Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:20:00 -
[361] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Proven wrong over the fact that "There are RMT sites that I can find on google" does not equal "DRF space is botting and RMT central"
Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument.
I'd say it is only an outdated statement, being that the only reason why it is not still RMT and Botting central is because other regions have caught up. And I made that statement prior, solely in the hopes to find some common ground with Mr. Red Legion guy, only to later discover that he was not interested in doing so. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4729
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:30:00 -
[362] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippa, you just can't be stopped. Sure I can. It's trivially easy, in fact. Just provide evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom (or, alternatively, retract those statements since you cannot provide any such evidence).
Quote:Your view is not universal, and in this instance you are strait up wrong. Actually, it is universal GÇö there's an entire formal fallacy with a 2,000-year history behind it to describe what you're doing. I'm not wrong for the simple fact that I'm not making any claim GÇö you are, and you are unable to support it.
Quote:Clearly you are not reading all post pertaining to this discussion, if you claim that only I am to blame. Of course you're the only one to blame GÇö you're the one making the claim; you're the one not fulfilling your burden of proof (you know, providing any evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom, in case you missed it).
Quote:I also disagree with your stance, because the only thing that I am shouting loudly, is where I stand. GǪwhich is irrelevant since that's not what's in question. What's in question is your inability to provide evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. It doesn't matter how loudly you shout your stance because it is not relevant to the question being discussed GÇö it's just you trying to throw in a trawler worth of red herrings in an attempt to get out of the deep hole you've dug for yourself.
Quote:I'd say it is only an outdated statement So you retract your claim to detailed knowledge then? The reason he had no interest in finding a common ground was most likely because you had no ground to stand on to begin with because you couldn't provide any evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. The common ground would simply be his ground, because it is the only one available until you prove otherwise. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8380
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:30:00 -
[363] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Proven wrong over the fact that "There are RMT sites that I can find on google" does not equal "DRF space is botting and RMT central"
Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument. I'd say it is only an outdated statement, being that the only reason why it is not still RMT and Botting central is because other regions have caught up. And I made that statement prior, solely in the hopes to find some common ground with Mr. Red Legion guy, only to later discover that he was not interested in doing so. Making statements that you know to be false "in the hopes to find some common ground" is kind of silly.
e: f,b Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:32:00 -
[364] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Proven wrong over the fact that "There are RMT sites that I can find on google" does not equal "DRF space is botting and RMT central"
Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument. I'd say it is only an outdated statement, being that the only reason why it is not still RMT and Botting central is because other regions have caught up. And I made that statement prior, solely in the hopes to find some common ground with Mr. Red Legion guy, only to later discover that he was not interested in doing so. Making statements that you know to be false "in the hopes to find some common ground" is kind of silly.
Incomplete is not the same as false. Go look it up.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2742
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:33:00 -
[365] - Quote
Selinate wrote:The Mittani wrote:about 70% of the badposts in this thread can be summed up as 'nerf charismatic attractive people with a modicum of social graces who know how to have a good time on the town'
..I've seen you... ......you are not attractive, my friend........
you're right:
i'm fabulous~
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:33:00 -
[366] - Quote
Tippia wrote:evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom.
This appears to be your topic not mine. I have stated my topic repeatedly for (going on) 4 pages now. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Cadinie
The Maverick Navy Against ALL Authorities
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:33:00 -
[367] - Quote
Ohh democracy, you so funny.
What it comes down to is as what has been stated many times in this thread. The problem lies with the inherent flaw of ANY form of vote backed representation. When the sole factor of election for authority is based on amount of votes, the major parties will always use their influence over their own majority to get their representative elected (large alliances).
The alternative which would be CCP choosing at random leads to people who don't know the game, or favoritism by the devs. This is also a terrible idea. Realistically the best idea would be a hybrid of the two.
The best system would be vote driven, but it should be decided into tiers of influence. mega alliances that hold multiple regions should be put at the largest size tier (with exceptions made when needed like for PL or any other large alliance that may not choose to hold space) Then in the second tier you would have smaller alliances that ride on the back of the larger alliances, or secure a small amount of space for their self. Then you go down to tier three which are lowsec / nullsec based, but not that large and not space holding (the true pirate style PvPers) and finally you have the smallest tier, the highsec no space holding corporations.
Each tier should have roughly the same amount of representation power, and roughly the same amount of candidates (lets say 4 per tier?) that way you cover a wide range of EVE life, and have people from different alliances and lifestyles instead of all people in nullsec or whoever has the most votes. This kind of system is an augmented form of democracy that could help to solve the one sided representation that is currently bitched about.
I realize there is probably a single term that describes the entire system I just described, but I'm not exactly a politician or political major so I'm afraid I can't give you a simple word that you could look up on wiki to use as a reference hahaha. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4729
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:34:00 -
[368] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Incomplete is not the same as false. Go look it up. They're not incomplete GÇö they're unfounded and unproven. From a truth perspective, that makes them false by default.
Quote:This appears to be your topic not mine. Nope. You made the claim; the burden of proof is yours. You fail to live up to it, making your claim false by default. I'm simply reminding you of what the question is and not letting you go off on irrelevant tangents without confirming or denying that original claim. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:37:00 -
[369] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Incomplete is not the same as false. Go look it up. They're not incomplete GÇö they're unfounded and unproven. From a truth perspective, that makes them false by default. Quote:This appears to be your topic not mine. Nope. You made the claim; the burden of proof is yours. You fail to live up to it, making your claim false by default.
I made a detailed claim of precisely who is RMT'ing and botting in nullsec? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:38:00 -
[370] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:If you took the time to read the part you quoted, you would have noticed that you pretty much completely reversed the truth here.
.....Combined with far to much manipulation to Pyramid quote... Let me Underline The Important Parts For YouYa know... since you consistently rewrite history, manipulate and take things out of context...Your version of the truth is not by default, everyone else's truth. This is also something that alludes narcissistic, debate team champions, such as yourself. Your ability to manipulate terms is nicely developed, no doubt over years of practice, but that ability can only make you an aspiring politician or a lawyer, and less of an aspiring scientist or a philosopher. Assuming that even matters to you, since you seem to put such a high value on "winning". If I say that a public domain possesses easy and readily available information on the subject, and in great multitude, then that is my stance. Your insistence to provide google searches and links for the readier, is in fact, directly contradictory to my stance. You and Mr Red Legion guy have chosen to use that perspective as fodder for more then 3 pages, like some idiot politician running a smear campaign because they have nothing truly of substance to offer. I CANNOT possibly ACCURATELY represent, on these gaming forums, the ORGY of information that would suddenly appear to the reader if they bothered to type a short string of words into google, it is FAR TO VAST and you know that. Thus, your tireless baiting of me, and I am not biting, nor will I be swayed or manipulated by such transparent and weak drivel.. My proof exists in full, beyond this gaming venue and it is 100% Contingent on it's state of easy accessibility to everyone who desires to seek it out. 1. Information: is public, readily available and easy to find. 2. Location:internet browser3. Key words: "RMT MMO's" "Bots MMORPG's" "RMT and Botting MMO's" or any other combination. 4. Potential reading material: consists of literally millions of pages of text, all with remarkably similar information. proving that RMT and Botting are now commonplace in ALL Major MMO'sThat is legit, regardless of how much you complain, and regardless of your ill need to get the last word in on a video game forum. My stance is rational, sensible and overloaded with evidence readily available to all. The reader has direction, guidance and a commentary on what they are expected to see. After they then do so, THEY can decide, not you. Them making their own choice, and me not telling them what to think (like you do so often) is the heart and soul of my stance, it's length and breadth and my proof is contingent on the readier's decision making process after the fact. All that you are doing is baiting me with your imagined version of the truth, in the hopes of developing more poop to fling at me. It is not working, and with each passing page your truest nature is beginning to reveal itself. I am happy to take part, although I suspect that most of the people here already knew what you were about anyway. I am also happy to keep throwing facts in your face... Ya know, instead of just bending over to your imagined realities like everyone else does.
My claim... again. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|
MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
161
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:38:00 -
[371] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument.
Philosophical kinda' thing.....which I realize the spread sheet crowd doesn't exactly embrace.
It might in fact be a valid argument. An invalid or weak argument does not make the premise false. If the debater with a differing viewpoint cared to disprove the assertion with facts and figures, then, it's wrong. But simply declaring the other person wrong based on arbitrary "rules of debate" is equally invalid.
It's also a weak argument.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8380
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:41:00 -
[372] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Lyris Nairn wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Proven wrong over the fact that "There are RMT sites that I can find on google" does not equal "DRF space is botting and RMT central"
Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument. I'd say it is only an outdated statement, being that the only reason why it is not still RMT and Botting central is because other regions have caught up. And I made that statement prior, solely in the hopes to find some common ground with Mr. Red Legion guy, only to later discover that he was not interested in doing so. Making statements that you know to be false "in the hopes to find some common ground" is kind of silly. Incomplete is not the same as false. Go look it up. Yes, it is. You are the weakest link. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4729
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 19:43:00 -
[373] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I made a detailed claim of precisely who is RMT'ing and botting in nullsec? Yes. That's how all of this started. If you made it in error, now (or, more accurately, 10 pages ago) would be a good time to say so. No, that is a different and completely irrelevant claim that no-one has ever questioned.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
370
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:59:00 -
[374] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Killstealing wrote:uhhhhhhh
a vote for mittens is a vote for kittens Don't be silly. A vote for mittens is a vote for puppies! :3 oh man what a cutie |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:09:00 -
[375] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I made a detailed claim of precisely who is RMT'ing and botting in nullsec? Yes. That's how all of this started. If you made it in error, now (or, more accurately, 10 pages ago) would be a good time to say so. No, that is a different and completely irrelevant claim that no-one has ever questioned.
I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because a statement like "Drone space is botting central" most certainly does not fall under that category, and at this point you have deviated from reality so far that I have no idea what you are talking about. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:11:00 -
[376] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Lyris Nairn wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Proven wrong over the fact that "There are RMT sites that I can find on google" does not equal "DRF space is botting and RMT central"
Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument. I'd say it is only an outdated statement, being that the only reason why it is not still RMT and Botting central is because other regions have caught up. And I made that statement prior, solely in the hopes to find some common ground with Mr. Red Legion guy, only to later discover that he was not interested in doing so. Making statements that you know to be false "in the hopes to find some common ground" is kind of silly. Incomplete is not the same as false. Go look it up. Yes, it is. You are the weakest link.
I don't need to justify why I might attempt to find a common ground in a debate, to someone who doesn't seem to understand why I would bother doing such a thing. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4729
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:20:00 -
[377] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. GǪexcept that the entire problem is that you didn't do just that. You made claims without the evidence to support it.
Eternum Praetorian wrote:I don't need to justify why I might attempt to find a common ground in a debate, to someone who doesn't seem to understand why I would bother doing such a thing. You don't have to, but that doesn't particularly change the change the fact that finding common ground between some point of view and something we can only assume is falsehood (since you've not been able to provide any proof to the contrary) is still quite silly.
It rather questions the value of the effort to do so to begin with, and without your justification, it seems quite pointless. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:22:00 -
[378] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I don't need to justify why I might attempt to find a common ground in a debate, to someone who doesn't seem to understand why I would bother doing such a thing. You don't have to, but that doesn't particularly change the change the fact that finding common ground between some point of view and something we can only assume is falsehood (since you've not been able to provide any proof to the contrary) is still quite silly. It rather questions the value of the effort to do so to begin with, and without your justification, it seems quite pointless.
You seem to have responded only to the post that was NOT directed towards you. What's wrong, you could not find a spot in this thread to quote?
Here I will repost it for you...
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because a statement like "Drone space is botting central" most certainly does not fall under that category, and at this point you have deviated so far from reality that I have no idea what you are talking about.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4729
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:25:00 -
[379] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:You seem to have responded only to the post that was NOT directed towards you. I responded to both. I just had to start with that one because it was so unrelentingly silly. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:26:00 -
[380] - Quote
Now you are dodging... You lose.
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:I made a detailed claim of precisely who is RMT'ing and botting in nullsec? Yes. That's how all of this started. If you made it in error, now (or, more accurately, 10 pages ago) would be a good time to say so. No, that is a different and completely irrelevant claim that no-one has ever questioned. I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. Because a statement like "Drone space is botting central" most certainly does not fall under that category, and at this point you have deviated so far from reality that I have no idea what you are talking about.
And you can't even support YOUR claim with as much as a forum quote. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4730
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:30:00 -
[381] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Now you are dodging. No, I'm explaining to you why you still GÇö 12 pages on GÇö fail to understand your very simple, very basic, and very fundamental error.
Quote:I think you should quote the part where I submitted evidence /statements regarding detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. GǪexcept (again) that the entire problem is that you failed to do just that and that you have continually dodged your burden of proof ever since. You made claims without the evidence to support it. You know this. Stop being an idiot and answer the questions people have asked you for the last 12 pages or simply admit that you ****** up; that you lied; that you made unsupported claims; that you pulled assertions out of your ass and then tried to cover it up with general sweeping claims that completely lacked the level of specificity needed to support your claims. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:32:00 -
[382] - Quote
No quote? Ok.... I guess your blowing hot air because your claim cannot be substantiated in any way shape or form. In fact after careful review of this thread, it is not only inaccurate it is entirely made up. You manipulated text one to many times, screwed up and got caught.
Now deal with it. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
643
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:34:00 -
[383] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:Selinate wrote:Yes. He has been proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument. Philosophical kinda' thing.....which I realize the spread sheet crowd doesn't exactly embrace. It might in fact be a valid argument. An invalid or weak argument does not make the premise false. If the debater with a differing viewpoint cared to disprove the assertion with facts and figures, then, it's wrong. But simply declaring the other person wrong based on arbitrary "rules of debate" is equally invalid. It's also a weak argument. "Proven wrong in that this is not a valid argument"
This is a very simple sentence meaning that a person has been proven wrong in thinking that his or her argument was valid.
An argument is defined as a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong, straight from the dictionary.
Very simple. I don't know how you're not getting this. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:36:00 -
[384] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Tippia wrote:If you took the time to read the part you quoted, you would have noticed that you pretty much completely reversed the truth here.
.....Combined with far to much manipulation to Pyramid quote... Let me Underline The Important Parts For YouYa know... since you consistently rewrite history, manipulate and take things out of context...Your version of the truth is not by default, everyone else's truth. This is also something that alludes narcissistic, debate team champions, such as yourself. Your ability to manipulate terms is nicely developed, no doubt over years of practice, but that ability can only make you an aspiring politician or a lawyer, and less of an aspiring scientist or a philosopher. Assuming that even matters to you, since you seem to put such a high value on "winning". If I say that a public domain possesses easy and readily available information on the subject, and in great multitude, then that is my stance. Your insistence to provide google searches and links for the readier, is in fact, directly contradictory to my stance. You and Mr Red Legion guy have chosen to use that perspective as fodder for more then 3 pages, like some idiot politician running a smear campaign because they have nothing truly of substance to offer. I CANNOT possibly ACCURATELY represent, on these gaming forums, the ORGY of information that would suddenly appear to the reader if they bothered to type a short string of words into google, it is FAR TO VAST and you know that. Thus, your tireless baiting of me, and I am not biting, nor will I be swayed or manipulated by such transparent and weak drivel.. My proof exists in full, beyond this gaming venue and it is 100% Contingent on it's state of easy accessibility to everyone who desires to seek it out. 1. Information: is public, readily available and easy to find. 2. Location:internet browser3. Key words: "RMT MMO's" "Bots MMORPG's" "RMT and Botting MMO's" or any other combination. 4. Potential reading material: consists of literally millions of pages of text, all with remarkably similar information. proving that RMT and Botting are now commonplace in ALL Major MMO'sThat is legit, regardless of how much you complain, and regardless of your ill need to get the last word in on a video game forum. My stance is rational, sensible and overloaded with evidence readily available to all. The reader has direction, guidance and a commentary on what they are expected to see. After they then do so, THEY can decide, not you. Them making their own choice, and me not telling them what to think (like you do so often) is the heart and soul of my stance, it's length and breadth and my proof is contingent on the readier's decision making process after the fact. All that you are doing is baiting me with your imagined version of the truth, in the hopes of developing more poop to fling at me. It is not working, and with each passing page your truest nature is beginning to reveal itself. I am happy to take part, although I suspect that most of the people here already knew what you were about anyway. I am also happy to keep throwing facts in your face... Ya know, instead of just bending over to your imagined realities like everyone else does.
And again, my SIMPLE stance... undiluted and in plain text for all to see. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4730
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:36:00 -
[385] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:No quote? GǪbecause (again) that the entire problem is that you failed to do just that.
Quote:Ok.... I guess your blowing hot air because your claim cannot be substantiated in any way shape or form. GǪexcept that you are asking me to prove a negative, which cannot be done. The fact remains: you have failed to provide any evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom.
Quote:And again, my SIMPLE stance... undiluted and in plain text. GǪwhich is still irrelevant since it fails to provide any evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:37:00 -
[386] - Quote
Where is the quote Tippa? Where did I make the claims that you're saying that I did? Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4730
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:38:00 -
[387] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Where is the quote Tippa? Where did I make the claims that you're saying that I did? Page 8 and onwards.
Oh, andQuote:You manipulated text one to many times, screwed up and got caught. No, that was you. You manipulated my statement to turn it into the exact opposite of what was said. I have consistently said that you failed to provide any evidence to support your detailed claims about who does what where under the auspices of whom. You tried to turn this into me saying that you had provided such evidence and was asking me to provide a quote where you did this. Since you didn't no such quote is available, for obvious reasons.
Now, but altering the wording further, you are actually making a proper, non-negative request while trying to make it seem like you're asking for the same thing (which you aren't). GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:40:00 -
[388] - Quote
A quote. I see a sarcastic comment about water not being wet at the top.
You are the queen of pyramid quoting, we all know that Give it to me. You cannot, because you made it up.
You. Lose. Deal with it. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
4730
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:43:00 -
[389] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:A quote. I see a sarcastic comment about water not being wet at the top. Then keep reading. I can't quote every post you used to build your unsupported case because the forum software doesn't allow for that amount of quotes. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
If not, contact Miss DSA to shed your wardecs. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
443
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:44:00 -
[390] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:A quote. I see a sarcastic comment about water not being wet at the top. Then keep reading. I can't quote every post you used to build your unsupported case because the forum software doesn't allow for that amount of quotes.
Fail. Epic fail.
* Sucks on a victory lollipop and takes in some sweet sunshine.
The queen of Pyramid quoting CANT FIND NOT ONE REFERENCE to support his false claim. Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI. Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |