Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 17:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok, before I post these complaints I would hope the EvE community realizes that these are not empire issues, these are pvp issues.
#1 Long ago CCP attempted to fix the decloaking from planets problem. You used to fly a covert ops cloaked ship through a planet and become decloaked, often without noticing. This was a real issue that resulted in a quick fix with no foresight of the future problems it caused.
From what it looks like, CCP literally just changed the exposure time necessary to become decloaked. By doing this, you would no longer be decloaked by a planet. Wonderful job by CCP, to just change a single number in the code and yay, all taken care of.
WRONG.... Now and for some time it has become impossible to decloak any ship that comes through a gate. It used to be that a fast ship could decloak a ship by burning towards it and getting within 2500 meters. This is no longer the case. The exposure time takes so long that if you manage to be near the cloaked ship long enough to manage a decloak, they will in all likelyhood be on their way into warp. IN FACT, you can actually BUMP a cloaked ship with i.e. a dramiel, cynabal, vaga, etc and it won't decloak even then. This has lead more and more people into using covert ops t3 because it has become so hard to decloak even a double plated ship with a covert ops subsystem.
CCP needs to go back to the code and find a different way to fix this problem. Exposure time increase has simply made traveling pilots safer unintentionally and what should have occurred instead was changing the planet surface to a non-decloaking entity.
#2 I have been observing this for some time and I do admit, its entirely possible that I can live with this change granted the first issue is corrected. It used to be when you jumped through a gate, you would be placed at some RANDOM spot around the gate at approximately 13km. This worked great because you had a chance of be placed too close to something or someone that could scram or decloak you upon warp initiation. NOW...CCP has changed the random placement to a fluid placement based on the clearest location around the gate. If you have 100 people on one side of the gate, the pilot entering system will consistently be placed on the opposite side. If you are chasing a target, it won't matter if you get ahead of him, he'll be spawned across from you making a tackle difficult to impossible.
While I admit this change isn't a game breaking problem, it does cater to the PVP avoiders, which has been happening far too long. Its time to stop giving the Carebears so many tools to avoid what the core of this game is built around, COMBAT. This change should be immediately rollbacked to its initial implementation.
Please comment on your experience with these issues and any ideas that may vary from my own.
Trolls need not respond, nor do you need to mention the literally hundreds of other changes CCP has made to cater toward the Bear.
Thanks
|
TheBreadMuncher
Boxxed Up Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 17:44:00 -
[2] - Quote
TL;DR, first is a legitimate problem, second is just people wanting everyone to be forced into PVPing. |
Valentyn3
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 17:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. I used to be a Blade Runner like you, then I took an android to the knee... |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
340
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 17:51:00 -
[4] - Quote
Don't forget the "fix" that allows directors and CEOs to kick corp members while they are logged on and in space meaning that two corpmates who are shooting eachother can get concorded without warning if someone decides to kick one of them from corp. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
TheBreadMuncher wrote:TL;DR, first is a legitimate problem, second is just people wanting everyone to be forced into PVPing.
Thank you for your response. I don't believe that the 2nd is forcing pvp on people, its a chance based spawn. It gives an equal chance that they spawn far away as it does that they spawn close. I only seek it to be fair to both parties, not lopsided toward one. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man.
Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after?
It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance.
Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:07:00 -
[7] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Don't forget the "fix" that allows directors and CEOs to kick corp members while they are logged on and in space meaning that two corpmates who are shooting eachother can get concorded without warning if someone decides to kick one of them from corp.
While I don't like that fix either, I am trying to focus on these 2 simple issues. Thank you for your response nonetheless. |
baltec1
646
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after? It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance. Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant.
THeres a guy in my corp who has damn near 100% chance to decloak frigs. Calling you out on your not trying. |
Roll Sizzle Beef
47
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
Spawn camping is a weak bottleneck game mechanic perpetrated by the engine. People cant help having to work with what they are given. CCP just cant think of any other way to narrow down the vastness of space so people meet. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:11:00 -
[10] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after? It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance. Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant. THeres a guy in my corp who has damn near 100% chance to decloak frigs. Calling you out on your not trying.
Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad. |
|
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
360
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:12:00 -
[11] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:#2 I have been observing this for some time and I do admit, its entirely possible that I can live with this change granted the first issue is corrected. It used to be when you jumped through a gate, you would be placed at some RANDOM spot around the gate at approximately 13km. This worked great because you had a chance of be placed too close to something or someone that could scram or decloak you upon warp initiation. NOW...CCP has changed the random placement to a fluid placement based on the clearest location around the gate. If you have 100 people on one side of the gate, the pilot entering system will consistently be placed on the opposite side. If you are chasing a target, it won't matter if you get ahead of him, he'll be spawned across from you making a tackle difficult to impossible.
That's interesting! I didn't know that! So tell me if this seems sound: If I wanted to set up a gatecamp and instead of a drag bubble just catch people coming through a gate, I could litter the gate with cans but leave one section clear, and thus be assured of where the incoming ship will materialize? Is that right?
|
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:14:00 -
[12] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:#2 I have been observing this for some time and I do admit, its entirely possible that I can live with this change granted the first issue is corrected. It used to be when you jumped through a gate, you would be placed at some RANDOM spot around the gate at approximately 13km. This worked great because you had a chance of be placed too close to something or someone that could scram or decloak you upon warp initiation. NOW...CCP has changed the random placement to a fluid placement based on the clearest location around the gate. If you have 100 people on one side of the gate, the pilot entering system will consistently be placed on the opposite side. If you are chasing a target, it won't matter if you get ahead of him, he'll be spawned across from you making a tackle difficult to impossible.
That's interesting! I didn't know that! So tell me if this seems sound: If I wanted to set up a gatecamp and instead of a drag bubble just catch people coming through a gate, I could litter the gate with cans but leave one section clear, and thus be assured of where the incoming ship will materialize? Is that right?
Haven't tried it with cans, simply because at least in empire they get scooped. Worth a try though, assuming cans even prevent cloaking now. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:15:00 -
[13] - Quote
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:Spawn camping is a weak bottleneck game mechanic perpetrated by the engine. People cant help having to work with what they are given. CCP just cant think of any other way to narrow down the vastness of space so people meet.
Again, all I want is it to be truely random where you spawn. Its not right now, its set up to make pvp fail.
I can live with it, but this change by CCP is just plain catering toward the Bear. |
Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E. Comic Mischief
464
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
If you got 100 people camping a gate and they are all on one side, you are doing it wrong. I am running for the CSM https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=779668#post779668 |
Martinez
T-Cells Moar Tears
8
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Confirming that any changes that make people avoid pvp are bad for the game.
Thumbs up to these fixes. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vincent Athena wrote:If you got 100 people camping a gate and they are all on one side, you are doing it wrong.
LOL, it was an extreme example.
Here, better example: If you are all orbiting the gate with drones out, person jumping in will end up in the greatest space available every time. |
Gregoriuses
Privateers Privateer Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:25:00 -
[17] - Quote
Word, there is more and more "issues" that are leaning towards total safety for people looking to profit without risk.
We need fixes ! |
Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
360
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Yah cans definitely still de-cloak ya. Corpses too.
Sounds like I have a fun thing to try at some point this week. So here's the plan: I'll have an alt in an indy come in and sprinkle cans and misc debris around the gate. I'll leave one section clear to the tune of about 5km of clearance in any direction (10 km diameter "clear space") from the center and bookmark that center point. I'll put an onyx 200km over the gate and cloak the alt on the other side. As soon as a blockade runner hits the gate and loads in local the onyx will swoop in to that center point of the "clear sphere" and bubble up. Even if the blockade runner is quick and lucky he'll still get decloaked by cans slow boating out of my trap. Profit. If this works you will be my hero.
Edit: The best thing you can do to get a mechanic changed is find a way to make it work for you and than abuse the hell out of it!
|
baltec1
646
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad.
http://kb.batcountry-eve.org/index.php/home/2012/1/
Last months KB. (this month is full of macks so its hard to pick out the other stuff)
As you can see there are a lot of small cloaky stuff getting killed (172 cov ops alone).
You are doing it wrong. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:34:00 -
[20] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad.
http://kb.batcountry-eve.org/index.php/home/2012/1/Last months KB. (this month is full of macks so its hard to pick out the other stuff) As you can see there are a lot of small cloaky stuff getting killed (172 cov ops alone). You are doing it wrong.
Well, you my friend have a bubble up to give you more time. I've done decloaking without the use of a bubble. So unless you are one of those suggesting that pvp shouldn't be done in low or high sec, then you aren't convincing me that I am doing it wrong. While I do see now that this change hasn't hurt 0.0 much in terms of cloaking ships running about, it does make empire and low sec travel with cloaks super safe.
So, while I do recognize that you aren't wrong, you can hopefully also see that I am not wrong either.
Maybe give me some props for being able to decloak and point ships without the use of a bubble. |
|
arcca jeth
Dark Alliance Dark Empire Alliance
73
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
i seem to have no problem getting uncloaked by good campers |
baltec1
647
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:41:00 -
[22] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Well, you my friend have a bubble up to give you more time. I've done decloaking without the use of a bubble. So unless you are one of those suggesting that pvp shouldn't be done in low or high sec, then you aren't convincing me that I am doing it wrong. While I do see now that this change hasn't hurt 0.0 much in terms of cloaking ships running about, it does make empire and low sec travel with cloaks super safe.
So, while I do recognize that you aren't wrong, you can hopefully also see that I am not wrong either.
Maybe give me some props for being able to decloak and point ships without the use of a bubble.
Can't go after the people for doing it right. For every smart cloaky zipping about there will be 100 fools in something soft and squishy with way too much isk. I have no problem with smart people taken actions to make themselves as hard to gank as possible, its only fair.
The russians keep on throwing freighters at you lot so you do need a bit of karma otherwise the ying/yang would be out of balance. |
Greening
Privateers Privateer Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 18:49:00 -
[23] - Quote
2 good points! +1 to CCP fixing these issues to provide a fair and balanced chance of de cloaking ships on gate. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 19:05:00 -
[24] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:
Well, you my friend have a bubble up to give you more time. I've done decloaking without the use of a bubble. So unless you are one of those suggesting that pvp shouldn't be done in low or high sec, then you aren't convincing me that I am doing it wrong. While I do see now that this change hasn't hurt 0.0 much in terms of cloaking ships running about, it does make empire and low sec travel with cloaks super safe.
So, while I do recognize that you aren't wrong, you can hopefully also see that I am not wrong either.
Maybe give me some props for being able to decloak and point ships without the use of a bubble.
Can't go after the people for doing it right. For every smart cloaky zipping about there will be 100 fools in something soft and squishy with way too much isk. I have no problem with smart people taken actions to make themselves as hard to gank as possible, its only fair. The russians keep on throwing freighters at you lot so you do need a bit of karma otherwise the ying/yang would be out of balance.
Yeah, until CCP releases the cloaking jump freighter. |
baltec1
647
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 19:08:00 -
[25] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:[quote=baltec1]
Yeah, until CCP releases the cloaking jump freighter.
I would laugh at the very idea of this buut after they gave us the titans... |
Rommell Drako
We Are So Troubled Everyone Runs Screaming Moar Tears
12
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 00:08:00 -
[26] - Quote
it is sad when you have a dram bump throu a cloaked target on a gate and it still warping cloaked...
Ive seen this in 00 (with out bubbles), low, and high sec. Hope something good comes from this thread. |
Large Collidable Object
morons.
1136
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 00:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Could anyone please point out the appropriate patch notes? I usually read them, but can't remember reading about the changes mentioned in the op. morons- sting like a butterfly and-ápost like a bee. |
Lady Aja
23
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 01:01:00 -
[28] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after? It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance. Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant. THeres a guy in my corp who has damn near 100% chance to decloak frigs. Calling you out on your not trying. Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad.
dude if you really bumped a cloaked ship and didnt see it happen.. did it really happen? if so how can you prove it? |
Ris Dnalor
Black Rebel Rifter Club
223
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 01:13:00 -
[29] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:Spawn camping is a weak bottleneck game mechanic perpetrated by the engine. People cant help having to work with what they are given. CCP just cant think of any other way to narrow down the vastness of space so people meet. Again, all I want is it to be truely random where you spawn. Its not right now, its set up to make pvp fail. I can live with it, but this change by CCP is just plain catering toward the Bear.
drop cans ( or position ships )at 5 of the 6 cardinal points of the gate, that should leave the 6th cardinal point of the gate the most barren, and should dictate where the ship will appear. sit close to the gate but within disruptor range of the area.
If what you're saying is true, then the result will be easier gate camping, not harder.
o/
Save the Miners! |
Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 01:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:TheBreadMuncher wrote:TL;DR, first is a legitimate problem, second is just people wanting everyone to be forced into PVPing. Thank you for your response. I don't believe that the 2nd is forcing pvp on people, its a chance based spawn. It gives an equal chance that they spawn far away as it does that they spawn close. I only seek it to be fair to both parties, not lopsided toward one.
This kind of game play is the equivalent to spawn camping in a fps in a poorly designed map. The only kind of people who get enjoyment out of such a system are the gang bangers who are spawn camping. And as we all know, only 4 out of 5 people enjoy gang bangs. |
|
Surge Roth
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
38
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 01:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Lady Aja wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after? It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance. Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant. THeres a guy in my corp who has damn near 100% chance to decloak frigs. Calling you out on your not trying. Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad. dude if you really bumped a cloaked ship and didnt see it happen.. did it really happen? if so how can you prove it?
Space Ghosts |
Ptraci
StoneWall Metals Productions Bloodbound.
334
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 01:55:00 -
[32] - Quote
Get a sabre. Go to nullsec. Learn to pvp instead of asking for the game to be changed to make it easier for you to get cheap thrills. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 16:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Get a sabre. Go to nullsec. Learn to pvp instead of asking for the game to be changed to make it easier for you to get cheap thrills.
Only took 2 pages for someone to try to assert their 0.0 superiority over me.
Give me a break, your 9 and 29 record shows that you surely know your pvp more than I. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 16:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lady Aja wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:baltec1 wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Oh noes, you have to actually try to get gate camp kills. You poor, poor man. Have you ever tried to decloak anyone before this issue or after? It went from about a 20% chance if you were very good at it to a 1% chance. Saying that I am not trying is just ignorant. THeres a guy in my corp who has damn near 100% chance to decloak frigs. Calling you out on your not trying. Dude, I can bump cloaked ships and they don't decloak. So, if he does do a great job at it now, vs before this fix, I'd honestly want to know what he uses, because a dramiel with snakes can't even get the job done. I have a feeling you may be exaggerating just a tad. dude if you really bumped a cloaked ship and didnt see it happen.. did it really happen? if so how can you prove it?
Umm, how about a ship traveling 12km/s and suddenly bouncing off an apparent invisible wall? What proof do you want exactly? |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 17:06:00 -
[35] - Quote
Ris Dnalor wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:Spawn camping is a weak bottleneck game mechanic perpetrated by the engine. People cant help having to work with what they are given. CCP just cant think of any other way to narrow down the vastness of space so people meet. Again, all I want is it to be truely random where you spawn. Its not right now, its set up to make pvp fail. I can live with it, but this change by CCP is just plain catering toward the Bear. drop cans ( or position ships )at 5 of the 6 cardinal points of the gate, that should leave the 6th cardinal point of the gate the most barren, and should dictate where the ship will appear. sit close to the gate but within disruptor range of the barren area. If what you're saying is true, then the result will be easier gate camping, not harder, as you can dictate where the ship will be more likely to appear with just a little prep time. and of course, if enough people do this ( assuming it works ) I bet your random spawn will return quite soon. o/
So the answer is to exploit the current system to get back the right system?
First off, I rarely sit on a gate long enough to distribute cans around the gate for a pvp advantage.
Second, why should I have to change the way I play for CCP to make a change? Since when did these carebears change their style of play? They just whine and complain without any solid reasoning. |
Cosmo Raata
T-Cells Moar Tears
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 17:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Could anyone please point out the appropriate patch notes? I usually read them, but can't remember reading about the changes mentioned in the op.
They never mentioned them.
There is a lot CCP does with good intentions but never announces their actions for fear of reprisal. |
Ptraci
StoneWall Metals Productions Bloodbound.
335
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 00:34:00 -
[37] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:
Give me a break, your 9 and 29 record shows that you surely know your pvp more than I.
Yeah I don't have 5 other EVE accounts. I hope you base all your decisions on what you read on killboards. |
Hainnz
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
95
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 01:12:00 -
[38] - Quote
Your corp name is very appropriate.
|
Nephilius
Grey Legionaires
320
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 01:50:00 -
[39] - Quote
I'm really not sure if you are serious about the gate spawning part or not...part of me thinks it's a horrible troll. The other part of me thinks it's tears over carebears not dropping in your lap.
I'm not trying to be a d-bag about it, but I can't help but feel like I can't really put it any other way. I know I'm not a very good PvPer, but there has to be a great many ways to deal with something like this. Maybe posting up on a gate in a pattern or something, or even trying to guess where your quarry is going to go and beat them there. Isn't that what makes Eve fun? Trying to outwit both the game and your opponent? I loved those days when I was into that...nothing like overcoming the odds and being rewarded for doing so. To stand before a man at an inquisition, knowing that he will rejoice when we die, knowing that he will commit us to the stake and its horrors without a moment's hesitation or remorse if we do not satisfy him, is not an experience much less cruel because our inquisitor does not whip us or rack us or shout at us. |
Soldarius
United Highsec Front The 99 Percent
159
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 03:47:00 -
[40] - Quote
I was thinking of trolling this thread. But then I thought about the last time I busted a nulsec gate camp, and realized that I did indeed spawn in an area of least population. That is only 1 report. But it did happen.
As far as getting decloaked by some random object while in warp, it has happened to me only once since Crucible. "How do you kill that which has no life?" |
|
Serene Repose
Perkone Caldari State
289
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 06:11:00 -
[41] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Trolls need not respond, nor do you need to mention the literally hundreds of other changes CCP has made to cater toward the Bear.
Thanks
I detect an attempt to control community speech. You're welcome.
Smokestack lightnin' shinin' just like gold. |
TS5P
Interstellar Brotherhood of Gravediggers The 0rphanage
5
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 19:56:00 -
[42] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: Second, why should I have to change the way I play for CCP to make a change? Since when did these carebears change their style of play? They just whine and complain without any solid reasoning.
Exactly. Well said. |
Wacktopia
Noir. Noir. Mercenary Group
194
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 21:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Cosmo Raata wrote:#2 I have been observing this for some time and I do admit, its entirely possible that I can live with this change granted the first issue is corrected. It used to be when you jumped through a gate, you would be placed at some RANDOM spot around the gate at approximately 13km. This worked great because you had a chance of be placed too close to something or someone that could scram or decloak you upon warp initiation. NOW...CCP has changed the random placement to a fluid placement based on the clearest location around the gate. If you have 100 people on one side of the gate, the pilot entering system will consistently be placed on the opposite side. If you are chasing a target, it won't matter if you get ahead of him, he'll be spawned across from you making a tackle difficult to impossible.
That's interesting! I didn't know that! So tell me if this seems sound: If I wanted to set up a gatecamp and instead of a drag bubble just catch people coming through a gate, I could litter the gate with cans but leave one section clear, and thus be assured of where the incoming ship will materialize? Is that right?
Cans to de cloak = exploit? I thought prople petitioned that kind of thing. Vote Alekseyev Karrde for CSM7. -áhttps://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=67574 Get War Decs, Sov, Low Sec that works.-á |
Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
924
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 21:07:00 -
[44] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote: #1 Long ago CCP attempted to fix the decloaking from planets problem. You used to fly a covert ops cloaked ship through a planet and become decloaked, often without noticing. This was a real issue that resulted in a quick fix with no foresight of the future problems it caused.
I have an abnormally high rate of uncloaking things while doing 'things'. This isn't a game design issue, this is a ****** player issue. Try Harder.
Just because you and yours suck at it, doesn't mean its broken by design.
Cosmo Raata wrote: #2 I have been observing this for some time and I do admit, its entirely possible that I can live with this change granted the first issue is corrected. It used to be when you jumped through a gate, you would be placed at some RANDOM spot around the gate at approximately 13km. This worked great because you had a chance of be placed too close to something or someone that could scram or decloak you upon warp initiation. NOW...CCP has changed the random placement to a fluid placement based on the clearest location around the gate. If you have 100 people on one side of the gate, the pilot entering system will consistently be placed on the opposite side. If you are chasing a target, it won't matter if you get ahead of him, he'll be spawned across from you making a tackle difficult to impossible.
This is random, get better control of your people, and have them spread on a gate- If this is a problem for your camp, the obvious call would be to get someone in a Lachesis and another in a Huginn... You could even keep your current T3 Doctrine and swap some subsystems around.
Edit- Actually 3 of my losses in the last 2 months have been directly opposite to your claim, and landing literally with 2000m of a insta-hic or some other fast tackle. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
The Suicide Kings Test Alliance Please Ignore
924
|
Posted - 2012.02.24 21:18:00 -
[45] - Quote
Wacktopia wrote:Cans to de cloak = exploit? I thought prople petitioned that kind of thing.
Cans to decloak or over using bubbles to cover large areas are no longer an exploit.
Its an exploit if it adds unnecessary lag to a system (which after the server upgrades and TiDi) would take alot.. Several CFC types anchored 60 T2 Large Bubbles, and dropped close to 400 cans around the Torrinos gate in EC- with zero change to game performance (from anyone, in a 80 man fleet).
Slosh Ops, Best Ops Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
315
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:18:00 -
[46] - Quote
Why didn't they just implement something in their tick loop like:
if (IsShipInWarp()) { DisableDecloakDetection(); }
As of now if they only disable planets uncloak then you risk warping thru i.e. a Titan and getting uncloaked in the process.
Another finer check would be:
if (IsShipInWarp() && ShipSpeed > DETECT_SPEED) { DisableDecloakDetection(); }
So that you will be uncloaked if you are say below 50 km / s. That would uncloak the ship when it's almost stopped from a warp and still goes thru a big ship. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
Ladie Harlot
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1664
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Cosmo Raata wrote:Trolls need not respond
Heh
The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet. |
DarkAegix
Acetech Systems
962
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:30:00 -
[48] - Quote
OP is butthurt that his 100-man gatecamp missed out on an Ibis kill.
Does this mean that an Ibis pilot is superior in skill and intellect to the OP and 99 of his buddies combined? Most likely. |
Akirei Scytale
Test Alliance Please Ignore
940
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 01:36:00 -
[49] - Quote
GATECAMPS ARE SO IMPORTANT HURF BLURF A vote for Akirei is a vote for Awesome! |
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
411
|
Posted - 2012.02.26 16:46:00 -
[50] - Quote
Gate camper tears...best tears! We want breast augmentations and sluttier clothing in the NeX! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |