Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Usul78 * Give the nighthawk an extra launcher slot. * Give the vulture an extra turret (also do this to the ferox) * Change the command ship bonus on the vulture to a 5% damage bonus instead of another 10% range bonus per l...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.23 21:16:00
|
162. Something about missions that is annoying - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's been brought up before but /signed.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.23 21:12:00
|
163. Idea for turret rigs change (WARNING: little amarr love inside) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Amarr do use up faction and t2 crystals. OP: completly signed. It's not just lasers it's all weapon rigs, missile ships don't have it easier with CPU penalties. Those rigs need a buff, I'd say 1) get rid of the stacking penalty, 2) Lower the cal...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.23 21:10:00
|
164. UNFAIR CHANGES - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Eleana Tomelac Use your lows for something else, like dmg mods, you'll get more damage and your tank will be balanced with other ships of the same class... But the damage won't.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.22 17:09:00
|
165. Drake Nerf, Aftermath - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Will Stronghold [...] I thought it was clear that I wasn't serious.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.19 22:21:00
|
166. Drake Nerf, Aftermath - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 19/06/2007 08:35:22 There are very few situations where a player in a Drake would be more useful to his gang than a Myrm, Cane or Harb. The ship isn't good at solo, it's outdone in small gangs and I can't see it being...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.19 08:35:00
|
167. Caldari Carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Because that extra PDS or CPR would give you too much sustainability compared to an armor tank using rechargers. Oh wait.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.19 08:33:00
|
168. The SPR CPU use nerf is... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
First: how many drake builds use 3 LSEs? Second: T2 Passive Hardners take 14 cpu less than actives, so that's 42 CPU shaved off in a pure passive tank.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 21:29:00
|
169. The SPR CPU use nerf is... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
...stupid, to put it plainly. The Myrm and Drake are both, in my experience, PG limited with plenty of CPU leftover after fittings. This will not affect them in any way. The ships that will be hurt are smaller ships that don't have the CPU to spa...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 21:18:00
|
170. Drake Nerf, Aftermath - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yep. But missiles hit everytime, its so unfair!!!!!!!!1111
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 16:20:00
|
171. No Topic - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
No matter what happens to NOS crow won't be able to solo a BS unless he's asleep or mentally deficient. 3 Standard launchers = weak DPS.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 16:17:00
|
172. only cormack's ? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Draclira > Cormack. That is all.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 15:20:00
|
173. Drake Nerf, Aftermath - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 17/06/2007 06:28:00 Yeah but you're basing yourself on the Ferox, generally considered the worse BC of them all. Not exactly fair to compare it to a Drake (the worse t2 BC of them all, or is it?). If you compare a Dra...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 06:27:00
|
174. Drake Nerf, Aftermath - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 17/06/2007 03:05:00 I suggest everyone who calls the drake overpowered read Rod Blaine's post in this thread: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=510643&page=3
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 03:06:00
|
175. Petition: Rokh - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Macro Terrorist Some necroes are pointless and uninteresting. This one illustrates perfectly a long standing "nerf caldari" mentality in the community; hence well worth bringing back to the surface. /Tinfoil
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 02:30:00
|
176. Command Ship Nerf!? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm just glad this nerf came before I started training for a nighthawk. Ironically I got battlecruiser five the day before the nerf was announced. There goes over a million SP, weeeee...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 02:19:00
|
177. Nerfing bulkheads? Are you nuts? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Can't say I'm a big fan of these 'pre-emptive' nerfs...
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 01:53:00
|
178. CCP Please Fix This Imbalance - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Also, capital shield booster takes up 300 CPU.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 00:48:00
|
179. Petition: Rokh - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Yeah but the Rokh violates one of Eve's major game design rules: Caldari ships must suck.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.17 00:00:00
|
180. Petition: Rokh - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Give it another two months . Also: THE ROKH IS FINE.
- by Incantare - at 2007.06.16 22:12:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |