|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Malken
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.16 08:02:00 -
[1]
good luck and may the power of the blue squirrell be with you
|
Malken
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.18 14:47:00 -
[2]
stop being fricking muppets FFS. we like RZR and IRON and we always have even though we are shooting now. the only ones ive started to dislike personally is morsus mihi with their demanding this and demanding that attitude.
time will tell what will happen and in the mean time ppl will have fun looking at nice sploshuns.
|
Malken
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 08:27:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Fred0 Edited by: Fred0 on 19/04/2008 06:46:08 Edited by: Fred0 on 19/04/2008 06:45:37
Originally by: Gallager
Originally by: Fred0
Lol fredo, Although I do belive Insurg wanted to remove RzR pos's and take Branch, Pulling out to strike wasnt the reason for failing against bob :)
You're probably right. But we're stubborn enough to not have left unless this INSRG thing had happened. We pulled back 2 weeks earlier aswell for 5 days when ATF convo'd and asked for our Branch moons. At that time we just went home, kept INSRG blue, and shot ATF some to show them we meant business about not giving up our moons.
RZR are honestly not an agressive entity but we will defend ourselves with full force and use our allies to win wars if we have to. We play fair and we respect most alliances in EVE...
You make the impossible possible, Fred0. I didn't think there was anymore RZR-poo to go around and then I read this.
On the RZR leadership boards long ago there were posts regarding the relationships between RZR and these alliances (ATF and INSRG). It was stated in these posts that you would let the hostilities in Branch go on as long as no RZR assets were attacked. You knew then that there was going to be a fight between RZR and both of those alliances, but you wanted to do it on your terms as your interests in the south were of more importance at the time. You knew if you waited long enough, both of these alliances would give you a reason to justify a blob attack on them. I don't blame you for any of that as I think that is valid reasoning and a pretty damn good plan. The problem I do have is that you come on CAOD and act completely innocent as if you never would have considered aggressing these "friendly" alliances.
Remove the pipe and take deep, deep breaths. The stuff you are smoking has seriously degenerated the little bit of brains you used to have.
Umm, what? Your post and mine go perfectly together mate. Saying we'll fight back if they come after us is not being agressive in the sense I said it. Convo'ing and requesting us take down towers is. I'd never do the first against any of our friends but if RAWR/MH or whoever started asking us to comply to completely one sided demands we would fight them. Ofcourse they never would but anyway you see my point I hope.
EDIT: Dunno how to repair this post
calling and asking the buddy to remove their rusty old dodge off your lawn isnt ok then?
|
Malken
Celestial Apocalypse Insurgency
|
Posted - 2008.04.19 10:06:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Fred0
Originally by: Malken
calling and asking the buddy to remove their rusty old dodge off your lawn isnt ok then?
Bad analogy. It's not a rusty old dodge, it's a moneymaker and the only reason you want us to remove it is so that you can earn dough there instead of us. One sided deal where you gain something and we nothing. Shows us what kind of friends you are.
so its ok for you to keep that rusty old dodge on his lawn since you make money from it?, dont you have your own lawn to **** on so to speak?
kinda shows us what kind of friends you were to use your own analogy.
|
|
|
|