| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Sidewayzracer
Caldari Deep Core Mining Inc.
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:09:00 -
[61]
Originally by: Vikarion Dear Carebears and other assorted scum...
I come before you on this day a victim of your endless whining, your groaning before the devs, your relentless attempts to make this game I love - yes, love, for it is one of my few entertainments and hobbies - into a relative, nay, a clone, of the pernicious and obnoxious cardboard-cut-out, cookie-cutter, unfailingly bland and unrelentingly boring "game" known as World of Warcraft.
One month shy of a year ago, I joined Eve after a long pilgrimage through various genres of MMORGS, looking for that fabled game that would give me true interaction. By chance - great, fortunate chance, or perhaps even blessing from a higher power - I discovered the wonderfully written story on the ambitious and daring heist by the fabled Guiding Hand Shining Club. I was amazed! Finally, a true sandbox, a world where anything could happen, a world with danger lurking around every corner.
I immediately subscribed! Not the 14-day trial for me, no. No, I was in. And, great PvPer that I am, I went racing off in my shiny Ibis to...mine. And mine. And mine some more. Slowly, and through the help of a generous player, I eventually gathered enough ISK to acquire an Osprey. It was a big step up. Dodging can-flippers and pirates, I scrabbled for every last ISK, and eventually made it to where I am today: a macro-killing, suicide-ganking, war-deccing griefer and pirate.
I have scrambled for the top relentlessly. Countless hours I have spent, staring at the screen, waiting for that last asteroid to pop, that market order to be sold, that last NPC to give up the ghost, that officer to finally spawn.
When I was a newbie, I did not whine when someone flew into the belts and popped my jetcans, despite the fact that they represented hours of work. When I got lofty'd and lost a billion ISK of ship and fittings because I tried to help someone, I did not whine, I merely posted a little tutorial on the forums on how to avoid it. When people tried to suicide gank me, they failed, because I never piloted AFK with anything good.
But you, you want the game to adapt to your needs, your desires, rather than using your mind to set the odds in your favor. You condemn suicide gankers as "gank-bears", and pirates as "pie-bears", and proclaim that CCP needs to eliminate us from the game.
Well, CCP listens to you, even if they ignore our concerns, and it may soon be all your way. Suicide ganking will no longer be profitable under any circumstances, war-decs will be eliminated or nerfed. I have no doubt that can-flipping and baiting will also soon be cut. CCP has decided - as elucidated by CCP Grayscale - that the illusion of danger is all that is needed in hi-sec. The reason that I joined - because I was always in danger and that the game was all about what players did - no longer seems like even a mild topic of interest to CCP's designers, who now merely try to appeal to the widest demographic.
Know this: that I, and I hope others like me, will not give up. I have no intention of lying down for these changes, or going gently into that soft, fluffy good night of PvP flagging and safe zones. I will whine, *****, scream, moan, troll, and lurk. I will kill your pods, gank your ships, pop the macro haulers you buy isk from, encourage those who scam you (though I do not scam myself), war-dec you, can-flip you, haunt you through your every moment in game and on the forums.
You see, I hate your pusillanimous whines, your endless calls for those outside of yourselves to help you, your desire to have the playing field tilted in your direction. I hate your willingness to smacktalk, cheat, lie, and act crudely before running to the safety of Concord. Most of all, I hate your utter unwillingness to let Eve be what it was, and your desire to change it into your own little version or a carebear haven.
Flame on.
-Vikarion
I Raise my glass to you fine sir
Let the wrecks fill the systems of this game while we can
 |

oilio
Caldari State War Academy
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:17:00 -
[62]
Originally by: Druadan Carebears are ****ing ruining this game. But the ebb and flow is how this shit works. If we're lucky, the game itself will ebb and flow and we'll see it toughen up to how it used to be. If we're not so lucky, the game will simply participate in the greater ebb and flow, and we'll see a day when EVE is even softer, and a new hardcore space game will arrive and we'll jump ship, leaving the carebears in the sand.
As long as I get a hardcore MMO on a single-server to play, I'm really not bothered if EVE dies.
I'm not sure that Eve will die, or that High Sec will be fluffy.
The lofty and the risk-free suicide gank were both damn near exploits.
I'm hoping that CCP will eventually make high sec system security and sovreignty more dynamic (as others have suggested). We already have FW. Why not have people joining CONCORD in a similar manner? If the rewards were high enough, low sec could be policed by CONCORD "militia", and pirates and criminals could (if they were concerted enough) erode the boundaries of high sec. CONCORD would still exist in space above 0.5, but the security status of all sytstems except a small core of newbie systems would be open to change. Get the system below 0.5, and there's no CONCORD any more until CONCORD agents retake it.
That could be really exciting if it was done well. |

Beltantis Torrence
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:18:00 -
[63]
That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
|

Clinically
Gallente ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:40:00 -
[64]
Hear hear! ________________ ANZAC Recruitment - NOW OPEN! Q. How do you clear a system of 400 Northern Monkeys? A. Remind them |

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:45:00 -
[65]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 00:46:41
Originally by: Beltantis Torrence That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
Dude - your in Faction Warfare - the very antipathy of "non conseusual pvp" on which EVE was originaly based before the New Breed of WOW Devs took over.
Your kills show you blobbing the feck out of the enemy. And flying cheap t1 fitted insured ships you don't care if you lose.
OF course you wont cry if the enemy shoots back, as you don't lose anything, but an annoying run to the respawn ground (oursulaert for a new ship)
SKUNK
|

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:50:00 -
[66]
Originally by: Beltantis Torrence That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
Check my security status. For crying out loud, I think I've said about 5 times now that I LIVE IN ZERO DOT ZERO. I CANNOT EVEN ENTER HI-SEC RIGHT NOW.
I am whining and yelling and generally making a fuss because I see CCP short-sightedly selling out and betraying its loyal customers to gain a bunch on inveterate whiny carebears. Heck, you guys make the old carebears look like piranhas.
Making no attempt to even things out for yourself and instead depending on CCP to fix the game in your favor is not how CCP said Eve was supposed to work. --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Shagrath Neptune
Series of Tubes
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:52:00 -
[67]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 00:46:41
Originally by: Beltantis Torrence That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
Dude - your in Faction Warfare - the very antipathy of "non conseusual pvp" on which EVE was originaly based before the New Breed of WOW Devs took over.
Your kills show you blobbing the feck out of the enemy. And flying cheap t1 fitted insured ships you don't care if you lose.
OF course you wont cry if the enemy shoots back, as you don't lose anything, but an annoying run to the respawn ground (oursulaert for a new ship)
SKUNK
So your big rebuttal to this guy is that he blobs when he pvps and you do not blob when you are ganking that unarmed solo Hulk or hauler?
I hope you were not trying to prove that you are a real honest to God hardcore pvper or anything like that. 
|

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:56:00 -
[68]
Originally by: Shagrath Neptune So your big rebuttal to this guy is that he blobs when he pvps and you do not blob when you are ganking that unarmed solo Hulk or hauler?
I hope you were not trying to prove that you are a real honest to God hardcore pvper or anything like that. 
LOL, Skunk doesn't need to prove anything to you. His record speaks for itself.
But he has a point - the guy doesn't have to worry about tactics or whatnot in PvP - he can just blob, then return to hi-sec to replace losses in safety. Oh joy.  --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Le Skunk
Low Sec Liberators
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 00:59:00 -
[69]
Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 01:00:13
Originally by: Shagrath Neptune
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 00:46:41
Originally by: Beltantis Torrence That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
Dude - your in Faction Warfare - the very antipathy of "non conseusual pvp" on which EVE was originaly based before the New Breed of WOW Devs took over.
Your kills show you blobbing the feck out of the enemy. And flying cheap t1 fitted insured ships you don't care if you lose.
OF course you wont cry if the enemy shoots back, as you don't lose anything, but an annoying run to the respawn ground (oursulaert for a new ship)
SKUNK
So your big rebuttal to this guy is that he blobs when he pvps and you do not blob when you are ganking that unarmed solo Hulk or hauler?
I hope you were not trying to prove that you are a real honest to God hardcore pvper or anything like that. 
No my point was that if your going to act all high and mighty yelling "ya big cowards only fight stuff that don't shoot back - you need to get risk in your pvp" it helps not to be
a) engaging in no risk PVP (fully insured, t1 cruisers) b) not fly around in massive blobs ganking lone dudes
Rather then suggesting suicide ganking needed excellent pvp skills, I was suggesting that many of the people who criticse suicide gankers, need to check their own pvp habits, and ask themselves if they consist solely of evenly matched 1v1s, and if they open them themselves up to much risk when they die anyway.
I suspect that in many of the cases, the answers are no and no.
SKUNK
|

Dave Davies
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:17:00 -
[70]
Originally by: Vikarion Know this: that I, and I hope others like me, will not give up. I have no intention of lying down for these changes, or going gently into that soft, fluffy good night of PvP flagging and safe zones. I will whine, *****, scream, moan, troll, and lurk. I will kill your pods, gank your ships, pop the macro haulers you buy isk from, encourage those who scam you (though I do not scam myself), war-dec you, can-flip you, haunt you through your every moment in game and on the forums.
*golf claps for Dr. Doom*
That's some mighty nice teen angst you got there.
Seriously buddy either you agree with balance decisions or you don't but is it really necessary to embarrass yourself and everybody else that way?
----- Pop Quiz -----
Can you tell me what's wrong with this sentence. |
|

Etho Demerzel
Gallente Holy Clan of the Cone
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:24:00 -
[71]
Originally by: Le Skunk
No my point was that if your going to act all high and mighty yelling "ya big cowards only fight stuff that don't shoot back - you need to get risk in your pvp" it helps not to be
a) engaging in no risk PVP (fully insured, t1 cruisers) b) not fly around in massive blobs ganking lone dudes
Rather then suggesting suicide ganking needed excellent pvp skills, I was suggesting that many of the people who criticse suicide gankers, need to check their own pvp habits, and ask themselves if they consist solely of evenly matched 1v1s, and if they open them themselves up to much risk when they die anyway.
I suspect that in many of the cases, the answers are no and no.
SKUNK
The ones acting high and mighty are those yelling "damn carebears spoiling eve", like you. Even if all pvp was forbidden in high sec, which is far far away from the truth, the only thing that would change is that coward people like you looking for easy targets wouldn't have those targets anymore. I am crying tears of blood for you, really.
If you consider yourself the leet pvper you certainly do, blobs shouldn't be a problem for you, go fight against the odds. But no, all you want is to feel good by bashing noobs. You guys disgust me. Stop whining and find yourselves some spine.
=====
"If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs." - CCP kieron... |

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:24:00 -
[72]
Originally by: Dave Davies
*golf claps for Dr. Doom*
That's some mighty nice teen angst you got there.
Seriously buddy either you agree with balance decisions or you don't but is it really necessary to embarrass yourself and everybody else that way?
You aren't really good at spotting intentional melodrama, are you?  --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Dave Davies
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:38:00 -
[73]
Originally by: Vikarion
You aren't really good at spotting intentional melodrama, are you? 
Yeah... you "intended" it, I "spotted" it. No probs here. 
I guess you'd like to cop to being "ironic" or engaging in "satire?"
----- Pop Quiz -----
Can you tell me what's wrong with this sentence. |

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:56:00 -
[74]
Originally by: Dave Davies
I guess you'd like to cop to being "ironic" or engaging in "satire?"
Oh no, I mean every word of what I said...I just said it in overblown, inspiring historical fashion. Because I'm cool like that. In a way you could only hope to be.  --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 01:59:00 -
[75]
Originally by: Etho Demerzel
The ones acting high and mighty are those yelling "damn carebears spoiling eve", like you. Even if all pvp was forbidden in high sec, which is far far away from the truth, the only thing that would change is that coward people like you looking for easy targets wouldn't have those targets anymore. I am crying tears of blood for you, really.
If we are acting high and mighty, it is not because we have elevated ourselves, but because you have lowered yourselves.
Originally by: Etho Demerzel If you consider yourself the leet pvper you certainly do, blobs shouldn't be a problem for you, go fight against the odds. But no, all you want is to feel good by bashing noobs. You guys disgust me. Stop whining and find yourselves some spine.
You really don't get it. Did you bother to look at Le Skunk's kill board? Do you bother to even consider who you are talking to before you make ad hominem attacks?
I see that your arguments are so weak that your only hope to succeed is to attack the character of those who are far more competent than yourself. --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Mankirks Wife
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 02:24:00 -
[76]
Originally by: Le Skunk
Dude - your in Faction Warfare - the very antipathy of "non conseusual pvp" on which EVE was originaly based before the New Breed of WOW Devs took over.
Say what you want, but FW (once they work the kinks out) is likely the future of 'sanctioned' lowsec pvp - kind of like how sov wars are the main thrust of 0.0 pvp.
Piracy is the only playstyle I've seen consistently nerfed during my stay here. While it's easy to see why - just look at what happened to lowsec once the pirates got the upper hand - it still leaves a small, but still significant number of people out in the cold. I might go so far as to say very small as all these topics are constantly getting bumped by the same three or four people with an agenda, but I digress...
Personally I agree with the spirit of the suicide ganking change, though not it's implementation (I would have rebalanced freighters since they're at the core of the issue, rather than spanking suicide ganking in general - these changes will do nothig to dissuade Jihadswarm, who are not motivated by money. No other ship class is defenseless against suicide ganks.). ---
 |

Shagrath Neptune
Series of Tubes
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 02:46:00 -
[77]
Edited by: Shagrath Neptune on 05/09/2008 02:46:49
Originally by: Vikarion
LOL, Skunk doesn't need to prove anything to you. His record speaks for itself.
But he has a point - the guy doesn't have to worry about tactics or whatnot in PvP - he can just blob, then return to hi-sec to replace losses in safety. Oh joy. 
I wasn't talking to you so you can put your pom poms away. However, If i ever decide to acknowledge your presence again, i will call you "Skunk's personal cheerleader." Sound good? 
And no, he doesn't really have a point. He is only throwing around generalizations and stereotyping that part of the game. FW PvP can be much more than mindless blobbing and the use of T1 ships.
He probably knows about as much as FW as I do about Suicide ganking haulers. So maybe we are both guilty of talking out of our asses.
|

Shagrath Neptune
Series of Tubes
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 02:57:00 -
[78]
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 01:00:13
Originally by: Shagrath Neptune
Originally by: Le Skunk Edited by: Le Skunk on 05/09/2008 00:46:41
Originally by: Beltantis Torrence That's odd, seems like there's a lot more *****ing and crying from people who claim to be hardcore PVP'ers (yet spend all their time chasing hulks and mission fit ships that pose no threat to them) cry and moan all day about changes that mean they might be forced to fight people who want to fight them back.
I'm ok with 'non-consensual PVP' but I'm also not going to cry if the people I fight are prepped to fight back - I'm certainly not going to be like the OP and come cry about it here.
Dude - your in Faction Warfare - the very antipathy of "non conseusual pvp" on which EVE was originaly based before the New Breed of WOW Devs took over.
Your kills show you blobbing the feck out of the enemy. And flying cheap t1 fitted insured ships you don't care if you lose.
OF course you wont cry if the enemy shoots back, as you don't lose anything, but an annoying run to the respawn ground (oursulaert for a new ship)
SKUNK
So your big rebuttal to this guy is that he blobs when he pvps and you do not blob when you are ganking that unarmed solo Hulk or hauler?
I hope you were not trying to prove that you are a real honest to God hardcore pvper or anything like that. 
No my point was that if your going to act all high and mighty yelling "ya big cowards only fight stuff that don't shoot back - you need to get risk in your pvp" it helps not to be
a) engaging in no risk PVP (fully insured, t1 cruisers) b) not fly around in massive blobs ganking lone dudes
Rather then suggesting suicide ganking needed excellent pvp skills, I was suggesting that many of the people who criticse suicide gankers, need to check their own pvp habits, and ask themselves if they consist solely of evenly matched 1v1s, and if they open them themselves up to much risk when they die anyway.
I suspect that in many of the cases, the answers are no and no.
SKUNK
First of all, I wasn't really yelling at you but i take offense when some guy who admits that his pvp consists of high sec ganking and meta game mechanics lumps all FW pilots into one basket. You obviously never participated in it and it shows in your posts.
Now I am not going to sit here and lie and say there is no blobbing and there aren't quite a few noobs in FW. There are. However, there is some high quality pvp in it as well.
I for one fly around in FW solo in Hacs more than i am in a fleet or gang. I guess that would meet your conditions a) and b) huh? 
|

Dave Davies
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 04:04:00 -
[79]
Originally by: Vikarion
Originally by: Dave Davies
I guess you'd like to cop to being "ironic" or engaging in "satire?"
Oh no, I mean every word of what I said...I just said it in overblown, inspiring historical fashion. Because I'm cool like that. In a way you could only hope to be. 
lol
----- Pop Quiz -----
Can you tell me what's wrong with this sentence. |

Etho Demerzel
Gallente Holy Clan of the Cone
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 04:15:00 -
[80]
Edited by: Etho Demerzel on 05/09/2008 04:15:46
Originally by: Vikarion
If we are acting high and mighty, it is not because we have elevated ourselves, but because you have lowered yourselves.
Just in your eyes, and in your distorted views. Which also can be understood as YOU have lowered us, which is exactly the same of elevating yourself.
Quote: You really don't get it. Did you bother to look at Le Skunk's kill board? Do you bother to even consider who you are talking to before you make ad hominem attacks?
I see that your arguments are so weak that your only hope to succeed is to attack the character of those who are far more competent than yourself.
I get it. I know exactly with whom I am talking. Le Skunk is nothing special, and neither are you, for more that you like to think you are. You are just two cowards, too afraid to look for real pvp and who want to bash newbies because that is about the only thing you can do. Anyone who frets about these last changes can't be a serious pvper. They are completely irrelevant for those who play this game in low sec and 0.0.
=====
"If a member of the EVE community finds he or she cannot accept our current level of transparency, we bid you good luck in finding a company that meets your needs." - CCP kieron... |
|

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 04:46:00 -
[81]
Originally by: Etho Demerzel I get it. I know exactly with whom I am talking. Le Skunk is nothing special, and neither are you, for more that you like to think you are. You are just two cowards, too afraid to look for real pvp and who want to bash newbies because that is about the only thing you can do. Anyone who frets about these last changes can't be a serious pvper. They are completely irrelevant for those who play this game in low sec and 0.0.
No, I'm afraid you don't. See, you seem to be under the impression that someone should hold your hand through the game, carefully sheperding you and your precious ISK so that not one is lost.
And because you are so afraid to actually experience the game in any other form than that of a digital pixel collection simulation, you seek to selfishly ask for conditions which, while temporarily beneficial to you, will ultimately hurt not only every player, but even CCP.
Because of the way hi-sec/low-sec/0.0 are structured, the economic effect of a truly safe area is drastic upon the economies of areas which are hazardous. You refuse to acknowledge this, either because of a basic lack of understanding of economics, or worse, willing blindness to the material facts of the game.
The hi-sec economy has been increasingly destructive to the other parts of the game, due chiefly to the fact that CCP has made safety and profitability far too high when compared to the price of ships and modules, and the earning capacity for individual pilots in 0.0. It cannot be argued that it is far easier to make massive sums of ISK in hi-sec, all without fear of retaliation.
Regardless of the fact that CCP is breaking their promises about this being a hard, cold, and dangerous universe, the fact is that the actual market statistics bear me out. The massive ISK faucets of level four missions and other risk free activities continue to exacerbate the problem of more material available than is needed by the market. Market saturation for many items has already been reached.
And because you don't want to face the fact that you ARE wrong, demonstrably, you instead head to the forums to call hurl insults at us when we protest this slow demolition of the game we love. --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Shagrath Neptune
Series of Tubes
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 04:53:00 -
[82]
Originally by: Vikarion
You really don't get it. Did you bother to look at Le Skunk's kill board? Do you bother to even consider who you are talking to before you make ad hominem attacks?
I see that your arguments are so weak that your only hope to succeed is to attack the character of those who are far more competent than yourself.
This wasn't directed at me but your unconditional love for Skunk is rather disgusting. Get a room. 
I don't know much about Skunk's abilities in game. I do know that he and a handful of others have done nothing but cry and whine on these boards for the past week though.
Just because a guy has a kill board and posts a lot here doesn't make him anything special. This mentality that everyone should take someone's posts as gospel just because you respect him more than you respect yourself tells me that you have a deep rooted inferiority complex.
That is a bit scary to be honest.
|

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:26:00 -
[83]
Originally by: Shagrath Neptune
This wasn't directed at me but your unconditional love for Skunk is rather disgusting. Get a room. 
I don't know much about Skunk's abilities in game. I do know that he and a handful of others have done nothing but cry and whine on these boards for the past week though.
Just because a guy has a kill board and posts a lot here doesn't make him anything special. This mentality that everyone should take someone's posts as gospel just because you respect him more than you respect yourself tells me that you have a deep rooted inferiority complex.
That is a bit scary to be honest.
I respect Skunk, and Nexa Necis, and Malcanis, and Ki An, and many others, because they actually seem to care about this game. I don't respect people who rag on them in ignorance and general idiocy. And I don't respect people who think that they are capable of performing psychological profiles over the internets.
In the end, it's a game, but I intend to fight for what I belienve is best for it, and if that means shouting down people like you, all the better. Arguing is fun. :-)
I am a forum PvPer!  --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|

Lord Obsidian
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:36:00 -
[84]
Why is it not acceptable for people to say the pirates need to change the way they play, but acceptable for pirates to demand everyone change the way they play eve, and infact demand all of eve is changed to suit their very narrow, non sustaining view of how the game should be? If CCP did what you want and made the game the way you want it, about 80% (a number often quoted as people who dont leave empire) would leave the game. Do you really think CCP could sustain eve then? Or would it go like Vanguard and close\down grade everything. |

NoOth3rDestiny
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:39:00 -
[85]
CCP do make a lot of changes to cater for players of other PvE MMO types, it won't change or stop. The game has grown since it's early times, and changes made have been to allow newer players to jump in and not be scared or griefed out of the game. Changes also bring in more people, thus more money, which is the goal of CCP mostly, apart from maintaining an MMORPG.
A lot of changes are for good reason, as they stop exploits, prevent people using loop holes to ruin someone elses gaming experience or stop them possibly breaking the game engine. Some changes attempt to balance, but most of the time, you balance one thing and throw off the balance of something else.
I started this game because it had a good death penalty, ingame economy, skill system and is a very large game world. If you want to always be at risk, live in low sec.
|

Shagrath Neptune
Series of Tubes
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:41:00 -
[86]
Originally by: Vikarion
Originally by: Shagrath Neptune
This wasn't directed at me but your unconditional love for Skunk is rather disgusting. Get a room. 
I don't know much about Skunk's abilities in game. I do know that he and a handful of others have done nothing but cry and whine on these boards for the past week though.
Just because a guy has a kill board and posts a lot here doesn't make him anything special. This mentality that everyone should take someone's posts as gospel just because you respect him more than you respect yourself tells me that you have a deep rooted inferiority complex.
That is a bit scary to be honest.
I respect Skunk, and Nexa Necis, and Malcanis, and Ki An, and many others, because they actually seem to care about this game. I don't respect people who rag on them in ignorance and general idiocy. And I don't respect people who think that they are capable of performing psychological profiles over the internets.
In the end, it's a game, but I intend to fight for what I belienve is best for it, and if that means shouting down people like you, all the better. Arguing is fun. :-)
I am a forum PvPer! 
The thing is, you are not really fighting for anything. Any battle that you perceived as existing has already been lost. CCP did what they did and will continue to do whatever they think is best for the game.
I wasn't trying to rag on Skunk. I was attacking his ignorance of FW. Maybe he will come back on here and attack my ignorance of high sec suicide ganking. That would be fair to me. /shrug
I don't mind if you respect those guys or anyone else you choose to. Just don't name drop and expect that to make your arguments stronger. It just makes you sound like a mindless groupie.
|

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:41:00 -
[87]
Originally by: Lord Obsidian Why is it not acceptable for people to say the pirates need to change the way they play, but acceptable for pirates to demand everyone change the way they play eve, and infact demand all of eve is changed to suit their very narrow, non sustaining view of how the game should be? If CCP did what you want and made the game the way you want it, about 80% (a number often quoted as people who dont leave empire) would leave the game. Do you really think CCP could sustain eve then? Or would it go like Vanguard and close\down grade everything.
First off, quoting that statistic in that way makes you look very ignorant indeed.
Second there's all the difference in the world between asking for FEWER restrictions on players and asking for MORE restrictions. Why do you hate freedom so much?
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Galan Amarias
Amarr The Drekla Consortium
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:44:00 -
[88]
Just for the reccord, I've been ratting my sec up just for this patch. I have always been an advocate of Suicide Ganking, now I plan to proove that it's still viabal and probably more profitable than ever. An untanked hauler dosen't need much killing and they should feel even safer with their afk loot now that ganking has been "nerfed."
Ultimately suicide ganking relies on another player to be stupid. Stupidity can't be nerfed by CCP lord knows they've tried with all the warnings and tutorials and what not. Fear not friends, Jita may stop being the kill capitol of EVE, but idiots will still fund suicide ganking for us.
-Galan

CSM fails nano |

Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 05:57:00 -
[89]
Originally by: Galan Amarias Just for the reccord, I've been ratting my sec up just for this patch. I have always been an advocate of Suicide Ganking, now I plan to proove that it's still viabal and probably more profitable than ever. An untanked hauler dosen't need much killing and they should feel even safer with their afk loot now that ganking has been "nerfed."
Ultimately suicide ganking relies on another player to be stupid. Stupidity can't be nerfed by CCP lord knows they've tried with all the warnings and tutorials and what not. Fear not friends, Jita may stop being the kill capitol of EVE, but idiots will still fund suicide ganking for us.
-Galan
Keep us posted.
CONCORD provide consequences, not safety; only you can do that. |

Vikarion
Caldari BLACK 0RIGIN Red Dawn Alliance
 |
Posted - 2008.09.05 06:10:00 -
[90]
Good luck, but quite a few people already tried and posted the results in C&P.
It's pretty hard. Almost impossible. At least according to them. I get shot on sight in Empire, so it may be a while before I can test it.   --------
EVE - The only non-consensual PvP MMORPG*
*Note: does not contain non-consensual PvP as of 8/3/2008
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |