Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
1. Is Suicide ganking real PvP - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is real pvp. And at the same time, it's not. I approve of suicide-ganking as a tool to keep idiocy in check. if a Hulk without even a damage control get suicide ganked, I'll applaud. If a faction BS with a 10b fit, or an afk industrial with an...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.23 10:24:00
|
2. CCP We ALL want 12 hr Jump Clone delays not 24 hr. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
If jump clones were completely removed, it would be bothersome for me, but good for the game overall. So I'm in favor of their suppression. A part of what makes Eve a good game is that you have painful choices to makes.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.19 19:51:00
|
3. Remove all highsec faction crossings. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Schalac wrote: You people that are talking about taking the long safe road are not getting the point. There would be no safe way around lowsec. If you want to go to any of the 3 other factions space from the one you are in right now you would h...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.16 14:46:00
|
4. T2 bpo strategy - in Science and Industry [original thread]
I don't know any, but they all follow a general rule: they have a ridiculously long ROI, three to eight years for most. They is so many ways to get more profit from the isks necessary to get one. For example, making copies of some cap ship T1 BPOs.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.14 16:54:00
|
5. T2 BPO's - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Guys, don't feed the troll.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.13 09:12:00
|
6. 94 mil SP. 10 hours to deletion. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thank you for contributing to the overall health of the economy by removing your assets.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.13 09:05:00
|
7. PVP getting hurt by the changes? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Super Chair wrote: PvP with consequences, imagine that Second that. Today pvp is too cheap, I don't have the adrenaline spike I had back in 2004, when using a BS in pvp was putting a week-end of farming on the line.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.12 16:21:00
|
8. so the hulk WTF CCP?!!?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: In order to kill a hulk like how I would fit them would require 4 t2 arty Tornadoes. Shouldn't the gankers have time for at least two arty salvoes before concord show up in a 0.5 or 0.6?
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.12 10:51:00
|
9. MIGHT IS RIGHT - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Sable Moran wrote: Tarsus Zateki wrote: No one is going to read that block of dreck anyway. I did (despite the apparent wall-of-text), and I find the text pretty much spot on. So... Harden the **** up or shut up and get out. Spot on my...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.12 10:48:00
|
10. so the hulk WTF CCP?!!?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What is the max amount of DPS a ganker can do in 0.5 before concord show up?
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.11 16:16:00
|
11. so the hulk WTF CCP?!!?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Adunh Slavy wrote: All the industrail sector ships need an HP bump, and a big bump at that. If they have to cost more in minerals, so be it. No, they simply require people to tank them. When they're tanked, can a single ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.11 06:05:00
|
12. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
A long post full of inconvenient facts? He will ignore it. :/
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.10 21:49:00
|
13. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Exactly and that is the point and you hit the nail on the head. A single inventor can not compete in a single item against a T2BPO owner and that is why T2BPO need removed. Horsecrap. You can easily compete with any...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.10 20:31:00
|
14. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
When they were seeded, it was 8 BPOs for each T2 ship and 16 BPOs for each T2 module. Quite a few have been lost since then, bewteen destructions and canceled accounts.
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.10 11:31:00
|
15. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Hint for the economic noobs: Selling price is related to building cost ONLY on very low-demand items, when margins are so razor-thin that most productors give up on supplying the market. For any item with a reasonnable transaction volume, the ONLY...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.10 05:56:00
|
16. Destroyer vs 325mil is balanced. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dbars Grinding wrote: This is clearly fair. Explain to me how a destroyer can kill your Hulk with Damage control II, shield extender rigs and shield hardeners/extenders, before concord save the day. What? You didn't tank your Hulk? Then ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.09 22:01:00
|
17. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Bluestream3 wrote: Ok. Saying that T2 BPOs are completely irrelevant to inventors is just as much of a logic fail as to say that the minerals I mine are free. Also don't say that no one cares, you seem to care at least a bit since you're writi...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.09 21:55:00
|
18. the importance of T2 BPOs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Scrapyard Bob wrote: Agreed. It doesn't mean that I can't wish for little things like: - T1 BPC ME/PE having an effect on the resulting T2 BPC ME/PE (such as Sqrt(T1 BPC ME)-5 = T2 BPC ME). - Asking for the decryptors to be rebalanced. - L...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.09 17:50:00
|
19. Clarification on T2BPO topics. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Lyrrashae wrote: Re-posting locked topics/threads is against the forum rules, though. Hope you find something more productive to do during your almost-certainly-impending ban! Naw I don't think I'll get banned for ...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.09 17:44:00
|
20. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Stella SGP wrote: nom nom nom MOAR TEARS! Quotes from supporters of T2BPO. As you can see they are idiots. Still not a single reason for keeping them not one. Reasons were given in the locked thread, but since th...
- by Shadowsword - at 2012.04.08 19:06:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |