|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.04.28 23:32:00 -
[1]
I support it, but we all know that some kind of improvement to the scanning system has to happen before local chat is dropped. CCP has stated something along those lines in the past.
The most basic thing that has to happen is automatic Scanner updates - similar to current Overview model. Perhaps even integration of 15 AU Scanner data into Overview
Because otherwise, all the competitive people would have to spam the Scan button every second. CCP doesn't want that, and players definitely would not be happy about having to do that.
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 18:06:00 -
[2]
This will bring more skill to EVE PvP
which means that people who learn the game well become better than other people, no matter what they do - roam, blob, or farm
It will also make the game more exciting, there will be higher thrill level.
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.04.29 20:57:00 -
[3]
I say we should remove local from SEVERAL 0.0 regions first, increase rewards to adjust for higher risks. Then all the lazy bears can move to old style 0.0, while people who crave more excitement and better money opportunities would come to new 0.0
Both groups can have what they want.
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 21:27:00 -
[4]
I think we should seriously discuss proposal of adding/changing several 0.0 regions with no local, with minor to no scanner improvements. Then when scanner is redesigned significantly and the performance of new 0.0 is evaluated, further discussion should take place on converting all of 0.0 to no local.
This would be a more reasonable request than the current "all or nothing" approach
Maybe call the new no local regions as -1, and since they should be richer than other 0.0, have all systems there be -1 true sec
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.05.03 23:32:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Orree
Originally by: Deja Thoris Edited by: Deja Thoris on 28/04/2010 23:26:12 I don't support this. In its current incarnation eve isnt reaady for it.
It works in wormholes since there are limited and hard to find entries and exits.
With a proposal like this with eve in its current form it would just be local full of cloaky ***gots screaming "boom headshot!!!" every time someone enters local because the game offers no intel tools other than a half baked directional scanner.
Edit: Where the heck is the thumb down!?
While I'm not opposed to the greater concept of "no local" in 0.0 or low sec, I agree with Deja on this.
:thumbsdown:
OK lets separate the pussies from hardcore people with new regions. Nobody will force you into big scary no-local space, just don't let your fear get in the way of other people's fun
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 00:21:00 -
[6]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2
Originally by: Ephemeron OK lets separate the pussies from hardcore people with new regions. Nobody will force you into big scary no-local space, just don't let your fear get in the way of other people's fun
Confirming that those wanting a balanced implementation are pussies.
Since when is refusal to change status-quo considered wanting a balanced implementation?
that's like the Republicans on healthcare.
My argument was against people who want to do nothing.
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 01:20:00 -
[7]
Quote: Perhaps if you read Deja's post instead of spewing mindless and childish insults you'd have noticed he is actually FOR a change of the status quo. He even goes as far as suggesting AN IDEA, which you simply refute with "BAH, YUR A *****", instead of adding to it or being somewhat more open. A change like this NEEDS BALANCE, Whether you like it or not.
I have read his post carefully again. I see no proposal for change. I only see a refusal for change.
This is exactly the Republican defense strategy - deny everything, create an illusion of alternative plan, never show it to anyone, refuse to cooperate, stall.
If you manage to come up with a balanced proposal that's not meant to be unattainable for hope of failure, I'll apologize for being too cynical.
|
Ephemeron
Caldari Provisions
|
Posted - 2010.05.04 19:22:00 -
[8]
Quote: I said I support the concept of it because I agree it would be fun (read: I'm not scared). I simply said I do not think the game in its current state will support a reasonable implementation of what is being requested.
And do you also believe that a couple new no-local 0.0 regions should NOT be added, because if you can't enjoy them, nobody else can?
|
|
|
|