Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Derp Durrr
Aliastra Gallente Federation
300
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 18:29:45 -
[1] - Quote
let me cut straight to the chase.
Eve is a safe place.
I won't bore you with anecdotes etc.
I am looking for suggestions, no matter how ridiculous, to help make Eve unsafe again.
just think of your surroundings and think of what would really mess up said surroundings if X would happen.
Lets Make Eve Grimey Again.
Founder of the soon-to-be Legendary Tournament series -=DESTRUCTION DERPY=- Are you up for the challenge? Join our ingame channel Destruction Derpy today!
|
Melissa Buto
Arch Arsonists of EvE Another Really Stupid Enterprise
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 18:42:08 -
[2] - Quote
No local. |
Syeed Ameer Ali
Heimatar People's Loot Expropriation Committee
210
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 20:05:15 -
[3] - Quote
Melissa Buto wrote:No local.
Sadly, we, as players, have no way to abolish local chat at will.
It's more productive to discuss what sorts of emergent content might make EVE less safe, since the devs clearly have no interest in helping this effort out with game mechanics.
everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com
|
Saeger1737
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2274
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 20:30:45 -
[4] - Quote
Smartbomb every undock
MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!
|
Derp Durrr
Aliastra Gallente Federation
302
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 23:43:28 -
[5] - Quote
Syeed Ameer Ali wrote:Melissa Buto wrote:No local. Sadly, we, as players, have no way to abolish local chat at will. It's more productive to discuss what sorts of emergent content might make EVE less safe, since the devs clearly have no interest in helping this effort out with game mechanics.
This is indeed my aim, to see what we as a playerbase can do to liberate each other of that claustrophobic experience called "safety".
Founder of the soon-to-be Legendary Tournament series -=DESTRUCTION DERPY=- Are you up for the challenge? Join our ingame channel Destruction Derpy today!
|
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2370
|
Posted - 2017.06.29 23:53:22 -
[6] - Quote
Variable system security status.
Yeah yeah, stop laughing, I know it'll never happen.
Or...instead of Sansha Incursions, make a hisec system lowsec for 1-6 hours, pick the system at random, happens 4 times a day.
Yeah, CCP will never do it.
Let capitals back into hisec.
..........nahhh, they won't go for it.
Bring back mines?
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
Saeger1737
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2277
|
Posted - 2017.06.30 10:34:52 -
[7] - Quote
Smart bombing fleets to smartbomb gates, burn not only jita but every trade hub 2x times a week at random days and times.
MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!
|
Sol epoch
Aliastra Gallente Federation
462
|
Posted - 2017.06.30 20:42:13 -
[8] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Smart bombing fleets to smartbomb gates, burn not only jita but every trade hub 2x times a week at random days and times.
Good idea but unfortunately nobody can be concerned or bothered with anything remotely like doing something it seems!
Are those station camping people! You know the ones who demand you can't go here or there and say who you can or can't take into your corp doing anything as They seem to have gone quiet! |
Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
115
|
Posted - 2017.07.01 07:09:16 -
[9] - Quote
The ability to bribe CONCORD, or at least try. The bigger the bribe the more likely CONCORD gets "lost" on the way to the scene of the crime. If you screw up the bribe, or get the wrong cop, you get heavy fines.
This seems like it has the potential to generate content.
Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.
|
Dan Kashada
Wormhole Incursion Mission Patrol Service
9
|
Posted - 2017.07.01 08:19:30 -
[10] - Quote
Do a out of the blue 24hr purge and make LS/HS have the same game mechanics as WH/0.0 in this period |
|
Saeger1737
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2279
|
Posted - 2017.07.01 11:19:24 -
[11] - Quote
Sol epoch wrote:Saeger1737 wrote:Smart bombing fleets to smartbomb gates, burn not only jita but every trade hub 2x times a week at random days and times. Good idea but unfortunately nobody can be concerned or bothered with anything remotely like doing something it seems! Are those station camping people! You know the ones who demand you can't go here or there and say who you can or can't take into your corp/Alliance! Are they doing anything as They seem to have gone quiet! A little bird told me there is some turmoil going on! Wouldn't know, little birds and grapevines have been rambling off a ton of stuff the last week... Egos are getting slammed.
But we could smartbomb them too
MERC WITH A MOUTH, Send me DPS and my fleet will double it back! Special offer!
|
Sol epoch
Aliastra Gallente Federation
464
|
Posted - 2017.07.01 17:08:23 -
[12] - Quote
Saeger1737 wrote:Sol epoch wrote:Saeger1737 wrote:Smart bombing fleets to smartbomb gates, burn not only jita but every trade hub 2x times a week at random days and times. Good idea but unfortunately nobody can be concerned or bothered with anything remotely like doing something it seems! Are those station camping people! You know the ones who demand you can't go here or there and say who you can or can't take into your corp/Alliance! Are they doing anything as They seem to have gone quiet! A little bird told me there is some turmoil going on! Wouldn't know, little birds and grapevines have been rambling off a ton of stuff the last week... Egos are getting slammed. But we could smartbomb them too
Good point! |
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries VOID Intergalactic Forces
435
|
Posted - 2017.07.01 18:14:59 -
[13] - Quote
Jagd Wilde wrote:The ability to bribe CONCORD, or at least try. The bigger the bribe the more likely CONCORD gets "lost" on the way to the scene of the crime. If you screw up the bribe, or get the wrong cop, you get heavy fines.
This seems like it has the potential to generate content.
I can see people dumping a lot of isk, therefore deleting isk from the game by doing this.
Edit: idea is the bribe is around to 1 to 2 times the cost of the ship
"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith
|
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2375
|
Posted - 2017.07.03 13:26:55 -
[14] - Quote
Yeah, folks have already suggested being able to 'wardec' individual pilots. Especially the ones that hide in NPC corps.
CCP said something about breaking the game, or something like that.
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
hellokittyonline
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
133
|
Posted - 2017.07.05 20:40:46 -
[15] - Quote
So something a little more reasonable, I think CCP should greatly reduce the amount of isk that is generated through bounties in high sec and replace it with loot that would have to be scooped in order to convert npc kills into profit. The reason that this is relevant is that carebears are much more likely to shoot a thief if the thief is taking something that is actually valuable. |
hellokittyonline
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
133
|
Posted - 2017.07.05 21:22:43 -
[16] - Quote
Also If you're looking something that we as players could do: 30-40 man destroyer fleet in SOE mission hubs to suicide gank mission runners because not enough of this is happening. |
Clockwork Robot
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2017.07.06 01:33:19 -
[17] - Quote
A poster named "derp", and a poster named "hellokitty" walk into a played out decades old meme-bar.
The use-netter says "Can I get you guys some fresh ideas for disparaging online players?"
The posters say "We want EvE to be less safe!"
The use-netter says "I got this Risk, if you'd like to..."
The posters interrupt quickly "No no no... Sorry. Less safe for the other people! Not for us, man. We want it less safe in Hi-Sec. Specifically for the people we kill. Cause filthcasulcarebearskrubtears. You know?"
The use-netter shows them the NuForums. |
Manwithdog
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.06 11:07:29 -
[18] - Quote
All four empires need to be separated by lowsec, No High sec Routes what so ever . That should shake things up in high sec at least, maby the same for 0.0 , no 0.0 to highsec routes , lowsec has to provide a buffer there too
Please be gentle with criticism , im special |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2377
|
Posted - 2017.07.06 15:14:53 -
[19] - Quote
Been suggested, been shot down.
About the only time hisec has been interesting was when Lumi went low for the DUST 514 event where the Caldy Titan was killed.
Much fun.....
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
Jasmine Deer
Perkone Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2017.07.07 03:14:12 -
[20] - Quote
Derp Durrr wrote:let me cut straight to the chase.
Eve is a safe place.
I won't bore you with anecdotes etc.
I am looking for suggestions, no matter how ridiculous, to help make Eve unsafe again.
just think of your surroundings and think of what would really mess up said surroundings if X would happen.
Lets Make Eve Grimey Again.
I believe you might be interested in a game that is still under development.
It has a working title of "Invisible Suburban Rooftop Sniper".
|
|
Dsparil
42 LVL's of Infinity Initiative Mercenaries
22
|
Posted - 2017.07.09 15:40:24 -
[21] - Quote
Easy. Get rid of the stupid kill right system they put into place two years ago. Get rid of the no friendly fire feature in corporations. Set things back to the way they were. EVE used to be a very fun and challenging place. CCP doesn't seem to understand that this isn't WoW. By holding the hands of high sec carebears they're going to chase away a lot of the content. In fact they already have chased away some people. The killrights system is just outright ******** now. Awoxing is impossible now. There's no fun anymore. Go gate camp or get involved in meta-game politics(which to me, is the most annoying thing in this game).
......and I really do hope CCP sees this post. There are some things that definitely need to be rolled back. Make EVE great again. Stop holding peoples' hands. Seriously. I've taken several hiatuses from the game just because it gets boring. |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2378
|
Posted - 2017.07.09 21:28:07 -
[22] - Quote
Awoxing isn't impossible.....just....abit harder now.
And if you sneak into a corp that has 'No friendly fire' that just means you need to talk somebody into a duel...you know...to test your tank......
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
2651
|
Posted - 2017.07.10 19:06:12 -
[23] - Quote
Make citadels lootable in all parts of space. The current 'best practice' in null is to not defend your space, let the heat die down and then go collect your stuff. (see WWB for example of a very large entity folding up for a month and then skulking back later with more or less zero meaningful loss)
TLDR - no magical space teleportation hoo haw
No local in null
Delayed local in LS
Bring back the watch list (if we can once again make ratting supers go boom..... what's the downside to that again??? I don't remember.)
STOP THINKING THAT PANDERING TO ANYONE WILL GET MORE SUBSCRIPTIONS. (it's making it worse)
(imagine hollow thud as I pass out from the release of all that built up pandering rage - it started when they put cyno jammers in the game and has just been incrementally building ever since)
PRO TIP: The original Eve concept is/was great and is what drew folks here and kept them in the first place. Don't give up on that, double down on it! |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2379
|
Posted - 2017.07.10 20:06:30 -
[24] - Quote
We'll always have Elite:Dangerous.
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
Clockwork Robot
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
181
|
Posted - 2017.07.11 11:18:41 -
[25] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:STOP THINKING THAT PANDERING TO ANYONE WILL GET MORE SUBSCRIPTIONS.
Unless it's pandering to the right people. |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
2653
|
Posted - 2017.07.11 15:59:51 -
[26] - Quote
Clockwork Robot wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:STOP THINKING THAT PANDERING TO ANYONE WILL GET MORE SUBSCRIPTIONS. Unless it's pandering to the right people.
True enough, but it's become obvious over the years that the norm for player requests doesn't revolve around making the game better, it has revolved around gaining advantage. I suppose that's not entirely fair to say. Rewording it a bit..... most of the soul crushing game changes have come from players trying to gain advantage.
This is only aggravated by CCPs unwillingness to roll back changes that suck. I get stubborn, but what they have(n't) done over the years is beyond explanation.
So that leaves with 'Who are the right people?'
I think CCP has proven that listening to anyone in or running a large null / wh entity (spoiler - same guys) doesn't make playing eve more fun for most of the players.
I think a first good step would be to get rid of the overabundance of supers. The production rate has outpaced the loss rate since 6 months after their introduction. (CCPs solution was to remove the watchlist because too many ratting supers were being lost - which is what we all know they were introduced into the game to do in the first place?????)
Ideas to head back in the correct direction: 1- limit the number of anoms in any given system to 20 total. 2- get rid of system upgrades so folks actually fight over good space instead of just spend some isk to create it. 3- kill supers..... errrr..... let players kill supers a- bring back the watch list so the stupid may be punished b- suspend DT when those epic fights are in progress such that all those supers on the field don't get magically saved 4- make the contents of citadels lootable in all parts of space. (no more WWB type 'dud' conflicts)
|
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
3220
|
Posted - 2017.07.11 18:12:04 -
[27] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:STOP THINKING THAT PANDERING TO ANYONE WILL GET MORE SUBSCRIPTIONS. (it's making it worse) Only pandering to those whom are owed carriers by way of their forum shenanigans will make EvE great again
MAKE EVE GREAT AGAIN! GIVE BRONSON HIS THANNY!
Relatively Notorious By Association
My Many Misadventures
I predicted FAUXs
|
FlipMoe Squad
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 04:25:33 -
[28] - Quote
It's nice to see the old forums ending on such a high note. Thank goodness they'll be archived as the "how-not-to" forum. Thanks for your many contributions! Seeya in the new shiny forums! Imagine remove off topic posts....that's only the tip of the iceberg!
GLEE!!!!
These forums smell
|
Chewytowel Haklar
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
344
|
Posted - 2017.07.16 09:22:29 -
[29] - Quote
Completely remove the ability to store items and ships in NPC stations safely. Also add the ability to loot citadels and other player owned structures as others have mentioned.
No more hoarding safely = More risk for all |
Worgen Fratmon
Netflix and Kill Digital Vendetta
4
|
Posted - 2017.07.20 09:46:54 -
[30] - Quote
Remove all timers from every structure, triple or quadruple the hp (to give owners a chance to defend), make NPC stations destructible with appropriate NPC response fleets (if destroyed, they are rebuilt in a week or so), no asset safety anywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |