Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. California - S.F. Bay Area - South Bay - Meet - in Events and Gatherings Archive [original thread]
Hey bud, long time no see! I'd probably be able to make this one, count me in.
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.08.14 06:21:00
|
2. A closer look at Empyrean's changes to the Stabber Fleet Issue - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
WTB fleet stabber @ 1/3rd muninn price. I'll take as much as there are stocks:D
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.06.02 09:29:00
|
3. A closer look at Empyrean's changes to the Stabber Fleet Issue - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The velocity bonus didn't really get removed, but it became a built-in bonus. Also, regarding armor tanking vs. shield tanking.... Although stababond setup sacrifice two mid for a tank, it's still got more buffer than 800mm plate tank;/
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.06.01 21:53:00
|
4. T2 version of tier 3 battleships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
EVE doesn't need anymore features until the problems at hand are fixed, and there are TONS of problem that need fixing/balancing.
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.30 04:14:00
|
5. T1 Battlecruiser make related T1 Cruisers pointless -- HP overload - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Every BC (tier 1 or 2) can be fitted with very economical fit (no poly and stuff like that) to match rup/rax/omen/maller/caracal/moa with maybe a difference in ship cost and slightly longer lock time. 30mm~50mm scan resolution difference is not v...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.27 19:07:00
|
6. Nub Ship AF - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
CCP's made several statements that they do know AF need work and will be worked on in the near future. Reads: AF will remain sh t for next two years. Thanks for your time.
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.17 00:01:00
|
7. Make T1 Destroyers more PvP able. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I'd think a slight reduction in signature radius, and boost in agility would help quite a bit too. Slot layout adjustments are definetly in need, but that wouldn't make this class too much better in term of survivability. (Destroyers' main weakne...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.14 23:31:00
|
8. Gallente Boost? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: BugxEarl on 12/05/2008 20:58:08 I believe Arazu/Lachesis ship bonuses need to be overhauled. How much extra(useful) damages do these ship get from the useless hybrid/missile DPS bonuses exactly? These ships are dedicated RSD/tackle...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.12 20:57:00
|
9. Dictor speeds nerfed across the board - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Andreya stuff I'm not saying dictors are balanced as is, which is why I suggested a slight speed boost. The thing is, if you universally un-nerf interdictors, sabre would still be imbalanced. As is, sabre with 2 poly, 2...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.03 19:53:00
|
10. Dictor speeds nerfed across the board - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eris/Heretic/Sabre are still 'fast enough' to avoid heavy missiles by breaking the 4km/s. This is still less than some of the cheaply fitted nano-cruisers, but I guess it is within acceptable boundries. The real short end of the stick is the flyc...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.05.02 00:19:00
|
11. Nano Fix, only 1 of each speed mod allowed -Easy- - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
First of all, the 'nano-problem' is not really a problem by itself, but it is a solution presented by more basic problem involving current EVE pvp mechanism. That problem is this; Ship classes smaller than battleships have three main ways of figh...
- by BugxEarl - at 2008.04.10 09:14:00
|
12. The MESS up that is DICTOR NERF - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Only people complaining are people flying sabre? Hello? I fly a flycatcher and this stupid thing goes slower than a freaking tech1 cruiser. A TECH1 CRUISER. The iron law of EVE PvP is, if the ship cannot tank the raw DPS, it must either be able t...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.12.06 22:51:00
|
13. Stop Nerfing Group Tackling - Leave Dictors alone - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
I don't understand where you fail to read my argument. What I said was, if the speed of pimp fitted dictors are indeed a problem, fix the fit and not the ship. Nanofagging dictors are nearly everyone. Nanofagging vagas are nearly immune to everyo...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.12.03 17:30:00
|
14. Stop Nerfing Group Tackling - Leave Dictors alone - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
First of all, Sabre going 10km/s with standard fit is a god damned MYTH . With standard t2 fit with cheaper hardwirings, majority of the dictors barely scratch 6km/s as is. Anyone spending 2bil+ in implants deserve 10km/s and if that's imbalanced...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.12.03 12:35:00
|
15. new Stabber model beyond ugly - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
/signed. Save the vaga
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.28 13:46:00
|
16. New models on Sisi! - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Save the vaga! and Lachesis/Arazu. They looks like crap. I mean literally. It looks like a really fresh one. My god!
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.27 19:55:00
|
17. Curse and Pilgrim drone bays - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Curse is fine. Pilgrim most definetly is NOT fine. Go read various other fix pilgrim thread if you don't have any idea why it is not fine. Giving it a bigger drone bandwidth doesn't really solve the problem either, though.
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.27 19:50:00
|
18. Hawk = broken - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hawk doesn't even serve a remotely useful role as an anti-tackler support platform either. Hawk's damage with max skill with no BCU: Bloodclaw: 61dps w/ 1 BCUII Bloodclaw: 75dps --- Since a Hawk can't really fit MSEII w/ MWD and Standard II, the ...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.26 05:23:00
|
19. Scripts more nerfed than people realize - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There are couple of factors that define the effectiveness of fleet fitted BS, but locking speed, locking range as well as weapon range are definetly pretty important. With TC and SB nerf, Megathron would still be effective as current TQ version, ...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.19 12:09:00
|
20. X-large shield extender - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
And 1600mm plate fitted BCs make an utterly unbelievable...piece of brick. Armor plates have double penalties when they are equipped. They make the ship less agile(1) and slower(2). Same stats that influence two characteristics. Shield extenders...
- by BugxEarl - at 2007.11.14 23:47:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |