Turkatron
United Mining And Distribution
|
Posted - 2011.06.26 21:33:00 -
[1]
CCP, the bridge has already been burned.
Originally by: CCP Zulu I see it's clear we need to strengthen the deep mutual trust and respect that's been so unique and descriptive of our relationship.
Strengthen? I don't think so. There is no trust at this point at all. And there won't be again till you take tangible actions. Talk is cheap.
Originally by: CCP Zulu Therefore we have asked the CSM to join us in Iceland for an extraordinary meeting June 30th and July 1st to discuss the events of past week, to help us define and address the real underlying concerns, and to assist us in defining and iterating on our virtual goods strategy.
By all accounts CSM have already done this and you chose to disrespect them by releasing the first "dev blog" and not addressing our concerns. If I were on CSM I'd send a big ****you and not bother going to the meeting. It's clear you see CSM as a way to fool us into thinking you give a **** when you really don't.
Originally by: CCP Zulu The result of this meeting should be mutual agreement of how virtual goods and services will evolve in EVE.
At this point how can anyone trust CCP if they plan to "evolve" "virtual goods and services". Wait services also? Anyway, this is a subscription game, if it continues to extend past that there will be no trust because you, CCP, have already set the ball in motion.
Originally by: CCP Zulu However, just to prove the point of the Fearless newsletter and give you a further understanding of what it is then there are no and never have been plans to sell "gold ammo" for Aurum. In Fearless people are arguing a point, which doesn't even have to be their view, they are debating an issue. This is another example of how information out of context is no information at all.
Stop with this bull****. No one is buying it. The newsletter has very clear intent. Yes there is a section where employees debate the topic, however, the rest of the newsletter has a tone that says... this is not a debate, we are doing this, get used to it. In addition, all the rebuttals to outrage over this have had the same exact tone and very similar wording as the newsletter. You can't rationalize to the players in the same way as the newsletter rationalizes to the CCP employees why MT is a good thing if you expect us to believe that was nothing but a debate.
Let me quote your FEARLESS leader Hilmar.
Originally by: Hilmar I can tell you that this is one of the moments where we look at what our players do and less of what they say
I can tell you that this is one of the moments where we look at what CCP does and less of what they say.
Lastly, I think this sums things up nicely.
Original Size
|