Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Shintai
Gallente Arx Io Orbital Factories Arx Io
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:17:00 -
[4231]
Another ÇÇP Liar.
http://hosted.corelicorp.net/micro.jpg --------------------------------------
Abstraction and Transcendence: Nature, Shintai, and Geometry |
El'Niaga
Minmatar Republic Military School
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:17:00 -
[4232]
So if we are parleying, why aren't you participating?
Not one DEV post in this thread now in 11 hours....
|
Ghost Nightmare
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4233]
Where is this response theyve been talking about then?
|
MaiLina KaTar
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4234]
Edited by: MaiLina KaTar on 24/06/2011 15:21:59 Edited by: MaiLina KaTar on 24/06/2011 15:19:36 Hi Pann,
I thought you were gone for good back then, working for another company? Good to see an old face back again, though. Well... you know old in terms of... well you know what I mean
Anyways, to the point:
The basic sentiment from the player base is really quite simple and can be summed up in just a few sentences, instead of pagelong dribble:
1. "We told you so! Why the f* did you do it anyways?! You listening at all?!" Basically sums up Captains Quarters / its failed implementation. Not to drown in self-adulation here, but, I was amongst the first to come here and tell you in several posts that taking away the hangar view was a pretty bad idea for several very good reasons. I told you to put a "leave pod / enter station" button on the Neocom and keep the hangar view as is or even expand on it. Dozenz if not hundreds of other people agreed and / or told you the same thing. Huge threads on this topic, huge!
Why did you not listen? Why did you take away the one feature that would've made the transition to Incarna a breeze for everyone? What on earth were your game designesr thinking when they decided to remove the hangar view?
2. "NeX... are you f*ing out if your mind?!" I don't even think people would be anywhere near as upset as they're now if you hadn't released this thing with absolutely outrageous prices. Like seriously... what were you thinking? It's called microtransactions for a reason!
3. "It's half-assed FFS! AGAIN!" This is more of a fundamental problem with CCP, really, because you've been doing this since day 1. You make big announcements, lot of tamtam, and then don't deliver. Features you put in the game are lacking polish and you don't ever go back and actually fix the **** you put in. Big example once again -> sound! I mean seriously... will you ever fix all the broken and unfinished stuff in your game or are you going to continue putting in yet more unfinished stuff?
|
Jaroslav Unwanted
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4235]
Edited by: Jaroslav Unwanted on 24/06/2011 15:21:44 double post.
|
Captain Travaras
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4236]
Originally by: El'Niaga So if we are parleying, why aren't you participating?
Not one DEV post in this thread now in 11 hours....
my guess is they dont have anything to say that we will want to hear. They can say sorry all they like, but if it doesnt change their minds on where they want the game to go, then their apologies are empty.
Quote: Greed is good, didnt you get the memo?
|
titanium 4
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4237]
NO
:'(
don t do that
|
Taoi Khan
Empire of Collateral Damage
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:18:00 -
[4238]
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html#cq
That says it all.
Oh and this thread length.
|
Hel Xaphod
Gallente Center for Advanced Studies
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:19:00 -
[4239]
CCP seems to have forgotten why people play Eve. Choosing MT because "everyone else is doing it" ignores the very reason Eve is chosen by its players over "everyone else". They don't seem to know their own game. |
Ze DarkMaster
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:19:00 -
[4240]
Originally by: Oregin
Originally by: Terrante
Originally by: Orphan World
Quote:
Everyone must read
QFT
I'll throw my qft in there aswell.
|
|
Isis Soryu
Caldari Universitas Interimo Research
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:19:00 -
[4241]
Edited by: Isis Soryu on 24/06/2011 15:19:38 Edited by: Isis Soryu on 24/06/2011 15:19:21
Originally by: Ghost Nightmare Where is this response theyve been talking about then?
Their spinblog is coming
Quote: ArnarHrafn Arnar Hrafn Gylfason is writing words #eveonline #tweetfleet 58 minutes ago
Spinblog incoming
|
Olaf Rasmussen
Utopian Research I.E.L. Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:19:00 -
[4242]
Dont go all "Well MT is good, if its only vanity and its awwright"
AURUM and all assosiated bull**** needs to disappear. No compromises anymore.
|
Morgan Polaris
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4243]
Lies. Damn lies. Statistics.
Max today: 49,486 (eve-offline.net) Unique authors: 1665 (eve-search.com)
3.4% care
I'd have to pull some IR tricks to get an average account number, and I'm not feeling like scraping and coding for a day, but every poster having at least between 2 and 3 accounts is a reasonable safe bet (people like Vuk Lau evening out things a bit). So, I would say about 10% of CCP's revenue is at risk right now.
Donations accepted: 1BpQEYT7aSUNM863BV67FPxyv1cpxr74uu |
Kuronaga
Kantian Principle
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4244]
Originally by: Cailais "Massively has a hard-hitting interview in the works with CCP Zulu on the issue" - Massively
Yup you've got your priorities straight there. Communicate with press and then provide link to your customers.
Yup, yup good thinking.
C.
So that's the strategy they are taking for damage control?
Get the word out without actually communicating directly to your angry players?
For a less intelligent playerbase I would say it's a smart tactic.
In this community, it's simply going to add more wood to the bonfire.
Seelene was right, they are spending too much time and coordination plotting their counter-response and it's making them look dumb.
|
Adunh Slavy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4245]
Originally by: Cailais "Massively has a hard-hitting interview in the works with CCP Zulu on the issue" - Massively
Yup you've got your priorities straight there. Communicate with press and then provide link to your customers.
Yup, yup good thinking.
C.
CCP strikes it self with YetAnotherBoneHeadedPRMoveLOLCannon for 5000 damage
My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
Jaroslav Unwanted
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4246]
Originally by: Shintai Another ÇÇP Liar.
http://hosted.corelicorp.net/micro.jpg
Not necessarily .. You cant put blame on someone in past for things in future he didn't knew about at the time.
http://eve.beyondreality.se/NeXCQResponse.html#greed
Just instead of signature.
|
Zverofaust
Gallente Incompertus INC Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4247]
|
Haunting Widow
Wormhole Engineers
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4248]
Yeah this isn't exactly going to cool off.. I may not respond for a few hours since I'm late writing my end-term paper, but I will be watching and participating in this thread and many other players like me will keep this alive until CCP responds effectively... I should stress that, "EFFECTIVELY", to what they have said and plan on doing. It least we're no longer getting lame going-no-where responses from them.
We're not cooling down, We'll keep this up till you respond or our current subscriptions expire and you die to us (speaking for whoever the hell wants to back me up on that)
|
Macon Squaredealer
Squaredeal Enterprises
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:20:00 -
[4249]
Where the hell is the "NO, we will never even consider moving beyond VANITY AUR items" ??? How hard is that to say?
___________________________________________ Watch for the Squaredeal Enterprises IPO in the coming months. |
Mehrdad Kor-Azor
Amarr Iure Divino
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4250]
Originally by: Olaf Rasmussen Dont go all "Well MT is good, if its only vanity and its awwright"
AURUM and all assosiated bull**** needs to disappear. No compromises anymore.
So true. MT is a slippery slope, always has been.
|
|
Shintai
Gallente Arx Io Orbital Factories Arx Io
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4251]
Originally by: Templar Dane
--------------------------------------
Abstraction and Transcendence: Nature, Shintai, and Geometry |
Jimmy Juice Lips
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4252]
WHY ARE EVE PLAYERS BEING PENALISED DUE TO THE DEVELOPMENT WORLD OF DARKNESS AND DUST 514 ?
CCP FAIL.
|
Joseph Vacher
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4253]
Originally by: Macon Squaredealer Where the hell is the "NO, we will never even consider moving beyond VANITY AUR items" ??? How hard is that to say?
If they are considering it, extremely hard indeed.
|
Captain Travaras
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4254]
in my view, this seems to be alot more damaging for CCP then the Lulzsec attack (admittedly, not much they could do), and i thought people were annoyed when that happened
Quote: Greed is good, didnt you get the memo?
|
Jonny Foreigner
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:21:00 -
[4255]
Am loving the Hypocrisy of:
"I'm protesting in game advantage for money by cancelling my multiple account"
You do realise that multiple accounts is an in game advantage that you pay for?
|
Nemo deBlanc
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:22:00 -
[4256]
On an itouch currently, so I'll keep it short.
CCP, you have immensly dissapointed me. The leaked newsletter shows me a frightening view of your customers. We're not a bunch of golden geese. We're people who have all pu a lot of time and effort into this amazing game of yours. I've always spoken very highly of Eve and CCP to all of my friends. I think I'm up to 7 buddy invites now. You're making a fool of me with your greedy ass-hattery.
I'll be canceling this one and only sub of mine once I get home. I absolutely hate to leave this game I love, but I can't stand to be around while you make a ***** of her. I'll resub if I see a satisfying response to player concerns. But as far as I can tell? You've made up your minds.
And that's a damn shame.
|
Sonjaa VII
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:22:00 -
[4257]
Greetings & Salutations,
I accept the apology but cringe at your sidestepping the real issue.
Some of my much bigger concerns are:
* The lack of feedback on "Greed is Good" and the terrible ideas in there * Turning off the station spinning was pure bad/evil, you cannot explain that * I buy Plex with $$$, I dont find Incarna nor Incursions worth my money ( except for the Noctics ), I am dissapoint.
Let me be clear:
* I dont care that some machines explode or overheat, I trust you'll fix it * I dont care that there's bugs, I trust you'll fix those as well * I could not care less for the existing MT items or their price
Playing EVE costs me money, and I am not getting enough value. Fix it Soon.
T.
|
Traska Gannel
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:22:00 -
[4258]
Just to add to the threadnought ...
If CCP introduces items that can be purchased which affect in-game abilities or balance directly - including but not limited to ... special combat boosters, special ships, special modules, special implants, training time reductions, or direct purchase of currently available in game items (faction/deadspace/officier loot for example) ... I will join the mass exodus from the game (-2 accts).
(... and no if it comes to that you can't have my stuff ... :) ).
|
Azztoroid
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:22:00 -
[4259]
wonder how much of my monthly sub goes to the development to WOD and Dust, two games i dont have any interest in...
So not only do i have to live with a few bugs and other stuf, i also have to live with sponsoring other games for my money...
The werry bad part is that after sony`s "minor trouble" PS3 market are hit werry hard. So i might end up being the one throwing money into something that cant keep it self running...
Eevrything is just azzjuice right now.....
|
Technovar
Gallente Aliastra
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 15:22:00 -
[4260]
1. How much of CCP is owned by external investors or venture capitalists?
2. How much of this change has been directed by staff that is not primarily focused on game development, for example external financial oversight staff?
3. Is Joseph Gallo indeed setting the strategic direction of CCP, as claimed on his LinkedIn page?
4. Is Joseph Gallo CFO of CCP as part of an investment agreement, formal or informal? |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |