Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Discussion: Shield transporters - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Morikai Acler The inherent flaw with that logic is, all the setups I've seen for armor RR usually don't include a point if the ship doesn't have enough mid slots. Caldari don't have the low slots to effectively armor tank ...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.29 23:23:00
|
2. Wspace and yet more passive shield tanking. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 29/05/2009 12:25:40 Nevermind.
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.29 12:25:00
|
3. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Folks, An update on the two changes we are looking at in the next round of small updates: Siege Module - "Explosion Velocity Bonus" The penalty to explosion velocity is currently -92.5%, same penalty whic...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.19 22:52:00
|
4. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 11/05/2009 09:22:33 Originally by: TimMc Citadel torps already have 150km range 0_o. Cruise wouldn't be that helpful. It's not the range as much as the missile velocity. That and the lack of a choice betw...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.11 09:14:00
|
5. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Citadel torps vs moving cap ships We acknowledge that citadel torps do not perform as well as turrets against cap ships which can move. We are looking at possible changes that could help in this area, many o...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.11 00:17:00
|
6. Legion subsystems need more drone space. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The bonuses on the missile subsystem don't tell the whole story. To fit 6 launchers the Tengu makes some massive fitting sacrifices while the Legion can do so with enough grid to spare for two 1600mm plates and an mwd. That said I think it should...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.09 20:15:00
|
7. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 08/05/2009 18:36:17 From another thread: Originally by: Vitrael So I trained a Phoenix a few months ago. The moment it was ready I hopped on Sisi and started pew pewing and realized that the missiles go about ...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.08 18:31:00
|
8. Discussion: Shield transporters - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It's obvious there's something seriously wrong with shield transporters when a shield tanker has an easier time fitting large remote armor reps.
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.08 05:34:00
|
9. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You think that's bad? Explosion velocity in siege is 3.26 m/s . It badly needs fixing. For both the Phoenix and the Nag.
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.07 07:16:00
|
10. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
It makes sense for it to have less tank than the Phoenix because it has more gank. Look at it this way: with 6 mids it has a better burst tank than a moros fitting one damage mod or a rev fitting two. At the same time it can fit for full damage a...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.04 20:17:00
|
11. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Chronotis Citadel Torpedoes * velocity increased to 2,750 m/s * flight time decreased to 25 secs While the velocity increase is welcome you still haven't taken care of the main issue with citadels: explosion ...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.04 19:46:00
|
12. simple solution to contract spamming - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Agreed.
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.03 23:36:00
|
13. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
He's an alt but I am not. Your idea is terrible. Quote: All dreads have the same number of slots so learn how to count!! 2 have been taken from the highs and placed in the mid & low... which still adds up to 16 slots! And how's it overpower...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.02 10:56:00
|
14. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
You've mentioned citadel torpedoes several times but not the specific issues you are looking at. I would like to know wether you consider explosion velocity one of those issues. It is a serious problem that makes them inferior to all gun types wh...
- by Incantare - at 2009.05.01 18:44:00
|
15. Caldari need some CCP lov'in (PVP) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Quote: This is false. The Rokh is, in all ways, a better fleet ship than the Mega. If you care to use Spike, you can throw your Tracking Comps directly into tracking and have 2x the tracking the Mega has, or if you care to use faction ammo y...
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.30 21:11:00
|
16. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Beyond Horizon 100% damage bonus means 4 turrets, making it better than any other dread, how about 50-75% ? Already been covered, even with four turrets it would still be outdamaged by the rev.
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.30 19:22:00
|
17. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 30/04/2009 17:43:38 There are plenty of good suggestions in this thread but I'm afraid they're all going to be wasted as CCP once again decide to do their own thing. For the Nag: scrap the split weapon system which ma...
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.30 17:40:00
|
18. Naglfar, Captial Projectile Turrets and Citadel Torpedos - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 29/04/2009 20:01:55 You're completly missing the single biggest issue with citadels. Explosion velocity . That said I'm glad the Nag is finally getting a boost even if it's not as significant as many were expecting.
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.29 20:00:00
|
19. Nighthawks and their PG (lack of) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 29/04/2009 15:17:25 Originally by: Koniss you mean the one with a +5% implant and a powergrid rig? The implant can be dumped by pouring more isk into the setup (DB EANM are relatively cheap). Go ahead an...
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.29 15:14:00
|
20. Nighthawks and their PG (lack of) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Absolution w/ ganglink: Lows: Heat Sink II * 3 Dark Blood Armor Thermic Hardener Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II * 2 1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I Meds: Y-T8 Overcharged Hydrocarbon I Microwarpdrive Warp Disruptor II Small C...
- by Incantare - at 2009.04.28 21:26:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |