|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 23 post(s) |
ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1687
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why... why is the Ishtar packing over 200 less PG than the Vexor navy issue...? Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1688
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 19:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tyberius Franklin wrote:Boss McNab wrote:ElQuirko wrote:Why... why is the Ishtar packing over 200 less PG than the Vexor navy issue...? Because CCP RISE and CCP FOZZIE thats why This would be witty if it wasn't based on a statement that was off by a factor of 10.
Yeah, my bad, I looked at Pyfa and not the real numbers. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1690
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:28:00 -
[3] - Quote
Maximus Andendare wrote:Diesel47 wrote:HAC special bonus.
Ability to fit Micro Jump Drives and fitting requirement decreases.
Imagine that.. Honestly, this is the best idea. It gives advantages to both sniping and brawling gameplay, sets HACs apart from all the other similarly-performing ships (T1 ACs, ABCs, BCs, T3s, Pirate ships, CSs, etc.). *Only* a HAC could MJD from that list. That in and of itself would be reason to spend the ~100m more over a similarly-situated Navy Cruiser. Plus, it'd allow new metas to develop and be tested. Dual prop fits on HACs would have an entirely new meaning.
Bad Bobby wrote: I would prefer something like reducing the range of warp disruptors used against HACs by 50%. It's a buff to the preferred engagement envelope without breaking the ship. I just want to know if such a bonus is technically viable, because if they can't viably code it for relase then there is no point asking for it.
It hasn't been made clear why no move has been made towards giving HACs a real specialisation. I'm assuming that rather than lack of imagination it's lack of resources that has lead us here, because I'm sure that those involved could easily manage something better than "let's make them more resiliant".
Both these ideas are incredible. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1690
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hannott Thanos wrote:Both these ideas are incredible. I'm sorry but they are not. A ship that can close 100km in a little over 30 seconds are not supposed to be able to do it instantly as well. Broken as hell.
Reduction of range on point used on them? What? I wont even begin to explain how broken that is.[/quote]
If you can't begin to explain then evidently you have no argument. Reducing the range of shortpoints on ships designed for kiting spaces them out from the standard cruisers we have now; why do we need to spend 10x the ship cost just to gild the hulls that serve perfectly already? As for the MJD issue, that was more for the gimmick than anything, but I can see useful applications which can be countered by, for example, a warp scrambler. That oh-so-rarely fitted module. Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
ElQuirko
Jester Syndicate S0UTHERN C0MF0RT
1690
|
Posted - 2013.07.30 21:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
Devon Weeks wrote:I still haven't heard a justification for the massive decrease in armor and hull on the Deimos.
My feeling is it's something to do with the new railguns. The train of thought must be: more damaging railguns = more appeal for fitting them, whilst the extra med on the deimos means that will be filled with a tracking computer. Thus, every deimos is now forced to be a kiter deimos. As we all well know, kiters don't tank. Therefore, T2 specialization for CCP now means "THIS IS HOW YOU WILL FIT YOUR SHIP". Save the Domi model! Spacewhales should be preserved. |
|
|
|