| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. The collapse of RISE, a story by a member of - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: WhatIsItGoodFor on 01/02/2008 23:41:11 .
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2008.02.01 23:39:00
|
2. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
As happens, real life has interfered with the writing of the final three Analysis posts that are yet to come, although for anyone interested, there's an interview with me up on Eve Tribune. However, recent events prompt me to bump this thread wit...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.24 13:37:00
|
3. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Apologies for the delay on Part 5. I hope to have it finished within the next 8 hours, but that depends on a few things. It might have to wait until tomorrow.
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.15 20:24:00
|
4. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
On the other hand, the cooperative nations model is more likely to affect the War than vice versa -- specifically, the RSF's ability to continue acting as a cohesive entity despite being multiple entities will significantly affect their success or...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 20:20:00
|
5. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Second, the limitation of sovereignty maintenance and control to alliances experienced in and equipped to handle them even under hostile conditions. While the GBC model distributes this effort across multiple tenants, the RSF model relies on a sel...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 20:19:00
|
6. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Pros First, the model creates a clear chain of command; BoB is in charge. Tenants are likely given a degree of autonomy, in that I doubt they are obligated to join BoB military fleets but rather frequently do so because they see the mutual bene...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 20:18:00
|
7. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
I exclude IAC and AAA, only because while those groups are part of the powerbloc in the current war, if the war were to go in the favor of the larger Coalition's favor, it is questionable whether they would maintain as close a political relationsh...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 20:18:00
|
8. War Analysis Part 4: Coldest of All Cold Monsters - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Previously: War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks Coldest of All Cold Monsters Today, I'll be examining the social/governmental structures of the two major "powerblocs," describing the pros and cons of each. Personally, I find this aspect of Eve...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 20:17:00
|
9. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Kweel Nakashyn (I'll quote a few time from some of your 4 post) Originally by: WhatIsItGoodFor Examples given include the crashing morale of GS members pre-titan nerf and the argument that the acceptance of former L...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 18:24:00
|
10. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Natas Dog Originally by: WhatIsItGoodFor I believe this tactic was also used in Tenerifis and Omist by RSF, and perhaps by the GBC (someone more familiar with that can chime in). Pretty much, we didn't put up muc...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:53:00
|
11. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Grimpak Edited by: Grimpak on 13/10/2007 00:38:47 there is a part where you went wrong. "pos spam" as in the ole RA vs LV days is gone. nowadays, you can only spam 5 pos per system a day or smth. many claim that this ...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:46:00
|
12. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
This is, yet again, a reason supporting my claims that many smaller alliances will be driven out before either side begins to work on the other's proper territory; the major power blocs have proven to be the only ones who can reliably engage in th...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:23:00
|
13. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
This either results in two massive fleets, or, if the defending alliance cannot raise an adequate defense fleet, an undefended POS which takes an incredibly long time to put into reinforced. Station Services The inclusion of station services...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:22:00
|
14. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Such a change would represent a serious balancing challenge for CCP. As stated, in a lagless world I believe the current system would be both enjoyable and relatively balanced. A new system would need to be balanced while also forcing numbers down...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:22:00
|
15. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Bein Glorious' Titan Thread to End All Titan Threads is an excellent review of the game-breaking issues created by pre-nerf Titans. While many disagreed with his suggested changes -- and they were not the same as those eventually implemented by ...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:21:00
|
16. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Previously: War Analysis Part 2: What Is It Good For Review and Response The two previous installments have built my argument that the primary players in the War (BoB/MC, RSF) are able to withstand pressures that will ***** most (if not al...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:20:00
|
17. War Analysis Part 3: CCP Sucks - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
There are always going to be debatable changes, or outright failures; the best that any of us can do is to keep in mind that CCP is willing to listen to player input, if it is well-argued, supported, and presented. With the sucking up out of the ...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.13 00:20:00
|
18. War Analysis Part 2: What Is It Good For - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Kweel Nakashyn Originally by: WhatIsItGoodFor For RA and TCF, they are bound primarily by real life nationality -- Russian and French. While most of players from TCF are french, it's primarilly a french speacking ...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.11 23:55:00
|
19. War Analysis Part 2: What Is It Good For - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
It is important to state, as I have before, that I make no personal judgments about the motivations, desires, or methods being discussed; I state this not in an effort to appear overly impartial, but rather because I can understand both attitudes ...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.11 23:42:00
|
20. War Analysis Part 2: What Is It Good For - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
Previously: War Analysis Part 1: Death of Alliances What Is It Good For Yesterday, I laid out four broad aspects of territorial alliance collapse, and claimed that the major players in the War (BoB/MC and the RSF) were only vulnerable to r...
- by WhatIsItGoodFor - at 2007.10.11 23:40:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |