Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Some DUSTfully new news. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tialano Utrigas wrote: Why is it, everytime a feature of Dust is raised on the forums for discussion, does someone insist on bringing up the fact it is on PS3 and not PC?? I'm bored of hearing it now, we would all love for it to be on PC but...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.22 20:47:00
|
2. What is the avatar above you thinking? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
*insert Commander Riker quote here*
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.14 05:35:00
|
3. Some DUSTfully new news. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Paul Oliver wrote: Msgerbs wrote: Would be even cooler if I could play it without giving Sony my money for a console I'll only use for one game. Bah, theirs tons of super cheap used PS3 games now, and super cheap used PS3s for that matter....
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.14 05:33:00
|
4. Some DUSTfully new news. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Would be even cooler if I could play it without giving Sony my money for a console I'll only use for one game.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.14 05:24:00
|
5. EVE, Alcohol, and other substances - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I've never played EVE drunk (or been drunk at all), but I've been in plenty of nullsec fleets with drunk people (including a few FCs)... Had buckets of fun. "It's just a drake on a gate, why isn't it dead yet?!"
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.14 05:22:00
|
6. Why Ninja Salvaging should be considered an exploit - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP has stated at least 50 times that they don't consider salvage to be anybody's property. Also: Jorma Morkkis wrote: Herping yourDerp wrote: you could always come back in a pvp ship and fight too And then their Falcon alt uncloaks at m...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.09.14 05:20:00
|
7. Incursions decimated by nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
J3ssica Alba wrote: If enough people keep repeating a bunch of nonsense loudly enough, CCP acts on it unfortunately. I used to run Incursions and no I didn't really do it for the money. There are other professions that make much more money (wit...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.06.03 08:52:00
|
8. Bombs in Low Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Because generally speaking AOE is something reserved for nullsec. AOE warp disruption, AOE damage, etc.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.05.31 01:07:00
|
9. Daemons "One a Day" Program for a better life and Eve Experience - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I love this post.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.05.30 23:25:00
|
10. Is there a shortage off Low- and Nullsec players? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The problem is that nobody is willing to risk being blown up (except in suicide ganks) and so won't fight anything they don't have superior numbers and ship types against. Some say that this is "winning" "strategy" and "doing it right". And while ...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.05.30 23:16:00
|
11. What the goons should have done as a response - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No, it would not have been cool. Funny as it might've been seeing a bunch of goons self destructing, the way you're putting it is just wrong. >Encourage guy to commit suicide >Commit suicide yourself > ???? >Profit?
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.05.06 17:36:00
|
12. Need help starting out!! New to game! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
1) Do all the tutorial missions 2) Don't trust anybody 3) Ignore the 12-year-olds chestbeating 4) Find a good corp, join them.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.05.06 17:34:00
|
13. Ring Mining Mechanic, did CCP say Random Spawning? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So moons are now completely pointless. Nice.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.04.01 16:33:00
|
14. The Anti-Swarm - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kallynda Nai wrote: Serene Repose wrote: It isn't a flame war. Mitt clearly violated the terms he agreed to when becoming a member of the CSM. Maybe he should have taken such incidentals more seriously. Maybe he applies to real life the same...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.03.28 08:24:00
|
15. My Apology - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Inc spike wrote: I actually just LOST respect for you posting this apology. You know damn well you don't mean it, and anyone who can't handle some "cyber bullying" doesn't need to be playing EVE. We all know this is political ass kissing for C...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.03.28 06:47:00
|
16. CCP finally plans somthing against moon goo. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nothing that expands on incursions can ever be a good thing, unless that expansion comes in the form of expanded ways to disrupt them.
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.03.25 06:11:00
|
17. Fanfest: Crimewatch - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kessiaan wrote: I think it'll have just the opposite effect. Seems more like a disguised consensual pvp flag than anything else. I know everyone hates on the idea but I think may lead to a resurgence of solo pvp (and all the asshattery that goe...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.03.25 06:06:00
|
18. Eve website front page - here to stay? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have no problem with adding fancy graphics and new player information dropdowns... But now I have to go to a different website just to get what I want. What was wrong with having a menu bar down the side of the page showing all the different pag...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.02.07 19:46:00
|
19. Reason Why Removing Local would not fix the null botting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tenris Anis wrote: RubyPorto wrote: The incursion issue is the income. But the income is relatively low. So there is no issue? Furthermore I am not saying that old content should be removed for group content, just more pve content as inc...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.02.07 19:41:00
|
20. Reason Why Removing Local would not fix the null botting. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Razin wrote: Nova Fox wrote: They can inhumanly press Dscan every second and if there is a newer entry than them they cloak up until number of entries matches them again. That is all. It's pretty clear the the current d-scan needs to be...
- by Msgerbs - at 2012.02.07 19:40:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |