Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. so new fb damage - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Khefron on 25/11/2010 04:59:53 If you were to keep the explosion radius on Fighter Bombers the same, but reduce the explosion velocity to roughly 30, that would have the desired effect on moving sub capitals. As it stands now, the i...
- by Khefron - at 2010.11.25 04:59:00
|
2. New Dev Blog: Account Security and You! - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tell us how you arrived at that magical name "CCP Sreegs".
- by Khefron - at 2010.11.19 17:49:00
|
3. New Dev Blog: The ALL CAPS Ships Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Abathur Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Presently on TQ if you siege a dread while it is moving at all, it will not stop until it exits siege. Making close range weapons in any medium to large scale capital e...
- by Khefron - at 2010.01.23 07:56:00
|
4. Hello Goonswarm: My Name Is Hate - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Khefron on 12/01/2010 07:53:22 Edited by: Khefron on 12/01/2010 07:49:36 I am literally h8tler
- by Khefron - at 2010.01.12 07:48:00
|
5. Capital Ships in Dominion 1.1 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't suppose you guys could make guided missile precision apply to Citadel Cruise Missiles, could you?
- by Khefron - at 2009.12.21 17:35:00
|
6. New Dev Blog: Capital Ships In Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Nozh, you're trolling us aren't you? There's no way a designer of this game can think that siege modules increase sig radius, that a capital weapon system is not supposed to do full damage to structures and capitals in siege, or that saying "use t...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.20 17:47:00
|
7. Massive Supercarrier nerf intentional? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Hey, We've made some further changes to super carriers after taking your feedback into consideration. It's quite understandable that the changes made were a disappointment to many of you, but I wanted to remind you...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.13 18:21:00
|
8. Dear CCP, please do not pre-nerf the Phoenix's only weapon systems. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: Khefron So long as a dreadnought using turrets isn't moving, if its target is not moving it does full damage to whatever it is shooting, regardless of tracking or signature radius. If ei...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.12 17:50:00
|
9. Dear CCP, please do not pre-nerf the Phoenix's only weapon systems. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Mashie Saldana Originally by: Larkonis TrassIer This statement is flawed. Please explain. So long as a dreadnought using turrets isn't moving, if its target is not moving it does full damage to whatever it is...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.12 15:48:00
|
10. Dear CCP, please do not pre-nerf the Phoenix's only weapon systems. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Zeveron and btw thats not true. missile precision isnt affecting citadel cruise according to selene :-) CCP on nerf rage...... Even better. That makes the rationale behind these changes even more arcane.
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.12 08:02:00
|
11. Dear CCP, please do not pre-nerf the Phoenix's only weapon systems. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Currently on Sisi, the explosion radius stats for citadel torpedoes are somewhere in the neighborhood of 2250m, and Citadel Cruises have an explosion radius of 1500m. This is hilariously bad, and will completely defeat the purpose of flying those ...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.12 06:32:00
|
12. New Blog: Upgrading and Upkeep of Sovereign Solar Systems in Dominion - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Khefron on 07/11/2009 19:14:23 if we're paying billions for our jump bridges, will we at least no longer have to keep the damned things loaded with ozone? edit: also, cosmic anomalies suck ass whose idea was it to make an upgrade...
- by Khefron - at 2009.11.07 19:12:00
|
13. Curatores Veritatis Alliance: What happened, Why we did it - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
CVA is the biggest evil in eve? Really??
- by Khefron - at 2009.10.28 21:28:00
|
14. Capital Weapons Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Khefron on 10/10/2009 17:14:13 What are the explosion radius and explosion velocities for the new Siege and Cruise missiles? Will phoenixes finally be able to shoot pos mods effectively? Originally by: Ragel Tropxe what pl...
- by Khefron - at 2009.10.10 17:11:00
|
15. Finals Predictions! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Morvyn (That's right, we are going to accidentally your whole tournament. Also: don't bother trying to spy on us and learn our setups because tbqfh we have absolutely no idea what we are going to fly on Sunday, and we only...
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.19 01:15:00
|
16. Finals Schedule posted - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
You guys messed up the bracket. Please see this thread.
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.16 02:35:00
|
17. You guys have no idea how to fill out a tournament bracket - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Why my esteemed colleague so indelicately stated was that there is an error with your finals bracketing. In your own rules you stated that the finals tournament was to follow a standardized bracket setup, much like, if not exactly like the link t...
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.16 02:29:00
|
18. Pirate ship changes for Dominion - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You've made a small error in balancing your hulls. The ashimmu, with its 8 equivalent medium laser turrets does more base laser dps than the phantasm's 6 equivalent plus a 25% damage bonus. It seems to me that a hull that is bonused for things ...
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.12 06:27:00
|
19. Rankings & Match Schedule for Qualifying Round 2 - Posted. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
A timely response is about all that can be reasonably expected.
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.08 23:05:00
|
20. Rankings & Match Schedule for Qualifying Round 2 - Posted. - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: EdFromHumanResources Edited by: EdFromHumanResources on 08/09/2009 17:12:58 I would greatly appreciate a response to the in game mail I sent to Eve Alliance Tournament in game RE: Scheduling. Mail came from BobFromMark...
- by Khefron - at 2009.09.08 20:17:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |