| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Topic |
Enjia Fullblood
Gallente
Black Serpent Technologies
Intrepid Crossing
    |
Posted - 2008.10.03 16:04:00 -
[1]
pretty self explanatory, the ability to place up to 4 sentry guns on gates and stations in a system that you have either sov 3 or 4 in. Make them have some kind of draw back so that they don't end up all over the place.
 |
Mr Friendly
That it Should Come to This
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 03:54:00 -
[2]
why? |
Aodha Khan
Minmatar
The Paratwa
FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 09:39:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Mr Friendly
why?
Defense?
Paratwa Recruitment |
Lia Gaeren
Caldari
Pole Dancing Vixens
|
Posted - 2008.10.04 13:44:00 -
[4]
Shouldn't defence be up to the holders of the system to provide rather than let some automated NPC mechanic do it for you?
Heck, why not just have sov 4 give you NPC roaming enforcers who Concordokken annyone they find if they belong to the wrong alliance?
|
ellie mayer
|
Posted - 2008.10.05 07:23:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Lia Gaeren
Shouldn't defence be up to the holders of the system to provide rather than let some automated NPC mechanic do it for you?
Heck, why not just have sov 4 give you NPC roaming enforcers who Concordokken annyone they find if they belong to the wrong alliance?
So you want all pos defences removed as well.
Never happen.
|
Phoenix492
UK1 Zero
|
Posted - 2008.10.05 09:49:00 -
[6]
why not make them controllable (using the POS gunner skill). So they won't fire unless there is a gunner there?
Blah. |
Ineun
Minmatar
House An'geles
Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 10:51:00 -
[7]
just make conquerable stations and outposts launch sentry guns as they are in empire (nerfed a little) that are configurable in aggro
no gate guns NO GATE GUNS!!!
:) ohai i is your resident Socialist... |
Arithron
Gallente
Gallente Trade Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.07 20:40:00 -
[8]
I can not see the reasoning behind this proposal. It can't be for defense- especially if you are proposing Sov 3 or 4 to have them...any alliance with that sov won't be needing gate guns...
It would also make it more difficult for small gangs and solo 0.0 players to travel about in 0.0 space. There should, IMO, be some encouraging reasons to do such activities rather than sit in Empire space all the time.
Take care,
Arithron
Better to be a live dog than a dead lion... |
Kazuma Saruwatari
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 06:23:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Kazuma Saruwatari on 12/10/2008 06:24:09
not every alliance with sov 3/4 in their space have the numbers at other peak times to fight off, say, a 20man camping of one's station or attack on a POS when no one's online.
Example: a US/UK based alliance losing a POS to an Aus/NZ/Asian based group and losing just because they have to force themselves to stay up/wake up early to fight them off. Many would rather just not play in this case, which means less revenue for CCP, and we all know how they can react when it means they're losing money.
Not every alliance with any sov for that matter have 24/7 slaves attached to their EVE clients staying on station to provide security.
Some people have lives beyond EVE.
-
 |
Stayche
Minmatar
Cruoris Seraphim
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:04:00 -
[10]
Can't think why irc would be interested in this sort of thing.....
|
|
Protar
Minmatar
Cruoris Seraphim
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:10:00 -
[11]
Is there a small gang giving IRC some trouble or something?
---- |
Kostantin Mort
Naqam
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:33:00 -
[12]
Could be, could be.
------
Innovation is a product of madness. |
Kaar
Art of War
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:33:00 -
[13]
I think this was on the drawing board at some point, but since jump bridges put an end to 90% of gate travel then they werent really needed.
---
---
|
Frozen Light
Art of War
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:37:00 -
[14]
I for one support this statement.
---
AWAR is recruiting |
kublai
Art of War
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:48:00 -
[15]
I'll take this as a compliment.
A-War Recruiting |
Cyno Sid
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:56:00 -
[16]
No to gate guns - But I do like the idea of being able to place a couple around an outpost - controlled from within by a gunner
|
Rawr Cristina
Caldari
Naqam
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 13:48:00 -
[17]
I do imagine that part of the responsibility of holding space in 0.0 was having to actually defend it; made oh so much easier by the tools you already have (hello System Scanners and Jump Bridges)
- Infectious - |
Kostantin Mort
Naqam
Exalted.
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 14:05:00 -
[18]
To be honest, you should be able to defend your space without logging in for months and not having to sacrifice ships to the enemy.
------
Innovation is a product of madness. |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |