Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
21. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Mothercare Reading tons of player comments on how weak and poorly a carrier can fends it self it seams I am better of figthing in a Velator or Ibis. Why on earth did all carrier pilots even spend all that time and isk into ...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.30 15:49:00
|
22. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: bulabuba Originally by: Druadan If you go up against a carrier without damps that is your fault, not the carrier's strength. One module type that can render the ship incapable in combat. Well, yeah, if you go u...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.30 03:14:00
|
23. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: bulabuba It's funny how this particular nerf is getting all the attention. I (not this character, I the person) spent a lot of time training e-war ships and support skills just to see them get nerfed into near uselessness, y...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.29 19:43:00
|
24. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 28/10/2007 01:31:43 Some mod called Jacques removed my damn Carriers Motherships '07 sig. What the **** is this ****? [center] [orange]Screw you, Jacques.[/or
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.28 01:32:00
|
25. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
New carrier nerf , conceptually even worse than the fighter idiocy. Game dev thread on the subject.
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.27 14:31:00
|
26. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 26/10/2007 16:05:18 Originally by: CCP Abathur Edited by: CCP Abathur on 24/10/2007 14:51:23 Originally by: Druadan I love the idea of being able to beef up one aspect of my carrier, while letting anot...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.26 16:05:00
|
27. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
I'm encouraged by this new take on the carrier nerf. Specialisation is exactly the way to fix the master-of-all-trades status of carriers. It's a status I don't actually believe the carrier has. Its capital tank buckles under focused capital firep...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.24 14:14:00
|
28. New Dev Blog, Nozh on Carriers Redux, Part II - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Crovan If the discussion has now shifted to forcing the carrier pilots to make choices with regard to what they will be specializing in, then those areas need individual boosts. Damage: As is, a carrier's DPS isn't much mo...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.24 01:36:00
|
29. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 24/10/2007 01:13:25 Originally by: Icome4u My accounts are staying canceled until i see something satisfactory. You guys should do the same. Indeed. This devblog is not an apology for the stupid idea, and it is ...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.24 01:12:00
|
30. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: lofty29 Yknow. I've never been angry at a change CCP made. They nerfed NOS, one of my primary weapons. I saw the reasons, so I adapted and kept playing. Before that, they nerfed launching 15 drones from a droneboat, I saw th...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 20:04:00
|
31. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Cyan Nuevo I hope all of you threatening to cancel your accounts actually do. I am totally disgusted to even be associated with this "community" right now. Grow up? Pot. Kettle. Black. You've been posting **** all through...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 18:54:00
|
32. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Reptzo so, all you guys canceling, um, CAN I HAVE YOUR STUFF???? i mean, seriously, you wont be needing it please? Get bent. My stuff will go to my corp, not pithy little 'Kings of Comedy' who have nothing constructive t...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 18:21:00
|
33. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 23/10/2007 18:16:41 What the **** is this ****? CCP you are a bunch of lying scumbags. Take a long walk off a short pier. You are despicable fools of the highest calibre, and I am ashamed to say that I sold this game to ...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 18:16:00
|
34. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Zulupark Originally by: Yaay Edited by: Yaay on 23/10/2007 15:54:47 Edited by: Yaay on 23/10/2007 15:53:15 I'm very glad while the Devs don't want to address this issue in any manner, they don't mind goin...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 16:42:00
|
35. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 23/10/2007 11:15:40 78 pages and what do we get? A thread trying to find out what bribery we'll accept so they can push this change through. Unacceptable.
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 11:16:00
|
36. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Cyan Nuevo You are also stuck in the mindset that more capitals = victory. This is the principle that CCP is trying to break. (Do you honestly prefer more capitals = victory to more skill = victory?) In fleet battles, it...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.23 10:18:00
|
37. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 22/10/2007 18:32:05 Originally by: CCP Eris Discordia Verone gets a cookie Also it would help if people could try to look passed their own bias when they reply with constructive criticism. Takk PS for the ri...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.22 18:31:00
|
38. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 22/10/2007 01:34:06 39 pages of objections to this ridiculous idea, and what have we got? A ''we'll consider your concerns''. I must admit, that's more than we got in the dozens of pages over TWO THREADS when capital pilo...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.22 01:31:00
|
39. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Originally by: Sentinel Eeex Hmm. I could only understand this change if CCP is pre-emptively making modifications for something that is coming in a year or two - 300 people in LOCAL, 250 of them in carriers. If that was the case, I'd und...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.21 15:31:00
|
40. Supercaps, Caps, Drones and Fighters, a New Zulupark Blog - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Druadan on 21/10/2007 15:28:46 1. Do you like this idea (that is the more-support-oriented idea)? No. Carriers ARE support. CCP's whole impression of carriers is that they don't carry ****, they come in with lolreps, get dampened,...
- by Druadan - at 2007.10.21 15:28:00
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |