Pages: [1] 2 |
1. CCP - I have a really cool idea to fix factional industrial ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Pahrdi wrote: Marcus Binchiette wrote: ShahFluffers wrote: Marcus Binchiette wrote: Mara Pahrdi wrote: Does it restrict you in your choices? Yes, it does. Well, that actually is a good thing. Decisions should matter. Yes ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2016.11.26 10:27:16
|
2. High sec pirates and mission runners, be aware of this tactic. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nerf Burger wrote: Malcanis wrote: Victoria Sin wrote: Malcanis wrote: Nerf Burger wrote: "Please note that the possibility of losing mission items through theft, damage, sale, or other means is considered an inherent risk in accept...
- by Felsusguy - at 2014.01.02 18:09:00
|
3. Hate the Avatar above you - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Don't look so sad. You didn't really die when your pod exploded.
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.05.25 21:07:00
|
4. Kill rights vs. -10.0 high sec suiciders = Nonsense - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It would be interesting if CONCORD responded faster to crimes the lower your security status is, but anything more is gamebreaking (perhaps even faster response times is).
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.05.03 22:47:00
|
5. Please never add the T3 mining ship - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: Felsusguy wrote: Dave Stark wrote: the aim of combat as an activity is to do that, not the aim of the ship A large portion of combat-based ships in EVE are indeed intended to blow the other ship up directly. unlike ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.05.02 08:18:00
|
6. Quick way to our hearts: new pirate ships, please? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Pkingmaster6 wrote: Vega Umbranox wrote: sounds like a cool idea id love to see pirate destroyers and battlecruisers. hell.. pirate drones even? OH no no no no No! pirate drones not good idea because capitals with sansha fighter bombers d...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.04.29 21:01:00
|
7. Please never add the T3 mining ship - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: the aim of combat as an activity is to do that, not the aim of the ship A large portion of combat-based ships in EVE are indeed intended to blow the other ship up directly.
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.04.28 19:10:00
|
8. Please never add the T3 mining ship - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Dave Stark wrote: you mean 6 ships for 1 job isn't already enough? (7 if you count the venture) Over a hundred ships for one job: combat. I broke your logic. Dave Stark wrote: i won't deny there are parallels but none that allow you to...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.04.28 12:47:00
|
9. The Importance of Industry - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Bi-Mi Lansatha wrote: Felsusguy wrote: Unforgiven Storm - "...Nullsec Industry needs to be revamped, it needs to become better than High Sec..." From your link. My question: why? Because this is just another "...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.03.28 08:50:00
|
10. The Importance of Industry - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rebecha Pucontis wrote: Felsusguy wrote: Planetary Interaction - Risk free ISK for everyone. No effort beyond initial preparation. Moon Mining - Nearly risk free ISK for the big power blocs. Little effort beyond initial preparation and...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.03.27 02:44:00
|
11. The Importance of Industry - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ElQuirko wrote: Felsusguy wrote: POS System - Too many problems to list. Pitiful wormhole industry and frustrating mechanics . Felsusguy wrote: Moon Mining - Nearly risk free ISK for the big power blocs. Little effort ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.03.26 22:42:00
|
12. The Importance of Industry - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Industry. It's not for everyone. And for that reason, only a few realize how broken it really is. It's important to emphasize that industry is important and thus requires a great deal of attention to make sure it works. This attention has not been...
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.03.26 22:14:00
|
13. Sticky:Chat channel issues tonight - possible solution - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Does not work for me. Restarted the client, and nothing. Doesn't fix a thing. Still can't talk to anyone. I am disappointed, CCP.
- by Felsusguy - at 2013.01.09 07:41:00
|
14. The HR Gap: Solving The "Trust" Problem - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I don't mind the screening, but Employment History is bad enough just existing. Having every corporation you have ever joined being able to say nasty things about you directly to anyone looking at your Employment History is worse.
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.12.31 07:59:00
|
15. CCP should refund Hulk training points - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Bunnie Hop wrote: Alavaria Fera wrote: This is... a hulkageddon whine thread, right? Hardly a whine, buzz off drone. "Buzz off"? "Drone"? For one, no one should speak like that. Just because. Secondly, refunding skillpoints for a comple...
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.06.01 07:48:00
|
16. Next forum update should include ability to block an entire corp and/or alliance. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marlona Sky wrote: Felsusguy wrote: The fact you would block anyone on the forums is sort of... questionable. I mean, forums are for group talking. Conversations could quickly become confusing. The fact you want to block an entire corporatio...
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.05.13 03:15:00
|
17. Next forum update should include ability to block an entire corp and/or alliance. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The fact you would block anyone on the forums is sort of... questionable. I mean, forums are for group talking. Conversations could quickly become confusing. The fact you want to block an entire corporations and alliances? That's ridiculous. Even ...
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.05.13 02:30:00
|
18. No more learning implants! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote: We should also get rid of T2 ships as it makes fewer people want to pvp in them U mad bro? Tech 2 ships are easy to leave and board onto a different ship. A little bit different with implants. They also inc...
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.05.08 22:08:00
|
19. KAI86 and his FAILSQUAD - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
From one troll to another, I would like to congratulate you on your completion of the internet. Well done. You have won the internet. Your reward is to have sex with the king of the internet, which is, as of now, you. Enjoy.
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.05.06 10:03:00
|
20. T3 Destroyers in Inferno?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jayrendo Karr wrote: I despide Tech 3 cruisers and what they stand for. The tengu/loki/proteus all need nerfs, tbh the Legion is what tech 3's should be. Adaptable to an extent but against a ship fit for the same role it should be subpar. Let...
- by Felsusguy - at 2012.05.04 02:39:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |