Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
93
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 13:43:00 -
[1] - Quote
I did a quick forum search to get an impression on wether or not the myrmidon would be the hull used for the t2 gallente CS. Afterall, I ran across that link posted by Tippia (I believe) : http://eve.beyondreality.se/pics/RodenMydon.jpg
Alara IonStorm wrote:I think they should change the Eos Model to a Myrmidon. They are making all 8 Combat focused anyway.
* Claymore / Cyclone * Sleipnir/ Hurricane * Astarte / Brutix * Eos / Myrmidon * Damnation / Prophecy * Absolution / Harbinger * Vulture / Ferox * Nighthawk / Drake
Then get to work on T2 Tier 3 Battlecruisers.
The Devblog for navy battlecruisers was very inconclusive, so the base question remains:
''Will the Eos ever be based on the Myrmidon?''
That's all, links to realted posts really appreciated. :) |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
211
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 13:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lloyd Roses wrote:I did a quick forum search to get an impression on wether or not the myrmidon would be the hull used for the t2 gallente CS. Afterall, I ran across that link posted by Tippia (I believe) : http://eve.beyondreality.se/pics/RodenMydon.jpgAlara IonStorm wrote:I think they should change the Eos Model to a Myrmidon. They are making all 8 Combat focused anyway.
* Claymore / Cyclone * Sleipnir/ Hurricane * Astarte / Brutix * Eos / Myrmidon * Damnation / Prophecy * Absolution / Harbinger * Vulture / Ferox * Nighthawk / Drake
Then get to work on T2 Tier 3 Battlecruisers. The Devblog for navy battlecruisers was very inconclusive, so the base question remains: ''Will the Eos ever be based on the Myrmidon?'' That's all, links to realted posts really appreciated. :)
ABC's should have been T2 to begin with they are clear specialist ships. 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
93
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jonas Sukarala wrote: ABC's should have been T2 to begin with they are clear specialist ships.
I only cited that T2 ABC part to paste something complete as it was written. I think T2 ABCs are a terrible idea. If people are already complaining about tech-IIIs with their sig+tank/gank ratio, they certainly would even more so being confronted with HACs shooting SR weaponry at 50+km AND massive dps.
I'm actually hoping that one of you ran across a sekret post somewhere that either puts a certain death to all speculations or inflames those even more. Community has been 'disappointed' with the navy brutix (navy myrm makes little to no sense anyways, as was pointed out by Fozzie I believe) and yet there hasn't been a single merciful hint I caught up with!
(disappointed cause it is not a myrm, navy brutix is amazing though) |
PavlikX
You are in da lock
65
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 16:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
I don't want replacement of absolution model. |
Syrias Bizniz
Carnivore Company
174
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 16:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
PavlikX wrote:I don't want replacement of absolution model.
Exactly, the Harbinger would look way more nasty in Khanid colors anyways. |
ExAstra
Echoes of Silence
137
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 17:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
The Myrmidon gets no love. It's not a Command ship, and it's not the Navy ship. I think it'd be neat for the Myrmidon to be the Eos. The Astarte has to be the Brutix, but an Eos Myrm would be glorious. Although I'd be sad to see the Brutix Eos go at the same time. Save the drones! |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
212
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 17:27:00 -
[7] - Quote
it would be cooler if they all got unique models loosely based off their appropriate hull so Myrm - Eos but heavily modified. 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
6207
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
This is something I've been thinking about during my predesign for the command ships.
I'll start with this disclaimer, we will never feel that we need to make hull designs match the function of every ship. So there's no NEED to switch the hulls on any command ships. This is not something we've decided to do, but it is something we could do and would like your opinions on.
It might be interesting to convert half the command ships into the other BC hull, picking the one that matches their weapon type at the T1 level.
That would (potentially) mean:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull This is the kind of thing that we'd expect many people would have strong opinions about, and since it wouldn't have direct gameplay effects we wouldn't consider it worth doing unless there was some significant community support for the idea that overwhelms the opposition.
So, hypothetically, what do you guys think? Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
DJWiggles
Eve Radio Corporation
59
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:38:00 -
[9] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull
HAVE MY BABIES NAIOW!!!!!!!!!!!!! THIS A THOUSAND TIMES YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Live on Eve Radio Wednesdays 20:00 GMT with me & friends blabbering on about Eve and stuff-áFollow me on twitter http://twitter.com/WigglesGRN, like me on facebook http://facebook.com/wigglesGRN or check out my blog http://wiggles.gamingradio.net/blog
|
Threestep
Aperture Harmonics K162
8
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
I like it. Would they still keep their corp/paint schemes? |
|
|
CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
6207
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
Threestep wrote:I like it. Would they still keep their corp/paint schemes?
Yes, they'd have the same paintjob as before, just with different hulls.
The art guys have also been slowly updating many T2 ships to have modified geometry compared to the T2 hulls, so either way someday the command ships will likely end up being a bit different, but that would likely come later. Game Designer | Team Five-0 https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
Aglais
Liberation Army Li3 Federation
296
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:40:00 -
[12] - Quote
Syrias Bizniz wrote:PavlikX wrote:I don't want replacement of absolution model. Exactly, the Harbinger would look way more nasty in Khanid colors anyways.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if that opinion is disgustingly wrong and heretical.
I wouldn't mind the Nighthawk being a T2 drake as long as they spruced it up like they did with marauders. That'd be cool. Maybe making the little bridge projection there more like the 'classic' Drake. And then throw on slick Kaalakiota color scheme. I'd actually fly that based on appearance alone. |
Elena Thiesant
Sun Micro Systems
356
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote: Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull Yes please!
|
Eli Green
The Arrow Project
676
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:42:00 -
[14] - Quote
I support this product and/or service. wumbo |
Elendar
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
48
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:This is something I've been thinking about during my predesign for the command ships.
I'll start with this disclaimer, we will never feel that we need to make hull designs match the function of every ship. So there's no NEED to switch the hulls on any command ships. This is not something we've decided to do, but it is something we could do and would like your opinions on.
It might be interesting to convert half the command ships into the other BC hull, picking the one that matches their weapon type at the T1 level.
That would (potentially) mean:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull This is the kind of thing that we'd expect many people would have strong opinions about, and since it wouldn't have direct gameplay effects we wouldn't consider it worth doing unless there was some significant community support for the idea that overwhelms the opposition.
So, hypothetically, what do you guys think?
Not sure about the slep, so iconic as it is. Rest though is an awesome idea. |
zbaaca
Republic Military Tax Avoiders
9
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull nooo. i just trained to command. i want abso stay as it is. others i don't care Bugs are opportunities to cause unprecedented amounts of destruction. --Zorgn |
Ripard Teg
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
648
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:45:00 -
[17] - Quote
I support this in the strongest possible terms.
The only reason this wasn't done before was because Command Ships pre-date the old tier2 BCs. Jester's Trek: wherein I ramble about EVE Online, gaming, and from time to time... life. |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
213
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ripard Teg wrote:I support this in the strongest possible terms.
The only reason this wasn't done before was because Command Ships pre-date the old tier2 BCs.
I support it stronger :PPP same with all T2 hulls would be awesome with unique models based on the appropriate hull. 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Wander Prian
Frozen Dawn Inc Arctic Light
6
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:50:00 -
[19] - Quote
I really like the idea. It would make the two command ships more unique and besides, drake with the red stripes= WIN! |
mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1247
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:50:00 -
[20] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Threestep wrote:I like it. Would they still keep their corp/paint schemes? Yes, they'd have the same paintjob as before, just with different hulls. The art guys have also been slowly updating many T2 ships to have modified geometry compared to the T2 hulls, so either way someday the command ships will likely end up being a bit different, but that would likely come later.
The idea of a command ship with a bunch of extra antenna and stuff makes me tingly. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |
|
IamBeastx
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
95
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:53:00 -
[21] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull Yes to EOS hull change. Yes to Abso hull change. Yes to Nighthawk hull change.
No to sleipnir hull change, this ship is far too widely known and remembered with its current hull, almost EVERY tournament and day to day fighting it gets seen.
Change the claymore hull maybe, but deffo no to sleipnir hull change imo. All my life i wanted to be someone, now i know i should have been more specific. |
AyayaPanda
15 Minute Outliers Novus Dominatum
24
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
Although fat chicken looks better than harby, I still approve this proposal. |
Joelleaveek
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
218
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:57:00 -
[23] - Quote
yes, oh please yes. |
Yaturi
The Scope Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 20:58:00 -
[24] - Quote
Yes to hull switch
Thank you Fozzie
|
Torskelrak
Vallo Nostrum Domus Imperial Outlaws.
2
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:00:00 -
[25] - Quote
Good idea. How about making the different gang link modules change the shape of the ship slightly like a moduler ship? EG. Information gang links make the ship have slightly more antenna's Armour gang links, make the ship slightly bulkier, like adding extra armour plates
Or maybe a fleet ship is slightly different to the field ship bit same hulls? |
Shu-Ning
Bei-Ge Pirates
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:00:00 -
[26] - Quote
I like that idea. Different models bring more fun.
|
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
1785
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:00:00 -
[27] - Quote
a black harb + a red harb? You are asking if we would want to have those? HELL YES! eve style bounties (done) dust boarding parties imagine there is war and everybody cloaks - join FW |
Seth Asthereun
Oscura Simmetria Yulai Federation
17
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
IamBeastx wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull Yes to EOS hull change. Yes to Abso hull change. Yes to Nighthawk hull change. No to sleipnir hull change, this ship is far too widely known and remembered with its current hull, almost EVERY tournament and day to day fighting it gets seen. Change the claymore hull maybe, but deffo no to sleipnir hull change imo.
This!!!! |
Jonas Sukarala
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
213
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:02:00 -
[29] - Quote
IamBeastx wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:
Eos would use the Myrm hull Sleipnir would use the Hurricane hull Abso would use the Harb hull Nighthawk would use the Drake hull Yes to EOS hull change. Yes to Abso hull change. Yes to Nighthawk hull change. No to sleipnir hull change, this ship is far too widely known and remembered with its current hull, almost EVERY tournament and day to day fighting it gets seen. Change the claymore hull maybe, but deffo no to sleipnir hull change imo.
i kind of agree on the no to sleipnir using the cane model i find it hard to imagine even though it should follow the cane model.. The sleipnir is quite iconic autocannon ship like the vaga. I don't think people would mind an exception in this case. 'Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the house, they are out of line' CCP Ytterbium Nerf missile range into place where is the TD missile change?-á ..projectiles should use capacitor. ABC's should be T2 HABC and nerf web strength its still too high |
Jennifer Christage
Token Industries The Yacht and Whiskey Club
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 21:03:00 -
[30] - Quote
No, the old models are iconic and should remain as they are. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 21 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |