Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Georgina Eldridge
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 02:07:00 -
[1]
As the subject says: the majority of players fly T1 ships of BS size and smaller - lets have some more variety please. :)
(Areas which specifically need a lot more attention are destroyers and battlecruisers.) |
Efrim Black
Apellon
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 02:08:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Georgina Eldridge As the subject says: the majority of players fly T1 ships of BS size and smaller - lets have some more variety please. :)
(Areas which specifically need a lot more attention are destroyers and battlecruisers.)
I'd like to see 5 more frigates for each race as well. Why not? |
Jin Labarre
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 04:55:00 -
[3]
I would love it, if faction ships got splitted into common and uncommon faction ships. Whenever I fly an Angel mission, I pop dozens of Dramiels. Yet when I want to fly one, I have to pay about 50-60 Million for it? I wonder how the Angel syndicate is able to afford that. Sure, they build them. Yet they could make more money than with crime if they just sold them themselves. Makes no sense.
So why not turn ships like the Dramiel into something slightly better, like an "Archangel Dramiel" with some minor buffs and unique features or as a Tech II version of the Dramiel and at the same time make the basic Dramiel a ship that can be bought and sold on the market for a reasonable price?
I'm only using the Dramiel as an example, of course. And I got one already. Or two. I dunno.
Then there are all the other pirate ships that players cannot even fly at all. Not even as faction ships. Who cares if these ships are crap or the hottest stuff ever? Make them available in one form or another.
The addition of 1-2 extra destroyers per Empire faction would also be cool.
Tech 3 gives big time candy to the big skill and money players. Give something to the lower end of the scale, too.
|
Jettisoned Can
THE INTERNET. Goodfellas.
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 08:36:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Jin Labarre I would love it, if faction ships got splitted into common and uncommon faction ships. Whenever I fly an Angel mission, I pop dozens of Dramiels. Yet when I want to fly one, I have to pay about 50-60 Million for it? I wonder how the Angel syndicate is able to afford that. Sure, they build them. Yet they could make more money than with crime if they just sold them themselves. Makes no sense.
So why not turn ships like the Dramiel into something slightly better, like an "Archangel Dramiel" with some minor buffs and unique features or as a Tech II version of the Dramiel and at the same time make the basic Dramiel a ship that can be bought and sold on the market for a reasonable price?
I'm only using the Dramiel as an example, of course. And I got one already. Or two. I dunno.
Then there are all the other pirate ships that players cannot even fly at all. Not even as faction ships. Who cares if these ships are crap or the hottest stuff ever? Make them available in one form or another.
The addition of 1-2 extra destroyers per Empire faction would also be cool.
Tech 3 gives big time candy to the big skill and money players. Give something to the lower end of the scale, too.
I couldn't agree with you more.
Pirate ships provide a unique set of bonuses you can't get with the standard races and have some of the best looking hulls but a relegated to underpowered (except Sansha) and incredibly expensive faction ships. Besides, what sounds better than a Domination Macherial or Dark Blood Ashimmu?
I'd love to see a Khanid set of T1 ships for Amarr. (except for possibly frigates) There's definitely room for 1 more destroyer per race (though fixing the existing ones should be a higher priority) and 1 more BC per race. One more BS and cruiser couldn't hurt either. _________________________ Did you really not have enough room for me? I'm only 1m¦. |
Dragonwell
Ashen Rain
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 09:53:00 -
[5]
Destroyers are due for their second tier. *** Awake in a Space-Dye Vest Struggling with Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence Falling Into Infinity toward a New Millennium While trapped inside this Octavarium. |
Santiago Fahahrri
Galactic Geographic
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 11:36:00 -
[6]
More ships = good. ~ Santiago Fahahrri Galactic Geographic |
K1RTH G3RS3N
Haunted House BROTHERS GRIM.
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 14:39:00 -
[7]
totally agree eh
t3 is interesting and all that but just sounds like theyll be too costly to use anywhere other then your lvl2 missions.
some variation in the affordable range would be awesome...
and i want my force recon drake damnit!
Recruiting \o/ |
Drake Draconis
Shadow Cadre Worlds End Consortium
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 15:50:00 -
[8]
Eh why not...
/signed =============== CEO of Clan Shadow Cadre www.shadowcadre.com =============== |
Kalia Masaer
Rosa Castellum
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 16:06:00 -
[9]
Destroyers really need another tier or 2 as that is what new players get into quite early on and can be in a long time, another BC wouldn't hurt either.
|
Lee Dalton
Privateers Privateer Alliance
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 16:14:00 -
[10]
Signed - lets have some stuff that really matters to new players.
More little ships please.
|
|
Efrim Black
Gallente Apellon
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 16:45:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Kalia Masaer Destroyers really need another tier or 2 as that is what new players get into quite early on and can be in a long time, another BC wouldn't hurt either.
True, but also, even if you just introduced more frigates, it would add a dynamic to the current system.
|
Jove X
Dragon Highlords
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 18:01:00 -
[12]
How about a third Battlecruiser? I love BC's. In many ways they are the poor mans' BS. There are three BS classes, why not 3 BC classes?
|
Georgina Eldridge
|
Posted - 2009.02.11 18:41:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Jove X How about a third Battlecruiser? I love BC's. In many ways they are the poor mans' BS. There are three BS classes, why not 3 BC classes?
I would really like to have more variety so there isn't just Tier 1, 2, 3 of a ship class (where in general, Tier 3 is the best and only one worth using).
|
Sar Ferredj
Orion Federation
|
Posted - 2009.02.12 10:36:00 -
[14]
1. give destroyers a real use in game 2. moar destroyers 3. 3rd BC indeed 4. mkVI iteron needed
|
Odetta Harpy
|
Posted - 2009.02.12 11:08:00 -
[15]
1.more destroyers 2.more T2 destroyers 3.More T2 frigates with different roles 4.more BC 5.Make the Drake the fighting command ship 6.More T2 BC with different roles
|
Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
|
Posted - 2009.02.12 11:51:00 -
[16]
more t2 frigs awesome more in the dessy line awesome more in the BC line awesome (and fix the friggen eos) ---
Zombie Apocalypse Guitar-Wielding Superteam |
Jaina Proudmoar
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2009.02.13 18:52:00 -
[17]
More destroyers please! :D
(buff them too while you're at it.)
|
Insa Rexion
Minmatar M3T4LH34DZ
|
Posted - 2009.02.23 08:52:00 -
[18]
bloody top idea..../signed
well mannered a**h*** |
Stick Cult
|
Posted - 2009.02.23 11:10:00 -
[19]
T1 mini-freighter?
|
Zolian
|
Posted - 2009.02.23 16:54:00 -
[20]
BCs are my favorite ship class, unfortunately they don't have anything near the variety of say cruisers or battleships.
+1 for more BCs.
Also: faction BCs.
|
|
Sleepindpro
|
Posted - 2009.02.24 16:01:00 -
[21]
I support this more Tech 1 & 2 ships for the following
Destroyers 1-2 more Tech 1 and tech 2 variants Battlecrusiers 1-2 more Tech 1 and tech 2 variants
|
Pattern Clarc
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 13:38:00 -
[22]
____
My Blog Is Awesome
|
Georgina Eldridge
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 15:00:00 -
[23]
Originally by: Pattern Clarc
Yay, CSM support! :D
|
Scagga Laebetrovo
Ammatar Free Corps
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 15:50:00 -
[24]
How about T1 ships that belong to minor factions?
|
Octavio Santillian
Einherjar Rising
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 16:14:00 -
[25]
Personally, IĘd rather see CCP spend time on improving the role balance of current ships. By that I mean improving the usefulness of ships that are rarely flown because they are simply outclassed by a T1 counterpart. IĘd like to see the tier system be supplanted by a role oriented system. Once CCP balances what already exists, they can spend time on making more stuff to balance.
|
Elektrea
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 19:31:00 -
[26]
Edited by: Elektrea on 25/02/2009 19:31:46 the more the better. I always wondered why there are only 3 BS's per race ----------
|
Stalina
Gallente Deep Space Exploration Squad
|
Posted - 2009.02.25 21:18:00 -
[27]
Originally by: Octavio Santillian Personally, IĘd rather see CCP spend time on improving the role balance of current ships. By that I mean improving the usefulness of ships that are rarely flown because they are simply outclassed by a T1 counterpart. IĘd like to see the tier system be supplanted by a role oriented system. Once CCP balances what already exists, they can spend time on making more stuff to balance.
this. _________________________________
|
Imertu Solientai
|
Posted - 2009.02.26 23:37:00 -
[28]
I wouldn't mind seeing another destroyer for each race, but other than that there are plenty of T1 ships already.
|
Georgina Eldridge
|
Posted - 2009.02.27 15:04:00 -
[29]
Originally by: Imertu Solientai I wouldn't mind seeing another destroyer for each race, but other than that there are plenty of T1 ships already.
Except for battlecruisers, right? 2 per race is not a lot.
|
Georgina Eldridge
|
Posted - 2009.02.27 15:04:00 -
[30]
Originally by: Stalina
Originally by: Octavio Santillian Personally, IĘd rather see CCP spend time on improving the role balance of current ships. By that I mean improving the usefulness of ships that are rarely flown because they are simply outclassed by a T1 counterpart. IĘd like to see the tier system be supplanted by a role oriented system. Once CCP balances what already exists, they can spend time on making more stuff to balance.
this.
Off topic - the balance of T2 ships has nothing to do with this. :/
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |