Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sobaan Tali wrote: So is there any way for those of us not part of the focus group to see what's being decided? I've been looking at some gdocs linked on an earlier page, but keep hearing new changes not shown on them. Try the link to the FG...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.07.02 05:10:22
|
2. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Blazemonger wrote: One of the suggestions seen here that I miss in the discussion on the FC is the option to allow T3C to refit without the need for a Mobile depot. Making them able to refit on their own would give ...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.30 10:43:10
|
3. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
noone kun wrote: i saw "subsystem bay" on tech 3 cruisers on singularity. it could be great to make it "fitting bay" and add role bonus to in-space refitting without mobile depot This has been suggested/brought up several times by a number o...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.29 11:48:31
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Reading the focus group logs there's definitely some changes still being made, good to see some of the more concerning issues being discussed and addressed (from what it seems). Still not entirely happy about the need to refit in space between tra...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.28 09:23:58
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Secretariot Eto wrote: T3Cs are receiving a long awaited nerf. I think we all need to get over that fact and realize they won't have the best damage/tank/ewar/agility combined anymore. Btw, they still deal a ridiculous amount of damage for c...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.27 07:12:43
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
If it was up to me: 1. Offensive Weapons ECM / ewar Covert OPS 2. Defensive Tank ECCM Remote rep 3. Core Probe and Hack PG/CPU [have to think of this one] 4. Propulsion Nullification Speed subwarp and agility Warpspeed But the table has been...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.25 18:51:43
|
7. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
dragonlord00420 wrote: sorry if this question has been an asked and answered already but looking on test server i seen the enginering subsystem has been removed will we get the sp back from training those skills check your free SP on SiSi to...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.25 04:49:57
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Alderson Point wrote: If CCP wish, as I believe T3s to have the opportunity to continue as a Viable exploration ship, in the manner we can currently utilize them,even though refitting may now be needed, the solution in this case would be to m...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.21 10:14:34
|
9. Announcement:June release - Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Matthias Ancaladron wrote: Two things 1. I'm only getting 1 Plex in the rogue drone sites. Marketing dude.. the idea here is that you end up with a handful and then spend $ to be able to use them. And while a lot of us will go 'Nah.. just s...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.15 12:52:16
|
10. Announcement:June release - Issues - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Lebowski wrote: [quote=Miiikka] Out of curiosity and to potentially help the case for future iteration, whats your use case for removing this column? Not everyone runs 4K screens would be good.. In general it appears CCP designs and thi...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.15 12:48:43
|
11. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Flying a BS only to have it crippled into a brick in space by a single ECM boat sitting 100KM out is what one of the biggest problems right now revolves around. CCP won't have he balls to nerf ECM though..
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.12 09:23:08
|
12. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
The current string of nerfs and 'balancing' is obviously mostly geared towards CCP's bottom line. Seeing the articles which have been posted in several financial publications recently it's reasonable to assume a drive to increase net worth to be a...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.09 10:34:37
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: God, where to start? Neither covert cloak nor nullification is required for exploration. The reason for choosing aT3C is that it offers the option. If I am forced to refit in space I am at a considerable disadvantage a...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.09 08:42:53
|
14. Sticky:[Summer] Pirate Battleship Cost Intervention - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
So much for EVE being a player driven economy.. CCP makes changes, sees they do not have the desired effect (to them) later on and then nerfs things to fall in line with what they want to see.. What is going to happen is traders will start stockp...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.09 08:01:59
|
15. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mustache Dealer wrote: - Add a subsystem/rig only bay to T3s. This.. CCPlease.. Oh, and allow T3C to refit from this bay without the need for Mobile Depot.. That by itself would give these ships so much more versatility. If as a balance y...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.04 23:39:44
|
16. Sticky:Dev blog: The future of probe and directional scanning UI - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Commenting on these changes is pointless. CCP does not care, the devlopers have moved on to new things and they have are leaving this broken and unintuitive design and implementation as is as CCP is not interested in anything but push the ganking ...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.06.04 10:00:46
|
17. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Pi Prophet wrote: One solo pilot said he enjoys flying though gatecamps unharmed. Maybe there should be a cloaky nullified exploration ship. Just make it a frigate that can't fit cynos. Why should a cruiser fill the role of a scout in the first...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.05.31 12:40:50
|
18. Sticky:Dev blog: Strategic Cruisers and You - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Harvey James wrote: I hate these exclusive little Focus groups that just excludes everyone else.. isn't there already a csm for that? removable rigs ... at 60 mil a pop for a set of T2 rigs.. does that really encourage versatility? T3's need s...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.05.29 12:13:10
|
19. Announcement:119.5 - General Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
DovHammer wrote: Why ingame plex still 30 days(?) With the new Plex system you need 500 of them to play 30 days - well that's fair enough. But - if I only can play (say) one week, why not be able to pay in ingame plex for a week(?) /DovHamme...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.05.10 17:49:50
|
20. Announcement:119.5 - General Feedback - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dumbing down 'advanced audio settings' is just silly and a sign of not understanding your own product, it's features and your users. In fact audio needs much more flexibility IMO, starting with changing this back and allowing to select where sound...
- by Blazemonger - at 2017.05.09 15:22:56
|
Pages: [1] |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |