Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daelin Blackleaf
The Reclaimed
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:25:00 -
[31]
While I agree with the principle of having this kind of freedom in EVE two things about it bother me.
> These corps chose the smallest, some might say hardest pressed, militia to infiltrate and attack.
> They don't show up on your overview. Yes, you can keep yet another tab on my overview to switch to when attacked by "friendlies", but it's a highly inconvenient having them displayed all the time. I should imagine having them agress your frigate, nanowotsit, or med/long-range ship after sliding up below 10km makes you feel particularly... violated.
|
Novemb3r
Vale Heavy Industries Molotov Coalition
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:25:00 -
[32]
I think it's a pretty good representation of things. Oftimes in the real world (I know people will stop reading here) you get different factions of the same ideological group fighting amongst themselves.
I think it adds character. -
|
ollobrains2
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:34:00 -
[33]
slacker industries has war decd their own parents before nothing new there makes FW interesting
|
Leviathan9
Gallente Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:35:00 -
[34]
Slacker Industries and Royal Hiigaran Navy have declared war upon Series of Tubes. Further threats of other corps dec'ing us. ----------------------------
|
Sopha Serpentia
Core Dynamics
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:36:00 -
[35]
Edited by: Sopha Serpentia on 09/07/2008 01:39:12 Edited by: Sopha Serpentia on 09/07/2008 01:37:43
Originally by: Novemb3r I think it's a pretty good representation of things. Oftimes in the real world (I know people will stop reading here) you get different factions of the same ideological group fighting amongst themselves.
I think it adds character.
It adds character yes, but its also pretty disruptive. Id like to know if this was and intended game mechanic or was it something overlooked by CCP?
And another thing. Does the in-militia war dec bypass the standing loss as a result of kills in militia, therefor is it a legitimate griefing bypass?
|
Captain Hudson
Caldari Royal Hiigaran Navy
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 01:47:00 -
[36]
Edited by: Captain Hudson on 09/07/2008 01:48:53
Originally by: Daelin Blackleaf While I agree with the principle of having this kind of freedom in EVE two things about it bother me.
> These corps chose the smallest, some might say hardest pressed, militia to infiltrate and attack.
> They don't show up on your overview. Yes, you can keep yet another tab on my overview to switch to when attacked by "friendlies", but it's a highly inconvenient having them displayed all the time. I should imagine having them agress your frigate, nanowotsit, or med/long-range ship after sliding up below 10km makes you feel particularly... violated.
We are nothing to do with the minmatar or gall, we just dont see eye to eye with one side of the faction.
The Real Eve FanFest |
Terd Berggler
Love and Sausages
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 04:04:00 -
[37]
The sooner the primadonna drama queens are gone, the better. Slackers and RHN are doing the Amarr militia a favor.
|
Khanto Thor
Amarr Imperial Academy
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 11:03:00 -
[38]
I'm just pleased there's another thread about Factional Warfare.
We have a severe lack of FW threads this week!
|
Xorxarle
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 11:23:00 -
[39]
wouldn't it be wiser if someone decs another militia corp then all the other corps in that militia war dec them. it would soon stop the infighting as soon as people realise that decing another corp will stick them in a world of hurt.
|
Take Enemy
Amarr Armada.
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 16:16:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Take Enemy on 09/07/2008 16:18:20
Originally by: Terd Berggler The sooner the primadonna drama queens are gone, the better. Slackers and RHN are doing the Amarr militia a favor.
Please, whatever you think personally of Series of Tubes or Angel, at least he runs nightly ops with some measure of success. That's more then can be said for either Slackers or RHN. Other then the constant gay bashing s*** on TS/Militia chat --which I believe CCP had words about, it is pretty entertaining and quite a bit of fun.
Edit: didn't expect s*** to get through the filter...
|
|
Danton Marcellus
Nebula Rasa Holdings
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 16:41:00 -
[41]
Sounds like a great development. More fractions within the factions are most welcome.
Should/would/could have, HAVE you chav!
Also Known As |
Crumplecorn
Gallente Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 16:50:00 -
[42]
Originally by: Sopha Serpentia griefing
-
DesuSigs |
PaddyPaddy Nihildarnik
Gallente aurorae pacificas
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 16:54:00 -
[43]
Originally by: Xorxarle wouldn't it be wiser if someone decs another militia corp then all the other corps in that militia war dec them. it would soon stop the infighting as soon as people realise that decing another corp will stick them in a world of hurt.
Maybe externally- but in saying that nothing is stopping me from war deccing a 1 man corp to bypass all FW rules about high sec ganks- turning the militia into a "normal" alliance, negating the whole "step from pve to pvp" side of FW. Furthermore making it too hard (ie Faction navies attack Wartargets regardless of militia) would mean that the Militias would just become clotted with wardec shirkers. Operate in Gall high sec? sweet- join the Militia and have the NPC navy remove the threat for you.
Now internally we have an even bigger problem. On one hand- which side would be aggressable, the wardeccer or wardeccee or both? Now what about from the social aspect? There is no way to regulate militia membership (unlike norm alliances) and from what I can tell all the corps decced have been from established corps with a history, not from griefers. Also there are alot, ALOT of morons in the militias, gall and minnie included- there should be a way of kicking the ****ers and morons out- but it should be handled BY the militia- not by a ccp mechanic.
|
Nitalya
Amarr Das Reich.
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 17:43:00 -
[44]
Edited by: Nitalya on 09/07/2008 17:44:38 i think its a major flaw on ccp to not have a GM monitor the faction milita chats...this would help fix alot of the childish argueing that goes on here... since there is no real ceo of the milita ccp should step up so a few children dont ruin the fun for everyone.... i also find it funny that angle got a 3 day ban for useing bad language simply cause slackers filed more petitions if there was a gm in the milita chat they might of seen what a jerk RF the slackers ceo was being and all the foul lang he was useing. IMHO if your gona ban one you should ban the other
i would also like to add its pretty silly that ccp allows corp in the same milita to wardec eachothe... you would never see the us army wardec the us airforce.
|
Terd Berggler
Love and Sausages
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 18:31:00 -
[45]
Originally by: Take Enemy Edited by: Take Enemy on 09/07/2008 16:18:20
Originally by: Terd Berggler The sooner the primadonna drama queens are gone, the better. Slackers and RHN are doing the Amarr militia a favor.
Please, whatever you think personally of Series of Tubes or Angel, at least he runs nightly ops with some measure of success. That's more then can be said for either Slackers or RHN. Other then the constant gay bashing s*** on TS/Militia chat --which I believe CCP had words about, it is pretty entertaining and quite a bit of fun.
Edit: didn't expect s*** to get through the filter...
Nothing against Tubes or anyone else, and yeah Angel gets some fleets/blobs together, which is great. But the idiotic behavior far outweighs any positive contributions imo. Also, a lot of other corps are contributing (including Slackers) but they are skeptical about letting outsiders in, ie npc militia people. Common sense dictates there are more than a few spies.
|
Alvara
Kuiper Belt Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 18:47:00 -
[46]
Originally by: rValdez5987 So far its gone like this.
Slacker Industries war decced Series of Tubes 32nd Amarrian Imperial Navy Regiment war decced Slacker Industries. Royal Hiigarian Navy war decced Series of Tubes 32nd Amarrian Imperial Navy Regiment will war dec Royal Hiigarian Navy by 0300 eve time tonight.
There are at least 3 other corps that will be getting involved within 48 hours that I know of unless this somehow gets diplomatically defused.
Normally, not a big deal. But Angel is a main FC. Afaik he gets the most fleets out easily in a night, with the most action, and is also doing a bulk of enemy plex capping for our militia. Anything that disrupts this is a big deal imho.
Too bad Angel doesn't understand diplomacy and acts more like an attention deprived child then a mature fleet commander. It is a good thing Angel is leaving it'll let more FC's get expereince and hopefully a more cohesive militia.
If Tubes got war decced it is their own fault for pushing so many to the limit. I've known many corps were reaching their limits with Angel and company. Calling everyone traitors who won't get in his fleets. Seeing spies everywhere and calling people spies saying he has proof when there is none. Angel caused his own falling.
Tired of Waiting to do research? Use Empire Research |
Righteous Fury
Slacker Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 19:32:00 -
[47]
Originally by: Terd Berggler Nothing against Tubes or anyone else, and yeah Angel gets some fleets/blobs together, which is great. But the idiotic behavior far outweighs any positive contributions imo. Also, a lot of other corps are contributing (including Slackers) but they are skeptical about letting outsiders in, ie npc militia people. Common sense dictates there are more than a few spies.
Any commander worth his salt expects to have spies in gangs when he's running with people he hasn't been flying with for a long time. Its not a reason at all to exclude people, but its also not a reason to be obsessively paranoid and accuse everyone of being spies when a skirmish doesn't go your way. Personally from an FCing standpoint in FW, I have zero issue with letting people I don't know into my gangs - its just difficult when you've been blocked by half the militia at the request of someone who doesn't like you
As far as Amarr goes, the situation is not nearly as bad as some of the more vocal people (including myself) might have led others to believe. Obviously I have no intent to cause another CAOD flamewar, but RHNVY and SL never attempted to drag the entire militia into our problems with Tubes. Angel has been the one consistently spouting vitriol and lies because he wasn't receiving the popular support he thought he deserved - to the point where he cursed out the admins of the Amarr Milita forums when they told him to sort it out himself. Don't get me wrong though, I've been doing more than my fair share of antagonizing in Militia Chat as well, but now that Angel has ragequit and promised to go to the Caldari or Minmatar Militias, things should be getting back to normal soon.
|
Harisdrop
Gallente Fat J Souls of Vengeance
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 19:43:00 -
[48]
Originally by: Nitalya Edited by: Nitalya on 09/07/2008 17:44:38 i think its a major flaw on ccp to not have a GM monitor the faction milita chats...this would help fix alot of the childish argueing that goes on here... since there is no real ceo of the milita ccp should step up so a few children dont ruin the fun for everyone.... i also find it funny that angle got a 3 day ban for useing bad language simply cause slackers filed more petitions if there was a gm in the milita chat they might of seen what a jerk RF the slackers ceo was being and all the foul lang he was useing. IMHO if your gona ban one you should ban the other
i would also like to add its pretty silly that ccp allows corp in the same milita to wardec eachothe... you would never see the us army wardec the us airforce.
Based on the knowledge I have of alot of corps and Alliances. I think war decs within militia is great. How many times have blue shot blue, corp thieves and general dislike how others play the game.
I would think by allowing the militia to act like a true milita instead of an alliance the aspect of play actually is more based on the orignal concept Eve is based on.
I feel that players and corps standings should hold more impact in the militia. By playing the FW aspect the militia should be more controled.
One thing people forget is that in chat there is a way to block.
|
Nachshon
Caldari 17th Minmatar Tactical Wing
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 22:17:00 -
[49]
This is hilarious. They're turning on each other all the while the Minmatar continue to raid plexes and capture systems.
Where are PIE and the other RPers? Shouldn't you try to lead the way to unify the 24th and get your act together? ____________________________________ Caldari by birth, Minmatar by citizenship.
The True Meaning of Freedom
My v |
Thorliaron
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 22:18:00 -
[50]
Caldari/Minmatar wont be laughing when angels crew roll into ur militia chat!
|
|
rValdez5987
Amarr 32nd Amarrian Imperial Navy Regiment
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 23:28:00 -
[51]
The situation is now changed. It is a tossup as to what happens now.
I love Eve.
|
Doc Extropy
Gallente Kinda'Shujaa
|
Posted - 2008.07.09 23:36:00 -
[52]
I'm not surprised. What was the reason? Debates about some obscure scripture? Or if a space cathedral must face or not face the sun?
Or maybe if the Eve Gates second flashlight is a greenish blue or a blueish green?
<3 <3 <3 ---
Skill queue now! Nerf skillpoint loss and half done skills! WE ARE PAYING CUSTOMERS AND DESERVE MAXIMUM COMFORT! |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |