|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 14:13:00 -
[1]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
For the record, my regular exploration routes usually will have up to half a dozen signatures per system with about the same amount of anomaly's, if not more. I also have 'special' exploration routes that usually have up to 2 dozen signatures with twice as many anomaly's per system.
This (and many of your other posts in this thread) renders all of your "data" worthless.
Where is this magic land that has 72 sites per system? LOL
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 14:29:00 -
[2]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Originally by: Holdout
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
For the record, my regular exploration routes usually will have up to half a dozen signatures per system with about the same amount of anomaly's, if not more. I also have 'special' exploration routes that usually have up to 2 dozen signatures with twice as many anomaly's per system.
This (and many of your other posts in this thread) renders all of your "data" worthless.
Where is this magic land that has 72 sites per system? LOL
Like I'm really going to tell you?
Go out and search for them yourself.
It's obvious you're not an explorer or you'd know what I'm talking about.
It's obvious you're exaggerating, and you know what I'm talking about.
Strings of systems with 70+ sites in them? Sure. I bet all the anomalies are Scout Outposts.
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.11 21:14:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Jireel Edited by: Jireel on 11/04/2011 20:57:04
Originally by: Holdout
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
For the record, my regular exploration routes usually will have up to half a dozen signatures per system with about the same amount of anomaly's, if not more. I also have 'special' exploration routes that usually have up to 2 dozen signatures with twice as many anomaly's per system.
This (and many of your other posts in this thread) renders all of your "data" worthless.
Where is this magic land that has 72 sites per system? LOL
My nullsec static opened 3 days ago in a system (AAA sov, didnt write down the sys) that had around 40 sites, and I was able to so them the whole evening without seeing anyone in local. Just sayin'.
I understand what you're just sayin'.
The fact that you found a single system with around 40 sites in sovereign nullsec really has no bearing on his claim of "special routes in hisec containing 70+ sites in each system".
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.12 15:26:00 -
[4]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Wow, you really do excel at twisting players statements around while trying to justify your failure at reading comprehension.
I never listed system security level nor did I give an exact amount of sites found within a specific system. It was a general estimation for maxium potential of what has been found there in the past. I also never said there was a 'string' of these systems all located within the same area.
You took it upon yourself to create false statements and assume it to be factual and then failed at trying to disprove what I had written. Jireel verified my statement but you still decided to troll and personally attack me through these forums in this and other threads.
Just because you haven't found any systems in isolated areas packed with multiple signatures doesn't mean they don't exist. Get up off your lazy duff and go check it out yourself before trolling someone. While you're at it, stop twisting statements around and adding false info as factual quotes.
LOL
You are the one who claims to have these "special routes" with huge strings of systems that "usually contain up to 70+" sites". I'm not the one trolling here buddy.
You remind me of that guy who claims to make 400 million ISK per hour running L4 missions. Something that happened one time when you got really lucky is not the same as "usually".
At any rate, the initial claim that you made where "nothing is wrong, you people are just lazy" has been refuted. My job is done here.
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.13 21:59:00 -
[5]
Originally by: DeMichael Crimson
Again you fail at reading comprehension and continue to twist statements around and mix in false information trying to save face in an attempt to pass it off as factual quotes.
Obviously you're not only a Forum Troll, but a lying immature person who has been proved wrong and can't accept it. Do us all a favor and go climb back into your dung hole.
At this point (and the post before actually) I'm just trying to see how many times you'll say the same thing over again before you get tired of it. Apparently never?
I haven't been proven wrong. You have. Deal with it?
|
Holdout
|
Posted - 2011.04.19 13:52:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Deezlar Ward
Originally by: UPS Hauler
Originally by: Deezlar Ward
I ran some high sec systems around Jita last night to test out a new ship, and scanned 2 Radar sites after 6 systems.... So arguably the most populated area of the game has (potentially) a better chance to spawn Radar than low sec.... Kinda defeats the object of EXPLORING!
Yeah your 6 system sample definitely warrants such a definitive conclusion.
Trolling?
I said nothing about definitive proof. But its a fair assumption to make seeing as the 60+ systems I scanned and recorded gave such small results, where 6 high sec systems gave far better.
When you're talking about statistical analysis, there really are no fair assumptions when dealing with such an insignificant sample.
|
|
|
|