Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
138
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 10:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
hi, Let me first introduce myself, Corebloodbrothers, Fc for Volt alliance & providence residents, proud provi Block member, and long time eve player with 3 accounts, for market stuff, scout, spy, titan, and so on. In real life I am Dutch, 41 years of age and proud dad of 4 daughters, I work as a IT manager in a callcentre with 50 agents, and in eve I am a god when the kids sleep nüè. Eve is my passion, I have 3900 kills atm, and still enjoy PVP big-time. I am a big fan of wormhole roams, new cruiser doctrines, and the paper/rock/scissors mechanisms that EVE present us. I do not agree EVE is broken, 500,000 players prove differently every day. Room for major improvement and enhancement of our game fun for sure yes, Eve should be evolving with us. A CSM candidate should bring that across, CSM should keep CCP at their toes, giving it all they got and make sure their activities match the players demand as a whole. CCP resources should be reflecting player activity or their activity wishes. If 10 % of eve loves mining, then that should receive a equal part. As a roamer and provi member personally I would love to see isk gathering based on local activity as most CSM candidates promote these days. Everyone wants action, change is good, if forces u to adapt and opens up new opportunities. Change pos moon mining into moon activity like in belts, I am sure CCP has ideas that way as they mentioned in old dev blogs. CSM should not want to try to implement their ideas and stand in CCP shoes, they should push forward the player wishes and demand that change, no matter what the actual outcome for their individual agendaGÇÖs will be. CSM should handle players interests, even control CCP in their integrity. Personally I think a player council is unique and also a way of promoting EVE, I think that is a secondary responsibility, while still being as demanding as critical as you can be. Remember that your worst adversaries can be your biggest promoters on a higher level. There used to be projects for little things, I did a survey last year when I ran for CSM first time as independent candidate and made a long list of people s small wishes and demands. I still miss a alliance fittings section on top of the corps, how easy would that make your life?, People mention cyno jamming ships, big implications, but he!, small scale roaming in null would pick up nüè controversial for sure, but lets not steer away from controversy. Some people say everything is broken in eve, u can also say people enjoy eve so much and they care too the level where they want to improve it all. I am a big advocate of a positive approach where u can demand the world. CSM does not work for CCP, it should work for its player base and reflect that, whether youGÇÖre a indy man, a wormholer, a pos owner, faction warefare, u name it. We share that goal with CCP and the employees who make their rl isk there to pay their morgages and kids. We all want the best for eve from different angles of interest, but we share that common ground. Some wanted to walk in station, other like the social part to pick up, others want to have browser access too the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent blobbing in ideas by big blocks, What you can expect from me it to represent you interest, be open, and be a player demanding the best out of CCP for us, making the gap between developer and player smaller, representing all the best, fun and craziest of the playerbase you all love when you logon. This is what I love to do for you with the same passion as I have enjoyed eve over the years and which make me login anytime.
dont hesitate too contact me ingame greetz core |
Speedkermit Damo
Callide Vulpis Curatores Veritatis Alliance
42
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 11:54:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hello Core,
Never trust a baldie, that's what my dad used to say.
Grow a nice thick head of curly hair on your toon, and you have my vote. Don't Panic.
|
Repsol CBR1000RR
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 12:17:00 -
[3] - Quote
You have my vote! |
madns
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 12:18:00 -
[4] - Quote
You have my vote 2 ! |
Montie Mole
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Got my vote! |
Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
41
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
corebloodbrothers wrote:I do not agree EVE is broken and 500,000 players prove differently every day. There is room for major improvement and enhancement of the game fun for sure, eve should be evolving with us.
Is it EVE, or eve? This is an important question.
You said something about dividing developer resources based on player preference. The majority of players live in high-sec, so it can be assumed they prefer the activities there. Does this mean you will advocate for development work focused on high sec? And if so, do you believe your predominantly pvp-oriented, out-of-highsec playstyle is suited for such advocacy? |
DraLaFi
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
+1 Regards DraLaFi https://www.eve-volt.net/kb?a=pilot_detail&plt_id=39040 |
Heinrich Hoss
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Knows a lot about plenty of game aspects as he has been there himself, and has a grasp of the meta game that is not easily matched. He's the people's man in Provi, and he usually prioritizes what is fun for everybody over himself. He puts a lot of time and effort into EVE. With his 3-6 fleets a week; when you go into provi with a subcap fleet there is a good chance he will have a fleet up, and if his fleet didn't take a wormhole you are almost guaranteed a fight. He is the biggest cogwheel in what keeps providence fun and attractive atm, and he is the kind of person who would give everything to try and make EVE fun for everybody; reds and blues alike. Would make an excellent CSM in my opinion. Good knowledge about both the game and its players, terrific leadership skills, activity, and knows how to have fun.
Has my vote. |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
123
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Another everything for everyone, no content candidate.
Quote:Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks. I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks". |
Tom O'Neil
Fruidian Logic The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:40:00 -
[10] - Quote
You have my Vote! |
|
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:corebloodbrothers wrote:I do not agree EVE is broken and 500,000 players prove differently every day. There is room for major improvement and enhancement of the game fun for sure, eve should be evolving with us. Is it EVE, or eve? This is an important question. You said something about dividing developer resources based on player preference. The majority of players live in high-sec, so it can be assumed they prefer the activities there. Does this mean you will advocate for development work focused on high sec? And if so, do you believe your predominantly pvp-oriented, out-of-highsec playstyle is suited for such advocacy?
Good question, i believe i can represent a part of null and show in general the sense that all shoudl be heard, whever the candidate plays dominately, my hope is highsec woudl push forward with a candidate as well ofc |
Darkness Reign
The Valiant Vanguard
3
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
You got my vote! |
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:42:00 -
[13] - Quote
Singular Snowflake wrote:Another everything for everyone, no content candidate. Quote:Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks. I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks".
No u look per item categorie, so u vote on high sec items, zero, faction, and wihtin each type u allocate resources |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
124
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:46:00 -
[14] - Quote
corebloodbrothers wrote:Singular Snowflake wrote:Another everything for everyone, no content candidate. Quote:Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks. I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks". No u look per item categorie, so u vote on high sec items, zero, faction, and wihtin each type u allocate resources Can you tell us more about this voting? As a CSM rep you are covered by NDA and cannot tell the voters about the future changes they should be voting for. You also get no say in how to allocate CCPs resources. |
William Husker Adama
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
10
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:47:00 -
[15] - Quote
+1 |
corebloodbrothers
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
146
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:51:00 -
[16] - Quote
Singular Snowflake wrote:corebloodbrothers wrote:Singular Snowflake wrote:Another everything for everyone, no content candidate. Quote:Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks. I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks". No u look per item categorie, so u vote on high sec items, zero, faction, and wihtin each type u allocate resources Can you tell us more about this voting? As a CSM rep you are covered by NDA and cannot tell the voters about the future changes they should be voting for. You also get no say in how to allocate CCPs resources.
Its more that there should be a balance and not the biggets bully gettung his. Way because he is. I know alot of industrial players who love their job, i dont see them getting love, whilst in. Every occupation u can have papercut projects. U can have 20 player mining sugestions and pick. The best, that, players do that, not csm, so thats not. A breach of any conduct code |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
124
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 13:59:00 -
[17] - Quote
corebloodbrothers wrote:Singular Snowflake wrote:corebloodbrothers wrote:Singular Snowflake wrote:Another everything for everyone, no content candidate. Quote:Some wanted to walk in station, others would like the social part to pick up, and some want to have browser access to the market. LetGÇÖs collect those wishes, split them in occupations and vote per section of eve interests to prevent the blobbing of ideas by big blocks. I think you'll find that "voting" is not the right avenue to reduce the power of "big blocks". No u look per item categorie, so u vote on high sec items, zero, faction, and wihtin each type u allocate resources Can you tell us more about this voting? As a CSM rep you are covered by NDA and cannot tell the voters about the future changes they should be voting for. You also get no say in how to allocate CCPs resources. Its more that there should be a balance and not the biggets bully gettung his. Way because he is. I know alot of industrial players who love their job, i dont see them getting love, whilst in. Every occupation u can have papercut projects. U can have 20 player mining sugestions and pick. The best, that, players do that, not csm, so thats not. A breach of any conduct code How is it balanced that 20 miners get the limited CCP resources focused on their wishes instead of the wishes of 20000 paying customers who happen to be in a bloc? |
Heinrich Hoss
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 14:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
Singular Snowflake wrote:How is it balanced that 20 miners get the limited CCP resources focused on their wishes instead of the wishes of 20000 paying customers who happen to be in a bloc?
corebloodbrothers wrote:If 10 % of eve loves mining, then that should receive a equal part.
Was that so hard now? :) It seems obvious to me what he means is that he wants the cake to be sliced up and distributed equally, not just be given in its entirety to the biggest group of people. |
Arrius Praetor
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:29:00 -
[19] - Quote
+1 vote from me !! |
Evesor Terra
Fink Operations The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 17:52:00 -
[20] - Quote
+1 Vote
Awesome guy here running!!!! |
|
Luth Curmal
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:00:00 -
[21] - Quote
corebloodbrothers will get my full support.
An exceptional FC reacting positively to the changes in EVE pvp; allowing more pilots to experience a greater game!
Always discussing ways to make the game more playable, to involve players more - To draw more players into activity and generate more fun for us all.
gl
|
Ol Sooty
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:08:00 -
[22] - Quote
Core sure gets my vote any day.
|
Hollowbody
Smoking Hillbillys The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:12:00 -
[23] - Quote
I'll definitely vote for Core, without hesitation. |
Serga Bravo
RC Industries Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:15:00 -
[24] - Quote
Core kills many reds... me like Core. \o/ |
connbo
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:15:00 -
[25] - Quote
You got my vote |
Manslaughter1
Fink Operations The Volition Cult
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:17:00 -
[26] - Quote
Count on my vote Core.. |
Hayden Oakenshield
Fink Operations The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:19:00 -
[27] - Quote
You're the man Core!! |
Julianne Duhann Erata
Volition Cult The Volition Cult
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:25:00 -
[28] - Quote
You have my support Core! |
Inari Shi
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:27:00 -
[29] - Quote
Core you got my vote!
Core bait, Best bait! :) |
Xavier Rollard
VC Academy
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.11 19:30:00 -
[30] - Quote
Good luck with the CSM candidacy, you got my vote! |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |