Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:New dev blog: Backwards Then Forwards - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Inferno, not a bad name. This expansion better bring many new things to skill for, it's been ages since I don't know what to do with my SP.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.02.23 06:56:00
|
2. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tore Vest wrote: I guess CCP is tired of this game....... Ontopic: Last erebus killed went down within 5 minutes... How fast have CCP planned that the lagest ship in EVE should die ? 30 sec ? That Erebus was logged off, didn't have any a...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.16 11:25:00
|
3. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Xhondo Dhoru wrote: Supers that are solo or in small groups are far easier to kill than those with 50 in gang. The upcoming changes will strongly discourage the people who use them in smaller engagements from continuing to do so, and will esse...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.05 13:44:00
|
4. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
You're delluding yourself. The few players using supercaps for solo pvp do it because they want risk-free pvp. They'll log in their supers only when they expect to fight at most a handfull of subcap, and when there is no risk to be hotdropped. Ty...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.05 07:15:00
|
5. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Draconus Lofwyr wrote: the easiest compromise is just to remove the drone number bonus from non fighter drones. so its back to the base 5 non-fighter drones if i have to use those types to defend myself and leave the drone bay as is. Her'...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.04 14:50:00
|
6. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Caldari Naga - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Not sure I like the design, but I could get used to it, I suppose. However, if the Naga remain the only BC whose weapons are boosted by only one ship bonus, I have zero interest in using one.
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.04 11:54:00
|
7. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Amarr Oracle - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
They said it would be a little cheaper than battleships. I suspect somewhere around 45-50M.
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.03 11:54:00
|
8. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Brandon Tsero wrote: Super-carriers should honestly be able to carry 20 stealth bombers, 20 fighters, and at least have 5000 drone bay left to work with small anti sub-cap drones. Make them able to fight back in a Super vs. 100 sub cap fleet th...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.11.03 09:03:00
|
9. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Space Ra wrote: Lucky I don't fly a moros, whit rate of fire bonus there gone be even more cap hungry, itGÇÖs like dropping a low slot... And if you chance capacitor leves, that would mean extra tanking. For a mother ship/super carrier (master...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.29 19:32:00
|
10. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
HELIC0N ONE wrote: Charles Edisson wrote: HICs are disigned to tackle supers after all, Dictors were not. You realise that when supercaps lost their bubble immunity, Hictors hadn't even been introduced to the game yet? Revelations II ex...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.28 20:41:00
|
11. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Gallente Talos - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The ship look beautiful. However, I'm not happy about the web bonus, because that will pigeon-hole the ship to a blasterboat role. Every other new BC look like they will be effective whetever the range, if you fit them as snipers or brawlers, so ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.27 16:02:00
|
12. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Minmatar Tornado - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rip Minner wrote: I should have been more clear. The Abbadon, Maelstrom, Armageddon and Tempest will be replaced as the fleet standard in PVP when you can field 2 times as many Teir 3 BC with the same amount of isk and when your geting Alphed b...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.25 11:38:00
|
13. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Samanta Raiolaser wrote: First of all, please stop with those references to RL ships and RL money. This is a game, the only thing that should be considered is the effort that is put by someone into something. ... Stuff And even with those n...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.23 16:08:00
|
14. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mioelnir wrote: What he is arguing is basic risk vs reward. You want the reward of a 20b killmail? Bring 20b in ships. Any ships. Even ignoring insurance and putting a fleet bs at an average 200 million, thats 100 fleet bs. I HIGHLY doubt you ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.23 06:05:00
|
15. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Minmatar Tornado - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
David Xavier wrote: The Tornado is absolutely awe inspiring, I just hope that the Gallentean one will not be A BIG AMORPHOUS AMOEBA with engines strapped on it. Imagine the Horror, if it's a giant navitas. The screams would reach the heavens.
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.21 15:06:00
|
16. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Minmatar Tornado - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Able to fit L guns but not enough pg for L repair stuff, I suppose that means a cruiser-like powergrid with a role bonus to weapon powergrid. And fast cap recharge, or the amarr one will run dry fast. Sound very nice, BS-like dps and range withou...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.21 14:47:00
|
17. Sticky:New dev blog: Ship-troduction: The Minmatar Tornado - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
At last, a new ship you can use for everyday pvp without needing to be a multibillionnaire. :) And it would be even better with an actual link. :p
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.21 14:36:00
|
18. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Yes. Disappointed?
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.21 10:43:00
|
19. Sticky:New dev blog: Capital ship balancing - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
John Hand wrote: http://evedreams.wordpress.com/2011/10/21/46/ This guy sounds good. This guy does a lot of ranting but little arguing, bont bother to give any hard number, and back up his point only by claiming that a supercarrier should r...
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.21 08:58:00
|
20. Sticky:New dev blog: My brain was equipped with the following implants - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
This change, I like it.
- by Shadowsword - at 2011.10.20 18:27:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |