|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Wollari
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
78
|
Posted - 2015.07.14 00:14:33 -
[1] - Quote
There's a problem with the structures CREST API. Stations that are currently in a freeport mode event, are omitted in the structures listing. I understand that they're not counting towards to sovereignty and therefore are omitted.
But this confuses devs and maybe users that are looking into the structures and wondering where the station currently is. The main problem is tracking. When a structure is missing in the API, usually it's destroyed (IHUB/TCU) but this doesn't apply to the station. It's just has no owner.
Can't you just included the all the conquerable stations and just removed the owner (alliance) from the dataset like you removed the vulnerable* attributes in other cases?
DOTLAN EveMaps-á| Your out-of-game map, navigation toolset, sov database, etc. since 2008
|
Wollari
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
78
|
Posted - 2015.07.14 19:55:58 -
[2] - Quote
Thanks for pointing out where to look at ... didn't know that such a list exists.
Not counting to sovereignty is one thing ... but when open up the showInfo window of a system in "freeport" mode, you'll see that the station is still listed in the "sovereignty" tab including it's reinforcement timer .... according to your statement CCP should remove it there as well ... cause it's not a sov structure anymore ...
DOTLAN EveMaps-á| Your out-of-game map, navigation toolset, sov database, etc. since 2008
|
Wollari
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
78
|
Posted - 2015.07.14 22:06:43 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:vulnerableEndTime: The time at which the next or current vulnerability window ends. At the end of a vulnerability window the next window is recalculated and locked in along with the vulnerabilityOccupancyLevel. If the structure is not in 100% entosis control of the defender, it will go in to 'overtime' and stay vulnerable for as long as that situation persists. Only once the defenders have 100% entosis control and has the vulnerableEndTime passed does the vulnerability interval expire and a new one is calculated.
You don't go into overtime. Just tested on TQ. At the end of the vuln-window the tcu was at 50% control, but it did not went into overtime. Gameplay != Dev Blog Description
DOTLAN EveMaps-á| Your out-of-game map, navigation toolset, sov database, etc. since 2008
|
Wollari
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
79
|
Posted - 2015.07.17 12:11:02 -
[4] - Quote
CCP FoxFour wrote:We are still unable to reproduce this and have tested it on TQ and it did work as expected. Can you let us know when and where this happened and if it happens again. We tested it. We started before the end of the window of a vulnerable structure. After we run over the endtime, the cycle sucessfully finished it's work, but we were unable to continue. The structure was already invulnerable.
I think we completed at least one successfull entosis cycle (after the warmup) and were in our 2nd cycle. I don't know how the structure calculates it's next vul-timer if somebody is entosis it.
--
next topic: The sovereignty structures api doesn't provide the corporationID of the structure owning corp.
The Sovereignty XML API still contains the corporationID. If I want to replace the sov-xml-api fully with the crest result, I'm loosing the corporation information.
DOTLAN EveMaps-á| Your out-of-game map, navigation toolset, sov database, etc. since 2008
|
|
|
|