Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Geanos
The Scope Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2017.06.18 11:10:57 -
[31] - Quote
The best way to have an isk sink and also something that needs to be transported a a citadel as a fuel would be the creation of something like "maintenance boxes" sold by the NPC (Upwell). Also you should have a 6 month max storage capacity for those "maintenance boxes". When there are no "maintenance boxes" present in the structure, the citadel starts malfunctioning.
- Why sold by the NPC? Because items sold like that act like an ISK sink. - Why something that needs to be transported at the citadel? Active play, prevent spam trolling of structures (especially in null-sec) and provide a way to determine if the structure is abandoned or not (and make it easier to clean up abandoned structures).
As a side thought, the removal of NPC sold items required to build stuff was not an inspired decision, they where a good isk sink. |
Nasar Vyron
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
242
|
Posted - 2017.06.18 23:07:03 -
[32] - Quote
Kenneth Feld wrote:
Reading is hard - re read the sentence you quoted - small amount per RUN
each RUN takes more TIME, therefore more fuel/ice
Did i really need to explain that to you?
As far as towers, you will be able to do 100's of towers worth of reactions in a single drilling platform, so that is why they are adding fuel/ice to each reaction BPO
I do have a very good idea of what and how much, i am not CSM or anything like that, but have participated with CCP on these discussion for the past 2 years.
Apparently reading is hard, you never said per run. You specifically said the longer reactions, which is why I said I knew you were meaning to say (number of runs put in) then quoted CCP to clarify for others, not you. The way you stated it made it sound like it was going to consume fuel as you ran reactions separate from the normal build cost. So again, yes, they are adding ICE products -not fuel- to the material cost for the reaction blueprints.
What I am saying is this will likely be less than what we currently see in fuel usage (there is no wasted fuel being consumed when not reacting outside of what minimal usage they put on the service module) in addition to the fact that we have leftover PI not being used by these new reaction prints which were used in the making of fuel blocks. You skipped over that, so I suppose reading is harder than either of us thought.
We all have our sources for information, and so far all that's been said is ice products, nothing about PI nor actual numbers of ice products or even if it's remaining the same ratios as current reactions. Nothing specific at all, so if you do know you might want to tell CCP. It may speed them along since you know more than them about these changes apparently. |
Francis Raven
ExDominion Evictus.
104
|
Posted - 2017.06.19 12:48:22 -
[33] - Quote
I love this idea for the simple fact that there are just way too many structures in highsec, and it clutters my overview when flying through.
I think either fuel or isk requirements are fine. Fuel requirements are more lore-friendly in terms of how things work?
ExDominion | Nullsec Corporation | Website | Forums | Established Nov. 2015 |
|
Voddick
AFK
100
|
Posted - 2017.06.20 16:43:53 -
[34] - Quote
All discussion should now be moved to the new forums: https://meta.eveonline.com/t/upwell-structures-should-consume-base-amounts-of-fuel-or-isk/4019 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |