Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
121. Damnation changed again - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong If by "crap" you mean HOLY **** AWESOME, then yes, its crap. 85% lowest resist and 9000 base armor? 20,000 armor with a single 1600 plate? 87.8% average resists and 20,000 armor? 160k effective armor before...
- by Incantare - at 2007.08.14 19:15:00
|
122. Official Petition- +1 Turret Point on Ferox et al. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 06/08/2007 05:04:44 /Totally Signed. This request has been presented in so many different threads with no sign of dev attention, it is depressing. Caldari gunboats need more turret hardpoints to even remotely compet...
- by Incantare - at 2007.08.06 04:57:00
|
123. Petition: Rokh - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
What I find funny is that people were *****ing Caldari got a new role with their new BS while the other races did not. They're idiots, Caldari was the only race that did not have a fleet battleship, it made sense for that role to be introduced. An...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.22 19:36:00
|
124. Caldari Carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Abathur We're looking at the Caldari capital ships issue for the Rev 2.2 patch. There are a number of balancing tweaks in the works and I'm trying to get this one some love. Great news.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.22 19:33:00
|
125. The Phoenix Doesn't Have Enough CPU (Math Proof Inside) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Still no dev response. I'm unsurprised.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.21 02:03:00
|
126. Petition: Rokh - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hey I remember this thread. The kind of behavior displayed in the first few pages is shocking.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.21 02:01:00
|
127. Give us a damned notification of being Scrambled!!! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Not getting that message in missions cost me a rigged drake. Majorly annoying.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.17 20:15:00
|
128. Ferox is really underperforming + possible slution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Neuromandis Well, I have seen the argument as well, and I cannot say it is very meaningful to me. To each his own, of course, but my view is maybe it could fit 3 MFS, but it could never fit complete pvp gear and tank (i.e. ...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.14 00:04:00
|
129. The Phoenix Doesn't Have Enough CPU (Math Proof Inside) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: TubeChild TK421 Words go here It's simple really. Armor tankers don't have problems fitting a t2 tank. Shield tankers do. Armor tankers have more spare CPU left for their tank, which takes less CPU. You don't see a p...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 23:31:00
|
130. Faction HAMs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'm glad to hear that. What about faction citadel torps?
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 16:32:00
|
131. Faction HAMs - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 13/07/2007 16:10:07 -Faction medium blasters: in game -Faction medium rails: in game -Faction medium pulse lasers: in game -Faction medium beam lasers: in game -Faction medium autocannons: in game -Faction mediu...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 16:09:00
|
132. Caldari Carriers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Lord Loom Originally by: Najenna Your crying about CPU. OMG The real people here that should be crying are the Minmatar carrier pilots. We got the complete shaft. they (you) already are crying, just because Minm...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 14:58:00
|
133. The Phoenix Doesn't Have Enough CPU (Math Proof Inside) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 13/07/2007 11:07:30 Armor tankers don't have similar problems with grid. With maxed skills: A rev gets 812 500 grid. Two capital reps take 125 000 each, giga pulse and siege mod another 43 7500 leaving it with 125 ...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 11:06:00
|
134. Ferox is really underperforming + possible slution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I was generalizing of course but the usual argument goes this way: if the Ferox is given a sixth turret it can fit neutrons and triple magstabs, outdamaging a dual rep electron Brutix while having a stronger tank. Usually followed by "Caldari are ...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 10:27:00
|
135. Ferox is really underperforming + possible slution - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 13/07/2007 08:33:08 There have been many threads on this topic, they either: a) Get spammed by Gallente/Minmatar players who don't want to see the ship buffed for whatever reason. b) Fall into obscurity. I'm not sure...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 08:27:00
|
136. The Phoenix Doesn't Have Enough CPU (Math Proof Inside) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Read the two posts above yours. Fitting a co-proc is not a viable solution because it puts the phoenix and other shield tanked capitals at a disadvantage compared to the armor tankers who do not lose a slot.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.13 06:05:00
|
137. logistics ships in the ffa arenas? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Meh, bring some jammer friends next time.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.09 07:30:00
|
138. Faction destroyers and Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
After checking the HP difference between a Merlin and a Worm, the Worm gets about 70% more hp total. Assuming a faction destroyer would get a similar increase it would make it a lot more survivable than the standard version, but still relatively e...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.07 00:26:00
|
139. Faction destroyers and Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I wasn't saying destroyers don't have their uses but they are fragile which mixes poorly with the high price tag of faction ships. I'm sure people would still use them though and see no reason why they shouldn't be brought in.
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.06 23:30:00
|
140. Faction destroyers and Battlecruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Incantare on 06/07/2007 23:11:04 You have a point, a faction thrasher does sound appealing. But I would consider faction destroyers to be toys much like faction frigates, whereas factions BCs I would actually take into combat. ...
- by Incantare - at 2007.07.06 23:10:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |