Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Jonathan Malcom
Gallente Test Alliance Please Ignore
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:45:00 -
[1471]
I'd like to chime in here for a second on the off-chance that this post actually gets read by anyone.
I love this game. I have for a while. I've gotten a lot of people I know to try it out. My fiancee once told me I was like an evangelist, but about Internet Spaceships instead of religion.
I'm seriously considering leaving, though. It makes me sad to say that. But given the contempt and disregard shown for the people who've made this game and your company what it is today is, quite frankly, staggering.
I hope that this course can change. I hope that Eve can stay the game for me. I don't expect that to happen, though. A few people in charge have decided that they know better than their players and will do what they think is best.
If that happens, this will not end well. It's not going to go how you expect it to. I'm afraid there are rough times ahead. And I'm sorry to say that I won't be part of them.
That's about as genuine as I'm capable of being. ___________________
|
b1zz
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:45:00 -
[1472]
Originally by: Ancyker Protip: Fixing old content is usually cheaper than adding new content and is a bulk of what older players really want.
Master-tip: There will always be something to fix - halting future expansions until the current game is perfect reduces the games progression to a snails pace. I have never played a game or used any software after release or update that wasn't broken in some way or another - facts of life.
|
Jade Constantine
Gallente Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:45:00 -
[1473]
4. The leaked CCP newsletter is deeply worrying because it does appear to break promises made by CCP to the CSM (and via them to the wider Eve community). It shows massive disrespect to our community and makes it painfully clear that Eve players are simply viewed as a cash cow to be relentlessly milked to fund other ventures.
The PR damage from this leak is immense in terms of broken trust and hurt feelings and it will take more than simple apologies to repair û I think the Eve community will need to see and be convinced that these terrible ideas will be abandoned so we can return to our subscription-based sandbox unthreatened by Gorden Gecko and his macro-transactional madness.
I believe you need to re-engage with Eve community via the CSM and devblogs, developer-chats etc and actively win us back at this point. I certainly need to hear that you are turning from the destructive path of greedy money-grubbing microtransactions for everything with one hand while you continue to take my subscription money with the other. I need to get my faith in CCP the company back.
5. Finally, the principle that microtransactions could be widened to include balance-breaking advantages for cash payments on top of the subscription is simply untenable in this environment. The impact of doing this will be many lost subscriptions to the perception you are double-charging people for content and breaking the critical integrity of the single server environment. You will spoil a gameworld that has been eight years in the making as the Noble Exchange has already begun to spoil our sensation of the sandbox as as the rushed incomplete terrible-looking CQ has damaged our collective suspension of disbelief.
If you must go down this route then Eve will eventually need to go free-to-play and you will have to exist entirely on microtransactions for everything. But I think we both know this is not going to fly. I strongly advise you to take the message back to the management that if you are short of cash simply look at upping the subscription fee rather than messing with the sandbox in this destructively short-sighted manner.
$70 dollar monocles or ôgold torpedoesö will not bring the crowds flooding into Incarna. People join games because they are original, accessible and fun. That is why World of Tanks works û not because the developers there are offering bling tank-decals for premium bucks!
CCP already have a unique IP in the worldÆs biggest single-server science-fiction simulation sandbox. Stop trying to copy the bloody fairy sparkle ponies in Wow! Put your minds back on Eve Online front and centre and finish the content we need finishing and stop trying to force-feed us with microtransaction-delivered immersion-breaking rubbish.
Monocle-gate has made CCP the laughing stock of the gaming industry.
Listening to the player base and stepping back from the brink will be the one thing you can actually do that deserves to be called ôfearless.ö
Join the Revolution!
|
Iamien
Democracy of Klingon Brothers
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:45:00 -
[1474]
Edited by: Iamien on 24/06/2011 03:46:37
Let us talk with John Turbefield (CCP Diagoras). He is the only CCP Employee that most of us have any respect for at the moment.
We do not want someone with media training.
|
Diomedes Calypso
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:45:00 -
[1475]
(don't know where it went when i hit post but I couldn't find it)
Basically, its clear from the words used and not used that they're not trying to make a bundle like a Steven Spielberg.. creating the best entertainment they can and pulling them in.
They're more like a local movie theatre trying to get all the kids to come to their theatre because the other kids are there and just getting decent enough films to meet the miniumum . Once they'r there he'll shake them down for all they got in their pockets for pocorn and soda adn "special" candy to look cool that they need to buy their girlfriends not to look like they're skimping.
Ok.. that is NOT FAIR to the many many creative pepole who love the game working there. But there is a real connection problem at the top ... we don't have a Steven Speilberg type running the studio.. its a Gordon Gecko
|
Eladaris
Amarr Excessum Industries
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:46:00 -
[1476]
Edited by: Eladaris on 24/06/2011 03:46:58
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
The fact that you have to lie to the player base because you're afraid of what we'd do... and then ask us to trust you... doesn't sound the slightest bit. Off?
//EDIT: Yes, I'm still reading back on page 20... sorry
|
Big Bad Guy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:47:00 -
[1477]
http://img718.imageshack.us/img718/6223/evehq.jpg
* Image turned to URL as it was too large for the forum layout - Fallout |
Tea Ester Elliot
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:47:00 -
[1478]
Originally by: neuroticdax now that is out of the way here is a newsflash for the people un-subbing because of the newsletter: its pointless and you srsly need to grow up as it stands ccp is a company and as such want to make money witch is understandable. but raging when some of them voice their opinion on the matter is just silly. however when arum was announced it was said with explicit emphasis 'none of the items will alter anything in game other than apperence' this is the only reason it was aggreed with so far as the NeX is concerned so long as it dosnt interfeer with game mechanics imo its fine.
also while +9 implants and buying faction standing sounds awesom and is far easyer than waiting or doing the hard work its a sure fire way to break the game almost irreprably
Stream of consiousness posting is bad, mkay?
Or are you just not mad that they're breaking the game?
|
Jonny Utrigas
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:47:00 -
[1479]
Someone let me know when the copy pasta is done and people start posting something meaningful since nothing of any use is going to happen until then. Actually, **** it, I'll just go to bed and wait for the devblog tomorrow. All real concerns have been stated, and CCP Manifest has already stated he will not answer the big yellow/rainbow text post because he can't/doesn't know/wtfever (he dodged giving a real answer). Anyway, good night angry mob, here's to tomorrow!
|
Slidepot
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:48:00 -
[1480]
While I agree with most if not all of the rage so far regarding real issues of eve moving forward.. I'd like to share my lower.. more base rage that this patch has caused... Me.. Now.. yes it's personal..(and I'm sure not just me)
I'm an avid reader of patch notes, etc. and all I have read to date about Incarna and PC needs to use has been SP3 compatable.. witness:
1. http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=882 Yes my PC passed this test.
2. http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=882 Date 9 days ago, "This allows us to accomodate users with old and gnarly hardware, a group weæve been proud to be able to serve in the past"
Ooops missed this one 3. http://support.eveonline.com/Pages/KB/Article.aspx?id=124 *Note that older graphics cards such as the Nvidia 6000 series may work but is not officially supported Date unknown but I didn't notice till yesterday.
I have not been able to log in and even see the the character selection screen much less the captains quarters. My PC falls right into point 2 above, older PC that should be able to play Eve, even if at low frame rates etc. And if mine can still there have been no helpful hints or any comment by CCP
Somewhere I saw an estimate that there were only 9,000 or so people who could not use SP3, and this new Incarna would not be able to support.. but I'm telling you that If I can't play as advertised in points 1 and 2 above that number is much higher.
I didn't ask for CQ you (ccp) forced it on me, I was playing eve fine till the patch.. sure I lagged now and then on my end and died horribly, but I can live with that.
I just recently invested in an alt, and sadly am subscribed for 4 months longer on both accounts (yea you stole $100 bucks from me) I had a year plus skill plan on my main, and limitless ideas for my new alt. Thanks for stealing those plans.
I didn't leave you Eve (CCP) You left me.
|
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion RONA Directorate
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:48:00 -
[1481]
Hey CCP Pann
I love you and have known you for years.
here is my summary -
1. High costs of aurum suck period. 80 dollars USD for a monocle is terrible.
2. You really need to address that internal letter pdf.
3. CQ is nice and i do love it, but we need an alternative than a picture of a bloody door. CQ for those who want it and ship spinning for those who dont.
4. There was also a thread that showed that the gallente pleasure hub is still in the ship spinning menus, and they loaded it into their game. PLEASE PLEASE bring that back (not really incarna but while we are on the topic of stations)
5. WILL you be more transparent. When the community rages and the gaming world rages, you need to be more transparent faster.
|
BeanBagKing
Terra Incognita Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:49:00 -
[1482]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
The reason why I am going through every post and not just skipping to the end unless someone tells me to, is so that I can make sure the nuances of the player responses are condensed, fully represented and then transmitted within CCP to the appropriate people. (Jade Constantine's post is one obvious verbatim one amongst)
I'm glad you are reading every one of them, personally I don't think this level of comments can be both condensed and fully represented. I'm sure there are some people at CCP who don't need the full version, who only need to know that players are upset about X because of Y. However, there are a lot of people involved in this who I think could use the full version, specifically those in charge of game design and the direction of the company. Those people should have to sit down and read these threadnaughts, not just this one, but at least one other I can think of (you know it).
Not only do I think they should have to, I think that if they are interested in this company, this game, and their players they should WANT TO. Yes, there is a lot of immaturity, general rage, pitchforks and torches. This should be taken into account as well, not necessary the hateful words themselves, but the level of raw emotion this has brought on. More importantly though there are the sane posters, I feel I'm one of them, I've posted about 8 walls-o-text now hoping that somewhere in there I correctly expressed the point I'm trying to get across, it's hard to do in text you know? Even if mine somehow get missed, there are nearly countless numbers of other people trying to do the same thing right now, too many to be properly condensed.
That probably won't happen though....
|
Adunh Slavy
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:49:00 -
[1483]
Originally by: Evelgrivion
I hope you are making it as clear as possible to those in power the unprecedented level of ****storm that will ensue if we get an answer that is any different than "We will never implement non-vanity MTs into EVE Online." No other answer is acceptable.
Can we trust that answer? MTs were never coming, here now. Fixes would be made - BFF working hard with a long way to go. Some core issues still languish from 2003. Optional CQ, FW, so on and so forth.
*shrugs*
My faith in CCP will return SoonÖ |
Asuri Kinnes
Caldari Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:49:00 -
[1484]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Khamal Jolstien
Address the internal newsletter, and enact a change in direction or else anything you have to say means nothing, and you'll keep losing subs.
That's the plan.
Prove it. Unsubbed an alt account already. Love the game, loosing faith in the company.
MAKE ME WANT TO PAY AGAIN! Wormholes: The *NEW* end game of Eve - Online.
No Local. No Lag. No Blues. No Blobs. |
Bomberlocks
Minmatar CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:50:00 -
[1485]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: AdmiralJohn Edited by: AdmiralJohn
Do you have any definitive idea of the future of Aurum?
Aurum is here to stay. The cycle here isn't changing soon.
The newsletter, man. Are you blind? What is going to happen EXACTLY with Aurum? Don't answer if you don't want to, because right now, it looks as if you are just trying to avoid the questions everyone wants answered.
Quote:
However, I feel like none of the concerns of the community have been addressed. Worse, I feel like these concerns are being swept under the rug, and even treated with outright contempt.
That was not on purpose and I sincerely apologize for that. We've asked you guys to digest a lot of very quick changes and did a suboptimal job at walking beside you during the past month. Dev blogs and test servers and AT interviews and such didn't quite cut it for everything. There is NO contempt against our players.I've witnessed some extreme amounts of exhibited patience for the nastiest of the nasties who have threatened lives, engaged in character assassination and such--and that's because we as developers realize there are a lot of hurt/angry people out there.
And why the ****ing hell do you think that is? You **** all over us, abuse our trust, try to **** our wallets for more than you already do, and you wonder why people get ****ed off? YOU started it!
Quote:
Features that many players want are ignored, while decisions that are questionable at best are made without regard to the concerns of the community. I won't make excuses for those features we know are much wanted or the ones people want us to go back and "fix". Heck, I want some of them. Soundwave and Eyjo and Dropbear and TonyG and Fallout want them too. BUT, making and designing and creating a game isn't pick and choose, especially when it comes to introducing something like Incarna or devoting significant dev time to rewriting old code backbone so we can grow again in the future. We know the other stuff is wanted. We know Incarna is also wanted and are working towards what many of you have wanted out of it. It just takes time.
But you make time to come up with bull**** like Incarna and new ways to steal our money?
Quote:
I don't think that it's too late to save this special little den of internet spaceships and internet spaceship captains; however, this trend cannot go on forever and it has all the signs of fail cascade written all over it. Word.
It might not be too late to save the game, but at the rate you're going it's not looking good.
Quote:
CCP, your players really do care about you and about your game. It would just be nice if the feelings were returned. I could profess my love for each of you and really really mean it. Yes even you back there! But we all know its going to be more about showing you and not just saying it.
I care about the game, or at least I did, but you've ****ed us over so hard recently - forumgate (where the **** is the devblog about that explaining how that got past a security audit?), shooting the messengers (Helicity and others), 99 dollars money grab then pretend to backpedal, No optional CQ, hardware meltdown, new bugs ****ing again, $80 dollar monocle, then the final straw Greed is Good and a royal slap in the face of your customers as you plan to rob them of even more money than you already do, and all this on top of years of balancing issues that lie dormant - that I at least don't honestly give a **** about you or your company.
To me it smells, looks and sounds like CCP is going bankrupt. Don't be surprised if and when that happens as you will have brought it upon yourselves. --------------------- Countdown to sub running out: 9 days. |
Scarlett Anstian
Minmatar DPB Corporation
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:50:00 -
[1486]
I would love to know how many CCP Staff intend on buying monocles.
|
Rakshasa Taisab
Caldari Sane Industries Inc. Initiative Mercenaries
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:50:00 -
[1487]
Big Brother CCP Edition; the players vote each week on who stays and who jumps into one of the Icelandic vulcanos.
This great game show would be streamed live as the CCP employees try to convince the players they are worthy of staying.
|
Amira Kornova
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:50:00 -
[1488]
Originally by: Iamien Edited by: Iamien on 24/06/2011 03:46:37
Let us talk with John Turbefield (CCP Diagoras). He is the only CCP Employee that most of us have any respect for at the moment.
We do not want someone with media training.
|
Haida noAzu
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:51:00 -
[1489]
Fix and improve the SPACE-SHIP aspect of the game
trash all the rest
|
Your Main
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:51:00 -
[1490]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: LordElfa
Originally by: Zverofaust
Quote:
Are you moving beyond VANITY AUR items?
I was told there was a big obvious yellow message waiting for me later on.
I honestly cannot answer that right now nor should you hear any such answer from me as many have said. As Pann opened this thread, she stated, "I wonÆt be able to answer all of your questions tonight, but I promise weÆll start getting some info out tomorrow."
The reason why I am going through every post and not just skipping to the end unless someone tells me to, is so that I can make sure the nuances of the player responses are condensed, fully represented and then transmitted within CCP to the appropriate people. (Jade Constantine's post is one obvious verbatim one amongst)
Player feedback has diligently been sent from our community and PR team since time immemorial and it is my most solemn and serious duty.
It is more important right now than trying to "solve" things or crusading to answer every single post. That was pretty clear after a short second of introspection following my second or third reply at around page 5.
My good man, you appear to have trained Diplomacy V as well as the previously unreleased Pandering V - would you care to comment on the release date of Pandering as a player trainable skill?
|
|
danile666
Peripheral Madness
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:51:00 -
[1491]
Originally by: CCP Manifest
Originally by: Evelgrivion Edited by: Evelgrivion on 24/06/2011 00:36:49 Here's my big question that I demand an answer to.
Are you going to **** the EVE Online sandbox over for Monetary Transactions or not? If not, all is forgiven. If MTs are going to impact the sandbox, start printing your resumes and god help you all.
The designs we will implement in game will not **** over the sandbox.
So you are stating that you will never in the future of eve implement any kind of change other than vanity changes to the Sandbox...if you implement anything other than vanity YOU ARE ****ING OVER THE SANDBOX and can put yourself up there with such game companies as ijji...who are considered childish little ***** games...
|
Frau Klaps
Amarr Trillionaire High-Rollers Suicidal Bassoon Orkesta
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:52:00 -
[1492]
Originally by: Obsidian Hawk 4. There was also a thread that showed that the gallente pleasure hub is still in the ship spinning menus, and they loaded it into their game. PLEASE PLEASE bring that back (not really incarna but while we are on the topic of stations)
That was a static image which was used to replace the really boring static door image
But YES, we need spinning AND the pleasure hub back. ~~~
(ಠ_ృ)
|
Che Jin
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:52:00 -
[1493]
Right about now some CCP accountant is crunching numbers and seeing if subs are crashing from rage quit. I'd be willing to bet there is someone up there saying "This is merely a minor dip in the greater pattern of profits. We're going to have to break a few eggs to make a great cake. Let's wait them out and eventually Pavlovian theory will bring them back crawling... and then we can charge them an additional re-subscription fee on top of the normal subscription."
Then another egghead steps up and says "True. In addition, we can ensure robust profits and recovered dividends by charging an additional inactive character storage and maintenance fee for allowing non-subscribed players to retain their accounts intact".
Silence from these kinds of guys is never good. It means they got caught doing something wrong and they've learned how to be a little bit more sneaky about their next round of buttsehks. |
Dasatei
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:52:00 -
[1494]
Unsubbing
Live short and may you never make any more money
|
Jaber Nu
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:53:00 -
[1495]
I, frankly, like the changes. Some will never be happy or assume all of ccp is out to get them, let them cancel and find another game. There are plenty of gamers like me who welcome change and opportunity. I trust there is a lot of potential ahead after Incarna. Besides, those of us who do a lot of trading and corp operations need a little eye candy. If only others could understand that. Who wants to look at a random crap ship all day while maintaining operation.
NEX: I have a hunch that the fear throughout ccp was that the Incarna would turn into a fashionista runway once introduced. Nobody wants that obviously. Insanely priced items would immediately thwart that pink too too purchasing drive. Only an idiot or a 10 year old with a credit card would pay NEX prices. If the intension was to mitigate this effect, it worked but was kind of done in an insulting way. I feel, down the line, as long as the clothing doesn't get obnoxious, the NEX prices should fall into reasonable market value. Think cultural dress for factions or CEO presentation attire. Create their value in EVE. Racing stripes and monocles? So what? Impressions have far more value, and can make or break the deal.
CQ: Great start but the real win is what lies behind the containment door. Lighting should be fixed or made adjustable. When docking from space, load the character facing the ship, not the CQ for quick change and departure if needed, and add item, delivery, and corp hanger folder selections to the balcony control panel. In the CQ, more interface options. More screens maybe, star map hologram, add holograms for corp members in chat. CQ = communication and interface in my book, charts and instruments and orders.
Characters: By far the best I've seen in an MMO yet. Unfortunately the CQ lighting does not do justice to the level of detail of the character. I am impressed with how they move kinesthetically, somewhat blocky but that can be worked on. Foot noise can be softened a bit, except for heels (one should know if they wear heels). Walking paths could be smoother and not so rigidly angled.
Ship Spiny thing: Just undock and fly the thing already. Who cares? I don't get what the big deal is. The perspective of the currently selected ship is awesome and deserves a much needed applause. It does spin by the way (just slowly).
All-in-all, keep up the good work. I will DEFINATELY keep my subscription. |
Garresh
Minmatar Hole Patrol Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:53:00 -
[1496]
Hey Manifest, heed my words. I play League of Legends as well. Their current model, while very well designed, comes at the expense of balance and gameplay. Their ban system in ranked is not a strategy element. It's a band aid applied so that the current OP champs that were released too quickly don't break competitive play.
Eve has no such feature, and cannot implement one without ****ing things up.
Moving on, there is a lot that can be learned from various games like League, and even Evony. But again, these must be applied to the context of vanity items. IF you can tell us straight that it will only be vanity items, then I can guarantee that this same community is ready and willing to HELP in the design process towards what kind of MT vanity items we want. I can't tell you how much real money I've spent just on skins in League of Legends. They're ****ing awesome. But after a few months when it became apparent that I needed all my resources just to acquire all the champions needed to be competitive in ranked(Even champs I didn't play, I had to own so I could do swaps), I stopped buying skins altogether. They designed inconvenience and disadvantage into their game, and as a result I stopped spending money on skins. Soon after, I became annoyed and stopped spending money on League altogether. I still play, but I no longer give them my money. I am waiting for a better game, DOTA 2. There are lessons to be learned here.
"Hobby" is a key word here. That word was used to describe players for whom Eve is not a game, but a casual way to pass the time. Those same players are probably the ones most likely to care about visual assets, so I don't see why you need to push past vanity anyways.
Now, on to other things to be learned. If you keep the core gameplay fun, people will want to spend money on trivial things. If the gameplay loses fun, we won't want to invest money. MT can work, and if the game stays true I already know I'm gonna be throwing cash at this game for purely cosmetic things.
Sorry if this post is a little ramble-y, but I'm about to sleep and check up tomorrow. Before I leave though, some final thoughts: RMT for visual things can work. What we really need is SHIP DECALS and effects. Nothing overwhelming, but stuff that looks cool and allows us to customize our ship.
What if you implemented an Aurum decals system based on the current eve research and production system. I.E. you could research up various decals to unlock new types, or use an invention style mechanic to risk losing access to a decal to try for much cooler ones. Limited run decals which could be sold IN EVE for Aurum. Essentially, a player driven cosmetics economy, with aurum taxes on transactions(thereby allowing you to remove aurum passively and get more income). A system like this would never affect combat, and be purely cosmetic. However, it would also be largely player driven, as players would then be able to perform cosmetics trading. Of importance: This may use some sort of aurum related skills, but while you could invest in game skill points and isk into this career path, you could not necessarily reap isk from the aurum gained. Obviously, this is just a rough idea, but a player driven aurum economy with it's own invention, production, and research system would be a very "eve friendly" way to handle the situation, and preserve the sandbox.
|
wraith01
Gallente Viper Intel Squad
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:53:00 -
[1497]
Thank god BF3 and the new starwars mmo are on their way. If you bring all this crap in it might be time to sell up undock and go out in a blaze of glory.
|
Zaledias xavinox
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:53:00 -
[1498]
ok I've only just started playing this game but it is easy to see that if aur goes beyond vanity items its almost as bad as the bob incedent i read about allies and corps willing to drop the cash will get the advantage...think I'm just going to go unsubscribe until an answer comes.
|
Maplestone
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:53:00 -
[1499]
Originally by: CCP Pann I would appreciate it if you would confirm my observations or tell me what IÆm missing, but I do ask that you do it in a productive way.
I'm 40 pages late to the party, but I notice that RMT-hate is not mentioned. The community has obviously not fully embraced the concept of the Noble Exchange and that point onspiciously absent from your list. Am I to read that ommission as an acknowledgement that its existance is not open to discussion?
A general rule of thumb I've noticed over the years is that if a business is afraid to discuss a topic with their customers, it's probably not an ethical idea in the first place.
|
Zedah Zoid
Adhocracy Incorporated
|
Posted - 2011.06.24 03:54:00 -
[1500]
As I see it the primary issues are not as outlined in the OP as has been made completely clear by now. To reiterate and just add another reply to the thread.
1) No microtransactions that allow players to purchase items that can affect performance in game when these items bypass the current Eve economy including production and resource gathering/effort.
2) If CCP needs to raise the price of Eve Online to fund development of other games then do so. But do it within the confines of the subscription which works very well in this unique and wonderful game that you have created. And throw us a bone and fix some of the crap that is broken in your cash cow that we love so much we keep playing despite all the broken stuff.
3) Don't lie to us, either to our face or via the CSM. Lying is simply bad.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 [50] 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 .. 449 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |