Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
1. Sticky:[Hyperion] Heavy Assault Cruiser tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Corey Lean wrote: captain foivos wrote: I mean, clearly, Fozzie and friends have missed the memo: it ain't just the Ishtar. It's sentry drones. Somebody over there coined the phrase: drones as a primary weapon system and they keep doubling...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.07.30 03:21:00
|
2. Sticky:[Hyperion] Heavy Assault Cruiser tweaks - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Aw the Ishtar can only hit out to 170km instead of 180km with drones. It will only go 2700 instead of 2800m/s. What big nurfs. Still no Interceptor nerf? Does CCP even play EVE?
- by IrJosy - at 2014.07.30 03:20:00
|
3. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Milton Middleson wrote: Quote: If these things cost 200mil and make 100mil an hour, all I have to do is run one for two hours and it's payed for itself. Why bother defending it after that point? In theory, because you'd save money on not ...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.17 10:35:00
|
4. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
ShahFluffers wrote: Do understand that... - few people would set these things up in areas prone to hostile incursions. They would be deep in 0.0 alliance territory running 24/7 - if people do set these up in "hostile areas" it is because they ...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 23:08:00
|
5. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: With everyone being able to use this and passively collect ore it means that there will be a massive increase in ore/mineral supply, less ore/mineral demand (because again, everyone can do it!) th...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 21:43:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Milton Middleson wrote: IrJosy wrote: Milton Middleson wrote: Jesus. Trying using something other than gate camps to deal with interceptors. "Can't be caught by gatecamps" is not equivalent to "can't be caught". If you can't catch them...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 21:16:00
|
7. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dolorous Tremmens wrote: Would Rats agress such a deployable, and require routine patrols to clear them out? Instant pvp right there, just need to do a bit of stalking Rats would make things challenging for the solo person who wants to sit ...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:52:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: I don't insist a person PvE'ing attempt to engage us in PvE fit ships either. What I want to see is raid-able farms and fields where you get benefits for harvesting but only if you defend it from others harvesting it f...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:48:00
|
9. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Igor Nappi wrote: So you are basically suggesting a mechanism for highish AFK income that would be more or less invulnerable to harassment and easily defendable by the blob (due to timer) in deep bluesec? It's not afk. You have to haul stu...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:40:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Milton Middleson wrote: Jesus. Trying using something other than gate camps to deal with interceptors. "Can't be caught by gatecamps" is not equivalent to "can't be caught". If you can't catch them on a gate with plenty of time to prepare an...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:35:00
|
11. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Manssell wrote: IrJosy wrote: Omanth Bathana wrote: Manssell wrote: Ceptors are not invincible or uncatchalbe. They just take different tactics to defend against. It has been shown multiple times in this thread that properly fit ...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:33:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Omanth Bathana wrote: Manssell wrote: Ceptors are not invincible or uncatchalbe. They just take different tactics to defend against. It has been shown multiple times in this thread that properly fit interceptors are literally uncatchab...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:26:00
|
13. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Dolorous Tremmens wrote: I like an auto mining bot that lets me mine a lot less and make a lot more, and have decent reasons to shoot people. Only problem (for ccp) is it means less accounts are needed for more mining. Limit them to one per ...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:18:00
|
14. [Idea] "Farms and Fields" - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Stolen from my post in the ESS thread: If there were deploy-able structures mining asteroids, moons, ice, or planets. What we have is a target for a gang to attack and an objective for the local inhabitants to defend. We can call these structure...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 20:04:00
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Muffet McStrudel wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: Interceptors are hardly invincible. And for the record, I have been and still am VERY opposed to interceptors enjoying interdiction nullification. I vocally proclaimed this was a bad move, b...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 18:59:00
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Gizznitt Malikite wrote: IrJosy wrote: Weaselior wrote: greiton starfire wrote: why do these small gangs think they should pose a serious non-ignorable threat to groups over 5000X their size. there's a difference between the people w...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 18:55:00
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Innominate wrote: [quote=Gizznitt Malikite] As a side note, the idea of roaming fleets looking for fights is basically mythological, the ones that are looking for fights sit near a hostile capital and get fights. The ones looking to terrorize r...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 18:50:00
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Weaselior wrote: greiton starfire wrote: why do these small gangs think they should pose a serious non-ignorable threat to groups over 5000X their size. there's a difference between the people who think they should be able to affect sov th...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 18:23:00
|
19. Sticky:[Rubicon 1.1] Interceptor Agility Tweak - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Now if you can just make it so ceptors are no loinger interdiction nullified they will be great! When a dev(rise) says that the best way to deal with inty gangs is to "ignore them and pray that they go away" you know they are broken.
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 18:18:00
|
20. Sticky:Dev blog: More Deployables from Super Friends - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP SoniClover wrote: Weaselior wrote: CCP SoniClover wrote: Because the ISK coming into the game from Null Sec bounties every day is insane and we want to minimize inflation. Your own economist says otherwise. Quote: The next g...
- by IrJosy - at 2014.01.16 17:42:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |