EVE Search - First Multiple Titans

Search EVE-Online forums for:

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

First Multiple Titans

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
AmarrSecSlave Minmatar ILIKEITBIG	Posted - 2008.10.24 11:14:00 - [1] Which alliance will be the first to lose 2+ titans in one battle and which alliance will be the victor of this fight?
Deira Lenia The Chaotic Order Void.	Posted - 2008.10.24 11:18:00 - [2] Either TCF or another random NC bandwagon alliance. The victor? CCP's LAG alliance.
RedSplat Suddenly Ninjas	Posted - 2008.10.24 11:19:00 - [3] BoB, when they acquire Jovian tech.
Rod Blaine Evolution Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.10.24 12:10:00 - [4] Who will lose them ? -Us, 'cause Dian reactivated Who will be the winner ? -Us, 'cause he'll emoragequit right after.
Heptameron Gallente Octavian Vanguard RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.10.24 12:35:00 - [5] Originally by: Deira Lenia Either TCF or another random NC bandwagon alliance. The victor? CCP's LAG alliance. Another tithead who doesn't know what they are talking about.... go check killboards and see who's fighting alongside who and then make a real post.. or go back to stroking yourself wishing you had the nuts to get involved in such an epic campaign.
Deira Lenia The Chaotic Order Void.	Posted - 2008.10.24 12:57:00 - [6] Originally by: Heptameron Originally by: Deira Lenia Either TCF or another random NC bandwagon alliance. The victor? CCP's LAG alliance. Another tithead who doesn't know what they are talking about.... go check killboards and see who's fighting alongside who and then make a real post.. or go back to stroking yourself wishing you had the nuts to get involved in such an epic campaign. I'm seeing RZR, MM, PURE, HYDRA, TCF, KIA, DAISHO, CORE and other various alliances being shot to hell by TRI, BOB, BIONIC DAWN, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Your own killboard says so, BOB's killboard says so, Morsus Mihi's killboard says so, TCF killboard says so, TRI's killboard says so. Hell, even NC pets like Fallout Project killboard says so. And yes. I think of being stuck on the loginscreen for 2 hours untill the node crashes again of a "campain with epic proportions" I cant say that i find the MAX campain effective, but it sure made the northern napmonkeys aggrevated. Been there, Done that, Left before RZR started trolling. -- Real men corpse tank Void Forums The Chaotic Order Forums
Kusotarre Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:06:00 - [7] Originally by: Deira Lenia I'm seeing RZR, MM, PURE, HYDRA, TCF, KIA, DAISHO, CORE and other various alliances being shot to hell by TRI, BOB, BIONIC DAWN, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Your own killboard says so, BOB's killboard says so, Morsus Mihi's killboard says so, TCF killboard says so, TRI's killboard says so. Hell, even NC pets like Fallout Project killboard says so. And yes. I think of being stuck on the loginscreen for 2 hours untill the node crashes again of a "campain with epic proportions" I cant say that i find the MAX campain effective, but it sure made the northern napmonkeys aggrevated. Been there, Done that, Left before RZR started trolling. This is pretty funny. Unlike the GBC, we've been pretty open about the stats for this war. We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. http://northern-coalition.com/ So really, I'm not sure which KB you're looking at, but it's definitely not any that is giving you a comprehensive view of the MAX campaign.
Kusotarre Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:08:00 - [8] Also why does this thread have like 900 views?
Anahid Brutus TunkbwahCorp GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:17:00 - [9] Originally by: Kusotarre Originally by: Deira Lenia I'm seeing RZR, MM, PURE, HYDRA, TCF, KIA, DAISHO, CORE and other various alliances being shot to hell by TRI, BOB, BIONIC DAWN, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Your own killboard says so, BOB's killboard says so, Morsus Mihi's killboard says so, TCF killboard says so, TRI's killboard says so. Hell, even NC pets like Fallout Project killboard says so. And yes. I think of being stuck on the loginscreen for 2 hours untill the node crashes again of a "campain with epic proportions" I cant say that i find the MAX campain effective, but it sure made the northern napmonkeys aggrevated. Been there, Done that, Left before RZR started trolling. This is pretty funny. Unlike the GBC, we've been pretty open about the stats for this war. We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. http://northern-coalition.com/ So really, I'm not sure which KB you're looking at, but it's definitely not any that is giving you a comprehensive view of the MAX campaign. well that's confirmed then, most of bob's fleets really are pets at this point.
Deira Lenia The Chaotic Order Void.	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:18:00 - [10] I was looking at the individual alliance killboards. The "fleet stats" make interesting views of battles which are not always 100% correct, but easyer then going kill by kill to check who shot at it. The one you just linked is new to me, i must say its a nice initiative, would be cool if the GBC threw one up aswell. Thanks for that!

Fire Hawk Federation of Freedom Fighters Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:19:00 - [11] Edited by: Fire Hawk on 24/10/2008 13:25:06 Originally by: Kusotarre Originally by: Deira Lenia I'm seeing RZR, MM, PURE, HYDRA, TCF, KIA, DAISHO, CORE and other various alliances being shot to hell by TRI, BOB, BIONIC DAWN, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Your own killboard says so, BOB's killboard says so, Morsus Mihi's killboard says so, TCF killboard says so, TRI's killboard says so. Hell, even NC pets like Fallout Project killboard says so. And yes. I think of being stuck on the loginscreen for 2 hours untill the node crashes again of a "campain with epic proportions" I cant say that i find the MAX campain effective, but it sure made the northern napmonkeys aggrevated. Been there, Done that, Left before RZR started trolling. This is pretty funny. Unlike the GBC, we've been pretty open about the stats for this war. We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. http://northern-coalition.com/ So really, I'm not sure which KB you're looking at, but it's definitely not any that is giving you a comprehensive view of the MAX campaign. I like the idea of your killboard and was looking forward to have a look at the stats, it is however unfortunate that you fail to post all your losses again. Have a look at your last fleet battle report in E-O and you will see that you are missing a minimum of 51 losses, you have posted 33 losses when the bob Killboard shows 84 kill. It is truly Sad to see a god idea like that being used once again to manipulate stats.
Deira Lenia The Chaotic Order Void.	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:21:00 - [12] Edited by: Deira Lenia on 24/10/2008 13:22:21 Originally by: Fire Hawk Originally by: Kusotarre Originally by: Deira Lenia I'm seeing RZR, MM, PURE, HYDRA, TCF, KIA, DAISHO, CORE and other various alliances being shot to hell by TRI, BOB, BIONIC DAWN, etc etc etc etc etc etc. Your own killboard says so, BOB's killboard says so, Morsus Mihi's killboard says so, TCF killboard says so, TRI's killboard says so. Hell, even NC pets like Fallout Project killboard says so. And yes. I think of being stuck on the loginscreen for 2 hours untill the node crashes again of a "campain with epic proportions" I cant say that i find the MAX campain effective, but it sure made the northern napmonkeys aggrevated. Been there, Done that, Left before RZR started trolling. This is pretty funny. Unlike the GBC, we've been pretty open about the stats for this war. We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. http://northern-coalition.com/ So really, I'm not sure which KB you're looking at, but it's definitely not any that is giving you a comprehensive view of the MAX campaign. I like the idea of your killboard and was looking forward to have a look at the stats, it is however unfortunate that you fail to post all your losses again. Have a look at your last fleet battle report in E-O and you will see that you are missing a minimum of 61 losses, you have posted 33 losses when the bob Killboard shows 84 kill. It is truly Sad to see a god idea like that being used once again to manipulate stats. Stop beating me to sling more numptyness at the NC numptys! Also, ur sig still says DICE french wing! FakeEdit: Must be the alliances without the big numbers that aint synced into the KB yet. Oh, and to the Goonie, You mean GOONS fielded the majority of people to siege NOL with? Dont make me laugh, it hurts.
Fire Hawk Federation of Freedom Fighters Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:35:00 - [13] Edited by: Fire Hawk on 24/10/2008 13:35:22 If those alliance represent at least 60% of their losses, why shouldnt they be on the NC killboard? Futhermore i had a look at another fleet battle which took place in 15w on the 22 of this month. The NC board shows no losses taken and an efficiency of 100%, while the bob killboard shows that the NC lost a very minimun of 19 ships. The point i am trying to make is, the NC should stop claimning they are saints
Deira Lenia The Chaotic Order Void.	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:46:00 - [14] Mwah, their not saying their saints. Look at Fred0, he wanted to know all possible exploits, haxes and lagkickers he could find! Loss wise you could say the same about BOB, most of the the time GBC losses dont end up on the BOB killboard (which is obvious BOB aint the GBC, just like RZR aint the NC). Although i found that GBC losses are more accurate, even if you have to stroll past 10+ KB's to find them all.
Dianabolic Reikoku Band of Brothers	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:52:00 - [15] Originally by: Rod Blaine Who will lose them ? -Us, 'cause Dian reactivated Who will be the winner ? -Us, 'cause he'll emoragequit right after. Love you too, Rodney! Reikoku Diplomatic Forums
Xiong Yoshi Quantum Industries RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:53:00 - [16] Originally by: Fire Hawk Edited by: Fire Hawk on 24/10/2008 13:35:22 If those alliance represent at least 60% of their losses, why shouldnt they be on the NC killboard? Futhermore i had a look at another fleet battle which took place in 15w on the 22 of this month. The NC board shows no losses taken and an efficiency of 100%, while the bob killboard shows that the NC lost a very minimun of 19 ships. The point i am trying to make is, the NC should stop claimning they are saints If you see a KM that you feel should be posted to improve accuracy - atleast give more information than "15w on the 22nd" cause there were quite a few ships killed/lost on that day in that system. Atleast say a pilot's name and shiptype.. maybe approximate time would help. Or just link to the kill even though Mods will probably scrub the link. ------------------------------------------------ There are only two types of ships: those which have blown up; and those which will.
Fire Hawk Federation of Freedom Fighters Executive Outcomes	Posted - 2008.10.24 13:53:00 - [17] Originally by: Deira Lenia Mwah, their not saying their saints. Look at Fred0, he wanted to know all possible exploits, haxes and lagkickers he could find! Loss wise you could say the same about BOB, most of the the time GBC losses dont end up on the BOB killboard (which is obvious BOB aint the GBC, just like RZR aint the NC). Although i found that GBC losses are more accurate, even if you have to stroll past 10+ KB's to find them all. We never claimed to be, as fart as posting losses i can not talk about the other menbers of the GBC, but as far as the EXE is concerned I will be happily to pay the NC 10 Million isk per lost mail not posted after 48 hours after the occured lost. I of course would welcome the same initiative from the NC. ___ Fear the french touch.
An Anarchyyt Gallente Battlestars GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.10.24 14:09:00 - [18] Void. sounds like such a powerful and mighty alliance. It is a wonder why you have no idea what's going on. Originally by: CCP Wrangler Second, a gentile is a non jewish person
Sasha Lyre Gallente Blood Music	Posted - 2008.10.24 14:09:00 - [19] Originally by: Fire Hawk Originally by: Deira Lenia Mwah, their not saying their saints. Look at Fred0, he wanted to know all possible exploits, haxes and lagkickers he could find! Loss wise you could say the same about BOB, most of the the time GBC losses dont end up on the BOB killboard (which is obvious BOB aint the GBC, just like RZR aint the NC). Although i found that GBC losses are more accurate, even if you have to stroll past 10+ KB's to find them all. We never claimed to be, as fart as posting losses i can not talk about the other menbers of the GBC, but as far as the EXE is concerned I will be happily to pay the NC 10 Million isk per lost mail not posted after 48 hours after the occured lost. I of course would welcome the same initiative from the NC. When I grow up I wanna be good enough to join your clan.. Your Blood Goes to my Head and the Music Flows through my Veins
Darklin Eldaris The Illuminati.	Posted - 2008.10.24 14:12:00 - [20] Edited by: Darklin Eldaris on 24/10/2008 14:16:25 Originally by: Kusotarre We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. Error in logic detected. If you went to the trouble to creating the killboard which aggregates all information across the entire conflict for your side then there is no need for BOB to make one too. The information is already there on your killboard, why make two of them? That said lets not make this post all about killboards, considering the OP posed a question ( which is at least sort of interesting to ponder ). If I went with statistical analysis I'd have to say the first to lose 2 in 1 battle would be BOB, because they have so damn many of them. To be honest, killboards don't matter. At all. Not even a little bit. What matters is who has the sov, who has the resources, who keeps showing up day after day after day. That wins wars, not k:d ratios. It's been said time and again, and it will be said till this game goes belly up ( truth withstands the test of time ).

Fred0 Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance	Posted - 2008.10.24 14:34:00 - [21] Originally by: Darklin Eldaris Originally by: Kusotarre We've made a killboard that aggregates the info from most of the NC (not sure who, if any, are missing, but they don't include the largest players for sure). GBC hasn't done this. Error in logic detected. If you went to the trouble to creating the killboard which aggregates all information across the entire conflict for your side then there is no need for BOB to make one too. The information is already there on your killboard, why make two of them? The error is really yours. You shouldn't confuse "most" with "all" and then apply your logic to "all" since Kuso didn't say that. Logic is all good but worthless if it stands on distorted thruths. Besides, Kuso's point was probably that we're making an effort at showing a correct KB picture of our fights while the GBC doesn't. You can draw whatever conclusions you want from that --- "Cutting Edge 4 Life"
Sinder Ohm Demonic Corp G00DFELLAS	Posted - 2008.10.24 15:04:00 - [22] Originally by: Rod Blaine Who will lose them ? -Us, 'cause Dian reactivated Who will be the winner ? -Us, 'cause he'll emoragequit right after. by far the coolest answer in this thread all the others suck.
titanstory Section XIII Tau Ceti Federation	Posted - 2008.10.24 15:27:00 - [23] Originally by: Deira Lenia Either TCF or another random NC bandwagon alliance. The victor? CCP's LAG alliance. idiot
Irongut M'8'S Frontal Impact	Posted - 2008.10.24 16:03:00 - [24] Originally by: Fred0 Besides, Kuso's point was probably that we're making an effort at showing a correct KB picture of our fights while the GBC doesn't. You can draw whatever conclusions you want from that So you've made an effort to claim that an inaccurate killboard shows a more correct picture of the situation. While the GBC have made no such spurious claims. I draw the conclusion that you must be losing because you feel more need to employ false propaganda.

CCP Navigator C C P	Posted - 2008.10.24 16:10:00 - [25] Locked. Threads about killboard stats are not constructive and only encourage trolling. Locked.



Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.