Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 .. 17 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1042
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:26:00 -
[451] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:[And you're the only one. Because we also declared war on you. And you have it opened and have 38 allies.
I mean, you've also stated you'll spend the 3.5 *10^18 ISK to keep those allies in 1.1. Stating it doesn't make that plausible. If they'll pay to give us more targets, that would be great. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Khanh'rhh
Sudden Buggery
1348
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:27:00 -
[452] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about.
WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!! - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Lord Zim
811
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:28:00 -
[453] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about.
WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!! But see, even if that was literally quoted, word for word, from Issler's mail, it was misquoted and misinterpreted because it would just be silly to say the entire CSM and CCP and CFC and other TLAs starting with C were just ganging up on poor wittle Issler. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:29:00 -
[454] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about.
WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!! Tsk tsk. Just because Pandemic Legion was nearby and felt an itch to shoot some structures. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:29:00 -
[455] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler
You should go back to making the "we are being attacked by the CSM" posts those were more funny. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:29:00 -
[456] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about.
WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!! But see, even if that was literally quoted, word for word, from Issler's mail, it was misquoted and misinterpreted because it would just be silly to say the entire CSM and CCP and CFC and other TLAs starting with C were just ganging up on poor wittle Issler. That's Issler for you. Someone copy the whole mail, by the way? We need that important [citation]. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3524
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:30:00 -
[457] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote: I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests.
Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread.
Issler
I take it you're not willing to defend Two Step from Jade's accusations then, and will happily trash a well-respected CSM member because it's in line with changes you want pushed through for your own personal benefit? |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:30:00 -
[458] - Quote
Quote:Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. I stopped ratting, this thread delivers so much more than just mere isk/hour can compensate me for. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2086
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:31:00 -
[459] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler You're the only one, as far as I can tell. Mea culpa for forgetting you were on the CSM. Forgive me if I think it's because we also declared war on you. And you have it opened and have 38 allies. I mean, you've also stated you'll spend the 3.5 *10^18 ISK to keep those allies in 1.1. Stating it doesn't make that plausible.
You made up the number, I said I'd pay for the most effective allies, likely the top four. But nice try.
So if you don't care about war decs why care that I have 38 allies? And thanks for letting me know the number, I lost track a while back!
Issler |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1045
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:31:00 -
[460] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Issler I take it you're not willing to defend Two Step from Jade's accusations then, and will happily trash a well-respected CSM member because it's in line with changes you want pushed through for your own personal benefit? No way, this has never happened be---
oh, ok, tossing people under online forums buses occurs all the time. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd |
|
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
59
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:33:00 -
[461] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler You're the only one, as far as I can tell. Mea culpa for forgetting you were on the CSM. Forgive me if I think it's because we also declared war on you. And you have it opened and have 38 allies. I mean, you've also stated you'll spend the 3.5 *10^18 ISK to keep those allies in 1.1. Stating it doesn't make that plausible. You made up the number, I said I'd pay for the most effective allies, likely the top four. But nice try. So if you don't care about war decs why care that I have 38 allies? And thanks for letting me know the number, I lost track a while back! Issler
I don't care that you have 38 allies, I think its funny that you and jade tinpost so many stupid things over it.
|
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2086
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:34:00 -
[462] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler You're the only one, as far as I can tell. Mea culpa for forgetting you were on the CSM. Forgive me if I think it's because we also declared war on you. And you have it opened and have 38 allies. I mean, you've also stated you'll spend the 3.5 *10^18 ISK to keep those allies in 1.1. Stating it doesn't make that plausible. You made up the number, I said I'd pay for the most effective allies, likely the top four. But nice try. So if you don't care about war decs why care that I have 38 allies? And thanks for letting me know the number, I lost track a while back! Issler I don't care that you have 38 allies, I think its funny that you and jade tinpost so many stupid things over it.
I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along.
Issler
|
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1048
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:34:00 -
[463] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:I don't care that you have 38 allies, I think its funny that you and jade tinpost so many stupid things over it. Boat can practice his station camping in highsec, far far away from the rest of nullsec.
I like the idea. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Marconus Orion
Massive PVPness Psychotic Tendencies.
69
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:36:00 -
[464] - Quote
/brings out fresh bowl of popcorn
Anyone? I kept the butter and salt separate so each of you can make it how you like. |
Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:37:00 -
[465] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about. WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!!
Here's a solid way to work it - move the Jade Constantine and Issler Dainze characters and obvious alts into a few alt corps, and compile which if your ~80 allies actually has managed to land kills on us during these wonderful few weeks (I recommend RNT Initiatives, they managed to pull a very nice kill on me by psychically predicting my movements: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13678986 . I must admit you have some talented allies.). Between you both and how much The Mittani feels like spending on vanity wardecs, you can probably scrounge up a dozen wardecs over 4 corps for 120m isk. That should be plenty to pick up the groups that actually get results.
Issler, specifically: You should congratulate Ivan and Vortexo for making it out to VFK, though I suggest they start working both sides of the I30 gate, rather than both AFKing in the same system. That was generally Pandemic Legion's modus operandi, and most hostile groups since then have also worked that particular gate. You might also want to talk to Ivan about fits - Drake generally passive tank in PvP, and fit damage mods. If you look for public mirrors of our wiki, the fits suggested there are still pretty robust.
|
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:37:00 -
[466] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote: I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along.
Issler
[Citation Required] |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2087
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:38:00 -
[467] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Weaselior wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Issler I take it you're not willing to defend Two Step from Jade's accusations then, and will happily trash a well-respected CSM member because it's in line with changes you want pushed through for your own personal benefit? No way, this has never happened be--- oh, ok, tossing people under online forums buses occurs all the time.
Sorry, I block Weaselior in the forums most of the time so I missed that, but I have said several times and just said it again, I don't think this change came from some secret brain control of CCP or the CSM from mittens or anyone else. CCP believes this to be the best improvement and came to that conclusion on their own.
Hope that is clear enough for you now.
Issler |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2087
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:38:00 -
[468] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote: I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along.
Issler
[Citation Required]
Citation citing the need for citation before a citation can be provided.
Issler |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1048
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:38:00 -
[469] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Here's a solid way to work it - move the Jade Constantine and Issler Dainze characters and obvious alts into a few alt corps, and compile which if your ~80 allies actually has managed to land kills on us during these wonderful few weeks (I recommend RNT Initiatives, they managed to pull a very nice kill on me by psychically predicting my movements: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13678986 . I must admit you have some talented allies.). Between you both and how much The Mittani feels like spending on vanity wardecs, you can probably scrounge up a dozen wardecs over 4 corps for 120m isk. That should be plenty to pick up the groups that actually get results. Issler, specifically: You should congratulate Ivan and Vortexo for making it out to VFK, though I suggest they start working both sides of the I30 gate, rather than both AFKing in the same system. That was generally Pandemic Legion's modus operandi, and most hostile groups since then have also worked that particular gate. You might also want to talk to Ivan about fits - Drake generally passive tank in PvP, and fit damage mods. If you look for public mirrors of our wiki, the fits suggested there are still pretty robust. It was so much *simpler* when you just let them have 48 allies.
Why does EVE have to force such hard decisions on people. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:39:00 -
[470] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:La Nariz wrote:I don't care that you have 38 allies, I think its funny that you and jade tinpost so many stupid things over it. Boat can practice his station camping in highsec, far far away from the rest of nullsec. I like the idea.
He should use eve-voice and it should broadcast to all the people in that system. |
|
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:40:00 -
[471] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote: I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along.
Issler
[Citation Required] Citation citing the need for citation before a citation can be provided. Issler
How about that mail regarding the CSM attacking you? |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1048
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:40:00 -
[472] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along. [Citation Required] Wait, doesn't that make you a CFC alt? Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1048
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:41:00 -
[473] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:La Nariz wrote:[Citation Required] Citation citing the need for citation before a citation can be provided. Issler How about that mail regarding the CSM attacking you? Oh I think I can dig it up somewhere.... Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord
2087
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:42:00 -
[474] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:Khanh'rhh wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:Jade, your stated position is 'Keep infinite free allies'. Then, when this was explained as really, really bad, you changed it to 'keep infinite free allies up until the number of characters on the defender side of the war equals the number in the attacker's side', entirely ignoring the concept of corp-hopping.
I've yet to see anyone from the CSM defend either of those positions. Them saying the 1.1 changes aren't a great final fix to the whole mercenary/allies system is very different from them agreeing with you. This isn't a binary debate. Our position, for its part, is 'we don't care, but you, Jade Constantine, are a bad poster and entirely too much fun to rile up.' Given that we're on EVE-O thread 3, and 1 EVE NEWS 24 article later, it's been a good week for you typing words.
I mean, this is the EVE-O general forums. Top secret plans will doubtless be discussed in other channels so it won't be neccessary to infiltrate simply for the purpose of listening. I'm a CSM and I've basically supported what Jade has suggested several times in fact. I believe allies should be free up to a point based on the size of the opponent. The fees for extras in a manner that the fees are passed to the mercs you could hire. So pretty much the same as Jade suggests. Again, amazed at the goon ratio of posters in this thread. Issler I'm *not* amazed that the only 2 people directly supporting the "Jade plan" just happen~ to have been wardecced by the same entity that neither can help but go into paranoid shitposting about. WE ARE LITTLERALLY[sic] BEING ATTACKED BY THE CSM!!!!!!! Here's a solid way to work it - move the Jade Constantine and Issler Dainze characters and obvious alts into a few alt corps, and compile which if your ~80 allies actually has managed to land kills on us during these wonderful few weeks (I recommend RNT Initiatives, they managed to pull a very nice kill on me by psychically predicting my movements: http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=13678986 . I must admit you have some talented allies.). Between you both and how much The Mittani feels like spending on vanity wardecs, you can probably scrounge up a dozen wardecs over 4 corps for 120m isk. That should be plenty to pick up the groups that actually get results. Issler, specifically: You should congratulate Ivan and Vortexo for making it out to VFK, though I suggest they start working both sides of the I30 gate, rather than both AFKing in the same system. That was generally Pandemic Legion's modus operandi, and most hostile groups since then have also worked that particular gate. You might also want to talk to Ivan about fits - Drake generally passive tank in PvP, and fit damage mods. If you look for public mirrors of our wiki, the fits suggested there are still pretty robust.
Thanks for calling out Ivan and Vortexo! I loved their recent adventure out your way. Medals will certainly be the result! I'll pass on the fitting suggestions!
If only most goon posts were this reasoned! We could have a dialog!
Issler |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:42:00 -
[475] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:La Nariz wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I've also said repeatedly while I don't like the change, I don't believe it was some sort of conspiracy. No tinfoil here, move along. [Citation Required] Wait, doesn't that make you a CFC alt?
Yes we are all secretly alts. |
Krios Ahzek
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
908
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:43:00 -
[476] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:
Sorry, I block Weaselior in the forums most of the time
You monster
why are you even on these forums
-áThough All Men Do Despise Us |
Kyle Myr
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
285
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:43:00 -
[477] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:You made up the number, I said I'd pay for the most effective allies, likely the top four. But nice try. So if you don't care about war decs why care that I have 38 allies? And thanks for letting me know the number, I lost track a while back! Issler
The number isn't pulled from a hat - I've been tracking allies for a while using CCP Punkturis' wonderful new war history interface. I think 38 is the latest count from the GSF vs Honda Accord war, but I might be out of date. I did take a minute to actually sum the costs of paying for all of those wardecs, but I'd done the math back when you had 36 decs, when it would've been that amount.
I redid it. For 38 you'd need 1.37439*10^19. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1048
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:43:00 -
[478] - Quote
La Nariz wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Wait, doesn't that make you a CFC alt? Yes we are all secretly alts. Some of us are openly CFC mains though. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
La Nariz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
62
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:43:00 -
[479] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:If only most goon posts were this reasoned! We could have a dialog!
Issler
If only most pubbie posts weren't summed up by this quote from Macbeth:
"It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury signifying nothing."
Then there might be a dialog going on. |
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2089
|
Posted - 2012.06.18 21:44:00 -
[480] - Quote
Cutter Isaacson wrote:La Nariz wrote:Who wants to place bets when the puppet master defense will come out? I want to place a bet on how long it takes for Jade to get banned for rumour posting, incessant personal attacks, asshattery, idiocy, poop stirring and a lack of good grace.
Honestly, I doubt it will happen. All Jade is doing is winding up GS by trolling them, and trolling is situation normal on these forums.
I'm just not sure why they are playing into it this time. Usually our esteemed GS members see through it long before it gets to this point.
Either way, on with the drama. When I check troll in the dictionary, it has a photo shopped picture of you standing somewhere in the vicinity of a point.
Also, I can kill you with my brain. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 .. 17 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |