-licked-by-CCP-devs piece of Somerset Mahm's boots!
Starting at only 1b isk per GTC! |

Kate stark
986
|
Posted - 2013.12.18 07:39:00 -
[1792] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:I would now like to auction off a rare item: An un-licked-by-CCP-devs piece of Somerset Mahm's boots!
Starting at only 1b isk per GTC!
clearly a scam, no such thing exists. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

Opia Munba
mss industry
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.18 10:43:00 -
[1793] - Quote
Alice Lacie wrote:Arduemont wrote:CCP only show us the illusion that they care what we think. Unless people start unsubbing over the issue I doubt you will make any difference. Because that's all they care about. This is certainly true. Whilst it is their right to care more about money than their customers, or their integrity, it is our right to continue to draw attention to these facts.
This is my last account, it`s timing out on a 6 month contract and I haven`t even logged in to Rubicon lol. When I started playing Eve years ago I found it extremely difficult to get on with, people have to act with a certain amount of autonomy when they play and in effect make their own game. This was also the most unique and eventually rewarding aspect of the game. I have mined highsec and null, manufactured frigs to freighters, market beared and pvp`ed. These are the things I love about Eve.
Part of the reason for quitting was (off topic) the jump animation. It drove me nuts because Eve`s not about that, it`s a game for purists and always should be. Somer Blink was pretty much the other part. I have no problem with blink, I enjoyed to blink my arse off, but when it started to get this attention from CCP it fracured my purist dream and made me die a little inside. So many different tools,ideas and entities interact with Eve and they expect nothing in return and this is how for me it should have stayed. Unfortunately in business money is everything. 15 redundancies for CCP is both sad and indicative of how things are. They need to make money (this is not a stealth eve is dying thread btw). Somer make money, both for themselves and for CCP by creating a demand for isk and at this time are pretty much doing legally with CCP`s blessing at a guess.(There has to be an agreement to supply GTC`s at a reduced rate) This is why the thread is so empty of CCP and CSM replies. Could it have been different in retrospect? Yes, if they left Blink alone I doubt anyone would give a flying F$ck. Showing favourtism towards certain 3rd party sites , flashy epilepsy inducing animations and throwing money at rift are bad investments in my opinion. They should invest in making Eve more accessible ,user friendly and continue to be rewarding ( Iknow they are but progress is slow). People get bored of the other stuff. Rant over. |

Bronco Platz
Intercosmic Fruit Company
115
|
Posted - 2013.12.18 11:14:00 -
[1794] - Quote
Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:So, Somer is still using Eve to run a business that makes them a RL income?
I thought that was a breach of the EULA.
It is not if you generate a really big income for CCP, too. I.e. selling a lot of GTC. This signature is under NDA. Sorry. |

Kirren D'marr
State Protectorate Caldari State
258
|
Posted - 2013.12.18 19:53:00 -
[1795] - Quote
Bronco Platz wrote:Archibald Thistlewaite III wrote:So, Somer is still using Eve to run a business that makes them a RL income?
I thought that was a breach of the EULA. It is not if you generate a really big income for CCP, too. I.e. selling a lot of GTC.
No, it's still a breach of EULA then; CCP just doesn't care to enforce it. It's a minor technicality, and the end result is the same, but a difference nonetheless. Why a switch on/off? Because the new animation doesn't add anything to gameplay and it's graphically annoying. In other words, it's worse than bad: it's useless. Simple as that.-á-á-á-á-á - Kina Ayami |

Nanatoa
484
|
Posted - 2013.12.19 11:08:00 -
[1796] - Quote
Luckily CCP will come out with a dev blog which will clear everything up "in a few weeks". Now all we have to figure out what number "a few" stands for. It's bigger than 10, we know that by now... "Stay the course, we have done this many times before." - (CCP) Hilmar, June 2011
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.12.20 06:01:00 -
[1797] - Quote
CCP,
Come on guys. There are real issues here.
Please, give the community an answer concerning the Somer issues, please. |

Kate stark
1006
|
Posted - 2013.12.21 00:34:00 -
[1798] - Quote
so i filled in this survey the other day for eve online; there wasn't a single question about community rewards on it. Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this. |

The Legendary Soldier
Kernite Kollectors
335
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 22:09:00 -
[1799] - Quote
Still waiting. Need to place a high-sec POS? Premade corps for sale, or your corps standings boosted. Trading since January 2012. Many corps sold/boosted - see my thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=63128&find=unread |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5346
|
Posted - 2013.12.22 22:24:00 -
[1800] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Luckily CCP will come out with a dev blog which will clear everything up "in a few weeks". Now all we have to figure out what number "a few" stands for. It's bigger than 10, we know that by now... Soon (tm) ? There are no goons. The goons; 0.0 dream is over.
Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action. ~NC., Fountain 2013 |
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 01:55:00 -
[1801] - Quote
CCP,
Please respond to these Somer issues, please. |

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2800
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:40:00 -
[1802] - Quote
I'm pretty sure the ongoing silence from CCP tells us everything we need to know about their position. Post on the Eve-o forums with a Goonswarm Federation character that drinking bleach is bad for you, and 20 forum warriors will hospitalise themselves trying to prove you wrong. |

Jove Death
The Jovian Navy
324
|
Posted - 2013.12.23 09:52:00 -
[1803] - Quote
Guys and gals now come on give CCP a break.
Its hard for them to make a post with 3 words in it.
"we fooked up"
What you have to remember is that somer is player driven and is a huge income earner for EvE.
People spend money on plex then use the isk in somer then buy more plex and put more money into some. If chars actually didnt play somer they wouldnt be there.
The amount of money ccp has generated in some must be hundreds of thousands of pounds. So they will keep this going as long as they can.
End of the day ccp could have shut them down along time ago but wont. They also didnt have to give them the free stuff. Quoting "you will die" in EvE is fail Chars dont die in EvE. Unless you have a heart attack eek
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
123
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 20:44:00 -
[1804] - Quote
Looks like we have to wait until after the holiday season for a, hopeful, responce from CCP.
CCP, please do respond, when you get a chance, hopefully soon, please.
Anyway, to all, Merry Christmas. |

Ahlea Corinth
Professional Losers
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 21:38:00 -
[1805] - Quote
As an executive manager at my company, we are faced with a decision each quarter on whether or not to issue bonuses to our staff members. Some things that are taken into consideration:
- Is it financially viable for the enterprise to issue bonuses - How much of a bonus pool exists if so? - What are the criteria for staff to receive bonuses? - Are bonuses discretionary (meaning subjective) or metrics based (objective, same for all) or a combination?
Employees will like it, or not like it, but we do the best we can to be fair and reward those who go far and beyond over what is expected of them and hope that bonuses inspire folks to reach for the stars during the next quarter if they want a larger share.
Now, translate that concept to here. CCP sees tremendous value in the SOMER Blink initiative and rewards it with a bunch of rare issue Scorpions. The folks at SOMER Blink don't need the isk, so to them it's a gesture alone. To CCP it's a tool at their disposal to reward those who go, in their eyes, above and beyond.
So rather than bark at CCP about recognizing what it sees as key contributors, spend your time developing your own initiative and become the next SOMER Blink and you will earn an Ishukone Scorpion too.
In terms of real world $ drawn from the BLINK initiative, it's just like law enforcement. Officers who pull someone over for speeding can choose to give a warning, a ticket, or not pull someone over at all. Discretion. CCP has the same discretion. I believe the EULA (the spirit of it) is to ensure that someone can't distort the game with a real world gain (such as ebay isk sellers). BLINK does not do that, it's strictly wealth transfer of already existing assets as opposed to spawning new assets. It helps the community like any good lottery does. So do books about how better to play the game.
But isk on ebay deflates the economy and the EULA comes into play.
So to round this out, Somer Blink was rewarded for excellence. Good for them. I hope CCP rewards excellence in the future. It is painful to me that CCP is even considering not doing so because others feel entitled to the same rewards, or worse, that the environment should be homogenous and no one should be rewarded for doing great things.
CCP, don't cave to that pressure. Rewards are good and justified in moderation.
-A |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5351
|
Posted - 2013.12.24 23:18:00 -
[1806] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:I'm pretty sure the ongoing silence from CCP tells us everything we need to know about their position. You're no fun. There are no goons. The goons; 0.0 dream is over.
Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action. ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family Advent of Fate
415
|
Posted - 2013.12.25 02:33:00 -
[1807] - Quote
Just my 2c. i think many people didn't care about the somer stuff and many somer players are sad their bonuses went. idc as i don't buy plex with cash. (i have got prizes from a Somer event)
i do think James 315 and the lead members of minerbumping deserve rewards for the life they brought to high sec. i don't mine or suicide gank.
don't give stuff to null sec alliances. i am in a null sec alliance.
I honestly don't care if somer is a scam or if they are legit. they add to the eve experiance. reward them as u will. same with minerbumping, dotlan, iph, skunkworks etc etc. The detractors are everywhere just be as open as u can and a impartial as you can. here is a list of all the fiat currencies that didn't end up at zero value.....and here is a list of the places where a currency pegged to a real commodity has successfully co-existed with compound interest....-á Here is a physics professor explaining why sustainable growth isn't a thing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY |

Bronco Platz
Intercosmic Fruit Company
129
|
Posted - 2013.12.26 10:18:00 -
[1808] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:I'm pretty sure the ongoing silence from CCP tells us everything we need to know about their position. You're no fun.
In my honest opinnion this will be no fun, but the sad truth... This signature is under NDA. Sorry. |

Bookish
Exodus Development
3
|
Posted - 2013.12.26 11:55:00 -
[1809] - Quote
still waiting for a CCP reply.
any reply, even a silly one, is better than this silence.
|

Dave Stark
3799
|
Posted - 2013.12.26 11:58:00 -
[1810] - Quote
Bookish wrote:still waiting for a CCP reply.
good luck with that. |
|

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers Test Alliance Please Ignore
610
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 06:08:00 -
[1811] - Quote
Kate stark wrote:Anya Klibor wrote:From SOMER's site:
"GTC Discount With Blink
From now until the end of 2013, receive a 10% discount on 30 and 60-Day timecodes purchased through Blink's link! Just use our link, and use the coupon code "SOMERBLINK" at checkout to receive 10% off every code.
We may have additional announcements about GTC soon, and any codes purchased since the bonus went away on November 7th will receive any future benefits retroactively."
Discount is fine. Other possibilities apparently exist for them, though. This could be interesting. so somer have made that much isk they can cash out at a lower isk -> $ ratio in order to increase volume of transactions?
There is no RMT in offering a dollar discount on GTC purchases. They are not converting any isk into cash then. They are however, potentially making more money by offering the GTC's at a discount. And ultimately, it is Markee Dragon offering the discount, not Somer, although Somer may be contributing part of their "cut" toward it.
The only question is if CCP mandates a certain retail price for the GTC's in their reseller agreement. If they do, then Markee Dragon would be in violation of this agreement.
|

Kara Roideater
172
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 11:23:00 -
[1812] - Quote
Ahlea Corinth wrote:As an executive manager at my company, we are faced with a decision each quarter on whether or not to issue bonuses to our staff members. Some things that are taken into consideration:
- Is it financially viable for the enterprise to issue bonuses - How much of a bonus pool exists if so? - What are the criteria for staff to receive bonuses? - Are bonuses discretionary (meaning subjective) or metrics based (objective, same for all) or a combination?
Employees will like it, or not like it, but we do the best we can to be fair and reward those who go far and beyond over what is expected of them and hope that bonuses inspire folks to reach for the stars during the next quarter if they want a larger share.
Now, translate that concept to here. CCP sees tremendous value in the SOMER Blink initiative and rewards it with a bunch of rare issue Scorpions. The folks at SOMER Blink don't need the isk, so to them it's a gesture alone. To CCP it's a tool at their disposal to reward those who go, in their eyes, above and beyond.
So rather than bark at CCP about recognizing what it sees as key contributors, spend your time developing your own initiative and become the next SOMER Blink and you will earn an Ishukone Scorpion too.
In terms of real world $ drawn from the BLINK initiative, it's just like law enforcement. Officers who pull someone over for speeding can choose to give a warning, a ticket, or not pull someone over at all. Discretion. CCP has the same discretion. I believe the EULA (the spirit of it) is to ensure that someone can't distort the game with a real world gain (such as ebay isk sellers). BLINK does not do that, it's strictly wealth transfer of already existing assets as opposed to spawning new assets. It helps the community like any good lottery does. So do books about how better to play the game.
But isk on ebay deflates the economy and the EULA comes into play.
So to round this out, Somer Blink was rewarded for excellence. Good for them. I hope CCP rewards excellence in the future. It is painful to me that CCP is even considering not doing so because others feel entitled to the same rewards, or worse, that the environment should be homogenous and no one should be rewarded for doing great things.
CCP, don't cave to that pressure. Rewards are good and justified in moderation.
-A
A bunch of terrible analogies here. SOMER is not an employee of CCP and comparing the situation to CCP awarding bonuses to employees is ludicrous. SOMER is an ingame entity taking part in a competitive endeavour against all the other ingame entities, with CCP playing the referee. When the referees start favouring one team for their excellence there are significant problems in a competitive game. The reward for excellence in a competitive environment is success in that environment; the introduction of externally granted prizes that not only reward the success which is already meant to be its own reward but also give ingame entitiesa competitive advantage that is unavailable to other players is the equivalent of taking a crap in the sandbox, as one player so eloquently put it. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
7892
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 13:52:00 -
[1813] - Quote
This, along with the lack of summer summit minutes for CSM 8, is pretty damn inexcusable. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

Yosef Brinalle
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 20:34:00 -
[1814] - Quote
Lets see... If I were a game Corp in EVE and I had made a couple of unfortunate calls and found myself in some financial straits i might: 1. Lay off employees at the 'unfortunate calls'. 2. Work at creating a system where other Corps gain $ by driving $ my way. 3. Remind my players that these other corps who are driving $ to me are 'contributing to the community'. 4. Freely reward those other corps with in-game goodies. In-game goodies cost me nothing as compared to marketing swag. 5. Have multiple sales on my product to generate as much extra $ as possible. This works even better if it is done in a timeframe when sales are expected and highly patronized. 6. If all this generates enough to push me back to viable then Great! Process over! Otherwise continue on to 7. 7. Take whatever ISK I have gained in 1-6 and hop a fast Leopard to planet Aruba or some nice place with no extradition treaty. 8. Send one last note to all my snubbed creditors/game players saying: "This is EVE - Your tears are delicious!" |

Brendan Anneto
Gladiators of Rage Fidelas Constans
12
|
Posted - 2013.12.28 21:05:00 -
[1815] - Quote
CCP Guard wrote:Weaselior wrote:I'd like a little more information on the SOMER lottery issue specifically as that was the really immense giveaway here and it's not really well addressed. Specifically, why an in-game business was given such immense prizes as "a fansite" that wound up making them almost certainly literally trillions of isk. It's not really addressed at all in your post: no indication of why SOMER, no indication of what process went on here and why the CSM was never consulted, no indication of what other "fansites" have gotten these sort of things.
It's not just that SOMER got the lottery gifts. It's that they were absolutely stupendously massive. There's also the seperate problem of Navigator officially declaring them Not A Scam.
The IWS issue would not have been nearly as big an issue without that: it's that both happened, and that the lottery gift to SOMER was already absurdly out of line. The IWS issue exacerbated the lottery issue, it wasn't the main problem. I can probably shed a bit of light on that although Navigator touched on that in his announcement following what was going to be the Gold Magnate event. Why SOMER? Well, they are really popular and they have supported a ton of events so we wanted to explore what we could do with them. Their influence in the community is significant for the same reason that they are space rich - because they're good at what they do. In the statement we go into who else have gotten the ISWs and also what sort of giveways we usually extend to fansites. As we said, we agree with you that we went too fast and that's why we need to re-think this whole thing. We need to keep the CSM more involved, their input is invaluable.
But what has SOMER done to enhance the game play for people and give back to the community. Take a look at EVE UNI these people bust them selves teaching newbies how to play the game. They don't take their isk and their goal is to give players experience before they move on into the galaxy. SOMER on the other hand is a FOR profit organisation that the sole purpose is to print isk for the owners. It is not a matter of popularity it is a matter of the worth of the item given and who it was given too, and the manner in which it was given. So don't try pull that trick on us saying that they give items to events and support give aways, Chribba does this as well as countless others. I'm giving you my money to play this game and put food on your tables I don't see my IWS or free Titan Proverbs 1:26-27 |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
87
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 11:06:00 -
[1816] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Thanks for the statement. However, it doesn't particularly address the glaring fact that SOMER received free trips to Fanfest and unique ships for a "fair" contest "for the community" that CCP has no control over or audit power for. Further, the contest is inherently biased toward people who blow billions of isk playing blinks, giving them a disproportionate amount of entries for unique ships only obtainable through this medium (not to mention making SOMER even more isk), as well as giving a player-run, for-profit corporation the ability to decide who can even have a chance at winning it, considering SOMER Blink solely and unilaterally has the power to ban accounts at will.
The fact that you guys earlier compared SOMER Blink to a charity is shocking, off-putting and shows a deep disconnection between what CCP believes "a community service" is and what the players do. Many players believe that "a community service" is something that actually enriches the game or provides content to it. SOMER Blink is a third party website created solely to print isk for its founder. They provide no services in game. At all. (This doesn't even to speak to the fact that serious concerns exist for many players to the legitimacy of the SOMER Blink lottery system. For example, how is it that the player with the most blinks won, Replacement 234, doesn't appear in the most blinks played? Is Replacement 234, with an win rate at a minimum of 32.7%+ simply luckier than the next-highest winner, Featious who has a 28.8% win rate? Or the highest winner (with over 9 TRILLION isk more than Replacement 234) doesn't even appear to have played or won the most blinks?)
The difference in your example of "go to game trade show, get swag" and the SOMERgate fiasco is that as players we can choose to attend game trade show--at our wills--and get swag. We don't, however, have the luxury of playing blinks if the account is banned. Further, you're not limiting the prize pool to players attending EVE Vegas, as your trade show example would indicate. It is open to anyone willing to blow billions of isk on blinks. Even then, they would still have an inequitable chance of winning against other players who have a disproportionate amount of tickets. Your basic example of simply playing a promo blink and having an entry is pedantic at best and deceitful at worst, considering that everyone knows that blink players will have hundreds or thousands of tickets entered.
It's good that you've put future plans on hold for hopefully a better process. It's unfortunate, though, that you decided to stop recognizing community sites short of providing rewards to meaningful providers of content in the game, instead opting to enrich a for-profit corp's wallet instead. The fact that you haven't pulled the unique rewards, given the glaring deficiencies in using SOMER Blink as the provider of the contest, shows me that CCP has only a passing concern to the legitimate grievances we players have. CCP owes nothing to SOMER Blink, and if this were believed by CCP, it would have pulled the unique and fantastical prizes in favor of something more traditional like PLEX packs or Collector's Editions.
This was the first response to the thread. Did anyone from CCP even bother to read it?
I think they did, they just tactically ignored it.
By the way, I love the way there is a survey out claiming that 'our opinions matter'. Well everyone who has responded to this thread knows different.
|

Dave Stark
4039
|
Posted - 2013.12.30 11:13:00 -
[1817] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:By the way, I love the way there is a survey out claiming that 'our opinions matter'. Well everyone who has responded to this thread knows different.
they said there'd be a survey for this topic, there hasn't been. |

Miss Ladybird
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
88
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 02:44:00 -
[1818] - Quote
CCP - Does our opinions matter? |

Diva Ex Machina
D'reg Spaceship Samurai
36
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 09:25:00 -
[1819] - Quote
Miss Ladybird wrote:CCP - Does our opinions matter?
It would seem not. |

Ritual Union
ykx ltd
14
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 15:10:00 -
[1820] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:I'm still scratching my head about what these "great contributions" are exactly that SB made to EVE that CCP and others keep referring to. Is out of game gambling for isk and in-game swag via a 3rd party for-profit entity considered creating content?
Sexy Cakes wrote:I think my biggest problem with the whole situation is that I feel CCP is awarding a straight up gambling enterprise simply because they help sell plexes. When you give out upwards of 400+ billion ISK in rare ships to 'the house' who is already raking in ISK hand-over-fist it seems lame as hell.
   Advertising Campaign: You will not click this link, you will block this character, you will leave a lame comment in local about this link, you will eve-mail me just to say that you don't care, and remember: under no circumstances you will click this link. |
|

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
126
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 23:28:00 -
[1821] - Quote
Just a friendly reminder to CCP that all of these Somer related issues are still issues.
Anyway, Happy 2014 to all. |

Deka Ekato
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
126
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 04:16:00 -
[1822] - Quote
Still waiting  |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6047
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 04:25:00 -
[1823] - Quote
Deka Ekato wrote:Just a friendly reminder to CCP that all of these Somer related issues are still issues.
Anyway, Happy 2014 to all. Keep it up for another year. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Dave Stark
4111
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 15:30:00 -
[1824] - Quote
so i hear half of the ccp staff have gone to work for riot, guess that's why we haven't got an answer. |

Nolak Ataru
Incursion Osprey Replacement Fund LLC
53
|
Posted - 2014.01.03 15:36:00 -
[1825] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:so i hear half of the ccp staff have gone to work for riot, guess that's why we haven't got an answer.
jumping ship before it sinks... |

Dave Stark
4124
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 13:48:00 -
[1826] - Quote
Nolak Ataru wrote:Dave Stark wrote:so i hear half of the ccp staff have gone to work for riot, guess that's why we haven't got an answer. jumping ship before it sinks...
and somehow, the iceberg surprised them all... |

Dave Stark
4134
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 19:09:00 -
[1827] - Quote
Hoshi Sorano wrote:So how much tinfoil would it take to speculate that CCP Navigator was "asked" to leave, but that we'll never hear about it becuase for CCP to do so would be to admit that there was dev wrongdoing in this mess?
personally i couldn't care less about navigator leaving, there are more important questions that need answering first.
edit: managed to quote a post that doesn't exist? ok.... |
|

CCP Falcon
5498

|
Posted - 2014.01.07 11:27:00 -
[1828] - Quote
Good morning Ladies and Gents.
First off, apologies for the length of time it's taken to respond to this thread. The last couple of months have been pretty hectic with the launch of Rubicon, the Philippines PLEX for GOOD project, and a lot of other projects, as well as the holiday period for a lot of our staff, and a few changes in position and suchlike.
Firstly, I'd like to draw your attention to a thread that CCP Dolan has created in Jita Park Speaker's Corner.
We're opening a dialogue with the CSM and the community regarding this, and you guys can feel free to air your concerns in a civil and concise manner in the new thread over on the CSM forums. As CCP Dolan explains, we want to make sure that this kind of issue doesn't re-occur, and we want to make sure that we have full transparency with regards to fansite and third party support in future.
To that end, we'll be having a sit down with CSM8 at the winter summit to ensure that player concerns regarding this are brought to light, and that people have their voices heard in a clear and concise manner. As such, we've opened the thread linked above in order of people to express their opinions.
A few points of note, before you join the new discussion regarding this:
- If you're simply calling for blood, and for the banhammer to come down on people, please don't pollute the discussion with abusive or otherwise non-constructive posts. They will be removed.
- Action has been taken appropriate to our rules and policies, and details of that action are the concern of CCP and the third parties involved. We will not breach the privacy of any third party to satisfy the repetitive calls for the banhammer to be applied, or reveal actions taken by CCP on this matter, or any other.
- We appreciate the continued reports of issues similar to this, however the forums are not the place for them. If you feel that someone is violating the EULA, please file a support ticket under the appropriate category.
- We're going to be realistic here, and not make a false promise. This will be a lengthy process. You're not going to see results overnight, as we have a whole policy and framework to draft. This will take time, and will be something that if necessary, we'll carry over onto the term of CSM9 to complete.
- For now, any third party support that involves ingame assets remains suspended until this process is complete and we have a clear, transparent framework for support in place.
With the above points in mind, we would like to have an open dialogue with both the CSM and the community regarding player concerns on this issue, and we want to garner feedback and thoughts regarding third party support. This is why the summit session and the new thread have been created.
In the same respect, we expect players to come to us with concise feedback and constructive criticism. If the new thread goes the way of the old one, with pointless bumping and abusive posting, those responsible will lose their ability to contribute to the discussion. Don't spam, and the thread is stickied so don't pointlessly attempt to bump it or be disruptive to the ongoing discussion.
We realize that this is something that's a concern, we realize that this is something that a certain cross-section of the community would like to see addressed, and we realize that we need a solid, transparent framework in place going forward.
By working with us and offering us civil, concise feedback and constructive criticism, you can help us to do this.
As such, I'm closing this thread, which frankly, is a mess. It will however be kept for reference.
Please continue discussion within the forum rules in this thread.
Again, apologies for the length of time a response has taken, but we've been speaking at length internally regarding this issue.
Thanks. CCP Falcon -á || -á EVE Community Manager -á || -á EVE Illuminati
@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 .. 61 :: [one page] |