Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
666
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 20:01:00 -
[91] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote: Notice the lack of catchphrases such as "system wipes" and "conflict drivers". Oh man, those are still cracking me up.
Then what would you call it? I think system wipe is a pretty apt descriplion for destroying all structures in a susyem...
Gnaw LF wrote: ... and I will always assist in defense of those who have lend a helping hand in defense of Banana.
Sounds link you would are being driven towards conflict in that example... now what should we can that i wonder? Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
Chitsa Jason
Infinity Explorers Exhale.
477
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 20:47:00 -
[92] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote:Indo Nira wrote:Gnaw LF wrote:
I mean for crying out loud, its the same old usual suspects that have been doing these invasions and evictions, alliance names might change and corps get shifted but you have been at it for a couple of years and its not like anyone has the numbers or the interest in stopping you. Just quit this spin machine, man up and say "Yeah, we beat them down and we will do something like this again". FFS.
isn't it the same people posting bulllshit and starting butthurt threads about what other people did for the past couple of weeks? :D like you. man up and say: I don't like the way you play the game and i'm butthurt that you don't play the game the same way i do. Nah, I am simply calling it like it is. Notice the lack of catchphrases such as "system wipes" and "conflict drivers". Oh man, those are still cracking me up. As for manning up and saying something, here goes: I will never invade any entity, unless they come from null, and I will always assist in defense of those who have lend a helping hand in defense of Banana.
Does that mean you will help my corp in case of invasion as I was helping banana defence in my carrier and my legion? Chitsa Jason for CSM 8 Twitter:-á@ChitsaJason Skype: Casparas
|
Rengas
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:00:00 -
[93] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:Gnaw LF wrote:Indo Nira wrote:Gnaw LF wrote:
I mean for crying out loud, its the same old usual suspects that have been doing these invasions and evictions, alliance names might change and corps get shifted but you have been at it for a couple of years and its not like anyone has the numbers or the interest in stopping you. Just quit this spin machine, man up and say "Yeah, we beat them down and we will do something like this again". FFS.
isn't it the same people posting bulllshit and starting butthurt threads about what other people did for the past couple of weeks? :D like you. man up and say: I don't like the way you play the game and i'm butthurt that you don't play the game the same way i do. Nah, I am simply calling it like it is. Notice the lack of catchphrases such as "system wipes" and "conflict drivers". Oh man, those are still cracking me up. As for manning up and saying something, here goes: I will never invade any entity, unless they come from null, and I will always assist in defense of those who have lend a helping hand in defense of Banana. Does that mean you will help my corp in case of invasion as I was helping banana defence in my carrier and my legion? Yes. |
Incindir Mauser
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
160
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:20:00 -
[94] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote:Nah, I am simply calling it like it is. Notice the lack of catchphrases such as "system wipes" and "conflict drivers". Oh man, those are still cracking me up.
As for manning up and saying something, here goes: I will never invade any entity, unless they come from null, and I will always assist in defense of those who have lend a helping hand in defense of Banana.
Long live The Banana Hammock!
Banana Hammock. First among W-space Bananas. Attractor of W-space Gorillas. May your stuffs remain un-messed with. May your POCOs remain organized.
|
HerrBert
Future Corps Sleeper Social Club
23
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:25:00 -
[95] - Quote
QT McWhiskers wrote: Then there is bob. What does he think about our form ups. Is he angry that we form up to fight a stronger enemy thus diluting our victory? Does he then smile as the other side team up to slay the mighty beast? Or is he simply happy that the blood of the WHer is spilt? Does he choke on the blood easily poured from an open wound? Or does he simply drink it all up and savor in the taste? SSC might be able to answer this one the best. Father Herrbert I look to you for guidance in these matters. (Sorry bert, couldnt resist)
Fellow Holemonkeys and Galacticbrainiacs.
The Bob is not pleased nor is he displeased, with the actions that happened regarding the TL Siege. He is pleased to see this lively discussion about the development of his kingdom. He feels the love through personal sacrifices. And keep in mind where there is ashes there will be fertile ground. The fact of the matter is sometimes it requires scorched earth to unite people. Sometimes it requires peace to start war.
The way of Bob is pathed with Trolls, Guns and Wrecks. So saying a Siege is unfair or numbers are unbalanced is a matter of perspective. He gave us guidelines, one may interpretate to not evict PvP. But it is also a great sacrifice and remember Bob fortunes those who sacrifice the most if they get up again and dust of their shoulders.
But asking for which side Bob would take seems like asking for a Holy War. Bob doesn't take sides. He who is so devious, takes loot and Kill mails. Some may say the sacrifice in Loveshack was a good one, some say it was too much and now we have to make an even bigger one. But most of you are doomed to see the real picture. Bob loves all the sacrifices.
If it's the Venture you caught harvesting C540 or the Battleship that tried to crash a hole, the JF that wanted to exploit a good direct Known space connection or the Carrier triaging to help his friends beat the sleeper. They all mean the same to him. His love is not measured by Isk destroyed. It's the effort of pilots, the sweat of teamwork and the countless screams of Scanners throughout his Systems.
praised be bob
|
Gnaw LF
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
383
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:30:00 -
[96] - Quote
Chitsa Jason wrote:
Does that mean you will help my corp in case of invasion as I was helping banana defence in my carrier and my legion?
Begrudgingly, but yeah, I will. |
Gnaw LF
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
383
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:31:00 -
[97] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Then what would you call it? I think system wipe is a pretty apt description for wiping out all structures in a system... Sounds like you are being driven towards conflict in that example... now what should we can that i wonder?
I would call the first one eviction, the second I would call paying your debts. |
Oxandrolone
Bite Me inc Bitten.
169
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:43:00 -
[98] - Quote
c6's have been wrecked by the circle jerking everyone is frends stuff. maybe its human nature but its still anoying.
|
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
667
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:44:00 -
[99] - Quote
Call it what you want Gnaw LF but either way you are wrong.
Anyway, back on topic...
Nobody likes blobs but like it or not, they are a fact of life in eve.
Thread end Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
Torshawna
Cold Moon Destruction Transmission Lost
8
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 21:56:00 -
[100] - Quote
HerrBert wrote:QT McWhiskers wrote: Then there is bob. What does he think about our form ups. Is he angry that we form up to fight a stronger enemy thus diluting our victory? Does he then smile as the other side team up to slay the mighty beast? Or is he simply happy that the blood of the WHer is spilt? Does he choke on the blood easily poured from an open wound? Or does he simply drink it all up and savor in the taste? SSC might be able to answer this one the best. Father Herrbert I look to you for guidance in these matters. (Sorry bert, couldnt resist)
Fellow Holemonkeys and Galacticbrainiacs. The Bob is not pleased nor is he displeased, with the actions that happened regarding the TL Siege. He is pleased to see this lively discussion about the development of his kingdom. He feels the love through personal sacrifices. And keep in mind where there is ashes there will be fertile ground. The fact of the matter is sometimes it requires scorched earth to unite people. Sometimes it requires peace to start war. The way of Bob is pathed with Trolls, Guns and Wrecks. So saying a Siege is unfair or numbers are unbalanced is a matter of perspective. He gave us guidelines, one may interpretate to not evict PvP. But it is also a great sacrifice and remember Bob fortunes those who sacrifice the most if they get up again and dust of their shoulders. But asking for which side Bob would take seems like asking for a Holy War. Bob doesn't take sides. He who is so devious, takes loot and Kill mails. Some may say the sacrifice in Loveshack was a good one, some say it was too much and now we have to make an even bigger one. But most of you are doomed to see the real picture. Bob loves all the sacrifices. If it's the Venture you caught harvesting C540 or the Battleship that tried to crash a hole, the JF that wanted to exploit a good direct Known space connection or the Carrier triaging to help his friends beat the sleeper. They all mean the same to him. His love is not measured by Isk destroyed. It's the effort of pilots, the sweat of teamwork and the countless screams of Scanners throughout his Systems. praised be bob
So spoke the prophet of bob and so it was. |
|
Incindir Mauser
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
166
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 22:27:00 -
[101] - Quote
HerrBert wrote:Fellow Holemonkeys and Galacticbrainiacs.
The Bob is not pleased nor is he displeased, with the actions that happened regarding the TL Siege. He is pleased to see this lively discussion about the development of his kingdom. He feels the love through personal sacrifices. And keep in mind where there is ashes there will be fertile ground. The fact of the matter is sometimes it requires scorched earth to unite people. Sometimes it requires peace to start war.
The way of Bob is pathed with Trolls, Guns and Wrecks. So saying a Siege is unfair or numbers are unbalanced is a matter of perspective. He gave us guidelines, one may interpretate to not evict PvP. But it is also a great sacrifice and remember Bob fortunes those who sacrifice the most if they get up again and dust of their shoulders.
But asking for which side Bob would take seems like asking for a Holy War. Bob doesn't take sides. He who is so devious, takes loot and Kill mails. Some may say the sacrifice in Loveshack was a good one, some say it was too much and now we have to make an even bigger one. But most of you are doomed to see the real picture. Bob loves all the sacrifices.
If it's the Venture you caught harvesting C540 or the Battleship that tried to crash a hole, the JF that wanted to exploit a good direct Known space connection or the Carrier triaging to help his friends beat the sleeper. They all mean the same to him. His love is not measured by Isk destroyed. It's the effort of pilots, the sweat of teamwork and the countless screams of Scanners throughout his Systems.
praised be bob
Wise words indeed Father Brother HerrBert.
Peace be upon His Melted Nanoribbons. |
Guile SONICBOOM
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
4
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 23:23:00 -
[102] - Quote
Its no secret that Bane is mad at TL. Bane got beat from the Transmission Lost Alliance because the majority voted against him according to the mittani.
And it seems to me that its a personal grudge of former Narwhals members(Hathrul, Max Leadfoot, and Chitsa) against the guys in LOST(Djswitch and co).
Anyone with a brain can clearly see it was never for "good fights" nor "evictions" its mostly a childish personal feud going on with these faggots.
Inb4 butthurt denials.
|
Gnaw LF
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
386
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 23:25:00 -
[103] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Call it what you want Gnaw LF but either way you are wrong.
Thread end
A fantastic, well articulated argument, bravo dear sir.... |
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
667
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 23:53:00 -
[104] - Quote
Thanks, i have every post you've made in this thread for inspiration.
How can you describing a non-eviction as an eviction not make you wrong? Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
Vincent Gaines
Cold Moon Destruction Transmission Lost
338
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 23:57:00 -
[105] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:
How can you describing a non-eviction as an eviction not make you wrong?
This sentence makes my brain hurt. Not a diplo.-á
The above post was edited for spelling. |
Tanaka Atsuko
Corporate Scum Test Friends Please Ignore
37
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 00:38:00 -
[106] - Quote
confirming this is a thread about Butthurt Bane ? |
QT McWhiskers
Hard Knocks Inc.
125
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:35:00 -
[107] - Quote
No this is an opinion thread on how people feel about the blue donut that has started to happen in w-space. |
Rengas
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
128
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 01:42:00 -
[108] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Thanks, i have every post you've made in this thread for inspiration. How can you describing a non-eviction as an eviction not make you wrong? Because the difference between a "system wipe" and an eviction is the difference between Minute Maid and Tropicana.
PS Forum warrioring is infinitely more gratifying than anything that in-game EVE has to offer.
|
Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1609
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 02:00:00 -
[109] - Quote
Lenier Chenal wrote:Jack Miton wrote:The current state of WH invasions/evictions is much like nullsec: both sides escalate until the one with more/luckier friends just wins on numbers. WH space used to be about small scale PVP with 25-30man fleets being about the peak for most groups. At those numbers tactics and skill still play a huge role where at 150+ man fleets where 10%+ of that is blap dreads, they really don't.
Personally I miss what WH fleets used to look like but i also know that It is extremely unlikely to ever change back. Move out of a c5/c6 then. /me facepalm
|
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:28:00 -
[110] - Quote
Wow this thread is way off topic...
I think everyone that started to inhabit a wh knew that there was risk involved...risk of eviction...invasion...risks of sleepers...spais...risks on conflict drivers and ultimately risks of total annihilation....
I think is kind of silly when you have folks spouting all these righteous vows that evicting anyone is wrong...and how wrong it is for Polarized. to evict TL. It looks like TL has moved past this...they are joking on these forums..but u seem to still be angry. Get over it man!
FACT: We invaded. FACT: We shot stuff FACT: TL still lives there and is back in business... FACT: Invasion fleet has left...taken down towers...and left QUESTION: Who did we "evict"
As far as it appears to me Vincent and DJ and TL have put this behind them...sure they will be cussing us for having to do more PVE for the next couple of weeks than they would want to... and maybe they are planning retaliation....this is part of the game...there is more than one way to play it...this is what they meant when they use the word "conflict drivers" I don't hate TL...this is a game ffs...to use a figure of speech..."we stirred the pot" it entertained us for the weekend...and we play this game for entertainment...don't take it so personal
Why don't we get back on topic...
Blobs bad small fights good...Bob has given his blessing...so say we all |
|
Gnaw LF
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
387
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:43:00 -
[111] - Quote
Guys, guys, guys... I just learned that if you kill some alliances towers but then LEAVE their system then its not an eviction. Just Spring Cleaning. They are more then welcome to move back into the system that may or may not have a ton of capital ships logged off in it. How gracious of you Castor, truly an example to live by, why I would say that Polarized. has truly opened my eyes. Your actions were not a violent eviction, it was nothing but a playful peck, a cheerful and gentle kiss between two long separated childhood friends.
This thread is too funny.
|
Castor Troyy
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
46
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:15:00 -
[112] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote:Guys, guys, guys... I just learned that if you kill some alliances towers but then LEAVE their system then its not an eviction. Just Spring Cleaning. They are more then welcome to move back into the system that may or may not have a ton of capital ships logged off in it. How gracious of you Castor, truly an example to live by, why I would say that Polarized. has truly opened my eyes. Your actions were not a violent eviction, it was nothing but a playful peck, a cheerful and gentle kiss between two long separated childhood friends. This thread is too funny.
Lol...if we had capitals in their system...we would be sieging it again...gotta keep those gentle kisses coming...I guess you really don't know what the word evict means...I literally spelled it out for u |
Gnaw LF
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
388
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:32:00 -
[113] - Quote
Castor Troyy wrote: Lol...if we had capitals in their system...we would be sieging it again...gotta keep those gentle kisses coming...I guess you really don't know what the word evict means...I literally spelled it out for u
Yeah, lets redefine all the terminology in EvE. I am going to make a small list for you, to get you a jump start:
Eviction - will now be known as "System Wipe". Drama and Political fallout - is now known as "Conflict Drivers". Prop Mod - a mod that literally gives props, such as "your Proteus is gorgeous this morning", to the user.
Insisting that TL will want that system and that your actions are somehow different from a full blown eviction is like handing your partner a used condom while insisting that they want to hold onto it.
|
Bane Nucleus
Anomalous Existence Existential Anxiety
409
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:36:00 -
[114] - Quote
To be super technical, we never did perform an eviction. They still had ships logged off in that wormhole, meaning they were still residing there...TAKE THAT GNAW Alliance CEO, Diplomat, Recruiter |
Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics K162
1611
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 05:51:00 -
[115] - Quote
Gnaw LF wrote:Prop Mod - a mod that literally gives props, such as "your Proteus is gorgeous this morning", to the user. I loled :P
|
CaptainFalcon07
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:30:00 -
[116] - Quote
When they're out for lunch.
The Falcon shall unleash the punch. |
Robert Fish
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
1
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:45:00 -
[117] - Quote
I remember my first eviction for Aquila, we rocked up in our RR BS's to claim a C5 > C3 wolf rayet, we didn't need no blue lists or mercs then. But soon after half the corp ****** off to a new hole cos they were too l33t for us with their fancy T3's and co-ops cloaks. /me not bitter |
Dorn Val
Probe Patrol Polarized.
121
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 06:59:00 -
[118] - Quote
Dorn Val opens the door and takes a step back, the smell of butt hurt and tears almost overwhelming him. He's tempted to just close the door and leave, but the temptation to point out the irony in the OP's post is just too much...
QT McWhiskers wrote: Before I start, I want to make it 100 percent clear. I am in no way speaking for Hard Knocks or any other corp or alliance that took part in the defense of TLost or my home system in December. I am here as a simple wormholer wanting the opinions of other WHers, or K-space dwellers, on the recent events in W-Space....
Translation: Superior numbers were successful in defending a system, so let's not talk about it...
QT McWhiskers wrote: As you all know there has been a lot of teaming up recently in W-space on one side of some dispute or the other...
Translation: Superior numbers were successfully used to attack a system and the defenders lost. Polarized and company should feel bad for "bringing the blob".
I think the time has long since passed to get over whatever it is you all are feeling and move on. No one was "evicted" -TL is free to set towers up in their system (and it's my understanding that they already have ). Still plenty of PVP in W space. Your static(s) still respawn every time they collapse, even though TL lost the fight... Sandbox: An enclosed area filled with sand for children engaged in open-ended, unstructured, imaginative play. Also a place for cats to urinate and defecate... |
Godfrey Silvarna
Frozen Dawn Inc Arctic Light
73
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 07:51:00 -
[119] - Quote
Wait what, are people here claiming that it is an eviction only if you set up a permanent 24/7 watch in the system? Now THAT is splitting hairs big time.
Invasion/evictions or whatever you want to call it, shooting the structures is the main event and the action that makes things happen regardless of how thoroughly you finish cleaning up the remainders. Splitting hairs over semantics is just pointless.
I get a feeling you guys might just be trolling Gnaw... naaah. I must be wrong. |
Rek Seven
DEEP-SPACE CO-OP LTD Polarized.
668
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 08:38:00 -
[120] - Quote
Personally, my argument is based in fact while Gnaws argument is based on opinion. Look up the word eviction in the dictionary if you do not understand what it means.
Gnaw is upset because he believes that kicking PVP corps out of wormhole space is bad. He is entitled to that opinion but the fact is, TL were not evicted, they simply lost assets. At the last count TL has already reestablished themselves in the same wormhole we attacked them in.
If we truly wanted to evict them i would again that our leader ship could have just turned TL system into a permanent temporary expo system until the last of caps came out of hiding.
... But of course someone is going to tel me that i'm wrong and we did evict TL from wormhole space and no conflict was created as a result of our actions. Is my bitter vet membership card in the mail? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |