EVE Search - Posts by Sykes

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 35 for by author Sykes (0,22 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2
1. Darkness Visible - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] Aboard the Rapier class Force Recon Cruiser, JFS Poor Impulse Control , at a safe-spot, cloaked, region: classified, system: classified. A faint tang of smoke still hung in the air on the bridge despite the strained whirring of cheap life-supp... - by Sykes - at 2008.09.06 14:28:00
2. The Black Plan - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] Originally by: Darina Rea Maybe a silly question, but consider the SF's theater of operation is lower security and higher security space... and this thing is prohibited from entering both those, what exactly is it good for? Albeit a very f... - by Sykes - at 2008.09.06 12:40:00
3. Seventy-Five Days of Anarchy û The Star Fraction and the Militias - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] Ah OK, rhetoric, fair enough :) - by Sykes - at 2008.08.29 21:57:00
4. Seventy-Five Days of Anarchy û The Star Fraction and the Militias - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] Who then? - by Sykes - at 2008.08.29 21:51:00
5. Seventy-Five Days of Anarchy û The Star Fraction and the Militias - in Intergalactic Summit [original thread] How are you planning to exterminate us Victoria? - by Sykes - at 2008.08.29 21:26:00
6. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Garreck Originally by: NeoTheo (i am sure CVA would have liked to participate, but unlike SF CVA have left it alone) Not a fair comparison at all. CVA doesn't participate in FW as much because we have a region of ... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.29 10:48:00
7. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Farrqua Edited by: Farrqua on 21/08/2008 19:45:53 The FW'rs want their own little game where outside parties can not affect it at all. Another words they want a safe exclusive PVP zone where they do not have to deal with... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.21 20:36:00
8. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] One of the things that makes Eve special is that it's a single universe sandbox where the players create 'reality' to a far larger extent than they do in other MMORPGs. That means you get emergent effects that weren't intended by the designers, in... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.21 16:50:00
9. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Sykes on 21/08/2008 15:11:40 Pithecanthropus, if you took responsibility for defending yourselves, you wouldn't need a 'fix' from CCP ... It's not like you don't have the necessary numbers, were you only able to organise them. - by Sykes - at 2008.08.21 15:06:00
10. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Well, different people have different motivations. Many Eve pilots set themselves conventional objectives. For example to take a piece of 0.0 for themselves, build outposts, mine moons, get rich, have laggy fleet battles and so on. The majority ... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.21 13:53:00
11. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Sykes on 19/08/2008 19:45:13 Thing is, Star Fraction players and various third parties including a selection of SF's deadliest enemies have patiently explained a large variety of approaches that you could take to defend yourselves a... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.19 19:40:00
12. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Farrqua <snip> So my suggestion was to have the player corps join one big corp with shared command of the top FC's in your militia. Hence you will be able to centralize your command, organize your selves in a much cle... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.19 19:28:00
13. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] We don't recognise anybody's right to 'hold space' so that bit is kind of academic in any case. Some primitive's theological stuff. What I'm having trouble reconciling with reality is this business about these 50 man fleets chasing us. Chasing us... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.18 23:26:00
14. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Imaginary fleets chasing us apart, isn't Tama in The Citadel? Did the Caldari militia lose Citadel low-sec to the Gallente guys? - by Sykes - at 2008.08.18 23:10:00
15. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Edited by: Sykes on 17/08/2008 22:48:04 Quite. I am continually shocked and disappointed by the lack of moral fibre and self-sufficiency shown by these militia guys. They are immortal pod pilots, able to fly high-tech engines of destruction o... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.17 22:47:00
16. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Originally by: Tara Armitage Originally by: Mankirks Wife After thinking about this some, I think a good course of action ... I'd have to think about this a bit more, but on first sight it does look quite interesting and work... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.17 15:42:00
17. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] We've had nerf after nerf to make these people happy, but they obviously won't be satisfied until we're playing WoW in space, with elves. So let's just kill 'em all, repeatedly, until they go away. - by Sykes - at 2008.08.16 23:30:00
18. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] It does rather seem that the first reaction of the Caldari militia corps to adversity is not to work out how to fight back, but rather to scream for some further aspect of PvP to be nerfed. I think that's rather a pity myself and not necessarily g... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.16 21:20:00
19. Corps side steping FW in attemps to effect it's outcome. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] I must admit that I'm puzzled by the assumption of helplessness by so many Caldari militia members here. OK, so SF has some fairly experienced players in T2 ships. We also have only a few dozen pilots in total though, rarely more than a dozen ac... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.16 11:00:00
20. Speed Rebalanced: Feedback thread - in Game Development Forum [original thread] Here's a well thought-out alternative approach to fixing speed from a very respected PvP'r, which has considerable player support. http://myeve.eve-online.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=840290 This approach, or any of several other less s... - by Sykes - at 2008.08.16 09:59:00
Pages: [1] 2
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.