Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
StainLessStealRat
101010 Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.15 11:55:00 -
[1831]
|
Emperor Ryan
Imperial Syndicate Forces
|
Posted - 2008.08.15 13:10:00 -
[1832]
against
|
Serious Rikk
The Legendary Fleet
|
Posted - 2008.08.15 18:58:00 -
[1833]
Changes need to be made. The proposals on test however are TOO drastic. One thing at a time in my opinion.
I like the 'scram turns MWD off' idea I think that nano's and polys should stack I think that OD's and Aux thrusters should stack
I don't think OD's and Nano's should stack, they affect completely different attributes of a ship! Drop that bit and the change gets a bit more balance IMO -- Noble Scumbag
|
Dirtball
PinK TacO Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.08.15 23:09:00 -
[1834]
I have 2 chars with 4 clones each with a head full of snakes
|
DiamondEdges
Black Lotus Foundation Damned Pirates
|
Posted - 2008.08.16 03:01:00 -
[1835]
Edited by: DiamondEdges on 16/08/2008 03:01:31 The nerf as stated in the blog is udderly unfair and unbalanced. While I agree ships need to have a cap put on speed for it's ship class I do not agree that the nerf as it is proposed right now.
problems I see-
Interceptors will no longer be capable of doing their designed roles
Warp disruptors will be over powered and cause unstable game play options for smaller ships and gangs designed to move fast as a counter to larger fleets or for the intentions of tackle and actual interception
you're making ships far slower, and nerfing all forms of speed moduals and then making some of this completely redundant by suggesting that webs need to be nerfed.
All in all wether you like nanoed ships " wich by the way are no longer actually nano ships already due to nano nerfs prior " or you don't like them speedy guys, the real point is speed is suppose to be a legit part to this game as designed by ccp in the form of ships with bonuses to go fast, and have mwd duration bonuses.
On a scale of 1-10 this nerf gets a 10 on the " not thought out prior to publication " system
I highly suggest people look into this fully and without emotion or favortisim and come to a feasable and proper means of reducing over speed ships that should NOT go as fast as they can right now. IE: battle ships, bc's and yes even hacs can go at speeds they should not be capable of.
I did come up with a thought, wich is sure to have some if not full out rejection. But I was thinking a possible dammage drawback to making ships too fast for it's ship type.
IE: A battleship given a max safe speed of 1.2 kms would take dammage to the hull wich will eventually end in destruction of the ship for going over it's intended speed for the ship class.
This in fact would be closer to a real life situation where as the structure is only made to take so much thrust and speed on certian moving objects before the structure becomes dammaged and unstable.
Just a thought " smack away "
|
Efdi
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 04:32:00 -
[1836]
Nanos may need a bit of toning down, but these changes are absurd. _______________________________ Yes, I am an alt. No, I can't post with my main; he's forum banned. Yes, I will be happy to smack you with my main when I'm unbanned. |
Izo Alabaster
Repo Industries R.E.P.O.
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 15:52:00 -
[1837]
Against, but only because it seems CCP will bork it all up worse with their proposed changes than it already is.
|
Julius Rigel
House Rigel
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 16:36:00 -
[1838]
AGAINST
The intention is good, but the approach is all wrong. Don't nerf speed as an entirety just because it's being used generously in pvp. And let's all face it, blobs are not fun. If I hadn't already given up pvp for the foreseeable future, I would threaten to give up pvp! <insert angry fist shaking here>
Julius Rigel, NPC-PC equal rights activist! |
Yelram
AnTi.
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 20:41:00 -
[1839]
/signed
Why does CCP hate my Brutor roots?
|
Montaron
Celestial Asylum
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 21:04:00 -
[1840]
Against! -------------------------------------------
|
|
Thorensen
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 22:15:00 -
[1841]
Against
|
ian666
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 22:18:00 -
[1842]
against
|
LLeugh
Starlancers
|
Posted - 2008.08.17 23:24:00 -
[1843]
Cheers felysta
Sheer insanity. A scrambler shutting down your microwarp drive will turn all frigs into flying coffins.
If you are not living life on the edge you are taking up too much room
|
Max Deth
|
Posted - 2008.08.18 20:10:00 -
[1844]
against. |
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 02:32:00 -
[1845]
|
Mandinka
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 02:34:00 -
[1846]
|
Kareena Evol
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 02:35:00 -
[1847]
|
Xlex Dominator
Minmatar D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 06:20:00 -
[1848]
Against
Needed to be looked at, but not crazy nerf |
SuperSarge
FIRMA Cosa Nostra.
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 08:33:00 -
[1849]
Edited by: SuperSarge on 19/08/2008 08:33:28 current nerfbat to big. |
Atomos Darksun
Infortunatus Eventus Obsidian Empire
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 08:51:00 -
[1850]
[X] Support |
|
Alkeena
Unitas Nusquam Est FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 09:37:00 -
[1851]
Hamfisted attempt |
Relyen
Digital Fury Corporation Digital Renegades
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 13:39:00 -
[1852]
I am Relyen and I approve this message. |
prdelac
Caldari 47R THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.08.19 15:36:00 -
[1853]
the nano nerf is to hard hitting one is needed jsut not the one CCP is planing |
Amarr Holymight
Bat Country Vanguard.
|
Posted - 2008.08.20 02:01:00 -
[1854]
Originally by: Serious Rikk Changes need to be made. The proposals on test however are TOO drastic. One thing at a time in my opinion.
I like the 'scram turns MWD off' idea I think that nano's and polys should stack I think that OD's and Aux thrusters should stack
I don't think OD's and Nano's should stack, they affect completely different attributes of a ship! Drop that bit and the change gets a bit more balance IMO
This makes sense to me something I thought myself might work. |
sakana
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.08.20 18:17:00 -
[1855]
Almost two thousand replies to this thread.
Will be interesting to see if CCP even notice.
|
N0N4M3
Minmatar Oberon Incorporated Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2008.08.20 18:49:00 -
[1856]
I support the nano nerf |
MentaFox
The Chaotic Order Void.
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 13:52:00 -
[1857]
yo |
Thaanvanite
Di-Tron Heavy Industries Atlas Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.21 17:37:00 -
[1858]
I liked diamond's idea of taking damage once a ship goes past a certain speed, so long as the speed caps are reasonable and still give the option of speed tanking.
I loath the day in EVE where my only option is to throw plates or extenders on my ship and hope our blob is bigger than the hostiles. |
Kira Lady
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 06:12:00 -
[1859]
AGAINST
|
cain mjolnir
|
Posted - 2008.08.22 08:03:00 -
[1860]
against the nerf
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |