Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Nighthawk faster than CNR in level 4? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Well nighthawk is faster than cruise golem but slower than torp golem. About CNR no idea really but i think it is slower than cruise CNR especially on bs heavy missions, though i would love to see some actuall numbers. Biggest "+" on using NH i...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.30 19:03:00
|
2. Navy Battleship Paintjobs are Imbalanced - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 30/09/2009 11:51:28 Originally by: Freyya How about giving it a white/grey/black Siberian tiger stripe camo if you're (CCP) all really that into camouflaged ships? I think that's one of the few camo paint jobs that...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.30 11:47:00
|
3. Dominion Supercarrier Feedback - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Soleil Fournier Yeah lets start with the name. Mothership -> Fleet Carrier (or Flagship) Carrier -> Escort Carrier Will post on the numbers and experiences once its on sisi! Agree
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.30 11:30:00
|
4. Nighthawk - lvl 4 - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Tau Cabalander So what's the advantage of a Nighthawk in level 4? It looks far better than raven, especially if someone hate the way raven hull looks like
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.29 21:03:00
|
5. Special WCS WH Fit?? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Did you even saw penalities for using those? What you want to do? Hug sleepers to target them? Also how long you want to take to target them? Eternity and some against frigates? 2 WCS also dont help at all against interdictors and heavy interdi...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.29 20:58:00
|
6. Most pointless module ever? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 29/09/2009 20:45:53 Originally by: Dramaticus Originally by: Pottsey autotargeter is far from useless some of my fits have 3 as a must. Shield rechargers is not useless, next to useless mind you but there a...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.29 20:44:00
|
7. Dagan - minimum needed for a solo kill - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 27/09/2009 21:06:14 Done easy in rail enyo so you should be fine in caracal if you get some faction lights Edit: i killed him few times, heh im too nice guy in local
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.27 21:05:00
|
8. Support ship for higher-level missions? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
As some of peoples said 3 toona micro management in pve will be nightmare^2, train it for fleet command ship (for armor tank amarr) and than you could just put more gank on your other toons that do the fighting without loosing tank. No nightmare ...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.27 20:45:00
|
9. New Dev Blog: Dominion - The Capital Battlefield - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 24/09/2009 11:20:40 Super Carrier sound awfull Assault Carrier, Heavy Carrier, Strike Carrier all imho sounds better just not "super" carriers, "super" in it sound like some 4th grade comic book... Imho Heavy Carrier is ...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.24 11:16:00
|
10. Rigs for a Tengu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Xilian Yula Try solo C4 WH and I'm pretty sure you'll change your mind of "overtanking". Reading comprehension isn`t your strong side i see. But if you still think that setup was for WH i think its rather pointless to w...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 19:39:00
|
11. Maelstrom - Mission running - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: BumRusher Im sure you ment gyro¦s instead of BCS in the low slots? Aye <blushes> thats what happen when i post half drunk;)
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 16:49:00
|
12. Rigs for a Tengu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Xilian Yula I reach much higher speed, better DPS, better EM resistance. With the extra speed and EM resistance you can boost your tank heavily. True I will probably do better against frigates with your build, but good thing...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 12:10:00
|
13. Rigs for a Tengu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 11/09/2009 11:54:40 Originally by: Xilian Yula I'd like to know which setup can handle 1730 omni tank. 81% EM, 91.6% Therm, 87.4% Kinetic and 78.9% explosive. Can deal almost 800 DPS with HM reaching 114 KM. 707M/...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 11:48:00
|
14. Rigs for a Tengu - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
It can be cap stable without CCC rigs. All depends on setup, skills and ISKs involved.
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 11:20:00
|
15. Tempest needs changing. - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Tempest? Whats that? Is it tasty? Fried maybe?
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 01:25:00
|
16. Drones - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Salpad I've used Caldari T2 small drones for anti-frigate work so far, but if that's what I'll continue using drones for, I should switch to Minmatar drones? For PvP? Yes For PvE? Pick those that do appropriate dmg to...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 01:20:00
|
17. Curse Paradox - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Iria Ahrens Why two Neuts? Isn't one heavy generally enough? BTW, for my ratting BS, if I stick on a cap injector. How many charges should I carry, considering that I'll also be using my cargo hold for loot. is 10 units of...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 01:04:00
|
18. Maelstrom - Mission running - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Against Angels: [Maelstrom, Little Chainsaw] Republic Fleet Ballistic Control System Republic Fleet Ballistic Control System Republic Fleet Ballistic Control System Republic Fleet Tracking Enhancer Damage Control II Republic Fleet Shield Boost A...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.11 00:37:00
|
19. Curse Paradox - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Edited by: Ardion on 10/09/2009 22:59:04 Originally by: Davinel Lulinvega Ratting ravens are not passive tanked. Cruise missiles barely damage cruisers. Sounds like a good target to me. Not every rattling raven is tasty dish [Rave...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.10 22:56:00
|
20. Black Ops ships - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
They have subpar combat capabilities than t1 bs, they cost insanely more (remember t2 is not really insurable, when you loose 800m in ship+fitting than thats full 800m down the drain). Becouse of price and not so stellar performance they arent us...
- by Ardion - at 2009.09.10 21:39:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |