Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Iam Widdershins
Project Nemesis Moar Tears
37
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 11:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
After some previous threads regarding the current state of possible imbalance in the field of Ewar drones, we have put some further thought into the ECCM and ECM dilemma and we have reached the verdict that they are played out and nobody likes them anymore. Having put considerable effort into investigating the nature of the concerns that have been most frequently raised, we have noticed some interesting trends, namely: lots of people think ECM sucks balls.
ECM is a frustrating mechanic, and while it has an important role to play, in a game of calculated outcomes and careful planning a module that relieson chance seems out of place. We believe we have jointly invented a much better solution that will fill approximately the same role, and satisfy the desires of current ECM pilots to remain relevant in modern combat.
Solution: Erectile enhancers / deflaters (EE / ED)
What they do: By increasing your own, or by reducing your opponents erectile potential you can greatly increase your own effectiveness and potency in a fight or, by contrast, negatively affect that of your opponent, comprehensively impacting the outcome of the fight and acting as a very literal GÇÿforce multiplier.GÇÖ
Names for Enhancers: T1: Erectile Turgidity Enhancer I Meta 1: Alumel Wired Todger Protraction Array I Meta 2: Incremental Ratcheting Codpiece Expander I Meta 3: V7-Y GÇÿBagpipeGÇÖ Girth Dilator I Meta 4: GÇÿCentrifugeGÇÖ Member Escalation Field I T2: Erectile Turgidity Enhancer II
[ Possible icon ]
Names for Deflaters: T1: Boner Flaccidity Projector I Meta 1: Dwindling Dongle Reduction Field I Meta 2: Ramrod Deflation Broadcaster I Meta 3: U-15 GÇÿCroissantGÇÖ I Torpedo Declension Meta 4: Phased Muon Morning De-glorifier I T2: Boner Flaccidity Projector II Storyline: 'Goatse' Johnson Debilitator I
[ Possible icon ]
Names for Projected Assist Modules: T1: Assistive Rigidity Solidifier I Meta 1: Linear Distension Assistance I Meta 2: GÇÿTelekinesisGÇÖ Billowing Proliferator I Meta 3: Sweeping Intensification Adjuster I Meta 4: GÇÿInceptionGÇÖ Reinforcement Injection I T2: Assistive Rigidity Solidifier II
[ Possible icon ]
In conclusion, we hope the marvelous developers and game balance engineers at CCP read this and put some real consideration into our carefully crafted proposal. We strongly believe that this will obviously foster a much more enveloping and immersive environment. Plus there are boners, lol.
this draft proposal was assembled in like an hour and a half by chrismyazz and iam widdershins. see what you can do when you put your mind to it? |
Chrismyazz
Ironclad Forge
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 11:19:00 -
[2] - Quote
I fully endorse this product and/or service. |
Charlie Crocodile
Sorfus Morfus
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 11:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Secondary effect - Module receives 2,000% bonus when used in conjunction with blue pill booster... |
Chrismyazz
Ironclad Forge
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 12:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Charlie Crocodile wrote:Secondary effect - Module receives 2,000% bonus when used in conjunction with blue pill booster...
This man knows what he is talking about. |
Musophil
Harm Co.
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 12:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
(This is a joke thread, right?) |
Charlie Crocodile
Sorfus Morfus
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 14:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
Joke? No jokes allowed.
internet spaceships = seriuz bizness. |
Mad Hops
Clearly Compensating The Dark Triad
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 14:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
You can find the full discussion here: http://forum.battleclinic.com/index.php/topic,152286.0/ECM-drone-strength-discrepancy-please-actually-read-this.html
|
Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
44
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 15:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
I would be the first to support an ECM overhaul. Especially a consideration to introduce stacking penalties of several ECM modules on a single target GÇô rendering it practically combat ineffective.
BUT I dont even understand what you are proposing.
Quote:By increasing your own, or by reducing your opponents erectile potential you can greatly increase your own effectiveness and potency in a fight or, by contrast, negatively affect that of your opponent, comprehensively impacting the outcome of the fight and acting as a very literal GÇÿforce multiplier.GÇÖ
Tracking disruptors and tracking enhancers, sensor damps and sensor boosters etc all fall under this description. This idea is vague at best.
"umm, i want a model that makes u fight worse, mmkay?" |
Chrismyazz
Ironclad Forge
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 15:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
I would have thought that was a given...? |
Charlie Crocodile
Sorfus Morfus
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 15:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cpt Fina wrote:I would be the first to support an ECM overhaul. Especially a consideration to introduce stacking penalties of several ECM modules on a single target GÇô rendering it practically combat ineffective. BUT I dont even understand what you are proposing. Quote:By increasing your own, or by reducing your opponents erectile potential you can greatly increase your own effectiveness and potency in a fight or, by contrast, negatively affect that of your opponent, comprehensively impacting the outcome of the fight and acting as a very literal GÇÿforce multiplier.GÇÖ Tracking disruptors and tracking enhancers, sensor damps and sensor boosters etc all fall under this description. This idea is vague at best. "umm, i want a model that makes u fight worse, mmkay?" Edit: my point. Spend less time of coming up with nifty names for the different meta modules and spend more time explaining what they do to begin with.
Oh dear. Can I suggest you reread OP slowly with tongue firmly lodged in cheek and then internet lol appropriately? |
|
Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
48
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 19:39:00 -
[11] - Quote
oops, my bad. Had to google the word.
Now I'm mad for have being trolled |
Feligast
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
256
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 21:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
My only concern is the potential to run these modules for longer than 4 hours. Would that then start to cause heat damage to the module? |
Ambrale
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2011.10.18 22:06:00 -
[13] - Quote
Am I the only one who expected the remote assistance module's icon to be a hand? lol |
Chrismyazz
Ironclad Forge
1
|
Posted - 2011.10.19 05:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ambrale wrote:Am I the only one who expected the remote assistance module's icon to be a hand? lol
You are hereby invited to the development team of this project. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |