EVE Search - Posts by Avon

Search EVE-Online forums for:

Result 1-20 of 11356 for by author Avon (1,16 seconds)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500
1. R.I.P. V R - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Just resubbed to pay my respects. Sad news. - by Avon - at 2012.09.15 01:55:00
2. JumpClone cooldown to 12 Hours! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Lord Zim wrote: I love this talk about force projection, it's like there isn't an alternative that takes 2 minutes pr use, 3 if your fat fingers can't update the clone and set a new station quickly enough. Doing it the "old way" with medical... - by Avon - at 2011.12.11 18:53:00
3. JumpClone cooldown to 12 Hours! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The jump clone timer should be removed by removing jump clones. Problem solved. It was a stupid idea in the first place. - by Avon - at 2011.12.11 17:13:00
4. Suicide Ganking: coming to an end? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The same insurance mechanic should apply no matter how a ship is lost. That isn't a complaint; I for one look forward to the removal of insurance all together. - by Avon - at 2011.11.06 02:58:00
5. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Andski wrote: I'd argue that fitting a BS properly comes at a greater cost than fitting a BC (large rigs are more expensive, large guns are more expensive, etc.) As insurance doesn't cover fitting it is rather a moot point, but one that I ... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:40:00
6. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Morganta wrote: Avon wrote: Morganta wrote: but guess what, its small cheap ships, nobody is going to win or lose EVE paying to burn a destroyer without insurance, so really theres no value from removing the valid isk sink that the insur... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:30:00
7. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Avon wrote: There is no need to incentivise ship destruction, it's gonna happen 'cause haters gonna hate. GÇªbut not at a sustainable rate. Even with the current incentive scheme, too few ships are getting blown up. The idea o... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:28:00
8. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ladie Harlot wrote: The Apostle wrote: And since maths is your strongpoint, there is a high likelihood that 1% of mission ships were killed by ganks and 99% of minign vessels were killed by ganks - that's the bit we're actually comparing....... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:17:00
9. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Morganta wrote: but guess what, its small cheap ships, nobody is going to win or lose EVE paying to burn a destroyer without insurance, so really theres no value from removing the valid isk sink that the insurance mechanic is at the larger shi... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:11:00
10. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The Apostle wrote: Nice. The hypothesis is quite clever. And since maths is your strongpoint, there is a high likelihood that 1% of mission ships were killed by ganks and 99% of minign vessels were killed by ganks - that's the bit we're actu... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:08:00
11. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The Apostle wrote: Miners are expected to stfu if ganked but a mission runner says "please don't touch the mechanic" knowing full well that the likelihood of a successful gank against a mission vessel VERSUS the likelihood of a Hulk gank is vi... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 03:04:00
12. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Avon wrote: The game giving you ISK upon the destruction of your ship is a reward for that loss. It may be less than your expenditure, but the game is still rewarding loss. Seeing as how you're better off not losing that ship ... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 02:58:00
13. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The Apostle wrote: Tippia wrote: You asked for stats, and you were given the ones that are available to us players. If you don't like it, go get your own and prove those wrong. In fact, do that regardless, because the onus is on you to pro... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 02:54:00
14. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Avon wrote: I don't agree - losing a ship should not be rewarded, but by all means also reduce NPC bounties. It's not being rewarded GÇö it's being mitigated. Under the old system (with the help of clueless miners and industr... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 02:47:00
15. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] The Apostle wrote: Avon wrote: Ships gotta go boom Eve depends on it. So you'd be happy to see Concord removed from mission space? Yup. Wouldn't bother me either way in all honesty. - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 02:00:00
16. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] MeestaPenni wrote: Gankers consider ships to be little more than "ammo". The cost of the entire process is precisely known and is an accepted amount for loss. If losses had a possiblity of exceeding the tangible costs, then you could describe ... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 01:58:00
17. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Tippia wrote: Avon wrote: All insurance should be removed. Even playfield remains even and ISK fountain is capped. Win. If that's the issue, a reduction of bounties would be far better: allows for fine-tuning, is less felt hit for those a... - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 01:56:00
18. I don't understand the hate for removing insurance pay outs on Concorded ships. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] All insurance should be removed. Even playfield remains even and ISK fountain is capped. Win. - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 01:49:00
19. Watershed moment? The Apostle shrugged - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Ships gotta go boom Eve depends on it. - by Avon - at 2011.10.30 01:47:00
20. Yeah, that was me. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread] Rodj Blake wrote: Tippia wrote: I just wanted to point out that the British Navy made a suggestion in 1890 about putting battleship-sized guns on cruiser-sized ships. They called them battlecruisersGÇª You'd have had a /thread from me if ... - by Avon - at 2011.10.25 17:23:00
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.