Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
101. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kesthely wrote: To me the most useless module is the Auto targeting system II On a personal note, i find ALL mining lasers useless too, but i believe many others find them usefull ;) Mining lasers are useful because they let you do something...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 03:26:00
|
102. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
sabastyian wrote: I use the Energized layering plate on my dread and super, if neuted out and you only have a few passive mods, those last low slots are perfect to get an extra 15% armor boost with a slave clone, slot 10 and damantion bonuses. ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 03:14:00
|
103. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Endovior wrote: Also... doesn't Layered Plating also increase the armor bonus from plates? Accordingly, shouldn't there be some combination of plates + resists that makes the ehp increase from an (energized?) Layered Plating better than the mar...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 02:31:00
|
104. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote: What is really useless is defender missiles. That's a charge, not a module, so I'm afraid that can't be nominated for most useless module. Also, like you said about armor layering, Defender Missiles aren't very useful,...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 01:59:00
|
105. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Zircon Dasher wrote: Does the "New Topic" button count? Is that a ship module?
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 01:49:00
|
106. [Feedback] Most Useless Module of EVE Nomination - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
While I was browsing the market, I noticed two modules I had, for some reason, seldom ever seen used. The modules in question were Layered Plating and Energized Armor Layering Membranes, and it didn't take long for me to realize why... They're pro...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.20 01:45:00
|
107. EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jack bubu wrote: Felsusguy wrote: My issue isn't just with a specific issue. It's also with the lack of understanding that the specific issue illustrates. The author of this suggestion clearly does not understand the nuances of industry and...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.19 22:45:00
|
108. EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jack bubu wrote: Felsusguy wrote: MeBiatch wrote: Felsusguy wrote: Deserves to be buried. The concept isn't bad but the individual ideas show a terrible lack of understanding. get out You don't believe me? Then to quote just one ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.19 09:18:00
|
109. Compressed Gas? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Why would you need to compress gas? It's already far more valuable for its volume than any ore.
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.19 06:07:00
|
110. EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
MeBiatch wrote: Felsusguy wrote: Deserves to be buried. The concept isn't bad but the individual ideas show a terrible lack of understanding. get out You don't believe me? Then to quote just one example... El Digin wrote: INDUSTRY:...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.19 03:48:00
|
111. Fix drones and ECM at once - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This would turn ECM from slightly overused to completely useless. In short, no.
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.19 02:55:00
|
112. EVE Online: Revolution (0.0 THEME FOR WINTER EXPANSION) - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Jack bubu wrote: Bringing this back to the top, so it doesnt get buried :) Deserves to be buried. The concept isn't bad but the individual ideas show a terrible lack of understanding.
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.18 23:05:00
|
113. New server type! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
You really are the bearer of bad ideas, aren't you?
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.18 21:55:00
|
114. Fifth neutral faction! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Steve Martien wrote: Danika Princip wrote: You're a nullsec renter, why do you even CARE about standings? It's not like empire standings affect nullsec ISK making. i like to jumpclone back to high to do some missions if possible. the reas...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.18 20:28:00
|
115. Trial Account Scout Probe proposal - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
If the primary motivation for the idea is to discourage using multiple accounts, it's probably a bad idea. Also, if I recall correctly you can't play EVE on a trial account and a normal account at once, not on the same computer at least. CCP adde...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.18 17:32:00
|
116. Lower destroyer mass? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I don't know. The support frigates have almost as much mass, so reducing the mass on destroyers might result in them being lighter than the support frigates. Not that CCP seems to care, though. Interdictors already have less mass than the support ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.18 16:57:00
|
117. Improve visual quality - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
EVE looks fine. The graphics are good, and the aesthetics are, barring a few models, great. If any visual improvements are to be made, it should be replacing certain horribly ugly ship models.
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.17 22:08:00
|
118. Science and Industry Planning System - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
While I agree better interfaces for industry would be beneficial, I do not think a "tree" is the way to go.
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.17 04:55:00
|
119. EVE: Domination, the MMORTS - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kaerakh wrote: Felsusguy wrote: I have a terrible feeling that this idea would have been much better received if I had suggested it as an extension of EVE rather than it's own game... I have a terrible feeling that you're too attached to ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.17 01:54:00
|
120. Ideas to improve S&I also PI - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Electrified Circuits wrote: Arrays at a POS choose the material to use from a central storage container rather than an individual one for each array. No, it takes all the interesting bits out of starbase reactions. Also it would require rebal...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.16 22:24:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |