|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.01.11 16:35:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Mike Roche Widow: 5% to hybrid optimal, 5% to hybrid damage per level, 30% bonus to ECM target jammer strength
Why would you give hybrid boni to a scorpion hull?
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 15:25:00 -
[2]
I agree, let it be able to probe out cloaked ships, require Astrometrics V .
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.02.17 20:32:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Xtover on 17/02/2010 20:33:43
Originally by: Zurin Arctus
Originally by: Xtover I agree, let it be able to probe out cloaked ships, require Astrometrics V .
Idea of giving Black Ops a boost supported, but Xtover is a ****tard.
Wow you shoot the messenger too, eh? How DARE someone support a topic you don't agree with!
Quote: Issue one: According to CCP, the current database/server structuring does not allow people to query the location of cloaked ships. Everything would have to be overhauled to allow this.
[citation needed]
if there's no query showing how to find cloaked ships, however every ship and every item in a system has a coordinate. look it up when you make a bookmark. It's not in place but can be. I'd LOVE to see that quote. Please find it for me.
Quote:
Issue two: Even if it were feasible, would you really want to break cloaking by allowing anyone to scan down a cloaked ship? Bad idea and you should feel bad.
It's not breaking cloaking. it's taking a BLACK OPS VESSEL TO HUNT DOWN ANOTHER. it's a ship that costs anywhere from half to three-quarters of a billion isk (more than a carrier, for example), and that currently less people own than own titans in the game... LESS THAN 300 PEOPLE FLY THEM, and most don't want to train for it let alone spend the ISK.
First, I love everything cloaky. over 90% of my main's kills are in bombers.
I however also can fly a widow and would love to see it more useful instead of sitting in a station.
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.02.19 17:09:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Saerynn Supporting significantly more love for BOBS to justify the cost and training. To start: - COCD - Increased base jump range - Increased fuel bay - Reduced portal consumption - T2 resists
I'd also like to see CCP revisit the bonuses and slot layouts on a per-ship basis, but I'm not going to hold my breath. I don't support allowing covert cynos in high-sec.
I'd like to retract my support for allowing probing of cloaked ships, and reserve that for a new T2 destroyer class.
However I support the above, AND cynos in hisec. The only reason they're not allowed is because empires have "cynojammed every hisec system"
since they can bypass cynojammers, it only makes sense.
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.03.01 12:35:00 -
[5]
Originally by: SkwisgaarSkwigelf Edited by: SkwisgaarSkwigelf on 01/03/2010 07:24:45 Panther and Sin need some major love still. Speed bonus? Lame.
Covops cloaks, I think yes.
Jump range... that's a tough one to make a call on.
The ability to scan down cloakers would be a nice counter, but would have to be evaluated carefully. Personally I would like to see a covops style t2 battlecruiser, maybe that would be a good role for such a ship. (T2 hurricane? pure sex!)
*EDIT* Nevermind. I re-evaluated my edit and edited it out.
not at T2 BC, a T2 destroyer- but anyway.
a covops cloak is a must have to the BOBS- sure it's powerful but also super expensive and skill-intensive.
as to jump range... 2ly is horrible. with JDC IV I can jump 13ly with a carrier.
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.03.08 19:24:00 -
[6]
The CSM minutes didn't really give any info.
|
Xtover
Suicide Kings
|
Posted - 2010.03.14 15:52:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Sokratesz
Originally by: Xtover The CSM minutes didn't really give any info.
Then I suggest you read them again =p unless of course you want to know exactly how they wil be fixed - but I doubt even CCP knows that at this time.
yeah, that's kinda where I was going with that. Maybe a HINT.
I have the ISK ready to grab another widow, when it's viable.
|
|
|
|