| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Topic |
Jarvis Hellstrom
Gallente
The Flying Tigers
United Front Alliance
    |
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:15:00 -
[1]
Right now there are some very odd things going on in POS management. One of the things that we discovered in our corp (and no one seems to be able to find a way around) is that if you have any corp array access other than just viewing, you also have some very powerful rights management as regards the POS itself.
This is not good. The purpose of a corp array is, at least in our corp, to be able to pick up and drop stuff off as needed for other corp members. That might be ore, ammo, items for invention or manufacturing etc. I frequently drop missiles that I pick up as loot for those using Caldari ships for instance, because I don't use very many (if any) on my ships.
Rather than 'role management' each with overbroad powers, it would be good to see something less granular - more similar to what you can do with corp hangars in stations where you have offices, for instance. In this way you could give a new corp member access to the array so they could take out ammo etc. without giving them the ability to change the password, shut down the forcefield or unanchor the thing!
Please, CSM, could you examine this issue and see about bringing it up to CCP? We have filed a petition on it, but I believe that is unlikely to do more than wind up as a note someplace.
Thanks!
May God stand between you and harm in all the Empty places you must walk
(Old Egyptian Blessing) |
Jarvis Hellstrom
Gallente
The Flying Tigers
United Front Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:15:00 -
[2]
Right now there are some very odd things going on in POS management. One of the things that we discovered in our corp (and no one seems to be able to find a way around) is that if you have any corp array access other than just viewing, you also have some very powerful rights management as regards the POS itself.
This is not good. The purpose of a corp array is, at least in our corp, to be able to pick up and drop stuff off as needed for other corp members. That might be ore, ammo, items for invention or manufacturing etc. I frequently drop missiles that I pick up as loot for those using Caldari ships for instance, because I don't use very many (if any) on my ships.
Rather than 'role management' each with overbroad powers, it would be good to see something less granular - more similar to what you can do with corp hangars in stations where you have offices, for instance. In this way you could give a new corp member access to the array so they could take out ammo etc. without giving them the ability to change the password, shut down the forcefield or unanchor the thing!
Please, CSM, could you examine this issue and see about bringing it up to CCP? We have filed a petition on it, but I believe that is unlikely to do more than wind up as a note someplace.
Thanks!
May God stand between you and harm in all the Empty places you must walk
(Old Egyptian Blessing) |
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:28:00 -
[3]
This seems like pretty fundamental stuff. I wonder why it's not in place now?
------------------
Herschel's Lottery #1 - Win a Kronos! |
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:28:00 -
[4]
This seems like pretty fundamental stuff. I wonder why it's not in place now?
------------------
Herschel's Lottery #1 - Win a Kronos! |
Drake Draconis
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:32:00 -
[5]
Yeah.... I think this should apply to Corp Management period.
Not an easy task however.
But it should have a more comprehensive permissions system.
Much like a common Enterprise Business Network/File Server
|
Drake Draconis
|
Posted - 2008.10.06 22:32:00 -
[6]
Yeah.... I think this should apply to Corp Management period.
Not an easy task however.
But it should have a more comprehensive permissions system.
Much like a common Enterprise Business Network/File Server
|
Pezzle
Imperial Dreams
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 01:49:00 -
[7]
Tower management is terrible. Overhauls for permissions, security and operation are all needed.
|
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |