Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 79 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Portia Venice
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:28:18 -
[31] - Quote
CCP, I can't for the life of me figure out why this is a good change. The last 2 years in a row ISK making opportunities have been major nerfed. In order to plex my account i have to spend more time playing this game. I understand you have to make money but so do i to keep playing. If it becomes an issue where i cannot keep playing due to ISK method Nerf (continuous) than i will no longer be able to play eve. This isn't a grr you post or a angry post, its a real problem i foresee for many players my self alike. Super ratting was the only reason for me to move out to NULL to be with Goonswarm. You nerf all of Null (ore atoms, Ratting) but you do not touch High security space Incursions? .... Yes i post terribly I'm sorry. |
Ralph Shepard
The Dysfunctionals Fidelas Constans
17
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:28:38 -
[32] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:Hi Space Friends, Coming with our release on Tuesday, weGÇÖre significantly reducing the damage output of Fighters. Why:We are making this change because Carriers & Supercarriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec. As you may have seen in the May Monthly Economy Report, there is a significant upward trend in the Money Supply. This is primarily due to NPC Bounties. This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players. We also think that Carriers and Supercarriers are a bit too effective in PvP now. This change will significantly change the PvP balance, but weGÇÖre confident that Carriers and Supercarriers will remain powerful options for PvP. What:- Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No Change
- Light Fighters (Attack): 20% reduction to Basic Attack and Heavy Rocket Salvo damage.
- Support Fighters: No Change
- Heavy Fighters (Heavy Attack): 10% reduction to Basic Attack and Torpedo Salvo damage.
- Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage.
- Heavy Fighters (Shadow): No Change
- NPCs are 15% more likely to shoot at fighters than they are currently.
We will continue to observe the economy after these changes and will make adjustments as necessary to keep it healthy for all our players.
If you truly wanted to do something with isk generation, you would fix incursions. Which means this is just an excuse from you. |
Hikkata
Sequent Industry Red Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:29:34 -
[33] - Quote
Intigo wrote:Haha, this should be great. Good changes! Wut? But why? One tengu can jam two carriers. Why are you doing this? |
Tobias Frank
43
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:30:16 -
[34] - Quote
Hey, what about making reasonable changes from the start and not nerf it into the ground AFTER the players invested huge amounts time and ressources in things like supercarriers or rorquals. We are not in World of Warcraft where we can simply reroll to another class in a few days or so. In EVE, it is really frustrating. |
Anthar Thebess
1697
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:30:30 -
[35] - Quote
Wait what? Srlsly no. Who had this idea?
STOP MAKING CAPITALS AND SUPERS ****** IN PVP.
If you wan to slow down PVE income - reduce bounty, or increase the rat EHP.
Stop discrimination, help in a fight against terrorists
Show your support to The Cause!
|
Vitak Zerath
Finnish Space Jaegers Goonswarm Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:30:37 -
[36] - Quote
Im pretty sure that if the MERs continue like this, there will be timers on ratting anoms too.
Im not complaining though. I agree that having such massive isk faucets is bad. |
Tiesto DJ
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:31:20 -
[37] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Can you please delete VNI and Isthars from the game first before you tinker with fighters? They are by far the bigger problem in this game when it comes to ratting.
Having tons of VNIshtars clog up Havens, Sanctums and Hubs is not sustainable and huge annoyance to any player except for these AFK people.
Read as, **** off VNI/Ishtars. I want Sacs to myself and dont touch obvious op fighters. |
Lura Zara
Worlds Without Boundaries Special Forces
23
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:34:51 -
[38] - Quote
Heres a grand Idea, Nerf incursions. The amount of ISK made through that alone is ridiculously farmed. However now your talking about nerfing capital ships again. Which I hardly see as a good thing when a capital is far more likely to die in actual combat than an incursion bear.
Then again theres always the VNI Navys out there with multiple accounts soloing all the high end anoms with no self risk as they watch a movie.
But yes its the capital ships/fighters. not the NPC bountys or income or site difficulty that was based off of a meta the better part of a decade ago.
CCP please rethink this. |
NoobMan
Hard Knocks Inc. Hard Knocks Citizens
332
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:35:28 -
[39] - Quote
All these null nerfs... W-Space looking more attractive Epic Nice!
Operations Director of Hard K(n)ocks Inc.
|
Abagah Khan
Shinigami Miners ChaosTheory.
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:35:36 -
[40] - Quote
So rather than address the obvious issues of incursions, you yet again massively weaken capitals in pvp. People who train and invest ~30bn in a ship should be able to make more isk than someone ratting afk in a vni.
If you really want to reduce isk availability, hammer on incursions and reduce overall bounty availability. Rather than yet again going full hammer on anyone who trained into a capital |
|
Odinessa
Jones' Barbecue and Foot Massage
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:35:45 -
[41] - Quote
At the rate you are going, you will end up running off most of your player base with these nerfs to fun content. Your real nerf is to nerf the numbers of players, until there are none left. |
DutchGunner
Delta vane Corp. Mordus Angels
200
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:36:17 -
[42] - Quote
I can see that some changes were needed considering the high ticks one can make when running anomolies in carriers and the even higher ones with super carriers.
However I think that this reduction in damage is too strong. Why not start with 10% for the light attack fighters and 15% for the heavy attack ones. If that is still not enough, you can always do another.
I can see that some balance is needed in the bigger ships for both mining, pve and pvp but this is taking it a bit too far in one go. |
TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
1290
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:36:38 -
[43] - Quote
still would like fighters to be less ezmode anti-everything |
Requiescat
Adversity. Pandemic Legion
212
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:36:58 -
[44] - Quote
CCP Larrikin wrote:Heavy Fighters (Long Range Attack): 30% reduction to Basic Attack damage. a 5 or 10% change might have been reasonable but a change as dramatic as 30%, over a year after implementation tells me that either you and the rest of your dev team haven't been paying attention, or you're completely incompetent. which would you rather it be?
hi i'm requiescat, and i'm your best friendGÖÑ
|
Portia Venice
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:37:12 -
[45] - Quote
Time to Login high-sec incursion smartbombing alts to wage war against the high-sec ISK making bears. |
Lord Kaho
Banished Braindead Zombies Circle-Of-Two
3
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:37:46 -
[46] - Quote
:D
They cant fix the server for bigger cap fights... So nerf Supers... And there will not be capital fights anymore.
Good job. How many money got the brain of this idea? :D
I hope much! Now CCP dont need to work on the serves :P |
Laborus Necrae
The Cobrastan Cabal Sect
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:37:54 -
[47] - Quote
Greed is Good! |
She11by
Big Boys Don't Cry Kids With Guns Alliance
11
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:38:09 -
[48] - Quote
Carriers and motherships are sh*t in pvp already, why are u doing it... any ab ship can tank even mothership 24\7 |
commander aze
429
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:38:28 -
[49] - Quote
Ok fine. I get it. Not thrilled cause that was my gravy train. But neef all the things...
Just one question. Why in the heck would you further screw cardier ratring but yet again upping the chance of fighter dieing. Its already a stupid number of fighters dead please just not that. Everything else is fine but for the love of god dont keep screwing with that percent chance of switching. You habe to reward the carduer and super carrier ratrers for fielding the isk in some way.
Commander Aze For CSM XII
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=506400
Support the Community #Broadcast4Reps
|
Kaoraku Shayiskhun
The 1st Regiment Brotherhood of Spacers
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:38:45 -
[50] - Quote
This whole thing is had to call bullshit.
Yeah, capital ships are gives you easy ISK, but why you had to wait with that? PL, NC. and goon now ratted enough? They mining and ratting with these ships 23/7. This do bad for the market, not those, who use it ratting 1-2 hours. Or did you ever tried to farm your monthly plex? And after that you should buy some ships etc to actually really play the game not just farm yourself over the days.
Those, who farmed the **** out with this will keep their money I guess, so this change will **** up only smaller players. This will not resolve the problem with powerblocks, either the problem with market, since bigguy will be able to make more and more money, couse they already have enough money. They will farm like hell on, they wll mining on too.
You have to learn shitload to be able to fly those ships, and you have to spend shitton of money. And now it will be pointless, couse with this money you can bring 4 other ships, and it will be able to fight, their weapons will not jammed by a 3 day old char.
I have to say this is the first time I started to think I will stop that game, couse after so many years you started to do these, but it is late, and all these changes will give better chances for those, who already have. |
|
Zduhac Aldent
S0utherN Comfort Test Alliance Please Ignore
17
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:40:01 -
[51] - Quote
Lol that moment when you were laughing at roqu changes and now karma and ccp hits you. But no really i support this, it is very very unfair for me who have trained for a whole ******* YEAR and few months earning money to buy super to have larger income then l4 mission runner. oh Eve what have you become, less you invest yourself in Eve the better it is for you
Also not to even talk about **** carriers are in pvp at the moment and now you are killing it even more, why dont you just delete supercarrers and carries out of the game, oh wait you actually did that now, from now on we will only be seeing them on pictures and reading tales of carriers and how at some point ppl were actually building them and using them |
Sassura
Sassy's Corporation
10
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:40:11 -
[52] - Quote
CCP, why don't you just cut to the chase and delete Delve from the map.
All those Goons packed in there, making tons of isk, mining all that ore and building a ton of stuff. Playing your game in a way that you don't want.
Then no one else would have to deal with the nerfs to mining and ratting to fix eve. There wouldn't be any need to nerf the carriers and supers that defend the too prosperous region and we can mine without timers in the rest of new eden. |
Lquid Drisseg
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
15
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:42:25 -
[53] - Quote
This is only going to very slightly curb the money supply, people ratting in carriers will be hit the hardest and they will just jump into supers which will still clear sites like nobodys business.
Can you please just address the root cause and publicly say that isk generation in EVE is flat out broken and need to be rethought from the ground up? |
claus Hanson
Facetious Indifference DARKNESS.
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:43:47 -
[54] - Quote
So u basicly implement the rorq's being able to mine a super in no time (yes rorq's are silly overpowered, also pvp wise) and now close to every 1 flies a carrier/super because of the Rorq's
And then u surprised people are making more Money.
CCP logic i guess |
Firnen Bakru
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:00 -
[55] - Quote
please nerf incursions aswell then |
Portia Venice
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:07 -
[56] - Quote
Sassura wrote:CCP, why don't you just cut to the chase and delete Delve from the map.
All those Goons packed in there, making tons of isk, mining all that ore and building a ton of stuff. Playing your game in a way that you don't want.
Then no one else would have to deal with the nerfs to mining and ratting to fix eve. There wouldn't be any need to nerf the carriers and supers that defend the too prosperous region and we can mine without timers in the rest of new eden.
Except for the fact we don't put thousands of M/3 of ore on the market, you can blame the Russians for that. |
Meridon Arthas
Pain and pleasur Circle-Of-Two
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:12 -
[57] - Quote
How I see the patches PvE/Mining ships from a fews months.
NERF 1.1 NERF 1.2 NERF 1.3 NERF 1.4....
CCP, U better have a look on ghost training than nerf ships wich need Isk investment like carrier and off course Rorqual and SP as well.
What's the problem ? People are too rich ? Better change the PvE than nerf everytime a ship or module. |
Kestrel Clairvoyant
Mine 'N' Refine Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:22 -
[58] - Quote
Sassura wrote:CCP, why don't you just cut to the chase and delete Delve from the map.
All those Goons packed in there, making tons of isk, mining all that ore and building a ton of stuff. Playing your game in a way that you don't want.
Then no one else would have to deal with the nerfs to mining and ratting to fix eve. There wouldn't be any need to nerf the carriers and supers that defend the too prosperous region and we can mine without timers in the rest of new eden.
Buhuu, so its our fault we play EVE and actually make ISK in it? Like Delve is biggest problem in game..jesus...get some common sense... all you haters can go f yourself back to whatever HS dump you crawled from... |
Lucy Callagan
Furnace Thermodynamics
268
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:28 -
[59] - Quote
To all the people complaining that : "I can't plex my account anymore, ccp is so greedy they want me to pay it with RL money"
Don't you understant that all the plexes that are in the game have been bought on CCP's website and therefore paying the sub in plex or RL money makes no difference to ccp ? |
Irenia Tsurpalen
Special Assault Unit IT'S ONLY PIXELS
1
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 10:44:55 -
[60] - Quote
In terms of PvP, all you do is kicking smaller groups in the nuts. Fighters are already pretty easy to counter. In terms of PvE, of course there is a big amount of ISK being generated. People have nothing else to do. The Citadel age combined with an total unfun sov mechanic (something something easy to adjust if needed, do you remember?) killed it. Sure I had fun conquering my new home in Fountain but despite the enemy not fighting it took me weeks to fully secure everything thanks to the grinding. However the "war" for our new home was over within a week. This was just for one constellation. And you wonder why people do nothing but PvE'ing and waiting for the next big bang? Which you posponed to winter or even further, just remember how often you posponed the current sov mechanic and that is something I foresee for the "gold rush" update too. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 30 40 50 60 70 .. 79 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |