|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1973
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 03:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:We'll start off with some of his comments made on the EVE Online forums, specifically where I ask him a few questions. Quote:Q: Would you push for a special designation (e.g. training corporation) for EVE University, to exempt them from a war declaration system?
A: Believe it or not, if CCP offered me some kind of 'special designation' tomorrow, I would very likely say no. The answer seems fine on the surface. It is curious he didn't outright say "No," but qualified his answer with a "very likely". I wonder what offer might be made that would change a "very likely no" into a "yes."
ahahahahahaha
wow, I have some straws for you to grasp at ahahahahahah yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1997
|
Posted - 2012.02.08 22:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
None ofthe Above wrote:The Mittani wrote:*obsesses on anonymity* *is a npc corp alt* Actually, the desire to speak out without the need to disclose a link to in game character who is vulnerable to harassment and intimidation vs the desire to have ones elected representatives clarify their positions (particularly if they are running for reelection) is not so much of an oxymoron as you would make it out to be. Seems perfectly rational to me.
i am a ~fairly well-known~ eve-o poster (i.e. troll) and the most that has happened is a callout in local
oh no im scared, back to using forum alts like it's 2005 yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2029
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:20:00 -
[3] - Quote
Juicy Chanlin wrote:testobjekt wrote:Kelduum make the api key public for full disclosure! ROFL..You crazy? Make every other candidate's corp do the same then.
About that.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlIIq5agK7rWdDRnaWwzMVRrYTFCTG1sZEJhTWN1Z1E yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2029
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Don't know what that is - other than a page Google says no - one can enter without sending a request for permissions... If it's supposed to be some sort of rebuttal, make it open to the public.
Used to be public so vOv yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2029
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 18:06:00 -
[5] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Andski wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Don't know what that is - other than a page Google says no - one can enter without sending a request for permissions... If it's supposed to be some sort of rebuttal, make it open to the public. Used to be public so vOv What was it?
GSF's ~public~ balance sheet, heh. yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2034
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 20:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
CSM delegates do not act as amateur game designers. Several past and present delegates have emphasized that point. yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2148
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 22:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kelduum Revaan wrote:9. The ability for a director/CEO to remove a member without the 24 hour cooldown due to roles.
Why? This would be a pretty big nerf to infiltration ganking. yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2148
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 23:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
Kelduum Revaan wrote:the 24 hour cooldown is there to stop someone emptying hangars then running away instantly - if a director/CEO is okay with it, there's no reason someone shouldn't be allowed to leave immediately.
Keep in mind that it also stops somebody from instantly dropping corp during a wardec. yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|