Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ai Sakura
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:27:00 -
[1]
http://myeve.eve-online.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1491&tid=1
Are you seriously having a laugh?
You cannot assist your buddies by remote repairing their POS without getting smacked by the ban/warning stick?
What does this achieve exactly?
|
Rodge
Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:34:00 -
[2]
It stops people sitting at the POS in high sec repairing it, while being totally immune to the guys who can legitimately shoot at it.
In the future, I'd guess they'll allow it, but flag you for assisting the tower. Until then, I think it's pretty obvious why it'd be considered an exploit.
Sig inappropriate-not eve related -Abdalion
[ 2005.04.17 00:34:30 ] Nagilam > u better leave Rodge, u will not gank any1 else 2nite......
|
Ghostshadow
AFK Corp
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:34:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Ghostshadow on 21/06/2007 21:33:45
Originally by: Ai Sakura http://myeve.eve-online.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1491&tid=1
Are you seriously having a laugh?
You cannot assist your buddies by remote repairing their POS without getting smacked by the ban/warning stick?
What does this achieve exactly?
Because in high sec theres no offense for it...
(in high sec)
Corp A wardecs Corp B. Corp A attacks Corp B POS Corp C repairs Corp B POS Corp A can't do a thing because of concord...
See? --
Under new ownership since 20th June '07 |
Lord WarATron
Amarr Black Nova Corp Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:37:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ai Sakura http://myeve.eve-online.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=1491&tid=1
Are you seriously having a laugh?
You cannot assist your buddies by remote repairing their POS without getting smacked by the ban/warning stick?
What does this achieve exactly?
Say you putup a high sec pos. Say i wardec you and bring a gang to blow it up. You dont bother defending it when it comes out of reinforced, insted you get neutral people or those who left corp to freely repair it. If I attack the neutral, I get concorded. Thus your pos is basically invincible, since you can get neutrals to afk repair it with 100% safety.
Thats why its a exploit - to prevent afk 100% safe pos repair/shield boost. --
Billion Isk Mission |
Ai Sakura
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:46:00 -
[5]
Shouldnt CCP have addressed the issue or made it high sec only exploit then as opposed to going OTT and hitting the whole playerbase it applies to.
|
Maya Rkell
Third Grade Ergonomics
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:48:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Ai Sakura Shouldnt CCP have addressed the issue or made it high sec only exploit then as opposed to going OTT and hitting the whole playerbase it applies to.
Yes. Applying it to 0.0 is ridiculous.
//Maya |
Nayret
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:48:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Nayret on 21/06/2007 21:50:14 In my opinion, while I understand the nature of the exploit this also has a negative effect on those that own the POS.
If the system was implemented correctly someone repping would be flagged and allowed to be shot down by the corp who has issued the war dec. The POS owner would then in turn be able to sustain damage for a much longer period of time as a result of being repped (as opposed to not at all). This is especially true for corporations with who are unable to adequitely defend themself.
In short my feelings are, it wasnt implemented correctly, and no one should suffer negative consequences at a result. Theres many other ways this problem could have been dealth with other than marking it an exploit.
|
Krugerrand
0utbreak
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:52:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Maya Rkell
Originally by: Ai Sakura Shouldnt CCP have addressed the issue or made it high sec only exploit then as opposed to going OTT and hitting the whole playerbase it applies to.
Yes. Applying it to 0.0 is ridiculous.
I am sure that in anywhere except high sec it will not apply and that its just badly worded. If you mail CCP they might be able to tell you.
|
Maya Rkell
Third Grade Ergonomics
|
Posted - 2007.06.21 21:57:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Maya Rkell on 21/06/2007 21:56:33 The wording is quite clear. It's an exploit, period. Not going to waste my time asking for "clarification", or risk banning by repping a POS.
//Maya |
Paco Paco
|
Posted - 2007.06.22 05:11:00 -
[10]
Its definately not an exploit in 0.0 I suppose it kinda is in lowsec since you would suffer a sec status penalty to take the nuetral reppers down. It really only applies in hisec since it would call in Concord. Say what you mean CCP.
In 0.0, "Oh noes! Nuetral reppers!"
"I hear they don't tank to well."
|
|
Atlanton Marcus
Caldari Veto.
|
Posted - 2007.06.22 05:15:00 -
[11]
Well, while it was was deemed illegal in all space, I think that the only exploit is neutral repairing in high security space, so I would imagine that a GM with a clear head would't ban someone using it in low security or 0.0.
|
Phoenix Lord
The Arrow Project Morsus Mihi
|
Posted - 2007.06.22 05:20:00 -
[12]
We really need a GM or Dev to post about this to clear it up...
Pretty stupid having it worded like this.
Arrow Capital Ship Sales |
WhitePhantom
Gallente Edenists
|
Posted - 2007.06.22 05:23:00 -
[13]
Its simple just wait til they fix the flag issue, so you can shoot and people any security level.
Till then people who don't own it will have to help in other ways, its a small issue for those in 0.0 space, but somebody has to repair the person that is going to repair the POS right?
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |