Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
21. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: The crowd in here that believes in nerfing ships forever doesn't seem to understand that it is not and will never be a solution because the ships are not the problem. CCP already buffed super capitals. Now they are scaling ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:44:00
|
22. So the Goons ultimately want to break Eve... to save it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gealbhan wrote: Actually stomach bug and 2h sleep in the last 36. I wouldn't mind a heavily spiked drink lol. I'm serious though, select CSM members are getting to cocky for their own good & the good of the game. Ugh, I've had serious ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:40:00
|
23. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cozmik R5 wrote: Mendolus wrote: EVE is not about "fit this , or fly that , or you lose Funny that most Corp and Alliance brass seem to think that way... It's a balancing act, for every time CCP changes a game mechanic to prevent ex...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:34:00
|
24. So the Goons ultimately want to break Eve... to save it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Gealbhan wrote: Disband the CSM, ban the rebel leaders. Problem solved. It seems some people think they can fight CCP with the gloves off. I wonder how much CCP is going to flex an iron fist to prove otherwise. The way I see it they got two ch...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:24:00
|
25. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Slade Trillgon wrote: I do not think I need to post this due to Tippia, Brooks, and Mendolus, but what the hell. Hicksimus wrote: The issue is that there are too many super capitals due to a limited number of barriers to getting them. ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:19:00
|
26. So the Goons ultimately want to break Eve... to save it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ingvar Angst wrote: Weaselior wrote: 0.0 embargos moon minerals not ABC ore for this plan you nitwit If they gained full control of ABC and ice, why stop at the moon? Slade's dead on though... it's impossible to not sit back and stare in...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 17:08:00
|
27. So the Goons ultimately want to break Eve... to save it? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They have two choices, burn it all to the ground (much more entertaining I must say) or conquer and/or establish a game wide win where no one is left with anything to do but sit idly by and pray CCP breaks the stalemate. The former option, one ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 16:58:00
|
28. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
lol
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 16:46:00
|
29. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: This is interesting. Do you guys actually believe that if it takes 12 super carriers next year to do exactly what 10 do this year they will have somehow have fixed the imbalance? Especially because as you've said resources are...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 16:15:00
|
30. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: ... The problem is that your supposed elite players are self-deprecating. Your solution can only support so many subscribers and CCP has already exceeded that level of subscriptions years ago, not only in overhead costs...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 15:36:00
|
31. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hicksimus wrote: ...because it'll take 6 months to get another titan if they happen to be bait. I'm sorry, but making stuff take even longer to manufacture is excessively boring sounding. This is a game, I'd rather they nerf ships so they ar...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 15:14:00
|
32. connecting PI networks with other playes. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would be nice, esp. for those of us that can or do run PI on multiple accounts, but I don't see stuff like that coming along until maybe DUST514 itself, and even then I'm not so sure... ...you are right that it should be there, in the sense th...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 14:56:00
|
33. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brooks Puuntai wrote: Mendolus wrote: Brooks, way to end the thread before it even started! Sheesh, how are the haters gonna hate now? His argument is actually a lot better then most I've seen. True, he has presented a fairly well...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 14:43:00
|
34. Why does balance always involve nerfing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Brooks, way to end the thread before it even started! Sheesh, how are the haters gonna hate now?
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.04 14:31:00
|
35. We were ganked! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Oh internet peoples, whatever did we do for amusement before the internet? I imagine we had to go to the zoo to see behavior like this, or the circus for that matter I suppose.
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.03 14:59:00
|
36. Supers nurf WRONG - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This thread is shameful, quit bumping it , you have no idea what you're talking about. Edit: Yes, I realize I bumped it myself, but ffs, could you be more wrong?
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.03 13:53:00
|
37. What are Devs/GMs thoughts about player-base and forum posters in general - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It is likely a mix of feeling that a vast swath of us are completely off our rockers and make the most ridiculously absurd demands they've ever seen, to a mix of healthy respect for the fact that we ARE the subscribers, so keeping as many of as po...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.10.01 15:56:00
|
38. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Hammond II wrote: Dont you mean everyone in the game? Glad I took my friends' advice an made Mendolus a red bar that says "view post" if that quote was his reply lol I like his argument style though, "MT isnt bad but Im against it" ju...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.09.30 17:51:00
|
39. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Richard Hammond II wrote: lol its the professional apologist... once pro RMT now pro botting... love the anti-botter hate, then the "im as much anti bot as anyone" lol pick one dude an stick with it. Stop trying to play both sides against the ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.09.30 17:38:00
|
40. Goons "legalising" botting!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: I do however, have huge reservations about CCP banning players based on suspicion alone. Yes, that was more of what I was getting at with that post, a lot of the anti-bot guys in this thread seem to think we should ...
- by Mendolus - at 2011.09.30 17:23:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |