Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Krissada
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 08:16:00 -
[481] - Quote
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Andski wrote:so, tell me, why do you believe you are entitled to run incursions? uh.... really? still? OK, how about $15 US a month is why.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHH!!!
Best
tears
ever |
Endeavour Starfleet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
601
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 09:40:00 -
[482] - Quote
Krissada wrote:TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Andski wrote:so, tell me, why do you believe you are entitled to run incursions? uh.... really? still? OK, how about $15 US a month is why. HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAH!!!! HAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHH!!! Best tears ever
Would be great tears to be had if I could hear them over your laughter.
Then again it appears to be normal in your group after watching the fail editing of that fake logi video. Don't enjoy the tears enjoy hearing the sound of your own voice instead. |
Sin Istersly
Pinnacle Services Coalition The-Nation
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 09:51:00 -
[483] - Quote
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:As often as you need it...
Lysaeus wrote:Sin Istersly wrote:I havnt seen people so transparent and atypically refusing change since I raised my children past the age of 6. Let me guess, Mommy and Daddy didnt beat your @$$ when you had it coming? So you beat your kids?
Only as often as needed and no more. All things in moderation, and lets face it, if your honest with yourself, as a child, I dont think a single one of us as people can deny that at some point in our upbringing, we we're snotty, stuck up, bratty, and spoiled to the point that nothing would get thru to us but a swift smack on the ass. I know I was at time and I'm grateful for the spankings I received when they were deserved. It kept me from turning into some of the crybabies you've seen propogating this thread. I'm not saying I liked it, I'm not saying anything sexual, and I'm not saying everyone should beat their kids. I'm saying I'm glad my parents disciplined me appropriately.
For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5jxvEs3hYk
Perhaps if she'd been spanked on occasion she wouldnt be whining about getting a new car in the wrong color.
My dad 'gave' me a car when I turned 18.
His 88 ford crown victoria.
Gave me a deal too, $1000 bucks for it and he helped me fix the transmission. Twice. I was grateful.
Even let me use his tools, and the rest of the gas in the tank, such kindness. I'm sure he would have backhanded me for complaining about it being a red ford, but you know what, that old POS was held together by rust and bubblegum, got 7 miles to the gallon, no AC, no radio, and it drove like a up armored tank. But I loved that car. Wish I didnt have to sell it when I deployed. Hell, if I ever get the money, I'm gonna try to buy it back. I miss that old road tank. Here's some real tears for you crybears. |
Sin Istersly
Pinnacle Services Coalition The-Nation
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 09:53:00 -
[484] - Quote
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Hey Sin.... my son is my CEO!!! LOL.. and he's the middle kid... Active duty Marine (and a real sandbox vet) stationed in SC several states away from home... and I get to spend time with him here every night...
Man I love this game... =]
Semper Fi brother. Two time vet of the sandbox here, currently civie in college and loving it. Might go back, might not, I dont miss the brass, but I do miss my brothers in arms.
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Andski wrote:the irony of a risk-averse hisec incursion runner calling anyone a "bear" does not escape me
fyi all the tears seem to be coming from the incursion bears ;p Ahhhh.... ok, lets do this slow again... 1. I am not an Incursion runner. Have Never done even one. 2. I am not by any means risk-averse... I live in an effin wormhole... if you think that's risk-averse, then you have other, worse delusions you should seek treatment for... 3. I love PvP... my record is not the best, 50/50, and I aint real good at it... but I can hold my own and I love a GF... what one man calls tears... is another's justified disdain... meh. Went over all of this before...
Same here, I'm not risk averse, I'm risk wise. I dont have the skills to handle myself against a PVP trained pilot in nullsec. You think it's ironic that I'm laughing at nullsec bears tears when I'm a highsec bear? I think it'd be pretty F^^King stupid to take my weakly PVP skilled butt out into the shooting gallery to be honest, where I stand next to no chance against a frigate with a skilled pilot in it in even the most powerful Battle cruiser with T2 myself. Why would it be wise for me to take 150 mil in equipment into the middle of nullsec to get popped exactly? that's the one thing I cant figure out.
Again, risk wise. The potential gain does not outweigh the immediate risk. Derp. |
Cannibal Kane
Count With Teddy Mercenaries
201
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 10:04:00 -
[485] - Quote
At first this sounded like a good Idea so I decided to keep an eye out for what will happen.
I see the word Tear farming used to much for just to many different situations, and all I see is both sides Crying.
The OP is crying about people making to much isk in incursions. Incursion runners crying about sites going down fast.
It really very exciting from the sidelines, please continue. "Demoralize the Enemy from within by Surprise, Terror, Sabotage, Assassination. This method of Guarilla Warfare is the only Method of Warfare for me"
|
Sin Istersly
Pinnacle Services Coalition The-Nation
18
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 10:06:00 -
[486] - Quote
Actually, most of the incursion runners seem to be crying about the nullsec crybabies crying about them not playing the mechanics as intended.
"Damn you fools for ingenuity and exploitation! We pirates are the ones who exploit stuff!" seems to be the general theme in my opinion. I find it amusing. |
Cannibal Kane
Count With Teddy Mercenaries
201
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 10:09:00 -
[487] - Quote
Sin Istersly wrote: Actually, most of the incursion runners seem to be crying about the nullsec crybabies crying about them not playing the mechanics as intended.
"Damn you fools for ingenuity and exploitation! We pirates are the ones who exploit stuff!" seems to be the general theme in my opinion. I find it amusing.
True...
Although I consider Tear farming as somebody begging you not to pop his ship or such thing, only do it and watch him rage. Now thats Tear farming, this is just... lame from both sides. "Demoralize the Enemy from within by Surprise, Terror, Sabotage, Assassination. This method of Guarilla Warfare is the only Method of Warfare for me"
|
Sin Istersly
Pinnacle Services Coalition The-Nation
19
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 10:54:00 -
[488] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Sin Istersly wrote: Actually, most of the incursion runners seem to be crying about the nullsec crybabies crying about them not playing the mechanics as intended.
"Damn you fools for ingenuity and exploitation! We pirates are the ones who exploit stuff!" seems to be the general theme in my opinion. I find it amusing. True... Although I consider Tear farming as somebody begging you not to pop his ship or such thing, only do it and watch him rage. Now thats Tear farming, this is just... lame from both sides.
Eh, I suppose I cant argue. In my defense though, I dont look into the forums much, and I even more rarely post. I'm not quite sure what compelled me to get involved in this particular thread. Perhaps it was just something entertaining to do while my mining lasers did their jobs. |
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus BricK sQuAD.
517
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 11:14:00 -
[489] - Quote
Sin Istersly wrote:
Why would it be wise for me to take 150 mil in equipment into the middle of nullsec to get popped exactly? Derp.
No one suggests you need to take "150 mil in equipment" nor go to "the middle of nullsec" to "get popped". Derp indeed.
How stupid is CCP? So stupid it took them SEVEN YEARS to make a "loot all' Button. |
Krissada
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
71
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 11:28:00 -
[490] - Quote
Sin Istersly wrote:TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:As often as you need it... Lysaeus wrote:Sin Istersly wrote:I havnt seen people so transparent and atypically refusing change since I raised my children past the age of 6. Let me guess, Mommy and Daddy didnt beat your @$$ when you had it coming? So you beat your kids? Only as often as needed and no more.
I don't know mate. This is just a game and you are outright saying you are guilty of what would be considered a crime in my country. Well try and keep the discussion children safe alright? We wouldn't want you to beat them up. |
|
Khanh'rhh
One Man Rodgering
637
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 12:06:00 -
[491] - Quote
Sin Istersly wrote:Again, risk wise. The potential gain does not outweigh the immediate risk. Derp. So you agree the reward doesn't meet the increased risk.
Part of that is because you can make 120mil in highsec, each hour, 24/7
Perhaps. Just perhaps, if that kind of income was only possible in 0.0 your argument would be very different. - "Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual, issued in the 1930's |
Tallian Saotome
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
336
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 12:25:00 -
[492] - Quote
Krissada wrote:Sin Istersly wrote:TurAmarth ElRandir wrote: So you beat your kids?
Only as often as needed and no more. I don't know mate. This is just a game and you are outright saying you are guilty of what would be considered a crime in my country. Well try and keep the discussion children safe alright? We wouldn't want you to beat them up. So, when your son lights the house of fire being an idiot, you will not spank him?
I take it you prefer emotional abuse as a punishment for children. Thats terrible. o/`-á Lord, I want to be a gynecologist.. KY, rubber gloves, and a flashlight.-á o/` |
Tyralyn
Stardust Academy
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 12:42:00 -
[493] - Quote
Khanh'rhh wrote:Sin Istersly wrote:Again, risk wise. The potential gain does not outweigh the immediate risk. Derp. So you agree the reward doesn't meet the increased risk. Part of that is because you can make 120mil in highsec, each hour, 24/7 Perhaps. Just perhaps, if that kind of income was only possible in 0.0 your argument would be very different.
I think the payout should be changed the main problem is we dont remove isk from the game with pi ccp removed the last isk destruction from the game and the isk getting more and more. The incrusions speeded up the trend I think one possibility is to change the payout in incurisons low money for example 2 mill per sight but much more lp the next step is create a new concord lp shops with things they are needed in 0.0 for example tower blueprints (bpc) and remove the orginal blueprints (this is only a example) so we keep the money inflow A other ide is reduce the the money to 5 m per run and add tags to the lp shop :-) for a high lp price so you can spend youre lps in a usefuel way to get first the tags in lp shop and than some factionmoduls by a other lp shop
|
TurAmarth ElRandir
Hiigaran Bounty Hunters Inc. Astraeaus
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 14:14:00 -
[494] - Quote
Krissada wrote:TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Krissada wrote:
So you beat your kids?
Only as often as needed and no more. I don't know mate. This is just a game and you are outright saying you are guilty of what would be considered a crime in my country. Well try and keep the discussion children safe alright? We wouldn't want you to beat them up.
Darius III wrote:
No one suggests you need to take "150 mil in equipment" nor go to "the middle of nullsec" to "get popped". Derp indeed.
UhGǪ excuse me Darius, butGǪ Krissada #1 GÇô GÇ£We have to put a gag to this ISK faucet and shake up those bears. If they wanna do incursions they can go to lowsec or nullsecGÇ¥
So yeaGǪ the OP of this inane post is saying exactly that... and trying to force others to go to lo / nullGǪ check yer facts man.
And SinGǪ I do believe I found why Krissada believes s/he can tell others what to do and how they can play "he/r" MMOGGǪ. She was never GÇÿtaughtGÇÖ how to get along with others and that there are consequences for he/r in appropriate actionsGǪ
Thank GOD I still live in a country that understands spare the rod, spoil the brat.
And Sin,... semper fi bro. o7
TurAmarth ElRandir HBHI VP & Salvage Operations Director Fly Safe and see you in the Sky =/|)= http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/ |
TurAmarth ElRandir
Hiigaran Bounty Hunters Inc. Astraeaus
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 14:35:00 -
[495] - Quote
Tyralyn wrote: I think the payout should be changed the main problem is we dont remove isk from the game with pi ccp removed the last isk destruction from the game and the isk getting more and more. The incrusions speeded up the trend I think one possibility is to change the payout in incurisons low money for example 2 mill per sight but much more lp the next step is create a new concord lp shops with things they are needed in 0.0 for example tower blueprints (bpc) and remove the orginal blueprints (this is only a example) so we keep the money inflow A other ide is reduce the the money to 5 m per run and add tags to the lp shop :-) for a high lp price so you can spend youre lps in a usefuel way to get first the tags in lp shop and than some factionmoduls by a other lp shop
OK, this is as close as anyone here has come to a reasoned and thought out arguement. I can alllmost go with this except for the base premise.
That it is somehow wrong for people to 'farm' Incursons making large amounts of ISK which they do not put into IRA's or college funds, but ply right back into the game, supporting the economy, buying ships and stuff AND as has been intimated all along, supporting the PvP habits of many a main (or alt)... I just dont see it.
Its a game, we spend time to make ISK. Moar ISK, moar ships in space, moar opportunities for PvP... Reduce peoples incomes, you directly reduce the number of people who can afford to PvP... You will not 'force' anyone into lo or null if they can turn to an alternate, though lesser, form of income generation... of which there are many.
The basic premise, that it is wrong and a breach of game mechanics to farm NPCs, something that has been done since NPCs first started flyin around in EVE... is sheer BS, no matter how much ISK is made.
You just dunt like it, and yer gonna do this to stir things up. If you'ld just say it and stand up for your griefing ways... I wouldn't have a word to post here. But you are trying to justify griefing... and you can't or your arguments wouldn't include the refernces to Tears... the one thing griefers all value so highly. TurAmarth ElRandir HBHI VP & Salvage Operations Director Fly Safe and see you in the Sky =/|)= http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/ |
Hoxothul
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 14:57:00 -
[496] - Quote
Tyralyn wrote: I think the payout should be changed the main problem is we dont remove isk from the game with pi ccp removed the last isk destruction from the game and the isk getting more and more. The incrusions speeded up the trend I think one possibility is to change the payout in incurisons low money for example 2 mill per sight but much more lp the next step is create a new concord lp shops with things they are needed in 0.0 for example tower blueprints (bpc) and remove the orginal blueprints (this is only a example) so we keep the money inflow A other ide is reduce the the money to 5 m per run and add tags to the lp shop :-) for a high lp price so you can spend youre lps in a usefuel way to get first the tags in lp shop and than some factionmoduls by a other lp shop
Wow, somebody actually got it right!
We do not want Incursions removed, we do not want to permanently stop high sec carebears from playing the game either.
What we want is that highsec incursions gets balanced, in regards to both Risk vs Reward and raw ISK injection to the game.
Reduce the amount of raw ISK that are being given per side and boost the LP somewhat to make up for it. Furthermore, whenever the Mothership do spawn, rest of the sites should stop spawning, forcing the community to actually kill the Mothership and end the incursion, as it was intended from the beginning. |
J Kunjeh
334
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:00:00 -
[497] - Quote
God the tears are so, so lovely in this thread. Seriously, such crybaby's abound in Eve. Kill moar mom's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |
Keith Planck
The Great and Powerful Corporation
53
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:25:00 -
[498] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:God the tears are so, so lovely in this thread. Seriously, such crybaby's abound in Eve. Kill moar mom's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://mlfw.info/f/1398/ |
TurAmarth ElRandir
Hiigaran Bounty Hunters Inc. Astraeaus
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:41:00 -
[499] - Quote
Tyralyn wrote: What we want is that highsec incursions gets balanced, in regards to both Risk vs Reward and raw ISK injection to the game.
...and end the incursion, as it was intended from the beginning.
Again, well argued and I can almost, almost... see it.... but nope.
As I see it, the risk v reward has been set by CCP. They made these the hardest Hisec NPCs in the game, and bumped the rewards, in thier view, accordingly. I am satisfied with what they have decided... you aren't.
"... and end the Incursion, as it was intended..." Says who? Did CCP wite up a blog saying we msut end it? That the Mom must be killed? If so why dont the mechanics already force that? It would be easy to do according to many here, but they did not set the mechanics that way... and they know ALL about NPC farmnot code for a ing, it has been going on for years now... so why did they not code for a forced end? Why did they allow NPC farming in Incursions...?
Mebbe to intiate this sort of player v player drama... one wonders. TurAmarth ElRandir HBHI VP & Salvage Operations Director Fly Safe and see you in the Sky =/|)= http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/ |
Hoxothul
Lead Farmers Kill It With Fire
9
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:46:00 -
[500] - Quote
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Tyralyn wrote: What we want is that highsec incursions gets balanced, in regards to both Risk vs Reward and raw ISK injection to the game.
...and end the incursion, as it was intended from the beginning.
Again, well argued and I can almost, almost... see it.... but nope. As I see it, the risk v reward has been set by CCP. They made these the hardest Hisec NPCs in the game, and bumped the rewards, in thier view, accordingly. I am satisfied with what they have decided... you aren't. "... and end the Incursion, as it was intended..." Says who? Did CCP wite up a blog saying we msut end it? That the Mom must be killed? If so why dont the mechanics already force that? It would be easy to do according to many here, but they did not set the mechanics that way... and they know ALL about NPC farmnot code for a ing, it has been going on for years now... so why did they not code for a forced end? Why did they allow NPC farming in Incursions...? Mebbe to intiate this sort of player v player drama... one wonders.
Concord pays to you defeat Sanshas raiding forces, to protect the citizens of high sec from slavery, no? How exactly are you defending them by keeping the Mothership alive as long as possible so that you can farm the vanguards? |
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1134
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:56:00 -
[501] - Quote
Sin Istersly wrote:TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:As often as you need it... Lysaeus wrote:Sin Istersly wrote:I havnt seen people so transparent and atypically refusing change since I raised my children past the age of 6. Let me guess, Mommy and Daddy didnt beat your @$$ when you had it coming? So you beat your kids? Only as often as needed and no more. All things in moderation, and lets face it, if your honest with yourself, as a child, I dont think a single one of us as people can deny that at some point in our upbringing, we we're snotty, stuck up, bratty, and spoiled to the point that nothing would get thru to us but a swift smack on the ass. I know I was at time and I'm grateful for the spankings I received when they were deserved. It kept me from turning into some of the crybabies you've seen propogating this thread. I'm not saying I liked it, I'm not saying anything sexual, and I'm not saying everyone should beat their kids. I'm saying I'm glad my parents disciplined me appropriately. For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5jxvEs3hYkPerhaps if she'd been spanked on occasion she wouldnt be whining about getting a new car in the wrong color. My dad 'gave' me a car when I turned 18. His 88 ford crown victoria. Gave me a deal too, $1000 bucks for it and he helped me fix the transmission. Twice. I was grateful. Even let me use his tools, and the rest of the gas in the tank, such kindness. I'm sure he would have backhanded me for complaining about it being a red ford, but you know what, that old POS was held together by rust and bubblegum, got 7 miles to the gallon, no AC, no radio, and it drove like a up armored tank. But I loved that car. Wish I didnt have to sell it when I deployed. Hell, if I ever get the money, I'm gonna try to buy it back. I miss that old road tank. Here's some real tears for you crybears.
There's a lot to what you are writing.
Starting around the early 1990s, there was a movement in parenting that was all about letting your kids know how special and wonderful and smart they are, in spite of any evidence to the contrary.
We are now seeing the "fruits" of that labor, in game and out. A lot of people are so thinking they are so great at everything and living in a little bubble of their own perception when in fact, they suck as people and suck at what they do. I have to deal with these zombies every day. These are the people who tell you their name and expect you to jump for joy.
And these are the people with a dangerous sense of entitlement. I hope those that play this game learn to shed it before some RL situation comes up where their overblown sense of self could get them killed.
|
J Kunjeh
335
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 15:58:00 -
[502] - Quote
Please take your parenting discussions to the OOP forum, this thread is about tears. Thank you. "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |
March rabbit
Ganse Shadow of xXDEATHXx
114
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 16:03:00 -
[503] - Quote
J Kunjeh wrote:Please take your parenting discussions to the OOP forum, this thread is about tears. Thank you. do you mean tears is that white things on your face?
interesting..... |
J Kunjeh
335
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 16:13:00 -
[504] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:J Kunjeh wrote:Please take your parenting discussions to the OOP forum, this thread is about tears. Thank you. do you mean tears is that white things on your face? interesting.....
Those aren't tears...I just had a facial. "The world as we know it came about through an anomaly (anomou)" (The Gospel of Philip, 1-5)-á |
GhostDragoon
Incertae Sedis Cascade Imminent
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 16:54:00 -
[505] - Quote
Krissada wrote:Before words ---- Yes, it's this thread again. No, it's not just empty words. This was posted many days ago, but I decided to take it down to have some chats with a few selected people before finalizing everything. _____________________ We have come to the conclusion that even though blackbird suicide ganking is a profitable and very fun activity it only limits the Incursion Bear activities by some degree. If we are to end their reign once and for all which has lasted for almost a year it is time we do it now. We would like to announce the creation of a wonderful and most generous channel named: "Grief the Bears" with the sole purpose of taking down all motherships in highsec as soon as they appear and end the incursion just like CCP intended.... We shall put an end to this inhuman farming and abuse of game mechanics. We have to put a gag to this ISK faucet and shake up those bears. If they wanna do incursions they can go to lowsec or nullsec. What do we require and why do we need you?
- 30-40 bodies to effectively fight off the site and finish it.
- Armor buffer fit battleships and a handful subbattleships.
- T2 logistic ships.
- Empty tear jars.
So join us at the channel ----> Grief the Bears and let us finally put an end to all this. Once all the highsec incursions are down they will not respawn for another 24+ hours. When that one will spawn it will only take the bears 4-5 hours to make the mothership appear and then we shall sweep in yet again and finish it. Can you imagine highsec where the bears only get to incursion 15-20 hours for a whole week? I can and it is filled with tears.... PS: Beware that extracting a sufficient amount of tears will result in merc wardecs hired by rich bears. I see this as a side bonus! _______________ Above is the simple plan. We cannot keep on waiting and whining to CCP. We are taking matters into our own hands with or without you. If you want to join, feel free to. If you rather not that is fine too. But if you want to whine and complain because we are stopping the ISK faucet then make sure you are crying into one of our jars. Fly much reckless
Why does every one of these posts sound like another group of butthurt carebears.
OH! BooHoo people make more money than me in hisec.. GET OVER IT. go learn to kill things properly, with fire & napalm and even tactical nukes. I find your lack of awesome appalling and your "Down with their reign" RP wannabe persona lacking. You sound more like a carebear than the actual carebears. I'm all for griefing and killing things with fire but you lot really make us look bad....
It's like the entire US/EU/NATO coalition going after Niger and patting each other on the back for winning...
Soft target much? |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
1134
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 17:15:00 -
[506] - Quote
Look, I just want to pop Sansha motherships and do it while fleeted with an interesting crowd. The mothership is a perfectly legitimate PVE war target.
I also have an interest in seeing if this kind of "raiding tactic" against a single target in a threat-heavy environment has any viability and what kind of methods and ship fittings evolve around this.
With proposed changes in cap mechanics and possible changes in SOV and potential for future conflict, there is a lot that can be learned from this endeavor.
If kiddies who feel entitled to a target they they do not have exclusive access to want to cry about it, it's not my problem. I say the same for null dwellers who cry when I sneak into their systems way past their gank walls.
This is also an opportunity for anybody eschewed from incursions for lack of shineys to put a T1 BS together and rock the boat, have a good time, learn to operate in a fleet, and hit the big red plus. What's wrong with that?
Let's all be motherf**kers. |
Zag'mar Jurkar
QC Steel Industries
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 17:20:00 -
[507] - Quote
I don't see why incursion runners complain about them being disrupted... All I know and can see is Darius and others playing the Sandbox as intended, and so does the other side as well... |
TurAmarth ElRandir
Hiigaran Bounty Hunters Inc. Astraeaus
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 17:57:00 -
[508] - Quote
Hoxothul wrote:Concord pays to you defeat Sansha's raiding forces, to protect the citizens of high sec from slavery, no? How exactly are you defending them by keeping the Mothership alive as long as possible so that you can farm the vanguards?
(Responding in Character)
Yes, my friend... We do avoid killing the mothership... this is a strategic battleplan. In the year since Sansha began these "Incursions" into the Empires we have found Sansha's forces act in a very, very predictable manner... their programming allows for very little leeway in their strategy and tactics... and we are taking full advantage of this.
By delaying the destruction of the mothership, we lure more and more of his forces out into battle and destroy them. Sansha does not have unlimited resources available to him any more than the Matari, the Gallente or even the Amarr do.
This is a war, not just a battle. We are in this to TAKE Sansha Kuvakei DOWN! We are in a war of attritionGǪ we cannot at this time afford to invade SanshaGÇÖs home spaceGǪ so we must hurt them as much and as badly as possibleGǪ we draw the line HERE! And NO FURTHER!!!
We will draw them out and draw them out and kill them for as long as it takes! We extend the battle because we can afford the few losses his forces inflict while destroying hundreds of his shipsGǪ and yes, thousands of his slaves. But they are lost already are then not? Death is, for them, a release from slaveryGǪ
It is a hard, hard thing to doGǪ but Sansha Kuvakei leaves us no choice. As we cannot take the fight to him, we must hurt him as much as we can when the opportunity presents itself.
TurAmarth ElRandir HBHI VP & Salvage Operations Director Fly Safe and see you in the Sky =/|)= http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/ |
Simi Kusoni
The Synergy Cascade Imminent
57
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 18:01:00 -
[509] - Quote
TurAmarth ElRandir wrote:Hoxothul wrote:Concord pays to you defeat Sansha's raiding forces, to protect the citizens of high sec from slavery, no? How exactly are you defending them by keeping the Mothership alive as long as possible so that you can farm the vanguards? (Responding in Character) Yes, my friend... We do avoid killing the mothership... this is a strategic battleplan. In the year since Sansha began these "Incursions" into the Empires we have found Sansha's forces act in a very, very predictable manner... their programming allows for very little leeway in their strategy and tactics... and we are taking full advantage of this. By delaying the destruction of the mothership, we lure more and more of his forces out into battle and destroy them. Sansha does not have unlimited resources available to him any more than the Matari, the Gallente or even the Amarr do. This is a war, not just a battle. We are in this to TAKE Sansha Kuvakei DOWN! We are in a war of attritionGǪ we cannot at this time afford to invade SanshaGÇÖs home spaceGǪ so we must hurt them as much and as badly as possibleGǪ we draw the line HERE! And NO FURTHER!!! We will draw them out and draw them out and kill them for as long as it takes! We extend the battle because we can afford the few losses his forces inflict while destroying hundreds of his shipsGǪ and yes, thousands of his slaves. But they are lost already are then not? Death is, for them, a release from slaveryGǪ It is a hard, hard thing to doGǪ but Sansha Kuvakei leaves us no choice. As we cannot take the fight to him, we must hurt him as much as we can when the opportunity presents itself. :notsureifserious:
|
TurAmarth ElRandir
Hiigaran Bounty Hunters Inc. Astraeaus
10
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 18:06:00 -
[510] - Quote
GhostDragoon wrote: OH! BooHoo people make more money than me in hisec.. GET OVER IT. go learn to kill things properly, with fire & napalm and even tactical nukes. I find your lack of awesome appalling and your "Down with their reign" RP wannabe persona lacking. You sound more like a carebear than the actual carebears. I'm all for griefing and killing things with fire but you lot really make us look bad....
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Look, I just want to pop Sansha motherships and do it while fleeted with an interesting crowd. The mothership is a perfectly legitimate PVE war target.
GǪIf kiddies who feel entitled to a target they they do not have exclusive access to want to cry about it, it's not my problem.
Zag'mar Jurkar wrote:I don't see why incursion runners complain about them being disrupted... All I know and can see is Darius and others playing the Sandbox as intended, and so does the other side as well...
+1 +1 +1
Kudos to you allGǪ
TurAmarth ElRandir HBHI VP & Salvage Operations Director Fly Safe and see you in the Sky =/|)= http://turamarths-evelife.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 .. 28 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |